Can floating solar farms solve the energy crisis?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лис 2021
  • Have you ever heard of floating solar farms? In recent years, such structures have become more and more popular, and some experts even say that in the future they will completely replace traditional solar panels. Floating solar farms generate more electricity than conventional panels while helping to prevent climate change. The authorities of some countries have already announced several megaprojects for their construction. Will they be able to solve the global energy crisis? And how are they arranged in general? Let's figure it out! The potential of solar energy in the world is estimated at 80 Petawatts, which is three times more than all the needs of mankind today. However, in order to use it fully, humanity will need to cover the entire earth's surface with solar panels. And this means that we need to donate fertile land and meadows for grazing, not to mention the complete disappearance of territories with wild animals.
    #technology #invention #solar
    Don’t miss next videos: Press the little bell ((🔔)) to get notifications
    Production Music courtesy of Epidemic Sound www.epidemicsound.com/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 87

  • @mehmettufan7914
    @mehmettufan7914 2 роки тому +34

    Decrease in drinking water evoporation is even more important benefit of this method. Water canals and reservoirs should have panels on surface so we don't loose our precious clean water.

    • @arvind9488
      @arvind9488 2 роки тому +3

      Plastic pollution in the river and the carcinogenic water is very toxic to drink

    • @mosh1986
      @mosh1986 2 роки тому

      nope. if we block water cycle, there will be no rain at the end of it. lead to heatstroke and drier surface land.

  • @bchain6416
    @bchain6416 2 роки тому +29

    Where did you get that information from that 80 PetaWatt is 3 times that of world consumption?
    The world primary energy consumption in 2020 was 556 ExaJoules. This translates into an average power of 17.6 TeraWatt which would be far less than a third of 80 PetaWatt.

    • @day2148
      @day2148 2 роки тому +2

      3 times of what the world needs. Many countries today are still underdeveloped and aren't generating even close to the power their citizens would need, assuming all humans desire equivalent standards of living. Though admittedly that still doesn't come close to 26 PetaWatt.

    • @2ndaryexplosion674
      @2ndaryexplosion674 2 роки тому

      the IEA reported a total world electric energy consumption in 2017 of 21 PWh. 80 PW * 1h = 80 PWh. even with 556 ExaJoules, it'd be about 154 PWh.

  • @VictorGallagherCarvings
    @VictorGallagherCarvings 2 роки тому +20

    I don't know where you get your numbers from but it would only take 0.6% of the surface area of the continental United States to power the entire country with renewable solar power.

    • @illuminate4622
      @illuminate4622 2 роки тому +8

      Yeah this is total bullshit. An area only the size of Spain powers the entire world. Dislike for pessimistic misinformation.

    • @almar8874
      @almar8874 2 роки тому +8

      @@illuminate4622 Yeah, if he can make these kinds of basic mistakes you have to question a lot more of what he says.

    • @ronvosick8253
      @ronvosick8253 2 роки тому +1

      About 12,000sq miles for the united states ( about twice the size of Hawaii or New Jersey. )

    • @VictorGallagherCarvings
      @VictorGallagherCarvings 2 роки тому +2

      @@ronvosick8253 It depends on what assumptions that you make, I came up with a much higher number. But it does not matter, the numbers provided in the video are just gibberish.

    • @illuminate4622
      @illuminate4622 2 роки тому +1

      @@VictorGallagherCarvings let's see...
      Yearly US electricity usage ~4000 TWh
      One sq mile=200MW capacity
      US solar capacity factor ~20%
      One square mile produces= 200MWx8760hoursx0.2capacity factor=
      350 400 MWh= 0.35 TWh
      4000TWh/0.35TWh=11 400sq mi
      Eleven thousand square miles of solar panels to power America. It's actually less than even I thought!

  • @romuloramosdias1137
    @romuloramosdias1137 2 роки тому +4

    It will be great to combine floating solar farms with the pelamis energy generator from waves in Portugal.
    Or even with a tidal Lagoon

  • @IhabFahmy
    @IhabFahmy 2 роки тому +4

    "120 MWp" means 120 Mega Watts peak, not Mega Watts power.... Lots of other confused info in this video. Please get yoacts straight.

  • @striveacademy
    @striveacademy 2 роки тому

    Very important contents. Thanks

  • @kimjohansen6011
    @kimjohansen6011 2 роки тому +1

    Thailand just finalized a solarfarm floating next to a hydropower dam, so the resavoir acts as a battery, eg nighttime production.

  • @glike2
    @glike2 2 роки тому +1

    2 axis Floating solar could be much better than stationary (0 axis) using rotating floating pads, with water hydraulic or air pneumatic tilt control, providing full power over full day time. Southwest USA reservoirs need this.

  • @user-se2mh7qx5o
    @user-se2mh7qx5o Рік тому

    Thanks for sharing

  • @mithsaradasanayake3211
    @mithsaradasanayake3211 2 роки тому +4

    I think this method of providing clean energy should be used to power desalination plants to provide clean drinking water

    • @handendaer
      @handendaer 2 роки тому +2

      it will get salt and and a lot of particles on it,,, gna be hell to clean. not smart.

    • @mithsaradasanayake3211
      @mithsaradasanayake3211 2 роки тому +1

      @@handendaer bruh

    • @extracelestials4368
      @extracelestials4368 2 роки тому

      @@handendaer Lithium and Sodium can be extracted from the brune for Industrial uses.

  • @user-uj2qj3oc1o
    @user-uj2qj3oc1o Рік тому

    very cool

  • @tjtampa214
    @tjtampa214 2 роки тому +1

    The pendulum swings this way and that.

  • @handendaer
    @handendaer 2 роки тому +7

    the washing of salt, particles and everything else will be worse than any dust. good luck with that.

    • @2ndchance220
      @2ndchance220 2 роки тому

      so you are saying they never thought about this and come up with a plan to counter it, before putting in a large scale?

  • @Onthestreetsanjib
    @Onthestreetsanjib 2 роки тому

    world was really changing

  • @jaredhill8721
    @jaredhill8721 2 роки тому +1

    What about the possibility that a panel sinks? A solar farm at the bottom of a lake after a major storm could become an environmental hazard. Nuclear power has a smaller area footprint due to it's much greater power density than renewables or fossil fuels.

    • @fic15
      @fic15 2 роки тому

      Al-tho you do have a point, comparing this to nuclear energy and objecting on the ecological dangers of a sunken solar farm is silly. No offence

    • @stickynorth
      @stickynorth 2 роки тому +1

      @@fic15 Both power forms are needed, but I agree. Even if it sunk the materials are easily recoverable. It's not like we talking oil sands tailings or anything...

  • @Knowledgehub707
    @Knowledgehub707 2 роки тому +1

    I think 1hectare = 2.47 football fields

  • @mindoftheoldone1743
    @mindoftheoldone1743 2 роки тому +1

    Soooooo floating power in an area with hurricanes, tsunami, monsoons, etc I'm sure it will be fine.

    • @Hathorr1067
      @Hathorr1067 2 роки тому

      Shhh, let them make their billions first before looking at real life.

  • @IansOddInterests
    @IansOddInterests Рік тому

    Why not add them to decks of obsolete cargo ships. Anchor the ship offshore , use internal of ship for turbines etc ?

  • @wumao6797
    @wumao6797 2 роки тому +1

    It might solve the energy crisis but I know for a fact it will spoil the water vegetation and wildlife. No sure how this works as sunlight barely reach the bottom of the sea floor but 1 time while swimming under one of these floating solar farms I notice the sea bed below this solar farm is void of marine life and vegetation compare to the surrounding. Asked around but nobody was aware of it or knew anything about it. Does anybody know?

  • @Kelsdoggy
    @Kelsdoggy 2 роки тому

    Looks like a good trampoline

  • @vthilton
    @vthilton 2 роки тому

    Save Our Planet

  • @guillaumeamazonie
    @guillaumeamazonie 2 роки тому

    Lol we dont need to cover the whole map planet with solar panels crazy man x) only a few little part is sufficient !

  • @kiranbrufo
    @kiranbrufo Рік тому

    When it covers the more ocean surface it leads to less evaporation of water and decrease the rainfall which leads to dessert formation ?

  • @ryanehlis426
    @ryanehlis426 Рік тому

    There is no energy crisis! We have a huge supply of Coal, oil, and gas

  • @Dewdaahman
    @Dewdaahman 2 роки тому

    As long as the farms are built on top of the globe, and not half way down either side, or on the bottom, unless of course you bolt them to the water.. lol..

  • @neddyladdy
    @neddyladdy Рік тому

    No, it wont solve it, not alone, but it can help, but only if your grid accepts floating voltage levels.

  • @justmyopinion7620
    @justmyopinion7620 2 роки тому

    👍

  • @amanthatthinks
    @amanthatthinks 2 роки тому

    Our enviornment is now a broken glass and you're trying to fix it with nails and hammer

    • @18booma
      @18booma 2 роки тому

      Our environment is a china shop, and they're trying to take the bull outside so we can pick up the pieces.

  • @Dina-xw7se
    @Dina-xw7se 2 роки тому

    It's not so easy to repair and replace the bad part

  • @prap9774
    @prap9774 2 роки тому

    1 solar panel contains aprx 20 grams of SILVER.

  • @francescos7361
    @francescos7361 Рік тому

    No , I would disagree acquaponics don't work , like oceanographic , work in sponge cities and telescopes , lithium infrastructure , streets , airports and others for desalinization and perception .

  • @Saikat452
    @Saikat452 2 роки тому

    Excellent.... Let's move to age of truth and heaven

  • @Hathorr1067
    @Hathorr1067 2 роки тому

    And anything living under these that require photosynthesis dies, causing dead zones. Just saying.

  • @2ndchance220
    @2ndchance220 2 роки тому

    misleading definition of acronyms and conversion rate..

  • @peterolsen9131
    @peterolsen9131 2 роки тому

    CAN BURNING GAS AND COAL then planting some trees and irrigate them solve the energy crisis?

  • @prap9774
    @prap9774 2 роки тому

    ★ ★ Lord Sminem...please continue pump Silver $100+. Thank you My Lord !! ★ ★

  • @handendaer
    @handendaer 2 роки тому +2

    the lies and propaganda, and the mrons loving it and just begging for it...

  • @ronvosick8253
    @ronvosick8253 2 роки тому +1

    Electricity and water...gee what could go wrong?

    • @n.g.s1mple29
      @n.g.s1mple29 2 роки тому

      Floating renewable have been I use for decades, that's not an issue

  • @joeblow3939
    @joeblow3939 2 роки тому +2

    Nicole Tesla wanted everyone to have access to free energy.
    Thomas Edison beat out Tesla on a contract to install electric generators in the Niagara Falls because he was willing to charge people for the access of using electric.

  • @_6666-
    @_6666- 2 роки тому

    Ha ha ANTARCTICA no power ? ? ? ?

  • @joeblow3939
    @joeblow3939 2 роки тому +2

    If you can't meter it to sell it,
    It's not going to get approval.
    Cars that run on water is a perfect example. The only thing that comes out of the exhaust is water.
    But it will never get approval because they haven't figured out how to charge people for water from lakes and streams or even from the ground. This technology existed back in the 50's.

    • @myaccount__7269
      @myaccount__7269 2 роки тому

      Cars can’t run in water

    • @joeblow3939
      @joeblow3939 2 роки тому

      @@myaccount__7269 cars can run in water. Watch a video on amphibious cars.
      What I'm talking about is, cars that use water as fuel.
      You don't have one, so you instinctively say they don't exist.
      Technically water is h2o. By separating the oxygen from the Hydrogen, you can power a car on Hydrogen.
      There are cars in India that can run on only air. I didn't say that they are practical, but they do exist.
      How hard is it to turn over a diesel engine fast enough to start one. Mack trucks have used air for many years to start there trucks.

    • @myaccount__7269
      @myaccount__7269 2 роки тому

      @@joeblow3939 lol dude...none of that makes sense. Show proof or gtfo

  • @dreamingwhilefat4888
    @dreamingwhilefat4888 2 роки тому

    The energy crisis was solved 100 times by now dont you know. Many people have died because of it.

  • @dave_bob
    @dave_bob 2 роки тому

    Nope.

  • @gusmotorsports
    @gusmotorsports 2 роки тому +1

    The answer is no.

  • @joeblow3939
    @joeblow3939 2 роки тому +2

    🛑 All the more reason not to own an electric car. 🤪

    • @illuminate4622
      @illuminate4622 2 роки тому +1

      This video is bullshit. An area the size of Spain powers the entire world. It fits entirely on former oil fields. Unlike them, it lasts practically forever. This guy used some total nonsense numbers.

    • @daniele_go
      @daniele_go 2 роки тому +2

      I own a Tesla and I will produce the energy I need with solar panels on my roof !

  • @1250Gator
    @1250Gator 2 роки тому +1

    Is this supposed to be satire or did someone play a practical joke on this channel? They think they are going to get electrical things to live on water with wave action and weather. That’s hilarious. I can’t wait until the geese decide to turn these into a toilet and floating nesting place.

  • @Twobirdsbreakingfree
    @Twobirdsbreakingfree 2 роки тому +1

    These are an environmental catastrophe.

    • @nelsonolivera8059
      @nelsonolivera8059 2 роки тому

      Why?

    • @illuminate4622
      @illuminate4622 2 роки тому

      An area the size of Spain of the entire planet is an environmental catastrophe? I don't think so.

  • @haroldgilbert6707
    @haroldgilbert6707 2 роки тому

    Most Chinese provinces having rolling electric black out very bad now get real !!!!!! Utube silly 🙃💩

  • @user-nk5ui2eu6r
    @user-nk5ui2eu6r 2 роки тому +1

    Dislike button 👎

  • @tuomasholo
    @tuomasholo 2 роки тому +1

    This is the most stupid idea to put solar panels on water. Just more ways to waste money.

  • @thomascorbett2936
    @thomascorbett2936 2 роки тому

    Looks like a bad idea

  • @JohannFritz78
    @JohannFritz78 2 роки тому

    What a load of mis information, where did you get the information that the entire surface of the earth needs to be covered. In really just a few 100 square meters needs to be covered.