Which One Is Better? DJI vs AUTEL Photo Color Quality Comparison - RGGB or RYYB? Part 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 88

  • @Anthony-rc6yo
    @Anthony-rc6yo 3 роки тому +2

    Great comparison! Wish we have the DJI Mini 3 to compare the Nano drones with!

  • @ozstrayapanoramas8610
    @ozstrayapanoramas8610 3 роки тому +1

    Autel stated they working to address issue with Nano+ raw files in future update.
    Adobe editing software cannot handle ryyb images at the moment.

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому

      No wonder that they disable the shooting in RAW for now

    • @mharro88
      @mharro88 3 роки тому

      Where have they stated this?

  • @no15minutecities
    @no15minutecities 2 роки тому +2

    Why no 48mp file????

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  2 роки тому

      Back then they haven’t unlock this feature, now it is available

  • @07kevlar
    @07kevlar 3 роки тому +1

    hey GE, according to Autel's spec for the lite+ , it indeed has the RYYB sensor and not the RGGB sensor. You can check it yourself

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому

      Hi Kevin 👋The Lite has RYYB, the LiTe+ is just ordinary RGGB. The lite hasn’t been released yet due to firmware issue i believe. It was kinda confusing and i was tricked into thinking my Lite+ is RYYB too when doing my pre-order :(
      In essence, The Lite should perform much better in low light than the 1inch on the Lite+.

  • @GolferChris68
    @GolferChris68 3 роки тому +2

    Looking at the histograms, some of those Autel images are really overexposed. Was the exposure set manually, or automatic?

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому

      The settings were kept in automatic. The lite+ images does seems overexposed

    • @izoyt
      @izoyt 3 роки тому +2

      @@TheGreatExplorer all autel shots were clipped/overexposed.

  • @jc-world9328
    @jc-world9328 3 роки тому +1

    I’m deciding between the autel nano or the DJI mini 2, what do you suggest, thank you.

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому +1

      If u want to have the extra features not found on the Dji mini 2, like automated timelapse, no geofence and the ability to handle a lil better in low light, the Nano might be worth considering. The mini 2 is still a great drone, just that it’s been around for too long and not kinda worth it to buy new in 2022.

  • @InteractiveDNA
    @InteractiveDNA 3 роки тому +2

    Cool! Notice that the main reason why you film the white balance card if to get the colors right no matter what drone you use. In one click the colors will be corrected. I always recommend the gray card instead of white. Always film gray card and correct in post the white balance before any color-grading. White Balance right is one the most important part of filming. Many people don’t understand how it works and when to use it. Always use the gray card on 100% of any footage to avoid getting wrong colors in post. Anyway!!! great little drones!

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому +1

      Hey Ney. Great tips you’ve got there. I’ll try to implement when I’m doing videos next time.
      By the way, how do i possibly do a white balance calibration at night? Any idea?

    • @InteractiveDNA
      @InteractiveDNA 3 роки тому

      @@TheGreatExplorer You film the card with a little light you have. The drone will see the gray card. And you pick the grey color from that. Make sure the the White balance on the drone does not change, set to manual mode. You just need to get some gray color from where you took off.

  • @drone_labs_
    @drone_labs_ 3 роки тому +1

    I have problem to edit RAW photo files from Nano plus. Photos are green after import to Light Room. Jpg are great, but how to handle with ryyb RAW?

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому

      I think most of our editing apps see our photos as RGB, I haven’t found a workaround for this in my editing app. I’m using affinity photos for my edit. All the tuning seems off due to the RYYB Color space, maybe there’s some settings in our editing software to change this.
      I did a video mentioning this issue too.

    • @07kevlar
      @07kevlar 3 роки тому

      i had no issues with aurora hdr or luminar from skylum editing dng files.

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому

      @@07kevlar Our photos looks green in RAW files due to the RYYB color filters, may i know how do u make ur editing software read this color array correctly?

    • @07kevlar
      @07kevlar 3 роки тому

      @@TheGreatExplorer Luminar 4

  • @no15minutecities
    @no15minutecities 2 роки тому +2

    BIG MISTAKE AUTEL with the Nano+ sensor!!!

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  2 роки тому

      But after several updates, the camera can do 48mp and shoot in LOG. Kind of beefy for a tiny drone this size

  • @georgevwalking
    @georgevwalking 3 роки тому +1

    Very interesting video great work
    Can we have a day comparison of the video in auto mode
    Thank you

  • @neo57611
    @neo57611 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks this was a great tutorial on the newer RYYB sensors. Sounds like we need to update our editing platforms to handle the Newer Sensor so they can tune better to the change in filtering light....thanks again. Hope Autel gives us the tools to make up our own editing minds. Lol 😆
    I actually think this RYYB sensor will give you many more options in the future.....

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому +1

      Most welcome. Probably in the future, if more camera started to implement RYYB color filter. This is good especially for drones since we are taking videos and photos from an angle so high up.

    • @neo57611
      @neo57611 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheGreatExplorer 👍

    • @neo57611
      @neo57611 3 роки тому +2

      Another thought, Autel seems to understand there is more to photography than just keeping the statisquo nothing wrong with giving the consumer more to choose from. I like that in a company, and the horizon is so level.....Autel putting their best foot forward.

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому +1

      It's always good to have something new and fresh for the consumer

  • @gregwade7974
    @gregwade7974 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks for that, very informative.. 👍

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks for stopping by!

    • @dariomuz8253
      @dariomuz8253 3 роки тому +1

      Big test GE,i share with you.Thanks for subtitles😀👍

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому

      @@dariomuz8253 Hey Dario, no problem. I do hope the subtitles are accurate or at least understandable as i couldn't understand Italian :)

    • @dariomuz8253
      @dariomuz8253 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheGreatExplorer yes subtitles in italian is accurate, no perfect but well done for it

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому

      Cool!

  • @pointofviewgr
    @pointofviewgr 3 роки тому +1

    Nice comparison 👍

  • @geodrone7643
    @geodrone7643 3 роки тому

    Hi, put the DNG's somewhere we can download pls.
    Tks.

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому

      Hello, unfortunately, i'm still not able to find a fix to remove the metadata on the DNG Files without changing the file format. Sorry about that.

    • @geodrone7643
      @geodrone7643 3 роки тому

      @@TheGreatExplorer photo Exifer and select Remove all Metadata. That easy. :)

  • @neo57611
    @neo57611 3 роки тому +1

    Wonder if DJI will go to a RYYB sensor.

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому

      I’m not so sure, probably not since they need to keep a safe distance with Huawei and avoid making Hasselblad unhappy.

    • @shapethefuturetech6005
      @shapethefuturetech6005 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheGreatExplorer They will use the same 50M sony sensor but not RYYB. BTW, DJI owns the Hasselblad brand now.

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому

      @@shapethefuturetech6005 That's good to know. Thanks for sharing!

    • @postmandelivers9669
      @postmandelivers9669 3 роки тому

      don''t think DJI can't leave behind on those futures , autel nano has. DJI MINI 3 would loose the competition

    • @christianpesox
      @christianpesox 3 роки тому

      @@TheGreatExplorer DJI owns Hasselblad.

  • @maxime.ayotte
    @maxime.ayotte 3 роки тому

    The nano+ resolution doesn't show 48mpx. Is it possible to take 48mpx with it or it only let you shoot 12mpx? It would be intesting to see the difference... Great video thanks!

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому +1

      Unfortunately, you do not have the option to choose 48mpx. I think it might come in a later firmware update. It couldn't do automatic HDR too unlike the lite+, u might have to use AEB and merge manually for now. Cheers!

    • @maxime.ayotte
      @maxime.ayotte 3 роки тому +2

      @@TheGreatExplorer I can deal with manual hdr merge, but having access to the 48mpx will probably be a big upgrade. So far the level of detail compared to the mini 2 seem marginal at best from i what i can see... Probably night shot will be another story, im impatient to see your next video!

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому +1

      @@maxime.ayotte If the same logic of the ZMP applies here since that could also take 48MP photos, there will definitely be a response lag given how heavy workload it is to process 4 times the 12mp images on this small drone.
      I’m thinking maybe they are still optimizing their firmware to avoid crashes which would be very bad if it happens up in midair.
      Night footage is definitely a winner vs the mini 2.

    • @shapethefuturetech6005
      @shapethefuturetech6005 3 роки тому +1

      I think the nano+ use some ISP SOC which can't support 48M shot.

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому

      @@shapethefuturetech6005 But they kinda advertise having that high of a megapixel, i do hope they can come up with something to address this.

  • @oscarlnz799
    @oscarlnz799 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks!!

  • @aquarionaquarion6065
    @aquarionaquarion6065 3 роки тому

    Bro, when u purchased the drones (autel, dji, hubsan) online, do you have to pay tax in Malaysia before they send it to you?

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому

      Hi Bro. Yeap, u might need if u are using courier services or u could use forwarder which they will price it in your delivery cost.

    • @aquarionaquarion6065
      @aquarionaquarion6065 3 роки тому

      @@TheGreatExplorer Thanks for the reply. When u bought it from autelpilot may I know how much tax you paid for nano? Thanks

  • @Guide504
    @Guide504 3 роки тому +1

    Is it a 50mp or 12mp?

  • @EMGDroneVision
    @EMGDroneVision 3 роки тому +1

    👏👏👏

  • @jakesdronelife6307
    @jakesdronelife6307 3 роки тому

    Since that fan sucks in the air if I was you I would get a nice landing pad I use my landing pad for every drone I’ve ever owned

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому +1

      Cool. But sometimes the surface I’m taking off is not ideal for a landing pad, like a concrete or a road, where I couldn’t fixate my foldable landing pad. I usually hand catch this when landing since it’s pretty stable.

    • @jakesdronelife6307
      @jakesdronelife6307 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheGreatExplorer hand launch an catch it is my solution in situations like that yes even the mini 2 I can hand catch some say im crazy lol just takes a little concentration

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому +1

      @@jakesdronelife6307 yeap. As long as it wasn’t really too windy, hand catching the mini drones are fine 👍

  • @mikehrenak1390
    @mikehrenak1390 3 роки тому +1

    sorry i wasnt first ill try harder nexted time air2sarmy out

  • @DroneStories
    @DroneStories 3 роки тому

    The nano+, has the same behavior as Air2 (1/2 sensor, QUAD bayer. 12mb and it can take 48mb photos via the quad bayer sensor. But NOT BIG DIFFERENCE IN QUALITY).
    The RYYB SENSOR is more sensitive to the light BUT is more difficult to the post prossecing.
    To much information and I've lost you!!
    The sharpness and the DETAILS is more critical than the colors.
    So which is the most detailed photos???

    • @TheGreatExplorer
      @TheGreatExplorer  3 роки тому

      I think i will not be able to compare the level of sharpness as due to the Shutter Speed difference on these camera when taking these photos. Generally a photo taken at a higher shutter speed does looks sharper than those that aren't, in which case the Autel Evo Lite+ & the Nano + has the advantage.
      Probably on my next test, i'll put more focus on this subject, thanks for bringing this up!

    • @DroneStories
      @DroneStories 3 роки тому

      @@TheGreatExplorer HI my friend. It's not difficult.
      Take photos WITH THE SAME SHUTTER, and then compare them in 150, 200%.
      Try to catch trees or places with "dark" scenes just to investigate in the dynamic ranges, etc.
      How about the range and connectivity??
      Any cimbal shaking?
      Props in shots??

    • @jakesdronelife6307
      @jakesdronelife6307 3 роки тому

      The nano + an the air 2 have different sensor sizes though I believe the regular nano has the 1/2 inch sensor the nano + has a 0.8 inch sensor so there would be some difference’s in low light correct?

    • @DroneStories
      @DroneStories 3 роки тому +1

      @@jakesdronelife6307 The SIZE OF THE PIXELS is more important than the sizes of the sensors!
      And the pixels size is the same for Air2 and Nanos.
      Of course another critical thing is the HARDWARE implementation and THE SOFTWARE...

    • @jakesdronelife6307
      @jakesdronelife6307 3 роки тому +1

      @@DroneStories agreed good point

  • @chankit1407
    @chankit1407 3 роки тому +1

    สวัสดีครับ.👋👋👋

  • @izoyt
    @izoyt 3 роки тому +1

    typical autel bullshitting in image quality by overexposing and applying heavy noise processing, while image have clear heavy orange shift.

  • @tomislavbosnjak7435
    @tomislavbosnjak7435 3 роки тому +1

    1000 buks for that crap when DJI AIR 2 S with ADSB and 1 inch sensor coast 799?No thanks....That NANO CRAP is not competitor to DJI MINI 2,Mini 2 coast 499 for FLY MORE COMBO,And these CRAP is coasting 1000 Bucks....so i prefer MINI 2 for Half a price,and AIR 2 S for 799 with Haseblad optics and 2 more obstacle sensors.........

    • @armandoferreira8790
      @armandoferreira8790 3 роки тому

      Autel Nano+ combo has the same price as the Mavic Air 2 combo (1049€), that's the comparison to make and the Nano+ has a better sensor.
      The Air 2s combo costs 1329€ which is much more expensive (30%) and of course is a much better drone.

    • @jasonlee4267
      @jasonlee4267 3 роки тому

      you do NOT get hassleblad sensor on the air 2s either