Why LEGO Star Wars UCS HOTH SUCKED!

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 737

  • @MandRproductions
    @MandRproductions  4 роки тому +510

    I like this style lol I want to do more of it.

    • @wopanater2725
      @wopanater2725 4 роки тому +15

      I don’t consider myself a true collector of LEGO Star Wars but I do have a room full of sets. I liked this set as a play set and I do think it isn’t very display able but is still like it. I’m not one of those people who hat on others opinions and I really liked your criticisms

    • @kubaostrowski02
      @kubaostrowski02 4 роки тому +10

      MandRproeductions I like this new professional style of of videos

    • @jacobday406
      @jacobday406 4 роки тому +3

      Great video, loved the intro! Looking forward to seeing more of this

    • @yungtito07
      @yungtito07 4 роки тому +1

      Hey Ryan! Me too.

    • @atlanticbrickstudios
      @atlanticbrickstudios 4 роки тому

      Do a Yavin Lego. It would be amazing

  • @harwickbranch
    @harwickbranch 4 роки тому +884

    Literally every problem with this set could have been avoided if they hadn’t called it UCS

    • @squidilo4086
      @squidilo4086 4 роки тому +37

      And with a name and price change

    • @rtasvadum3531
      @rtasvadum3531 4 роки тому +27

      The real question is why they have downgraded the snow troopers in the 2019/2020 sets. (They don’t have the backpack and the skirt thing they used to have around their legs)

    • @speck5503
      @speck5503 4 роки тому

      Agreed

    • @SisypheanTask1812
      @SisypheanTask1812 4 роки тому

      I agree with you.
      Ur a man of culture as well

    • @rtasvadum3531
      @rtasvadum3531 4 роки тому

      @iicrystal_parrotii See my reply about the snow troopers?

  • @chandlerl2189
    @chandlerl2189 4 роки тому +298

    The Lego Star Wars history channel
    The series we need, but not the one we deserve

  • @fir3spraybricks643
    @fir3spraybricks643 4 роки тому +247

    I love this eerie-ish LEGO Star Wars history vibes! I hope you continue with this series.

  • @LegoGamer5502
    @LegoGamer5502 4 роки тому +101

    LEGO: this is a good UCS set so we’re releasing it
    Us: “unfortunately for you, history will not see it that way” - Lord Maul

  • @SandsGC
    @SandsGC 4 роки тому +16

    Showing All Those UCS Sets On Your Brickset Account Was Definitely A Subtle Flex

  • @MythicBricks
    @MythicBricks 4 роки тому +106

    This set will always have a special place in my heart. It was one of the first sets that grabbed my attention and got me into Lego Star Wars. I saved for MONTHS for this baby. I agree it’s probably not UCS, but this is a damn good Lego Star Wars set and no one can convince me otherwise. As a kid, I absolutely loved it and that’s how I know the playability worked.

    • @hkr1240
      @hkr1240 4 роки тому +3

      I agree.

    • @timmummert3803
      @timmummert3803 4 роки тому

      👍👍👍

    • @JonJonJonJonJonJonJonJon
      @JonJonJonJonJonJonJonJon 4 роки тому +3

      I would have absolutely loved this as a child. My god. The difference is ADULTS complaining it carried the UCS moniker

    • @cisbruinen07
      @cisbruinen07 3 роки тому

      Yeah, I got it for my birthday 3 year’s ago, it’s amazing

    • @chanchito4401
      @chanchito4401 3 роки тому +2

      TIL 2016 was long ago enough that people were kids oh GOD

  • @saltyvgc
    @saltyvgc 4 роки тому +82

    Ngl i actually really want this set and wish i was into lego when it released

    • @TheDailyBrick
      @TheDailyBrick 4 роки тому +7

      Saltyyyx I like it bc it had my first set built into it (the Hoth wampa cave)

    • @deathtroyermaster7443
      @deathtroyermaster7443 4 роки тому +5

      Lol me too its a good play set but a display eeeeeeeh

    • @deathtroyermaster7443
      @deathtroyermaster7443 4 роки тому +2

      And actually i dont like the UCS i like play sets

    • @saltyvgc
      @saltyvgc 4 роки тому +1

      @@TheDailyBrick oh nice, i have the 2009 echo base set that was released fot the 20th anniversary

    • @TheDailyBrick
      @TheDailyBrick 4 роки тому

      Saltyyyx nice!

  • @isaacsmith8308
    @isaacsmith8308 4 роки тому +27

    Nobody:
    M&R: *releases video of why a set was bad 4 years after said set releases*

  • @killachicken7577
    @killachicken7577 4 роки тому +49

    "Defense of Hoth" probably would've done a little better as the name...

    • @Ex0dus24
      @Ex0dus24 4 роки тому +4

      even that is misleading because wtf are thy defending against? the awful sales?

    • @blakchristianbale
      @blakchristianbale 3 роки тому +2

      Why not just Echo Base?

    • @Naoto-kun1085
      @Naoto-kun1085 Рік тому

      Probably, but it's also a much more boring name. I think the name is good, just that the fans need to adjust their priorities!

    • @killachicken7577
      @killachicken7577 Рік тому

      @@Naoto-kun1085 That’s a weird take. Adjust their priorities?? If you’re calling a set “Assault on Hoth”, give us something to assault WITH. It’s not that deep, man. “Adjust their priorities”. Sheesh

    • @Naoto-kun1085
      @Naoto-kun1085 Рік тому

      @@killachicken7577 It's a way weirder take to say that an entire set is bad just because of the title. Does the title change the piece count, the minifigures, or the build? The box art clearly shows all of the contents of the set, so you know everything you're getting just by looking slightly to the right. I rarely even look at the set's name when I buy them, I buy the set for it's contents. It's just fans being petty. ☠️

  • @codykohleffel8731
    @codykohleffel8731 4 роки тому +69

    0:47 is one of the biggest missed Opportunities to say hello there:(

  • @NicktheBrickOG
    @NicktheBrickOG 4 роки тому +29

    I thought this was an old video for a second...

  • @VaderBrix
    @VaderBrix 4 роки тому +42

    No one in 2020:
    Not even a single soul in 2020:
    Ryan in 2020: ThE 2016 UcS AsSuLt oN HoTh WaS BaD!

    • @tamaracassidy720
      @tamaracassidy720 4 роки тому +6

      He’s right tho

    • @VaderBrix
      @VaderBrix 4 роки тому +1

      @@tamaracassidy720 True, but aren't there more important stuff to talk about or something? Shouldn't this topic be covered in 2016-2017?

    • @VaderBrix
      @VaderBrix 4 роки тому +2

      I didn’t even buy it, lad.

  • @CGstudios1102
    @CGstudios1102 6 місяців тому +3

    Personally, I don't understand why people hate on this set so much? I think it is an awsome set!👍

  • @JangoSkett
    @JangoSkett 4 роки тому +12

    Bro I can’t lie the effort gone into that intro was awesome, can’t wait to get into this vid

  • @WeiAnimations
    @WeiAnimations 4 роки тому +25

    0:48 BB8 IS ON THE TURRET THINGY AND IS ABOUT TO BLOW EVERYTHING UP!

  • @tristan6687
    @tristan6687 4 роки тому +17

    Love this kind of documentary style/lego history type of video, as it is super professional and high quality in my opinion, super entertaining as well, and I am very much looking forward for more to come in the future!!!!

  • @andrewleggott6821
    @andrewleggott6821 4 роки тому +2

    Just forget the fact that its called a UCS set and the minor inconveniences and just appreciate all the cool play features as if its a playset. This set is awesome for what it is, just not a good UCS set

  • @lewisfrost
    @lewisfrost 4 роки тому +34

    Me: hasn’t watched 1 second of the video yet....
    Also me: Agreed.

  • @the1andonlyjawa
    @the1andonlyjawa 4 роки тому +41

    Everyone: When’s the next Brick Buster?!
    Ryan:

  • @rory_pond1701
    @rory_pond1701 4 роки тому +3

    This was the first Echo Base-style set from LEGO that I _didn't_ buy, and for precisely the reason that Ryan gives: it felt like a compilation of several previous sets.
    But I really wish LEGO would release a separate, movie-accurate shield generator set. I'd buy that in a heartbeat.

  • @shipmancinema
    @shipmancinema 4 роки тому +22

    0:35 I see the editing game ryan

  • @sonloto
    @sonloto 4 роки тому +1

    Assaulth on Hoth should've been a playable set rather than a UCS. And the name should've been "Hoth Battle Base."

  • @samlowther9487
    @samlowther9487 4 роки тому +4

    This set is actually really good in my opinion. People keep judging it way too harshly just because it's labelled as a ucs set and it's name. The builds i actually quite like and when you have it all spread out on a table you get a damn lot for your money.

  • @friedpasta2983
    @friedpasta2983 4 роки тому +4

    LEGO: this is the UCS set called ASSAULT ON HOTH
    Literally everybody else: lies, deception

  • @Jack771-69
    @Jack771-69 4 роки тому +1

    Imo, UCS sets should be vehicles only because you can’t make a structure Minifig scale, but you can do that for vehicles. UCS should be for vehicles. Master builder should be for structures/buildings (could city, echo base, Death Star).

  • @regalplays7135
    @regalplays7135 4 роки тому +3

    I actually like how it was originally supposed to release alongside the AT-AT, shows how the designers actually had a good idea in mind

  • @julielee6830
    @julielee6830 4 роки тому +3

    So basically the set was hated cause of it's box

  • @ethan9hx920
    @ethan9hx920 4 роки тому +1

    Unfortunately, because of the bad circumstances of this set's release, we may not get more of this type of set, like a Master Builder Series Endor. I'm not a big playset person(more display), but I love the Cloud City and this, and I would die for an Endor one

  • @k-874
    @k-874 4 роки тому

    LEGO even kept the unnecessary look out tower from the UCS Assault on Hoth to even the Action Battle set Assault on Echo Base! The Look out tower is even in the exact same spot!

  • @legogeek7571
    @legogeek7571 4 роки тому +1

    Your videos are getting better and better in style, Ryan. I enjoyed this but think you have misty taken previous content and made it look better... the exception being the information about it being delayed. Would LOVE to see more of this kind of stuff..:maybe on exactly what you criticise about the Hoth sets, collections of smaller sets that go well together. Or more in depth reviews of UCS sets, including new info on the context of their releases... Very “slick” video to watch, mate.

  • @kyleswi764
    @kyleswi764 4 роки тому +3

    Why does this feel like this is a professional tv show

  • @TheLegoPorg
    @TheLegoPorg 4 роки тому +2

    Nothing to do with the video but important: we could be getting a new lego gun part/skin for the medium rifle blaster for lego star wars, if you look at the first order part in the lego the complete saga trailer you can see a first order stormtrooper holding a blaster rifle with a black and white gun for the first order it will be cool to see this and I think this could become an actual thing soon because almost everything in the lego games are actual lego sets.

  • @cctrooper2727
    @cctrooper2727 4 роки тому +3

    They should actually do something like that: have a couple set that you can connect to each other!

  • @jkirl
    @jkirl 4 роки тому +6

    loved the new style not being negative but seems more professional and engaging to watch than usual.

  • @StillSaber
    @StillSaber 4 роки тому +1

    Actually the real reason why the Wampa can't fit in his cave door was because he needs to cut back on all them Tauntaun snacks

  • @buildingbrix3396
    @buildingbrix3396 4 роки тому

    LEGO should start making Starwars sets that could be smaller sets that when combined would make a larger battle. Ex. Have a small tree with a Ewok and scout trooper and then have more small sets for Endor. I would like this more than the one off sets they’ve been doing

  • @fractalelf7760
    @fractalelf7760 3 роки тому

    It's time for a Master Builder redo of this set. The AT-AT is out, and the AT-ST is here as well, I really do believe the upcoming large cost set is going to be a MB version with a lot of the flaws fixed and renamed simply 'Defense on Hoth'. If you pair this set with the original Echo base on Hoth and the Bacta tank set, it's fantastic with at least one AT-AT and a squad of Snowtroopers.

  • @eightcoins4401
    @eightcoins4401 4 роки тому

    I feel like they wanted it to be a playset but someone in marketing didnt feel comfortable with it being a 200$ Playset, so it was labelled "UCS"

  • @stettkt1
    @stettkt1 4 роки тому +2

    Ngl, kinda want this set a little bit now, especially since we're getting a new AT AT this summer...

    • @Rand0mN0rwegianGuy
      @Rand0mN0rwegianGuy 4 роки тому +3

      Kevin S
      Right? I mean, something like this would totally be perfect for like a little MOC-build or something with this new upcoming AT-AT, for example 👀

    • @stettkt1
      @stettkt1 4 роки тому +1

      @@Rand0mN0rwegianGuy agreed! And it probably wouldn't be that hard to get the parts needed to add one more nodule to the shield generator. I would not be surprised if someone has already adapted that section of the set to be more accurate to the film in that regard.

  • @TheLegoPorg
    @TheLegoPorg 4 роки тому +3

    It did suck, will you do more of those history videos? Would be cool :)

  • @lilkimme4728
    @lilkimme4728 4 роки тому +8

    it was a great gift for christmas, i loved it as a play set!

  • @AltHistoryByOsov
    @AltHistoryByOsov 4 роки тому +1

    UCS hoth: AAAH! SO BAD
    MBS hoth (renamed same set): THATS WHAT I CALL A GOOD SET!

    • @blakchristianbale
      @blakchristianbale 3 роки тому +1

      Not really, it’s more that the people who hated it wouldn’t have really taken notice of it, since it wasn’t being marketed to them

  • @pork5473
    @pork5473 9 місяців тому

    “those sets…wouldve been damn near retired” so much passion in that sentence. i love this channel.

  • @JustSaauce
    @JustSaauce 4 роки тому +1

    I actually really enjoyed this video! Keep it up!

  • @dylans1334
    @dylans1334 4 роки тому

    With an atat coming out later this year it would be a good idea for Lego to re release this not call it a ucs set but an mbs. Fix the Wampa cave, the ion cannon, the generator and throw in a few snow troopers. Possibly add a slightly smaller atst to work with the scale of the atat. I reckon it would sell pretty well

  • @rodio8291
    @rodio8291 4 роки тому +4

    I'm 0:38 seconds into the video and I already love this series

  • @Tom-ij7jd
    @Tom-ij7jd 4 роки тому +2

    I’m saving up for this set, hoth is my favourite planet and I would love to get it. I’m also making a hoth moc soon

    • @echo-eh8jz
      @echo-eh8jz 3 роки тому

      hows it going?

    • @Tom-ij7jd
      @Tom-ij7jd 3 роки тому +1

      @@echo-eh8jz haven’t started yet 😅 decided that after watching a couple vids that I can spend money on better things than this set, major set back as the UK is in lockdown and it was going to be built with my friend so now we gotta wait ages

    • @echo-eh8jz
      @echo-eh8jz 3 роки тому

      @@Tom-ij7jd its a shame what lockdown has done

    • @Tom-ij7jd
      @Tom-ij7jd 3 роки тому

      @@echo-eh8jz damn right

    • @echo-eh8jz
      @echo-eh8jz 3 роки тому

      @@Tom-ij7jd wait, do u have a lego tiktok account. ur name rings a bell

  • @Tfpforever
    @Tfpforever 4 роки тому +1

    Unexpected but I like it next one should be why LEGO waited on making the 501st battle pack

  • @ryx4992
    @ryx4992 4 роки тому

    yo ryan just wanna say thank you for being my primary source of entartainment during these tough times and i hope your doing well, keep up the good work :)

  • @greglancaster9053
    @greglancaster9053 4 роки тому +1

    The Rebel Ion Cannon is one of my favorite scenes in all of Star Wars. I would love to see it done greater justice with a larger, more accurate build.

  • @osubass
    @osubass 4 роки тому

    The ONLY reason I bought this set was because it included my absolute favorite Rebel pilot, Wedge Antilles.
    Only to see the exact same Wedge figure released in 75268 for waaaaaay cheaper.

  • @thearcko6137
    @thearcko6137 4 роки тому +1

    In those clips of the designers talking about the set I felt really bad since they sounded so sad that the set they made was hated so much. I also think the set is not good but still it’s just sad

  • @jacobokazaki759
    @jacobokazaki759 4 роки тому

    That was some pretty killer editing at the beginning. great job on the video

  • @Thatoneguy-sm6vu
    @Thatoneguy-sm6vu 4 роки тому +3

    All they needed to do was ad about 5 or 6 snow troopers, one or two more imperial snow speeders,a tie fighter (with a pilot) to go with the Rebel snow speeder ,And I wish it had another ton ton because I love the mold
    And all the stuff he said

    • @eightcoins4401
      @eightcoins4401 4 роки тому

      UM Tie Fighters werent on Hoth.

    • @Thatoneguy-sm6vu
      @Thatoneguy-sm6vu 4 роки тому +1

      Eight Coins actually there was they where in the sky above Hoth with the rest of the fleet

    • @Thatoneguy-sm6vu
      @Thatoneguy-sm6vu 4 роки тому +1

      You can see them in Star Wars battlefront 2 and that makes it cannon

  • @ohno4112
    @ohno4112 4 роки тому +2

    How can you tell ucs hoth is not a ucs it's only a 12+

  • @quickbricks6647
    @quickbricks6647 4 роки тому

    It’s funny how you made this video now. I purchased this set just a couple days ago. I love this set, one of the best UCS sets imo. Most UCS sets are pointless because they really don’t go along with any other non-UCS sets. The only good UCS sets are this set, the Ewok Village, cloud City, the Death Star and if you count it, the Tantive-IV. But I respect your opinion about this set.

    • @blakchristianbale
      @blakchristianbale 3 роки тому

      The point of UCS sets is to be display models for adult collectors. It’s fine to not be into that, I’m not really into that, but saying that this is the best one because it goes with regular sets just makes it sound like you’re not into UCS sets as a concept, because if you’re judging it by the interests of UCS buyers this is pretty indisputably the worst one

  • @-Seek-17
    @-Seek-17 6 місяців тому +1

    I really like this set. I never knew this was a ucs set tho

  • @OneLEGOHero
    @OneLEGOHero 4 роки тому

    I think the only mistake they have done is dont having a At At Walker out at the time to Go along. I really love the Set and think its great

  • @westcoastlego5602
    @westcoastlego5602 4 роки тому +1

    4:54 wait, is that your Brickset page? Did you buy the original UCS Falcon? On another note, great video, I'm looking forward to seeing more installments in this series!

    • @westcoastlego5602
      @westcoastlego5602 4 роки тому

      @Lego Boba Fett I just noticed the tabs underneath the sets saying have/want, but you're probably right, it's probably just a random picture.

  • @coopercampbell7507
    @coopercampbell7507 4 роки тому +1

    I do see how it sucks as a ucs set but it is a amazing set for play

  • @mitchc9167
    @mitchc9167 2 роки тому

    Another couple of notes of why the set was hated:
    1. The inclusion of the Tauntaun feeding pen and lookout tower, and not a medical bay or larger command centre.
    2. The minifigure selection. Leia, Chewbacca and General Rieekan were notable exclusions.
    3. Regarding the lookout tower, the justification for its inclusion was that it was assumed 'every' base had one. A fair assumption, but Echo Base already had some; the Trenches! Just shows that designers seemingly don't know a lot about Star Wars.

  • @thegarbagememechannel6787
    @thegarbagememechannel6787 4 роки тому +1

    I don’t think it’s overall bad but what you’ve said is true about the set
    From recent years it would be a rebellion set with a side mini figure that would be a imperial trooper
    Also the name could be echo base and not be UCS set

  • @boyandimitrov6663
    @boyandimitrov6663 4 роки тому

    Ryan, can you make a video worst to first all Hoth sets?

  • @welshinc5782
    @welshinc5782 4 роки тому

    They should pull a hogwarts and release them as small parts, then release a combo called assault on hoth. Maybe even release a small Falcon and AT-AT like they've done with the slave one

  • @thelamergamer1503
    @thelamergamer1503 4 роки тому

    I wonder? Are any of these pieces exclusive because i kinda want to build a bit of it, like the door and the cannon but ill add a backside to it, please tell me

  • @nicholassnyder9552
    @nicholassnyder9552 4 роки тому +1

    5:33 this is UCS this is just BS

  • @jennyc7543
    @jennyc7543 4 роки тому +1

    Has anyone tried putting this set in the snow to make it look better?
    Edit: I forgot to add if anyone has done that and also combined it with every other Hoth set released as of the time I edited this comment except for the 2007 Hoth Echo Base set.

  • @shipmancinema
    @shipmancinema 4 роки тому +1

    I like to think you weeded through the 1000s of videos uploaded per day on the LEGO channel to find that leak from 2015

  • @rorynoonan6200
    @rorynoonan6200 4 роки тому +19

    Ucs are too expensive for me

  • @takodahager4165
    @takodahager4165 4 роки тому

    I like this video a lot. Do u think it is possible u could do a video of the 2016 UCS Death Star? I know a lot of people were upset about considering after how long the 2008 version was on shelves. Also, could u also do a video on the 2018 imperial landing craft vs the 2007 version? Like how Lego tarnished the troop carrying compartment and only gave 2 sand troopers in the 2018 when it was meant to be an army builder set?

  • @PenPlays
    @PenPlays 4 роки тому

    My goodness. Even designers admitted there was problems. Now, if only they would tell us why...

  • @Angry_Squirrel555
    @Angry_Squirrel555 4 роки тому +1

    The most likely reason that we have a Master Builders Series is due to the backlash over Assault on Hoth being referred to as a UCS.
    As far as the name goes, who cares? A name is a name. My eyes can still see what I’m getting regardless of what it’s called. I bought it. I got a Tauntaun, a Wampa, a second snowspeeder, a bunch of rebel Hoth troopers, and the whole door set-upworked out for a MOC. Sure it may have been mislabeled but that’s hardly solid ground to trash something.

    • @blakchristianbale
      @blakchristianbale 3 роки тому

      The name is a core part of marketing. The UCS audience is a distinct subset of Lego buyers with a specific interest in display pieces, and not necessarily anything else. By calling it UCS, Lego’s saying that this set is meant for people who buy Lego display pieces, when in reality the set has very little display value and would mainly appeal to kids who wanna use it as a toy. And it’s great for those kids, but that’s not who it was marketed to

  • @andrein_501st
    @andrein_501st 4 роки тому

    The only thing I really like for this set is the door entrance the rest of the set is plagued with too many playability features which take away from the design.

  • @BrickBuildingwithNoah
    @BrickBuildingwithNoah 4 роки тому +2

    Great video!

  • @skorpiontamer
    @skorpiontamer 4 роки тому

    Has anyone actually combined all 4 sets at 8:12 and actually compared them to th UCS set? Ryan u should do this if you have all these

  • @stanleyvonhelmst176
    @stanleyvonhelmst176 4 роки тому +1

    This video was awesome. I could definitely tell you put a lot more effort into this video. I'd love to see more high quality content like this in the future

  • @reido387
    @reido387 4 роки тому +1

    They could have easily changed the name to "defense on Hoth" or something similar, which could have helped

    • @reido387
      @reido387 4 роки тому

      Essentially, a majority of the set is focused on the Rebel defense against the imperials, so the name should have reflected that

  • @movieparadoxical8494
    @movieparadoxical8494 4 роки тому +1

    *BB-8 head on top of the turbo laser cannon*

  • @scoutanimations.
    @scoutanimations. 4 роки тому +1

    8:45 mnr says that this is not a bad set. Puts it dead last on his ucs list 🧐

    • @MandRproductions
      @MandRproductions  4 роки тому +2

      BECKHAM ́S COOL BUILDS iirc it’s dead last “because it’s not a UCS set” not necessarily because I think it’s the worst build.

  • @modernmexican274
    @modernmexican274 4 роки тому

    Not gonna lie, this is probably your best video. GREAT intro. Super profesional but still personal which is good. Please do more vids like this. Keep it up!!!

  • @ArthurTaylor2005
    @ArthurTaylor2005 4 роки тому +3

    0:45 *pops out of no-where

  • @ivanbrumwell6230
    @ivanbrumwell6230 4 роки тому +1

    Mandr, I know this doesent really have to do with this video but I have a set idea. 501st vs 212th on umbara from the clone wars umbara arc.
    The set would include waxer and 2 troopers on their side and captain rex with 2 troopers on his side. I imagine their would also be some foliage for the troopers to hide behind and that weird sarlac looking thing. With lego's pricing nowadays I acpect the set to cost around 40 dollars usd. Hope you read this love your channel

  • @joshwarren1076
    @joshwarren1076 4 роки тому

    What is the website/app that you use to keep track of the sets you own that you show at the 4:50 mark @MandRproductions

  • @justthereed5593
    @justthereed5593 4 роки тому +1

    When it was out I always wanted it because I loved the hoth battle but it’s incomplete, and there’s no at at. If you’re gonna make a play set include the people leading the assault.

  • @aydenjenkins8760
    @aydenjenkins8760 4 роки тому

    I love the video essay style. You should definitely do more in the future

  • @thatrandomangrygoose4147
    @thatrandomangrygoose4147 4 роки тому +1

    Theres no need to hate on it for its ranking, Yeah sure its misleading, But, Thats pathetic, Just pathetic, Its basically people want to complain so they pick on UCS hoth just because of its misleading title.
    In short terms, I disagree with all of this, Sure there's its cons, but, its a awesome set.
    If this set would change its name label and a few really really really REALLY minor things, people would say, ''OH ITS THE BEST SET OF THE YEAR'' ''OH THIS SET IS AWESOME'' But No, People have to hate on it for its name.

    • @blakchristianbale
      @blakchristianbale 3 роки тому

      Not really. The people complaining were never gonna buy this set because it wasn’t meant for them, it was meant for kids, this issue is Lego marketed it to them despite it not being meant for them

  • @mariushaakonssen
    @mariushaakonssen 4 роки тому

    Maybe make a video about the action battle sets that released last year, and why you think they flopped. Since we haven't seen them again this year, then they must not have sold too well, (and they also went on sale on LEGO.com in Denmark, don't know about the rest of the world)

  • @m.m.3248
    @m.m.3248 4 роки тому +2

    I love the set anyway

  • @michaelangelo2192
    @michaelangelo2192 4 роки тому +1

    MandR turning into a documentary channel on channel 4

  • @elijahsnow3668
    @elijahsnow3668 4 роки тому

    2016: Where is the AT-AT for the "Assault on Hoth"?
    2020: Where is the Snow Speeder or the Echo Base the new AT-AT could attac?

  • @balloonboy5212
    @balloonboy5212 Рік тому +1

    Its a good set, just not a UCS set.

  • @mariajimenafigueroa233
    @mariajimenafigueroa233 3 роки тому

    How to fix Assault On Hoth: Either removed the USC laybe or made it more accurted (Example: have the Wampa's cave bigger)

  • @kjpitts5609
    @kjpitts5609 4 роки тому +1

    I love this channel, but i disagree, i really like this set.

  • @BuginaRiver
    @BuginaRiver 2 роки тому

    I’d love to see you make more videos in this style again in the future

  • @freddurocher6077
    @freddurocher6077 4 роки тому +1

    You should do it for the LEGO Star Wars buildable figures

  • @msp5616
    @msp5616 4 роки тому

    Love the format of this video and really would like to see more 👍

  • @denny8727
    @denny8727 4 роки тому +2

    4 years later, Ryan revisits this topic 😂

  • @gobrightbricks6016
    @gobrightbricks6016 4 роки тому +9

    Ryan: “Why is it so bad?” Me: “Why ISN’T it so bad...”

  • @patriciorivera762
    @patriciorivera762 4 роки тому +1

    0:45 Why he came out under the table? Xd