These Kamikaze Drones Were Used In Iran’s First Direct Attack on Israel | WSJ Equipped

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @wsj
    @wsj  18 днів тому +75

    Israel launches large-scale raids targeting militants in West Bank: on.wsj.com/476Y1Ru

    • @haneefsheikh1535
      @haneefsheikh1535 18 днів тому +140

      Not militants but the common people

    • @jeremiasrobinson
      @jeremiasrobinson 18 днів тому

      WSJ, stop lying. This is what your headline should say: "Israel launches large-scale raids targeting CIVILIANS in West Bank"

    • @mrrolandlawrence
      @mrrolandlawrence 18 днів тому +11

      @@haneefsheikh1535 well the article is quite clear... if you have no one left in the region, then you have no militants. infallible logic there.

    • @God-ub8fn
      @God-ub8fn 18 днів тому +70

      5 YEAR old militants

    • @evergreatest5821
      @evergreatest5821 18 днів тому +13

      @@haneefsheikh1535 when common people wont have weapon chaches in their house and piles of breaking bad type explosives... theyll be common people....

  • @muhammadahsanfarooq7121
    @muhammadahsanfarooq7121 17 днів тому +739

    In 1979 US Said no one sell weapon to IRAN and in 2022 US says no one buy weapon from IRAN

  • @danwelterweight4137
    @danwelterweight4137 16 днів тому +383

    If you asked an American defense company to manufacture these they would cost $1 million each at the very minimum.

    • @Efendi-000
      @Efendi-000 15 днів тому +13

      Even though you`re right,, US is also NOT paying by Tax $$$, But newly printed $$$.

    • @simonschneider5913
      @simonschneider5913 15 днів тому +15

      @@Efendi-000 true!...but in the end, all debts are paid. via inflation, or taxes, or conscription.

    • @WalkOverHotCoal
      @WalkOverHotCoal 14 днів тому +8

      The Pentagon would begin with a team of experts before a single unit is built. There would be a Occupational, Health and safety department. Then environmental impact studies. Followed by noise impacts studies. Then the contractor took the money and skipped the country. All these would negatively affect the production cost !

    • @RealGigaMind
      @RealGigaMind 14 днів тому +8

      To keep the private contractors's pockets fat.

    • @rockpadstudios
      @rockpadstudios 13 днів тому +8

      It took years and many expensive attempts to make a reliable US drone. I've heard they finally brought in a toy RC plane engineer to help. Billions were wasted on the US drones.

  • @Cesco_S
    @Cesco_S 18 днів тому +941

    So basically, no one anticipated the need to defend against cheap, slow and loud drones 😂. All the equipment is built to fight an advanced war …

    • @KamBar2020
      @KamBar2020 18 днів тому +18

      Those drones heavily infested with Cheaper Components and Materials from 🇨🇳

    • @sslelgamal5206
      @sslelgamal5206 18 днів тому +117

      *All the equipment is built to fight an "expensive" war! US weapons are there to make money, not winning the wars! I hope US taxpayers are okay with that!

    • @kamranahoora7670
      @kamranahoora7670 18 днів тому +9

      Only this is not used.
      There are several layers and the purpose of war.
      this type is to empty the air defense missiles and engage the defense systems.
      First read properly.

    • @AL-lh2ht
      @AL-lh2ht 18 днів тому +7

      uh noo. anti-missels will never be as cheaper as regular missiles.

    • @GenJuhru
      @GenJuhru 17 днів тому +15

      That "cheap" part is not a disadvantage.

  • @wasimshaikh1665
    @wasimshaikh1665 18 днів тому +1140

    $50,000 per unit ? Bruh where you're getting your data ?? Most Iranian sources claims it to be around 10 to 15k. There is nothing in that machine to cost 50k.

    • @thenameisblu
      @thenameisblu 18 днів тому +70

      Perhaps export price?

    • @DistrustHumanz
      @DistrustHumanz 18 днів тому +244

      The Western military industrial complex will have to produce similar drones since they are so effective. If they admit they are that cheap to produce, they won't be able to make as much profit when they make their own.

    • @KamBar2020
      @KamBar2020 18 днів тому +4

      Supplied with Components and Materials from 🇨🇳

    • @dayner989
      @dayner989 18 днів тому

      They know that.. it just that they want to justify the price needed to shoot them down they cant make a missle for 10k to shoot these drones down. So they lie

    • @rewardilicious
      @rewardilicious 18 днів тому +39

      @@thenameisblu nah "experts" claim them to be INITIALLY $20K to $50K to make, so with R&D costs, so they took the higher end estimate of "expert" estimates. Export price is $193K. And Russia producing them domestically with the improvements is estimated at $48K. But Iran makes them for around $10K to $15K, this doesn't include R&D costs, whatever that was.

  • @J3LL05H0T
    @J3LL05H0T 18 днів тому +1105

    So basically economically friendly cruise missiles

    • @pileshmuzma9406
      @pileshmuzma9406 18 днів тому +33

      @@Editsdevil they're slow and have a payload of about 1/100th of a modern cruise missile.

    • @Cier433
      @Cier433 18 днів тому +55

      And if they use expensive missiles and other expensive equipment to shoot them down, they drain the enemy's resources.

    • @dismasalwanga4644
      @dismasalwanga4644 18 днів тому +37

      ​@@Cier433 😂😂😂 just say they will deplete gods chosen people resources

    • @pileshmuzma9406
      @pileshmuzma9406 18 днів тому +1

      ​@@dismasalwanga4644 what point are you trying to make?

    • @chillxxx241
      @chillxxx241 18 днів тому

      Not anywhere close. It does not have anywhere near the capability of a cruise missile. It is a poor nations drone. They would build bigger and better if they could, but they can’t.

  • @KafshakTashtak
    @KafshakTashtak 18 днів тому +580

    My guess is that 50000$ price tag is when you build it in the US. For Iran, it's probably cheaper.

    • @Ali-fx6jd
      @Ali-fx6jd 18 днів тому +32

      I have seen estimates as low as 17,000-20,000

    • @zain371
      @zain371 18 днів тому +15

      @@Ali-fx6jdheard in Iran it costs just a couple thousands

    • @Ali-fx6jd
      @Ali-fx6jd 18 днів тому +15

      @@zain371 it likely is that cheap. I believe you. I would say that its probably as cheap as 7000 per unit

    • @MASH1385
      @MASH1385 17 днів тому +5

      so irani soueces say 20k$ a piece for countrys that want this

    • @Friendly4twenty
      @Friendly4twenty 17 днів тому +5

      Export price, not cost of production

  • @cornebod
    @cornebod 17 днів тому +132

    It's cheap for one reason and one reason alone. It's not made by a military industrial complex that inflates the price 100 fold, heck the US military buys hammers for $800 a piece😂😂

    • @rohankishibe8259
      @rohankishibe8259 12 днів тому +7

      Bro the cost of replacing one toilet seat in a US military ship forgot her name, cost 41k!!! The seat, not the plumbing.....
      I think I've seen it in real engineering or not what you think, and these channels are affiliated with the military since they get exclusive tours and stuff.

  • @Sprinklebesties
    @Sprinklebesties 18 днів тому +353

    before you cannot sell to Iran now you cannot buy from iran .

    • @DeVibe.
      @DeVibe. 15 днів тому +7

      You shouldn't anyway.

    • @GalaxyTraveller1
      @GalaxyTraveller1 15 днів тому +17

      ​@@DeVibe. Why not

    • @GalaxyTraveller1
      @GalaxyTraveller1 15 днів тому

      ​@@DeVibe. I Rather give money to them than to the US because US has always stirred up violence in almost every country

    • @DeVibe.
      @DeVibe. 15 днів тому +8

      @@GalaxyTraveller1 because you shouldn't support terrorism.

    • @Xenomorph-hb4zf
      @Xenomorph-hb4zf 14 днів тому +21

      @@DeVibe. If Iran manages to get it down to 5000 USD each why not? A country would be able to buy hundreds of thousands of the drones.

  • @egonkirchof
    @egonkirchof 18 днів тому +328

    Life sucks so much that even drones are commiting suicide these days....

    • @user-yh1qd7lj5f
      @user-yh1qd7lj5f 17 днів тому +6

      its like calling missile a suicide rocket🤦‍♂

    • @sdaafasfad
      @sdaafasfad 17 днів тому +1

      ​@@user-yh1qd7lj5f the name Shahed is derived from the root š-h-d. In Islam, Shahed is commonly used to mean "martyr". It's similar to the Judaeo-Christian concept of martyr, and is a title of honor given to Muslims who died in the cause of Islam.

    • @user-yh1qd7lj5f
      @user-yh1qd7lj5f 17 днів тому +8

      @@sdaafasfad martyr is called shaheed😭 shahed is a muslim male name that means "witness" or "beloved", you can search shahed afridi or shahid kapoor

    • @sdaafasfad
      @sdaafasfad 17 днів тому +3

      @@user-yh1qd7lj5f bro I can't lie, I'm an idiot, I got 2+2 but got 16 for some reason, thanks for correcting me 😂😣

    • @user-yh1qd7lj5f
      @user-yh1qd7lj5f 16 днів тому

      @@sdaafasfad no way💀💀💀

  • @jeremiasrobinson
    @jeremiasrobinson 18 днів тому +422

    "The Expensive US Bombs Wreaking Havoc on the Innocent People of Gaza" - When will the WSJ be willing to write headlines more like that?

    • @RevolutionaryResistance
      @RevolutionaryResistance 18 днів тому

      Al-qassam and Al-quds brigades are not innocent, get off your censored social media and learn about the real world, kid

    • @themost3730
      @themost3730 18 днів тому +4

      thats not journalism how do you know if their innocent

    • @DistrustHumanz
      @DistrustHumanz 18 днів тому +86

      ​@themost3730 When I see a video of a child, I don't need someone else to inform me that child is innocent.

    • @mvflp2218
      @mvflp2218 18 днів тому

      Never, its a western media company. To do so, would be treason in the eyes of the nationalized masses.

    • @jasonborne5724
      @jasonborne5724 18 днів тому +16

      @@DistrustHumanzwhen there’s a group of dead terrorists next to the child, try blaming the terrorists for putting the child in danger.

  • @timtimtim8004
    @timtimtim8004 18 днів тому +387

    US will never have cost effective drones.. otherwise how will their military supply companies survive?.. higher the cost better profit

    • @CrimsonAlchemist
      @CrimsonAlchemist 18 днів тому +13

      Well said!

    • @trevorsutherland5263
      @trevorsutherland5263 18 днів тому +22

      100% true. Our MIC doesn't know how to build "simple" things, even when asked to. A "cheap" drone to Northrop-Grumman or Lockheed-Martin is $1M each...."

    • @cemdursun
      @cemdursun 18 днів тому +5

      The defense industry has been changing rapidly, it is privatizing to be exact. No more blank checks. Companies like Anduril are changing that "higher the cost better profit" scheme

    • @Netcentric-fk6ek
      @Netcentric-fk6ek 18 днів тому +2

      little weak cheap drones are just that little and weak. We don't build them because they are ineffective. We could ride horses into battle against tanks....but we don't because they are ineffective

    • @trevorsutherland5263
      @trevorsutherland5263 18 днів тому +30

      @@Netcentric-fk6ek wow, an entire 7 minute video clearly showing they *are* effective and you just ignored it. That is an impressive display of refusal to be objective! You must vote GOP....."

  • @saitokurihara9748
    @saitokurihara9748 13 днів тому +7

    Never underestimate Iran.

  • @Giggidyflanders
    @Giggidyflanders 18 днів тому +279

    Tell me you're scared of Iran without telling me you're scared of Iran 🇮🇷 😅

    • @hossein.m1912
      @hossein.m1912 15 днів тому +11

      Ask that from ismail haniyeh
      Ohh wait, he doesn't exist. 🤣

    • @simonschneider5913
      @simonschneider5913 15 днів тому +2

      theyre envious. same with russia.

    • @sueyourself5413
      @sueyourself5413 14 днів тому +22

      @@hossein.m1912 You mean that he was murdered.
      What would happen if the Brits murdered the leader of Sinn Fein during the good friday agreement negotation? Do you think that the IRA would have just laughed it off?

    • @RaynJames-d4l
      @RaynJames-d4l 13 днів тому +4

      yeah like the homeless guy on the street who might stab me for a beer scared

    • @simonschneider5913
      @simonschneider5913 13 днів тому +1

      @@hossein.m1912 you sure are proud. which never ends well...

  • @atalali1989
    @atalali1989 16 днів тому +89

    Why us weapons used against russia and palestine are not a problem but iranian drones are

    • @ultraali453
      @ultraali453 13 днів тому +3

      because russia and separatist movements around the world won't play by the rules agreed upon by united nations

    • @donHooligan
      @donHooligan 12 днів тому

      do you work at a movie theater,@@ultraali453?
      you're a great projectionist!

    • @Smokeyyy337
      @Smokeyyy337 12 днів тому

      @@ultraali453united nations all agree that Palestine has a right to survive and what israel is doing is human rights crime, yet nothing changes. Sadly playing by the rules only hinders your own progress. How many times have USA toppled government through CIA? In the end power and economy is all that matters, that's why Russia is attacking Ukraine, and Israel is colonizing Palestine, by the use of Power.

    • @ABOLFASR
      @ABOLFASR 11 днів тому +13

      ​@ultraali453 Niether does the U.S and Israel!

    • @susmitbhai
      @susmitbhai 11 днів тому +12

      ​@@ultraali453keep telling ur self that 😂

  • @bilalbazzi5002
    @bilalbazzi5002 12 днів тому +5

    No body can mess with Iran

  • @ayudroid3568
    @ayudroid3568 18 днів тому +128

    $50K is the price of the Iron Dome rockets that the US taxpayer provides to shoot down Shahed drones.
    I guess you got your numbers mixed up.

    • @MHKS-vizh
      @MHKS-vizh 15 днів тому +13

      Those cost more than that.

    • @fleisbester612
      @fleisbester612 12 днів тому +6

      Nah, the price of the Iron Dome rockets is way more than that, a single missile cost 1 million USD

    • @smallcube-zn2mm
      @smallcube-zn2mm 11 днів тому

      so Iran is slowly making US and Israel bankrupt LOL

    • @hellothere1656
      @hellothere1656 10 днів тому

      A stinger missile costs $150k and those things are designed for taking out low flying aircraft, not fast moving rockets.

    • @shahincoco4710
      @shahincoco4710 4 дні тому

      i think you smoking too mich mate ! just take a break

  • @NightDark-bw3xv
    @NightDark-bw3xv 18 днів тому +111

    Few years ago western scholar and general say that this drone is toy and nothing more than that.
    But Today the same people crying that this drone is dangerous and very effective
    Great respect for iran who stand strongly against colonial brutality occupation forces

    • @odisy64
      @odisy64 18 днів тому

      what are you talking about? the US has been using drones for decades, the MQ-9 reaper drone is one of the most famous in the world. do you just like making the west look backwards and ignorant because you are failing at that.

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 18 днів тому +8

      The combination of ignorance and arrogance is fatal.

    • @odisy64
      @odisy64 18 днів тому +2

      @@vlhc4642 thing is, they never said this, Americans have known of the effectiveness of drones for 2 decades thanks to the MQ-9

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 18 днів тому +9

      @@odisy64 Equating MQ-9 with modern drones is the ignorance part.

    • @AL-lh2ht
      @AL-lh2ht 18 днів тому +3

      The US have been using drones for literal decades. Misinfo goes brrrrrrrrr

  • @Futurelove-y6k
    @Futurelove-y6k 11 днів тому +7

    I don’t get it, why is this video so biased showing Iran as an enemy? When US is cruising around the middle east selling weapons and establishing its own military bases. Do you expect other countries would sit there and wait?

  • @Asadjaved501
    @Asadjaved501 11 днів тому +5

    Iran and its allies have a right to self defense….

  • @LearnWithBahman
    @LearnWithBahman 15 днів тому +117

    Iran has right to defend itself.

    • @rcchin7897
      @rcchin7897 14 днів тому +1

      So does that man Iran has the right to have its proxies attack Israel without provocation??

    • @unknownme7177
      @unknownme7177 14 днів тому +1

      ​@@rcchin7897 they provoked us

    • @diegoisawesomeable
      @diegoisawesomeable 14 днів тому

      @@rcchin7897all Israel does is provoke. Did your goldfish memory already forget the assasination of the diplomats in Syria?

    • @Gamahamel
      @Gamahamel 14 днів тому

    • @Gamahamel
      @Gamahamel 14 днів тому +18

      ​@@rcchin7897 the Palestinian have an international right to resist occupation.

  • @A-man3607-p7o
    @A-man3607-p7o 14 днів тому +15

    So US can provide weapons to whoever they want whenever they want but dare someone else does the same.

  • @UzumakiNagato
    @UzumakiNagato 14 днів тому +9

    These drones are becoming iconic I love it :D

  • @franciscoandreatta5803
    @franciscoandreatta5803 18 днів тому +223

    USD$50.000 is considered a cheap bullet? Man...the defense industry is so far from normal life. In Argentina you can buy a Toyota Hilux 4X4 2024 with that money

    • @idont3282
      @idont3282 18 днів тому +39

      A Tomahawk cruise missile is about 1.87 Million USD, so yeah, 50k is cheap

    • @thesilentpearl8575
      @thesilentpearl8575 18 днів тому +31

      Military is expensive. Honestly I feel like the shahed will remain. Also the costs are ~$20k I don’t know where the 50k cost figure came from. The cost of shooting it down costs ~$2m anyways and they have proven to be especially well as a decoy due to the fact that they can easily be shot down and is extremely cheap. In April, Iran blended in 9 hypersonic fatteh missiles within almost 200 of those in their attack against Israel and Israel was so busy shooting down the drones that all hypersonic missiles hit their targets. Plus the attack costed Iran about $50m (estimated) and Israel announced that the defense alone costed over $1b, let alone the damage.

    • @thesilentpearl8575
      @thesilentpearl8575 18 днів тому +7

      @@idont3282not to mention that estimates put the cost of the drone at $10-20k I don’t know where the 50k figure came from

    • @ServentOfAllah19
      @ServentOfAllah19 18 днів тому +6

      This Drone worth is 5k to 10k approximately not 50k dollar and Also in Iranian it's very cheaper

    • @MrTVintro
      @MrTVintro 18 днів тому +2

      Imagine that on a "good" day the US is "only" lobbing Lambo's, and not Bugatti's.

  • @dengist8172
    @dengist8172 17 днів тому +53

    Iran has been underestimated. Arguably it has a comparable if not better industry than Russia

    • @EternalKhann
      @EternalKhann 16 днів тому

      Don't think so. It's just the way that they are basically forced to be creative with the little wiggle space they have for expenses since they are sanctioned by the west for almost half a century by now. They simply specialized in min-maxing their capabilities of paramilitary warfare. They don't even have enough technologic know-how for maintaining helicopters that carry their presidents for crying out loud. It's just enough to blackmail their way out of the status quo.

    • @alispeed5095
      @alispeed5095 16 днів тому +13

      That doesnt make sense. Logically speaking. Russia has entire districts some as big as a small country being dedicate to factories producing military articles.
      I saw one they are launching soon for tanks. The place is humongous😂
      There military industrial base is simply absurd. If the west cant keep up. How can iran?
      Where iran is Op in my opinion is with potential and asymmetrical industry. Imagine if they didnt have all the sanctions? Where would they be? There potential imo surpasses anyone.
      You just cant help but respect a person that works with so little and yet achieves much.

    • @generalrommel5666
      @generalrommel5666 16 днів тому +4

      Let’s not go too far

    • @saadabbas7282
      @saadabbas7282 14 днів тому

      they make a lot in house

    • @pragmaticno1630
      @pragmaticno1630 13 днів тому

      🤣🤣🤣

  • @abdullahqamar600
    @abdullahqamar600 15 днів тому +17

    They added ukrain alongside israel to make iran look bad. 😂😂

    • @gravity00x
      @gravity00x 11 днів тому +1

      it was halfway through the video where I wondered how they are going to incorporate their pro. p4.ganda and I wasn't disappointed almost instantly haha!

  • @manformnowhere
    @manformnowhere 17 днів тому +42

    Now, us propaganda is like a comedy show 😂😂

    • @RaynJames-d4l
      @RaynJames-d4l 13 днів тому +1

      because our enemies are comical lol

    • @Jacobtrees
      @Jacobtrees 10 днів тому

      ​@@RaynJames-d4lIran is not your enemy they are simply a threat to the people who attacked uss liberty

  • @kaunas888
    @kaunas888 12 днів тому +6

    We hear a lot about how the US military is so much more powerful than other militaries because the US spends so much money. But, a lot of that money is wasted on overly complicated, delicate and extremely expensive weapons. Many other countries are able to stretch their military budgets to go a lot farther and thus be more effective per dollar spent. Just throwing endless money at bureaucracies does not always produce better results.

    • @erroneous6947
      @erroneous6947 11 днів тому

      As an American I assure you at least half that money ends up going to generals who will later get a job at those same contractors as advisors. Total racket. Almost as dumb as letting politicians trade stock on their insider information.

  • @eventHorizonROstock
    @eventHorizonROstock 13 днів тому +4

    "Iran relies on its proxies for its own security and its own regional interests"
    says the US american :DDD

  • @silverianjannvs5315
    @silverianjannvs5315 15 днів тому +23

    Persians are smart and intelligent, under intense sanctions but still manage to produce own drones & other advanced military hardwares.

    • @thepianist7084
      @thepianist7084 12 днів тому

      Can you imagine what the Persians could do if under a regime of freedom? It would be one of the superpowers of the world I think.

    • @Techtalk2030
      @Techtalk2030 11 днів тому

      @@thepianist7084Iran needs better governance but so do most countries

  • @darkknight17
    @darkknight17 14 днів тому +17

    Peace is cheaper than war.

    • @Jacobtrees
      @Jacobtrees 10 днів тому

      Tell that to murica who invaded/boomed 41 countries since ww2

    • @darkknight17
      @darkknight17 10 днів тому

      @@Jacobtrees that's American capitalism.

  • @husseinnaji3732
    @husseinnaji3732 18 днів тому +219

    $50,000 cost ? You mean $5,000

    • @EternalKhann
      @EternalKhann 16 днів тому +3

      No. Still too many parts that need to be imported including mid to high tech sensors and GPS/GLONASS orientation.

    • @ZgO_o
      @ZgO_o 15 днів тому +2

      Naah bruh, its 10k at most, even Iranian sources claim no higher than 13 or 15k

    • @HairLessBush
      @HairLessBush 15 днів тому +5

      ​​@@EternalKhann lol a nokia phone that cost about 100$ can do all of that. They also literally buy in bulk so its even cheaper.

    • @4X10S
      @4X10S 13 днів тому

      @@EternalKhann Guess who owns GLONAS and who doesn't give a sh8t about U.S. sanctions.
      I'm pretty sure Russia can supply them with LITERALLY any material in the world, I'm not even talking about China which still actively trading with Iran.

    • @RaynJames-d4l
      @RaynJames-d4l 13 днів тому

      made in China lol

  • @BopperNoStopper
    @BopperNoStopper 17 днів тому +15

    "SOMETIMES IT WORKS" WOW GREAT EXPERT OPINION

    • @richxrocker4434
      @richxrocker4434 14 днів тому +5

      No need to be smart to be a CSIS paid mouthpiece, one just need to be able to open their mouth and spewing non sense stuff while trying to keep sound and look smart.

  • @kiadav9529
    @kiadav9529 14 днів тому +5

    last time i check, you guys are laughing at this drone and made fun of it, what happen? kekeke

  • @afa6361
    @afa6361 18 днів тому +51

    Remember that Shahed drones also evolve.

    • @REvoSISTANCE
      @REvoSISTANCE 17 днів тому +2

      Shahed 136 drones are the clear example showing IRGC asymmetric doctrine, "that the enemy should play in the ground I choose".

    • @REvoSISTANCE
      @REvoSISTANCE 17 днів тому +1

      On the technical level, everything was going in the direction of "faster", even radars have trouble detecting "slower" object! Iran has many such weapon systems designed for asymmetric response which is in fact the same "Flexible Response" in deterrence doctrine. Let us impose painful "patience" on the enemy who is used to shock and awe and desire to win quickly!

  • @muhammadhassankiyani8953
    @muhammadhassankiyani8953 16 днів тому +19

    The dude forgot to mention that if you're going to build anti-drone technologies then the opposing side is also going to make their drones better and faster. If these drones are not invulnerable, as the dude had to say it multiple times, then why did Ukraine blow up its manufacturing facility in Russia? No matter how much you try to deny it, the Persians have outsmarted your entire NATO arsenal and industrial complex despite sanctions. The fact is that they are lethal and taking a huge toll on NATO equipment provided to Ukraine. USA/NATO had all the knowledge about Russian weaponry before the war and had built every type of weapon to counter them, but since the entry of this equipment, every other Western news channel is talking about them. This so much publicity itself tells us that they are very difficult to intercept and deadly.

    • @thedeadwalkingguy
      @thedeadwalkingguy 14 днів тому +1

      China.....sits quietly in a corner and smiles..

    • @amineboum9493
      @amineboum9493 8 днів тому

      ​@thedeadwalkingguy it's like if that's what iran did to you , just wait to see what I am veiling 😅.

  • @WalkOverHotCoal
    @WalkOverHotCoal 14 днів тому +8

    Now when I hear a lawnmower on weekends, I stay in my bunker.

  • @IronWarrior86
    @IronWarrior86 18 днів тому +21

    I said right away that Iran's suicide drones would be a game changer and bound to have a huge impact at the unveiling a couple of years ago during one of their military exercises when they presented their latest weapon. Who knew they would make their debut in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, could never been foreseen.

  • @BootsOfLeather
    @BootsOfLeather 18 днів тому +95

    WE spend 30 million on a single drone. I want my money funding schools and building roads. F.

    • @RevolutionaryResistance
      @RevolutionaryResistance 18 днів тому

      weapons industry is the backbone of the american economy, you would be homeless without it

    • @robertmusil1107
      @robertmusil1107 18 днів тому

      You spend so much on a drone while not even having an official war and can't fix the street thousands of people use daily. Isn't it funny how money is distributed? So much arsenal just to "impress" the bad guys that never even dared to attack you in the first place

    • @amirafshar2580
      @amirafshar2580 18 днів тому +18

      And 7 of those drones have already shoot down by Yemeni houthis

    • @AL-lh2ht
      @AL-lh2ht 18 днів тому +3

      @@amirafshar2580 source: I made it up

    • @AL-lh2ht
      @AL-lh2ht 18 днів тому +2

      Your money does go to school and building roads. It might be hard for you to understand but without military spending international trade stops. and then you'll be complaining about not being able to buy basic goods.

  • @SheltonVy
    @SheltonVy 17 днів тому +186

    From $10K to $110K, that's the minimum range of profit return every week. I think it's not a bad one for me, now l have enough to pay bills and take
    care of my family.

    • @Harveygorge
      @Harveygorge 17 днів тому

      Excuse me for real?, how is that ? I have been struggling financially. How was that possible?

    • @SheltonVy
      @SheltonVy 17 днів тому

      Oh, yeah. I was able to achieve that with the help of my coach /Mrs Sandra Maria Ferraguti❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    • @SheltonVy
      @SheltonVy 17 днів тому

      She's a licensed broker and successful
      entrepreneur from the state.

    • @SheltonVy
      @SheltonVy 17 днів тому

      Her top-notch guidance and expertise on
      digital market changed the game for me.

    • @nekiroystyan2692
      @nekiroystyan2692 17 днів тому

      That's great!!. I don't know anything about
      investing, and I intend to start. What are
      your strategies?

  • @samfromuk796
    @samfromuk796 15 днів тому +35

    WSJ - owned by Israel

    • @BokBokBok1
      @BokBokBok1 15 днів тому +3

      And youtube

    • @tymax6751
      @tymax6751 12 днів тому

      All these biased media companies are owned by the Zionists. The world is trying to break out of the Matrix.

    • @abhimanyunath2001
      @abhimanyunath2001 12 днів тому

      Seems more like they are supporting islamist 😅

    • @smallcube-zn2mm
      @smallcube-zn2mm 11 днів тому

      @@BokBokBok1 UA-cam is publicly traded, you can also be an owner

    • @derekhartenstine8545
      @derekhartenstine8545 11 днів тому +1

      Public. However, 2nd and 3rd largest shareholders are Vanguard and BlackRock. Maybe not owned by Israel, but we know where the loyalty lies.
      That's UA-cam.
      Major shareholder of WSJ is Dow Jones Company. Largest 3 for Dow Jones, Vanguard, BlackRock and State Street.

  • @vpsn99
    @vpsn99 18 днів тому +59

    Figure of USD 50k mentioned seems highly inflated. In many other videos/articles, the cost is mentioned between 5-10k only.

    • @keking2178
      @keking2178 17 днів тому +5

      Adding American sanctions and duties 😂

    • @abhimanyunath2001
      @abhimanyunath2001 12 днів тому

      It's impossible..
      Iran may claim it 5USD.. 😂

    • @Belloking1
      @Belloking1 12 днів тому

      WSJ works with the pentagon. They have an interest in misinforming the public and other nations considering purchasing them

  • @Mohammed-gw2nn
    @Mohammed-gw2nn 18 днів тому +77

    30 million what a joke ! Bet ya any money in the world most of the senators has a stake in it

    • @Also_sprach_Zarathustra.
      @Also_sprach_Zarathustra. 17 днів тому +4

      corruption will destroy us, as always ...

    • @iverbrnstad791
      @iverbrnstad791 15 днів тому +1

      I mean, American military is completely sloshed with money, there's several trillions of assets they can't account for. Like, imagine Apple and Microsoft getting lost between the couch pillows...

  • @lakunna991
    @lakunna991 15 днів тому +7

    Care to shed some light on the havoc wreaked by expensive US bombs?!!??

  • @chaosland5325
    @chaosland5325 15 днів тому +8

    It always poses a threat to the US when other countries possess such simple and cheap weapons. And it doesn't pose a threat to other nations if the US has sophisticated weapons .😂

  • @bozackdakilla7846
    @bozackdakilla7846 18 днів тому +15

    Comparing this to a reaper doesn’t make sense… it is essentially a slow cheap cruise missile.

    • @hellothere1656
      @hellothere1656 10 днів тому

      For the price of one $2 million tomahawk cruise missile, u can get 60 of these drones.

  • @bierhoff15
    @bierhoff15 18 днів тому +31

    That's not a reaper drone, it's a predator.

    • @GenFalcon
      @GenFalcon 17 днів тому

      And preds maxed at 16mil.

    • @aaroncruz9181
      @aaroncruz9181 17 днів тому

      Unmanned Terrorism

    • @RaynJames-d4l
      @RaynJames-d4l 13 днів тому

      cheap copy not even close... sold from Iran but Made in China

    • @Utubeisevil
      @Utubeisevil 12 днів тому

      well they have shaan shaikh the analyst

  • @TwoRials
    @TwoRials 16 днів тому +3

    The creation of this video and the inclusion of an expert to simplify the drone's capabilities indicate a stroke of engineering brilliance. It's effective, affordable, simple to mass-produce, and scalable, reminiscent of Japanese automotive engineering from several decades ago.

  • @stizanley3987
    @stizanley3987 18 днів тому +120

    Isn't a one-time kamikaze drone a cruise missile? Is it a drone because it doesn't have a jet engine?

    • @DIREWOLFx75
      @DIREWOLFx75 18 днів тому +30

      Nah, it's because it's not a missile. There's plenty of drones with jet engines as well.
      But the overlap is becoming noticeable.

    • @Genebriss
      @Genebriss 18 днів тому +14

      It seems like this is just marketing terminology and there's no substantial difference

    • @TinyBlitz8
      @TinyBlitz8 18 днів тому +10

      It’s a drone because it is controlled using a remote, not like missiles that are already guided to their target once it is launched.

    • @trevorsutherland5263
      @trevorsutherland5263 18 днів тому +3

      Well technically, a "cruise missile" has historically been able to be programmed for "waypoints"; i.e. it is capable of changing its flight path either via program or with some level of autonomy. So far, a "drone" cannot do that; it uses satnav to just fly the shortest path to its destination. However, the moment they get that capability, their cost goes up, but at that point it probably becomes a "cruise missile"...."

    • @TinyBlitz8
      @TinyBlitz8 18 днів тому +3

      It’s a drone because it is controlled using a remote, not like missiles that are already guided to their target once it is launched. Missiles are made with high tech complicated parts while drones can just be made with any semiconductor found in washing machines and other appliances.

  • @groanz5710
    @groanz5710 18 днів тому +11

    I expect more from the wall street journal, this is insane.
    First of all the price of the SHAHED-136, a leak has revealed the price to be 20-50k. Using the highest estimate without explaining the range is misleading.
    Moreover you are comparing it to the U.S. Reaper Drone? You are comparing two totally different machines. One is a drone missile, the other is a drone aircraft. Two totally different things? The way they're flying, the speed, the costs, the purpose, the way its flown EVERYTHING.
    And btw, if you are stating 'U.S. Reaper Drone', I supose you mean the 'Reaper' which is the only thing holding that name? As in MQ9 Reaper. Why would you show a picture of the MQ1 Predator then? You have not done your full research... come on guys....

    • @rilesbronson7990
      @rilesbronson7990 16 днів тому +1

      None of those facts matter. All that matters is that the voice over is done with a British accent.

    • @herticate8579
      @herticate8579 15 днів тому +2

      Low effort production with no backing in military expertise or technology. Such a disgrace for any journalistic media!

    • @hadikhan63
      @hadikhan63 13 днів тому +2

      Propaganda clip to shadow the genocide

  • @navado75
    @navado75 15 днів тому +5

    Low tech vs high tech. All the hype and over blown budgets only to enrich the top 1%.

  • @samuelsirota2816
    @samuelsirota2816 15 днів тому +2

    Iran has the absolute right to defend itself, interest and its allies in the region. Supporting Russia in its war efforts is nothing more than just support for an allies right to their interests.
    same for the USA supporting genocide in gaza

  • @Aetius-ju1tc
    @Aetius-ju1tc 18 днів тому +47

    Some things I think to explain.
    - Shahed is not the name of the family of kamikaze drones. Shahed is the named of a Company. What they make has Shahed in its name, including other drones but also other aviation like helicopter.
    -The reason the sound is for a reason. The sound works to cause panic on the defender similar to German planes in WW2.
    - Iran has the ability to produce advances products like cheaper drones similar to the ones of the US but for example also advanced missiles, tanks or anti air systems.
    -The way Russia uses the drones are not how Iran intended to use it. Iran use it as cheap missiles sometimes, but it is more uses used as a part of a bigger attack. The sound and amount of these drones are supposed to panic the defender, in which heavier Iranian drones, artillery and missile systems will attack the weekend enemy. In war there would probably also be an attack. The drone can also be used in skirmishes like most Iranian equipment.
    -The reason anti drone system are not effective against these system are many. First the drone is meant to cause distraction and explosion, both. If the defence is focused on the drone, a better equipment will be uses simultaneously.
    They are also uses to waste expensive units. When a expensive missile hits it, Iran does not lose as much as the defender. In reality the missile has not destroyed the drone, the drone destroyed the missile.

    • @RevolutionaryResistance
      @RevolutionaryResistance 18 днів тому +1

      Ukrainians call them "mopeds" and shot them down with small arms from the ground and from helicopters without much issue.

    • @cemdursun
      @cemdursun 18 днів тому +9

      Iranian trolls in action. They are not noisy because they cause panic. They get shot down when they are heard. Causing panic is not the goal of an attack drone, it is to attack and destroy.
      They are noisy because they use piston powered propellers with little to no insulation.
      Iran DOES NOT have the ability to produce a drone similar to Reaper's capability. If they did, we would be seeing them.
      Iran military has a budget of over 20 percent of its GDP. If they could build a highly capable drone, they would do it. But they just can't.
      Try harder.

    • @Andandand25
      @Andandand25 18 днів тому

      How do you know all of that?

    • @bluemystic5980
      @bluemystic5980 18 днів тому +1

      poootin bot spotted

    • @John_Doe448
      @John_Doe448 18 днів тому +8

      ​@@bluemystic5980 grow up and learn spelling. It's not even about Russia, nor is his response.

  • @ahan300
    @ahan300 18 днів тому +34

    Iran would be so fool or act too generous by helping Russia transfering drone tech if not demanding nuclear tech & weapon from them in return.

    • @mightybagrutlord
      @mightybagrutlord 18 днів тому

      a vulnerable & desperate Putin might comply.
      Especially since he's falling out with China.

    • @techarch8851
      @techarch8851 18 днів тому +10

      I think they do have some kind of deal. They wouldn't just openly announce it. Russia has already delivered air defenses to Iran and have promised them su35s. Plus Russia has openly announced they will help Iran militarily if they were attacked.
      The Iranian nuclear power plant was facilitated by Russia.
      As far as we know Russia might have sent their scientists to Iran to help them expedite their nuclear weapon.

    • @dropshipincanada
      @dropshipincanada 18 днів тому +3

      drone tech? they literally say its super easy produce and nothing unique about these drones lol

    • @korencek
      @korencek 18 днів тому +3

      @@techarch8851 true. Russia wants to give Iran their planes, but they need something in exchange. Nothing that Russia couldn't develop themselves, but it's allowing Russia to give Iran their high tech equipment.

    • @jackuzi8252
      @jackuzi8252 18 днів тому

      Well, they can give them the upgraded drones, with jet engines and active seeking.

  • @tanksaawk
    @tanksaawk 16 днів тому +3

    I always love the excuse of "poses a threat to the US and it's partners"
    If you're not at war with them, it's not a threat
    And btw, a US aircraft carrier + subs in the region is not a threat to them? Oh I forgot, we are the world police xD

  • @eliteneckbeard8035
    @eliteneckbeard8035 18 днів тому +76

    Russia has Kamikaze shovels thats werid

    • @Archemideez
      @Archemideez 18 днів тому +9

      russia makes drones from washing machines😂

    • @korencek
      @korencek 18 днів тому +1

      And ukraine is shooting down planes with pickle jars.

    • @kariminalo979
      @kariminalo979 18 днів тому

      found the glowiebot

    • @aaroncruz9181
      @aaroncruz9181 17 днів тому

      At this point they're just Market Gardeners

    • @donHooligan
      @donHooligan 12 днів тому

      the west can't touch a hypersonic shovel.

  • @FriendofMineralTown
    @FriendofMineralTown 18 днів тому +23

    I’m sure it was inevitable that they figured out how to make these but I can’t help but think of the times in the last 20 years where America lost drones in Iran or nearby and they captured it. We shrugged it off, because we can’t look like we’re in a panic over it, but Iran put them on display and shared photos of them with the world. They didn’t need to figure out how to copy us to the key, they just needed to figure out how to make something that can fly.

    • @TheCpHaddock
      @TheCpHaddock 18 днів тому +10

      Except they've been doing that since the 80s way before any US drone was captured by them.

    • @AL-lh2ht
      @AL-lh2ht 18 днів тому +3

      americans drones and rhese drones are extremely different. Iran drones you could build in your garage if you wanted to.

    • @m_bat-f9l
      @m_bat-f9l 17 днів тому

      I guess you re talking about RQ-170

    • @hichic4390
      @hichic4390 17 днів тому

      In fact, America did not lose its drones, but they were hacked and landed by taking control. About copying, you have only heard something and you don't know that this is a common process in all countries.
      Have you ever thought about how America got the missile technology?

    • @richxrocker4434
      @richxrocker4434 14 днів тому

      The correct term is Reverse Engineering and not copying.

  • @tonym1927
    @tonym1927 18 днів тому +15

    So it takes a multimillion dollar missile to shoot down a 50k Shahed drone. Once they overwhelm the defense system then they can rain down their real missiles. Huh. We have more to gain to be friends with these people than continue pissing them off. With all due respect to the military industrial complex, Why don’t we leave their neighborhood and attend to ours?

    • @SheksgemWhepdo
      @SheksgemWhepdo 18 днів тому

      Wars are way too expensive. What do you expect?

    • @robertmusil1107
      @robertmusil1107 18 днів тому

      US needs to distract from its own population drowning in inflation. If there were no distractions people would actually ask questions. A war is always a way to get a "common enemy" so no one questions the own politicians incompetence

    • @whateveausaid
      @whateveausaid 18 днів тому

      💰

    • @gugulethuzangwa8358
      @gugulethuzangwa8358 18 днів тому

      It's not even 50k more like 20k

  • @wiiliskaako5875
    @wiiliskaako5875 18 днів тому +7

    Well don't compare kamikaze with US reaper drones . Iran have their own called ababil 5 which can do reconnaissance and attack

  • @Technotrad3r
    @Technotrad3r 17 днів тому +12

    I just wanted to bring to your attention that the Shahed drone cost $15k-$20k to manufacture and that they have been selling them to Russia for $170k per unit. That $50k price tag is wrong.

  • @Benjamin_Bratten
    @Benjamin_Bratten 18 днів тому +14

    If you think that's bad you should see the expensive AMERICAN kamikaze cruise missiles wreaking havoc in Gaza.

  • @Sunopeek
    @Sunopeek 17 днів тому +2

    I get the message, but isn't this insanely hypocritical?
    Just how much death, destruction, and chaos were created by Western weapons and wars by comparison?

  • @xaviert7839
    @xaviert7839 14 днів тому +4

    Stressed out the Air defense system by lawn mower is a pretty funny thing to consider.

  • @Neo-v7e
    @Neo-v7e 16 днів тому +3

    For me when it comes to drones mostly projectiles, I think Iran 🇮🇷 is the world super power 😢 these guys really surpass the west with that drone dominance and the west are really surprised about this , Iran 🇮🇷 drone brought change and balance to the war industry no cap 😢

  • @ZAMislive
    @ZAMislive 14 днів тому +5

    iran has the right to defend itself

  • @camryhsalem5139
    @camryhsalem5139 14 днів тому +3

    stopping wars costs nothing.

  • @toma.3d
    @toma.3d 18 днів тому +8

    At 2:45 " the US Reaper drone..." while showing a picture of the Predator drone !!!!
    Do your research....

    • @Utubeisevil
      @Utubeisevil 12 днів тому

      thats shaan shaikh the analyst lol

  • @jesusonXTC
    @jesusonXTC 18 днів тому +6

    Shahed 136 is just the tip of the ice berg for iranian drones. Much much better drones Iran has such as shahed 149, mohajer 10, fortros, ababil 3, moahjer 6, shahed 191, karrar, kaman, arash 2, omid etc. Shahed 136 is just a deterior to overwhelm air defence systems.

  • @kaunas888
    @kaunas888 12 днів тому +3

    In the US military everything is made as complex as possible to justify endless profits for the MIC and their bribes to generals and politicians. So what we get from such a system are weapons which are very complex and very very expensive to buy and operate. Then, along comes a place like Iran whose goal is the opposite: to get the most bang for the buck. In other words to build something cheap and effective. This upsets the existing paradigm of a relentlessly march towards endlessly more complex and expensive systems. Why use a 1 million $ anti-ballistic missile to take out a drone that costs $15,000?

  • @PrayingPanda
    @PrayingPanda 12 днів тому +2

    What's the issue? US interfered with and has crippled Iran. Why shouldn't they develop their own arms and sell them? The US seems to have no issue selling arms to irans enemies, and using their own arms against Iran within their borders.

  • @kamalsidhu7454
    @kamalsidhu7454 18 днів тому +5

    Forgot to mention, when it got shot down down and fell on ground, it explodes as usual

    • @abhimanyunath2001
      @abhimanyunath2001 12 днів тому

      NOPE... IT explodes in the air.. Or its impact fuse doesn't aligned to detonate

  • @jagannathan1481
    @jagannathan1481 18 днів тому +30

    Need peace..dont push to war

    • @miki_9034
      @miki_9034 18 днів тому +4

      How would they make money?

    • @okman9684
      @okman9684 18 днів тому +2

      Will you pay for job loss in weapons factory?

    • @DistrustHumanz
      @DistrustHumanz 18 днів тому

      ​@okman9684 The movie Idiocracy proven once again.

  • @hylimm
    @hylimm 18 днів тому +4

    But the US has almost 1 trillion military budget! 😂

  • @esashaik1372
    @esashaik1372 13 днів тому +2

    This is one of Irans weakest drones.WSJ should be specific when addressing Iran's capabilities.Iran can build drones more advance than America's reaper

  • @user-nf3zv6sp7k
    @user-nf3zv6sp7k 14 днів тому +4

    Slava Iran 🇮🇷

  • @AprilTitus
    @AprilTitus 10 днів тому

    The moment one gives close attention to anything, even a blade of grass, it becomes a mysterious, awesome, indescribably magnificent world in itself.

  • @MaxR52
    @MaxR52 18 днів тому +12

    Shaan's face looks like an upside down light bulb. It's so round on the bottom and square on top lol

    • @j4genius961
      @j4genius961 18 днів тому

      I was thinking he looks so weird lol😂

    • @AdamBechtol
      @AdamBechtol 18 днів тому

      He's a cutie.

    • @ThePanzerFreak5
      @ThePanzerFreak5 17 днів тому +1

      He looks like a middle eastern Sergio Ramos

  • @dniprokids531
    @dniprokids531 18 днів тому +19

    So you guys are literally advertising Iranian Drones to potential buyers 😮

    • @acash93
      @acash93 17 днів тому +2

      Eddie Murphy Thinking meme

    • @bryceanderson4864
      @bryceanderson4864 17 днів тому +6

      As if it were a still a secret to those interested in purchasing one....

  • @storyinsport9110
    @storyinsport9110 18 днів тому +4

    Seriously they are not suicidal drones. Stop calling them that.

  • @bradisbell
    @bradisbell 18 днів тому +4

    Single-source story, 'eh? I thought the Wall Street Journal was supposed to be better than that.

  • @randoir1863
    @randoir1863 18 днів тому +33

    What or who are your sources for the cost to make these drones? I've seen other videos that estimate the cost at as low as 20k USD .

    • @trevorsutherland5263
      @trevorsutherland5263 18 днів тому +3

      Once RU started building them under license; *their* cost per unit went way, way down.

    • @memesfarsi3111
      @memesfarsi3111 18 днів тому +6

      Highest price for shahed drone was 25k
      I was wondering how they got that 50k

    • @deltaboy2011
      @deltaboy2011 18 днів тому

      Most likely 2k. It’s very cheap!

    • @klymnychyk8977
      @klymnychyk8977 18 днів тому

      @@trevorsutherland5263 HOI4 Dog

    • @abhimanyunath2001
      @abhimanyunath2001 12 днів тому

      I am hearing it 20K-50k all along..
      And they sold Russia it 193K

  • @NoorAlam-jw2zj
    @NoorAlam-jw2zj 18 днів тому +2

    its easy to say build capacity to knock these drones down but the reality is its far easier to build capacity to manufacture these drones then it is to manufacture the air defense systems that have high probability of destroying these drones.

  • @sihr07
    @sihr07 18 днів тому +22

    Opposite to the US missiles used to carry out a Genocide in Palestine

    • @zyt4zcn
      @zyt4zcn 18 днів тому

      you meant to defend against genocide in Israel

    • @anizobaobinna9238
      @anizobaobinna9238 18 днів тому

      ⁠@@zyt4zcndefend against genocide??😂😂😂

  • @yerrobaldeh1703
    @yerrobaldeh1703 18 днів тому +2

    The way the west underated these drones before 😂😂😂😊😊

  • @Steve-nz6ek
    @Steve-nz6ek 18 днів тому +24

    Stupid even comparing Shahed to high value Reaper drones (using a predator drone as the image)

  • @joedoe2407
    @joedoe2407 14 днів тому

    Those are very effective drones. Defense against those is hardly doing the job. Even when shot down, they explode and sometimes in the middle of town, which is probably worse than letting it hit its original destination. In general, drones are a very scary weapon. I can't imagine what a swarm of armed drones driven by AI and visual recognition can do to a target and how safe anyone would feel when something like this exists.

  • @pythonantole9892
    @pythonantole9892 18 днів тому +11

    How do you justify spending $30 million on a single drone? Politician: "It's easy, just tell them when we drop a drone thousands of kilometres away, it keeps them safe back home". Really? Politician: "Yes, we have been telling them that for years and they have believed it". But we are killing our own in these wars. Politician: "Don't call it "war", refer to is a tour, that's how you get them to participate".

  • @ockertwessels649
    @ockertwessels649 14 днів тому +1

    It is wonderful when your opponents underrate you as a result of their own propaganda.

  • @afshinbiria3024
    @afshinbiria3024 16 днів тому +2

    How do you explain fear without using the word fear!!

  • @flowerforsyte5671
    @flowerforsyte5671 11 днів тому +1

    This guy did not tell us anything that we either did not know or was readily accessible from any basic news channel.

  • @AlanAhmad-n2d
    @AlanAhmad-n2d 18 днів тому +2

    Belive me, That dron does not cost the goverment $2000. This is truth

  • @justinereisler5930
    @justinereisler5930 13 днів тому +2

    1st they say iranian weapons suck and useless , now they say there wreaking havoc . hahahahaha iranian drones are really good and will only get better.

  • @Shining237
    @Shining237 18 днів тому +5

    "Western countries are like small children playing with matches" .... Mr Sergei Lavrov

  • @-mg-max-
    @-mg-max- 17 днів тому +1

    Essentially it means Iran thinks outside of the box!

  • @marc8750
    @marc8750 18 днів тому +8

    Fascinating! Technology of our time is both mind boggling and frightening

  • @newbeginning1510
    @newbeginning1510 15 днів тому

    Good for Iran. Defending itself despite illegal extremist sanctions

  • @JohnSmith-on2ud
    @JohnSmith-on2ud 12 днів тому +2

    😂😅😂😅😅😂 I thought Iran 🇮🇷 was a poor country? Long live Iran 🇮🇷

  • @hermaeusmora2945
    @hermaeusmora2945 16 днів тому +2

    Of course the U.S. Reaper drone costs $30 million. How else are weapons companies, generals and politicians that own stocks in those companies, going to get rich bilking the American taxpayer?

  • @Chukichev.Scientificmyths
    @Chukichev.Scientificmyths 17 днів тому +12

    Why can Iranian drones in Russian hands fly all over Ukraine, but American missiles in Ukrainian hands can't fly all over Russia???

    • @goodintentions5189
      @goodintentions5189 16 днів тому

      Russia is manufacturing them in Russia, they bought the tech. If Ukraine can buy the tech and manufacture them in Ukraine then no problem. Otherwise Russia would have no problem giving Houthis and Hezbollah Islander missile tech if US missiles are used directly in US

    • @redstartline
      @redstartline 15 днів тому +6

      Because western weapon meant for Ukrainian defence not for offensive/invasion on russia land. If they do so then all military strategic location in all over europe will be target for the russian and will escalate towards WW3. Thats why battle of Kursk called incursion. Putin also wants to avoid escalation.

    • @Chukichev.Scientificmyths
      @Chukichev.Scientificmyths 14 днів тому

      @@redstartline Russia thinks it is at war with NATO. And NATO doesn't know about it.

  • @ronulo
    @ronulo 17 днів тому +1

    Raytheon would charge half a million for each of these

    • @ginger_toggaf
      @ginger_toggaf 14 днів тому

      Shareholders in congress won't be happy if their stocks don't triple over night.