Wow. That’s a steal. I’ve always dreamed about finding really high-quality, expensive Nikon lenses at yard sales or something like that. Haha. No such luck yet. I think the glass on these Tamron lenses are pretty good but the only thing I had a genuine complain about was the slow auto focus. The focus motor in that thing is just pretty slow but if you don’t need superfast focusing it’s fine.
I was luckier. Got one at auction for minus $500, that's right, they paid me to take it away. Turned out to be a special anniversary model with gold plated bits. So there.
There were versions of this lens in Nikon F mount with aperture ring. They must be pre-2000s. They should be great for adapting, I have a FUJI X-T10 and using all my old Nikon mount lenses.
Thanks for the review and photo links. I just picked up the same kind of deal... never used new in box Canon version on eBay for $200. Hopefully, it works as well as yours. I bought the 2 yr squaretrade warranty for $47 as I think Tamron warranty expired and non authorized reseller. Looks like you really got your money worth. Thanks again for the video!!!
Hello i want this lens or simmilar 18-200 or 28-300 foe my sony a6000 i need adapter please tell me will it work and which ones can i use. Thank you very much !!!
Bgvolley Sony makes an 18-135 for the E mount. It would be a 27-202 equivalent. They also make an 18-200 which is like 27-300. Tamron also makes an 18-200 for the Sony E mount.
For a crop sensor camera like the Canon you mentioned, this would be the equivalent lens to the one I show in the video: www.tamron-usa.com/lenses/prod/18200_B018.php#ad-image-0 The 28 to 300 I show in the video is designed for full frame sensor cameras. The 18 to 200 in the link I posted is the equivalent lens for your camera to the 28 to 300 I talk about.
Tamron makes a Canon mount version but I believe the 60D is an APS-C size sensor which means the 28-300 full frame lens like this would be a longer focal length....for example, 42-450 or something like that.
I'm surprised you wouldn't take the X-T1 with 18-135mm on vacation instead. WR would be useful. I'm certain the Fujinon glass is superior to that old Tamron.
@@riandhy6018 The Tamron is perfectly fine optically. It's not as good as the Nikon 28-300 but it's still good. The focusing on it is a little slow though and also the VC (image stabilization) is a little slower to engage and noisier, but other than that it's a good lens in general. I think it's actually made in Japan too. I think so...
Thanks for the video. I lucked out this week and bought this at an estate auction for $11. It was in the original box and didn't have a scratch on it.
Wow. That’s a steal. I’ve always dreamed about finding really high-quality, expensive Nikon lenses at yard sales or something like that. Haha. No such luck yet. I think the glass on these Tamron lenses are pretty good but the only thing I had a genuine complain about was the slow auto focus. The focus motor in that thing is just pretty slow but if you don’t need superfast focusing it’s fine.
I was luckier. Got one at auction for minus $500, that's right, they paid me to take it away. Turned out to be a special anniversary model with gold plated bits. So there.
There were versions of this lens in Nikon F mount with aperture ring. They must be pre-2000s. They should be great for adapting, I have a FUJI X-T10 and using all my old Nikon mount lenses.
Have this lens is this full frame lens
Thanks for the review and photo links. I just picked up the same kind of deal... never used new in box Canon version on eBay for $200. Hopefully, it works as well as yours. I bought the 2 yr squaretrade warranty for $47 as I think Tamron warranty expired and non authorized reseller. Looks like you really got your money worth. Thanks again for the video!!!
Thank you
Hello i want this lens or simmilar 18-200 or 28-300 foe my sony a6000 i need adapter please tell me will it work and which ones can i use. Thank you very much !!!
Bgvolley Sony makes an 18-135 for the E mount. It would be a 27-202 equivalent. They also make an 18-200 which is like 27-300. Tamron also makes an 18-200 for the Sony E mount.
I dont want Sony lenses are expensive for me,i can get cheap those other ones ...
Do you think it is compatible with a Canon EOS Rebel T5?
For a crop sensor camera like the Canon you mentioned, this would be the equivalent lens to the one I show in the video: www.tamron-usa.com/lenses/prod/18200_B018.php#ad-image-0 The 28 to 300 I show in the video is designed for full frame sensor cameras. The 18 to 200 in the link I posted is the equivalent lens for your camera to the 28 to 300 I talk about.
Thank you so much!
great video on this lens. I just bought a used one based on your 6 year old review.
Thank you, enjoy the lens. :)
I’ve always thought it was really good optically, but just a little slow for auto focus
how dose it works with Nikon D610 camera ?
how photos will come
It would work fine on the D610 as well. I've also used it on a Nikon D750.
How Would it work on a cannon Eos 60D?
Tamron makes a Canon mount version but I believe the 60D is an APS-C size sensor which means the 28-300 full frame lens like this would be a longer focal length....for example, 42-450 or something like that.
Thank you for the video. It helped.. the photos you Ajit with this was excellent 👌🏻
Cyril Idicula Thank you
Great Photos!
I'm surprised you wouldn't take the X-T1 with 18-135mm on vacation instead. WR would be useful. I'm certain the Fujinon glass is superior to that old Tamron.
I'm taking both this summer :-). And yes the 18-135 is a better lens in all areas.
Hooked on Photography really
Tamron AF 28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical [IF] Macro
is this lens sharp for sports ??????????????
Danny Diet I would say overall it's reasonably sharp for a 'super zoom'. For my purposes, it's perfectly fine and more than acceptable.
And how does Tamron AF28-300 F3/3.5 -5.6 compares with Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Telephoto Lens
Danny Diet I'm not sure. I've never used the 70-300.
Hooked on Photography is this AF 28-300 f/3.5 6.3 can work on fullframe??
Danny Diet Yes this lens is intended for full frame 35mm cameras. If used on an APS-C body, you'd have to multiply the focal length by 1.5 times.
comparing to nikon.. which one is more sharper?
Riandhy I have the Nikon version now. The Nikon version is much better overall. Sharp, etc. I love it.
@@ThePhotographyHobbyist i want to buy the mint tamron lens.. will you recommend it..? because its budget lens..especially about sharpness
@@riandhy6018 The Tamron is perfectly fine optically. It's not as good as the Nikon 28-300 but it's still good. The focusing on it is a little slow though and also the VC (image stabilization) is a little slower to engage and noisier, but other than that it's a good lens in general. I think it's actually made in Japan too. I think so...
Thank you for this video! Was quite helpful!
Just bought one for 130 Euro for my D600
Reinhold Sobotta hope you enjoy it.
thank you