'Jellyfish' stumps UFO experts | Banfield

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 сер 2024
  • UFO journalist Jeremy Corbell has released footage of what he is calling a “jellyfish” UAP spotted in Iraq in 2018. NewsNation has not independently verified this footage. UFO expert Nick Pope joins "Banfield" to discuss.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @maddogmorgan8737
    @maddogmorgan8737 7 місяців тому +187

    The "jellyfish" ufo spotted by hundreds of people over Russia and Europe in 1977 was also described as being translucent or see through.

    • @rooster1012
      @rooster1012 7 місяців тому +1

      I call B.S. The Empire Strikes Back did not come out until 1980 and this is clearly an Imperial Probe Droid.

    • @visitante-pc5zc
      @visitante-pc5zc 7 місяців тому +1

      It wanst spotted anywhere. This is government bullshit to distract us from huge price inflation and socialism

    • @albertobenevenuto77
      @albertobenevenuto77 7 місяців тому +12

      That is just a US army emblem balloon. It is funny how people wants to belive

    • @RedLineShortFilms
      @RedLineShortFilms 7 місяців тому +60

      ​​@@albertobenevenuto77A balloon that goes underwater and then goes up 28 000ft in less than a second? Damn, these balloons are getting advanced!

    • @DanniDuck
      @DanniDuck 7 місяців тому +22

      @@albertobenevenuto77 Yes, it's a balloon that just floats without going up or down. Very logical, sir.

  • @mog1784
    @mog1784 7 місяців тому +129

    I would love to see the 17 minute video

    • @garylee3893
      @garylee3893 7 місяців тому

      There's 2 verified marines that have been youtubed that have seen the full 17 minutes, contrary to Corbells extordinary claim of submerging and re emerging ,then sky rocketing into space, No. Didn't happen, this is a floating object. Floating as in helium filled something. The hanging down parts are weights! To assure not reaching unseeable heights, I guarantee it. Which way was the air current that night in that area of Iraq, research, I believe, but this aint nothing

    • @rolandwoltman7835
      @rolandwoltman7835 7 місяців тому +6

      It's a dude in a jet-suit that is also submersible. DARPA finally showing us some of what they're developing me thinks.

    • @80sShred
      @80sShred 7 місяців тому +5

      ​@rolandwoltman7835
      😂😂. Yeah Darpa is using jellyfish camo now.

    • @nellsonogmore5938
      @nellsonogmore5938 7 місяців тому

      Do you know how loud a jet suit is? It flies past a pack of dogs and they don't even blink. @@rolandwoltman7835

    • @itslocane412
      @itslocane412 7 місяців тому +6

      @@rolandwoltman7835 Debunked.
      The object couldn't be seen in night vision, and thermal wasn't capturing any heat, also eye witnesses said there was no noise either.

  • @WryOldFox
    @WryOldFox 7 місяців тому +72

    Wow...these UAP sightings sure are getting weird. Nick Pope is right to ask 'Whats next?'

    • @thelastdragon5551
      @thelastdragon5551 7 місяців тому +13

      If not a hoax, a smudge on the lense or anything man-made, what could it be? This sighting is absolutely interesting. Many would point to aliens (again, not anything I just mentioned) but what if it’s an energy that has been around us forever and avoided real detection? What is it that we don’t know in this universe or beyond? I sure hope to get some sort of reveal or explanation before I pass on.

    • @visitante-pc5zc
      @visitante-pc5zc 7 місяців тому

      It is a hoax. Government distraction

    • @JayTalksinjury
      @JayTalksinjury 7 місяців тому +4

      ​@thelastdragon5551 smudge the lens and it's the fella with the flying jet pack you see doin demo's everywhere...

    • @Group_Anonymous
      @Group_Anonymous 7 місяців тому

      tired of these ufo grifters/shills.. at the end of the day its all about book sales for them

    • @thelastdragon5551
      @thelastdragon5551 7 місяців тому +2

      @@JayTalksinjury Sorry but you sound ridiculous if you’re saying someone with a jetpack.

  • @ComfortablyNumbBIYD33
    @ComfortablyNumbBIYD33 7 місяців тому +49

    When these things start physically engaging with us, we should worry.
    They’re just playing peek-a-boo for now.

    • @dustywilson5461
      @dustywilson5461 7 місяців тому +11

      They're probably scanning for all sorts of data, likely for reconnaissance.

    • @desertweasel6965
      @desertweasel6965 7 місяців тому

      What if the bible is right and they are actually supernatural demons? Perhaps they are always right here, just in another dimension. They can see us, but we can't see them. They just aimlessly roam around until the time comes for them to be revealed to humanity. They'll know the time has come by human reaction. One day, they will suddenly see us screaming and running in terror. They will then know the time is here, because they will finally know that we can see them.

    • @Rubbe87
      @Rubbe87 7 місяців тому

      I had that happen a long time ago in 2012 plenty of people getting alien abducted but they wont talk about it due the public being programed for decades to mock the subject.

    • @rastabg23
      @rastabg23 7 місяців тому +7

      they've been "physically engaging" with humans since human conception.

    • @Rubbe87
      @Rubbe87 7 місяців тому

      Its a combination of all above. @@spankyspork5808

  • @TheBeddaMan
    @TheBeddaMan 7 місяців тому +12

    It’s an Imperial Probe Droid. It’s a good bet the Empire knows we’re here.

  • @didicoy72
    @didicoy72 7 місяців тому +84

    I never would've guessed that the flying spaghetti monster was real.

    • @Mike_Davidson
      @Mike_Davidson 7 місяців тому +4

      It is real. A real ballon disguised to look like a flying Jellyfish. 🤣🤣🤣🎈

    • @nickfanzo
      @nickfanzo 7 місяців тому

      @@Mike_Davidsonballoons aren’t invisible to the naked eye and night vision.
      That right there disproves balloon theories.
      Did you see the interviews with the congressmen after the briefing? Maybe that will change your mind a bit.

    • @a-walpatches6460
      @a-walpatches6460 7 місяців тому +6

      All hail His noodley goodness!

    • @nickfanzo
      @nickfanzo 7 місяців тому +1

      @@a-walpatches6460 may not be a good thing, may have bad intentions, who knows.

    • @a-walpatches6460
      @a-walpatches6460 7 місяців тому +5

      @@nickfanzo Read your scripture, the noodley scripture. Join the church of the flying spaghetti monster and repent for you sins. Only way to be saved.

  • @DanMcGrathDotNet
    @DanMcGrathDotNet 7 місяців тому +19

    It's bird poop on the dome that covers a swiveling camera. Does It's aspect ever change, to indicate a 3D object turning? No. Does it ever pass behind anything? No.

    • @petermueller7407
      @petermueller7407 7 місяців тому +3

      Spot on

    • @8TommyZ06
      @8TommyZ06 7 місяців тому +3

      Exactly. To me, this is ruining the credibility of actual evidence.

    • @elvismorales7741
      @elvismorales7741 7 місяців тому

      And I thought it was another Gospel truth type story by the magnificent Corbel.

    • @DanMcGrathDotNet
      @DanMcGrathDotNet 7 місяців тому

      @@8TommyZ06 Almost seems like mockery.

    • @rundmk00
      @rundmk00 7 місяців тому

      it does change, at times you see it more front on and as it goes by you see it more side on, could be bug splatter or bird dirt on a glass dome but also could be something else

  • @murrygondwana7260
    @murrygondwana7260 7 місяців тому +23

    It is clearly an Imperial Probe Droid searching for the Rebel Alliance base.

  • @youchris67
    @youchris67 7 місяців тому +39

    At the start of the video, you can clearly see structure in this object. Looks like a flying Optimus Prime.

    • @wesrm1
      @wesrm1 7 місяців тому +5

      Or the Imperial probe droid at the beginning of The Empire Strikes Back.

    • @iniquity123
      @iniquity123 7 місяців тому +1

      And Optimus Prime is real ......

  • @360Fov
    @360Fov 7 місяців тому +16

    Why is the alleged footage of it going into and out of water not released?

    • @jamescarter8311
      @jamescarter8311 7 місяців тому

      Because it doesn't exist because it's bird crap.

    • @whosle
      @whosle 7 місяців тому

      There is footage also showing it turn 10000x bigger and it also filed my taxes for me!

    • @bobbywilliams1823
      @bobbywilliams1823 7 місяців тому

      It's on Benny Johnsons channel. Shows it going out over the ocean. Never saw it go under tho

    • @whosle
      @whosle 7 місяців тому

      @@bobbywilliams1823 it shows another blurry dark object zoomed out, why isn’t there a in between video? It’s a balloon at best or bird feces at worse.

    • @melxb
      @melxb 7 місяців тому +2

      because there isn't any, it's just bird poop on camera lens

  • @bodaciousbiker
    @bodaciousbiker 7 місяців тому +14

    I'm sorry, but IMO Nick Pope is someone who has been zigzagging all over the UAP map for years. Both a fence sitter extraordinaire and a postulator of extreme theories, he seems to effortlessly reconfigure his 'spots' for whatever news outlet or History Channel show he appears on. Yes, he did preside over the UK's MoD 'UFO desk' for three years, essentially responding to media and parliamentary enquiries about the phenomenon, but regarding him as a UAP 'investigator' and the 'go to' person on this topic is a bit like handing Prince Harry the 'Living Legends of Aviation' award. Even in this six-and-a-half-minute piece, he went from stating that he leaned towards this being Chinese rather than 'Martian' to later admitting that Russia and China are seeing these things as well. Let's face it, if either Russia or China possess technology that is 'invisible' in the visible spectrum (night vision) yet shows up in IR, can jam optical targeting systems, can display positive lift without any propulsion signature and can seemingly fly over our 'secure' facilities with impunity, then we have a much bigger problem than just UAPs!

    • @zackc3368
      @zackc3368 7 місяців тому

      He will still be tied to secrets act so won't be able to "confirm or deny". He does know more about the subject than he says and the whole it's Russia or China can just be seen as deflection, a way of changing the subject or moving on without giving anything away.
      We know him in the UK, he is legit and is legally still held to secrets act.
      If/when something gets declassified, he will openly talk about it more

    • @Unleach77
      @Unleach77 7 місяців тому +5

      Totally agree 👍💯

    • @bodystomp5302
      @bodystomp5302 7 місяців тому +2

      Agree.

    • @cmiltimore470
      @cmiltimore470 7 місяців тому

      yup, the guy is a shipdit, constantly changing his opinions...

    • @joshx9746
      @joshx9746 7 місяців тому

      Yeah, and Nick Pope doesn't claim to be an expert. He just gives his opinion.

  • @aic5073
    @aic5073 7 місяців тому +8

    No matter what it is, we know now that David Grusch must be telling the truth. At least, that is what the U.S. senators are saying after yesterday's skiff meeting.

    • @JamesWatheist
      @JamesWatheist 7 місяців тому

      Absolutely, the inspector general was able to tell the members of Congress why he determined David Grush was credible, why he believes he was telling the truth in his complaint.
      These are not all birds and balloons. They aren't super secret us government technology. They aren't super secret technology from other nations. None of those fit anymore.
      Reality is about to get a lot stranger than we previously believed.

    • @bodystomp5302
      @bodystomp5302 7 місяців тому

      I have no idea if Grusch’s statements represent accurate testimony from those who approached him with information, but I believe 100% Grusch didn’t suddenly decide to end his career and risk prison time to propagate a bullshit story.

  • @ComfortablyNumbBIYD33
    @ComfortablyNumbBIYD33 7 місяців тому +26

    For a second there I swear it looked like it has horns.

    • @raulp9171
      @raulp9171 7 місяців тому +1

      That is precisely what I was thinking.. As odd as it gets.

    • @pjsebadoh5412
      @pjsebadoh5412 7 місяців тому +2

      ​@@raulp9171😮 I don't like it... I wonder if we tried to take it down... ya know, like..
      BRRRRRRRAAAP!! (A-10 warthog)

    • @Roset03
      @Roset03 7 місяців тому +4

      For a second there I thought it looked like bird sh*t. Actually, for all the seconds there.... :I

    • @wesrm1
      @wesrm1 7 місяців тому +1

      Or pointy ears on the round head like some kind of flying goblin.

    • @evonne315
      @evonne315 7 місяців тому +4

      It seriously looks like a muppet-alien- devil- poodle- jellyfish.

  • @trinireader6289
    @trinireader6289 7 місяців тому +38

    Are we to think that in this era of technology that we cannot make these blurred images clear?

    • @RandomRoulett3
      @RandomRoulett3 7 місяців тому +6

      you'll never be satisfied

    • @G0ALAXY9
      @G0ALAXY9 7 місяців тому +6

      You get the blurry, they keep the clear.

    • @AAE-cg1il
      @AAE-cg1il 7 місяців тому

      The common cel phone can get clearer images…….What we are witnessing is the next government money grab. Global warming isn’t working………

    • @Terrorvidcom
      @Terrorvidcom 7 місяців тому +7

      That thing was not visible by human eye or a conventional camera like your phone camera.

    • @tblends
      @tblends 7 місяців тому +1

      Yep, every single one. That is the problem. Skeptical , open-minded, but still on the fence after watching every "proof" video that exists...

  • @pauldutchy8506
    @pauldutchy8506 7 місяців тому +18

    0:28 This is part of jellyfish uap report:
    EVENT DESCRIPTION-An incursion by an object of unknown origin was
    filmed at a United States joint operations base in Irag. The object was
    designated UAP (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena), and was tracked
    for a durational period. The object moved through a sensitive military
    installation- and eventually traversed over a body of water, where it
    actuated a controlled descent- submerging into the water. After an
    observational period of about seventeen minutes - the UAP reemerged
    from the body of water and shot-off at an extreme rate of speed-
    beyond the optical scope of the observation platform. The origin, intent
    and capability of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle remains unknown.
    official designation remains UAP.

    • @Mike_Davidson
      @Mike_Davidson 7 місяців тому +2

      Which body of water and what was the name of the base? 🤷🏻‍♂️🤣🤣🤣🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @shoDOHC
      @shoDOHC 7 місяців тому +1

      those are the facts, folks.

    • @Mike_Davidson
      @Mike_Davidson 7 місяців тому +2

      @@shoDOHC According to who from what military base? 🤷🏻‍♂️😂😂😂

    • @shoDOHC
      @shoDOHC 7 місяців тому +1

      @@Mike_Davidson according to Jeremy Corbells connection in the military. Why don't you do some research on it

    • @Mike_Davidson
      @Mike_Davidson 7 місяців тому +1

      @@shoDOHC i’ve done plenty of research and all I find is a “Iraq” or “military base in Iraq”. Now why is that? 🤷🏻‍♂️😂😂😂

  • @tanagra2
    @tanagra2 7 місяців тому +19

    I would love to know the wind direction, I mean is it just literally blowing in the wind. If it’s heading into wind I will be so much more interested

    • @yohanbeck8172
      @yohanbeck8172 7 місяців тому +3

      Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra. HIS EYES CLOSED

    • @telesniper2
      @telesniper2 7 місяців тому +2

      plastic bag

    • @TheBanana93
      @TheBanana93 7 місяців тому +4

      Literally looks like a sheet of plastic floating in the wind lol

    • @Mike_Davidson
      @Mike_Davidson 7 місяців тому +2

      It’s a ballon and those hanging tentacles are its ballast so it holds its altitude. 🤣🤣🤣🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @zackc3368
      @zackc3368 7 місяців тому +1

      Apparently it dips into the water and then 17 minutes later comes back out and moves off again but much faster.
      And remember, this is a military camera that is heat sensitive, the object would not go from black (solid) to see through (transparent) unless the object suddenly changed in temperature.
      Metal, plastic bags, drones etc do NOT do that

  • @misterslats
    @misterslats 7 місяців тому +61

    No one is gonna buy into this video until we see it dive into the water and out 17 minutes later. THAT is wildly fantastic! Why didn't Jeremy release the full-length video. Until the part of the video with it's water plunge is released all the peeps saying it's a drone are going to bleet on endlessy. Do drones NOT show up on night vision? Because this didn't. Are drones invisible in the regular light spectrum? Because this was? Can a drone plunge into water, stay submerged for 17 minutes then launch into the sky at hyper speed? Cuz this apparently did.

    • @Tom6567my
      @Tom6567my 7 місяців тому +11

      Not really. There are tons of videos of UAPS doing just that. Even with that people still aren't satisfied.

    • @thelastdragon5551
      @thelastdragon5551 7 місяців тому +9

      Not sure why Jeremy keeps drip feeding us this stuff.

    • @thelastdragon5551
      @thelastdragon5551 7 місяців тому +8

      @@Tom6567my It would make this sighting much more believable if we see those parts.

    • @kahanasam
      @kahanasam 7 місяців тому +1

      Right on!

    • @superbwater78
      @superbwater78 7 місяців тому

      Yeah right, people are never satisfied. Even if it showed that people would still say it was a balloon, or a drone or black tech. Columbus wrote in his diary that he saw a light going up and down in the middle of the Ocean. This was in the freaking 1400's. People are in denial. Period.

  • @jaq8604
    @jaq8604 7 місяців тому +5

    There’s a lot of information attached to this object than what is being talked about here, and also more public footage. In the TMZ series where this footage was just revealed, it was said that the object was only visible in the thermal spectrum, and no sensors could lock onto it or something like that. Also, it had a very strange sort of armor on it, interacted with water (shown in the documentary) and also moved in whatever strange ways. Definitely very interesting.

    • @charliestyle575
      @charliestyle575 7 місяців тому

      Yep, it submerged into water for 17min then shot up 2800 feet into the air before radar lost it. They couldn't get a radar lock on it either. Drone? Hell no! It's time people start realizing we are not alone in this universe. I'm very curious to know what all was spoken about in the recent skif meeting behind closed doors. I do know Jeremy Corbel had mentioned more men who were employees for reverse engineering UAP/UFO showed up to confirm David Grusch's claims.

    • @theharshtruthoutthere
      @theharshtruthoutthere 7 місяців тому

      To all who are amazed by the trickery known as: U. F .O s
      Ain`t It more logic that:
      UFO = government spying? Or their project BLUE BEAM?
      They are:
      Greedy for money and hungry for power , wanting to be omnipresent. Agreed so far?

    • @deerfeeder2076
      @deerfeeder2076 7 місяців тому

      Seriously put this into slow motion and high resolution then watch it around @2:24. You can see the big gray alien head, then if you see that you'll see the bipedal body in a 'riding' position like a person riding a fast street bike. That's a gray.

  • @Yewbzee
    @Yewbzee 7 місяців тому +1

    Really appreciate the sensible and grown up line of questioning here, well done.

  • @streamtabulous
    @streamtabulous 7 місяців тому +5

    The intelligence officer that released the jellyfish said they have footage of the same type (he called it the spaghetti monster) over adversaries in other countries, but he cant give that footage as it is sensitive as in would let that country know we have eyes on, ASK Jeremy.
    IT IS NOT ONLY OVER US BASES

  • @hamzterix
    @hamzterix 7 місяців тому +21

    Nick Pope have nothing else to add, always. What an interesting fella.

  • @RichardCordell101
    @RichardCordell101 7 місяців тому +6

    In this context, the only threat to any country’s national security is non-disclosure.

  • @bownage
    @bownage 7 місяців тому +3

    In 1990 in Alfena, Portugal there was a mass daytime sighting of a similar type of tentacle UFO. There were also pictures taken and dozens of witnesses.

  • @thesaneparty4079
    @thesaneparty4079 7 місяців тому +5

    An obvious question no one's answering is whether the object was traveling on the wind. Clearly, if it's making progress against a crosswind it's a totally different scenario than a balloon with the wind.

    • @aboveyou686
      @aboveyou686 7 місяців тому +2

      True but it was seen going under water and shoot up.. wind wouldn’t explain that

    • @thesaneparty4079
      @thesaneparty4079 7 місяців тому

      But curiously no video of that@@aboveyou686

    • @JamesWatheist
      @JamesWatheist 7 місяців тому +1

      Balloons appear in the optical band, this thing, whatever it was, couldn't be seen optically. Some kind of cloaking technology far more advanced than us.

    • @ralphholiman7401
      @ralphholiman7401 7 місяців тому

      I'm sure that it is the one thing the intelligence analyst and tracker operators never thought of when they were trying to figure it out.

    • @thesaneparty4079
      @thesaneparty4079 7 місяців тому

      This is nonsense designed to distract from Epstein and leftist show trials against Trump, so no.@@ralphholiman7401

  • @PrivateAccountXSG
    @PrivateAccountXSG 7 місяців тому +5

    That is clearly Cogsworth from Fallout 4....

  • @davehurst3136
    @davehurst3136 7 місяців тому +3

    This has already been picked to pieces. The whole thing about it going into the water and flying out of the water at a high rate of speed is a giant nothing burger

  • @darstar217
    @darstar217 7 місяців тому +2

    I don’t like talking about ufos as if they’re fundamentally unexplainable and we can never understand them. Even if they are extraterrestrial, there should be a logically consistent explanation for them. The idea that an advanced civilization out there has a more complete understanding of physics that enables them to travel faster than light and they’re here studying us for science seems logical to me.

    • @stewstube70
      @stewstube70 7 місяців тому +1

      Agreed.

    • @theotheleo6830
      @theotheleo6830 7 місяців тому

      But we can't explain them until we understand the physics.

    • @darstar217
      @darstar217 7 місяців тому

      @@theotheleo6830 but that doesn’t mean we can never explain them ever because they’re magic, which is how I take it when I hear the word unexplainable.

    • @theotheleo6830
      @theotheleo6830 7 місяців тому +1

      @@darstar217 Unexplainable with current knowledge.

  • @brian-g4dvb384
    @brian-g4dvb384 7 місяців тому

    So - this viewing lasted over 17 minutes over a military airforce base and nobody scrabbled a jet fighter - absolutely unbelievable !!!!

  • @user-zy2kc3lh9j
    @user-zy2kc3lh9j 7 місяців тому +3

    Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is at it again and flying strong.

    • @VeraxMusic
      @VeraxMusic 7 місяців тому

      Yep, my boy just flying through, no care in the world.

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 7 місяців тому

      FSM looks a bit disappointing. Must be the heat.

  • @NicholasMGlasson
    @NicholasMGlasson 7 місяців тому +13

    I captured a flying disc thing on my phone in NZ recently - It's on my channel for anyone who wants to see! local news and experts couldn't identify it either!

    • @steelstreet3765
      @steelstreet3765 7 місяців тому +1

      What park of Nz? I am in Christchurch 😮

    • @cobblerama
      @cobblerama 7 місяців тому +5

      I checked your video out. It is interesting but does kind of look like a mylar balloon being carried by the wind.

    • @andreshernandez1180
      @andreshernandez1180 7 місяців тому

      I caught a few too, check them out.

  • @stewstube70
    @stewstube70 7 місяців тому +2

    The main reason the US military are recording these things more frequently than others is simply because they are the largest and most active global military nation and they have the most sensors and cameras to record these things.

    • @jesperpedersen3430
      @jesperpedersen3430 7 місяців тому

      Aaaand…. obvious targets for Russian and Chinese spy attacks.. What advanced secret spy technology is the US currently using in those countries that we don’t know about either?

  • @Phoenix-vg8li
    @Phoenix-vg8li 7 місяців тому +2

    It’s a goddamn flying, spaghetti monster

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 7 місяців тому

      Not exactly what I expected my idol to look like.

  • @ShayJ777
    @ShayJ777 7 місяців тому +8

    I ❤ News Nation. Such interesting, insightful programs unlike other news on tv.

  • @kctechie
    @kctechie 7 місяців тому +3

    Odd how it never once altered its position relative to the camera. Angle, and relative position never changed once. It almost seems 2 dimensional.

    • @Flashbang250
      @Flashbang250 7 місяців тому +1

      Cause it's a smudge

    • @kctechie
      @kctechie 7 місяців тому

      ​@@Flashbang250rewatched it and i think that is the perfect explanation. I've figured out a few, reflections of recessed lights on glass, a balloon, but i hadn't figured that one out even though i felt it obviously wasn't a uap/ufo. Good call!

  • @wreckedentry9515
    @wreckedentry9515 7 місяців тому +4

    does anyone doubt the existence of these things now? I honestly can't grasp that someone can seriously not believe at this point...

    • @andreshernandez1180
      @andreshernandez1180 7 місяців тому +2

      It would almost seem as if cavemen who painted UFOs and beings wearing helmets weren’t trolling the people of the future with an elaborate prank after all 🤔

    • @JamesWatheist
      @JamesWatheist 7 місяців тому +2

      The skepticism dies hard. They are looking at a buffet fully stocked with crow and hoping someone or something comes to their rescue before they have to start eating.

    • @semi-mojo
      @semi-mojo 7 місяців тому

      What does the video entail? Flying jellyfish aliens? Or a drone covered in camouflage/debris. It could be ANYTHING, but most probably a human construction.

    • @kygodragon4782
      @kygodragon4782 7 місяців тому

      Bro give up
      Aliens walked with us at a mall last week, the news told us it didn't happen
      A ufo flys above us in sight, the news told us it's the Chinese
      Aliens would litearrly have to scream in our faces "WE ARE ALIENS" for people to believe...

    • @JamesWatheist
      @JamesWatheist 7 місяців тому

      @@semi-mojo We don't have cloaking devices. Something man made is going to show up in the optical as well as the thermal.

  • @Peter7966
    @Peter7966 7 місяців тому +7

    I like the flying spaghetti monster take.

    • @chaosdweller
      @chaosdweller 7 місяців тому

      Haha

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 7 місяців тому

      I would have expected my idol to be... more articulated.

  • @stargazer4625
    @stargazer4625 7 місяців тому +4

    Good to see Nick 👍👍

  • @deesnutz42069
    @deesnutz42069 7 місяців тому +8

    just kinda looks like a drone with some garbage on it.

    • @eucliduschaumeau8813
      @eucliduschaumeau8813 7 місяців тому +1

      Bingo.

    • @thelastdragon5551
      @thelastdragon5551 7 місяців тому

      Maybe I haven’t seen any deep analysis of the object but to me it looks pretty much 2D. Other then the color shifting, I’m trying to see if it has volume. Can’t see it.

  • @josephrapp
    @josephrapp 7 місяців тому +2

    It has two ears,a head,chest and legs........some UFO!!! LOL

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 7 місяців тому

      At least it's symmetric (kind of), so I won't get bad dreams.

  • @LeafEater607
    @LeafEater607 7 місяців тому

    If you zoom into in on the object you can see some of the tentacles move slightly individually. Pretty neat.

  • @thelonelyghosts9004
    @thelonelyghosts9004 7 місяців тому +8

    So if it’s adversarial, how do they get it to “disappear”? The guys that were there said they couldn’t see it with their eyes but could on radar

    • @Check_This_Game-f5m
      @Check_This_Game-f5m 7 місяців тому +2

      They operate in different light spectrum.

    • @stewpot6998
      @stewpot6998 7 місяців тому

      Banfield is afraid of aliens.

  • @bradleyswaney6100
    @bradleyswaney6100 7 місяців тому +4

    What i witnessed way back in 1987 was damn sure, not China or Russia. 😂
    Got 30 feet from it. Nick. Always the gov man. 😅

  • @user-wo9yr8td1x
    @user-wo9yr8td1x 7 місяців тому

    People are so easily decieved, your government understands this more than anybody, geez.

  • @xristos2141981
    @xristos2141981 7 місяців тому

    He is an ex minister of defence in U.K now he is an investigator with enough known incidents to his ministry

  • @Dina_tankar_mina_ord
    @Dina_tankar_mina_ord 7 місяців тому +2

    I have been attempting to identify any discernible 3D-like shape in this object. Even when the black and white values change, the profile remains static, unaffected by camera movement. This suggests to me that it is more likely a stain on a camera lens than anything else. Additionally, the crosshair movement gives the impression of being from another camera capturing the original feed. Does anyone else observe any changes in the silhouette's profile?

    • @luciddream2033
      @luciddream2033 7 місяців тому

      The camera focuses on it at certain points. If it were a stain, the camera could never focus on it. If it did, everything in the background would immediately go out of focus. That doesn't seem to happen. There is definitely something there in the air.

    • @patrickunderwood5662
      @patrickunderwood5662 7 місяців тому

      Good question, I was going to say the same thing. Doesn’t seem to be any change in aspect. Which means the camera must be extremely distant (which is improbable), or the image is manipulated, or the “object” is an image artifact. I’d love to believe, but…

    • @jakeman025
      @jakeman025 7 місяців тому

      If it was a stain then it would be in the same location on the picture however you can see it move around from center via the reticule.

    • @stadex4203
      @stadex4203 7 місяців тому

      I saw a video on another channel where they zoomed in and it looked like a person wearing a suit.

    • @Dina_tankar_mina_ord
      @Dina_tankar_mina_ord 7 місяців тому

      @@stadex4203 interesting. can you link it I really want all the reference I can get. :)

  • @petermueller7407
    @petermueller7407 7 місяців тому +4

    This is just a spot on a window. This is ridiculous and discredits our UAP efforts!

    • @andycarter1089
      @andycarter1089 7 місяців тому +1

      Yeah I can't see anything other than birdpoop or a splatted bug on the lens! - it just doesn't feel legit, unlike something like the TicTac

    • @petermueller7407
      @petermueller7407 7 місяців тому

      @@andycarter1089 agreed

    • @zackc3368
      @zackc3368 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@andycarter1089bird poo that changes color 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
      Bird poo that is only visible in IR 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @andycarter1089
      @andycarter1089 7 місяців тому

      @@zackc3368 I'd feel differently about it if someone said they saw it with their actual eyes and not this footage, if there was some sort of other sensor data or video from a completely separate camera so there was a different angle to it.
      Otherwise all I can see is gunk here

    • @foooooob
      @foooooob 7 місяців тому

      Look closely. It seems to be that we have two creatures here. One holding a smaller one. Pause the video in the very begining.

  • @truthisoutthere6721
    @truthisoutthere6721 7 місяців тому +1

    Nick pope is such a genius that he can’t tell what bird shit on a camera cover looks like???

  • @gottagoat
    @gottagoat 7 місяців тому

    What really upsets the military is that crop circles happen on bases and theres nothing they can do about it, they still dont know who their made, its not two drunk guys with boards

  • @eurandicorvelloantunesdeol5392
    @eurandicorvelloantunesdeol5392 7 місяців тому +3

    the aliens must see us as a case study in how a super aggressive species manages to fight with itself and destroy the entire planet in the process.

    • @aic5073
      @aic5073 7 місяців тому

      Or they wish they could experience what it is to be human. They could be emotionless beings incapable of laughter and joy. They could come here to visit their creations too

  • @kristijensen7457
    @kristijensen7457 7 місяців тому +8

    Makes me think that we have a sentient, intelligent, technologically advanced species living in our oceans. We make vehicles to go onto their dimension. Makes sense they’d make some to come into ours.

    • @thelastdragon5551
      @thelastdragon5551 7 місяців тому +2

      Intelligent beings living in our oceans is a fascinating theory that is completely believable to me.

    • @TheBadBunny87
      @TheBadBunny87 7 місяців тому

      It is very hard to become technologically advanced in water. You need heat to create even the most basic building blocks of technology. Fire and water don't mix.
      They're capable of going into the ocean. Probably a sustained visit but very unlikely that's where they're from.

    • @raptorman48
      @raptorman48 7 місяців тому

      It's probably China!

    • @_Just_V_
      @_Just_V_ 7 місяців тому +1

      @@TheBadBunny87so you’re saying it’s impossible to light a match in a submarine? 😂

    • @TheBadBunny87
      @TheBadBunny87 7 місяців тому

      @@_Just_V_ In a submarine you're not in the water. The submarine is. Swim outside the submarine and try to light a match! 🤦

  • @louisroth5941
    @louisroth5941 7 місяців тому +1

    It’s the Pokémon Nihiligo 😂

  • @nova396
    @nova396 7 місяців тому +1

    Looks like a drone with foliage draped over it, so when it lands it is camouflaged. Simple.

  • @angelscry2323
    @angelscry2323 7 місяців тому +3

    Nick Pope said it must be China or Russia.. 🙄 come on man really 🤦‍♂️

    • @panthergod
      @panthergod 7 місяців тому

      The UK globalist Warmonger propaganda is pathetic.

    • @raptorman48
      @raptorman48 7 місяців тому

      Because it probably is China a probe droid full of rubber dog shit out of Hong kong lol

    • @zackc3368
      @zackc3368 7 місяців тому

      That's due to being held to the uk secrets act. Its deflection from giving a real answer, and from admiting he knows more

  • @CallardAndBowser
    @CallardAndBowser 7 місяців тому +3

    That's a spot of Bird Poop on the Protective Window Pane in front of the Camera Lens.

    • @raptorman48
      @raptorman48 7 місяців тому +2

      It's definitely nothing on the camera lens because of its movements it makes the camera is following it!

    • @hmq9052
      @hmq9052 7 місяців тому +3

      ​@@raptorman48Nothing ever passes in front of it. So it's clearly on the lens

    • @raptorman48
      @raptorman48 7 місяців тому +1

      @@hmq9052 The reticule is moving against it so it's not on the lens watch the thing in the camera in the center if it was on the lenes it wouldn't be moving closer and further away from it so it's time to wake up to reality the object is real but as to what it actually Is remains to be seen!

    • @hmq9052
      @hmq9052 7 місяців тому +2

      @@raptorman48 Not if the zooming was done after the recording.

    • @raptorman48
      @raptorman48 7 місяців тому

      @@hmq9052 Well even if this one is a hoax I have experienced a UFO before which was completely different and it wasn't ours from earth technology so I try to keep an open mind about it and study whatever pops up and the only thing that makes me skeptical is the fact this was declassified and released to the public and it wasn't leaked!

  • @georgeh1131
    @georgeh1131 7 місяців тому +2

    What are the camera experts saying? Now days it is very easy to add or erase something to a video or picture.

    • @mikero6225
      @mikero6225 7 місяців тому +1

      I'm also still waiting for these "journalists" to their job and bring in someone with expertise

  • @aaZhan
    @aaZhan 7 місяців тому +1

    Excellent discussion! It's great to hear all angles!

  • @ChatGPT1111
    @ChatGPT1111 7 місяців тому +3

    Occam's Razor gives one result if there are no aliens and another if there are aliens. Once you have established there are aliens, Occam's Razor says it may very well be another one.

  • @stevenduthie1848
    @stevenduthie1848 7 місяців тому +18

    To me this looks like a robot or exo suit capable of air and ground infiltration and assault.

    • @marcinhibner9507
      @marcinhibner9507 7 місяців тому +1

      That's infantry robot or exosceleton with extra equipment on attached on side. On google search looks like type of and this is abstraction distorted form on vid. Flown in and army does what it does sometimes for fun mommets or between moments of like, why not:) which makes it look like something out of this world, now. One of those moments recorded and let out. I doubt if this was secret real alien anomaly presented to them, they would give anyone a copy or let it out like for ytubeees :)

    • @visitante-pc5zc
      @visitante-pc5zc 7 місяців тому +3

      Just a balloon.
      Next

    • @zackc3368
      @zackc3368 7 місяців тому

      Then you're ignoring all the other relevant information.
      Invisible to naked eye, only visible in IR. Has no obvious exhaust, can go under water for 17 mins etc
      Also those exo suits need massive power packs which we just don't have
      Nor are current jetpacks silent

    • @zackc3368
      @zackc3368 7 місяців тому

      ​@@visitante-pc5zcif its a balloon why is it only vis in IR? If its a balloon, why is it changing within the IR scope in its heat?
      Come on Isaac, you can do this!

    • @stevenduthie1848
      @stevenduthie1848 7 місяців тому

      And you are ignoring that light bending tech is already in the public domain and also ignoring that military tech is generally many years ahead of publicaly known tech including anti-grav which has no exhaust and I'm pretty sure the ability for machines and humans in machines to go under water for 17 minutes or more has been around for a very long time and common knowledge.@@zackc3368

  • @davidhakimoglu2308
    @davidhakimoglu2308 7 місяців тому +2

    Why do people keep calling this a jellyfish? It's obviously an Imperial Probe Droid 😊

  • @buffuzo4201
    @buffuzo4201 7 місяців тому +1

    It’s a drone that fell into a swamp.

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 7 місяців тому

      Silly. It's Disney's losing the patent on Dumbo and now it's celebrating gaining its freedom by taking a mud bath.

  • @luminousminoo5316
    @luminousminoo5316 7 місяців тому +7

    It's a camo drone. 2018? Seriously!

    • @Knick3607
      @Knick3607 7 місяців тому +1

      If it was a camo drone then the military or the government would've figured that out by now.

    • @jaypee9575
      @jaypee9575 7 місяців тому

      @@Knick3607 I like how you think you know what the military has or hasn't figured out.

    • @Knick3607
      @Knick3607 7 місяців тому

      @@jaypee9575 And what do *you* think?

    • @jaypee9575
      @jaypee9575 7 місяців тому

      @@Knick3607 I'm well aware that I have no idea what the military thinks about anything, regardless of what some tabloid news site tells me.
      What do I think it is? It's an edited video made to sell a story, or for fun. Or if it is genuine, then it's one of a million obvious things. A drone, a smudge, something dangling from a helicopter, balloons.. almost anything that doesn't include aliens goblins or ghosts.
      It's an indeterminate blob on a video being packaged and bundled into a news story for the purpose of making money off of people or pushing an agenda, just like most "news".

    • @luminousminoo5316
      @luminousminoo5316 7 місяців тому

      @@Knick3607 I'm a medium. I can see better.

  • @viralsheddingzombie5324
    @viralsheddingzombie5324 7 місяців тому +3

    My theory is the "jellyfish" is a real jellyfish that learned how to fly. Maybe it invented a small jet engine.

  • @jamieking8011
    @jamieking8011 7 місяців тому +2

    That is a Floater from Fallout 76.

  • @korodski
    @korodski 7 місяців тому

    Bro this is 1000% Transformers-quality cgi😂😂

  • @simonphoenix3789
    @simonphoenix3789 7 місяців тому +5

    looks like a group of balloons maybe? I don't know, its hardly something that screams "alien spacecraft". Its unidentified and weird looking, but that's about it. Frankly anything that doesn't display some sort of incredible acceleration or speed or manages to vanish in front of the camera isn't all that interesting.

    • @angelmontano5454
      @angelmontano5454 7 місяців тому +2

      are you kidding me? groups of balloons don’t travel that fast 😂😂😂

    • @zackc3368
      @zackc3368 7 місяців тому +1

      Group of balloons are not only visible in IR

  • @WaxPaper
    @WaxPaper 7 місяців тому +5

    Oh my God, you guys can make hours of content from a minute of video. How do I get into this business?

    • @louisroth5941
      @louisroth5941 7 місяців тому +1

      I know it’s annoying

    • @BillyAu
      @BillyAu 7 місяців тому

      Start a YT channel.✌️😁👍

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 7 місяців тому

      Welcome to the 21st century.

    • @mikero6225
      @mikero6225 7 місяців тому +1

      Seriously. Jeremy is raking it in with this grift

  • @frankky9
    @frankky9 7 місяців тому

    No government on earth has something this sophisticated this is a spirit like entity

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 7 місяців тому

      Of course they have and it's called imagination. We've been using it since The Dawn Of (Wo)Man.

  • @formercustomer4061
    @formercustomer4061 7 місяців тому +1

    Also, one more observation: where it seems to be flying at a particular altitude, does that indicate seeing particular areas well, and, if so, which ones and why? Does the consistent altitude for most of the video possibly indicate limitations of the object's maneuverability? The video didn't show it entering or leaving the water, so did it fly higher or lower than its original altitude after leaving the water?

  • @Suge212
    @Suge212 7 місяців тому +4

    It's a Zerg Overlord. Seriously, do an image search.

    • @Princess-cz3hg
      @Princess-cz3hg 7 місяців тому

      It does look pretty similar! I originally thought it looked sorta like Codsworth 😂

    • @louisroth5941
      @louisroth5941 7 місяців тому

      Holy crap and those things are used for surveillance too 😂

    • @Suge212
      @Suge212 7 місяців тому

      Right? 😆@@louisroth5941

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 7 місяців тому

      That's what the kids said: "'I'm gonna make me a balloon that looks like a Zerg Overlord." and that's what he did.

    • @Suge212
      @Suge212 7 місяців тому

      These days, that's all it would take to cause a media frenzy. @@JZsBFF

  • @ansparaco
    @ansparaco 7 місяців тому +10

    Moving in a straight line at about the speed of the wind, what extraordinary mind blowing technology we're witnessing 😂

  • @vhanekyharc1475
    @vhanekyharc1475 7 місяців тому +1

    So they are telling you its either from china or non-human....And not giving an option its an american BS distraction.

  • @TFEWdirk
    @TFEWdirk 7 місяців тому +2

    Clearly it's Decepticon Shockwave. I won't be impressed until we see Megatron...

  • @AlleyCatG3K
    @AlleyCatG3K 7 місяців тому +3

    This falls into Timothy's work about Peru's "Aliens". It's people using advanced technology.

    • @chaosdweller
      @chaosdweller 7 місяців тому

      What's up with all the cats on YT here lately haha.

  • @atdi72
    @atdi72 7 місяців тому +8

    Drone with a light fabric costume draped over it. 😂

    • @CoryJamezztastic
      @CoryJamezztastic 7 місяців тому

      Lmao and how is the drone flying? You see any propellers? Or wait l, why was it reported silent? Oh why is its thermal temperature changing hot to cold to hot, none of these things you can answer? Lmao if not fuck off haha

  • @mantovannni
    @mantovannni 7 місяців тому +1

    There is no such thing as an UFO expert. We just do not (at the civilian level and at military level) know enough for there to be an expert.

  • @davidedmistone8260
    @davidedmistone8260 7 місяців тому +2

    Are we sure it’s not an XJ9-CS14, commonly known as a Viper probe droid?

  • @RASAllusion
    @RASAllusion 7 місяців тому +3

    It i time to tell the truth.
    Especially if the truth is that we know this IS happening but we don't know what it is.
    Be HONEST about that and then lets work together to figure it out.

  • @eddeeshaw543
    @eddeeshaw543 7 місяців тому +3

    kind of flies like a drone

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 7 місяців тому

      It also hovers/drifts like a balloon

  • @TenFalconsMusic
    @TenFalconsMusic 7 місяців тому +2

    There's an identical floating robot in the video game 'Escape from Butcher Bay.'

  • @canufi6my
    @canufi6my 7 місяців тому +1

    It's a base recon drone doing it's thing with bug splatter on the exterior glass. Same thing as a dashcam.

    • @stewpot6998
      @stewpot6998 7 місяців тому

      Nope. That's been debunked. The object has parts and rotates.

    • @canufi6my
      @canufi6my 7 місяців тому

      No it doesn't, the splatter is on the lense protector and the camera is rotated by the operator. Some Recon Camera Gimbals have a rotatable lense protector, like on a NASCAR onboard camera, to rotate dirt and debris out of the camera's view. Look up how a Recon camera works and the mystery will be solved.@@stewpot6998

  • @slothpajamas
    @slothpajamas 7 місяців тому +12

    It’s literally bird crap on the lens are yall serious

    • @13orrax
      @13orrax 7 місяців тому +5

      yes because bird crap moves around on the lens and is in focus

    • @luminousminoo5316
      @luminousminoo5316 7 місяців тому

      😂😂😂

    • @floridajames04
      @floridajames04 7 місяців тому +2

      Yeah because the Marine who came forward and confirmed this sighting in person last night saw bird poop floating!?!? 😂😂

    • @Knick3607
      @Knick3607 7 місяців тому +2

      That was deconfirmed.

    • @4faxache935
      @4faxache935 7 місяців тому +2

      Or a helicopter out of shot with a cargo net hanging down.
      It certainly isn't an alien/UAP 🤣🤣🤣

  • @desertweasel6965
    @desertweasel6965 7 місяців тому +3

    "Oh DARF!! Im soooo stumped, I can't fathom an actual smudge or plastic bag. No,no,no this, THIS IS A FLYING FUCKING JELLYFISH".

    • @raptorman48
      @raptorman48 7 місяців тому

      Well it's obviously not a smudge or a plastic bag and if you had any observation skills you would know this instead of making such a stupid comment!

  • @KTHKUHNKK
    @KTHKUHNKK 7 місяців тому

    AND SUCH A CLEAR IMAGE, MUST BE A TOP NOTCH CAMERA

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 7 місяців тому

      And still not conclusive.

  • @johnbravo7542
    @johnbravo7542 7 місяців тому +1

    In Australia we only have flying kangaroos

  • @AnticAgnostic
    @AnticAgnostic 7 місяців тому +3

    It's literally a man in a standing position with some sort of large jet pack behind him. You can clearly see the man's outline in front of the jet pack at 2:35 - 2:36. The military is probably testing some sort of stealth capability with the jet pack.

    • @stewstube70
      @stewstube70 7 місяців тому

      No thermal signature from the jet buddy.

  • @aaronscottmatthews7883
    @aaronscottmatthews7883 7 місяців тому +5

    the Jellyfish looks like one of those metal orbs had a malfunction as it was traveling between dimensions lol
    Seriously, it looks like a blob of molten rock was thrown in a pool - perhaps this was the result of this craft being formed in a body of water. BTW There have been many reports of these objects dripping molten metal.

  • @knottyinks1
    @knottyinks1 7 місяців тому +1

    Modern hologram technology make a great deterrent / confusing image for enemy but they can only currently travel alongside a vehicle/ aircraft so they only project parallel images with no perspective ie getting bigger smaller

  • @richardwarner3705
    @richardwarner3705 7 місяців тому +2

    China wouldn't have such tech unless they still it from us. So, it's not from China. And, Russia?😆😂🤣

  • @mcnowski
    @mcnowski 7 місяців тому +4

    Bird poo on the lens 100%

    • @JamesWatheist
      @JamesWatheist 7 місяців тому

      It moves on the lense in relation to the foxes focal point. Something on the lense would remain stationary relation to the fixed point.

    • @mcnowski
      @mcnowski 7 місяців тому

      Its zooming in and out@@JamesWatheist

    • @JamesWatheist
      @JamesWatheist 7 місяців тому

      @mcnowski If it's on the lense itself it should be in a fixed position related to the focal point. I'm not a photograph expert the ones who have opined so far seem to be saying it's not a smudge on the lens.
      We haven't seen the full video, but the claim is that it leaves the field of view, enters a body of water, remains submerged for over 15 minutes and shoots up at incredible speed, if that's true and we see that it would seem pretty definitive that this is real.

    • @mcnowski
      @mcnowski 7 місяців тому

      That footage of it going into the ocean will never surface because it never happened. The so called "tentacles" are the bird poo running down the lens. This is just cheap media hype to generate views and ad revenue. @@JamesWatheist

    • @theotheleo6830
      @theotheleo6830 7 місяців тому

      @@mcnowski The marine who saw the video said it became smaller as it moved into the distance, so that proves it wasn't a stain.

  • @KangofNomadicTravels
    @KangofNomadicTravels 7 місяців тому +6

    It's a drone jellyfish. I saw them at the drone test conference. There cool a little weird. Nothing to call the local news over. Probably tell the FAA about it. Cheers 🥂🥃😎 Happy MS NEW YEARS!!!!

    • @zackc3368
      @zackc3368 7 місяців тому

      Drones that are invisible to the naked eye 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
      Drones only visible in IR 😂😂😂😂😂😂
      Drones that can fly, go into water for 17 minutes under then come back out and fly off 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @GladBeastBoy
    @GladBeastBoy 7 місяців тому +1

    expert on ufos just sounds funny

    • @jaypee9575
      @jaypee9575 7 місяців тому

      Like being an expert on unicorns.

  • @Eatadikcommiepig
    @Eatadikcommiepig 7 місяців тому

    Media will do anything to keep our mind off of a certain list of people that went to a certain island

  • @TenthCrane2788
    @TenthCrane2788 7 місяців тому +3

    This was recorded in 2018. Have there been anymore sighting? If no...then it wasn't alien.

    • @jamesgilstrap8907
      @jamesgilstrap8907 7 місяців тому +5

      I don't think I understand what you are saying. How does not seeing it not make it alien?

    • @DTSkywatch24
      @DTSkywatch24 7 місяців тому +2

      Who said alien

    • @TenthCrane2788
      @TenthCrane2788 7 місяців тому

      @@jamesgilstrap8907
      I don't understand the sentence.
      "How does not seeing it not make it alien?"

    • @TenthCrane2788
      @TenthCrane2788 7 місяців тому

      @@DTSkywatch24
      It's either alien or not alien. It's more interesting for some to think it's alien instead of a garbage bag being blown in the wind.

    • @Tom6567my
      @Tom6567my 7 місяців тому +2

      That makes no sense

  • @bigphinis675
    @bigphinis675 7 місяців тому +4

    Fake

  • @Smudgedoodle1978
    @Smudgedoodle1978 7 місяців тому

    Well, their shield generator is f@cked!!……..look out for AT-AT’s!! lol 😂😂

  • @truthisoutthere6721
    @truthisoutthere6721 7 місяців тому +1

    Some kids made a balloon.

  • @melxb
    @melxb 7 місяців тому +1

    looks like bird poop on camera lens lol

  • @Mr.Dingbat
    @Mr.Dingbat 7 місяців тому +1

    It's 2024! and this is the best video quality they can provide.

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 7 місяців тому

      Some things have changed since the Loch Ness Monster Snapshot... and somethings haven't. Must be a conspiracy to blurr all. Must be the Poorly Illuminati or The Out Of Focus Templar Knights.

  • @chadspencer7595
    @chadspencer7595 7 місяців тому +1

    Anybody consider that it's hanging from a wire (via drone above)? If it's a foil balloon of some type, it would change temperature with the surroundings pretty quickly. Plus, this explains how it might come in-and-out of the water. Just saying...

  • @grayj7441
    @grayj7441 7 місяців тому

    The only question is who crashed a million dollar drone through a tree?