A stable Pakistan means the establishment needs a carrot to control the crowd which means re-upping the militancy on Kashmir. Never fall into these 'moderate' traps.
True why does the Indian anchor even bother to invite these Pakistanis on the podcast cant the anchor reply to the paki guy when he says trade the pakis have no money to pay india why shall we trade with them and why shall india bail Pakistan out for them to create more problems in Kashmir and create more unrest for us
The argument that a destabilised Pak is not good for India doesnt hold any water in my opinion. In their better days, their focus was to bleed India through a thousand cuts, lets not forget. Due to their current economic situation, they are unable to focus their ill intent towards us, also being targeted by their other neighbour Afhanistan. They still not have given any credible assurance to the world how they will rise from their mess, in summary, India should watch closely from the side lines and see how the situation pans out . While Wajahat admits Pak needs India currently, the situation would have been totally different had they been in a better economic state, he would have been much more hostile even on the interview than the conciliatory mask he has to reluctantly put on now. Everything boils down to Economic prowess!
agreed. majority pkstnis are jahil & extremist(offensive in the sense & full of hatred). see those street interviews in joke pkstn. Basically they are greedy( lalchi) in nature.
That's a keen observation sir, when you say that Wajahat is reluctantly putting on a conciliatory mask because Pakistan is a failed state today, & even the Islamic nations are not willing to help them. The moment they become somewhat stable they will go whole hog in their evil design of 'bleeding India through a thousand cuts'. The gentleman says that Pakistan is relevant to India because a disintegrated Pakistan with its nuclear arsenal with a highly weaponised society will be threat to India,in other words you deal with Pakistan for its nuisance value!
Instead of asking his country citizens to change the way they elect &control there military he is scaring India about the consequences of failed Pakistan. That’s the biggest problem today in Pakistan
While rogue countries on the planet negotiate with the rest of the world with their guns pointed at the latter, paxtan is the only rogue country on the planet which negotiates with the rest of the world with a gun pointed to its head.
He has narrated what Pakistan is doing since it came into existence. He is right actually but it's scary too. 220 million people who are almost confused and mixed their religion with politics and don't know what to do.
46' - 47' election result which paved the way for ppartition ------mmosslim constituency ( Bombay Province 100% vote goes to M. League , Madras Province 100% , Bengal 95% , Assam 91% , Orissa 100% , Central Province 93% ...so on so on ....) popul. xchange kyo nahi kiya .... tab akal ghass churney gayi thi...
So, A prosperous Pakistan wud simply mean more headache for India. And, the chances of Peace between Pak n India r 0% ad long as their (pak) army exists alongside radicalised people n politicians.
@@user-so9my7uh3m in order to become rich Pakistan has to become progressive pragmatic and economy oriented in thought - which should in theory make them easier to deal with, meanwhile poverty makes them more religious and violent. but history hasn't really proven out this thesis because Pakistan was able to get advantages over India historically without ever reforming themselves and ended up attacking instead
Paki naya churan bechane ki koshish kar rahe hai...."prosperou pak will help india prosperous more"........and indian left media is buying that churan.....but i am sure Modi-Shah-Jaishankar are not buying any of this crap.....tabhi to pareshaan hai ye log....
So China with unstable neighbour Pak, they grew up exponentially but for India to attain it's full economic potential we need stable Pak...what kind of logic is this
Another canard is that regions grow and not countries and so we should do saarc. But Japan grew on its own, later south korea, after that even china went alone. India is big enough to be a region on its own. I am not a fan of saarc or honestly even bimstec.
Whenever Pakistan got prosperous and got new advanced military equipments , they declared war on INDIA , so nope we know what happens when pak gets money. History repeats itself.
We must not forget how Mr modi went to Pakistan on short notice just to meet shareef big brother who became pm.Then pathankot happened and then uri happened,then pulwama happened.This gov is keen on becoming friends with Pakistan but their are some forces in Pakistan which will never let it happen.Mosad caught two Pakistani terrorists just yesterday that were coming to attack a shop in Mumbai.This gov should understand Pakistan will never change you can help them and fill their stomachs and pockets so that when they come to do another terrorist attack they shouldn't be hungry and should have a full stomach.
Nope it's not a mistake he tried to make peace and it's the only party that gives army freehand..I was saying why they want to give them business now after all they will not change or anything
46' - 47' election result which paved the way for ppartition ------mmosslim constituency ( Bombay Province 100% vote goes to M. League , Madras Province 100% , Bengal 95% , Assam 91% , Orissa 100% , Central Province 93% ...so on so on ....) prepare for another ccivil wwar ..... it is going to happen one day ..... congress didnot do popul. xchange & it was a blunder.
@@urrasscal8380 sleep well, those who got Pakistan and couldn't run the country, and today they bagging for food and medical protection and Allah can't be everywhere, even he says those who don't respect the systems should be punished and you can see that in ur payra Pakistan,
I wrote similar statement above but it was only me who was to vote against BJP but seeing your comment I will try hard to vote against whoever try to have relationship with pak. Someone said stable relationship means stable trade stable trade mean stable income for Pakistan it means stable Pakistan which means stable terrorism against India. So better no relation.
China is 18 trillion economy. Without any neighbour. Its bullshot. We dont need Pakistan We have full Asean to trade. Rich asean. Full middle east. Full Africa Noone needs Pakistan. Did China need indis or Mongolia or Korea. No
India can adapt to an ever unstable Pakistan, Indians should never be the ones who fear disintegration of Pakistan. Rather India should be the first who prepares for such an eventuality. India might help the people of Pakistan ( not the political entity of Pakistan ) only in the event of mass starvation on purely humanitarian basis. Otherwise India should not do anything out of the way extending any sort of help to Pakistan. We still remember the treacherous back stabbing behaviour of Pakistan for the last 75 years and what it has put India through for so long.
Precisely was my answer too...to cover the point of the host's apprehension about paki being dangerously highly weaponised and radicalised society...is the exact point India should not befriend pakistan and let it disintegrate into four by deviding army and people, which will do good to the people of present pakistan and the paki elites!! Also, all those who befriended pakistan has been doomed and we are progressing better after 2014 with no relationship with paki then in earlier years...pak is a cursed country and reaping fruits of its Karma!!
I just want to add that as a society Pakistan is throughly brutalized and turned inhuman as can be seen from the way Hindus and other minorities are attacked, kidnapped and killed and the way brutal treatment meted out in the name of blasphemy. India should not touch / help Pakistan.
Dream on. Pakistan will never disintegrate, god willing. Pakistan is evolving and all great nations go through this process. It’s only a matter of time before Pakistan puts its house in order.
Funny how entitled these guys feel. They shamelessly claim...that we are the trouble you need to pamper or we will he more trouble. The way we see it now...deal with it once and for all than forever.
This guy is a favourite of pakistan army and will recite the ISI script . His propaganda holds no traction in India...pakistan was created by the Brits as a sentry post for the western powers to keep an eye on Russia . Later Iran and Afghanistan became other hot spots for which the americans used pakistan . Once pakistan ceased to be of any value the americans moved on and the borrowed economic growth of pakistan collapsed like a pack of cards.
I don't know what Wajahat is talking about when he says Parvez Musharraf had "progressive" ideas about India! Musharraf was the guy who authored the Kargill misadventure and the 26/11 Mumbai terrorist attack
I think he is referring to Post Kargil Musharraf who was a different political entity than the war hawk who wanted Kashmir. He can be considered as a pioneer of trade/tourism with India policy that Bajwa implemented partially.
@@rutvikrswhat kool aid u are drinking 😂😂 Musharraf was a dishonest, venomous snake who carried out so many terrorist attacks on Indian civilians AFTER Kargil.
India should not bow down to the threat of instability of Pakistan. Almost every Pakistani thinks that suicide bomber threat will work every time, forgetting the fact that's what it's been doing for a long time and it's not going to be worse than it. If Pakistan does go under, they do have Afghanistan and Iran, their brothers.
A stable Pakistan is in everybody's interests. However, Pakistan has exploited this very fact and blackmailed the various global powers into giving them aid. But, we aren't falling for this ruse anymore.
It is said, while rogue countries on the planet negotiate with the rest of the world with their guns pointed at the latter, Pakistan is the only rogue country which negotiates with the rest of the world with a gun pointed to its head.
A stable pakistan is in nobody's interest . Ordinary Pak citizens dream of Ghazwa e Hind and hoisting Pak flag on the Red fort in Delhi . Ordinary Indians don't even think of Pakistan and neither do they want to capture Pakistan and make them Hindu . For India , current Pakistan is like a wounded snake . It has every intention to bite you but it lacks the capability . The moment it becomes healthy , it will try biting you again
Mai is baat se bilkul agree nahi karta ki 'Stable Pakistan is good for India'. Ha agar Pakistan ek normal state hota, jaise Bangladesh hai, tab ye baat sach hota. But Pakistan ek normal state nahi hai. Wo jab khud Stable hote hai, tab wo dusro ko unstable karne me apna energy and paisa lagate hai. Aur jab tak Pakistan ka ye trait khatam nahi hota, tab tak humaare liye sabse achha yahi ho ga ki , 'Pakistan ko edge' par rakhha jae. Mai ye bhi nahi chahata ki Pakistan break ho jae, kyu ki uske baad kya ho ga usme bahut uncertainty hai, bahut chaos hua to hume bhi effect ho sakta hai. Isliye Pakistan ko just extreme edge par rakhho, jisse ki uska saara energy sirf Zinda rahane me chala jae.
bangaldesh is not a normal desh jab sheik hasina jayegi tab dekhna bangaldesh ko .... 47' main sabse pehle hhindu 'o' ko marna in kangali chusllim ne start kiya tha direct action k time ...don't ever trust this kangladeshi ... they r also ddangerous..
Bro, I agree with you 100 per cent. Sadly most of us Indians are still idealistic to the point of stupidity and think that we should rescue everyone in trouble, no matter how much they resent/hate us
Let us forget and dont think of Pak and pay our attention for our betterment. You can trust a Cobra but not Pakistan. Since they are now in deep rooted problems, they talk of solving disputes, A week back one leader threatened India with Nukes. That is Pak.
11:26 If pakistan fails (...which it will) , you will have open/porus borders with Iran, afghanistan & china to welcome you with open arms, and here in India, we will have some democratic parties crying thier heart out for you at the top of thier lungs...and that's it !! You won't get a night's stay in India as far as refugee crisis is concerned. Hope we have made ourselves aptly clear, you have 55 other countries(unma mulk !!), go thrive there !
Don't worry there are no agendas with Indian government on helping them probably the trade won't even be resumed and Pakistan has nothing to leverage on India. Helping Sri Lanka was for beneficial to us but why help Pakistan, have they helped us in times of need ? All they did was declare war when we were at our weakest, they shouldn't even expect any help from India and India has a lot of issues that needs attention.
I recall Sushant Sareen-ji's tweet, "Imran Khan has left Pakistan in such shit that even the Army is not ready to take over." We just leave them there!
His argument is India should help pak because of the coming refugee crisis. I think india should militarize border in even more rather than helping pak. This HT host is br@in dead softballer
This is very right time openly support for people of Sindhu and others to divide Pak as they are doing in Kashmir . Why we should feel shy of it. Tit for Tat.
Khalistan kashmir tamil nadu kerala maratha assam telegu r u ready to divided artificial indian indeginous country ? Let me know if truth hurts n plz remove sindh from ur national anthem it again is a blunder on ur mythology existance
@@khaleelmohammadjutt4980 Bhonsdike Sindh represents the migrant sindhi hindu population who had to leave their motherland because of you katuwas and dont worry India is very strong and United no matter how hard you pakistanis try to bleed it
@@khaleelmohammadjutt4980 I’m from Tamil Nadu, we don’t want to break away from India. We may have our differences but we prefer to work as unity of states under the Indian constitution not as an independent state. The recent Keezhadi-Tamil Nadu archaeological findings have very close relations to the Harappa-Mohenjodaro (Indus valley) style of civilization. So it is not a myth. Better go get educated on facts from authentic sources rather blab out crap that you pile up from social media. 🤫🤫
@@viss6584 i have many tamilian friends bro dont tell me what u ppl r first try to learn hindi and accept central government i cant write more here and remaining if u had so called relation y did u end up in far south ? Do u see my sir name ? we were the first settlers of Indus Sindh Pakistan who migrated thousands of years from Middle east and flourished it
I think we can all agree..A stable pk means, more tension for India (azaad ksmir, blah blah) These talks are just done so, H indus or Indians in general feel guilty in order to "help pk", lets not forget, we are kuffars...So long pk! Goodbye!
@@madhuram7017 Not their Army, their Jihad networks, Mafia, Radical population, Frenzy criminals will make mass infiltration in to India if Pakistan collapses and Engage in wild West culture which even India is also not accustomed to fight Except Afghanistan, Syria, Russian Wagner group can manage and face the Frankenstein monsters.
India doesn't need pakistan. Don't spread the myth that a prosperous pakistan is required for India to progress. Pakistan actually needs to be cut down to size so that it stops being an irritant in South Asia..we would love to see a punjabistan with independent balochistan and Sindhu Desh with kpk going to Afghanistan.
The population is 250 million and growing. Sushant Sarin had said that their population centers are close to Indian border. How will we stop refugees from coming over? Moreover these will be a radicalized refugee group that can destabilize India even if 1 million manage to get in.
Refugee crisis will never happen as the west will always help them and even if it did they are more likely to go towards Afghanistan as they hate India more.
@ss0498 No the Bangladesh border can't be fenced because the area is swampy. But the Pakistan border from Jammu to Gujarat is dry and is fenced. It's even visible from space. The only problem areas is Kashmir where it's mountainous and Rann of Kutch where it's swampy
Pakistanis should worry about akhirat, hoor, gilma, sharab etc after death. That's the only purpose of life. A true momin won't worry about prosperity in this fani dunia.
But Pak Govt need to stop Terrorism for any trade possible. Also, medicine are going from India to Pak. Syed Salahuddin, Hafiz Saeed etc moving freely in Pal
15:02 That's like arguing for an abusive and violent husband, sure he beats his wife but he also takes her to the hospital if the beating was too brutal. Garbage nonsensical ridiculousness like this needs to be countered, we should negotiate for lasting peace with elected governments and not dictators.
India does not need stable pakistan but need a pakistan that is broken in 4 states. I used to laugh even years ago when certain political leaders and bollywood personalities used to make this statement that stable pakistan is India need, when they used to fund every terrorist org that acted against India. That statement used to stand against every logic and data, but they used to make the stupid statement proudly nonetheless. I hope Indian govt continues current policy against pakistan and wait and watch what happens to it. If it breaks then we negotiate with govt of Sindh and Balochistan or if it continues in current trajectory then we are good as an economic pauper pakistan cannot fund terrorists.
Pakistanis like Pervez Hoodbhoy, Syed Muzammil, Zarrar Khurro, and now Wajahat Khan don't have problems with Nehru's India or Romilla Thapar's version(s) of Ancient Indian history because it was tailored to the narrative independent India was delivered with. Pakistanis are petrified by Modi-Ji's India, because (a) it has taken India beyond their reach; (b) growing numbers of Indian Muslims have begun adjusting their lives within the mainstream; (c) better education levels among Muslim women has generated wealth for them and resulted in lower birth rates; (d) no preferential treatment is given to Muslims except in non-BJP ruled states; (e) most Pakistanis believe a Sanatani India will avenge the hate and violence they unleashed on the "Hindu" community since partition; maybe it will? Meanwhile, Zia's brand of political Islam has spawned "nafrat" and grown illiteracy that has clouded the ability of Pakistanis to see beyond their noses!
9:47 pakistan was going to be the next " Israel " was the best line meanwhile pakistani passport - this passport is valid for all counties in the world except " Israel "
When an institution like military has ruled a country for several decades and all other institutions failed to become potent then it's impossible for that country to become a democracy. Pakistan should stop aspiring for democracy and embrace military dictatorship. People will know whom to blame and other countries will know whom to talk to.
This Prithiraj Syndorme of Hindu majority India has to go do not forget what Quran says to Muslim when having upper Hand Quran 47:35 :So be not weak and ask not for PEACE (from the enemies of Islâm), while you are having the UPPER HAND . God is with you, and will never decrease the reward of your good deeds.
There are plenty of evil quotes too in the Quran and Hadiths. Here's a list of them: 1. Hadith on Apostasy Hadith: “Whoever changes his religion, kill him.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, 9:84:57) 2. Hadith on Women Hadith: “I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you [women]. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, 1:6:301) 3. Hadith on Child Marriage Hadith: Aisha reported that the Prophet Muhammad married her when she was six years old and consummated the marriage when she was nine. (Sahih al-Bukhari, 7:62:64) 4. Hadith on Beating Wives Hadith: The Prophet is reported to have said, “A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.” (Sunan Abi Dawood, 11:2142) As for women of whom you fear rebellion, convince them, and leave them apart in beds, and beat them. Then, if they obey you, do not seek a way against them. (Surah Nisa Quran 4:34) 5. Hadith on Jews Hadith: “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say, ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.’” (Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:177) 📚 Book 📖#4, Chapter 52, Verse 177 Sahih Bukhari 4:54:524: Content: Discusses Jews being cursed and transformed into rats. How is this in format? Sahih Bukhari 4138: This Hadith also discusses the permissibility of sexual relations with slave women, emphasizing that such relations were permissible after ensuring the women were not pregnant. Sahih Muslim 3432: This Hadith discusses the permissibility of having sexual relations with women captured in war. It states that during the Battle of Hunayn, the Prophet Muhammad allowed his companions to have relations with female captives after ensuring they were not pregnant. Surah Al-Tawbah (9:29): Chapter 9 Verse 29 Content: "Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day..." Surah Al-Ma'idah (5:33): Chapter 5 Verse 33 Content: "Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified..." Surah At-Taubah (9:5): Content: "Then, when the sacred months have passed, kill the polytheists wherever you find them..." Sahih Bukhari 8:82:794: Book 8, Chapter 82, Verse 794 Content: Punishment for those who commit sodomy is death! Context: This is often cited in discussions about LGBTQ+ rights. Sahih Muslim 4366: Content: punishment for theft is cutting of hands and feet, usually on the opposite sides of the body. Sahih Bukhari 9:84:57: Book 9, Chapter 84, Verse 57 Content: "Whoever changes his Islamic religion, then kill him." Mohammed Married his daughter in Law Zainab. “Zaynab was in her chamber, undressed, and admiration for her entered the heart of the Prophet” “Then on one occasion he the Prophet caught sight of her and felt love for her” “believing woman if she gives herself to the Prophet [and] if the Prophet wishes to marry her” Racist translations of verse 106 SAHIH INTERNATIONAL On the Day [some] faces will turn white and [some] faces will turn black. As for those whose faces turn black, [to them it will be said], "Did you disbelieve after your belief? Then taste the punishment for what you used to reject." Sahih al-Bukhari 7039 $ Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Umar: concerning the dream of the Prophet (s) in Medina: The Prophet😢 said, "| saw (in a dream) a black woman with unkept hair going out of Medina and settling at Mahai'a. I interpreted that as (a symbol of) the epidemic of Medina Female sex slaves: Sunan an-Nasa'i 3959 It was narrated from Anas, that he Messenger of Allah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but 'Aishah and Hafsah would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him. Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, revealed: "O Prophet! Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to you.' until the end of the Verse. Sahih al-Bukhari 5686 Narrated Anas: The climate of Medina did not suit some people, so the Prophet ordered them follow his shepherd, i.e. his camels, and drink their milk and urine (as a medicine). Sahih al-Bukhari "The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number."
India has so many internal issues to take care of, like unemployment, illiteracy, skill development, and infrastructure development ( that's the only area where the government is working effectively compared to other areas) inflation & many others. So, rather than focusing on dead horse , India should focus solely on its own development. Apart from that , as the national security state of pakistan, India can never trust pakistan as they have attacked 4 freaking times 1948, 1965, 1971, & 1999 and a series of terror attacks. So it's a large trust deficit , which is not easy to fill until they gain some sort of democracy instead of the current hybrid regime of pak establishment.
Thanks for making some sense. As an Indian, I didn't like the comment section filled by other fellow Indians. You can't upgrade by pulling others down. When I am proud of my country's progress, I don't think aiming for Pakistan's destruction is an Indian thing to do.
I rely on my government, and i trust them. So i believe there will be no issue whatever the government or diplomats would think right for India. See, we are commoners, we see Pakistan a enemy and we have the right to think so. But ultimately the policymakers should make the decision, and we will support the government.
They will never change mosad just yesterday caught 2 Pakistani terrorists that were coming to attack a shop in Mumbai so why we are talking about this delusional issue .They need to stop terrorism in their country first
He is educated articulate guy. Also he shared that failed Pakistan will be liability for India. We indians n our Government had Plan B to handle failed Pakistan. Already we resolved by making Bangladesh. Next time, it will be divided by 5 countries. Stable and developed Pakistan is more dangerous than instable Pakistan. Jai hind
Let Muhammad Ali Jinnah wake up from Grave and help Pakistan. Its not India's problem. We have no relation with them since they decided to part ways and form seaprate country in 1947. If they want to break up into 5 states and dissolve Nation of Pakistan and re-integrate with India, Only then we will consider any help.
Pakistan is disintegrating. India should allow this process to continue until the Pakistani people start demanding union with India. Only then should India help the Pakistanis.
India should send multiple tons of grass to Pakistan. Because their leader said during the 70's that Pakistani will eat grass if food is not available.
There is no reason to interview the guy from the other side. No need to help them. Let them stay where they are. Let them be unstable or otherwise, we are well prepared to deal with them. Let them not give crap and bull stories. No one will buy them, let alone India under our Honourable Modi Ji. The 3 reasons thst he mentioned are all their own doing. They are in their last leg. Let them dissolve into oblivion for good. Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
This gentleman should talk to Pakistan military establishment before he speaks to any Indian.He carries a chip on his shoulder and staying in US is not interested in the Indian subcontinent.he is glorifying the role played by Mr . Musharraf and tries to intimidate. Madam you have wasted your time.
I strongly disagree with your view that prosperous Pakistan would be helpful to India. Contrary, prosperous Pakistan is dangerous for India in terms of arrogancy of Pakistan at international forums, security at the borders, exploiting the situation geographically, etc... Current scenario is really helped India in checking situation at borders east and west of Pakistan, handling of situation in Afghanistan, Chinese interference, etc etc.. globally Pakistan is completely isolated...
Habit never dies. Mindset never changes. India will be a fool of galactical magnitude if it helps Pakistan. Whatever the western analyst has to say India should let Pakistan disintegrate. It is in our interest. Let it break abd fight amoung themselves.
Bachpan se jhooth aur nafrat, jihadmpadhaya gaya hai, to Pakistanion se aur kya ummeed kar sakte hain....issliye Bharat ka koi bhi interest naheen hai Pakistan ke saath koi bhi relation rakhne ka. Jab pehle thaa yo Pakistan ne uski ehmiyat samjhi naheen aur MFN status de rakha thaa Infia ne to bahut zyada sasti rate psr India se samaan jaa raha thaa. Pakistan tab kua karta thaa??? Pakistan ne jung musallat kari, aur Dehshatgardi karke hamare.masoom logon ko maarta raha. Khalistanion ko help karta hai aur weaponize karta hai. BHART KYON AISE MULK KO HELP KAREGA?????????????? We as Indians do not want India to help a terrorist nation and no relationship should be resumed at all. Pakistan is destroying itself due to it's own deeds. The basic foundation of all Pakistanis is based on LIES, HATRED FOR OTHERS, & JIHAD. What do you think why your people are suffering??? Pakistan is suffering due to it's mindset. Pakistanis do not want to know the facts.
I want the stuff this guy is high on ' Stable Pakistan is good for India". Really? Historically a stable Pakistan is a constant nuance. Pakistan elite's Hindu/India hatred is which stops them from any cordial relations. Remember pre Modi era? We were kind of habitual of hearing news of bomb blasts continuously on different Indian cities. It is only in last few year instability in that Islamist country we are safe from Jihadist activities.
A stable Pakistan will create more 26/11 in India Bharat ki gaddi pe modi hai Sunahai Pakistan government Twitter account block hogaya Ab to Elon musk bhi RSS wala nikla Maza aaraha hai ? 🇮🇳💪
You have fallen for the lie that Pakistan tells the world, ie, solve the Kashmir issue and everything will be fine. In fact, at a deeper level, this is an ideological dispute between two civilizations which began when the Muslims first attacked India and the Pakistani State is now taken over the same role. Pakistan has a visceral hatred for everything that India stands for, just as the Arab States have towards Israel. So, the end result that Pakistan wants is the destruction of India, not the settling of the Kashmir dispute
Kashmir issue will never gonna settle as it is the only way Pakistan army gets funds from Western world, Muslim ummah and leverage in their country. Kashmir issue settling is Same like NATO accepting Russia in to their block.
Kashmir will get resolved once Pakistan stops obsessing about it. Once Pakistan stops being India's enemy there is nothing to prevent an EU like structure with freedom of movement. Once that happens nobody really cares where the official border is.
A stable Pakistan means the establishment needs a carrot to control the crowd which means re-upping the militancy on Kashmir. Never fall into these 'moderate' traps.
very true words👉
We have learnt our lessons, lets jus hope our establishment doesnt take this poison coated bait
Keep exposing him
True why does the Indian anchor even bother to invite these Pakistanis on the podcast cant the anchor reply to the paki guy when he says trade the pakis have no money to pay india why shall we trade with them and why shall india bail Pakistan out for them to create more problems in Kashmir and create more unrest for us
so true an unstable Pakistan works in our favor don't know why this Indian anchor could not reply back to this pakistani guy
The argument that a destabilised Pak is not good for India doesnt hold any water in my opinion. In their better days, their focus was to bleed India through a thousand cuts, lets not forget. Due to their current economic situation, they are unable to focus their ill intent towards us, also being targeted by their other neighbour Afhanistan.
They still not have given any credible assurance to the world how they will rise from their mess, in summary, India should watch closely from the side lines and see how the situation pans out .
While Wajahat admits Pak needs India currently, the situation would have been totally different had they been in a better economic state, he would have been much more hostile even on the interview than the conciliatory mask he has to reluctantly put on now. Everything boils down to Economic prowess!
agreed. majority pkstnis are jahil & extremist(offensive in the sense & full of hatred). see those street interviews in joke pkstn. Basically they are greedy( lalchi) in nature.
Very well put and it is the TRUTH
That's a keen observation sir, when you say that Wajahat is reluctantly putting on a conciliatory mask because Pakistan is a failed state today, & even the Islamic nations are not willing to help them. The moment they become somewhat stable they will go whole hog in their evil design of 'bleeding India through a thousand cuts'.
The gentleman says that Pakistan is relevant to India because a disintegrated Pakistan with its nuclear arsenal with a highly weaponised society will be threat to India,in other words you deal with Pakistan for its nuisance value!
@@rajivdevdas5318 well said..👍👍
Absolute truth told in plain terms.
Stable Pakistan means more stability for cross border terrorist. Osama had a very stable shelter in Pakistan.
✅✅
true👉
Good keep exposing him
Unstable and failed Pakistan will inflict severe damage and bleed India heavily.
Instead of threatening to be a suicide bomb, Pakistan must concentrate on ruthlessly introspecting and radically reimagining itself.
Instead of asking his country citizens to change the way they elect &control there military he is scaring India about the consequences of failed Pakistan. That’s the biggest problem today in Pakistan
Absolutely, this is the devious mind of these people.
While rogue countries on the planet negotiate with the rest of the world with their guns pointed at the latter, paxtan is the only rogue country on the planet which negotiates with the rest of the world with a gun pointed to its head.
This is a typical muslim response to a prosperous kafir in the neighbourhood.
the main problem of paapistan is iislamb...
He has narrated what Pakistan is doing since it came into existence. He is right actually but it's scary too. 220 million people who are almost confused and mixed their religion with politics and don't know what to do.
We helped turkey and look what they did? Just secure the borders and improve the fencing of the border area. No help for pakistan, no way.
With automatic guns
46' - 47' election result which paved the way for ppartition ------mmosslim constituency ( Bombay Province 100% vote goes to M. League , Madras Province 100% , Bengal 95% , Assam 91% , Orissa 100% , Central Province 93% ...so on so on ....) popul. xchange kyo nahi kiya .... tab akal ghass churney gayi thi...
@@urrasscal8380 yes brother these fyck bloody indian chuslim voted for creating of pakistan and they were not go that time
L pe Char su 😂 Help 😂
So, A prosperous Pakistan wud simply mean more headache for India. And, the chances of Peace between Pak n India r 0% ad long as their (pak) army exists alongside radicalised people n politicians.
How ?
How would a prosperous Pakistan help India , is one thing I have never understood
@@user-so9my7uh3m in order to become rich Pakistan has to become progressive pragmatic and economy oriented in thought - which should in theory make them easier to deal with, meanwhile poverty makes them more religious and violent. but history hasn't really proven out this thesis because Pakistan was able to get advantages over India historically without ever reforming themselves and ended up attacking instead
@@echosmith5256 thank you for explaining 😊👍🏻
Paki naya churan bechane ki koshish kar rahe hai...."prosperou pak will help india prosperous more"........and indian left media is buying that churan.....but i am sure Modi-Shah-Jaishankar are not buying any of this crap.....tabhi to pareshaan hai ye log....
Pakistan is never gonna prosper
So China with unstable neighbour Pak, they grew up exponentially but for India to attain it's full economic potential we need stable Pak...what kind of logic is this
Pakistani logic. What did you expect? 😂
Thats like open threat .. if you don't give alms to pakistan then maybe they will create problems for india 😂
Another canard is that regions grow and not countries and so we should do saarc. But Japan grew on its own, later south korea, after that even china went alone. India is big enough to be a region on its own. I am not a fan of saarc or honestly even bimstec.
Saarc / bimstec countries will just re export chinese stuff to india under masked names
joke pkstn. Basically they are greedy in nature. logic naam ke koi cheez hi nehi hai inme. see those street interviews in joke pkstn.
NOW INDIA MUST FOCUS ON CHANGING THE WORLD MAP AGAIN AS WE DID IN 1971 PAKISTAN SHOULD BE SPLIT IN 3 DIFFERENT COUNTRIES.
We don't want any part of Pakistan to reunite with India.... Unless we only get the land without any Mleccha momin!
Kuch bhi Karo, lekin please India mein mat mila dena
@@vsukhani except PoJK. That is our territory and carries significant geopolitical value
@@vsukhani India Nahi Bhai...mitti mein Mila denge😁
@@vsukhani SARE COUNTRIES ALAG ALAG HONGE JINKE INDIA KE SATH TERMS ACCHE HONGE
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 must never help the 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰 who always try to destroy🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 by joining hands with 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
@@Lifegoeson98-z6x 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰 must lick master 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳 boots more for money these days with no shame right . 🇨🇳 🐶🇵🇰 ✌
@@Lifegoeson98-z6x 🇵🇰🇵🇰 sending weapons to 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 and 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰 is on the Russia radar which announce 🇵🇰🇵🇰 as an enemy in future
@@Lifegoeson98-z6x I think most of them will now be located in Pakistan 😂😂😂
@@Lifegoeson98-z6x those 220 million beggars earn less than our 150 million beggars 😂😂😂
@@Lifegoeson98-z6x oh … there are call centres also in Pakistan
I thought there were only terrorism centres there
Pakistani millitary ordered 679 VT tanks despite economic crises. Why should India save them .
Whenever Pakistan got prosperous and got new advanced military equipments , they declared war on INDIA , so nope we know what happens when pak gets money. History repeats itself.
yes, disintigation of pak is only solution for long term india stability
A landlocked panjab should be left for pak
We must not forget how Mr modi went to Pakistan on short notice just to meet shareef big brother who became pm.Then pathankot happened and then uri happened,then pulwama happened.This gov is keen on becoming friends with Pakistan but their are some forces in Pakistan which will never let it happen.Mosad caught two Pakistani terrorists just yesterday that were coming to attack a shop in Mumbai.This gov should understand Pakistan will never change you can help them and fill their stomachs and pockets so that when they come to do another terrorist attack they shouldn't be hungry and should have a full stomach.
Were those 2 Pakistanis and 1 Iranian going to attack Israel or India? Clarifying cos some of the reports suggested Israel
Big mistakes from modi side's to even to go Pakistan,
I would even talk to any Pakistan.
Nope it's not a mistake he tried to make peace and it's the only party that gives army freehand..I was saying why they want to give them business now after all they will not change or anything
46' - 47' election result which paved the way for ppartition ------mmosslim constituency ( Bombay Province 100% vote goes to M. League , Madras Province 100% , Bengal 95% , Assam 91% , Orissa 100% , Central Province 93% ...so on so on ....) prepare for another ccivil wwar ..... it is going to happen one day ..... congress didnot do popul. xchange & it was a blunder.
@@urrasscal8380 sleep well, those who got Pakistan and couldn't run the country, and today they bagging for food and medical protection and Allah can't be everywhere, even he says those who don't respect the systems should be punished and you can see that in ur payra Pakistan,
If Modi gives even 1 rupee help to Pakistan then my while village of 4,000 people will vote for NOTA
I wrote similar statement above but it was only me who was to vote against BJP but seeing your comment I will try hard to vote against whoever try to have relationship with pak. Someone said stable relationship means stable trade stable trade mean stable income for Pakistan it means stable Pakistan which means stable terrorism against India. So better no relation.
@Ganesh Bagde None of the Above
Itni navrat kyu bhia. Log Pakistan ke thik h lekin sarkar or govt mc h waha ki
China is 18 trillion economy. Without any neighbour. Its bullshot. We dont need Pakistan
We have full Asean to trade. Rich asean. Full middle east. Full Africa
Noone needs Pakistan. Did China need indis or Mongolia or Korea. No
India can adapt to an ever unstable Pakistan, Indians should never be the ones who fear disintegration of Pakistan.
Rather India should be the first who prepares for such an eventuality.
India might help the people of Pakistan ( not the political entity of Pakistan ) only in the event of mass starvation on purely humanitarian basis.
Otherwise India should not do anything out of the way extending any sort of help to Pakistan. We still remember the treacherous back stabbing behaviour of Pakistan for the last 75 years and what it has put India through for so long.
Indians esp Hindus have this 'Mother India complex'. We should never disturb a self destructing enemy Islamic nation.
Precisely was my answer too...to cover the point of the host's apprehension about paki being dangerously highly weaponised and radicalised society...is the exact point India should not befriend pakistan and let it disintegrate into four by deviding army and people, which will do good to the people of present pakistan and the paki elites!! Also, all those who befriended pakistan has been doomed and we are progressing better after 2014 with no relationship with paki then in earlier years...pak is a cursed country and reaping fruits of its Karma!!
I just want to add that as a society Pakistan is throughly brutalized and turned inhuman as can be seen from the way Hindus and other minorities are attacked, kidnapped and killed and the way brutal treatment meted out in the name of blasphemy. India should not touch / help Pakistan.
Let them starve instead help the starving people of India they have a better chance of helping the nation
Dream on. Pakistan will never disintegrate, god willing. Pakistan is evolving and all great nations go through this process. It’s only a matter of time before Pakistan puts its house in order.
Funny how entitled these guys feel. They shamelessly claim...that we are the trouble you need to pamper or we will he more trouble.
The way we see it now...deal with it once and for all than forever.
Exactly that self entitlement
@@mylord3003 Self entitlement and pomposity based upon delusions of self grandeur.
No mercy until they are finished
Exactly....
This guy is a favourite of pakistan army and will recite the ISI script . His propaganda holds no traction in India...pakistan was created by the Brits as a sentry post for the western powers to keep an eye on Russia . Later Iran and Afghanistan became other hot spots for which the americans used pakistan . Once pakistan ceased to be of any value the americans moved on and the borrowed economic growth of pakistan collapsed like a pack of cards.
Ponkaaaaaa
Don’t worry wajahat, we are not only prepared for Pakistan to be a failed state, we are looking forward for it.
I don't know what Wajahat is talking about when he says Parvez Musharraf had "progressive" ideas about India! Musharraf was the guy who authored the Kargill misadventure and the 26/11 Mumbai terrorist attack
I think he is referring to Post Kargil Musharraf who was a different political entity than the war hawk who wanted Kashmir. He can be considered as a pioneer of trade/tourism with India policy that Bajwa implemented partially.
@@rutvikrswhat kool aid u are drinking 😂😂 Musharraf was a dishonest, venomous snake who carried out so many terrorist attacks on Indian civilians AFTER Kargil.
India should not bow down to the threat of instability of Pakistan.
Almost every Pakistani thinks that suicide bomber threat will work every time, forgetting the fact that's what it's been doing for a long time and it's not going to be worse than it. If Pakistan does go under, they do have Afghanistan and Iran, their brothers.
This Pakistani analyst is off his rockers. Hindustan Times please invite people who are in touch with reality. RIP Pakistan
Pakistan should re connect with its civilizational identity discard Islam
Then only they can join India
Wajahat is a true Mohabbe Watan and true Momeen hard stuck with his Izlamic goals
It's called Taqqiya. Google it.
Delusional in chief
A true paxtani punjabi who vehemently believes in the tried and failed two-nation theory.
And a product/asset of Pak military
@@jasha9sandhu so full of himself and his glib tounge and his bull
India is never going to forgive nor forget Mumbai terror attack
Congress PM Mr Singh already forgiven, we the people will not.
Wajahat is saying take care of me else we will blast nuke😂😂😂
kar de blast
just like TLP ideology. Afghanistan like situation is gaining ground in joke pkstn.
@@Tutanchat one hand kkurand & other nnuke puke.
A stable Pakistan is in everybody's interests. However, Pakistan has exploited this very fact and blackmailed the various global powers into giving them aid. But, we aren't falling for this ruse anymore.
It is said, while rogue countries on the planet negotiate with the rest of the world with their guns pointed at the latter, Pakistan is the only rogue country which negotiates with the rest of the world with a gun pointed to its head.
A stable pakistan is in nobody's interest . Ordinary Pak citizens dream of Ghazwa e Hind and hoisting Pak flag on the Red fort in Delhi . Ordinary Indians don't even think of Pakistan and neither do they want to capture Pakistan and make them Hindu . For India , current Pakistan is like a wounded snake . It has every intention to bite you but it lacks the capability . The moment it becomes healthy , it will try biting you again
What the hell are you saying? A stable Pakistan is never in India's interest.
Wahajat is threatening us in a polite way
Such people are called Sophisticated crooks !
Same is done by their intellectuals like Nisar and Hoodboy
Mai is baat se bilkul agree nahi karta ki 'Stable Pakistan is good for India'.
Ha agar Pakistan ek normal state hota, jaise Bangladesh hai, tab ye baat sach hota.
But Pakistan ek normal state nahi hai.
Wo jab khud Stable hote hai, tab wo dusro ko unstable karne me apna energy and paisa lagate hai.
Aur jab tak Pakistan ka ye trait khatam nahi hota, tab tak humaare liye sabse achha yahi ho ga ki , 'Pakistan ko edge' par rakhha jae.
Mai ye bhi nahi chahata ki Pakistan break ho jae, kyu ki uske baad kya ho ga usme bahut uncertainty hai, bahut chaos hua to hume bhi effect ho sakta hai.
Isliye Pakistan ko just extreme edge par rakhho, jisse ki uska saara energy sirf Zinda rahane me chala jae.
sehi
Infact we used to think that way only. But pakistan got more emboldened with stability and flirted with more adventurism against india
correct. let pak continue with its economic struggle as long as possible
As Ajit would say, “Pakistan ko liquid oxygen mei dal do. Liquid usay jeena nahin dega. Oxygen usay marney nahin dega”
bangaldesh is not a normal desh jab sheik hasina jayegi tab dekhna bangaldesh ko .... 47' main sabse pehle hhindu 'o' ko marna in kangali chusllim ne start kiya tha direct action k time ...don't ever trust this kangladeshi ... they r also ddangerous..
*All Neighbors of India are Actively/Passively Hostile. Must not forget*
Bro, I agree with you 100 per cent. Sadly most of us Indians are still idealistic to the point of stupidity and think that we should rescue everyone in trouble, no matter how much they resent/hate us
Let us forget and dont think of Pak and pay our attention for our betterment. You can trust a Cobra but not Pakistan. Since they are now in deep rooted problems, they talk of solving disputes, A week back one leader threatened India with Nukes. That is Pak.
That's all they can do
Now these guys are begging sophisticatedly!!😂😂😂
11:26 If pakistan fails (...which it will) , you will have open/porus borders with Iran, afghanistan & china to welcome you with open arms, and here in India, we will have some democratic parties crying thier heart out for you at the top of thier lungs...and that's it !!
You won't get a night's stay in India as far as refugee crisis is concerned. Hope we have made ourselves aptly clear, you have 55 other countries(unma mulk !!), go thrive there !
Umma is for show when there is problems they will come to AMMA (INDIA)
So a failed paxtaan is dangerous so give them money is wot the discussion is all abt.
Don't worry there are no agendas with Indian government on helping them probably the trade won't even be resumed and Pakistan has nothing to leverage on India. Helping Sri Lanka was for beneficial to us but why help Pakistan, have they helped us in times of need ? All they did was declare war when we were at our weakest, they shouldn't even expect any help from India and India has a lot of issues that needs attention.
@@ss0498 👌🙏
give me money otherwise i will k$$l myself ....
Madarsachap discussion standards 😂
Why should we help Pak? Its akin to feeding milk to snake.
yes, broken pakistan is better than failing pakistan.
the only things which is benificial for india is disintrigation of pakistan, no need to help pakistan.
I recall Sushant Sareen-ji's tweet, "Imran Khan has left Pakistan in such shit that even the Army is not ready to take over." We just leave them there!
"Stable Pakistan is well for India" Joke of the century. 🤣🤣
Even helping Bhutan looks futile
All Neighbors of Ind are Passively Active Hostile
His argument is India should help pak because of the coming refugee crisis.
I think india should militarize border in even more rather than helping pak.
This HT host is br@in dead softballer
Pakistan should vacate our land and move towards Mecca madina (Saudi Arabia) .
Yeah. Correct. Pakistani trainers in India just blasted on Ram Navmi in Aurangabad. Just few hours ago
This is very right time openly support for people of Sindhu and others to divide Pak as they are doing in Kashmir . Why we should feel shy of it. Tit for Tat.
Khalistan kashmir tamil nadu kerala maratha assam telegu r u ready to divided artificial indian indeginous country ? Let me know if truth hurts n plz remove sindh from ur national anthem it again is a blunder on ur mythology existance
@@khaleelmohammadjutt4980 Bhonsdike Sindh represents the migrant sindhi hindu population who had to leave their motherland because of you katuwas and dont worry India is very strong and United no matter how hard you pakistanis try to bleed it
@@khaleelmohammadjutt4980 I’m from Tamil Nadu, we don’t want to break away from India. We may have our differences but we prefer to work as unity of states under the Indian constitution not as an independent state. The recent Keezhadi-Tamil Nadu archaeological findings have very close relations to the Harappa-Mohenjodaro (Indus valley) style of civilization. So it is not a myth. Better go get educated on facts from authentic sources rather blab out crap that you pile up from social media. 🤫🤫
agreed. we should👉
@@viss6584 i have many tamilian friends bro dont tell me what u ppl r first try to learn hindi and accept central government i cant write more here and remaining if u had so called relation y did u end up in far south ? Do u see my sir name ? we were the first settlers of Indus Sindh Pakistan who migrated thousands of years from Middle east and flourished it
Sums up wajahat alis mindset: Gan& fate to fate par nawabi na ghate 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Self entitlement and pomposity based upon delusions of self grandeur.
I think we can all agree..A stable pk means, more tension for India (azaad ksmir, blah blah) These talks are just done so, H indus or Indians in general feel guilty in order to "help pk", lets not forget, we are kuffars...So long pk! Goodbye!
Is he trying to threaten India..or is he asking for help from India..
Threatening India.
@@MitchellSantner1 by begging..😅😅
@@madhuram7017 No Threatening India with dire consequences, if India don't oblige to Pakistan demands and requirements.
@@MitchellSantner1 bro that's ain't going to happen they are in position to do it...
@@madhuram7017 Not their Army, their Jihad networks, Mafia, Radical population, Frenzy criminals will make mass infiltration in to India if Pakistan collapses and Engage in wild West culture which even India is also not accustomed to fight Except Afghanistan, Syria, Russian Wagner group can manage and face the Frankenstein monsters.
Pak failed in 71 also .. a new nation was created. India needs to create new nation's from pak in future.
4th law of newton : This law states that the logic and Pakistani is inversely proportional to each other.
Let overseas Pakistanis take care !!
Looks like Afghanistan under Taliban would get stabilised and prosper before Pakistan does.
This was a useless podcast since we will never support those who will just shoot us
India doesn't need pakistan. Don't spread the myth that a prosperous pakistan is required for India to progress. Pakistan actually needs to be cut down to size so that it stops being an irritant in South Asia..we would love to see a punjabistan with independent balochistan and Sindhu Desh with kpk going to Afghanistan.
The population is 250 million and growing. Sushant Sarin had said that their population centers are close to Indian border. How will we stop refugees from coming over? Moreover these will be a radicalized refugee group that can destabilize India even if 1 million manage to get in.
Refugee crisis will never happen as the west will always help them and even if it did they are more likely to go towards Afghanistan as they hate India more.
It is worrisome
During 71 refugees were 10 million
@@harshsaini9898It's because the borders were kept open by the government at that time, thank god now they are firmly shut.
@ss0498 No the Bangladesh border can't be fenced because the area is swampy. But the Pakistan border from Jammu to Gujarat is dry and is fenced. It's even visible from space. The only problem areas is Kashmir where it's mountainous and Rann of Kutch where it's swampy
and about the nuclear threat...IMF and IAEA will denuclearise these beggars
Hindustan Time's is also acting against hindus in some Case's
Some...?? Many
don't help I repeat don't help. see those street interviews of joke pkstn. don't forget our crying & sacrifices. jai hind jai Bharat🇮🇳
Pakistanis should worry about akhirat, hoor, gilma, sharab etc after death. That's the only purpose of life. A true momin won't worry about prosperity in this fani dunia.
But Pak Govt need to stop Terrorism for any trade possible. Also, medicine are going from India to Pak. Syed Salahuddin, Hafiz Saeed etc moving freely in Pal
15:02 That's like arguing for an abusive and violent husband, sure he beats his wife but he also takes her to the hospital if the beating was too brutal. Garbage nonsensical ridiculousness like this needs to be countered, we should negotiate for lasting peace with elected governments and not dictators.
India does not need stable pakistan but need a pakistan that is broken in 4 states. I used to laugh even years ago when certain political leaders and bollywood personalities used to make this statement that stable pakistan is India need, when they used to fund every terrorist org that acted against India. That statement used to stand against every logic and data, but they used to make the stupid statement proudly nonetheless. I hope Indian govt continues current policy against pakistan and wait and watch what happens to it. If it breaks then we negotiate with govt of Sindh and Balochistan or if it continues in current trajectory then we are good as an economic pauper pakistan cannot fund terrorists.
Don't disturb your enemy when he is commiting mistake
Handover POK, baluchistan.....then we think trade,economy......
Only POK. We don't have it in us to deal with a demographic change.
And above all.. the nukes
Pakistan can try, but what's the benefit for India in establishing trade ties with Porkistan?
Pakistanis like Pervez Hoodbhoy, Syed Muzammil, Zarrar Khurro, and now Wajahat Khan don't have problems with Nehru's India or Romilla Thapar's version(s) of Ancient Indian history because it was tailored to the narrative independent India was delivered with. Pakistanis are petrified by Modi-Ji's India, because (a) it has taken India beyond their reach; (b) growing numbers of Indian Muslims have begun adjusting their lives within the mainstream; (c) better education levels among Muslim women has generated wealth for them and resulted in lower birth rates; (d) no preferential treatment is given to Muslims except in non-BJP ruled states; (e) most Pakistanis believe a Sanatani India will avenge the hate and violence they unleashed on the "Hindu" community since partition; maybe it will? Meanwhile, Zia's brand of political Islam has spawned "nafrat" and grown illiteracy that has clouded the ability of Pakistanis to see beyond their noses!
We dont want to help
" Kale Arbi"..
In short he is saying save us otherwise more terrorists will come .
9:47 pakistan was going to be the next " Israel " was the best line
meanwhile pakistani passport - this passport is valid for all counties in the world except " Israel "
Israel ka i bhi nehi ban sakta hai 😂😂 with there mazabi knowledge
When an institution like military has ruled a country for several decades and all other institutions failed to become potent then it's impossible for that country to become a democracy. Pakistan should stop aspiring for democracy and embrace military dictatorship. People will know whom to blame and other countries will know whom to talk to.
This Prithiraj Syndorme of Hindu majority India has to go do not forget what Quran says to Muslim when having upper Hand
Quran 47:35 :So be not weak and ask not for PEACE (from the enemies of Islâm), while you are having the UPPER HAND . God is with you, and will never decrease the reward of your good deeds.
There are plenty of evil quotes too in the Quran and Hadiths. Here's a list of them:
1. Hadith on Apostasy
Hadith: “Whoever changes his religion, kill him.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, 9:84:57)
2. Hadith on Women
Hadith: “I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you [women]. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, 1:6:301)
3. Hadith on Child Marriage
Hadith: Aisha reported that the Prophet Muhammad married her when she was six years old and consummated the marriage when she was nine. (Sahih al-Bukhari, 7:62:64)
4. Hadith on Beating Wives
Hadith: The Prophet is reported to have said, “A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.” (Sunan Abi Dawood, 11:2142)
As for women of whom you fear rebellion, convince them, and leave them apart in beds, and beat them. Then, if they obey you, do not seek a way against them. (Surah Nisa Quran 4:34)
5. Hadith on Jews
Hadith: “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say, ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.’” (Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:177) 📚 Book 📖#4, Chapter 52, Verse 177
Sahih Bukhari 4:54:524:
Content: Discusses Jews being cursed and transformed into rats.
How is this in format?
Sahih Bukhari 4138: This Hadith also discusses the permissibility of sexual relations with slave women, emphasizing that such relations were permissible after ensuring the women were not pregnant.
Sahih Muslim 3432: This Hadith discusses the permissibility of having sexual relations with women captured in war. It states that during the Battle of Hunayn, the Prophet Muhammad allowed his companions to have relations with female captives after ensuring they were not pregnant.
Surah Al-Tawbah (9:29): Chapter 9 Verse 29
Content: "Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day..."
Surah Al-Ma'idah (5:33): Chapter 5 Verse 33
Content: "Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified..."
Surah At-Taubah (9:5):
Content: "Then, when the sacred months have passed, kill the polytheists wherever you find them..."
Sahih Bukhari 8:82:794: Book 8, Chapter 82, Verse 794
Content: Punishment for those who commit sodomy is death!
Context: This is often cited in discussions about LGBTQ+ rights.
Sahih Muslim 4366:
Content: punishment for theft is cutting of hands and feet, usually on the opposite sides of the body.
Sahih Bukhari 9:84:57: Book 9, Chapter 84, Verse 57
Content: "Whoever changes his Islamic religion, then kill him."
Mohammed Married his daughter in Law Zainab.
“Zaynab was in her chamber, undressed, and admiration for her entered the heart of the Prophet”
“Then on one occasion he the Prophet caught sight of her and felt love for her”
“believing woman if she gives herself to the Prophet [and] if the Prophet wishes to marry her”
Racist
translations of verse 106
SAHIH INTERNATIONAL
On the Day [some] faces will turn white and [some] faces will turn black. As for those whose faces turn black, [to them it will be said], "Did you disbelieve after your belief? Then taste the punishment for what you used to reject."
Sahih al-Bukhari 7039
$ Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Umar:
concerning the dream of the Prophet (s) in Medina:
The Prophet😢 said, "| saw (in a dream) a black woman with unkept hair going out of Medina and settling at Mahai'a. I interpreted that as (a symbol of) the epidemic of Medina
Female sex slaves:
Sunan an-Nasa'i 3959
It was narrated from Anas, that he Messenger of Allah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but 'Aishah and Hafsah would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him.
Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, revealed:
"O Prophet! Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to you.' until the end of the Verse.
Sahih al-Bukhari 5686
Narrated Anas:
The climate of Medina did not suit some people, so the Prophet ordered
them follow his shepherd, i.e. his camels, and drink their milk and urine (as a medicine).
Sahih al-Bukhari
"The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number."
Terrorism is a good deed 😂 , now you are literally defaming your own holy book 😂, EDUCATE yourself
India has so many internal issues to take care of, like unemployment, illiteracy, skill development, and infrastructure development ( that's the only area where the government is working effectively compared to other areas) inflation & many others. So, rather than focusing on dead horse , India should focus solely on its own development. Apart from that , as the national security state of pakistan, India can never trust pakistan as they have attacked 4 freaking times 1948, 1965, 1971, & 1999 and a series of terror attacks. So it's a large trust deficit , which is not easy to fill until they gain some sort of democracy instead of the current hybrid regime of pak establishment.
Thanks for making some sense. As an Indian, I didn't like the comment section filled by other fellow Indians. You can't upgrade by pulling others down. When I am proud of my country's progress, I don't think aiming for Pakistan's destruction is an Indian thing to do.
Helping pakistan will be like feeding milk to snake.
Pakistan did fundamental mistakes in every step of their governance. In these many years, name a thing which was done correctly.
I rely on my government, and i trust them. So i believe there will be no issue whatever the government or diplomats would think right for India. See, we are commoners, we see Pakistan a enemy and we have the right to think so. But ultimately the policymakers should make the decision, and we will support the government.
You have right to think
Islam is symbol of adhram and Ram ji gave example how to our adhrami neighbour Ravan
Firstly pakistan is pain in the ass for us, secondly refugee crises won't happen in the border cos of vry tight border
They will never change mosad just yesterday caught 2 Pakistani terrorists that were coming to attack a shop in Mumbai so why we are talking about this delusional issue .They need to stop terrorism in their country first
You give independence to Baluchistan and Pakhtunkhawa, and allow POK to join India, we will help you.
Ola hu Uber 😂🕋☕☪️🤲🤲⚰🌋🔥☄☄ 💥 💥 💥
@@Lifegoeson98-z6x Teaching of muhmmad baping minor girl 😂
@@Lifegoeson98-z6x 7000* by the way i don't support that cringe BS spam
@@Lifegoeson98-z6x better than teaching of 1400 old paedo
He is educated articulate guy. Also he shared that failed Pakistan will be liability for India. We indians n our Government had Plan B to handle failed Pakistan. Already we resolved by making Bangladesh. Next time, it will be divided by 5 countries. Stable and developed Pakistan is more dangerous than instable Pakistan. Jai hind
A stable Pakistan is a bigger liability to the whole world .
Look at his arrogance
This is superior delusion of being a Muslim
If india will give money to pak then india will also loose money like china...why nobody thinking this?
This talks and interview have been started as step towards getting help from India. Don't fall for it.
Let Muhammad Ali Jinnah wake up from Grave and help Pakistan. Its not India's problem. We have no relation with them since they decided to part ways and form seaprate country in 1947. If they want to break up into 5 states and dissolve Nation of Pakistan and re-integrate with India, Only then we will consider any help.
Pakistan is disintegrating. India should allow this process to continue until the Pakistani people start demanding union with India. Only then should India help the Pakistanis.
I disagree with this pakistani journalist. Stable pakistan is not good for india either.
India should send multiple tons of grass to Pakistan. Because their leader said during the 70's that Pakistani will eat grass if food is not available.
There is no reason to interview the guy from the other side. No need to help them. Let them stay where they are. Let them be unstable or otherwise, we are well prepared to deal with them. Let them not give crap and bull stories. No one will buy them, let alone India under our Honourable Modi Ji. The 3 reasons thst he mentioned are all their own doing. They are in their last leg. Let them dissolve into oblivion for good. Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
This gentleman should talk to Pakistan military establishment before he speaks to any Indian.He carries a chip on his shoulder and staying in US is not interested in the Indian subcontinent.he is glorifying the role played by Mr . Musharraf and tries to intimidate.
Madam you have wasted your time.
I strongly disagree with your view that prosperous Pakistan would be helpful to India.
Contrary, prosperous Pakistan is dangerous for India in terms of arrogancy of Pakistan at international forums, security at the borders, exploiting the situation geographically, etc...
Current scenario is really helped India in checking situation at borders east and west of Pakistan, handling of situation in Afghanistan, Chinese interference, etc etc.. globally Pakistan is completely isolated...
Habit never dies. Mindset never changes. India will be a fool of galactical magnitude if it helps Pakistan.
Whatever the western analyst has to say India should let Pakistan disintegrate. It is in our interest. Let it break abd fight amoung themselves.
Thanks...but no
We can't help a nation which is pointing weapons on us. Throw your weapons and get help.
How come there is a sudden change in tune of Wajahat?
Bachpan se jhooth aur nafrat, jihadmpadhaya gaya hai, to Pakistanion se aur kya ummeed kar sakte hain....issliye Bharat ka koi bhi interest naheen hai Pakistan ke saath koi bhi relation rakhne ka. Jab pehle thaa yo Pakistan ne uski ehmiyat samjhi naheen aur MFN status de rakha thaa Infia ne to bahut zyada sasti rate psr India se samaan jaa raha thaa. Pakistan tab kua karta thaa??? Pakistan ne jung musallat kari, aur Dehshatgardi karke hamare.masoom logon ko maarta raha. Khalistanion ko help karta hai aur weaponize karta hai. BHART KYON AISE MULK KO HELP KAREGA?????????????? We as Indians do not want India to help a terrorist nation and no relationship should be resumed at all. Pakistan is destroying itself due to it's own deeds. The basic foundation of all Pakistanis is based on LIES, HATRED FOR OTHERS, & JIHAD. What do you think why your people are suffering??? Pakistan is suffering due to it's mindset. Pakistanis do not want to know the facts.
Yeh koi tareeka hai bheek maangne ka......!!!!
*INDIA don't need converts. Bhaarat koi dhamshal nhi*
I want the stuff this guy is high on ' Stable Pakistan is good for India". Really?
Historically a stable Pakistan is a constant nuance. Pakistan elite's Hindu/India hatred is which stops them from any cordial relations.
Remember pre Modi era? We were kind of habitual of hearing news of bomb blasts continuously on different Indian cities. It is only in last few year instability in that Islamist country we are safe from Jihadist activities.
A stable Pakistan will create more 26/11 in India Bharat ki gaddi pe modi hai
Sunahai Pakistan government Twitter account block hogaya
Ab to Elon musk bhi RSS wala nikla
Maza aaraha hai ? 🇮🇳💪
I feel that Kashmir should be resolved before any help can be extended.. Only than can we start progress..🇮🇳
You have fallen for the lie that Pakistan tells the world, ie, solve the Kashmir issue and everything will be fine.
In fact, at a deeper level, this is an ideological dispute between two civilizations which began when the Muslims first attacked India and the Pakistani State is now taken over the same role.
Pakistan has a visceral hatred for everything that India stands for, just as the Arab States have towards Israel.
So, the end result that Pakistan wants is the destruction of India, not the settling of the Kashmir dispute
Kashmir issue will never gonna settle as it is the only way Pakistan army gets funds from Western world, Muslim ummah and leverage in their country. Kashmir issue settling is Same like NATO accepting Russia in to their block.
Kashmir will get resolved once Pakistan stops obsessing about it. Once Pakistan stops being India's enemy there is nothing to prevent an EU like structure with freedom of movement. Once that happens nobody really cares where the official border is.
aim sud to be to take pok not the people ...... dharti wapas leni hai na ki log...
@@urrasscal8380 Population exchange with Pakistan practically not possible now.
No Pakistan increases the chances of more prosperous India
no, we should not care about it. just like the russia Ukraine BS
not india, ask pak army to decrease its spending and give to for human development...