КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @Seeker
    @Seeker 5 років тому +210

    Whadya say, Seekers, would you move to an experimental city in the ocean?

    • @RaphaelYarish
      @RaphaelYarish 5 років тому +11

      Probably not, lot's of problems with this idea

    • @TheGuruNetOn
      @TheGuruNetOn 5 років тому +7

      A lake resort sounds good to start with.

    • @svguenevere
      @svguenevere 5 років тому +5

      Would I? In a HOT SECOND!
      Count me in!!! Lived on our sailboat for years and LOVE it. We were very self sufficient with our solar power & RO for fresh water. WHAT IS TAKING SO LONG??? Saw this or very similar ideas long ago.

    • @pahvalrehljkov
      @pahvalrehljkov 5 років тому +5

      for an experiment, i could pack in 5 minutes... to move in, i would need to see it in action, and prob also have money for it (lottery or blind experiment :D )... this is big and expensive project, i dont think this dandy wandy *group or whatever sorted all of the engineering problems it holds, also this reminds me of venus project too much... we arent aware as an society still to achieve this without private ownership and problem of huge profit which it pursues...

    • @filip3148
      @filip3148 5 років тому +2

      The Dictator approve, floaty Whaidya isa very nice.

  • @P0werJack
    @P0werJack 5 років тому +1142

    Us: How close are we?
    Them: Close.
    Us: OK but how close are we?
    Them: Closer than you might think.
    Us: ................

    • @Menaceblue3
      @Menaceblue3 5 років тому +23

      The goal post is continuously changing

    • @trivkypeak-eye3557
      @trivkypeak-eye3557 5 років тому +8

      With most of the ocean unexplored, I bet 'murica would be having fun scooping up oil spills
      (An eco-friendly america,who thought)

    • @marshall4719
      @marshall4719 5 років тому +17

      Basically its never going to happen people rather move inland to avoid raising sea levels than actually live on the water, they'd have a better chance pitching the idea of self sustaining underground neighborhoods to avoid nuclear fallout.

    • @BigFoe
      @BigFoe 5 років тому +9

      They always name their videos like this. Just to get more views.

    • @P0werJack
      @P0werJack 5 років тому +5

      @The Urban Bourbon Bloke yeah but before that they were saying that it was close and closer and etc.
      And I don't know about you but 20 years is not really around the corner for me.

  • @dominicjose3660
    @dominicjose3660 5 років тому +468

    0:04 'Do you ever get an urge to just build a new world?'
    Yes, that's why people play minecraft.

    • @xhivo97
      @xhivo97 5 років тому +6

      I feel like she knew what she said

    • @dominicjose3660
      @dominicjose3660 5 років тому +5

      @@xhivo97 yea...I know...I was bored...I'll leave now.😔

    • @bethymears2648
      @bethymears2648 4 роки тому +1

      Why not build high rises under ground.

    • @finnoconnor6200
      @finnoconnor6200 3 роки тому +1

      best thing ive herd all day no joke

  • @bri1085
    @bri1085 5 років тому +213

    Dolphins would've built Atlantis if they had thumbs

    • @afifassihab7953
      @afifassihab7953 5 років тому +2

      hahaha. :)

    • @samuelnakai1804
      @samuelnakai1804 5 років тому +9

      They also would be jerking off with fish.
      Moreso often than they already do.

    • @MichaelSHartman
      @MichaelSHartman 5 років тому +5

      Second only to humans brain to body ratio with an estimated IQ around 50-70, your jest may have some truth to it. Behaviors include juveniles passing a puffer fish around getting a narcotic high. I am not joking.

    • @ianhubbard641
      @ianhubbard641 4 роки тому

      What dolphins are the Atlantians 👀👀👀

    • @musicbox8351
      @musicbox8351 4 роки тому +1

      Dolphins were devolved by ancient Sumerians

  • @samueldormervil
    @samueldormervil 5 років тому +280

    Hurricane: looks good, mind if I stop by?

    • @chadleach6009
      @chadleach6009 5 років тому +12

      Thats where the submersible design shines. Like trying to blow over a hole in the ground.

    • @STUMP_
      @STUMP_ 5 років тому +22

      @@chadleach6009 Tell that to the oil rigs in the Golf of Mexico 🤣 I guess you never lived in a hurricane prone area? Actually just look at the picture of Hurricane Katrina when it was a cat. 3. That shit rip up an Oil Rig and had thrown it into the middle of Louisiana.

    • @crackedemerald4930
      @crackedemerald4930 5 років тому +3

      Thank goodness they are only common on the gulf of mexico

    • @STUMP_
      @STUMP_ 5 років тому +2

      @@crackedemerald4930 And most of the East Coast.

    • @chadleach6009
      @chadleach6009 5 років тому +6

      @@STUMP_ Lol do you know what an oil rig is? It's a big metal kite. think before you speak next time to avoid making yourself look silly.

  • @clinged2711
    @clinged2711 5 років тому +324

    30 years later still a concept.

    • @Vipppala
      @Vipppala 5 років тому +36

      ofcourse its still a concept, no one is gonna just randomly fund something like this xD

    • @JoaoGomes-dr5yo
      @JoaoGomes-dr5yo 5 років тому +3

      maybe when we don't have more space they think better on this, nobody wants spend money in a new thing like that, maybe they need more investidors.

    • @gaurtaukwhiteangel5779
      @gaurtaukwhiteangel5779 5 років тому +9

      it is passed concept, Saudi Arabia, an or Dubai, these place are building out into the oceans around them

    • @nmc400
      @nmc400 5 років тому +8

      @@gaurtaukwhiteangel5779 well thats because theyre filthy stinkin rich. They built their own island. Dubai is already a huge hot sppt for rich people to vacation. Wont surprise me if they do underwater hotels or housing thatll bring in even more tourists l.

    • @d3r4g45
      @d3r4g45 5 років тому

      For a reason

  • @cjprowe5
    @cjprowe5 5 років тому +154

    I wish we would've seen more of the logistical things for the city

    • @user-jg3pl2gg1n
      @user-jg3pl2gg1n 5 років тому +3

      Go and do it

    • @CaedenV
      @CaedenV 5 років тому +2

      lol, they would like to too

    • @IndraSunrise
      @IndraSunrise 5 років тому +2

      They literally talk about how these wouldn't be out in the open ocean.

  • @canyuewang7096
    @canyuewang7096 5 років тому +191

    humans: we are gonna build floating cities
    Earth: I dont think so

    • @re2pecthebest130
      @re2pecthebest130 3 роки тому

      @broman you couldn't have sayed better

    • @faheezsyed
      @faheezsyed 2 роки тому

      @@re2pecthebest130 are from indonasia or india or pakistan

  • @AdamPitas
    @AdamPitas 5 років тому +132

    It's gonna have to stay coastal. Rogue waves are no joke out in the ocean.

    • @oshotz
      @oshotz 5 років тому +7

      Next video: _How close are we to blowing up the moon?_

    • @runningwild9386
      @runningwild9386 5 років тому +10

      @@oshotz Its already blown up. What you see today in the sky is a hologram.

    • @danielrodrigues4903
      @danielrodrigues4903 4 роки тому +1

      @@runningwild9386 That is some Gurren Lagann shit

    • @victorrosales35
      @victorrosales35 4 роки тому +2

      @@runningwild9386 ok BOOMER

  • @AngelLestat2
    @AngelLestat2 5 років тому +130

    is a shame that they did not speak much about the design and materials.
    All the other things they talk about were obvious and not even needed.

    • @metalcake2288
      @metalcake2288 5 років тому +19

      Common problem with seeker videos. Mostly sensationalist thumbnails with basic information

    • @wincification
      @wincification 5 років тому +5

      @@metalcake2288 It's ment to be merely an introduction video. You can't talk about many details in under 10 minutes long video. Feel free to use links in the description and Google the other things you want to know...

    • @metalcake2288
      @metalcake2288 5 років тому +3

      @@wincification check out coldfusion's videos. Highly informative and typically between 8 and 18 minutes long.

    • @marin7615
      @marin7615 4 роки тому +1

      @AngelLestat2 ..these are architects. Construction artists, dreamers, spatial problem solvers. With all the respect they don't and should not know anything about design and materials. That's not their job, otherwise you would call them engineers.

  • @duchi882
    @duchi882 5 років тому +354

    *"How Close Are We to Living in the Ocean?"*
    *Spongebob:* Bold of you to assume we haven't already

  • @zonaryorange8734
    @zonaryorange8734 5 років тому +101

    1:35
    *Talks about sea level rise*
    *Shows Chicago underwater even though the city is elevated in central North America*

    • @periculum69
      @periculum69 5 років тому +6

      Isn't Chicago the city they had to literally raise up in the 1850's due to it being below the water level of Lake Michigan? How high did they lift it with those jacks? I can't imagine that it's that high now, so it could very well have flooding issues with rising water levels.

    • @BenTajer89
      @BenTajer89 5 років тому +1

      @@periculum69 the point is that Lake Michigan's water level is completely unaffected by sea level rise. If anything, it could fall with global warming as the region is supposed to get drier.

    • @zonaryorange8734
      @zonaryorange8734 5 років тому +2

      Zuberi Chicago where it lies is nearly 600ft above sea level. Imagine it as that The Great Lakes were once at sea level thousands or maybe even millions of years ago, but then the entire continent of North America slowly started rising up in many places, so then the lakes and the water on them rose up with the continent. That’s how they are where they are today and completely unaffected by the oceans rising. Just look at a map dude

    • @allensturdivant3044
      @allensturdivant3044 3 роки тому

      That part of Central North America is low enough to be affected by the worst of sea level rise. It's not distance from the ocean, it's elevation.

  • @BarelyNoticeable
    @BarelyNoticeable 5 років тому +46

    Space people: so we’ve already gotten a solid invention for housing on Mars, and we’ve been having so much progress in these past few years!
    Ocean people: so we’ve already concepted ideas of sea islands and now further research is being done to soon live on the ocean!
    People people: okay wait so are we trying to solve global warming? Wh-
    _People_ *people* people: shh...

    • @carlosjohnson1434
      @carlosjohnson1434 5 років тому +2

      😂😂

    • @stealthboy5767
      @stealthboy5767 4 роки тому

      I am ocean people
      And I wanna kms

    • @nathan3721
      @nathan3721 3 роки тому +2

      The ocean is more important than Mars at the moment. The moon is too. Two priorities for colonization: ocean, moon.

    • @jonnaking3054
      @jonnaking3054 2 роки тому

      @@nathan3721 Agree! most ppl seem to be in favor of colonizing the ocean, so I say the ocean it should be then! I mean we practically know more about Mars than we do over 50% of our own planet!

  • @chaos8824
    @chaos8824 5 років тому +64

    everyone gucci until the sea make you do a 180

    • @007lutherking
      @007lutherking 5 років тому +5

      Sea storms lol curious how they'd tackle those.

  • @laurentmartin2385
    @laurentmartin2385 5 років тому +56

    How close is the bourgeoisie to living in the ocean ? *

    • @bri1085
      @bri1085 5 років тому +16

      Better question would be, how close are we to bringing out the guillotines

    • @gaybroshevik4180
      @gaybroshevik4180 5 років тому +2

      ♥️♥️♥️

  • @vortex05
    @vortex05 5 років тому +41

    Some similarities to the design of the Atlantis City Ship (Stargate Atlantis)

  • @makhanlalkar3111
    @makhanlalkar3111 5 років тому +54

    This is why I want to do ENGINEERING!!

    • @pjanoo6973
      @pjanoo6973 5 років тому +1

      @Nancy Jo Google is your friend

    • @Dylan-hh7vo
      @Dylan-hh7vo 5 років тому +4

      I'm an engineer and its the best decision I've ever made - it's worth the tough schooling

    • @fkncompton7124
      @fkncompton7124 5 років тому +1

      @@Dylan-hh7vo nice. What type of engineer?

    • @Dylan-hh7vo
      @Dylan-hh7vo 5 років тому +3

      @@fkncompton7124 Environmental engineering - I do a mix of microbial, chemical engineering and renewable energy work.

    • @marin7615
      @marin7615 4 роки тому +2

      Advice from an engineer: engineers working on the design of these kind of things are definitevely below 0,05%.
      Before you decide to begin university try to understand what the most common engineers out there are working on or you might end up badly disappointed.

  • @dbsirius
    @dbsirius 5 років тому +23

    When the sea levels rise, we'll all be living in the ocean.

    • @bri1085
      @bri1085 5 років тому

      As per Ben Shapiro

    • @777Ryank
      @777Ryank 5 років тому

      According to bs evolution we'll eventually grow gills so there will be no problem with that!! Let's go!!

  • @ecognitio9605
    @ecognitio9605 5 років тому +141

    The title should be " How close are we to living on top of the Ocean?"
    Also this whole video smells like a weird advert for "Oceanics"....

    • @visbytheproducer
      @visbytheproducer 5 років тому +3

      Living in the ocean is correct, do you say "I live on the US" or "in the US"

    • @joshnic6639
      @joshnic6639 5 років тому +2

      Visby That’s not the same difference because the US. Isn’t water.

    • @operatorjewski9450
      @operatorjewski9450 5 років тому +1

      @@visbytheproducer he said "on top"

    • @visbytheproducer
      @visbytheproducer 5 років тому

      @@operatorjewski9450 oops I missed a single word how dare I

    • @operatorjewski9450
      @operatorjewski9450 5 років тому +5

      @@visbytheproducer yes, how dare you

  • @romakolvakh6813
    @romakolvakh6813 5 років тому +26

    you've avoided the stormy weather subject, how those kind of villages will survive after smth like Katrina Hurricane ?

    • @ToxicFaithPHD
      @ToxicFaithPHD 5 років тому

      The same way villages on land survie. Which is to say they don't survive. Short of knocking the storm off course by cloud seeding there isn't anything that can be done.

    • @St.CrimsonTweets
      @St.CrimsonTweets 5 років тому +6

      they will row the city away like a viking ship

    • @Sadboy80629
      @Sadboy80629 3 роки тому

      it sings under water and seals off all entrances after it detects big windy circle within 3 miles. it will effectively drown anyone outside but save thousands if the big windy thing actually hits it and doesn't turn

  • @xxxSauSjexxx
    @xxxSauSjexxx 5 років тому +9

    I do believe that we are closer than we think because in Rotterdam in the Netherlands there is a floating farm with cows.

  • @jamesletford4266
    @jamesletford4266 5 років тому +14

    Surely the obvious choice of power production for a floating city would be converting kinetic energy from the waves into electricity

    • @pedrolmlkzk
      @pedrolmlkzk 5 років тому +1

      Cities Skilines?

    • @Sadboy80629
      @Sadboy80629 3 роки тому

      @@pedrolmlkzk thank you for renting us this land

    • @wackonaut
      @wackonaut 3 роки тому +1

      Whats up with #WaterWorks? Showering with bottled water is getting kind of expensive.

  • @ReclusiveEagle
    @ReclusiveEagle 5 років тому +13

    "We just need a partnership with a city to build the infrastructure for a 1st prototype it's that simple"
    Let me introduce you to Bureaucracy .....
    *10 Years later* ..... "We finally have the paperwork needed for the zone"
    *5 years later* .... "We finally have the construction company on board" ....
    *3 Years later, Massive protests on its viability and impact*

    • @Dell-ol6hb
      @Dell-ol6hb 5 років тому

      Reclusive Eagle pretty much lol

    • @DoctorlyRob
      @DoctorlyRob 5 років тому

      Yea this is exactly what I was saying when I heard them say that... "We are closer than you think!" bro you haven't even started to get close yet!

    • @Sadboy80629
      @Sadboy80629 3 роки тому

      makes sense. if they build it right away it would be like accepting a scam email from a Nigerian seller to send money. usually scams can be seen through by 10 years

  • @xavierperez5593
    @xavierperez5593 5 років тому +9

    "What happend to your house mate?"
    "Sank...."

  • @SusiBiker
    @SusiBiker 5 років тому +24

    ...and then there was this storm...

    • @tweedits4658
      @tweedits4658 3 роки тому +2

      All your gonna see is a bunch of giant vegan rafts flying through the air Lmao

    • @jayson546
      @jayson546 3 роки тому

      😂😂😂 yup that’s exactly when I stopped listening.

    • @Dark_Force_Of_Wishes
      @Dark_Force_Of_Wishes 3 роки тому +1

      And Then We Sank The City.

  • @arsh132
    @arsh132 5 років тому +63

    I can already picture all the vegans packing their bags(and swimsuits)

    • @luism5514
      @luism5514 5 років тому +18

      Man a vegan ocean city? Yeah good luck, some people take good ideas way too far, I bet these are the same kinds of people that created religion out of simple moral codes and stories. Why not eat fish on top of the plant based diet since you are an OCEAN CITY.

    • @St.CrimsonTweets
      @St.CrimsonTweets 5 років тому +13

      Vegan until they smell that first Salmon getting grilled just right... on the beach that's like 50 yards away.

    • @ScottyDexter
      @ScottyDexter 4 роки тому +2

      Here it is! I was looking for this comment! lol

    • @Ceeckoful
      @Ceeckoful 4 роки тому +3

      @@St.CrimsonTweets I literally live with meat eaters and don't ever want to eat dead grilled corpses.

    • @St.CrimsonTweets
      @St.CrimsonTweets 4 роки тому +1

      @@Ceeckoful you'll also never live in these ocean cities so I wasn't calling you out was i?

  • @MagneticPortal1
    @MagneticPortal1 5 років тому +7

    Just as now a world without cellphones is hard to imagine, some day a world without floating cities will be unimaginable for some.

    • @feynstein1004
      @feynstein1004 5 років тому

      That's an interesting thought. Technology is just so awesome 🙂

    • @feynstein1004
      @feynstein1004 5 років тому

      @Neil Underwood Hmm this got real weird real quick. But I hope things get better for you.

  • @floatingtigerscarriff6664
    @floatingtigerscarriff6664 5 років тому +15

    Well yeah if its resistant to any floods,tsunami and earthquake is it resistant to kaiju attacks?

  • @anonymousbacon3233
    @anonymousbacon3233 5 років тому +28

    I hope so. I could live in an aquarium and there’d be no security guard to tell me to get out of the squid tank.

    • @gj9157
      @gj9157 5 років тому

      Hentai?

  • @lexxstargazer6011
    @lexxstargazer6011 5 років тому +22

    I get it now! All of the plastic in the ocean was thrown there to make it look like home, how convenient!

    • @hariangr
      @hariangr 5 років тому +2

      well, I guess I should throw trash in the ocean from now

  • @MrDollaBillman
    @MrDollaBillman 5 років тому +31

    Have fun with your vegetables, I'll be fishing/shrimping. 😁

    • @joe4324
      @joe4324 5 років тому +5

      if you have 6,000 people floating mostly stationary you would decimate the ocean life for miles in all directions with even a small percentage of fish added to the diet. The whole point of this is to live lightly ontop of that ecosystem and if anyone make it healthier.

    • @Skittenmeow
      @Skittenmeow 5 років тому +4

      Seaweed is delicious!

    • @oPHILOSORAPTORo
      @oPHILOSORAPTORo 5 років тому +4

      @@joe4324 Fish farms are a thing. She even said "aquaponics". That's hydroponic farming, combined with fish farms to reduce the required resources. Extremely efficient.

    • @brandonvessell4659
      @brandonvessell4659 4 роки тому +1

      You could still eat fish on a floating city

  • @DraconaiMac
    @DraconaiMac 5 років тому +7

    This city would never survive a significant oceanic event. It's beautiful but, if we want it to survive, it has to be beneath the waves.

    • @CaedenV
      @CaedenV 5 років тому +1

      Yep, anything left outside will be lost. Unless it is under the water, or covered in a glass dome, dont expect it to last long. The salt intrusion from the air alone will cause endless headaches for growing food without a bubble.

  • @jbrassard100
    @jbrassard100 5 років тому +8

    Shout out to the Seasteading Institute and plans to make stateless cities.

  • @khodahh
    @khodahh 5 років тому +6

    Architects : We gonna build humble hexagonal platforms in order to recreate a sense of simple neighbourhood life [...] New urbanism [...] we are so innovative and everything [...] no meat [...] compost and sense of ownership...
    Weather : hold my clouds!

  • @ExPhantomHD
    @ExPhantomHD 5 років тому +11

    "Were quickly running out of frontiers" um, no

  • @kuryamtl
    @kuryamtl 5 років тому +1

    I was (am) a fan of Seaquest, and remember wanting the future to be like that, where we would live even under the ocean. Maybe one day.

  • @kurtlindner
    @kurtlindner 5 років тому +4

    1:30 No, it is the anarchist Utopia you originally mentioned.
    The planting situation in those artist rendering is a joke, to have that many fresh water needing plants, the entire thing would have to be a desalination platform.

    • @pedrolmlkzk
      @pedrolmlkzk 5 років тому

      or they could be very good at water recicling

    • @kurtlindner
      @kurtlindner 5 років тому +1

      @@pedrolmlkzk I say often that I like being wrong, and would love to be here. The first thing I thought of is how I would _make_ it work, aeroponics being obvious for it's efficiency overall, but I don't see full garden lined walkways or towering trees being a normal thing in this environment.

  • @deluxeassortment
    @deluxeassortment 5 років тому +8

    I'll just move inland, thank you

  • @zakiducky
    @zakiducky 5 років тому +1

    1:04 Not decades, but centuries and arguably even millennia. Much of the older core of Boston actually sits on what used to be open water, as one example. This land reclamation has happened since at least the 1600s, iirc. (It most definitely happened during the 1700s, but I no longer remember the start date off the top of my head, hence why I’m unsure if the 1600s are also included in that figure.) And the Romans expanded Rome by draining the swamps and wetlands beneath the seven hills, building palaces, homes and even part of the Coliseum on what used to be water and/or swampy soil. Never mind that some of their harbor structures are built of concrete that has weather millennia of erosion by the tides- a feat that would be impressive for even modern concrete. To say cities have only been expanding into water for a few decades at this part of the video implies it’s a recent development, when we’ve had and used the technology to reclaim land for millennia. _Floating_ cities, on the other hand are a much more recent possibility. Although, there’s again room for debate when you examine some past civilizations’ technological feats. (Looking at you Tenochititlan and Zheng He.)

  • @Rin-qj7zt
    @Rin-qj7zt 5 років тому +11

    and then a hurricane comes along and destroys the entire city lol.
    tho i'm sure they already thought of such an obvious problem.

    • @estudiordl
      @estudiordl 5 років тому +1

      Do they? Srry, just came from a Fukushima video. I would thought THEY thought about that little issue...

  • @hpensive
    @hpensive 5 років тому +8

    I wonder if Oceanics worked with Jacque Fresco?

  • @zellfrainbow
    @zellfrainbow 5 років тому +4

    and then the shark solo sub would be the go to vehicle :P
    Love it!

  • @FosterBaba
    @FosterBaba 5 років тому +1

    Environmental focus. Very good. Immediate issue I noticed that wasnt addressed (almost). The cities blocking the ocean from the sky. While encouraging coral, letting in sunlight, and being green on the city is good, my first concerns was CO2 levels. While the sunlight will help existing underwater plants, the sheer surface areas of these cities will block any Oxygen from coming in from the atmosphere. Maybe have algae farms connected to the ocean to promote oxygen and have a food source that can be used for the general population or to bait fish as needed

  • @tomstein7131
    @tomstein7131 5 років тому +2

    I’m designing a floating city for a geography project. Here’s the idea for my notes so far. If anyone wants to give me any ideas or help it’d be appreciated. Also I realise natural disasters like tsunamis would be something that a floating city couldn’t really be protected against, so I’ve come to the conclusion that I’ll just have to build it somewhere that is is sheltered and can’t have tsunamis or tropical storms and where there is never any earth quakes.
    Geography Project: Design a City
    I’m going to build it floating on the ocean by the coast. I’ll need to go and watch that seeker video again. There’ll be a hyperloop system that is constructed under the sea bed. This will be built by accessing the undersea area via the land. People in the city will be able to access the hyperloop system by going to mini entrances on the outside (like in New York) as well as a few central stations similar to main train stations. You will go down through the water in water tight lifts inside pressurised tubes that’ll be lowered into pre-fitted holes on the sea bed. Travelling to the city from the land will also be done through a hyperloop that links the two. Basic Needs(water, food, energy): Water is an easy one; the city is built on the ocean so water will just be extracted and filtered so humans can use it. The stuff filtered from it will either be used for other things or just dropped back into the water. Food is more complicated. This is supposed to be sustainable and carbon neutral, so we can’t really be farming with cows, pigs, chicken and such. We can grow plants though, something that doesn’t have to take up too much lateral space. I’ll have to go back and look in my book at the ways of growing plants inside but I think it’ll just need some UV lights, warm temperatures
    And mist with all the nutrients the plants need to grow (water, nitrogen, carbon). The carbon is a good one. I’ll have to have a look on the internet at this but I think you could get a system that will extract CO2 from the atmosphere or maybe there’s even carbon in sea water from pollution. Energy shouldn’t be too hard. Seen as there really be much need for roads due to the hyperloop, we can ascribe more space for solar panels. All the roofs will be solar panelled and there’ll be huge battery stations on the sea bed I think. Also hydro powered energy seems like an opportunity that would be stupid to ignore given the environment. There’ll be that, and if those aren’t enough I’ll just put wind farms in at a little bit of a distance from the main part of the city to avoid disruption.

  • @HardDrumStep
    @HardDrumStep 5 років тому +209

    I can't wait to sleep next to my garbage I threw in the bin 2 weeks ago.

    • @mhead81
      @mhead81 5 років тому +3

      trash U throw in ocean eat turtles dolphins and rest rare animals

    • @ivonunes3937
      @ivonunes3937 5 років тому +7

      Barskor1 not always

    • @andriasoriano2774
      @andriasoriano2774 5 років тому +8

      Trueskeptic your so wrong

    • @Dell-ol6hb
      @Dell-ol6hb 5 років тому +7

      Trueskeptic that is very wrong dude

    • @stephencothran3702
      @stephencothran3702 5 років тому +3

      @@gj9157 great pacific patch

  • @Ranger_Cod
    @Ranger_Cod 5 років тому +8

    Why is Chicago shown flooded its by a Lake not a Ocean?
    A Lake
    1:36

  • @zedrameses1564
    @zedrameses1564 5 років тому +2

    Architects love to draw. This aquatic city is just that - drawings. Have they ever considered rogue waves? I think it's safer to build the habitat underwater.

  • @woltews
    @woltews 5 років тому

    larger waist water treatments use less energy then smaller ones , this means that you want to collect waist water from a lot of users which means you have to connect them with pipes that can move the waist water but pipes that bend tend to not last well in the places they bend and leak which if you are in the water means it would leak into the water you are living on , and if you want lots of small water treatment facilities then your energy usage is exponentially higher and that energy CAN NEVER BE UNINTERRUPTIBLE like what you get from solar or wind or wave

  • @vinothshepard7451
    @vinothshepard7451 5 років тому +10

    What about tornados and hurricanes?

  • @EctoMorpheus
    @EctoMorpheus 5 років тому +3

    That's cute, but the Seasteading Institute has been on this for years.
    Still, since none of these projects has led to an actual village/city yet, the more of these projects the better!

  • @ratillaarl1123
    @ratillaarl1123 5 років тому +13

    Hell nah I ain't living on an island where I only ieat veges..

    • @bri1085
      @bri1085 5 років тому

      You could eat nuts too

  • @A13U53D
    @A13U53D 5 років тому +10

    Sea birds and fish would be all the "meat" I'd need to go with the fruit and vegies, so it's fine with me. XD

  • @johnvillan9794
    @johnvillan9794 5 років тому +7

    I think that one ladies mic muffled what she was saying lolol

  • @CuckaOccurs
    @CuckaOccurs 5 років тому +6

    I'm glad they touched on the fact that the oceans are coming to us as opposed to the other way around.

  • @loutoronto1699
    @loutoronto1699 5 років тому

    The best way is to construct a tubular anchor that goes up and down mechanically or some time of buoy inside a tubular anchor so it would stabilize the movement of the floating city. When the tide goes up, the city goes up as well or vice versa. Instead of worrying about different types of movements in the sea.

  • @code4chaosmobile
    @code4chaosmobile 5 років тому

    I really enjoyed this video and request more. Keep them coming I'll watch every one

  • @user-hh2is9kg9j
    @user-hh2is9kg9j 5 років тому +3

    watching this from an Oil rig in the middle of the ocean.

  • @courtneyj9564
    @courtneyj9564 5 років тому +5

    Beautiful but this looks like a 2220 kinda thing. I would be long dead by the completion of this project

    • @jakesutton8077
      @jakesutton8077 5 років тому +1

      Yeah, but that's the same mindset all these old people running the world into the ground have.

    • @courtneyj9564
      @courtneyj9564 5 років тому +1

      @@jakesutton8077 true

  • @tonitouchberry894
    @tonitouchberry894 5 років тому

    The platform arrangements look just lovely, BUT, have you ever looked at how treacherous ocean waves are during a storm! Have you watched huge ships trying to survive them! There would have to be some sort of --- gyroscopic leveling system, but even so it might be better to have the capacity to submerge during rough seas?!? I'm a 74 year old woman. Scared shitless of sharks, but totally facinated by this huge water surface of ours! I want to live in your city on the sea! Maybe my next life!!😁👍

  • @marin7615
    @marin7615 4 роки тому +1

    We all know where this is going: the richest people will be able to live in a safe and ecological place leaving phisically behind all the problems of the earth (lack of energy, water, food etc).
    Good work! I love these genius architects, mostly unable to solve even the minor and most common city problems, they just want a blank page to start dreaming.
    Rest in peace Le Corbusier.

  • @thatGUYbehindthemask
    @thatGUYbehindthemask 5 років тому +6

    they completely forgot about how they can farm fish

    • @davidboesgaard7996
      @davidboesgaard7996 4 роки тому +1

      do u think there is unlimited fish in the ocean

    • @tisntmerealname8824
      @tisntmerealname8824 4 роки тому

      @@davidboesgaard7996 If you farm them, the only ones yanked out of wild population are the initial breeders. Same concept as a fishery, they could in theory increase wild populations with strategic releasing.

  • @izaaksavett9269
    @izaaksavett9269 5 років тому +10

    You think if people from New York City move to those floating cities there gonna stay as clean and nice?

    • @unvergebeneid
      @unvergebeneid 5 років тому

      New Yorkers won't even move to Staten Island. I don't see them move on floating islands any time soon.

    • @roderickstrong3201
      @roderickstrong3201 4 роки тому

      Penny Lane facts 😂

  • @Victor-iy1bz
    @Victor-iy1bz 5 років тому +2

    Would easily live there looks amazing🙌💧

  • @wombatdk
    @wombatdk 5 років тому

    This is a pipe dream for many reasons. Salt water - and its vapor - is _incredibly_ corrosive. Metal rusts faster, non-metal deteriorates faster. Galvanic corrosion is an issue as well. Maintaining these floating communities would be a nightmare.

  • @bomberbinz
    @bomberbinz 5 років тому +7

    Watching that the film "Elysium" comes to mind.

    • @pohkeee
      @pohkeee 5 років тому

      Yeah, and Water World! Could be a real titanic disaster 😬

    • @user-pt1cg9sm5o
      @user-pt1cg9sm5o 5 років тому

      @MIchele Curlee seriously, do u ready read about the Titanic disaster? That doesn't make sense bro lmao

    • @pohkeee
      @pohkeee 5 років тому

      Мир : WaterWorld was apocalyptic....yes, I know the Titanic story very well...started out a triumph of technology, ran into a tragic force of nature. It was a pun...geesh! A superior , godlike design ( see definition of Titanic), brought down by a form of water. ...abstract thinking 🤔 P.S. ...why would we be trusted to take any better care of the ocean, than we have the land? We’ve already gotten a jump start in trashing it...It’s just getting hard to stay positive about human plans with profit higher on the list of priorities than survival...hmmm, kind of reminds me of the lifeboat short Titanic! ✌️🖖

    • @LiquoriceGold
      @LiquoriceGold 5 років тому

      Elysium was in space though more water world

  • @aleksandarminic5059
    @aleksandarminic5059 5 років тому +3

    Tourism definitely, we have all it takes to build it, under water!

  • @jrno93
    @jrno93 4 роки тому

    You guys have been pumping out some real quality content. Either that or the guy who cones up with the thumbnails and titles really kbows what their doing

  • @rust86
    @rust86 5 років тому

    I'm looking forward to seeing you all move out there.

  • @glorysky1998
    @glorysky1998 5 років тому +4

    Wait, if the main cities are going to get the effects of sea rising, does that mean that the cities will be a bunch of Atlantis's thousands of years later...

    • @theimperfectgod7140
      @theimperfectgod7140 5 років тому +1

      "That's a good question"

    • @Bad_Chad
      @Bad_Chad 4 роки тому

      The Imperfect God next up “How close are we to becoming Atlantis” please

  • @magnvss
    @magnvss 5 років тому +8

    Another "we need investors for our flying car" video. That close we are.

    • @gj9157
      @gj9157 5 років тому

      Its not happening

  • @ishbartgonzalezibanez2586
    @ishbartgonzalezibanez2586 5 років тому

    Great video! Thanks so much for the great content!

  • @illturralli
    @illturralli 5 років тому +1

    Then you face the a storm where winds from nothing to hundreds of kilometers an hour and these things just blow away.

  • @farmminer4014
    @farmminer4014 5 років тому +3

    We aren't close at all!! You are not getting any water or liquid to drink there because it takes time and lots of energy to make drinkable anything even with the help of solar panels and such cool stuff you still can't get much water out of that energy.

    • @tobiasL1991
      @tobiasL1991 5 років тому

      What? Reverse osmosis exists and it's not that hard to make use of... The middle east already does that on large scale.

    • @farmminer4014
      @farmminer4014 5 років тому

      @@tobiasL1991 How you get Soo much water out of it to hydrate hundred people in a day?

    • @farmminer4014
      @farmminer4014 5 років тому

      In a small area

    • @tobiasL1991
      @tobiasL1991 5 років тому

      @@farmminer4014 Straight from wikipedia:
      The world's largest RO desalination plant was built in Sorek, Israel, in 2013. It has an output of 624,000 m3 a day. It is also the cheapest and will sell water to the authorities for US$0.58/m3.
      Just look at the price of the water and you'll see it can't be using massive amounts of energy because it would cost vastly more.
      And look at the output, scale is not a problem. So making usable water is very likely one of the smallest problems when talking about cities on water.

    • @farmminer4014
      @farmminer4014 5 років тому

      @@tobiasL1991 floating on ocean? You can't make that huge plant float on top of water also I was talking about those ones what can float on water in middle of a ocean. But I see your point, the thing is is it really plausible to make it middle on a ocean (tsunamis safe etc) one what can hydrate hundred people and and more?

  • @Cellardoor_
    @Cellardoor_ 5 років тому +8

    There's plenty of land to inhabit before we jump into the ocean. We should figure out different terrestrial options first.

  • @kingslayer2553
    @kingslayer2553 5 років тому +2

    Think bigger guys at "BIG architects", we need to become type-1 civilization, so instead of hexagonal floating units, better solid option is land reclaimation, plenty of unused mountains we can cut and fill in the ocean, creating island paradises, since the Earth keeps generating and giving us more earth from volcanoes.

    • @MrAnritco
      @MrAnritco 5 років тому +1

      Remember about the less resistance path rule. It would probably be way more expensive to do that than what these people are proposing.

    • @kingslayer2553
      @kingslayer2553 5 років тому

      @@MrAnritco that's a problem though! Less resistance.. those hexagon units won't resist tsunamis, heavy tidal waves, and bad storms! It's an incredibly tough sell for investors to build entire cities on them! Their investment can sink down the ocean floor, literally speaking!!!

    • @MrAnritco
      @MrAnritco 5 років тому

      @@kingslayer2553 i am not talking about the physical resistance of the elements against the structure itself, but as a rule of thumb that humans follow when it is about investment and effort applied.

    • @kingslayer2553
      @kingslayer2553 5 років тому

      @@MrAnritco yes i gotcha bro nic, we have 8 billion of us plus technology, land reclaimation shoudnt be too difficult. itll be a long term beneficial solution over the stress of living in constant fear and insecurity of the hex floats sinking

  • @tomkelly8827
    @tomkelly8827 2 роки тому

    This sounds like a really interesting plan. I would love to see it in action one day. As far as I know though this has been happening in Lake Titicaca since time out of mind. They build on reed floats of some sort. I am sure there are other places that do this too. Venice must have something, Florida and Netherlands too. As far as livable places in this solar system go though, tropical oceans seem pretty attractive, certainly many steps up form the moon or mars! Also I imagine the water would help to regulate the temperature in the city too.

  • @PantsB4Squares
    @PantsB4Squares 5 років тому +5

    Correction: Living *on* the ocean

  • @FurNaxxYT
    @FurNaxxYT 5 років тому +6

    Imagine just being able to throw plastics directly in the ocean

  • @OFFRoadWheels
    @OFFRoadWheels 5 років тому

    That would be cool to build something like that. Floating cabins you wouldn't need a lot of power it would be a good starter.

  • @TheGuruNetOn
    @TheGuruNetOn 5 років тому

    Best test sites for floating homes would be tourist resorts on lakes. House boats have been around for quite a long time already. Things could be tested with a mobile population that can be evacuated for any serious storm.

  • @juanrobles901
    @juanrobles901 5 років тому +10

    Why did you show Chicago under water if it don't sit nowhere near a coast 🤦‍♂️

    • @Paul-A01
      @Paul-A01 5 років тому +1

      Never let reality get in the way of good fear mongering

    • @communitycollegegenius9684
      @communitycollegegenius9684 5 років тому +1

      Chicago has 28 miles of coastline along Lake Michigan and averages only 20 feet above the lake.

    • @juanrobles901
      @juanrobles901 5 років тому

      I meant an oceanic coast where sea level rise might be a threat.

    • @communitycollegegenius9684
      @communitycollegegenius9684 5 років тому +1

      @@juanrobles901 New Orleans has coastline only along the Mississippi river and Lake Pontchartrain, yet WE BOTH know that those waters are a threat because they are open to the Gulf of Mexico and ultimately the ocean. Since Lake Michigan empties into Huron, Erie, Ontario etc and is open to the ocean via the Saint Lawrence Seaway and Great Lakes Waterway as well as Illinois Waterway to the Gulf of Mexico via the Illinois River (from Chicago) and the Mississippi River. Any rise in ocean levels will back up those rivers and give the snow melt in Lake Michigan no where to go and result in a rise of water levels that could conceivably flood Chicago. We are all connected by our world wide environment, not just isolated communities.

  • @steyn1775
    @steyn1775 5 років тому +3

    Nobody: ...
    Subtitles: C A P S L O C K

  • @jackrollin2662
    @jackrollin2662 4 роки тому

    I’m totally down for the idea, but what I want to know more about is logistics? Of the 300 per neighborhood, how many would work for the sustainability of their lifestyle(farmers, recyclers, waste handlers, ocean farmers, technicians, administration, management, etc.) vs those that would just live there and remotely work? I get that putting multiple together is the end product, but if you really want people to get behind it you need to tell how many people would each neighborhood would actually employ

  • @lukejohnston2390
    @lukejohnston2390 5 років тому

    Whoever makes your thumbnails deserves a raise

  • @aikonomic
    @aikonomic 5 років тому +4

    When they said that you have to become vegan, I knew then that for me, this is never going to happen.

  • @adaptablerubenvideos3097
    @adaptablerubenvideos3097 5 років тому +3

    the 37km one can hold 420k population

    • @FuzzyWuzzy98
      @FuzzyWuzzy98 5 років тому

      *Snoop dog wants to know your location*

  • @NekoNinja13
    @NekoNinja13 5 років тому

    Another awesome idea/concept/project that I am totally on board for and interested in, that will probably not happen in my life time, and or I will not have the ability/time/resources to partake in :(

  • @ReaperCheGuevara
    @ReaperCheGuevara 5 років тому

    Going to space sounds absolutely cool but you know what's better than just plain old cool? We got oceans right here we don't need to go up when we can go down.

  • @ItsGroundhogDay
    @ItsGroundhogDay 5 років тому +6

    We've been told for decades that the world is going to end. At least now it is going to happen in 12 years.

  • @DurzoBlunts
    @DurzoBlunts 5 років тому +5

    Notice they immediately went to resort cities and university $$$$$$$$$$$$
    Smh sad... Research stations for universities as a whole to place labs and scientists on the ocean would make more sense. Rent out labs.

    • @iwiffitthitotonacc4673
      @iwiffitthitotonacc4673 5 років тому

      I really want to live underwater, as it's cooler down there than on the surface and I have severe temperature circulation problems. So if a city like this had an underwater lab, I would immediately volunteer to work in it.

    • @DurzoBlunts
      @DurzoBlunts 5 років тому

      @@iwiffitthitotonacc4673 just have to get cost of ownership reduced for facilities and the technology to make manufacturing said facilities cheaper either on site or barge them to spot and sink em.

  • @dhawthorne1634
    @dhawthorne1634 5 років тому

    A significant design element to be lacking is isolation of the living quarters from outside motion. You don't just need it to be stable enough to stay afloat. There are a lot of technologies, hobbies, games and daily tasks that require or are greatly inhibited by the lack of a level surface. At least a single 12X12 room on each of these housing units should be isolated from the motion of the rest of the structure.

  • @mr.bennett108
    @mr.bennett108 5 років тому

    I think the thing about this that is most ambitious is the lack of defensive strategy, as it assumes an end to human conflict. It assumes that an aggressive party won't attempt to literally sink an entire city. Given the literal billions it would take to develop something like this, it could all be sunk with a well-placed torpedo or sub-ocean nuke. Also...how does it handle Tsunami?

  • @wynnefox
    @wynnefox 5 років тому +5

    Then a hurricane happens and it all over. I live where the ground shakes all the time already. I don't need to live with that and a chance of sinking into it.

  • @ricecrispyman1582
    @ricecrispyman1582 5 років тому +9

    Ok but can you do a flip?

  • @omkeigel
    @omkeigel 5 років тому

    Seeker: Have you ever wanted to build a new world? Everyone: Videogames

  • @halohair1118
    @halohair1118 4 роки тому

    The fractal pattern is the future in general. It is basic yet efficient hence why bees use it. It is why bees and even people in certain societies use it. I love this idea

  • @juzy0314
    @juzy0314 5 років тому +13

    "Stop Eating Animals and Embrace a plant based diet" While there are Trillions of fish beneath their feet.

    • @jakenz88
      @jakenz88 5 років тому +2

      Yeah. That was purely that woman's opinion, she was injecting it into something that should be more professional.

    • @futureaests2170
      @futureaests2170 5 років тому +1

      hardly. The purpose of these cities is to leave the environmental footprint as small as possible. The oceans and shores are helplessly overfished as they are and we can't rely on them as a food source, especially considering that there might be living hundreds of thousand of people in these cities. A plant based diet, maybe accompanied by insects and a small amount of aquaculture seems most likely. But as a start, a plant based diet is simply the most efficient way to eat, due to minimal amounts of trash and carbon emission.

    • @xthrax
      @xthrax 5 років тому +2

      @@futureaests2170 it's not like you couldnt eat fish in a reduced fashion or farm them, you could also use the left overs as compost. Fish have a lot of good nutrients for plants after all

    • @bri1085
      @bri1085 5 років тому

      @@xthrax we hardly leave any waste when eating fish.

    • @xthrax
      @xthrax 5 років тому

      @@bri1085 bones, scales, organs, etc. those are barley, if ever eaten.

  • @mervjohnson8010
    @mervjohnson8010 5 років тому +25

    You had me until you said "no meat" diet. lol Import beef and chicken. Hell, at least fish!

    • @Dell-ol6hb
      @Dell-ol6hb 5 років тому +2

      Merv Johnson it’s because it would be impossible to live full sustainably by having livestock, because livestock eat most of the food a civilization produces so it’s very inefficient, so it’d make sense that they would cut it out to save resources, I’m not a vegan at all btw I love meat, I’m just explaining why they’d want to have a meat only diet.

    • @Ceeckoful
      @Ceeckoful 4 роки тому

      @@JamecBond Meatard ass wipes are very annoying, enslaving animals and destroying the environment for everyone just so that eat a burger they don't even need all while calling others annoying and selfish, egotistical without having the self awareness to grasp that vegans value others over their own ego unlike meat eaters

  • @FuzzyWuzzy98
    @FuzzyWuzzy98 5 років тому

    To resupply the cities they could use automated mini cargo submarines to deliver all the supplies they need like clothes, medicines, tech and most important *meat* . When the sub is empty it would return to its supply point and await further orders.
    They could even be hung over the edge of cargo ships and as the ships arrive at a port, if the port has a floating city then the subs could load up supplies, drop from the ship and make it's way to the settlement, unload it's goods and return to it's mother ship without the ship itself having to stop or change course.

  • @ElijahPerrin80
    @ElijahPerrin80 5 років тому

    fantastic show, a great idea to open up options for colonization away from the land so the land can heal and grow again. One technology they mentioned was OTEC or oceanic thermal energy conversion or the best form of solar energy that also mines minerals and metals from the ocean and produce water along with supporting a fish hatchery is what I call it. This topic alone deserves its own show along with Plasma gasification of waste streams that would help this venture greatly and plastic harvesting from the ocean for energy.