The 5 Styles of Directing Actors
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 лип 2024
- Every directors works with actors differently, but there are 5 main 'schools' or approaches. In this video we break down the advantages and disadvantages of each.
════════════════════════
🅾 𝙁𝙄𝙇𝙈𝙈𝘼𝙆𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙏𝙊𝙊𝙇𝙎
Pro Cinema Training: canonmasterclass.com
════════════════════════
🅾 𝙍𝙐𝘽𝙄𝘿𝙄𝙐𝙈'𝙎 𝙎𝙀𝙏𝙐𝙋
════════════════════════
🅾 𝘾𝙊𝙉𝙉𝙀𝘾𝙏 𝙒𝙄𝙏𝙃 𝙐𝙎
Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/crimsonengine...
Insta: / crimson_engine
Book: / crimsonengine
Tweet: / crimsonengine
Web: crimsonengine.com
════════════════════════
🅾 𝘾𝙍𝙄𝙈𝙎𝙊𝙉 𝙀𝙉𝙂𝙄𝙉𝙀
Canon Masterclass - Фільми й анімація
"They use a lot of wide shots to show the grandeur of their vision" got me laughing way harder than it should have xD
There's a hilarious parody of this in Altman's The Player, w Richard E Grant fiercely pitching his "vision" to Tim Robbins, w Dean Stockwell acting as the "referee" lol
The first example of directing actors showed clips from movie Vicky Cristina Barcelona by Woody Allen, who is famous for just casting the right actor for the role and saying almost nothing to them before or during the shooting. And he gets amazing performances from the performers!
I think you can be all of these whitout issue.
Not sure that i agree on these classifications but i i where to accept them for the sake of argument i feel there is at least alot of crossover between them.
I’ve been directing for 13 years.. I feel like I dabble in all of these areas
That was a really interesting summary. Thanks.
Me resultó muy útil y aprendí más que cualquier otro, gracias
Interesting. Thank you for this overview.
This was really useful
Thank you 😊
Excellent
Nice!
My two main priorities are the ACTION and PERFORMANCES.
Interesting, In my experience most Directors invoke all these aspects and everything in between. Whatever the approach, the Director is the head creative leader and makes the final decision. When Directors don't, the film collapses
Great input. But I strongly disagree on the "directing actors is the most important job". A good film is more than just a performance of an actor. It's the directors most important job to know how important each and every department is and how to use all of these tools in coherence to tell the story with everything at their disposal. Hitchcocks films for example aren't great, because he could direct actors well. He most importantly knew what to show in the viewer at what time in what way and angle to provoke a certain thought, emotion or perception. I think this craft gets lost in todays world and leads to the flood of boring and less than average movies.
I agree in most of what you say, but watch a technically well made film with amateur acting. I would rather watch a below par technically poor film with natural acting, than a wooden acting team with great visuals.
Really good video but a quick note, Spielberg does NOT rehearse.
often "Actor's Directors" come from a stage background. Their work tends to be a bit more play-like in nature.
Tarantino comes from the theater but he is a very visual director.
@@NostalgiNorden although he starred in theatre work, he didnt really 'come from the theatre' in the same way wed talk about someone like daniel day lewis
This dude has a strong neck
Been a Director for a decade and always thought of myself as an "Actor's Director" but when you did your description, I feel I'm more of a "Collaborative Director." I emphasis on team work. A trusting collaborator.
And I am a Autocratical, Technical and Actor's director haha
Then there’s Scorsese, who’s all the above.
5 estilos de directores. No de directores de actores