😂😂😂 Ik ken geen andere autotochtone Nederland die zo veel kennis heeft over andere culturen. Heel verfrissend om te zien een keertje. Zijn videos bewijzen dat een multiculturele samenleving veel interessanter is. Bedankt aan Nederland dat iedereen hier wordt accepteerd en grotendeels gerespecteerd. Ik ben erg dankbaar aan Nederland en Nderlanders. Ik bedoel je wilt niet wonen in een land zoals Amerika....
origin of european people2 In 1778, F.G. Karin wrote in his "Letter about translators of the Russian language": "The terrible difference between our language and the Slavic language often prevents us from expressing ourselves in the Slavic language except for everyday conversation... After our language was adapted to the Slavic language, the situation became quite shameful." In the same century, Johann Christian Dahl, a Danish linguist of German origin, came to Russia at the invitation of Catherine II, where he was busy organizing library work. He changed his name to Ivan Matveevich Dal. His son, Vladimir Ivanovich Dal, born in 1801, became not only a Russian citizen, but also a great Russian poet. In addition to Latin, German, French, he also knew Turkish, Tatar and Kazakh languages. He had invaluable services in the formation of the Russian language, in 1840 he wrote the "Explanatory Dictionary of the Great Russian Language". At first the dictionary was banned, but it was republished in 1863 and 1880.In this dictionary, V. Dal gave the beginning of Russian words from European languages, that is, he "proved" that Russian words originated from European words. In the last copy, the word "great Russian language" was replaced by the word "Russian language". Linguist Gil Nail Favilovich (Bashkir) writes about this dictionary: "I was not surprised when I opened the book 'Ancient Turkic Dictionary' near the Luhansk Cossack... Russian words of ancient Turkic origin. Having studied this rare scientific work up and down, I came to a shocking conclusion - it turns out that there was no Russian language in ancient times. This is a phantom. The calculation here is quite simple: if we remove the words Western European, Turkish and Finnish from this book, the book will remain empty pages." After 1880, this dictionary was repeatedly edited. One of the editors of the dictionary was the Frenchman Ivan Alexandrovich Baudouin de Courtenay, a descendant of King Louis VI. At the beginning of the 20th century, he completed V. I. Dal's dictionary, became a master of history and philology and a doctor of history in Russia. When you get acquainted with this information, it becomes clear that there was no Russian language in the 17th century, and the peoples living here spoke Finno-Ugric and Proto-Bulgarian languages. If there was no Russian language, then there was no Russian people. In the 18th-19th centuries, the Slovene language of the Rusyns living in the territory of Rech-Pospolita was "enriched" with European, Finno-Ugric and Proto-Bulgarian languages, and the Russian language was created, and as the local Finno-Urogs and Tatars/Turks spoke this language, they gradually became Russified. The Proto-Bulgarian language was later called the Church-Slavic language. Russian literary critic and publicist V. G. Belinsky wrote about the difficulty of the Russian language in 1875: "But such progress is possible not only for the young Russian language, which is still in its infancy in every respect, but also for the French language, which is two centuries old... Writing letters in Russian , it's just a pain, the wording is harsh, the grammar and seminary smell, the translations are awkward. If you can't find a Russian equivalent, write the French one, and a good translation will be obtained in the meantime." Thus, we can consider the XVIII-XIX centuries as the period when the Russian language and the Russian people were formed. During this period, the language problem was everywhere in Europe. Due to the spread of Christianity, the Turks were exterminated and the Turkish language gradually disappeared. Instead, new languages and, of course, new peoples appeared. English historian E. Gibbon wrote in the 18th century, referring to the Greek language: "A dictionary was published to explain many words, where they gave the Greek beginning to the word "barbarian". With this quote, E. Gibbon indirectly admits the Greekization of Turkish words. It turns out that the formation of the Greek language and people took place in this period - in the XVIII-XIX centuries. Turkish historian Ulgan Zaki Ok writes about the Greekization of Turkish words: "The names of many historical cities, rivers and mountains in Europe, especially those ending with "-assa, -assos, -anda, -anthos" are of Luvian origin." From the words of the author, it is understood that new Greek words were created by adding these endings to names of places, rivers and mountains of Luvian origin. Sources attribute the emergence of the new German language to the 17th century. But the scientists who carried out this work lived in the 18th-19th centuries. In the 18th century, genius philosophers Immanuel Kant, Johann Georg Hamann, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and William Shakespeare played an indispensable role in the formation of German public consciousness. Johann Georg Hamann was the ideologist of the literary movement "Strikers". The theorist of the group was Johann Gottfried Herder. He wrote a treatise "On the Origin of Languages". Young German poets gathered around him. This group formed the "Society for the Study of Early German History". Under their influence, brilliant philosophers such as Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Friedrich Nietzsche, and John Stuart Mill grew up. In 1826, nationalist-historian Heinrich Duden wrote a course "On the study of national history". A generation of German historians grew up who described almost the entire past of Europe around Germany. Historian Boron von Stein created a collection of resources and explained his commitment quite simply: "I want to develop the course of German history, facilitate its study, and thereby strengthen love for the fatherland, our society and our great ancestors." A.S. Artamonov wrote about it: "The concept of nationality first appeared in the Germans. They created the "national" concept of artistic creativity. This concept absorbed the minds of the best sons of humanity." In the formation of the modern German language, Johann Christopher Adelung, Brothers Brüder and Wilhelm Grimm had invaluable services. The "Dictionary of the German Language" by the Brothers Grimm is considered the best work in the history of world lexicography. The first edition of the dictionary was published in 1863, and the last edition was published in 1961. The linguist Konrad Alexander Friedrich Duden wrote the grammar of the modern German language at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century. The sources mention that the Jesuit P. Ramus wrote the grammar of the French language in 1562. He also wrote grammars of Greek and Latin. In the next century, D. Wallis wrote the grammar of the English language. Thus, the Jesuits brought new grammatical rules to the languages of European nations. This return was later called an "inflectional feature" by linguists. Friedrich von Schlegel, a German linguist who investigated the origin of languages at the beginning of the 19th century, divided languages into two parts according to their structure; agglutinative and inflected languages. He considered the Turkish language to be agglutinative, and European languages to be inflectional languages. According to F. Schlegel, formants (imagers or prefixes) as the dominant type of word correction and word change in agglutinative languages have only one meaning, and in inflectional languages they have one meaning. But as an inflectional language, the Russian language differs from the Turkish languages in that in Turkish languages modifying and changing suffixes are added mainly to the end of the word root, and in Russian both to the end and to the beginning of the word root. Actually, it's not that big of a difference. There are many such differences between Germanic and Slavic languages, not to mention the differences between Indo-Iranian languages and Germanic and Slavic languages. Although Indo-Iranian languages belong to the same "Indo-European" language family as European languages. Europeans exaggerated every little difference between Turkish and European languages to present Turkish as a "barbarian" language. Recently, many linguists of the world have criticized the theory accepted by Europeans about languages - agglutinated and inflectional division, they have admitted that all languages come from the same root. Famous linguists include Danish H. Pederson, American A. Bomhard, Israeli A. Dolgopolsky, Russian B.A. Dybo and S.A. Starostin believe that Ural - Finnish, Estonian, Hungarian, Mordvin, Udmurt, etc., Altai - Turkish, Mongolian, Manchurian, Korean, Japanese, and Indo-European - Indian, Iranian, Germanic, Celtic, Slavic, etc. the root of their languages is the same. S.A. According to Starostin's calculations, these languages have a common origin. This language is called Nostratic language. It is believed that the separation between the languages occurred about 12,000 years ago and that the common ancestor had an agglutinative structure. It follows that the inflectional-agglutinative division of languages is wrong. All languages come from the same root and as a result of evolution different languages have come into being. Differences in the grammatical structures of languages are related to the characteristics of each language's own formation. It should also be taken into account that the grammar of European languages was written by the Jesuits. So, summarizing what I wrote, we can conclude; As Christianity spread in Europe, Turkic heritage was abandoned, new languages were created, numerous ethnic groups were united around these languages and new European nations were created. The Jesuits led this process.
The thesis, which is widespread today and accepted by European scientists; The thesis is that the R1a subgroup is the 'common gene of the Indo-Europeans, and the R1b subgroup is the common gene of the Turks and other Central Asian peoples and Finn-Yuğra peoples. (1- Anatoly A. Kyosov, Journal of Russian Academy ogf DNA genelogy, 2010 vol. 3No 1 pp.3-58) However, the R gene is a single gene with all its haplogroups and is a 'Turkish gene'. The R1b subgroup is actually highly concentrated in Western Europe and moderately in Central Eurasia and Sub-Sharan in Central Africa, Eastern Europe, Western Asia and Central Asia. The R1b subgroup is 80% Irish, Scots and Welsh; 50-60 percent in Spaniards, Portuguese, French and English; 25-50% in Germans, Dutch, Danes and Norwegians; 25-40% in Italians; 25% in Sweden and Norway; 15% in the Balkan peoples; It is found 10-15% in Poles, 10% in Russians and Ukrainians, 10-15% in Anatolian Turks (25% in Black Sea and Eastern Anatolia regions and 15-25% in Kyrgyz. Rb1 ratios in Central Asian Turks and Fin-Yuğra peoples are very low or there is none. The Rb1 subgroup is quite high among Celtic, Germanic, and Latin peoples who have assimilated Proto-Turkic Peoples such as the Iberian and Aquit peoples in Spain and France, and Finns further north at a low level. This ratio is around 60-80% in the British and Irish islands, for example. In Scandinavian peoples who have heavily assimilated the Finnish peoples, the R1b rate is relatively low, such as 25%. Rb1 is as low as 10-15% in Slavic and Balkan peoples. For Russians, Ukrainians and Polish peoples, this rate is at a very low level, between 0-10%. In Hungarians, this rate is between 0-10%. This subgroup is also between 0-10% in Croats of European Avars origin and Bosnians of Pecheneg origin. R1a is a haplogroup with a high rate in Turks. R1a, 50-70% Central Asian Turks, 50-60% Russians, Ukrainians, Poles and Sorbs (Slavs in Germany), 50-60% Afghans, Pakistanis and North Indians, 20-60% Hungarians; 52% Ashkenazi Jews, 15-30% Scandinavian peoples, 30% Finns, Estlers, Lapps, Baltic people, 15-20% Italians and some areas in northern Spain (this includes the Basque region) 25-60% Dravidians, 10 percent -15% in Tibetans, 15-20% in North Chinese, 15-30% in Germans, 30-40% in Balkan peoples, 20-30% in Caucasian, Anatolian and Iranian peoples. The genetic compositions of today's Turkic peoples are quite different from each other and show a genetic unity. Anatolian Turks also have C, H, I, J, K, O, Q, T chromosomes besides R1a and lesser R1b. The highest gene among Turkic peoples is R Y-DNA. (R1a and R1b) Next comes J Y-DNA. J Y-DNA is a gene carried by Arabs and Semetic Jews, which emerged in the Arabian peninsula about 30,000 years ago, and is divided into 2 subgroups as J1 and J2. This rate is as low as 20% in Ashkenazi Jews of Turkish origin, and they got this gene by mixing with Semetic Jews. There are J2 subgroups at the rate of 10% and 20% among the Anatolian Turks. The genetic composition of Azerbaijan's Iranian Turks is similar to that of Anatolian Turks. In Turkmens in Turkmenistan, on the other hand, R1a is higher and J chromosome is lower than Anatolian and Azerbaijani Turks, while O and Q chromosomes are higher. Among the Turkic peoples in Central Asia, the highest rate of R1a is found in the Kyrgyz Turks with 70 percent. 50-60% of that. KazakhTurks, UygurTurks, and UzbekTurks, MongolTurks and TibetTurks, this rate is around 10-15%. All Central Asian peoples have C, I, J, K, O, Q chromosomes, but the J chromosome is very low in these peoples. However, C Chromosome is found at very high levels in KazakTurks, MogolTurks, KirgizTurks, UygurTurks and UzbekTurks. Other peoples carrying this chromosome are Tunguses, Koreans and Japanese. Tibetans also carry about 40% of the D chromosome. This chromosome is found in other Central Asian Peoples at very low rates. Another people who carry this chromosome at a high rate like the Tibetans are the Aynos, the oldest people of the Japanese islands. The issue that confuses European scientists is that the R1a subgroup is found in Russians, Ukrainians, Poles, Pakistanis; It is very high in Afghans and north Indians. This is quite natural actually. The lands where these peoples live are the old lands where the Turks have established strong lands for centuries. If we look at the maps of these Turkish states, it can be easily seen that these maps overlap with the R1a maps. This is the only reason why these populations have high levels of R1a. The Turks living in these lands became new peoples by mixing with other peoples who did not migrate from these lands when their states were disintegrated. It is not known on what the European scientists base the thesis that the R1a subgroup is the common gene of 'Indo-Europeans' and the R1b group is the common gene of Turks and other Central Asian peoples and Finn-Ygra peoples (Fins, Estonians, Lapps), but it is found in Turkish and other Central Asian peoples and Phoenician peoples. the higher gene is not R1b, but the R1a subgroup. R1b is at very low levels. This 'strangeness' is explained by European scholars as 'the Turks carry a high rate of R1a because they assimilated the Iranian Peoples in Central Asia in the 4th and 11th centuries' (2 origins, age, spread and ethnic association of European Haplogroups and subclades) However, there is no record that the Turks erased the 'Central Asian Iranians' from history in the 4th and 11th centuries. If one can show records, evidence, etc., of course, it would be very appropriate. In addition, R1a is high not only in Turks, but also in Caucasian peoples living in the Caucasus and Dravidian peoples living in southern India. Also, if R1a is a Turkish gene, why is it 60-80% found in British, French, Spanish, and Celts? It must be Ahhuns (Sakalar, Kushans or Ak Sakalar) or Tagars (Tohars) that European scientists mean by Iranians in Central Asia. The Tağars established a powerful state in the present-day Shanxi and Kansu provinces of China between 300 BC and 20 BC. However, European historians claim that the Tagars were 'Indo-European'. No 'Indo-European' state was established in Central Asia, neither in 300 BC nor in the following centuries. There are no archaeological findings proving this. there are only dry claims. There was only a small number of people of Indian origin, who spread to present-day Southern Turkestan (Afghanistan and then to East Turkestan, and then melted down among the Uyghurs) around 500 AD. The descendants of this people are texts written in Brahmi script from the period between 500 AD and 700 AD. It is understood that they spoke an Indian language that has become extinct.European historians and archaeologists have found thousands of years old in central Asia. They claim that they were descended from 'Indo-European tohars' because their mummies were auburn-blonde and their clothing resembled those of the Celtic peoples. However, the People of Indian origin, whom they call the Tohars, are not brown-haired, but a dark people like today's Indians, and their migration date to Central Asia is very late. These mummies are from the Turks. In addition, it is natural that these oldest clothes of the Turks are seen in the Celts, an early Turkish people. It is not surprising that the Turks were brown-blonde before mixing with other peoples.
The region that the Romans called Germania is the region of Central and Northern Europe, which is the north of the Roman country. The tribes living in the Germania region at that time were the Turks, the westernmost Sak (Scythian) tribes, and they had been living in this region for centuries. Many Turkish tribes lived in Germany, who could not unite among themselves. The most important of these were: 1. This name, which is mentioned as Alamanni in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word ala, which means mixed color ALAMAN. 2. This name, which is mentioned as Angli in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word ANGIL, which means all / whole. 3. This name, which is mentioned as Axones or Saxones in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word AKAN, which means flowing, flocking. 4. This name, which is mentioned as Baiuvari in Roman sources, has been transformed from the words BAYU VAR, which means being rich, having wealth in Old Turkish. 5. This name, which is mentioned as Burgundi or Burgundiones in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish words BURKUNT, which means to scare, and BURKUNTAN, which means frightening. 6. This name, which is mentioned as Buri in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word BÜR, which means buran, buren, büzen. (Shirring) 7. This name, which is mentioned as Chaedini in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word KADING, which means beech, hard and beech tree. 8. This name, which is mentioned as Cherusci in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word KERİŞÇİ, which means quarrelsome, warrior. 9. This name, which is mentioned as Dani in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word TAN (skin), meaning long, wide and trunk. 10. This name, which is mentioned as Franci in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word BURANG, which means gust / storm. 11. This name, which is mentioned as Frisi in Roman sources, has been transformed from the word BIRİŞ, which means compound in Old Turkish. 12. This name, which is mentioned as Gepidae in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word KEPİT, which means large, bulging, large. 13. This name, which is mentioned as Rugi in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word URUG, which means ancestry, seed. 14. This name, which is mentioned as Suione in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word SUYAN, which means throwing, throwing, flowing. 15. This name, which is mentioned as Thuringi in Roman sources, has been transformed from the word TURING, which means quarrelsome in Old Turkish. 16. This name, which is mentioned as Vandili in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word BANDAL, which means thick stick. 17. This name, which is mentioned as Vinnili in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word MINGLIG (thousand / thousand). 18. This name, which was mentioned as Suebi in Roman sources, has been transformed into SUBI, which means long and pointed object in Old Turkish.
The book brings a fresh perspective into a stagnated view of the Turkic nations and their past. Primarily based on the genetic findings, backed by the archeological, historical, linguistic facts and testimonies of the ancient scholars, historians, and geographers, this work reveals breaking new evidence about the biblical origins of the Turkic nations who were related to the ancient Akkadians, Sumerians. It unshrouds the Turkic pedigree of the Germanic nations, the natives of ancient Media, and the Scythians. The deciphered cuneiforms of the Behistun inscription in Persia, along with their detailed lexico-grammatical analysis shed light on the revolutionary facts about the Turkic origin of the Medes and their language. A large portion of this volume is devoted to the Scythians and most of their derivative tribes, including those located in Scythia and beyond, such as the As, Sacai, Parthians, Bactrians, Huns, Sarmats, Getai, Celtic, Iberian, Gallic, Germanic, and Thracian tribes - the Trojans with a detailed classification of the related tribes, including the most renowned Illyrians, Spartans, Phrygians, Etruscans, Pelasgi. The in-depth lexico-grammatical analyses of the languages of two major Thracian nations - the Etruscans and the Phrygians ascertain their Turkic origin. The book also demystifies the history of the ancient Armenians who were a Phrygian colony, sets them apart from the modern Armenians, and gives a chronological, historical account of the modern Armenian people, also known as the Hays, under the authority of their first historian Movses Khorenatsi. The comparative analyses of 20 ancient alphabets reveal their (Armenians) common Turkic root. Crucial archeological, cultural, political, linguistic, and genetic evidence points to the Turkic beginning of many Native Americans. Among the numerous quotes from the ancient statesmen and reputable scholars, Dr. A. Sanducci brings forward the statement made by the father of Swedish Historiography prof. Sven Lagerbring: "Our ancestors are Turks who are comrades of Odin. We have got enough evidence on this subject... Odin and his comrades were Turks... We, the Germanic people, are in origin, are Turks. We must not be ashamed of this fact. The Turks are a very honorable and proud people." ............................... Sanducci, A. Having an extensive academic background in Turkic Studies, a former visiting professor to UC Berkeley, USA, Dr. A. Sanducci - the author of the research "Ancient Scholars about the Turks and the Turkic Nations", as well as of many other educational books and articles, gave speeches and lectures in many prestigious Universities worldwide, including Stanford University and UC Davis. Sanducci, A.
Tranformation Of The Turks/Tatars (Saka/Scythians) into Frisians/Dutch (Part of the people Living İn Holland/Netherlands) Birişler: This name, which is mentioned as Frisi in Roman sources, It has been transformed from the word biriş, which means united in Turkish. old Old Pliny (23-79 AD), the lands of Turkish tribe were covered with forests. He writes that they lived by farming and feeding cattle. In the late 1st century BC, the Romans living in near the ren the east of Lake Flevo, in the region extending from they called the Great Frisi, and those living in the west were called the Little Frisi. Birişler are the one of the ancestor of the present-day Dutch nation called Holland/Netherlands With Angli AND SUEBİS... OTHER TURKİC TRİBES.
De culturele kennis 10/10
Hij is echt geweldig. Lijkt wel of hij ieder cultuur van waar ook ter wereld heeft bestudeerd.
😂😂
Een rotterdammer zijn doet dat al eigenlijk met je voordat je het door hebt 😂
😂😂😂 Ik ken geen andere autotochtone Nederland die zo veel kennis heeft over andere culturen. Heel verfrissend om te zien een keertje. Zijn videos bewijzen dat een multiculturele samenleving veel interessanter is. Bedankt aan Nederland dat iedereen hier wordt accepteerd en grotendeels gerespecteerd. Ik ben erg dankbaar aan Nederland en Nderlanders. Ik bedoel je wilt niet wonen in een land zoals Amerika....
Hij is half Pools dat zal ook wel een rol spelen.
Behalve als je van Joodse komaf bent. Dan ben je alleen veilig in Israël.
"Ik heb niets aan u gevraagd hé!" HEEERLIJK
Hahaha Kor hoe the f ken jii dat verhaal over Adana en op de zon schieten. Wtf man, je verbaast me iedere keer weer 😂😂😂😂
Mad respect dat hij dit weet over Adana
Bro dat is gewoon algemene kennis als je dit niet weet moet je echt terug naar school
@@dannymrslime4961 als Turk kan ik je vertellen dat dit echt geen algemene kennis is in Nederland. Waar haal jij je algemene kennis vandaan? 🤣
Algemene kennis???? Whahahhahahahaha
Ik vind t knap wat je neer weet te zetten in verbinding met je publiek. Kudos man.
origin of european people2
In 1778, F.G. Karin wrote in his "Letter about translators of the Russian language": "The terrible difference between our language and the Slavic language often prevents us from expressing ourselves in the Slavic language except for everyday conversation... After our language was adapted to the Slavic language, the situation became quite shameful."
In the same century, Johann Christian Dahl, a Danish linguist of German origin, came to Russia at the invitation of Catherine II, where he was busy organizing library work. He changed his name to Ivan Matveevich Dal. His son, Vladimir Ivanovich Dal, born in 1801, became not only a Russian citizen, but also a great Russian poet. In addition to Latin, German, French, he also knew Turkish, Tatar and Kazakh languages. He had invaluable services in the formation of the Russian language, in 1840 he wrote the "Explanatory Dictionary of the Great Russian Language". At first the dictionary was banned, but it was republished in 1863 and 1880.In this dictionary, V. Dal gave the beginning of Russian words from European languages, that is, he "proved" that Russian words originated from European words. In the last copy, the word "great Russian language" was replaced by the word "Russian language".
Linguist Gil Nail Favilovich (Bashkir) writes about this dictionary: "I was not surprised when I opened the book 'Ancient Turkic Dictionary' near the Luhansk Cossack... Russian words of ancient Turkic origin. Having studied this rare scientific work up and down, I came to a shocking conclusion - it turns out that there was no Russian language in ancient times. This is a phantom. The calculation here is quite simple: if we remove the words Western European, Turkish and Finnish from this book, the book will remain empty pages."
After 1880, this dictionary was repeatedly edited. One of the editors of the dictionary was the Frenchman Ivan Alexandrovich Baudouin de Courtenay, a descendant of King Louis VI. At the beginning of the 20th century, he completed V. I. Dal's dictionary, became a master of history and philology and a doctor of history in Russia.
When you get acquainted with this information, it becomes clear that there was no Russian language in the 17th century, and the peoples living here spoke Finno-Ugric and Proto-Bulgarian languages. If there was no Russian language, then there was no Russian people. In the 18th-19th centuries, the Slovene language of the Rusyns living in the territory of Rech-Pospolita was "enriched" with European, Finno-Ugric and Proto-Bulgarian languages, and the Russian language was created, and as the local Finno-Urogs and Tatars/Turks spoke this language, they gradually became Russified. The Proto-Bulgarian language was later called the Church-Slavic language.
Russian literary critic and publicist V. G. Belinsky wrote about the difficulty of the Russian language in 1875: "But such progress is possible not only for the young Russian language, which is still in its infancy in every respect, but also for the French language, which is two centuries old... Writing letters in Russian , it's just a pain, the wording is harsh, the grammar and seminary smell, the translations are awkward. If you can't find a Russian equivalent, write the French one, and a good translation will be obtained in the meantime."
Thus, we can consider the XVIII-XIX centuries as the period when the Russian language and the Russian people were formed.
During this period, the language problem was everywhere in Europe. Due to the spread of Christianity, the Turks were exterminated and the Turkish language gradually disappeared. Instead, new languages and, of course, new peoples appeared. English historian E. Gibbon wrote in the 18th century, referring to the Greek language: "A dictionary was published to explain many words, where they gave the Greek beginning to the word "barbarian". With this quote, E. Gibbon indirectly admits the Greekization of Turkish words. It turns out that the formation of the Greek language and people took place in this period - in the XVIII-XIX centuries.
Turkish historian Ulgan Zaki Ok writes about the Greekization of Turkish words: "The names of many historical cities, rivers and mountains in Europe, especially those ending with "-assa, -assos, -anda, -anthos" are of Luvian origin." From the words of the author, it is understood that new Greek words were created by adding these endings to names of places, rivers and mountains of Luvian origin.
Sources attribute the emergence of the new German language to the 17th century. But the scientists who carried out this work lived in the 18th-19th centuries. In the 18th century, genius philosophers Immanuel Kant, Johann Georg Hamann, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and William Shakespeare played an indispensable role in the formation of German public consciousness.
Johann Georg Hamann was the ideologist of the literary movement "Strikers". The theorist of the group was Johann Gottfried Herder. He wrote a treatise "On the Origin of Languages". Young German poets gathered around him. This group formed the "Society for the Study of Early German History". Under their influence, brilliant philosophers such as Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Friedrich Nietzsche, and John Stuart Mill grew up. In 1826, nationalist-historian Heinrich Duden wrote a course "On the study of national history".
A generation of German historians grew up who described almost the entire past of Europe around Germany. Historian Boron von Stein created a collection of resources and explained his commitment quite simply: "I want to develop the course of German history, facilitate its study, and thereby strengthen love for the fatherland, our society and our great ancestors."
A.S. Artamonov wrote about it: "The concept of nationality first appeared in the Germans. They created the "national" concept of artistic creativity. This concept absorbed the minds of the best sons of humanity."
In the formation of the modern German language, Johann Christopher Adelung, Brothers Brüder and Wilhelm Grimm had invaluable services. The "Dictionary of the German Language" by the Brothers Grimm is considered the best work in the history of world lexicography. The first edition of the dictionary was published in 1863, and the last edition was published in 1961. The linguist Konrad Alexander Friedrich Duden wrote the grammar of the modern German language at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century.
The sources mention that the Jesuit P. Ramus wrote the grammar of the French language in 1562. He also wrote grammars of Greek and Latin. In the next century, D. Wallis wrote the grammar of the English language. Thus, the Jesuits brought new grammatical rules to the languages of European nations. This return was later called an "inflectional feature" by linguists.
Friedrich von Schlegel, a German linguist who investigated the origin of languages at the beginning of the 19th century, divided languages into two parts according to their structure; agglutinative and inflected languages. He considered the Turkish language to be agglutinative, and European languages to be inflectional languages.
According to F. Schlegel, formants (imagers or prefixes) as the dominant type of word correction and word change in agglutinative languages have only one meaning, and in inflectional languages they have one meaning.
But as an inflectional language, the Russian language differs from the Turkish languages in that in Turkish languages modifying and changing suffixes are added mainly to the end of the word root, and in Russian both to the end and to the beginning of the word root. Actually, it's not that big of a difference. There are many such differences between Germanic and Slavic languages, not to mention the differences between Indo-Iranian languages and Germanic and Slavic languages. Although Indo-Iranian languages belong to the same "Indo-European" language family as European languages.
Europeans exaggerated every little difference between Turkish and European languages to present Turkish as a "barbarian" language.
Recently, many linguists of the world have criticized the theory accepted by Europeans about languages - agglutinated and inflectional division, they have admitted that all languages come from the same root. Famous linguists include Danish H. Pederson, American A. Bomhard, Israeli A. Dolgopolsky, Russian B.A. Dybo and S.A. Starostin believe that Ural - Finnish, Estonian, Hungarian, Mordvin, Udmurt, etc., Altai - Turkish, Mongolian, Manchurian, Korean, Japanese, and Indo-European - Indian, Iranian, Germanic, Celtic, Slavic, etc. the root of their languages is the same. S.A. According to Starostin's calculations, these languages have a common origin. This language is called Nostratic language. It is believed that the separation between the languages occurred about 12,000 years ago and that the common ancestor had an agglutinative structure.
It follows that the inflectional-agglutinative division of languages is wrong. All languages come from the same root and as a result of evolution different languages have come into being. Differences in the grammatical structures of languages are related to the characteristics of each language's own formation. It should also be taken into account that the grammar of European languages was written by the Jesuits.
So, summarizing what I wrote, we can conclude; As Christianity spread in Europe, Turkic heritage was abandoned, new languages were created, numerous ethnic groups were united around these languages and new European nations were created. The Jesuits led this process.
Ik verheug me weer enorm op de voorstelling in Eindhoven op 21 november! Gelukkig zit ik niet vooraan 🙂
Thanks dat je weer naar Kordaat gaat!
Cor, noteer je haar naam even voor 21/11?😌
@@EduardDumee Cor heet Kor, Edward.. 🙂 en dank voor je suggestie. Ik voel ineens een griepje opkomen voor volgende maand.. sorry Kor ;-)
Maakt niet uit waar je zit, zaklampje werkt prima om alle rijen te bereiken.
@@Michael-tg9vt Maakt niet uit. Ik ga verkleed als theaterstoel.
Hij rijd zelfs bij z’n werk Mercedes
The thesis, which is widespread today and accepted by European scientists; The thesis is that the R1a subgroup is the 'common gene of the Indo-Europeans, and the R1b subgroup is the common gene of the Turks and other Central Asian peoples and Finn-Yuğra peoples. (1- Anatoly A. Kyosov, Journal of Russian Academy ogf DNA genelogy, 2010 vol. 3No 1 pp.3-58)
However, the R gene is a single gene with all its haplogroups and is a 'Turkish gene'. The R1b subgroup is actually highly concentrated in Western Europe and moderately in Central Eurasia and Sub-Sharan in Central Africa, Eastern Europe, Western Asia and Central Asia.
The R1b subgroup is 80% Irish, Scots and Welsh; 50-60 percent in Spaniards, Portuguese, French and English; 25-50% in Germans, Dutch, Danes and Norwegians; 25-40% in Italians; 25% in Sweden and Norway; 15% in the Balkan peoples; It is found 10-15% in Poles, 10% in Russians and Ukrainians, 10-15% in Anatolian Turks (25% in Black Sea and Eastern Anatolia regions and 15-25% in Kyrgyz. Rb1 ratios in Central Asian Turks and Fin-Yuğra peoples are very low or there is none.
The Rb1 subgroup is quite high among Celtic, Germanic, and Latin peoples who have assimilated Proto-Turkic Peoples such as the Iberian and Aquit peoples in Spain and France, and Finns further north at a low level. This ratio is around 60-80% in the British and Irish islands, for example. In Scandinavian peoples who have heavily assimilated the Finnish peoples, the R1b rate is relatively low, such as 25%.
Rb1 is as low as 10-15% in Slavic and Balkan peoples. For Russians, Ukrainians and Polish peoples, this rate is at a very low level, between 0-10%. In Hungarians, this rate is between 0-10%. This subgroup is also between 0-10% in Croats of European Avars origin and Bosnians of Pecheneg origin.
R1a is a haplogroup with a high rate in Turks. R1a, 50-70% Central Asian Turks, 50-60% Russians, Ukrainians, Poles and Sorbs (Slavs in Germany), 50-60% Afghans, Pakistanis and North Indians, 20-60% Hungarians; 52% Ashkenazi Jews, 15-30% Scandinavian peoples, 30% Finns, Estlers, Lapps, Baltic people, 15-20% Italians and some areas in northern Spain (this includes the Basque region) 25-60% Dravidians, 10 percent -15% in Tibetans, 15-20% in North Chinese, 15-30% in Germans, 30-40% in Balkan peoples, 20-30% in Caucasian, Anatolian and Iranian peoples.
The genetic compositions of today's Turkic peoples are quite different from each other and show a genetic unity.
Anatolian Turks also have C, H, I, J, K, O, Q, T chromosomes besides R1a and lesser R1b. The highest gene among Turkic peoples is R Y-DNA. (R1a and R1b) Next comes J Y-DNA. J Y-DNA is a gene carried by Arabs and Semetic Jews, which emerged in the Arabian peninsula about 30,000 years ago, and is divided into 2 subgroups as J1 and J2. This rate is as low as 20% in Ashkenazi Jews of Turkish origin, and they got this gene by mixing with Semetic Jews. There are J2 subgroups at the rate of 10% and 20% among the Anatolian Turks. The genetic composition of Azerbaijan's Iranian Turks is similar to that of Anatolian Turks. In Turkmens in Turkmenistan, on the other hand, R1a is higher and J chromosome is lower than Anatolian and Azerbaijani Turks, while O and Q chromosomes are higher. Among the Turkic peoples in Central Asia, the highest rate of R1a is found in the Kyrgyz Turks with 70 percent. 50-60% of that. KazakhTurks, UygurTurks, and UzbekTurks, MongolTurks and TibetTurks, this rate is around 10-15%. All Central Asian peoples have C, I, J, K, O, Q chromosomes, but the J chromosome is very low in these peoples.
However, C Chromosome is found at very high levels in KazakTurks, MogolTurks, KirgizTurks, UygurTurks and UzbekTurks. Other peoples carrying this chromosome are Tunguses, Koreans and Japanese. Tibetans also carry about 40% of the D chromosome. This chromosome is found in other Central Asian Peoples at very low rates. Another people who carry this chromosome at a high rate like the Tibetans are the Aynos, the oldest people of the Japanese islands.
The issue that confuses European scientists is that the R1a subgroup is found in Russians, Ukrainians, Poles, Pakistanis; It is very high in Afghans and north Indians. This is quite natural actually. The lands where these peoples live are the old lands where the Turks have established strong lands for centuries. If we look at the maps of these Turkish states, it can be easily seen that these maps overlap with the R1a maps. This is the only reason why these populations have high levels of R1a. The Turks living in these lands became new peoples by mixing with other peoples who did not migrate from these lands when their states were disintegrated. It is not known on what the European scientists base the thesis that the R1a subgroup is the common gene of 'Indo-Europeans' and the R1b group is the common gene of Turks and other Central Asian peoples and Finn-Ygra peoples (Fins, Estonians, Lapps), but it is found in Turkish and other Central Asian peoples and Phoenician peoples. the higher gene is not R1b, but the R1a subgroup. R1b is at very low levels. This 'strangeness' is explained by European scholars as 'the Turks carry a high rate of R1a because they assimilated the Iranian Peoples in Central Asia in the 4th and 11th centuries' (2 origins, age, spread and ethnic association of European Haplogroups and subclades)
However, there is no record that the Turks erased the 'Central Asian Iranians' from history in the 4th and 11th centuries. If one can show records, evidence, etc., of course, it would be very appropriate. In addition, R1a is high not only in Turks, but also in Caucasian peoples living in the Caucasus and Dravidian peoples living in southern India. Also, if R1a is a Turkish gene, why is it 60-80% found in British, French, Spanish, and Celts?
It must be Ahhuns (Sakalar, Kushans or Ak Sakalar) or Tagars (Tohars) that European scientists mean by Iranians in Central Asia. The Tağars established a powerful state in the present-day Shanxi and Kansu provinces of China between 300 BC and 20 BC. However, European historians claim that the Tagars were 'Indo-European'. No 'Indo-European' state was established in Central Asia, neither in 300 BC nor in the following centuries. There are no archaeological findings proving this. there are only dry claims. There was only a small number of people of Indian origin, who spread to present-day Southern Turkestan (Afghanistan and then to East Turkestan, and then melted down among the Uyghurs) around 500 AD. The descendants of this people are texts written in Brahmi script from the period between 500 AD and 700 AD. It is understood that they spoke an Indian language that has become extinct.European historians and archaeologists have found thousands of years old in central Asia.
They claim that they were descended from 'Indo-European tohars' because their mummies were auburn-blonde and their clothing resembled those of the Celtic peoples. However, the People of Indian origin, whom they call the Tohars, are not brown-haired, but a dark people like today's Indians, and their migration date to Central Asia is very late.
These mummies are from the Turks. In addition, it is natural that these oldest clothes of the Turks are seen in the Celts, an early Turkish people. It is not surprising that the Turks were brown-blonde before mixing with other peoples.
0:19 stöp politie😂
The region that the Romans called Germania is the region of Central and Northern Europe, which is the north of the Roman country.
The tribes living in the Germania region at that time were the Turks, the westernmost Sak (Scythian) tribes, and they had been living in this region for centuries.
Many Turkish tribes lived in Germany, who could not unite among themselves. The most important of these were:
1. This name, which is mentioned as Alamanni in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word ala, which means mixed color ALAMAN.
2. This name, which is mentioned as Angli in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word ANGIL, which means all / whole.
3. This name, which is mentioned as Axones or Saxones in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word AKAN, which means flowing, flocking.
4. This name, which is mentioned as Baiuvari in Roman sources, has been transformed from the words BAYU VAR, which means being rich, having wealth in Old Turkish.
5. This name, which is mentioned as Burgundi or Burgundiones in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish words BURKUNT, which means to scare, and BURKUNTAN, which means frightening.
6. This name, which is mentioned as Buri in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word BÜR, which means buran, buren, büzen. (Shirring)
7. This name, which is mentioned as Chaedini in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word KADING, which means beech, hard and beech tree.
8. This name, which is mentioned as Cherusci in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word KERİŞÇİ, which means quarrelsome, warrior.
9. This name, which is mentioned as Dani in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word TAN (skin), meaning long, wide and trunk.
10. This name, which is mentioned as Franci in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word BURANG, which means gust / storm.
11. This name, which is mentioned as Frisi in Roman sources, has been transformed from the word BIRİŞ, which means compound in Old Turkish.
12. This name, which is mentioned as Gepidae in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word KEPİT, which means large, bulging, large.
13. This name, which is mentioned as Rugi in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word URUG, which means ancestry, seed.
14. This name, which is mentioned as Suione in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word SUYAN, which means throwing, throwing, flowing.
15. This name, which is mentioned as Thuringi in Roman sources, has been transformed from the word TURING, which means quarrelsome in Old Turkish.
16. This name, which is mentioned as Vandili in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word BANDAL, which means thick stick.
17. This name, which is mentioned as Vinnili in Roman sources, has been transformed from the Old Turkish word MINGLIG (thousand / thousand).
18. This name, which was mentioned as Suebi in Roman sources, has been transformed into SUBI, which means long and pointed object in Old Turkish.
Goed bezig Kor.
The book brings a fresh perspective into a stagnated view of the Turkic nations and their past.
Primarily based on the genetic findings, backed by the archeological, historical, linguistic facts and testimonies of the ancient scholars, historians, and geographers, this work reveals breaking new evidence about the biblical origins of the Turkic nations who were related to the ancient Akkadians, Sumerians.
It unshrouds the Turkic pedigree of the Germanic nations, the natives of ancient Media, and the Scythians.
The deciphered cuneiforms of the Behistun inscription in Persia, along with their detailed lexico-grammatical analysis shed light on the revolutionary facts about the Turkic origin of the Medes and their language.
A large portion of this volume is devoted to the Scythians and most of their derivative tribes, including those located in Scythia and beyond, such as the As, Sacai, Parthians, Bactrians, Huns, Sarmats, Getai, Celtic, Iberian, Gallic, Germanic, and Thracian tribes - the Trojans with a detailed classification of the related tribes, including the most renowned Illyrians, Spartans, Phrygians, Etruscans, Pelasgi.
The in-depth lexico-grammatical analyses of the languages of two major Thracian nations - the Etruscans and the Phrygians ascertain their Turkic origin.
The book also demystifies the history of the ancient Armenians who were a Phrygian colony, sets them apart from the modern Armenians, and gives a chronological, historical account of the modern Armenian people, also known as the Hays, under the authority of their first historian Movses Khorenatsi.
The comparative analyses of 20 ancient alphabets reveal their (Armenians) common Turkic root.
Crucial archeological, cultural, political, linguistic, and genetic evidence points to the Turkic beginning of many Native Americans.
Among the numerous quotes from the ancient statesmen and reputable scholars, Dr. A. Sanducci brings forward the statement made by the father of Swedish Historiography prof. Sven Lagerbring: "Our ancestors are Turks who are comrades of Odin.
We have got enough evidence on this subject...
Odin and his comrades were Turks...
We, the Germanic people, are in origin, are Turks.
We must not be ashamed of this fact. The Turks are a very honorable and proud people."
...............................
Sanducci, A.
Having an extensive academic background in Turkic Studies, a former visiting professor to UC Berkeley, USA, Dr. A. Sanducci - the author of the research "Ancient Scholars about the Turks and the Turkic Nations", as well as of many other educational books and articles, gave speeches and lectures in many prestigious Universities worldwide, including Stanford University and UC Davis.
Sanducci, A.
Tranformation Of The Turks/Tatars (Saka/Scythians) into Frisians/Dutch (Part of the people Living İn Holland/Netherlands)
Birişler: This name, which is mentioned as Frisi in Roman sources,
It has been transformed from the word biriş, which means united in Turkish. old
Old Pliny (23-79 AD), the lands of Turkish tribe were covered with forests.
He writes that they lived by farming and feeding cattle.
In the late 1st century BC, the Romans
living in near the ren the east of Lake Flevo, in the region extending from they called the Great Frisi, and those living in the west were called the Little Frisi.
Birişler are the one of the ancestor of the present-day Dutch nation called Holland/Netherlands With Angli AND SUEBİS... OTHER TURKİC TRİBES.
Geweldig!
Poh wat heb ik genoten van de vernedering van die politie agent had je door moeten pakken kleedkamer .. en alle kleren uit en handboeien 🤣🤣
Ik vind jou een topper!
Geweldig!!
Yo misschien domme vraag maar... doen ze dat echt?
Ja natuurlijk. Het is toch minder warm nu?
@@stejer211Schieten op de zon zorgt alleen maar voor meer opwarming 😂😂 @TS: ja is een keer gebeurd.
Grqppig??
Ge
Wel
Dig
!!!!!!!!
Haha idd
vind iemand dit humor ???????
Heb jij wel smaak? Die heb je niet te pakken zo te horen. Misschien even langs Adana, kan je schieten op de zon🤣
Huh is dit een Nederlandse zin ???
@@JM-de7yn Ben jij Psyduck ????
@@joeyking5432geen idee of alles in orde is met jou maar lul maar lekker tegen iemand anders