On each time I open this model it will ask for input? If yes then it will become tricky to maintain drawing details. Otherwise we can simply use family table to control this situation.
You could disable it from the script in case u find it troublesome. Family tables is a powerful option too. The main selling point about pro program is it’s easier to maintain one larger assembly rather than multiple sub instances and having to verify it after every change. Also, there is cost involved in maintaining part nos for corporations so, each instance adds additional cost (close to 1000$ per part no.) depending on ur PLM software.
Depends on your end goal. I use this feature to drive panel size in an elevator cabin for different values of height and width inputs given by field engineers. You won’t be able to visualise the aesthetics when you use simplified rep and reps don’t affect your bill of material I guess as it just hides features instead of suppressing it.
@@MECH_ADHI simp rep is not hiding parts from a assembly. It suppressed parts and as you know Creo is bi-directional associativity so it will affect your bill of material too.
The point is, pro program lets you automate the manual efforts needed to create reps. You need to manually pick each and every part while creating a rep. Image you have 100 different configurations and it’s really painful to do reps and suppress/Un suppress. It gets even more painful when your piece parts need feature suppressing based on driving parameter. I don’t think we can parametrically control which reps to pick from a sub assembly at top level based on input given at top level.
Need more videos on creo simulation
Sure, will do.
Bro need more vedios on creo mechanism and simulation which has multiple assembly.
On each time I open this model it will ask for input? If yes then it will become tricky to maintain drawing details.
Otherwise we can simply use family table to control this situation.
You could disable it from the script in case u find it troublesome. Family tables is a powerful option too. The main selling point about pro program is it’s easier to maintain one larger assembly rather than multiple sub instances and having to verify it after every change. Also, there is cost involved in maintaining part nos for corporations so, each instance adds additional cost (close to 1000$ per part no.) depending on ur PLM software.
You said for large assembly it's useful right. What if I will use simplified representation for large assembly?? Make sense?
Depends on your end goal. I use this feature to drive panel size in an elevator cabin for different values of height and width inputs given by field engineers. You won’t be able to visualise the aesthetics when you use simplified rep and reps don’t affect your bill of material I guess as it just hides features instead of suppressing it.
@@MECH_ADHI simp rep is not hiding parts from a assembly. It suppressed parts and as you know Creo is bi-directional associativity so it will affect your bill of material too.
The point is, pro program lets you automate the manual efforts needed to create reps. You need to manually pick each and every part while creating a rep. Image you have 100 different configurations and it’s really painful to do reps and suppress/Un suppress. It gets even more painful when your piece parts need feature suppressing based on driving parameter. I don’t think we can parametrically control which reps to pick from a sub assembly at top level based on input given at top level.
In which are u working sir?
I don’t understand your question.
@@MECH_ADHI sorry, in which company are u working?
grea sir i needjob in CREO please
Sorry, I don’t recruit.
Hi.. Do you need jobs on Creo.
Please give me your contact details asap. TIA