German aircraft carrier Graf Zeppelin in 3D
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 лис 2024
- German aircraft carrier Graf Zeppelin in a series of fly-around 3D animations.
My website: www.bismarck3d.pl
My shop: bismarck3d.red...
My Instagram: / bismarck3d
My UA-cam: / @kapitanpi88
Contact me at: stefan@bismarck3d.pl
Imagine Hearing a Stuka Siren In a middle of an ocean...
The Brits had the Blackburn Skua , which , minus the siren could have been the closest thing
Kowabanga it is
Ju-87 were used for Sea strikes plenty of times
The Stuka was used a lot in ocean battles, I mean Dunkirk is an obvious use, off the coast of Africa, France, and Italy stukas were all used, pretty scary
Oshut...
*Graf Zeppelin never completed*
Kriegsmarine: D:
Luftwaffe: :D
They said interservice rivalries are essential for an armed forces...
*Until war escalated...*
No wonder never heard of it
@@bakaweiner6956 that said, take it from my countries experience, the idea of merging branches horrible.
The Russians seized it after WW2 and sank it during target practice. They were making plans to sink US aircraft carriers based on what they learned from it. No wonder the Russian navy is so misinformed.
@@williamhaynes4800 wow that's really dumb. They could have used it as their own CV
There would have been a lot of pilots happy at her never being completed, because they never had to try landing their spindly legged bf109s on a flight deck violently pitching in a heavy sea.
Yeah the bf109 would have been a real pig to land on a carrier, the stall speed wasn't to good as well as the landing gear problem, neither did it have great glide characteristics.
The FW190 would have been a much better choice. Robust air-frame and with some engineering it likely could have had folding wings.
Look to the Royal Navy. The Spitfire has the same small landing gear similar to the Me109 !
And it works.
The pilots from the Luftwaffe who where on board were high traint specialists, no greenhorn's just out of flying school.
So I think, it had worked.
@@markusfrombgen2967 How many squadrons of Seafires did the Royal Navy have at the end of the war, about 2. The rest of the fighter squadrons were equiped with Hellcats and Corsairs.
@Robert Hogan The higher landing speed of the FW 190 would pose a problem with landing it on a carrier.
@@markusfrombgen2967
No the gear on the spitfire was stronger.
Not the same !
Just similar in lay out.
ME109 was terrible to land and maneuver on the ground.
most peple dont realize what a beautiful ship it was!!!
HDSME yes its beutiful but it was pure evil
@@koylert1327 How can a ship that is not alive be evil? oO
Sadly, today most people wouldn't say that the design is beautiful. They would say that it is an abomination because it has the Nazi symbol on it.
@@kmsprinzeugen1304 Yeah, it's sad.
I love this ship thare for I shall build it out of cardboard and post it on my UA-cam channel
American, British and Japanse aircraft carriers have multiple aircraft for very specific tasks.
Only German carrier that never left the dry dock: Stuka take it or leaf it
The grey planes upfront and last to be seen, were fighters
And for services that fielded carriers, not only did they carry a mix of aircraft for different roles, but the aircraft were _designed_ to be carrier launched, and differed from land based variants.
the ME 109 would of been worse then the Spitfire as a carrier aircraft
@@daniellastuart3145 Yes! Offhand, I doubt an ME109 would have been _able_ to take off from a carrier. It needed a longer strip to get airborne. Current carriers have catapults to toss aircraft into the sky, but that innovation didn't occur till well after WWII.
@@dennismccunney4462 also it had terrible pilot coppit sight lines on the ground
I really want a movie of Graf Zeppelin. I know it's impossible, but the cinematic effect would be breathtaking.
@plentyness Guess u need some imagination on fiction stories. Btw chill out, why so serious
It isnt impossible, throw in a ship-loving staff, give em coffee and leave them be for 3-4 years
@plentyness well, considering this was a first carrier attempt for Germany, it definitely was far practical than initial designs of other nations and therefore deserves some praise
Ikr
@plentyness LOL!!! No, no BB conversion, designed from the start as a CV and using IJN input, who in turn had been assisted by the RN...
Find a decent book.
Impressive ship, impressive work. Thank you sir.
the SONG is “plus le temps” by refa for those Asking
you deserve a medal
danke ;)
don't believe it, he's lying that's not the title of the soundtrack
Actually there is a UA-cam video called Plus Le Temps by Resfa, but it turns out that it's two music tracks cobbled together. The real title for this song is Procession, in the UA-cam Audio Library.
I searched for Graf Zeppelin hentai some days ago, apparently UA-cam knows that.
Ok
Mister I play Azur lane
I see that your a man of culture as well...
@@historystorieswithreggie2865 oh no
This is something that Essex-chan would have turned into a hentai fest.
Lmao
I feel ya man
Wow! this German world war two aircraft carrier looks stunning in 3d, better then the US or Japanese aircraft carriers. You should try the Project 10581 of the Soviet navy, a design proposal of battleship-aircraft carrier jointly designed by US and Russia prior two world war two.
No. Akagi looks the most imposing with all the complexity of her hull. Japanese and American carrier based aircraft were better than German ones.
in my opinion the italian aircraft carrier aqulia was the most beautiful of the all looking the most sleak and well desigend
Many of the WW2 carriers were former heavy cruisers modified into carriers, due to the Washington naval treaty. Such frankenships obviously might not be aesthetically the most pleasant ones.
I agree
@@herrakaarme Not just heavy cruisers, a battleship can be modified into carriers. Haven't heard about Shinano? She was made from Yamato-class battleship hull. She displaced 65,800 metric tons (64,800 long tons) at standard load, 69,151 metric tons (68,059 long tons) at normal load and 73,000 metric tons (72,000 long tons) at full load. Shinano was the heaviest aircraft carrier yet built, a record she held until the 81,000-metric-ton (80,000-long-ton) USS Forrestal was launched in 1954.
Music is perfect; nostalgic, with a hint of pride and honor
The CV6 USS Enterprise please, the most decorated war ship of USA.
wow that low-slung bridge/island would have been probably a nightmare to conduct operations from.
I think that's just where they pilot the CV I'm guessing the area that's on the mast behind is the control tower for planes like with Britain's CV
@@panthir6720 still too small
Imagine the Flight Control being just one centimeter away from the Flight Deck
Germany: years of academy training wasted
Shame the USA is following the same path today
@@captsirl why?
@@captsirl why
@@captsirl Why
It’s scary to think what if they had grew there army for like 4 or 5 more years
*This is where men cried*
Yes
😢
Good !!!! .... I'd love to see NAZIs (and Confederates) crying
@@goobfilmcast4239 air thief.
@@alejandrobustos693 You mean he's a waste of resources on earth don't ya?
She was truly a magnificent ship
Amazing! The ju 87 would be the C variant on the Graf zeppelin it would have foldable wings and could carry a torpedo. I also think they made a design for a bf 109 with foldable wings
No, the Ju 87C couldnt carry a torpedo, the E would have.
The 109T, the foldinh mechanism was welded and the aircraft used from land when the carrier was abandoned
@Captain Germany The Cesar could not AFAIK, many trials were made with several weapons and none of the loadouts recorded include a torpedo, bombload was usually restricted to 500Kg because the Stuka required drop tanks due to its small internal tanks.
Do you have a source?
@Captain Germany Here is a pic of the E with torpedoes:
www.asisbiz.com/il2/Ju-87/Ju-87D/images/Junkers-Ju-87V25-Stuka-Stammkennzeichen-BK+EF-WNr-48928-LT-5w-torpedo-2x300-litre-tanks-04.jpgdAAAAABAH
The C had a larger radiator which would have gotten in the way.
And here one of the Ju 87C loadouts from its taggeblatt:
Plus the Fi 167 was the intended torpedo bomber.
@@trauko1388 the Ju 87C could carry a torpedo just didn't have much reason to
The Fieseler Fi 167 was the torpedo plane for the Graf Zeppelin.
The FW 190 would be a much better choice for a navy fighter.
Fw190 was in production from 1941, graf zep was laid down in 1936, so the bf109 was the only choice
How long did I take you to model that entire thing? It's amazing! :O
The whole thing show the krauts had no idea what they were doing when it came to aircraft carrier design, Good grief air operated catapults that could launch 14 aircraft and the require 50 minutes to recharge. Never mind the idea of the heavy anti ship battery. Last thing you want is your carriers in a surface battle. This is an absurd ship. Not even the IJN did such stupid stuff.
@@emilkarpo You do realize for what it was designed right? The guns make sense as Graf Zeppelin wasn't designed to counter ships. It was planned to hunt merchant ships for which these guns would have been more than capable to do the job. Also the Graf Zeppelin is the only carrier at it's time with an catapult so that it isn't working perfectly is understandable....
THIS SHIP was the prettest no wonder it took so long the aircraft were the poblem
she was a beauty
I believe Goring was the problem. He insisted on controlling all military air including naval aircraft. The Germans didn't finish development of naval designs before the invasion of the Soviet Union. Once they were fighting on two fronts, three really when you include the Mediterranean & North Africa, they couldn't complete work on Graf Z due to shortages of materiel, engineers, etc. Hitler lost faith in surface combatants after the loses of Graf Spee, Blucher & Bismarck, as well as the damage to Gneisenau & Scharnhorst.
She probably would not have had Swastika's painted on her deck. The Bismarck only had them on for a few hours of her life so she wasn't accidently bombed by friendly aircraft as she made her way to the sea. Once there they were painted over.
Why would the Kriegsmarine paint over the swastikas at all? Well, I can see why, Too Much of an Identifying target. It would actually be Stupid to leave them as they'd identify it for German 5 miles away as Big as they were no aircraft could miss those.
This video is so well made, it feels like a tribute to a ship that actually existed rather than one that was only a concept
It did exist but just sat around because no aircraft planes were made for it and the guns were torn off.
Wow Digital Art in Museum Quality!! I am really impressed .😃
Stand by for all the "IF's"
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
ok normie
@@darklysm8345 He wasn't wrong. Kinda said how right he is actually... Every other comment has it.
@David Rodríguez Rodríguez who cares
@David Rodríguez Rodríguez i dont even use reddit
The captain if this ship was a lucky man
Yes i know it didnt sail but still
Even if the captain voyage, if........Hitler is smarter in naval warfare. This ship will sail together(supposed to) with Bismarck and his sister ship Tirpitz(should have sail together), Prinz Eugen.
These supposed to be the world strongest fleet. If these fleet manages to sail together to the Atlantic sea and cut allies supply line, the allies will surrender as they are out of supply and supressed to starvation. Bismarck sailing alone(Prinz Eugen leaving the escort) is one in a million chance. Hence why every asset is thrown to hunt him.
Just to give you an insight of the butterfly effect if this ship is finished and Kriegsmarine officer is following Hitler order to stand down and not sail the Bismarck alone.
That is until it took four torpedoes amid ships.
@@vernscheck2658 which is quite strong. Considering most ship at that era will go in one hit. Yamato, for instance. The citadel is the strongest.
@@dreoutcasting4415 who cares about an invulnerable citadel if your ship just becomes a floating wreck and mission-killed beyond any practical repair lol
Das ist sehr schoene Flugzeugtraeger!
Imagine instead of aircraft it's panzer lol
Panzer Carrier (but on land)
@@jmdoza3938 Lemon mao
Amphibious Assault Carrier, don't give the german high command more ideas
" Who needs an aircraft carrier, when all of Europe is already our air field?."
Herman Goering. ( Just joking.)
The actually had plans for Stukas with folding wings and tail hooks. Same with Me 109s..
Why was this not finished?
Bismarck, Tirpitz, Graf Zepplin, Graf Spree and a bunch of destroyers would be a good force.
Completely agree, such a shame that such a task force would likely drain germany of oil even faster than real life.
Totally a good force for the Ally. Germany's decision of opting for such a strategy of setting priorities for its rescources would be a godsent bliss for the Ally, whose victory would be much expedited. As for "why", the answer is that Hitler was not a spy secretly working for the Ally.
Hitler didn’t understand naval warfare and while there were many good German ships they, like almost all German equipment, were over engineered. They were absolutely beautiful warships. British warships were utilitarian and spare but built for seamanship. The officer corps more likely to attack despite odds and engage while closing distance. The German Navy was instructed to avoid clashes with British capital ships. It’s understandable since Britain started the war with many.
Along with Scharnhorst and Gneisanau.
Awesome recreation! It’s a shame that she was never completed and commissioned. It would have been interesting to see her in action. If she had been commissioned, maybe there would have been a “navalized” version of the FW-190? And a torpedo bomber version of the Stuka? 🇩🇪
Really???? .... the thought of NAZIs crashing into the sea and drowning is AWESOME !!!!
It only wasn’t completed by 1940 (intended completion year) because they invaded Norway, and needed the Kriegsmarine to defend Norway, thus, they couldn’t defend the carrier. Simply not enough escort ships.
If Hitler only knew that those aircraft carriers would be the true dominance of the sea, and battleships were just dinosaur fossils....
Love the music they chose to put over the presentation of a ship that would have been used to spread terror over the globe...
The Graf Zeppelin would need atleast half a dozrn destroyers and one or two Battleships (BB, BC, Heavy/ Light Cruiser) as Escort.
Also Britain and the USA had Sea Superiority in the Atlantic so it would be a Death Wish sending it out.
Bismarck was never intended to set sail and as it happened "The Chancellor" was furious and after the Sinking of the Bismarck all fundings were cut short.
Isn't that ultimately the goal of every warship ever, or are you just saying that cause it was a german ship?
@Bernard de Fontaines What races and nations did they exterminate again?
The music made the entire video better
Name music?
can anyone tell me, what is the background music ? Thanks
@Johnston Steiner SS Marchiert In feidesland
@@felix_halcs123 are you sure that's A background music
@@muhammadilhamsenasagara hehehe I don’t think so lol
Plus le temps resfa
@@lhnllucena9636 you lying bro
As far as I know, there is no more beautiful aircraft carrier than her.
What a beauty she is.
the real Oneesan
As my submariner buddy , a torpedo tech would say nice target .
Everybody: Haha germany best navy in ww2
The USN: Allow us to introduce ourselves.
@@JacobA6464 The Germans are at best 5th most powerful naval combatant only because the British destroyed a huge chunk of the French Navy.
Amazing as always Stefan. Please pan just a bit slower.
Awesome work.
Agrre, but you can regulate la speed as well with the options, but doesnt look as good
Glorious :') Imagine what could have been.
i think there are more planes than normal...
Fenomenal
Goering to Raeder: "What model aircraft would have been the best to fly off der Graf ....?"
Satan: "Give it a rest already fellas!"
I like to think that in an alternate history instead of prop planes on those it would’ve been a bunch of ho229s and me262s and maybe a couple of ar234s (basically a bunch of jets instead of prop planes on those German carriers) I mean could you imagine just how breathtaking a picture of a ho229 flying high above the sea with a carrier in the background during the sunset would look
this fantasy include the carrier and all its aircraft sitting idly in the middle of the ocean because they did not have enough fuel for any of them lol.
One thing that's always baffled me, is that in order to fold the wings on the BF109s, they had to take the ailerons off first, when taking the planes below to the hanger. Unlike the British Seafires [aka Spitfires], where you could leave them on when folding their wings. As for the JU87s with their fixed undercarriage, they were detached by the crew if the plane had to put down in the sea.
There is no clear info on how the folding mechanism worked n the 109.
The Ju 87 landing gear had explosive BOLTS to dispose of it.
Want to watch a cool video of a wing-folding Messerschmitt?
Know what I love most about the music? It's no music of pure evil which I would have suspected for a german ship good job
I agree. I also hate how when they show communist equipment they play heroic music even though communism is evil. As an American I think many of us don't wanna admit we allied ourselves with bad guys. At least we dissuaded the Red Army from taking over all of Europe, though.
WarParty! At the Outpost the nazis deserved to lose, and it’s a good thing they did.
@@qwerty30013 considering how poorly the US performed I'd say not
Plus le temps resfa
Germans building ships: I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OR DESIGN ISSUES, MAKE IT AS BEAUTIFUL AS POSSIBLE!!!
It looks like a fucking turd, what the hell are you talking about?
@@JacobA6464 you just don't see it...
@@vermas4654 This makes the Nelson look sexy. And the Nelson was ugly.
What else can I say except for it's beautiful
Nice model 😁
Awesome load out
If the Jerry's got this ship built and put to sea with the rest of the combined fleet it would have been a major problem for the Brits. The main aircraft on the Brits many carriers were vary slow bi-wing Sword Fish, Stuka's could have tore those planes up after and even before they went out on their anti ship missions, then they were equipping their carrier with a squadron of ME109's; it would have been a formidable ship.
and there is the fact that the british carriers themselves sucked.
Your forgetting something you weraboo. British Carriers also had fighters on to them. In addition ME109 and Stukas weren’t carriers aircraft making it extremely hard to land them onto aircraft carriers. Also, how could a nation with no aircraft carrier experience use the aircraft carrier in its correct role. The idea was really dumb, and the British carriers did not suck, with the Germans using British design to make the carrier.
MincedMango! You know the Graf Zeppelin was based off British carriers?
The thing is you know what happened to most German service raiders in 1940-1941? They mostly got stuck in Brest or got sunk. If let’s just say Graf Zeppelin somehow does a successful raid of British shiping then it will end up in Brest. Brest was already getting bombed to bits and it will get bombed even more. The British forces in the channel would be reenforced making a channel dash like what they did irl more harder. Even if they do survive Brest and the Channel dash they would end up in the Baltic or Norway. The best thing the Graf Zeppelin would do is try to hit the artic convoys with there planes. The Graf zeppelin wouldn’t have been a good idea
@@m1garand903 The Jerry's couldn't mount a naval force big enough to go against the Royal Navy, or the Yanks, especially when they combined forces, they would have been better off building Commerce raiders and long range submarines instead of cruisers, pocket battle ships, or aircraft carriers. They didn't have the time, or resources to commit to it by 1940, they needed at least another 6-7 years without being in an active land war to sufficiently build and operate a viable blue water navy.
Good
Nice video, thanks!
But 109s on a carrier...naaa
Stukas would probably work with folded wings
FW-190 adopter for carrier use, yes
A fleet of these would’ve been a game changer
Useless fact: The aircraft slated for the Graf Zeppelin were the Bf-109T and the Junkers Ju-87C. Both aircraft existed and were repurposed after the Graf Zeppelin was decomissioned.
Fuckin great design! German knew how to build things sexy in a star wars manner!
Great video. Probably a "maritime camouflage would been used on the planes instead of the RLM colors used in the video?
@Herbert B. Bondsh Good point. But I have seen a paint scheme for a Bf-109T that looked a little like US Navy Hellcat colors, blue over gray. However, it was a drawing. I am looking for it now.
Would have been interesting to see if BF-109's or JU-87's could have operated from her!
Great . Looked more modern than British carriers of the same time.
Beautiful
There is also wisdom why it did not have time to be completed. To avoid a similar fate with the Great Japanese battleships, Yamato and Musashi.
NICE!!!!!
Wow amazing work . and thanks for sharing .
What an excellent overview
That's a lot of Stukas but it makes sense to pack your carriers with dive bombers, since they were so effective...and the stuka was one of the best.
@John Savino Indeed, think about a couple of these babies doing a raid on Scapa Flow at the beginning of the war...Some things would have been different.
@@gilbertoescamilla2993 Lmfao, keep dreaming.
@@gilbertoescamilla2993
Of course things would have been different: The Luftwaffe would have 30-ish less Stukas.
Do you have any idea how suicidal an attack on Scapa Flow would have been? Not only do you need to avoid the Cruisers and Destroyer Patrols (which would eviscerate the Carrier if they detected it), you also have to avoid British Carriers as well.
GUYS THE SONG IS PLUS LE TEMPS!!!!!!!!
don't believe it, he's lying that's not the title of the soundtrack
The real name ist: Procession - Geographer
This.... is perfect
I honestly dont know why they didnt finished it, considering that 90% was already completed. Documents showed that the british feared a formation of the Graf Zeppelin and the Bismarck. And while nobody knows how the ship would have performed in the war, it would have been a deadly combination on paper.
The Nazi simply didnt have the mindset. Plus they had a romance with U boat back then at WW1. The Naval treaty back then also prevent the German from adding the fleet-including the aircraft carrier.
For a carrier, she surely armed to teth
Fabulous video.
Thank you.
People seem to think this ship would have been some behemoth. Truth is, outside of the type-21 submarine German naval production between WWI and WWII as well as during WW II was shoddy. Bismarck is exhibit A. She weighs almost as much as an Iowa and does far less with that tonnage. She is slower, less armed and less armored. Her range is greatly reduced in comparison and her AA ability as well as her torpedo resistance are all grossly inferior.
Post war analysis of Prinz Eugen showed that for all of extra tonnage she was not as good a cruiser as the pre-war New Orleans class, which she weighed 25% more than. Indeed, in any gun engagement with a Brooklyn class US light cruiser, Prinz Eugen would likely lose. Destroyers follow the same disparity.
But Graf Zepplin at 33,000 tons she is roughly the same size as an Essex class carrier and she carries one third of the planes. Then if we compare planes. Stuka versus an SBD or later designs is going to be awful for the Germans. F4F, F4U and F6F will eat up navalized bf-109s. Never mind that the Germans had no design at all for a torpedo bomber.
The Bf 109T was later used from land bases as is, but missing is the Fw 190 and Arado scout planes.
What a glorious ship
Stunning!!
with those port holes you can mistake it for a cruise ship, not a war ship lol!
man this video makes her look more beautiful than she originally was
What if Graf Zeppelin was finished and flew with Bismarck to battle along with Prinz Eugen and U-boats? Royal Navy would received a fatal blow.
Imagine if they already produced and commisioned it before the outbreak of the war and few got sent to the Pacific or East Coast USA as a carrier task force to attack the USN anchorage with Stukas. Imagine the look of the USN sailors when they hear the sirens
Lol...should'a could'a would'a
The Kriegsmarine Admirals including Erich Raeder,Günther Lüthens,etc are expecting for the war to start in 1944 because they know that their Navy is weak and they have plans to build the H-Klasse battleships with Plan Z and expand their Navy to equally battle the Royal Navy and return as one the Naval powers before WW1 apparently The war started too soon for the Kriegsmarine.
The "imperial march" would have been better background music😂
When was she due to be completed? The FW/190 would have been the plane of choice powered by a radial engine that can be changed much faster is air cooled and much lighter than an inline engine.
It would have not won the war but it would make things at sea interesting!
Greatest 1:46 minutes of my life.
Really ???.... the thought of NAZIs crashing into the sea and drowning is AWESOME !!!!
cast luckily more americans did than germans
@@chrisigoeb I assume you are not American....too bad for you !!!!....keep dreaming
@@goobfilmcast4239 someone is offended her. Too bad I didnt lose against rice farmers your right xD
damn look at all those secondaries.
I like this ship
I like it because its catapult system is unique.
I like the system for launching system.
This system is a video content.
Animation of this aircraft carrier fighting in the fjord.
The catapult and trolley backing system is running in this animation.
The animation is episode 7 of "Syuumatu no izzeta(終末のイゼッタ)".
It takes about 15 or 20 minutes.
When I saw this scene, I fell in love with this ship.
グラーフツェッペリンだ！すげ〜！
A lot a similarity with yours with the big metal props holding up the flight deck at the front end
Leave to the Germans to make any machine a beautiful construct.
And for usa and soviets to build 10 by the time Germans get that one done.
@Captain Germany If they made 10 times as many tanks as Germany and 70% those are broken at any given time, they would still have three times as many tanks working.
Que bonito
Awesome.
She makes both an incomplete and a full, operational appearance in Izetta: The Last Witch
I wish to sail with that :(
As a member of the Nazi German Armed Forces? That’ll be a no for me, dawg
your CG modeling is excellence,
Graf Zeppelin is always a great what-if ship.
Well done!
Had she been built and put to sea, she would've carried various FW-190 variants for air defense and anti-ship/ground attack.
Sehr gut!!!
It's a good thing this vessel wasn't ever operational. The 5.9" armament was a waste of space and resources you wouldn't bring a carrier to a gunfight, it's strength was in her air group. The Royal Navy didn't have a carrier fighter worthy of the name at sea until August '42 and the stukas had no equal in the RN.
In fairness to the Germans, this was their first CV and in that light, it was FAR better than first CVs of other nations. But yeah, it would've been just combat ineffective, just like the rest of the German navy throughout the war
This is so cool!!!
Apart from the mass of potholes, looks like a contemporary Carrier.
the rendering is pretty
Excelente buque y tengo el Bismarck H-39 con piesa de artillería 406 mlm muy bueno este acorazado
love your music choice may I adk for the title ?
So Many of us want to know but there is No reply in 2 years, not a good way to gather subscribers.
HEY GUYS "THE MUSIC IS PLUS LE TEMPS RESFA"
Plus le temps
resfa
@@lhnllucena9636
don't believe it, he's lying that's not the title of the soundtrack
Bf 109’s undertaking carrier operations with that landing gear system is hilarious 😂
Better than the Spitfire's LOL!!!
@@trauko1388 - LOL the Bf-109’s narrow and weak landing gear was notorious throughout the Luftwaffe for killing pilots. In 1939, there were 255 ground loop accidents by Bf-109’s. Although the Spit’s landing gear were also on the narrow side, they were stronger.
@@petersouthernboy6327 LOL!!! The Spitfire and for that matter the WILDCAT'S landing gear were NARROWER than the Bf 109...
Moreover, Messerschmitt spent TWO YEARS modifying and strengthening the landing gear to make it suitable for carrier operations and undertook 1.800 arrested landings to ensure the plane could take it, plus they added spoilers, a new wing, new flaps, etc...
The Spitfire got a hook and a pat in the back, which is why it sucked as a carrier aircraft! XD
@@trauko1388 And just how many combat missions did the 109T make flying from a carrier??? Zero? While the Seafire flew how many??? Right.
@@pararaftanr2 LOL!!! Ok then, the Bf 109 never killed any pilots landing on a carrier due to shitty characteristics... lol!!!!