is it me or this kind of video is wayyyy better than other youtuber with tons of cinematic shots and talks a lot during the intro and takes forever to get to the point. Your style brings me way back to when youtube just started when it was golden. Now it's all filled with B-roll and loud music. I'm a Sony user but I just watch your videos because of how you portray your content. But to each its own! I like how you are doing it and please continue to do so :)
Glad you appreciate it. I hate the modern 'youtube' style too, so I just try to make what I want to see: to the point and not trying so hard to be cool. :)
Terrific comment. I am just returning to photography and looking for specific info to get back up to speed. So many Yutubers taking you on "their journey"and are almost click bate.Fornuatly a few like this guy that I am happy to subscribe to.Cheers.
@@hagsve Yeah we just try to keep it pure and authentic. But I also get why so many youtubers go that more polished / clickbait route: because they want to grow their channels quickly. We are growing very slowly. But I'm okay with that. :)
One thing which wasn't mentioned here about AF was the issues you can have with DSLRs in calibration. I have always had issues achieving critical focus using AF, even on my D850 - especially with third party glass but not exclusively (this is why we have features such as AF Fine Tune after all). Having AF on the sensor itself, for me, is one of the biggest reasons to go mirrorless. It is just a better integrated and more modern approach. Excellent video, thanks.
I think that makes sense. It's something I haven't thought about until you and another person pointed it out. I do know that a dedicated AF sensor has been eliminated, but I did not consider the benefit in terms of AF accuracy. In general, I love when things get simpler. The best part is no part! :)
Nice video. You pointed out all important things. I have a Z 6II with the Z24-70/2.8S and Z24-200/4-6.3 and I love my gear. The Z24-200 is the best travel lens I ever had. The Z24-70/2.8S is a great standard lens. I love the Nikon Z-System. Greetings from Germany Keep going Stephan
I exchanged my D850 for a Z7. I won some (IBIS) and lost some (AF is not as good as the D850), but in the end I am happy. Most of all because of the Z-lenses. They are really good!!
Awesome! The most exciting things about the Z cameras is the mount and the new glass. I'm eager to get some, but waiting for the pancake primes that Nikon is supposed to announce this year. I'm also looking forward to Nikon improving the technical parts of the cameras, such as the AF. I would love to have a smaller, more precise AF points for tracking.
as a Canon / Sony user...i bought a Z6ii (and picked up a used 24-70/4 S)... WoW amazing fun camera and great images... Love it!! I have it to toggle front top button to single point tracking or eye tracking with back button focus..... it works amazing. I get sharp beautiful color images. Excellent low light performer, even with the F4 lens... i was amazed.
I do face the problem of evf turning on while bringing it up.. the one trick I start using is put my finger to the evf sensor when bringing it up. When the sensor is coverd it start to get on. So there is a improvement in that it almost on my the time it reach the eye
But on my Z6 when I use EVF Only Mode + Infinity for the stand-by timer the EVF is always on and the upper OLED screen is also on. You do not need to half-press shutter to activate EVF or OLED screen. The minus / cons for that is that you cannot playback picture after you taking it. You need to change the Viewfinder Mode to something different or watch the picture thru the EVF. Other disadvantage of the EVF is blinking - on Z6 is the same as my D750 or D300s And last one formats of the picture - on Z6 you expect to see framing with 1:1 or 5:4, well no it will blacks the area outside the crop factor in the EVF.
@@orbital2001 Interesting, I don't use EVF only for that reason. I use EVF priority instead, which means the menus and reviewing are still on the back screen. I haven't tried standby to infinite. I will try that! :)
Great video, Very informative. I have a Z6ii with a 24-70 f4, and FTZ Adapter coming tomorrow, I’ve been using a d750. I plan to use some of my F glass lenses. Looking forward to more videos on the Z6ii
one point, the D 850, and other dslr's have a Q (quiet) shutter, this only makes the shutter button reset the mirror, etc. after the button is released, so you can do it in a jacket, etc. it is designed not to scare wildlife. The SILENT mode is an electronic shutter Only on mirror less and a select few dslr's like the D 750/ 780 cameras, but for long shutter exposure times, this system makes the sensor scan the image sensor like a flat bed you use for paper scanning, this creates blur in the image, and jello effect for video ( can't scan entire sensor area, so if movement occurs this gets recorded, like star trails, or panning a car shot with the headlights on), but this is why having BOTH types is best, use the right tool for the job, where one has a flaw, the other doesn't, so you have options.
You are exactly right! I used to use the Quiet mode on my D4. But the nice thing is that on the Z6, the regular shutter is even quieter than the the Q mode on the D4. Honestly, this is not a big deal either way for my kind of photography, but it's nice bonus feature. :)
I made the switch from my trusted nikon dSLR's that i been using for the past 13 years to the Z7II 2 months ago. I agree with all your points of critique. Very well worded. The EVF was my biggest potential pain-point as well; having had some terrible experiences with some 2nd gen Fuji stuff. I do find it strange that if you shoot using the back LCD. You can always have that on (i.e just looking shooting with a phone) - but when you set the monitor mode to EVF only, the EVF won't stay on unless your eye is up to it. Which is weird. Why can i not set the EVF timeout to x minute value and keep it on ? If i could have my way. I would always have the EVF on. And if i walk around and i know i won't be taking shots i would switch the camera off. Switching the camera on -> ready to take a snap is a split second. Shorter than raising it to my eye. So, i would have preferred this method.
I totally agree! I think the issue might be battery life though. I know it's counterintuitive but the EVF apparently burns more energy than the back LCD. I think it has something to do with the higher pixel density. But I think it should certainly be an option. One should have the choice to manage the battery by turning the camera on and off when needed.
I just bought Nikon D700 yesterday really loving old style and b & w pics are superb, and built like a tank. Hopefully nikon will make another legendry mirrorless like that.
There is definitely missing a real pro body in the Z lineup. Using F2s, F5s (digital and analogue), and a D4 (sold my D3 because of ergonomic reasons), I can‘t really justify a Z body at the moment. I am rather looking at getting a Leica SL Typ 601 used. I fell in love with that solid sucker and the optional vertical grip.
@@Funktrainer Yeah, it's true the Z6/Z7 are not quite top tier bodies, but that's expected, especially at this price point. I'm sure Nikon is cooking a 'Z1' or whatever they're gonna call it! :)
You made a great point about the EVF lag. I have a 5 month old son now, and I notice it more now than ever. When I need a lightning quick shot my old DSLR's do a much better job of allowing me to capture the moment. On the other hand, I get more autofocus misses with my d700 and my d4 than on my Z6ii. It's like this, I make a silly face to get him to smile or laugh then I move my eye into the EVF so that he tracks my eye and eventually looks at the lens. When I do that quickly I'm staring into a black abyss for what seems like an eternity. I'll still fire off the shutter a couple of times just in case, but it's still mildly annoying. If I shoot while using the rear screen then he's looking at me and not the camera. Great video(s) btw. I think this has to be my new favorite channel.
Thank you so much! Yeah, this lag is also noticeable when doing street photography. Same as you, I fire off a shot while staring at the blackness. Sometimes, I get it that way. :)
I made the move from d750 which I absolutely loved to the z6 about two years ago. Once I started using the z6 I never wanted to pick up my d750. Going to get z6ii or z7ii haven’t decided yet, once they become available, out of stock at Adorama for ever:(
Very fair summary. My D850 is about to go on sale whilst I can get a decent price for it as there is no reason to pick it up over my Z6II. I don’t get involved in the DSLR v ML nonsensical wars that go on - as you say, they are tools and it’s whichever will do the job. Even the much maligned AF-C tracking is now very good indeed - not 100% keepers, of course not, but my 850 wouldn’t have been either.
Very good video explaining the advantages of mirrorless. But you didn't mention anything about Z mount and the new Z lineup lens, which is one of reason people buying into Z mirrorless. Do you like the Z lens or you are adapting F mount lens into Z body? And key question is: If the Nikon Z6 II did not comes with the optional battery grip function, like Z6, will you pull the trigger? Because seems like you prefer the grip rather than the smaller and lighter body which is also the main feature why going into mirrorless
Well, at the time I didn't own any Z lenses yet, so I couldn't speak about it. But yeah, now that I have a few I totally agree! The lenses are great. In many cases they are smaller, lighter, and optically superior! Regarding the grip, it is one of they key features that forced me to wait for the Z6II, along with the dual card slots. I explain why in this video here: ua-cam.com/video/k9bLFotbbxw/v-deo.html
As a user considering to leave my D800 from 2012, and switch to mirroless, this was a great video. The AF on the D800 has annoyed me since day 1, and now I can get a Z6ii for 1k Euros, whitch give me 4K Euros to buy lenses for, and can both(In add to the Z6ii itself) get me the 70-200S and 24-70 for the price of just the Z8 body. To me it`s action, watches, cars conserts and portraits that is the main interest, and for the price it seem to be a very good option. While dreaming and saving for a Z8 in the future :-). Great channel you have created.
Your workman-like approach is really appreciated. I have been tempted by the IBIS and silent shutter, but now feel like waiting for a model that will metre (and auto-expose)with older lenses (and autofocus afd lenses?), as I'm really covered by Nikon and Tamron vr and vc lenses for stabilization.
Glad you found this video useful! I dunno if Nikon is going to make new cameras with better compatibility with their older lenses, but I get the desire to keep using them. Classic glass has such a nice charm to it! :)
Fantastic video. Really helpful. Thanks so much. I have a D750 and I am thinking of going mirrorless. The Z6II is the route I am looking to go and your video helped a great deal. Thanks again.
Thank you so much for saying so! I'm glad to hear that!! I've had mine for around 6 months now and I love it! It has a few small flaws, but overall it's a joy to use! :)
A good informative video. I own a D700, D810 and a D4s that I purchased used with very few activations (less then 7,000). I thought I might trade/sell the 810 for a Z6ii. Now I am considering exchanging the D4s. Mainly less weight and more pixels on the z6ii. I have a boat load of f mount so going to another brand such as Canon or Fuji would be too expensive. I am not into sports shooting. Mainly landscapes, some birding and wildlife and of course pets and family. I think a d810 and z6ii would make a good combo. Your thoughts.
I agree that a D810 and Z6II make a good combo. The Z6II is built for speed and low light performance, so it's a healthy upgrade from the D4. The D810 is great for high-res applications like landscape, so it makes sense to keep that one over the D4s.
Nice feedback of your experience with that mirrorless Z6II. Even though i prefer your vlogs of just being out and shoot, it is nice to see your very practical orientated approach in this one, not just fancy-specs-comparing, like many others do. Great sharp shots, even with 1/2 sec. Looks like you have IBIS in your hands too :-). Nice this cam makes your photographing experience easier. Btw, you speak excellent english and explain very good (very clear, structured, and on point), great teaching skills!
Thank you so much!! I like our street vlogs more too, but I just really wanted to get my thoughts on this camera out in a very clear and concise video. I'll keep these lecture videos pretty rare. :)
One things that helps with waking the camera up is if you start half pressing the shutter when you start to pick it up. This wakes up the camera and after a while you just forget you're doing it.
Hi - thanks for posting this. A question for you: I just picked up the Nikon Z6ii. I agree with all of what you mention here but thinking of returning it for one reason only: You mention it being comfortable for you but because I’m petite (5’2” with very thin wrists and had a procedure on my thumb last year due to repetitive stress) the ergonomics are not great. I got the kit lens 24-70mm and over the weekend the weight was a bit much. I was also carrying around the Ricoh GR that I have had for years and ended up leaving the Nikon at the hotel because it was simply too much to carry…. In retrospect, my question is if I want a good travel and street camera is another lens on the z6ii the way to go or should I look at another interchangeable lens camera? The Ricoh is my buddy but for me, not great for instances where I want to switch from say, 28mm to 50mm. I tried Fuji but find that the colors are great for people shots but for landscapes and city scapes, nothing beats the Nikon. I come from a 35mm and medium format world so quality of images is big for me. If you have time to comment, I’d appreciate to hear your thoughts. New to this channel!
I see! Thank you for your take on this. First off, yeah definitely a smaller lens would be good, e.g. a prime lens. But since you enjoy using zoom lenses unfortunately there are no great choices right now in the Z-mount lens selection. However, for the Z50 / Zfc, which are DX cameras, they do have a 16-50mm zoom lens, although with a limited aperture. So, it's a pretty big trade off. I would consider carrying around a couple of small primes and switching them out. For example, Nikon has recently release a set of compact 28mm and 40mm Z-mount lenses for full frame cameras. Perhaps consider those?
@@EYExplore Thank you for taking the time to respond. I took out my D750 and compared the weight to the Z6ii with no lenses and the weight is exactly the same. This helps me from that standpoint to know that I need to make a compromise for sure. I’ll return the z6ii, unfortunately because of the weight. In the end, I want that full frame quality with lens options…I’m wondering if Leica is calling my name. I’ll have to look to see if you have reviewed any Leica bodies. Thank you again!
@@juliette-mansour I'll probably never get into Leica. It's just too expensive for me, and the lack of AF on the M line means it's useless for my job. I use my Nikon cameras for fun, street, etc., but I also use them for work and easily justify the cost because I make money with them. Though, I do know some photographers who love Leica, so if you can justify the costs, I'd say go for it! :)
great detailed vid! couple questions regarding ibis: 1. does lenses with stabilization stack with the ibis? 2. if not, then isnt the stabilization equal vs dslr with vr lenses? 3. does the adapter for using f lenese reduce the stabilizing alot since it loses 2 points? thanks for any response. im looking to get z6ii and weighing some pros and cons to switching to dslr. maybe even keep it so i have both. thanks again.
Thanks! And some great questions! 1. According to Nikon, using lenses with VR does help, so in a sense it stacks. But I don't know how much of a positive effect this has. 2. The IBIS is definitely WAY better than a DSLR with just the lens VR. 3. What do you mean by it losing 2 points? As far as I know, using the adapter does not diminish the effectiveness of VR in F-mount lenses. However, even if does, the IBIS more than makes up for it.
There is nothing wrong with the older Nikon DSLR. If you're currently using one you can shoot it till you turn 200. As a teenager, my first Nikon was a film (F2). Much, much later I got into digital s starting with the D50. Over the years I accumulated several DSLR and a stable of lenses. I purchased a Z6 when it was released (it came with the 24-70 f4 / S kit lens). That first week of use I realized mirror-less was the future. Gone are all my DSLRs and F lenses. (I kept one with a couple of F lenses) Along with a couple of Nikon film SLRs. Now I own a couple of Zs along with some Z Primes and some zooms. Nikon may not be the best in the World, but their Z system cameras and lenses (primes and zooms) are off the scale. I hope you enjoy them as much as I do.
one thing about mirror less cameras and AF is that they do their calculations on the SENSOR PLANE, not via a separate AF sensor/ focusing engine, so the W.Y.S.I.W.Y.G. principle applies, no AF wandering due to heat expansion, mount displacement, etc. all of this is compensated by viewing focus on the sensor itself, so more in- focus images!!
Yes, very true! It also means they can more easily analyze the image (which how we can face/eye tracking). I'm also impressed that it's possible to combine contrast detect and phase detect AF on the sensor. Pretty cool! :)
Enjoy your video. Been looking at the Z6ii for awhile now and the only thing holding me back from purchasing it is that the Z6ii can't make big prints. Maybe Z7ii might be better option for me. What do you think? Thank you from Jamaica.
What is your definition of 'big prints'? Even with my 16mp D4 I was able to print A3 at 300 DPI. I've also printed those photos in A1 after up-scaling and they look amazing. The Z6II has 24mp so A2 is within reach. And with careful up-scaling, you can easily get that resolution to 96mp and print gigantic. But of course, if you want more pixels out of the camera, then yeah a Z7II is the way to go. I personally don't want so much resolution because the data really piles up with how much I shoot. :)
@@EYExplore Big Prints in terms of 30" x 40". That size I believe will be better than the z6ii because it only has a 24.5 MP and that is not enough to print big.
@@Cocolo_TV I think if you want to print that big you should definitely get a Z7II. However, I'm confident that I can print Z6II files at that size and they will look great.
@@EYExplore I believe I can do it too. But I think I will have an easier time with the z7ii although I do not want to pay the extra $1000 just for the 45.7MP. The Z6ii from what I've researched is a better all around camera and with the new firmware update it can shoot 4k 60p.
@@Cocolo_TV I think the Z7II can also shoot 4k 60p. Regarding printing large, it's very easy to upscale the images using Photoshop and the 'Preserve Details 2.0' setting. It does an amazing job of upscaling.
I personally would go with the Z6II as I find the tracking AF system in the EVF to be more user-friendly. I do wish that the focus point could be smaller when using tracking AF, however. The D850 is certainly no slouch. Of course, regarding resolution the D850 is much higher, basically the same as a Z7II. Finally, despite the drawbacks of the EVF that I mentioned in the video, now that I'm getting used it I generally enjoy using it a lot!
I watched a video where the black curtain was demonstrated. That is 10 frames per second then 5 frames per second. With the 5 frames per second the black curtain which happens with every frame would certainly help you to lose the moving subject such a a flying bird. However, that was on the Z7 ii . In truth I do not do video much and it is only the silent shutter that appeals to me on mirrorless at present. I want to get a Nikon mirrorless but on the autofocus Nikon is behind Cannon and Sony. Nikon has said that they are now going to concentrate on mirrorless cameras so it does not make sense to me at the present to get a z6/7 ii when a better one way come out in the coming months.
The number one reason , and the only major reason, I want to switch to to mirrorless is the size. A full frame mirrorless is basically the same size as my aps-c DSLR. Other than that, I don't see mirrorless as an advantage or a disadvantage over all, but packing a full frame sensor in a smaller body is the key thing for me. I'm planning to get a z6/7 or mark ii or something in the near future.
That makes sense. Without the grip, the Z6 is very small compared to Nikon's SLRs. As I mentioned, I like them big, but I totally get that many people want smaller cameras. :)
The body is smaller, yes, but the Z lenses are much larger than their F mount equivalents, and F lenses on the FTZ are identical in length to a Z lens… so I find overall it’s a wash for size.
Very helpful, thank you. I'm glad your impressions are not scientific. I don't take photos in a lab. Your organic, real-world information is the most useful kind.
@@EYExplore Excellent! By the way, I'm the same guy that's been interacting with you in your Patreon comments recently ("Mark the Edward"), and decided to just come to UA-cam and watch stuff and interact with you here, though I do appreciate that you put up your archives on DropBox again. Thanks for that.
After watching enough UA-cam video. Im positive you will be a successful UA-camr if you keep putting efforts in it, and stay who you are. You will change, but please change in a better way. Love your channel.
Thank you so much!! Actually full confession: I really don't like the idea of 'UA-camr' and I'm trying to grow the channel without resorting to all those UA-camr tactics, like clickbait and padded videos where they make you stay to the end, etc. I just want to share my knowledge and love of urban photography with more and more people. I really appreciate your words of encouragement. :)
Great review! As far as tracking things not just across the frame, what about things moving closer (changing depths), like someone walking or running to you? With that excellent pan shot, the EVF is still good for panning and what about blackout? Thanks man!
Thanks! Glad you found it useful! And great question! It's extremely good at things moving closer, much better than my D4. Blackout is still a thing of course, but that's the same with a DSLR like my old D4, so I guess I'm just used to it. However, I did order a Z9 and I am looking forward to no blackout. It's gonna be wild! :)
I tried that, but as you remove you hand it turns off. You'd have to keep your hand there all the way up to your eye, which is so cumbersome it defeat the purpose. :)
Ah, good point! I didn't double check this. So, perhaps it doesn't stop ALL the way down, but still when shooting with an f/1.4 lens, getting a live preview of the DOF up to f/5.6 is a huge help!
HI EYExplore, Z6 II. iTTL doesnt work , i ttry up 3 flash guns. Any idea of why could hapend? They do work in the Z6 iTTL Any setting i have to change?
No idea. I'm not really an expert on flash. I use it only occasionally. But maybe try a factory reset of the settings (it's a pain, I know) as there might be some obscure setting that's causing the issue.
Good question, but no it does not. It will, however, wake up the camera from standby mode. Standby can be completely disabled in the menu. But this is a deeper 'sleep' mode, not merely turning off the EVF. There is no option for the EVF to stay on unfortunately.
If I remember correctly adobe automatically applies certain correction to the Z6 and Z7 raw files when loading into lightroom. I believe they gave the option to turn it off.
Hmmm, intersting. I use Adobe Camera Raw, and the only option is the camera profile. On the D4, the Camera Standard profile was great, but on the Z6 it's okay sometimes, but I tend edit more often in the Adobe Standard profile. This is what I meant by quirks. It's nothing major! :)
Wonderful review. RE: battery life, my new Z 6ii, as well as my experience with my old Z 6, I get well over 1,000 images on a battery, and the battery is still like half full. I’ve never run out of 1 battery in a day. I’ve shot all day weddings, family sessions, events, etc. (The weddings I’m shooting more than 1 camera, so it’s not all on that 1 battery). Like you, I’ve found battery life to be a non issue. Again, great review, thanks!
Glad to hear it! Especially with the grip, I've never run out both batteries in one session. This was something I was a bit worried about before I got the camera, but now it's a non-issue exactly as you say. :)
Theyre a bit small , i was hoping the new cameras would be d850 size and choice of a chunky grip to fit us with larger hands , il stick to my d850s for now
This was the exact video I’ve been looking for. I’ve been shooting a D810 for many years and I love it, but it’s time to add a new body to my lineup. The jump to mirrorless has been stressing me out so it’s nice to hear that you’ve had a good experience with it so far. The lag is concerning but I shoot primarily real estate so I feel like it would be less of an issue than with street photography. Really appreciate the information here and in your other videos.
Yes, and now it's been nearly 6 months and I'm still loving it. Did some street photography this morning and then a corporate portrait shoot after that. Overall, the camera killed it for both! That lag of the viewfinder turning on is the only annoying thing, but for the portrait shoot it was really a non-issue.
Very well!! But I do think the AF is a bit faster on native Z mount lenses. It's just my anecdotal feeling. I never did any comprehensive tests. So, it could also just be my imagination. :)
Excellent video and just subscribed. I normally shoot wildlife with my D500 and although it's a great camera, at 68 , perhaps it's time to change. I like your no nonsense approach and appreciate you sharing :-)
Thanks for subscribing! the D500 is great for wildlife (so I hear) and since the Z6II is full frame you might miss some of the reach the smaller sensor offers.
I think the Z6II is better and high speed and low light shooting, which you may encounter during weddings. The D850 has more resolution and but that may not be useful unless intend to print large or crop a lot. The Z6II has better low light AF, by a large margin, in my experience.
That's a big plunge all at once! Why not do them one at a time? Honestly, you should see my more recent video about the Z9. I would rather have one Z9 than two Z6s. :)
Yeah that's for sure! But I do hope Nikon eventually solve this issue. I think using the accelerometer to detect when the camera is being lifted up would work for this!
Yes, at this point my D4 is a memento in the closet. I plan on pulling out to do some videos for the channel, to kinda reminisce about it. But that would be the the only reason to use it these days. Also, I do now use a Z9 instead of a Z6II, which makes that decision even easier.
Have you ever tried "interval timer shooting" on the Z6II? My setting is A, auto ISO up to 51200, over 1000 shots. I have a random issue, first 10 to 20 photos are overexposed (totally white) then it shows exposure back to normal gradually.
@@EYExplore No, bracketing is not engaged. If bracketing is engaged then it will happen every time I shoot. It happens to me once a while. Five, seven, ten times are ok then it happens once, two times...
What do you recommend regarding lenses? I am thinking about transitioning to a Z5 or Z6 from a D750. However, I don't have the ambition to swap out my whole kit right away (I mainly use primes). How do the older lenses perform with the adapter? If you do recommend discarding my lenses voor new lenses? If so, what's there to stop me from looking at other brands. Sony and Canon are a bit more 'mature' in the mirrorless world which might prove to be a solid alternative.
F-mount lenses work perfectly with the adapter. But the new Z lenses are very sharp also a bit lighter and smaller on average (especially when you factor in the adapter). I haven't gotten any Z lenses yet but I am looking forward to the 28mm and 40mm pancake lenses that Nikon plans to release this year. If you're going to replace your entire kit, there is no general reason I can give for to stay with Nikon. It's a personal preference. I myself do not like the ergonomics of Sony's cameras. Canon is very good, but I don't see any major advantages, besides for video. And for me, the video capability of the Z6 is more than enough for my purposes. One more thing: I would say the in the long run the Z system will have the best glass selection. Nikon's lenses are already excellent, and the very large mount and shot flange distance allow for some interesting lens designs apparently! :)
@@EYExplore Thanks! That is some good info. I was kind of hesitant because of the failure of the Nikon 1 lineup. I prefer Nikon as well but I'm also looking for something to build on in the coming years. Good to hear that you see a lot of green flags in transitioning to Nikon Z.
@@_krakra_ Not really. it makes little difference in the end. Although, if they ever made a fancy metal version that's also weather-sealed, I'd get it and easily pay double for it. But this one is fine. :)
Personally, I like it when I'm the one who decides where the focus should be, not the camera. If I have a dog running towards me, it is good if all the pictures are sharp, not just something single at the beginning and maybe something at the end.
Yeah, I agree. That's why I use single point tracking focus, which is called Subject Tracking on the Niko Z6II. I Nikon DSLRs I used 3D Tracking, which was recently brought back on the Z9. This is the best way to do AF for me in my use cases. :)
I really don't want so many megapickles! :) But seriously, I shoot a lot, and the data adds up. For most of what shoot, 24mp is easily enough for anything I need, even printing at A1 size, which I rarely do. The Z7's 45mp is overkill for me. However, sometimes I get client work that requires it. In this case I can just rent the Z6 or D850 as needed. :)
On the d4 you can voice tag images and then send them via a Nikon transmitter connected to the camera, can the z6ii do voice tagging and allow sending from the camera to ftp servers?
@@EYExplore Nikon seem so slow with mirrorless, it’s getting to the point where I’ll change to canon who have big tele lenses coming out to back up there coverage (800mm & 1200mm) with Nikon only going to 600mm, and still no pro body.
@@amacmedia3221 It depends what your needs are. If there is something the R5 has that you need, then by all means. For me the R5 + the cost of new glass is just too expensive to be worth it. But there is nothing the R5 has that I need for anything I do (at this time).
I'm action, sports wildlife areas & tried the Z6 &z7 mark ii cameras against my D5 and D6 cameras in areas from Athletics, Football, Formula 1,Motorbike racing. I FOUND the Z mount cameras focusing was crap & lost focusing numerous times on the Z6ii and Z7 ii in these environments. Z6 AND Z7 cameras maybe ok for other areas like architectural, portrait, product or street the Z6 and Z7 cameras are suitable. BUT SPORTS AREAS or Wildlife Photography the current Z mount cameras I wouldn't buy. Hopefully the pro mirrorless D6 version will come to light in 2021.
Fair enough. I have used the D5 extensively and found the Z6II to work just as well for me. It's true, I don't shoot sports per se, but there are things that move in my photography as well and the Z6II keeps up well in my experience (thought I haven't used the D5 is a long while so maybe I just don't remember). I will say though that I wish they provided an option to make the focus point smaller. Sometimes it's just too big to be precise for photos where there is a lot of foreground clutter (like birds in a tree for example). I've only tried the D6 in the store and was very impressed with the AF. I wouldn't be surprised if it was way better than the Z6, but that's a camera that costs 3-4 times as much, so it better be! I am also looking forward to a pro 'Z1' or something, hopefully this year. I should add, I do think there is room for improvement in the AF system on the Z cameras, both in speed/accuracy and in usability.
You know, you comment got me to go out and try some more 'sporty' photographer, namely panning shots of cars on the streets. I admit, after many tests, the Z6 was not amazing at tracking, but it did a passable job. I can see how a D5 (and certainly a D6) is better. However, when it came to faces, in a comparison at the shop, the Z6 and D6 both did great. I will probably rent a D6 soon and give it a proper test. Thanks for the impetus! :)
@@EYExplore maybe a future comparison of dslr v mirrorless cameras in action, sports or other fast moving action under daylights or under floodlights or interior sports like basketball, equestrian indoor, rollerblading etc to see suitability of both formats
0:57 alright thanks , that’s all I came here for Lol jk , as if I would ever not watch an Eyexplore video till the end 😂 Edit: 9:55 that shot is so crisp and amazing . Crazy that’s handheld at 1/2sec and only 500 iso
Hehe, thank you! Yeah that shot turned our amazing. I will say it did take a few tries. Not every photo was sharp. I would about 1/3 turned out slightly blurred. But that's still very good. I just held still and took 3 or 4 at a time. :)
@@anatomicshutter3975 Haha, I didn't read carefully. I just got it!! I love these kind of jokes. In Japan they call they 親父がぐ, which means 'old man jokes' but translates better as dad jokes, haha. :)
Do you want to stay with a brick phone or a smart phone? C’mon. It’s obvious. Everything is better. Let’s just hope Nikon can be as successful as Sony & Canon.
I love the camera, but not everything is better. The EVF lag is still noticeable (on all of these cameras, from any maker), and it turns on too slowly when the proximity sensor detects your eye. Also, don't like how the subject tracking needs to be accessed with the push of an additional button. There are a few other things I don't like, albeit they are small. I understand these relatively small things don't matter much, and when shooting for work it's a no-brainer to use a Z6II or Z7II as they offer many advantages despite nuisances. However, when shooting for pleasure I still enjoy my D4 immensely and overall I feel it's more fun to use than the Z6. And since many people who watch videos like this on UA-cam are NOT professionals, it warrants discussion.
Z for ZERO because that’s how many other camera systems Z mount lenses adapt to. The D780 is really two cameras in one… optical viewfinder and live view. For my collection of F mount (Fully Adaptable) lenses I can opt to carry the D780 or a Canon or a Sony or a Fujifilm body depending upon the task at hand. I don’t shoot video.
I don't really mention video in this video. I don't own other camera systems, so what does it matter if the lenses mount to other systems? I have four Z mount lenses that cover from 14mm to 200mm and that's all I need. With FTZ adapter I can use F-mount lenses. So what's the problem?
@@EYExplore It’s no problem if you believe Nikon will always have the best camera body to meet your needs (because Z mount lenses will not mount and infinity focus to any other system) AND you also don’t own any screw drive AF/AF-D lenses… for many folks one or both of these conditions are not true so the better choice is to stick with the best DSLR that meets your needs be it D780 or D850 or whatever. Not everyone has sponsors or an unlimited budget. There are no equivalents of the 105/2 DC nor 135/2 DC in Z mount yet and probably never will be unless $$,$$$ kind of pricing. If Nikon doesn’t survive the coming recession (that risk is rising not falling) then an investment in Z glass will be pretty much worthless unless one decides to ride a dead system into the ground. I will change my view on the Z system if Nikon produces a native FTZ-AF screw drive adapter and high quality native infinity focus adapters to mount Z glass on other systems. Until then for me, and for many long time F mount users, it’s no bueno. And I haven’t even talked about the price, size, weight and build quality advantages of many F mount lenses compared to their Z siblings.
@@bradl2636 I don't have sponsors lol. You think Nikon gave me this stuff? Also, I have a limited budget too. If the Nikon cameras eventually do suck to the point that I don't want to use them (unlikely) then I'll just sell everything and move on. Right now, the camera is great, so I see no problem in investing in their great lenses. If you're so risk averse about 'dead' systems then just stick to Canon or Sony. I agree that Z mount lenses are expensive, but for wieght and size, many are better. I upgraded my F mount 14-24 and 24-70 and both a lighter, smaller, and have improve optical quality (not that the F mount ones were bad or anything). Anyway, you do you, but I just can't really see your 'fear change' perspective. I'm very glad Nikon is trying something new, embracing new technology, and not trying to adhere to a 60 year old standard that is F-mount.
@@EYExplore I apologise I’m not trying to make a personal attack on you my comments are intended to apply generally to highlight specific scenario mainly for legacy F shooters. The 24-70/4 Z sounds like a great option over its F equivalent by all accounts on multiple factors that include the size, weight, construction quality, price and of course IQ. In the case of 50/1.8 Z (for example) though not so much IMHO… in fact my 50/1.8D is stuck on the other side of the planet and I ran out of patience a few weeks ago purchased a replacement brand new in the box for about $72. Just one example of where the F to Z switch value proposition is just isn’t there. Anyway keep up the good work I don’t live in Japan anymore but so many places in your walks are very familiar to me.
@@bradl2636 I'm sorry too, I'm not trying to get into a heated argument. I respect your opinion fully! I guess all I'm saying is that I also had bunch of F mount lenses and recently replaced them all, though they were mostly the main zooms. I do agree that the 1.8 primes are quite pricey, and I myself have no picked them up. However, I did recently the 40mm f/2 and I am blown away with the IQ from a 300 dollar lens (though the build quality is not amazing, but you get what you pay for). Also, Nikon did recently release a 28-75mm f/2.8, which looks like a pretty good budget option over the 24-70mm f/2.8, thought I haven't tried it yet myself. I think they will eventually release more budget primes, but we'll see.
I agree, but sometimes when I cover events, I do feel a bit annoying with my loud-ass shutter. I'm sure most people tune it out and don't care, so it's just my own self-consciousness. In any case, I agree it's not that important.
is it me or this kind of video is wayyyy better than other youtuber with tons of cinematic shots and talks a lot during the intro and takes forever to get to the point. Your style brings me way back to when youtube just started when it was golden. Now it's all filled with B-roll and loud music. I'm a Sony user but I just watch your videos because of how you portray your content. But to each its own! I like how you are doing it and please continue to do so :)
Glad you appreciate it. I hate the modern 'youtube' style too, so I just try to make what I want to see: to the point and not trying so hard to be cool. :)
Terrific comment. I am just returning to photography and looking for specific info to get back up to speed. So many Yutubers taking you on "their journey"and are almost click bate.Fornuatly a few like this guy that I am happy to subscribe to.Cheers.
For the old gen of youtube watchers like my self, your consept is outstanding.@@EYExplore
@@hagsve Yeah we just try to keep it pure and authentic. But I also get why so many youtubers go that more polished / clickbait route: because they want to grow their channels quickly. We are growing very slowly. But I'm okay with that. :)
One thing which wasn't mentioned here about AF was the issues you can have with DSLRs in calibration. I have always had issues achieving critical focus using AF, even on my D850 - especially with third party glass but not exclusively (this is why we have features such as AF Fine Tune after all).
Having AF on the sensor itself, for me, is one of the biggest reasons to go mirrorless. It is just a better integrated and more modern approach.
Excellent video, thanks.
I think that makes sense. It's something I haven't thought about until you and another person pointed it out. I do know that a dedicated AF sensor has been eliminated, but I did not consider the benefit in terms of AF accuracy. In general, I love when things get simpler. The best part is no part! :)
Nice video. You pointed out all important things. I have a Z 6II with the Z24-70/2.8S and Z24-200/4-6.3 and I love my gear.
The Z24-200 is the best travel lens I ever had. The Z24-70/2.8S is a great standard lens. I love the Nikon Z-System.
Greetings from Germany
Keep going
Stephan
Thanks for the feedback!! I really want to get that 24-70 2.8Z. I will certainly get it eventually! :)
Excellent discussion and presentation. Looking at the Z6ii myself. Very much enjoy all of your posts. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks!! Glad to hear it was useful! I wasn't sure how it would be received since it's quite different from our other videos. :)
I own Z6 II, Dynamic Range on Z6 II is superb
It really is!! :)
I exchanged my D850 for a Z7. I won some (IBIS) and lost some (AF is not as good as the D850), but in the end I am happy. Most of all because of the Z-lenses. They are really good!!
Awesome! The most exciting things about the Z cameras is the mount and the new glass. I'm eager to get some, but waiting for the pancake primes that Nikon is supposed to announce this year. I'm also looking forward to Nikon improving the technical parts of the cameras, such as the AF. I would love to have a smaller, more precise AF points for tracking.
as a Canon / Sony user...i bought a Z6ii (and picked up a used 24-70/4 S)... WoW amazing fun camera and great images... Love it!! I have it to toggle front top button to single point tracking or eye tracking with back button focus..... it works amazing. I get sharp beautiful color images. Excellent low light performer, even with the F4 lens... i was amazed.
Glad to hear that! I was also amazed when I first got mine. Super cool camera! :)
I do face the problem of evf turning on while bringing it up.. the one trick I start using is put my finger to the evf sensor when bringing it up. When the sensor is coverd it start to get on. So there is a improvement in that it almost on my the time it reach the eye
I think I might have to start practicing that. It crossed my mind but it requires training some new muscle memory to do it without thinking. :)
But on my Z6 when I use EVF Only Mode + Infinity for the stand-by timer the EVF is always on and the upper OLED screen is also on.
You do not need to half-press shutter to activate EVF or OLED screen.
The minus / cons for that is that you cannot playback picture after you taking it.
You need to change the Viewfinder Mode to something different or watch the picture thru the EVF.
Other disadvantage of the EVF is blinking - on Z6 is the same as my D750 or D300s
And last one formats of the picture - on Z6 you expect to see framing with 1:1 or 5:4, well no it will blacks the area outside the crop factor in the EVF.
@@orbital2001 Interesting, I don't use EVF only for that reason. I use EVF priority instead, which means the menus and reviewing are still on the back screen. I haven't tried standby to infinite. I will try that! :)
Great video, Very informative. I have a Z6ii with a 24-70 f4, and FTZ Adapter coming tomorrow, I’ve been using a d750. I plan to use some of my F glass lenses. Looking forward to more videos on the Z6ii
Thank you!! Glad you like the camera. I'm looking forward to getting some Z glass! :)
one point, the D 850, and other dslr's have a Q (quiet) shutter, this only makes the shutter button reset the mirror, etc. after the button is released, so you can do it in a jacket, etc. it is designed not to scare wildlife. The SILENT mode is an electronic shutter Only on mirror less and a select few dslr's like the D 750/ 780 cameras, but for long shutter exposure times, this system makes the sensor scan the image sensor like a flat bed you use for paper scanning, this creates blur in the image, and jello effect for video ( can't scan entire sensor area, so if movement occurs this gets recorded, like star trails, or panning a car shot with the headlights on), but this is why having BOTH types is best, use the right tool for the job, where one has a flaw, the other doesn't, so you have options.
You are exactly right! I used to use the Quiet mode on my D4. But the nice thing is that on the Z6, the regular shutter is even quieter than the the Q mode on the D4. Honestly, this is not a big deal either way for my kind of photography, but it's nice bonus feature. :)
I made the switch from my trusted nikon dSLR's that i been using for the past 13 years to the Z7II 2 months ago. I agree with all your points of critique. Very well worded. The EVF was my biggest potential pain-point as well; having had some terrible experiences with some 2nd gen Fuji stuff.
I do find it strange that if you shoot using the back LCD. You can always have that on (i.e just looking shooting with a phone) - but when you set the monitor mode to EVF only, the EVF won't stay on unless your eye is up to it. Which is weird. Why can i not set the EVF timeout to x minute value and keep it on ? If i could have my way. I would always have the EVF on. And if i walk around and i know i won't be taking shots i would switch the camera off. Switching the camera on -> ready to take a snap is a split second. Shorter than raising it to my eye. So, i would have preferred this method.
I totally agree! I think the issue might be battery life though. I know it's counterintuitive but the EVF apparently burns more energy than the back LCD. I think it has something to do with the higher pixel density. But I think it should certainly be an option. One should have the choice to manage the battery by turning the camera on and off when needed.
I just bought Nikon D700 yesterday really loving old style and b & w pics are superb, and built like a tank. Hopefully nikon will make another legendry mirrorless like that.
I love that era of Nikon cameras: the D300, D700, and D3 were all amazing! :)
There is definitely missing a real pro body in the Z lineup. Using F2s, F5s (digital and analogue), and a D4 (sold my D3 because of ergonomic reasons), I can‘t really justify a Z body at the moment. I am rather looking at getting a Leica SL Typ 601 used. I fell in love with that solid sucker and the optional vertical grip.
@@Funktrainer Yeah, it's true the Z6/Z7 are not quite top tier bodies, but that's expected, especially at this price point. I'm sure Nikon is cooking a 'Z1' or whatever they're gonna call it! :)
Great review, I just made the jump and the Z6II was my mirrorless that I jumped too (from a D7100)...no looking back now!
Awesome! I hope you love it! :)
the image at 12:17 is AMAZING. Holy moly that's beautiful
Thank you very much!! Funny story about it, later my friend who lives in Tokyo recognized the dude in the truck. Small world! :)
You made a great point about the EVF lag. I have a 5 month old son now, and I notice it more now than ever. When I need a lightning quick shot my old DSLR's do a much better job of allowing me to capture the moment. On the other hand, I get more autofocus misses with my d700 and my d4 than on my Z6ii. It's like this, I make a silly face to get him to smile or laugh then I move my eye into the EVF so that he tracks my eye and eventually looks at the lens. When I do that quickly I'm staring into a black abyss for what seems like an eternity. I'll still fire off the shutter a couple of times just in case, but it's still mildly annoying. If I shoot while using the rear screen then he's looking at me and not the camera. Great video(s) btw. I think this has to be my new favorite channel.
Thank you so much! Yeah, this lag is also noticeable when doing street photography. Same as you, I fire off a shot while staring at the blackness. Sometimes, I get it that way. :)
Good to hear. I'm still thinking about it. Its a big jump to make. That Z series is getting tempting
It's worth it! :)
its so worth it, i bought a Z7ii to complement my z6..but soon ill upgrade to the z6ii..
I made the move from d750 which I absolutely loved to the z6 about two years ago. Once I started using the z6 I never wanted to pick up my d750. Going to get z6ii or z7ii haven’t decided yet, once they become available, out of stock at Adorama for ever:(
Yeah, it's odd going back. I went out shooting yesterday with my D4 and I really enjoyed it, but it definitely felt strange going back.
Very fair summary. My D850 is about to go on sale whilst I can get a decent price for it as there is no reason to pick it up over my Z6II. I don’t get involved in the DSLR v ML nonsensical wars that go on - as you say, they are tools and it’s whichever will do the job. Even the much maligned AF-C tracking is now very good indeed - not 100% keepers, of course not, but my 850 wouldn’t have been either.
Yeah, I totally agree. The amazing thing these days is that photographers have so many great choices for gear. Whatever floats your boat! :)
Thankyou. Have just acquired a Z6 II and your Vid was excellent and to the point.Have subscribed. Cheers from Australia.
Thank you so much!! :)
Very good video explaining the advantages of mirrorless. But you didn't mention anything about Z mount and the new Z lineup lens, which is one of reason people buying into Z mirrorless. Do you like the Z lens or you are adapting F mount lens into Z body? And key question is: If the Nikon Z6 II did not comes with the optional battery grip function, like Z6, will you pull the trigger? Because seems like you prefer the grip rather than the smaller and lighter body which is also the main feature why going into mirrorless
Well, at the time I didn't own any Z lenses yet, so I couldn't speak about it. But yeah, now that I have a few I totally agree! The lenses are great. In many cases they are smaller, lighter, and optically superior! Regarding the grip, it is one of they key features that forced me to wait for the Z6II, along with the dual card slots. I explain why in this video here: ua-cam.com/video/k9bLFotbbxw/v-deo.html
As a user considering to leave my D800 from 2012, and switch to mirroless, this was a great video. The AF on the D800 has annoyed me since day 1, and now I can get a Z6ii for 1k Euros, whitch give me 4K Euros to buy lenses for, and can both(In add to the Z6ii itself) get me the 70-200S and 24-70 for the price of just the Z8 body. To me it`s action, watches, cars conserts and portraits that is the main interest, and for the price it seem to be a very good option. While dreaming and saving for a Z8 in the future :-). Great channel you have created.
Thank you so much!! Glad you found the video useful! I'm sure you'll love the Z6II!! :)
Your workman-like approach is really appreciated. I have been tempted by the IBIS and silent shutter, but now feel like waiting for a model that will metre (and auto-expose)with older lenses (and autofocus afd lenses?), as I'm really covered by Nikon and Tamron vr and vc lenses for stabilization.
Glad you found this video useful! I dunno if Nikon is going to make new cameras with better compatibility with their older lenses, but I get the desire to keep using them. Classic glass has such a nice charm to it! :)
Thanks for your comment... No, I succombed and am getting a (used) Z6ii
Well crap. You’ve convinced me to move to mirror less. Seriously, nicely thought out and delivered video.
Haha, glad to hear that! I wasn't really trying to convince anyone one way or the other, but I'm happy that my honest opinion was useful to you! :)
Fantastic video. Really helpful. Thanks so much. I have a D750 and I am thinking of going mirrorless. The Z6II is the route I am looking to go and your video helped a great deal. Thanks again.
Thank you so much for saying so! I'm glad to hear that!! I've had mine for around 6 months now and I love it! It has a few small flaws, but overall it's a joy to use! :)
Which Camera did you buy after your D750 ?
@@Stop-All-War I got the Z6II and I really love it!
A good informative video. I own a D700, D810 and a D4s that I purchased used with very few activations (less then 7,000). I thought I might trade/sell the 810 for a Z6ii. Now I am considering exchanging the D4s. Mainly less weight and more pixels on the z6ii. I have a boat load of f mount so going to another brand such as Canon or Fuji would be too expensive. I am not into sports shooting. Mainly landscapes, some birding and wildlife and of course pets and family. I think a d810 and z6ii would make a good combo. Your thoughts.
I agree that a D810 and Z6II make a good combo. The Z6II is built for speed and low light performance, so it's a healthy upgrade from the D4. The D810 is great for high-res applications like landscape, so it makes sense to keep that one over the D4s.
Nice feedback of your experience with that mirrorless Z6II. Even though i prefer your vlogs of just being out and shoot, it is nice to see your very practical orientated approach in this one, not just fancy-specs-comparing, like many others do. Great sharp shots, even with 1/2 sec. Looks like you have IBIS in your hands too :-). Nice this cam makes your photographing experience easier. Btw, you speak excellent english and explain very good (very clear, structured, and on point), great teaching skills!
Thank you so much!! I like our street vlogs more too, but I just really wanted to get my thoughts on this camera out in a very clear and concise video. I'll keep these lecture videos pretty rare. :)
One things that helps with waking the camera up is if you start half pressing the shutter when you start to pick it up. This wakes up the camera and after a while you just forget you're doing it.
You are right. I've been doing this more and more for the past few weeks! :)
Hi - thanks for posting this. A question for you: I just picked up the Nikon Z6ii. I agree with all of what you mention here but thinking of returning it for one reason only: You mention it being comfortable for you but because I’m petite (5’2” with very thin wrists and had a procedure on my thumb last year due to repetitive stress) the ergonomics are not great. I got the kit lens 24-70mm and over the weekend the weight was a bit much. I was also carrying around the Ricoh GR that I have had for years and ended up leaving the Nikon at the hotel because it was simply too much to carry…. In retrospect, my question is if I want a good travel and street camera is another lens on the z6ii the way to go or should I look at another interchangeable lens camera? The Ricoh is my buddy but for me, not great for instances where I want to switch from say, 28mm to 50mm. I tried Fuji but find that the colors are great for people shots but for landscapes and city scapes, nothing beats the Nikon. I come from a 35mm and medium format world so quality of images is big for me. If you have time to comment, I’d appreciate to hear your thoughts. New to this channel!
I see! Thank you for your take on this. First off, yeah definitely a smaller lens would be good, e.g. a prime lens. But since you enjoy using zoom lenses unfortunately there are no great choices right now in the Z-mount lens selection. However, for the Z50 / Zfc, which are DX cameras, they do have a 16-50mm zoom lens, although with a limited aperture. So, it's a pretty big trade off. I would consider carrying around a couple of small primes and switching them out. For example, Nikon has recently release a set of compact 28mm and 40mm Z-mount lenses for full frame cameras. Perhaps consider those?
@@EYExplore Thank you for taking the time to respond. I took out my D750 and compared the weight to the Z6ii with no lenses and the weight is exactly the same. This helps me from that standpoint to know that I need to make a compromise for sure. I’ll return the z6ii, unfortunately because of the weight. In the end, I want that full frame quality with lens options…I’m wondering if Leica is calling my name. I’ll have to look to see if you have reviewed any Leica bodies. Thank you again!
@@juliette-mansour I'll probably never get into Leica. It's just too expensive for me, and the lack of AF on the M line means it's useless for my job. I use my Nikon cameras for fun, street, etc., but I also use them for work and easily justify the cost because I make money with them. Though, I do know some photographers who love Leica, so if you can justify the costs, I'd say go for it! :)
@@EYExplore I actually have no business paying for it either. It was an entertaining thought nonetheless! Keep making great videos!
great detailed vid! couple questions regarding ibis:
1. does lenses with stabilization stack with the ibis?
2. if not, then isnt the stabilization equal vs dslr with vr lenses?
3. does the adapter for using f lenese reduce the stabilizing alot since it loses 2 points?
thanks for any response. im looking to get z6ii and weighing some pros and cons to switching to dslr. maybe even keep it so i have both. thanks again.
Thanks! And some great questions!
1. According to Nikon, using lenses with VR does help, so in a sense it stacks. But I don't know how much of a positive effect this has.
2. The IBIS is definitely WAY better than a DSLR with just the lens VR.
3. What do you mean by it losing 2 points? As far as I know, using the adapter does not diminish the effectiveness of VR in F-mount lenses. However, even if does, the IBIS more than makes up for it.
@@EYExplore thanks! that helps heaps. z6ii seems to be an amazingly fun cam. =)
There is nothing wrong with the older Nikon DSLR.
If you're currently using one you can shoot it till you turn 200.
As a teenager, my first Nikon was a film (F2).
Much, much later I got into digital s starting with the D50.
Over the years I accumulated several DSLR and a stable of lenses.
I purchased a Z6 when it was released (it came with the 24-70 f4 / S kit lens).
That first week of use I realized mirror-less was the future.
Gone are all my DSLRs and F lenses. (I kept one with a couple of F lenses) Along with a couple of Nikon film SLRs.
Now I own a couple of Zs along with some Z Primes and some zooms.
Nikon may not be the best in the World, but their Z system cameras and lenses (primes and zooms) are off the scale.
I hope you enjoy them as much as I do.
Agreed! SLRs are still great! :)
one thing about mirror less cameras and AF is that they do their calculations on the SENSOR PLANE, not via a separate AF sensor/ focusing engine, so the W.Y.S.I.W.Y.G. principle applies, no AF wandering due to heat expansion, mount displacement, etc. all of this is compensated by viewing focus on the sensor itself, so more in- focus images!!
Yes, very true! It also means they can more easily analyze the image (which how we can face/eye tracking). I'm also impressed that it's possible to combine contrast detect and phase detect AF on the sensor. Pretty cool! :)
Love your channel, the lag you talk about with the evf has it gotten any better with firmware updates from Nikon ?
Thank you!! I don't think so, but I've gotten used to it so I don't notice it much anymore. :)
Enjoy your video. Been looking at the Z6ii for awhile now and the only thing holding me back from purchasing it is that the Z6ii can't make big prints. Maybe Z7ii might be better option for me. What do you think? Thank you from Jamaica.
What is your definition of 'big prints'? Even with my 16mp D4 I was able to print A3 at 300 DPI. I've also printed those photos in A1 after up-scaling and they look amazing. The Z6II has 24mp so A2 is within reach. And with careful up-scaling, you can easily get that resolution to 96mp and print gigantic. But of course, if you want more pixels out of the camera, then yeah a Z7II is the way to go. I personally don't want so much resolution because the data really piles up with how much I shoot. :)
@@EYExplore Big Prints in terms of 30" x 40". That size I believe will be better than the z6ii because it only has a 24.5 MP and that is not enough to print big.
@@Cocolo_TV I think if you want to print that big you should definitely get a Z7II. However, I'm confident that I can print Z6II files at that size and they will look great.
@@EYExplore I believe I can do it too. But I think I will have an easier time with the z7ii although I do not want to pay the extra $1000 just for the 45.7MP. The Z6ii from what I've researched is a better all around camera and with the new firmware update it can shoot 4k 60p.
@@Cocolo_TV I think the Z7II can also shoot 4k 60p. Regarding printing large, it's very easy to upscale the images using Photoshop and the 'Preserve Details 2.0' setting. It does an amazing job of upscaling.
I own a D500. Planning to get into full frame.. how do you suggest D850 vs Z6Ii for wild life...
I personally would go with the Z6II as I find the tracking AF system in the EVF to be more user-friendly. I do wish that the focus point could be smaller when using tracking AF, however. The D850 is certainly no slouch. Of course, regarding resolution the D850 is much higher, basically the same as a Z7II. Finally, despite the drawbacks of the EVF that I mentioned in the video, now that I'm getting used it I generally enjoy using it a lot!
I have the R6 with the battery grip and shoot 4K 60 for wildlife and it is super sharp and clear I am very happy. Not to mentions Canons Ant eye AF
Awesome! My buddy has an R and he loves it. I'm sure the R6 is even better! :)
I watched a video where the black curtain was demonstrated. That is 10 frames per second then 5 frames per second. With the 5 frames per second the black curtain which happens with every frame would certainly help you to lose the moving subject such a a flying bird. However, that was on the Z7 ii . In truth I do not do video much and it is only the silent shutter that appeals to me on mirrorless at present. I want to get a Nikon mirrorless but on the autofocus Nikon is behind Cannon and Sony. Nikon has said that they are now going to concentrate on mirrorless cameras so it does not make sense to me at the present to get a z6/7 ii when a better one way come out in the coming months.
This is true, but whatever comes out in the coming months will likely be a flagship model, so quite expensive. Could be worth it though! :)
I read you can half press the shutter to enable the evf before you bring it up as a workaround so it compensates the lag.
Yes, this is true. And I'm trying to train myself to remember to do that more and more.
The number one reason , and the only major reason, I want to switch to to mirrorless is the size. A full frame mirrorless is basically the same size as my aps-c DSLR. Other than that, I don't see mirrorless as an advantage or a disadvantage over all, but packing a full frame sensor in a smaller body is the key thing for me. I'm planning to get a z6/7 or mark ii or something in the near future.
That makes sense. Without the grip, the Z6 is very small compared to Nikon's SLRs. As I mentioned, I like them big, but I totally get that many people want smaller cameras. :)
The body is smaller, yes, but the Z lenses are much larger than their F mount equivalents, and F lenses on the FTZ are identical in length to a Z lens… so I find overall it’s a wash for size.
Very helpful, thank you. I'm glad your impressions are not scientific. I don't take photos in a lab. Your organic, real-world information is the most useful kind.
Thanks for that encouraging feedback! I also like that line: "I don't take photos in a lab." I might drop that in a video one day, haha. :)
@@EYExplore Excellent! By the way, I'm the same guy that's been interacting with you in your Patreon comments recently ("Mark the Edward"), and decided to just come to UA-cam and watch stuff and interact with you here, though I do appreciate that you put up your archives on DropBox again. Thanks for that.
@@marka.200 Ah great! Thanks for letting me know! It's tricky to match people on You
Tube and Patreon. :)
After watching enough UA-cam video. Im positive you will be a successful UA-camr if you keep putting efforts in it, and stay who you are. You will change, but please change in a better way. Love your channel.
Thank you so much!! Actually full confession: I really don't like the idea of 'UA-camr' and I'm trying to grow the channel without resorting to all those UA-camr tactics, like clickbait and padded videos where they make you stay to the end, etc. I just want to share my knowledge and love of urban photography with more and more people. I really appreciate your words of encouragement. :)
@@EYExplore those are the exact reasons why I subscribe.
Glad I found this older video.
Been offered a very deal on a pre-owned Z6ii
@@rocketdog67ify Thanks for subscribing! And glad you found this video useful. I hope you enjoy that Z6II! :)
Great review! As far as tracking things not just across the frame, what about things moving closer (changing depths), like someone walking or running to you? With that excellent pan shot, the EVF is still good for panning and what about blackout? Thanks man!
Thanks! Glad you found it useful! And great question! It's extremely good at things moving closer, much better than my D4. Blackout is still a thing of course, but that's the same with a DSLR like my old D4, so I guess I'm just used to it. However, I did order a Z9 and I am looking forward to no blackout. It's gonna be wild! :)
Could you wave your left hand over the viewfinder while lifting it to active it prior to it coming up to your eye?
I tried that, but as you remove you hand it turns off. You'd have to keep your hand there all the way up to your eye, which is so cumbersome it defeat the purpose. :)
This channel is golden! I'm happy I found you 🙌
Thank you so much for the kind words!! We are posting a bit slowly now, but more is on the way! :)
Great video! FYI on raw file editing Capture One 21 as of now seems to do a better job with the Zii raw files especially in the shadow areas.
Thanks! And good tip. I really like my workflow, but I might consider trying Capture One. :)
Nice video!
Are you sure you're seeing F8 at F8? I've heard it stops at a certain point and goes down to size when you take the photo.
My 24-70 F4 does not get smaller after F 5.6. Unless you push the special button.
Ah, good point! I didn't double check this. So, perhaps it doesn't stop ALL the way down, but still when shooting with an f/1.4 lens, getting a live preview of the DOF up to f/5.6 is a huge help!
That you for raising this issue. I will test this! :)
That EVF aperture benefit is wow!
Yeah, I was surprised by how useful that is and it's not often talked about! :)
Very well presented. First video I’ve seen from you. Thank you
Thanks for watching! Most of our other videos are quite different: shooting out in the city. :)
ayyyyyyeee thats the combo i have... NIKON Z6II AND D4 #GANGGANG
Haha, great combo!! :)
HI EYExplore, Z6 II. iTTL doesnt work , i ttry up 3 flash guns. Any idea of why could hapend? They do work in the Z6 iTTL Any setting i have to change?
No idea. I'm not really an expert on flash. I use it only occasionally. But maybe try a factory reset of the settings (it's a pain, I know) as there might be some obscure setting that's causing the issue.
Nikon Z6ii is just the best camera!
I love it! :)
Just a thought: What about pressing shutter button half way? Will it turn on EVF? Any other button? Just asking, I don't own mirrorless camera yet.
Good question, but no it does not. It will, however, wake up the camera from standby mode. Standby can be completely disabled in the menu. But this is a deeper 'sleep' mode, not merely turning off the EVF. There is no option for the EVF to stay on unfortunately.
@@EYExplore sad a bit.
If I remember correctly adobe automatically applies certain correction to the Z6 and Z7 raw files when loading into lightroom. I believe they gave the option to turn it off.
Hmmm, intersting. I use Adobe Camera Raw, and the only option is the camera profile. On the D4, the Camera Standard profile was great, but on the Z6 it's okay sometimes, but I tend edit more often in the Adobe Standard profile. This is what I meant by quirks. It's nothing major! :)
Wonderful review. RE: battery life, my new Z 6ii, as well as my experience with my old Z 6, I get well over 1,000 images on a battery, and the battery is still like half full. I’ve never run out of 1 battery in a day. I’ve shot all day weddings, family sessions, events, etc. (The weddings I’m shooting more than 1 camera, so it’s not all on that 1 battery). Like you, I’ve found battery life to be a non issue.
Again, great review, thanks!
Glad to hear it! Especially with the grip, I've never run out both batteries in one session. This was something I was a bit worried about before I got the camera, but now it's a non-issue exactly as you say. :)
Great review. Thanks pal
Thanks for watching!! :)
Wicked photo , that city pic of the small truck
Thanks!! :)
Theyre a bit small , i was hoping the new cameras would be d850 size and choice of a chunky grip to fit us with larger hands , il stick to my d850s for now
That's why I got the grip. It's very comfortable, easily on par with my D4. :)
This was the exact video I’ve been looking for. I’ve been shooting a D810 for many years and I love it, but it’s time to add a new body to my lineup. The jump to mirrorless has been stressing me out so it’s nice to hear that you’ve had a good experience with it so far. The lag is concerning but I shoot primarily real estate so I feel like it would be less of an issue than with street photography. Really appreciate the information here and in your other videos.
Yes, and now it's been nearly 6 months and I'm still loving it. Did some street photography this morning and then a corporate portrait shoot after that. Overall, the camera killed it for both! That lag of the viewfinder turning on is the only annoying thing, but for the portrait shoot it was really a non-issue.
How does the FTZ ii work on the z6ii and f mount lenses?
Very well!! But I do think the AF is a bit faster on native Z mount lenses. It's just my anecdotal feeling. I never did any comprehensive tests. So, it could also just be my imagination. :)
Excellent video and just subscribed. I normally shoot wildlife with my D500 and although it's a great camera, at 68 , perhaps it's time to change. I like your no nonsense approach and appreciate you sharing :-)
Thanks for subscribing! the D500 is great for wildlife (so I hear) and since the Z6II is full frame you might miss some of the reach the smaller sensor offers.
I came from crop sensor and want to invest in full frame.
I'm confused between D850 and Z6II
For portraits and weddings which one should i choose?
I think the Z6II is better and high speed and low light shooting, which you may encounter during weddings. The D850 has more resolution and but that may not be useful unless intend to print large or crop a lot. The Z6II has better low light AF, by a large margin, in my experience.
@@EYExplore
Thanks for the suggestion.
Both cameras have a bis sensor.
@@rishabdam4228 BSI, yeah true but they are not the same sensor and are quite different from each other. Also the AF systems are completely different.
Thank you for the well-detailed discussion.
Glad you enjoyed it! :)
I just ordered 2x z6ii with battery grips to 'upgrade' my D4's, and having shot them the last 5 years i'm very very nervous about it!!!
That's a big plunge all at once! Why not do them one at a time? Honestly, you should see my more recent video about the Z9. I would rather have one Z9 than two Z6s. :)
Great information here! I guess we have to adapt with a new muscle memory at the Z6II: half press the shutter while bringing the cam to the eye hehe
Yeah that's for sure! But I do hope Nikon eventually solve this issue. I think using the accelerometer to detect when the camera is being lifted up would work for this!
Thanks. It is encouraging!👍🏾
Glad to hear it! :)
Very well thought out and presented. Thank you.
Thank you! Glad to hear that!
Have you completely abandoned the DSLR in favor of the Z6 II, or are you still shooting with the DSLR in some situations?
Yes, at this point my D4 is a memento in the closet. I plan on pulling out to do some videos for the channel, to kinda reminisce about it. But that would be the the only reason to use it these days. Also, I do now use a Z9 instead of a Z6II, which makes that decision even easier.
Have you ever tried "interval timer shooting" on the Z6II? My setting is A, auto ISO up to 51200, over 1000 shots. I have a random issue, first 10 to 20 photos are overexposed (totally white) then it shows exposure back to normal gradually.
I've not tried it but perhaps bracketing is engaged?
@@EYExplore No, bracketing is not engaged. If bracketing is engaged then it will happen every time I shoot. It happens to me once a while. Five, seven, ten times are ok then it happens once, two times...
@@HN-nu6ed Good point. Well that's a weird one. Unfortunately, I don't have any good advice for this problem.
What do you recommend regarding lenses? I am thinking about transitioning to a Z5 or Z6 from a D750. However, I don't have the ambition to swap out my whole kit right away (I mainly use primes). How do the older lenses perform with the adapter? If you do recommend discarding my lenses voor new lenses? If so, what's there to stop me from looking at other brands. Sony and Canon are a bit more 'mature' in the mirrorless world which might prove to be a solid alternative.
F-mount lenses work perfectly with the adapter. But the new Z lenses are very sharp also a bit lighter and smaller on average (especially when you factor in the adapter). I haven't gotten any Z lenses yet but I am looking forward to the 28mm and 40mm pancake lenses that Nikon plans to release this year.
If you're going to replace your entire kit, there is no general reason I can give for to stay with Nikon. It's a personal preference. I myself do not like the ergonomics of Sony's cameras. Canon is very good, but I don't see any major advantages, besides for video. And for me, the video capability of the Z6 is more than enough for my purposes.
One more thing: I would say the in the long run the Z system will have the best glass selection. Nikon's lenses are already excellent, and the very large mount and shot flange distance allow for some interesting lens designs apparently! :)
@@EYExplore Thanks! That is some good info. I was kind of hesitant because of the failure of the Nikon 1 lineup. I prefer Nikon as well but I'm also looking for something to build on in the coming years. Good to hear that you see a lot of green flags in transitioning to Nikon Z.
Can you try the X-E4?
Maybe some day. I'll have to rent one, so we'll see. :)
Doesn’t the Z6 II have a D750-sourced sensor, or is that the Z5?
I'm pretty sure the Z6 and Z7 have sensors developed specifically for them. I am not sure about the Z5. :)
Perfect explanation, many thanks 👍👍👍
Thanks! Glad you found it useful! :)
Did you ever tried canon R6 for example and why not? Thx
Never, because I'm happy with what I have and switching systems completely is not worth it for me. :)
@@EYExplore Ya. Understand that also from your videos. But I was wondering since i am starting to build from scratch if you maybe test them
@@_krakra_ Yeah, sorry I'm not much help. I only test gear that interests me OR if it's a sponsored content and the gear was sent to me.
@@EYExplore do you find nikon 40mm f2 plasticity due to plastic mount?
@@_krakra_ Not really. it makes little difference in the end. Although, if they ever made a fancy metal version that's also weather-sealed, I'd get it and easily pay double for it. But this one is fine. :)
Excellent video..Thank you...
Thank you! :)
Personally, I like it when I'm the one who decides where the focus should be, not the camera. If I have a dog running towards me, it is good if all the pictures are sharp, not just something single at the beginning and maybe something at the end.
Yeah, I agree. That's why I use single point tracking focus, which is called Subject Tracking on the Niko Z6II. I Nikon DSLRs I used 3D Tracking, which was recently brought back on the Z9. This is the best way to do AF for me in my use cases. :)
Why the z6 over the z7?
I really don't want so many megapickles! :) But seriously, I shoot a lot, and the data adds up. For most of what shoot, 24mp is easily enough for anything I need, even printing at A1 size, which I rarely do. The Z7's 45mp is overkill for me. However, sometimes I get client work that requires it. In this case I can just rent the Z6 or D850 as needed. :)
Great video and really informative. Thank you!
Thanks for watching!! :)
Really helpful, thank you.
My pleasure! :)
Great video dude
Thank you!! :)
Lol I went from a Sony A7 back to Nikon D3. I like the D3 much better for what I do
The D3 is a beast! And it can be had so cheap these days! Totally worth it! :)
Always enjoy to hear your take 🙏🏽📸
Thank you!!
Very good video, thanks..
Thank you for watching! :)
Link to your chair?
I bought at this store in Japan: www.nitori-net.jp/ec/product/6620418s/
But sure if it's internationally available. It's a very comfy chair! :)
On the d4 you can voice tag images and then send them via a Nikon transmitter connected to the camera, can the z6ii do voice tagging and allow sending from the camera to ftp servers?
Yeah, the voice tag feature is so cool! I don't think the Z6 can do such a thing. It's not meant to be a pro/flagship replacement.
@@EYExplore is the z8/9 for real then as a pro body?
@@amacmedia3221 I'm assuming they will come out with a Z9 or Z1 or something, yeah. We'll see. There are rumors it will be this year. :)
@@EYExplore Nikon seem so slow with mirrorless, it’s getting to the point where I’ll change to canon who have big tele lenses coming out to back up there coverage (800mm & 1200mm) with Nikon only going to 600mm, and still no pro body.
@@amacmedia3221 It depends what your needs are. If there is something the R5 has that you need, then by all means. For me the R5 + the cost of new glass is just too expensive to be worth it. But there is nothing the R5 has that I need for anything I do (at this time).
I'm action, sports wildlife areas & tried the Z6 &z7 mark ii cameras against my D5 and D6 cameras in areas from Athletics, Football, Formula 1,Motorbike racing. I FOUND the Z mount cameras focusing was crap & lost focusing numerous times on the Z6ii and Z7 ii in these environments. Z6 AND Z7 cameras maybe ok for other areas like architectural, portrait, product or street the Z6 and Z7 cameras are suitable. BUT SPORTS AREAS or Wildlife Photography the current Z mount cameras I wouldn't buy. Hopefully the pro mirrorless D6 version will come to light in 2021.
Fair enough. I have used the D5 extensively and found the Z6II to work just as well for me. It's true, I don't shoot sports per se, but there are things that move in my photography as well and the Z6II keeps up well in my experience (thought I haven't used the D5 is a long while so maybe I just don't remember).
I will say though that I wish they provided an option to make the focus point smaller. Sometimes it's just too big to be precise for photos where there is a lot of foreground clutter (like birds in a tree for example).
I've only tried the D6 in the store and was very impressed with the AF. I wouldn't be surprised if it was way better than the Z6, but that's a camera that costs 3-4 times as much, so it better be! I am also looking forward to a pro 'Z1' or something, hopefully this year.
I should add, I do think there is room for improvement in the AF system on the Z cameras, both in speed/accuracy and in usability.
You know, you comment got me to go out and try some more 'sporty' photographer, namely panning shots of cars on the streets. I admit, after many tests, the Z6 was not amazing at tracking, but it did a passable job. I can see how a D5 (and certainly a D6) is better. However, when it came to faces, in a comparison at the shop, the Z6 and D6 both did great. I will probably rent a D6 soon and give it a proper test. Thanks for the impetus! :)
@@EYExplore maybe a future comparison of dslr v mirrorless cameras in action, sports or other fast moving action under daylights or under floodlights or interior sports like basketball, equestrian indoor, rollerblading etc to see suitability of both formats
@@NikCan66 that's a good idea!! I don't know if I'll be able to swing indoor these days, but something outdoor for sure.
@@EYExplore something to aim for and to focus on
0:57 alright thanks , that’s all I came here for
Lol jk , as if I would ever not watch an Eyexplore video till the end 😂
Edit: 9:55 that shot is so crisp and amazing . Crazy that’s handheld at 1/2sec and only 500 iso
Hehe, thank you! Yeah that shot turned our amazing. I will say it did take a few tries. Not every photo was sharp. I would about 1/3 turned out slightly blurred. But that's still very good. I just held still and took 3 or 4 at a time. :)
Great video. PLEASE keep persuading everyone to go mirrorless so that the price of my favorite DLSRs drop and I can buy another one! HaHa.
Haha! :)
selling my D500 and D750 haha! :)
@@camilo8cheryl Nice!! :)
love that
Thanks! :)
more megapickles is really not a big dill for me to be honest
Me too! Which is why I didn't emphasize and joke about it. It's nice to have, but not why I got the camera.
@@EYExplore oh I was just making a pickle joke, Lukasz 🤣
@@anatomicshutter3975 Haha, I didn't read carefully. I just got it!! I love these kind of jokes. In Japan they call they 親父がぐ, which means 'old man jokes' but translates better as dad jokes, haha. :)
@@EYExplore Lol! Love that!
Ok, that made me laugh,
0:53 okay, that wins a like, subscribe, and watch from me.
Glad to hear my strategy worked! :)
Megapickles😂can not stop laughing. I think the only reason I would choose the Z6 over the D4 is because it makes a lot less noise and IBIS.
The IBIS was a huge reason for me! :)
And Fro knows photo will be disappointed he switched to Sony
Haha, well Sony is also good, I'm sure! You really can't go wrong with a camera in 2021. :)
Do you want to stay with a brick phone or a smart phone? C’mon. It’s obvious. Everything is better. Let’s just hope Nikon can be as successful as Sony & Canon.
I love the camera, but not everything is better. The EVF lag is still noticeable (on all of these cameras, from any maker), and it turns on too slowly when the proximity sensor detects your eye. Also, don't like how the subject tracking needs to be accessed with the push of an additional button. There are a few other things I don't like, albeit they are small.
I understand these relatively small things don't matter much, and when shooting for work it's a no-brainer to use a Z6II or Z7II as they offer many advantages despite nuisances. However, when shooting for pleasure I still enjoy my D4 immensely and overall I feel it's more fun to use than the Z6. And since many people who watch videos like this on UA-cam are NOT professionals, it warrants discussion.
Well said. To the streets!
Next video back on the streets as usual! :)
@@EYExplore Haha! I wasn’t complaining...I just LOVE your street photography and commentary as you shoot, especially since I’m using the z6ii now.
@@kevingoza Thank you so much! :)
Z for ZERO because that’s how many other camera systems Z mount lenses adapt to. The D780 is really two cameras in one… optical viewfinder and live view. For my collection of F mount (Fully Adaptable) lenses I can opt to carry the D780 or a Canon or a Sony or a Fujifilm body depending upon the task at hand. I don’t shoot video.
I don't really mention video in this video. I don't own other camera systems, so what does it matter if the lenses mount to other systems? I have four Z mount lenses that cover from 14mm to 200mm and that's all I need. With FTZ adapter I can use F-mount lenses. So what's the problem?
@@EYExplore It’s no problem if you believe Nikon will always have the best camera body to meet your needs (because Z mount lenses will not mount and infinity focus to any other system) AND you also don’t own any screw drive AF/AF-D lenses… for many folks one or both of these conditions are not true so the better choice is to stick with the best DSLR that meets your needs be it D780 or D850 or whatever. Not everyone has sponsors or an unlimited budget. There are no equivalents of the 105/2 DC nor 135/2 DC in Z mount yet and probably never will be unless $$,$$$ kind of pricing. If Nikon doesn’t survive the coming recession (that risk is rising not falling) then an investment in Z glass will be pretty much worthless unless one decides to ride a dead system into the ground. I will change my view on the Z system if Nikon produces a native FTZ-AF screw drive adapter and high quality native infinity focus adapters to mount Z glass on other systems. Until then for me, and for many long time F mount users, it’s no bueno. And I haven’t even talked about the price, size, weight and build quality advantages of many F mount lenses compared to their Z siblings.
@@bradl2636 I don't have sponsors lol. You think Nikon gave me this stuff? Also, I have a limited budget too. If the Nikon cameras eventually do suck to the point that I don't want to use them (unlikely) then I'll just sell everything and move on. Right now, the camera is great, so I see no problem in investing in their great lenses. If you're so risk averse about 'dead' systems then just stick to Canon or Sony. I agree that Z mount lenses are expensive, but for wieght and size, many are better. I upgraded my F mount 14-24 and 24-70 and both a lighter, smaller, and have improve optical quality (not that the F mount ones were bad or anything). Anyway, you do you, but I just can't really see your 'fear change' perspective. I'm very glad Nikon is trying something new, embracing new technology, and not trying to adhere to a 60 year old standard that is F-mount.
@@EYExplore I apologise I’m not trying to make a personal attack on you my comments are intended to apply generally to highlight specific scenario mainly for legacy F shooters. The 24-70/4 Z sounds like a great option over its F equivalent by all accounts on multiple factors that include the size, weight, construction quality, price and of course IQ. In the case of 50/1.8 Z (for example) though not so much IMHO… in fact my 50/1.8D is stuck on the other side of the planet and I ran out of patience a few weeks ago purchased a replacement brand new in the box for about $72. Just one example of where the F to Z switch value proposition is just isn’t there. Anyway keep up the good work I don’t live in Japan anymore but so many places in your walks are very familiar to me.
@@bradl2636 I'm sorry too, I'm not trying to get into a heated argument. I respect your opinion fully! I guess all I'm saying is that I also had bunch of F mount lenses and recently replaced them all, though they were mostly the main zooms. I do agree that the 1.8 primes are quite pricey, and I myself have no picked them up. However, I did recently the 40mm f/2 and I am blown away with the IQ from a 300 dollar lens (though the build quality is not amazing, but you get what you pay for). Also, Nikon did recently release a 28-75mm f/2.8, which looks like a pretty good budget option over the 24-70mm f/2.8, thought I haven't tried it yet myself. I think they will eventually release more budget primes, but we'll see.
Look Morty, Mega Pickles
Haha, when I was editing Chica was like "are you going to turn yourself into a pickle?!"
Silent shutter sounds like a gimmick. Never once in 15 years using DSLR's I get scolded for a noisy shutter... none!.
I agree, but sometimes when I cover events, I do feel a bit annoying with my loud-ass shutter. I'm sure most people tune it out and don't care, so it's just my own self-consciousness. In any case, I agree it's not that important.
what battery clip do you use on your nikon z6ii
The one that Nikon offers. I think it's the MB-N11. :)
@@EYExplore thanks