FINALLY someone who explains with an example and concisely. Everywhere else it was left at just the equation, which never helps in my case. You have no idea how much you helped me out with this.
Awesome video! Thank you! Now I finally understood stood how to use SOR. I also highly appreciate you saying the optimum value for w which is 1.1. Very helpful!
Gauss-Seidel is not always better than Jacobi. There are examples when Gauss-Seidel doesn't even converge, and Jacobi does, and sometimes Jacobi converges faster than Gauss-Seidel. It depends on the spectral radius of the matrix in the iteration.
Well that's a good question there is a practical answer which is you have to experiment and play with a few values till you get the best result. So that would work for assignments or projects. Exam wise only a very cruel professor would ask you to figure it out. I would give the value of w. Hope the answer helps.
FINALLY someone who explains with an example and concisely. Everywhere else it was left at just the equation, which never helps in my case. You have no idea how much you helped me out with this.
I've been trying to understand the SOR formula for a while, and finally i got it! Thank you :)!
5/5 on my numerical analysis quiz. HUGE!♥ Thank you!
✨✨The best video i found on UA-cam for SOR METHOD,✨✨ THANKS A LOT 👍👍
Awesome video! Thank you! Now I finally understood stood how to use SOR. I also highly appreciate you saying the optimum value for w which is 1.1. Very helpful!
I searched everywhere but this video cleared me, 10**6 thanks!
Clear, and to the point. Great work
It's really helpful! Thanks for explanation!
This was extremely helpful. Thanks.
Superb vedio
Upto the point
Gauss-Seidel is not always better than Jacobi. There are examples when Gauss-Seidel doesn't even converge, and Jacobi does, and sometimes Jacobi converges faster than Gauss-Seidel. It depends on the spectral radius of the matrix in the iteration.
Thank you. very clear explanation
Thank you Sir :)
how could you derivate from Gauss-Seidel into the SOR fotmula?
You get Gauss-Seidel when you put omega=1
How did u find the optimal relaxation factor? I.E omega.?? Please reply..
Yes, important point
@@rohitrai6187 I think he just chose a number greater than 1.
Hello, how can i Solve under relaxation????
thank you this is really helpfull
Thank you sir
thank you
thank you , i have a question: how to choose w?
Well that's a good question there is a practical answer which is you have to experiment and play with a few values till you get the best result. So that would work for assignments or projects. Exam wise only a very cruel professor would ask you to figure it out. I would give the value of w. Hope the answer helps.
Alright now i understand, yes you did help clarifying it to me, God Bless you.
where is w/aii ? as the formula said that. but you just multiplied it by w? or is that acceptable?
I have the same question as well!
Thank you so much sir...If possible please share MATLAB code for System of ode using SOR..
THANKS SIR.................
If w is not given how can we find w????
w has to be decided by the user, depending on the system. It decides the rate of convergence.
22 bot vdia
Sorry I don't understand is there a question you have or an error
please, can you explain how we go from (sor )to (gsm)?
@@the-Math-guy It's in punjabi
22=bai=brother
bot vdia=very good
Thank you Sir :)