Jonty i thought about that too ahah fake manufacturers are having bigger income than adidas since they enslaved ( probably paying less than 1 euro per employer)
Trust. I've made plenty of money because I have a friend who's a supplier of knock off jerseys so I sell them to people I know and on kijiji. I'm not gunna say how much exactly I've made but it's quite a lot that I'd be able to take 6 months off of my full time job and have all expenses paid for still plus take a 3 week vacation.
Of course they don't. Also if PL Clubs have their stadiums half full they would still be making money. You should make a video on this too since it's a disgrace clubs are pricing tickets so high. It's good away ticket prices are capped at £30 but changes need to be made for home ticket prices now.
I can understand for particluar matches tickets will be higher for example I do not mind paying a bit more for a ticket to Liverpool v.s Manchester United or Arsenal vs Chelsea because it is a high quaility fixture. Yet if you expect me to pay the same price for a FA Cup match vs Preston North End that is simply trying to take advantage of fans and if your club makes it to Europa or Champions league it is 10 times worse. I start to wonder do they even want fans at the matches or the owners only want fans who can afford the outragous prices to go.
Actually the atmosphere plays a big role in the drama so if the stadiums were not full the TV product would look crap. Have you watched teams forced to play in quiet stadiums due to UEFA bans or Barcelona recently during the Catalonian crisis? It just doesn't feel the same at all. Also watching football without TV commentators also can feel a bit odd. So while in theory, having half full stadiums will see that lost ticket revenue covered by TV revenue, the TV product would eventually suffer.
Bradley Smith It's fake because it's literally impossible to sell that many shirts in one day. The very best and most marketable clubs in the world are lucky to sell that many in a year, nevermind with the print of only one player. It's a made up number that became viral. @lacasacablog on Twitter has explained that better than me. Check him out.
Bradley Smith Santiago is an idiot who believes a group of people who sell pirated jerseys and other merchandise who happen to be From Argentina. Ill check him \
Don’t Juventus have a different deal? They sell their kits on their website and reportedly get a higher percentage because they do more themselves. Maybe I’m mistaken but if not how are you going to make a video about Ronaldo shirt sales at Juventus and not mention Juventus shirt sale scheme
I think in those situations, club shops just act as secondary retailers. Adidas will print a certain amount for Juventus to sell on their own if they want, just like every club shop has football kits. But these sales to loyal supporters who visit your club shop or website, will be a small percentage of the global market share owned by Adidas and Nike, which is where the real money comes from. Juventus don't have the resources to market and distribute kits to some kid in Japan who loves Italian football but Adidas can.
So if brands like Adidas or Nike are the ones who profit the most from a transfer like Ronaldo's are they allowed to help clubs purchase players or help negotiations between clubs?
No they're in a different business line, creating all kinds of clothing and footwear all around the world. Clubs are just selling their brand for the clothes companies to make products off. Plus if Adidas or Nike started intervening between internal club football politics in a big way then that would cause conflicts of interest. It is in the best interest for Adidas and Nike which are like a global duopoly to low ball all the top clubs around the world because no one else can really offer their sportswear marketing and distribution services on a global scale.
Solid analysis. I think that making the Juventus brand relevant again is worth more than what they would get back from shirt sales anyways. Even though Juventus has had success in recent years, they’ll have even more eyes on them now with CR7 in the XI.
Frankly, Jeep would have to pay me to wear the jersey, or at least provide it gratis. I'm still wondering--thought admittedly not enough to Google it--how much Jeep's sponsorship cost will go up, if it's not already locked in several years in advance. That being the case, if I were the team I'd still like to see a clause in the contract that makes allowances for extraordinary events, for example signing a player who will cause millions of jerseys to be sold, and potentially billions of additional eyes to see the brand's name.
Whoa, bringing back the Whale. Good point. That's what I get for not researching first. In the back of my head I think I was aware that the club had been owned by the Agnellis, but didn't make the connection from Fiat to Fiat-Chrysler, which inludes Jeep of course. That being said, payments will still have to be made for tax and legal transparency. And while Famiglia Agnelli (through Exor N.V.) controls a large part of FCA and a majority of Juventus, there are other shareholder fingers in those pies who might want to see their side exploit such a momentus transfer, or others who, rightly or wrongly, believe that tens of millions on kit sponsorship in a growing but still middling Jeep market is misspent.
All these shirt sale contracts are incredibly complex with armies of lawyers negotiating the clauses. So there would be some performance related add ons. I think these are baked into the cake of extra bonuses which the football club will have royalties on in addition to their flat annual payment by the clothes manufacturer. So if United saw an extraordinary uptick in sales after Pogba was signed, those extra 1 million shirts sold that year beyond the usual Adidas estimate, would see United get like 10 percent in a bonus or something.
Everything said here is literally a copy of an article of the Independant... I would say it would be useful to quote your sources, otherwise it is blatant stealing of content.
madrid got their money back three months later from ronaldo shirt sales. it's because Madrid has the second biggest fanbase in the world behind united. while juve......
Madrid don't print their own kits. They like every football club get a flat free from the clothes manufacturer for their intellectual brand. These kit deals are basically like professional athlete sponsorship deals. Lebron James doesn't get paid for every shoe Nike sells but gets a flat annual fee for the right of Nike to use his image to print shoes which he'll wear on the court. I think there should be a decent bonus for extraordinary sale years beyond a target but I doubt it was enough for Madrid to recoup the entire 100 million euros or so fee that Ronaldo cost.
thats not true. same type of rumor as Ronaldo. www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/neymar-transfer-psg-barcelona-latest-shirt-sales-world-record-198m-a7874731.html
you mean nike earned lots of $$$ with jersey sales and psg obviously like it is with jersey sales got nothing or like 10% at the very most for maybe 5-10 million
I wonder how many fake ronaldo shirts have been purchased
Jonty i thought about that too ahah fake manufacturers are having bigger income than adidas since they enslaved ( probably paying less than 1 euro per employer)
I was in Benidorm a few weeks ago and you couldn't walk anywhere without seeing one
@@joaolancha9227 you dont think Nike and Adidas use slaves??
Trust. I've made plenty of money because I have a friend who's a supplier of knock off jerseys so I sell them to people I know and on kijiji. I'm not gunna say how much exactly I've made but it's quite a lot that I'd be able to take 6 months off of my full time job and have all expenses paid for still plus take a 3 week vacation.
i know some sellers from china that will sell you one for 11$ usd
Of course they don't. Also if PL Clubs have their stadiums half full they would still be making money. You should make a video on this too since it's a disgrace clubs are pricing tickets so high. It's good away ticket prices are capped at £30 but changes need to be made for home ticket prices now.
I can understand for particluar matches tickets will be higher for example I do not mind paying a bit more for a ticket to Liverpool v.s Manchester United or Arsenal vs Chelsea because it is a high quaility fixture. Yet if you expect me to pay the same price for a FA Cup match vs Preston North End that is simply trying to take advantage of fans and if your club makes it to Europa or Champions league it is 10 times worse. I start to wonder do they even want fans at the matches or the owners only want fans who can afford the outragous prices to go.
M 4 the 8
Actually the atmosphere plays a big role in the drama so if the stadiums were not full the TV product would look crap. Have you watched teams forced to play in quiet stadiums due to UEFA bans or Barcelona recently during the Catalonian crisis? It just doesn't feel the same at all. Also watching football without TV commentators also can feel a bit odd. So while in theory, having half full stadiums will see that lost ticket revenue covered by TV revenue, the TV product would eventually suffer.
520k in only 24 hours? Amazing
xRDxutter Pocket change for folks like me
It's fake.
Santiago Bauzá shut up messi fan
Bradley Smith It's fake because it's literally impossible to sell that many shirts in one day. The very best and most marketable clubs in the world are lucky to sell that many in a year, nevermind with the print of only one player. It's a made up number that became viral. @lacasacablog on Twitter has explained that better than me. Check him out.
Bradley Smith Santiago is an idiot who believes a group of people who sell pirated jerseys and other merchandise who happen to be From Argentina. Ill check him
\
Wonder if Nike is regretting not doing Juventus kit now
@Barcelona Lover but teams with nike kits these last years are fewer than before !!
Don’t Juventus have a different deal? They sell their kits on their website and reportedly get a higher percentage because they do more themselves. Maybe I’m mistaken but if not how are you going to make a video about Ronaldo shirt sales at Juventus and not mention Juventus shirt sale scheme
Adidas are still the manufacturers and main distributors so even if Juve do a bit themselves the percentage is probably minuscule
Because Copa hardly does research for videos and is just a money grab via UA-cam ad revenue
No it is not, the percentage that adidas receives is minuscule compared to the amount that Juventus receive.
I think in those situations, club shops just act as secondary retailers. Adidas will print a certain amount for Juventus to sell on their own if they want, just like every club shop has football kits. But these sales to loyal supporters who visit your club shop or website, will be a small percentage of the global market share owned by Adidas and Nike, which is where the real money comes from. Juventus don't have the resources to market and distribute kits to some kid in Japan who loves Italian football but Adidas can.
This channel is brilliant.
Seamus Coleman? They got him for 40k. I’m sure over a long time 40k is made
Like when Ibra signed for Man U his jersey sales were enough to cover his wage for the year :')
I bet Everton have paid off the 70k they paid for Coleman off with shirt sales
So if brands like Adidas or Nike are the ones who profit the most from a transfer like Ronaldo's are they allowed to help clubs purchase players or help negotiations between clubs?
No they're in a different business line, creating all kinds of clothing and footwear all around the world. Clubs are just selling their brand for the clothes companies to make products off. Plus if Adidas or Nike started intervening between internal club football politics in a big way then that would cause conflicts of interest. It is in the best interest for Adidas and Nike which are like a global duopoly to low ball all the top clubs around the world because no one else can really offer their sportswear marketing and distribution services on a global scale.
Great video, didn’t think Copa 90 would
produce such educational content.
Solid analysis. I think that making the Juventus brand relevant again is worth more than what they would get back from shirt sales anyways.
Even though Juventus has had success in recent years, they’ll have even more eyes on them now with CR7 in the XI.
Frankly, Jeep would have to pay me to wear the jersey, or at least provide it gratis. I'm still wondering--thought admittedly not enough to Google it--how much Jeep's sponsorship cost will go up, if it's not already locked in several years in advance. That being the case, if I were the team I'd still like to see a clause in the contract that makes allowances for extraordinary events, for example signing a player who will cause millions of jerseys to be sold, and potentially billions of additional eyes to see the brand's name.
I thought the people who own Juventus is the same company who own Jeep so I would imagine Jeep pays nothing for shirt sponsorship
Whoa, bringing back the Whale. Good point. That's what I get for not researching first. In the back of my head I think I was aware that the club had been owned by the Agnellis, but didn't make the connection from Fiat to Fiat-Chrysler, which inludes Jeep of course. That being said, payments will still have to be made for tax and legal transparency. And while Famiglia Agnelli (through Exor N.V.) controls a large part of FCA and a majority of Juventus, there are other shareholder fingers in those pies who might want to see their side exploit such a momentus transfer, or others who, rightly or wrongly, believe that tens of millions on kit sponsorship in a growing but still middling Jeep market is misspent.
All these shirt sale contracts are incredibly complex with armies of lawyers negotiating the clauses. So there would be some performance related add ons. I think these are baked into the cake of extra bonuses which the football club will have royalties on in addition to their flat annual payment by the clothes manufacturer. So if United saw an extraordinary uptick in sales after Pogba was signed, those extra 1 million shirts sold that year beyond the usual Adidas estimate, would see United get like 10 percent in a bonus or something.
More of these please
I wish you had gone into more detail about HOW they ACTUALLY recover the money from such transfers
Song plzzzz
Can be as it's all business atlast
Good video. Clear and concise
Great video
So ! They do pay for the transfer or not !?
Bring ngolo kante
Know he knows how to talk english
The chevrolet sponsor on the Man U jerseys make it ugly as fuck.
Who owns the fan shops then?
Hey if derby days does come back soon, please do the basque derby or any derby including Athletic Club. Like if you agree and spread this.
1017
Please make a video on hearts!? 👍🇱🇻
ITS JJ Apolgizes but Copa 90 does not produce any videos dedicated to the study of cardiology :)
Jonathan LeBrun ok 😂
Can they pay the wage of the player
So did they pay for Ronaldo or not? Lmao I know it didn’t but I would have liked to know the numbers of juve.
Pyuma
Everything said here is literally a copy of an article of the Independant...
I would say it would be useful to quote your sources, otherwise it is blatant stealing of content.
lot of lost revenue - clubs should have thier own brands
aye timbsy
I LIVE C.RONALDO
too much business
They sold half a million shirts or half a million pounds? The narrator and the graphic contradict themselves.
Rodrigo Jerez Tapia shirts
Only cr7 can sell that much
Who's here after Messi sold $170M in 2 days?
Hi
Lazy video, could have at least looked at it hypothetically
madrid got their money back three months later from ronaldo shirt sales. it's because Madrid has the second biggest fanbase in the world behind united. while juve......
That's a myth, was debunked years ago by Real themselves.
Madrid don't print their own kits. They like every football club get a flat free from the clothes manufacturer for their intellectual brand. These kit deals are basically like professional athlete sponsorship deals. Lebron James doesn't get paid for every shoe Nike sells but gets a flat annual fee for the right of Nike to use his image to print shoes which he'll wear on the court. I think there should be a decent bonus for extraordinary sale years beyond a target but I doubt it was enough for Madrid to recoup the entire 100 million euros or so fee that Ronaldo cost.
EVEN the deads bought CR7's shirt
insta: mohiuddin101 read my line again. You can get it
DO A VIDEO ABOUT WHO SHOULD REPLACE MOURINHO AS MAN UNITED MANAGER.
Then ronaldo would of been a billionaire
4th
Lol man has a football channel and can't say 'chiellini'
Ronaldo star of world. Fake shirts****
Finally !!!
Psg paid for neymars record transfer fee within a week from shirt sales
thats not true. same type of rumor as Ronaldo.
www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/neymar-transfer-psg-barcelona-latest-shirt-sales-world-record-198m-a7874731.html
you mean nike earned lots of $$$ with jersey sales and psg obviously like it is with jersey sales got nothing or like 10% at the very most for maybe 5-10 million
Third
5th
2nd
First.
Ferris_Faktea Renthlei 2nd