Congrats on your PXS3100! It is a wonderful instrument that is not only portable, but well-equipped with a broad range of features and sounds! Enjoy! :)
@@MerriamPianos maybe you can help me. I had a Privia PX-560 - loved it. I'm not a tech guy, and I'm an old guy, so the ease of the touch screen menu, ease to play splits/layers, was all I really needed. But when 3 keys got stuck an inch high, and could not be pushed down, I was told by the repair shop here in LI, NY that "if the key stop breaks, it's fixable; but when the retainer breaks - with Casios, not the other brands, it's all one piece. And the cost to fix that is more than buying new". They called Casios "disposables" and don't service them, told me to go with Yamaha, Korg, Roland, or Nord with next one. Any truth to this? For this reason alone I lean toward Roland. I am in need of a new keyboard and have no idea where to begin - so I appreciate your video. Thx
What is he playing? I can never find this music when I’m specifically looking for it. I watch UA-cam videos of hours of jazz that never hits the spot like what he is playing does.
The FP30X was/is such a great deal. High end PHA-4 action found on much more expensive Roland pianos with ''that Roland sound''. The speakers are not the best, but sufficient enough and when using the headphones you do get the full Roland sound quality right into your ears. The FP10X would be even better deal.
The Roland FP30X is wonderful musical offering with incredible value! It will be interesting to see if an FP10X makes its way onto the scene. I suppose we shall see! ;)
Absolutely outstanding comparison. It can hardly be done better. After this comparison there are enough arguments for anyone to prefer one of those great pianos. For me it was love on first playing when I had the opportunity to try out the px3100 in a store. Great piano. I didn't regret buying it.
Congrats on your PXS3100! It is a fantastic, fully-loaded piano! I know you will be thrilled with what it offers musically. Thanks so much for the kind words! :)
Thanks for your reviews (and performing!). They have been very valuable to me in learning about these models. There is no store in my area where I can try out keyboards personally. They keyboard action is one of the most important features. I purchased a Kawai ES110 last year and have been very pleased with it, especially the sound. One thing I'm not crazy about is how the key bounce after being released. This makes playing repeated notes a challenge, but I deal with it. When you review key action it would be great if you show key action after a key is released. Thanks!
You're very welcome! Thank you for tuning in! Congrats on your ES110. It is a fantastic instrument and am happy to hear that you're pleased with its performance! Thanks for the suggestion. We will do our best to show the key action movement, but, as you can imagine, it is something that is very difficult to capture visually. Ultimately, it is something that is felt when playing on the instrument. Thanks again and all the best! :)
I uploaded 3 videos in my channel specifically designed to show the most unexpected results regarding amplifiers, watts, and speakers: 1) Video 1: Shows a 10" subwoofer being powered by as little power as a coin battery! It also shows the subwoofer playing a fairly deep 60 Hz tone with only 0.3 watts. 2) Video 2: Shows the Yamaha PSS-F30 battery-operated toy keyboard powering the subwoofer all by itself! The PSS-F30 making a powerful bass with its tiny 1.4-watt amplifier. 3) Video 3: Shows the subwoofer being moved fairly strong with a WATCH BATTERY! It also shows the smallest Bluetooth speaker I could find on Amazon driving the large subwoofer and making it shake! Yes, the smallest Bluetooth speaker on Amazon can rock your home with bass, all by itself, with just the tiniest amplifier. My goal is to show the reality when it comes to amplifiers, bass, watts, and speakers. Digital pianos use less than 1 watt per amplifier channel when playing anything. More like 0.5 watts per channel. Even less. It is very easy to prove this claim using actual tests. Even professional loudspeaker companies like QSC, Yamaha, JBL, etc., have to use the available tricks in the audio industry to rate their amplifiers and speakers, because people make decisions on what they believe, not the truth. For example, they advertise "Peak Power" and "Program Power" in big numbers in their products, even on the specs... the continuous power is typically shown in professional products, but in parenthesis after the "wow" numbers. Example: a QSC K.12.2 is advertised to have "class-leading 2000W amplifier"... but the fuses show it can only consume 200 watts... the 2000 watts is what the amp can do in milliseconds, not real power. And this is from one of the most prestigious speaker companies... what can you expect from other companies? Regarding the FP30X vs PX-S3100: neither one has a "speaker box" in the sense of a dedicated speaker enclosure. The speakers on the FP30X are mounted on the bottom and all the sound leaks through the keys! This is an excellent design for piano tones actually. Don't believe it? Then cover your FP30X keys with a thick blanket and play a built-in song: the sound will be quiet and muted, as the separation between the keys allows sound to reach your ears - an important source of indirect sound. Same with the Casio, but the Roland has a better speaker design: larger baffle area (the whole bottom) and more volume inside the case, hence the better bass. In addition, Roland uses paper-cone drivers, which have higher sensitivity than the polypropylene/mica cones on the Casio. By the way, paper cones can be very expensive and found in audiophile speakers costing several thousand dollars. Mentioning the "Roland 11 watts vs Casio 8 watts" amplifier rated output is completely useless. Those numbers mean nothing in practice: neither piano ever produces more than 1-2 watts going to the speakers. Music is not very demanding. Amplifiers are rated based on a different type of test: - Basically, you take a purely resistive load and play a pure sine wave of a certain frequency, then quote a number. Unless the amplifier is quoted with continuous power, range of frequencies tested, and total harmonic distortion, the number means nothing. It could be cited with 10% THD, or being Program Power or Peak, or PMPO, or any of the other types of power that a manufacturer can decide to cite. - Music does not tax an amplifier much. Playing piano is a picnic for an amplifier. Even bass-heavy music can be produced with just a couple of watts. The "11 watts" or "8 watts" means this: a) Take the amplifier, feed it a 1 kHz (or some other frequency) using a pure sine wave. b) Apply a purely resistive load of a specified fixed impedance (let's say, a 4-ohm or 8-ohm load). c) Drive it to an "acceptable" distortion level. The human ear cannot detect less than 2% THD. Hope for the best from the manufacturer, as they can decide to test their amp at 10% THD. d) Give people a number of watts, preferably "Peak Power" or "Program Power" measurements, which are typically 2 times (Program), 4 times (Peak), or even more times the continuous power. Just make the number inflated, big, unrealistic, but legal. Speakers are not purely resistive loads due to the inductance generated when moving, therefore their impedance can change dramatically. The speaker box also changes the impedance. This means less current flowing from the amplifier if the impedance rises dramatically (which it does in real life when playing music). Meaning, music is not that demanding of a load, compared to a low-impedance resistive load --which is what is used to measure amps. The issue with "headroom" watts for "dynamic power" needs its own discussion, and it can be shown that it has also its deceptive side. I hope this comment puts this "amplifier/watts/speaker" issue in perspective. In the end, the best we can do is go to a piano store and test the digital piano in person. If it sounds good for you, then that's all you need to know.
I certainly concur with the final point. With that said, the science behind sound, speakers, amplifiers, wattage and power ratings is quite fascinating to the more techy musicians out there!
Stu I purchased the Roland RD88 partially based on your review of the playability, and you were dead on in your review, I REALLY enjoy playing this keyboard and enjoy the sounds as well and it makes a good controller and live keyboard for gigging. As for the FP30X, the lack of sounds and capabilities and way you access things with no real menu turned me against it. Thank you for what you do. PS, I'm a naturalized expat from Montreal. PS PS, my dad's favorite newspaper headline in Canada. Page 1, "Canadien's Win World Cup". Page 2 "World Ends"
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Congrats on your Roland RD88! They are amazing stage pianos and, if the budget allows, they are definitely worth considering for anyone that is in the market for an FP30X. Personally, I am quite saddened by Canada's loss at the World Cup today, but a first goal in the World Cup is something I never dreamed of happening in my lifetime, so it is an exciting time to say the least! :)
Thank you kindly! We appreciate you tuning in! I am not sure if I understand the question fully. Do you mean are there differences between acoustic and digital piano pedals? Generally speaking, digital piano triple pedal systems are set up and designed to mirror a grand piano pedal array, which features an una corda (soft), sostenuto and damper (sustain) pedal. Alternatively, you may be referring to the difference in feel between the Casio and Roland pedals. From my experiences, they are both excellent and provide wonderful sensitivity. :)
It is my impression that Casio is never intended for classical pianists or to learn classical repertoire. The short pivot point and the uneven weight between black and white keys are the reasons. On the other hand, the Roland action is better for classical pianists IMO. To me, the key and action resemble the ones found in Steinway & Sons pianos.
Every player will have different thoughts and feelings when it comes to the feeling of a given action. We have many classical players that use models like the PXS1100 and PXS3100 for live performance situations (weddings, corporate events, etc.). The portability can be a very appealing factor for some. We also have some players that favour the touch of the Casio instruments over the comparable Kawai and Roland models. It is all a matter of taste and subjectivity at the end of the day. :)
@@MerriamPianos Couldn't agree more. But saying from my experience, playing classical repertoire that requires significant technical skills is difficult to be performed on my Casio, although it is an older model, which is the PX-160. I couldn't imagine the difficulty playing it on keyboards with a shorter pivot point on the newer Casio model. Right now I have the Roland FP-30X and my initial impression is that it is a bit easier to play on.
I'll pass on both these models. Personaly I don't like the dynamic responce on the PHA4, and after trying a model from the CDP-S series which also has short keys I desided to stic with Kawai and Yamaha🎹🎶
Hi! Brent here! The PXS3100 is an excellent instrument, but it is a different musical proposition than the DGX670 and FP-E50, which are arranger style pianos. I would say they are in a different category. We will do our best to tackle that comparison, but we have quite a few videos in the queue currently. Thanks for the suggestion! :)
Hi Merriam music, i'm just confuse about what piano will i buy this month. If you can give me a suggestion betweet Casio privia Px s3100 or Roland FP30x, or Yamaha CK 88 *sorry for out of topic*, which one you'll choose for music gigs? thanks!
Hi! Brent here! It really depends on your musical preferences and the context of use. If you're looking for a gigging instrument, the PXS3100 is very attractive. It is super lightweight and very rich in features and onboard sounds. :)
There is a complaint that the Black Keys on the S3100 is 10 grams lighter than the white keys that is WAY TOO LIGHT , the Roland does not have such a pronounced difference of 10 grams probably almost the same as white keys? can you comment.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Some people find the key weight difference of the Casio PXS models distracting, but, personally, I find the actions quite rewarding to play, especially for certain styles of music and when using non-piano sounds. For me, it is a worthwhile trade-off for the portability and functionality of the instruments. With that said, for high-level classical playing, the PHA-4 and PHA-50 actions from Roland would be my preference. I would say that it comes down to different tools for different jobs. :)
Which piano sounds louder: the Roland FP90X with 60 watts amplifier power or the Kawai KDP75 with 18 watts? 😃I have played both in person and I would say they are approximately the same loudness in real life. But what I think it is interesting is the rationale of why. By the way, this is also similar if you replace the KDP75 with a similarly "underpowered" model. This is what happens: 1) First, the FP90X has 30 watts per channel, but 25 watts go to the 12 cm x 8 cm woofer and 5 watts to the tweeter. This means you can't just add 25 + 5 = 30 watts. You basically have 25 watts. The tweeter will be producing the high frequencies, which gives you the upper harmonics. But the meat of the sound is the 25 watt amplifier/woofer. The sensitivity of the speaker will be measured by the woofer's output at 1 kHz, which is powered by the 25 watt amplifier. So, you have 25 watts amplifier. The other 5 watts are to "embellish" the sound and give its proper sonic character, but not relevant for the calculation of volume to a reasonable degree. 2) Both the FP90X and the KDP75 have similar woofers: 12 cm x 8 cm. That doesn't mean they have the same electromechanical parameters, but let's assume that's the case, to make a calculation. 3) Let's assume the 12 cm x 8 cm speakers are identical in both instruments, and let's also assume a possible sensitivity value of 90 dB per speaker (1 watt) 4) Doubling the power increases the volume by 3 dB Then you get, per speaker channel: 1 watt = 90 dB 2 watts = 93 dB 4 watts = 96 dB 8 watts = 99 dB This is it for the Kawai KDP75 since it has only 9 watts per channel. But since there are two speakers, the volume is increased by 3 dB, so the final number is: 102 dB. That is VERY LOUD. Let's keep going: 16 watts = 102 db
The Roland FP90X doesn't get to the next level of 32 watts per channel. The 25 watts would give it about 1.5 dB more, so you get about 103.5 dB. For both speakers, you get 106.5 dB. So, you get about 4.5 dB more on the Roland, which is not a lot more. In fact, 3 dB is considered to be very little increase in volume. The thing is that you have, for the amplifier power, a geometric sequence with first term 1 and common ratio 2: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512... In other words, you get very little improvement (3 dB) with each doubling of the power, and there is no relevant difference between close numbers after the first few. For example, a 512-watt amplifier would sound almost as loud as a 256-watt amplifier (only 3 dB louder). If 1000 watts are producing, let's say, 120 dB, then 2000 watts would only get you to 123 dB. This is why speaker sensitivity and size are more relevant. The Kawai KDP75 also has a very large MDF board on the bottom (where the speakers are located, facing down). This means the speaker is also the "wall of sound" that the Kawai makes with that board, not just the tiny oval speakers. The FP90X also has its share of surface size for the speakers, which is carried out by the upper case. That also explains why the Roland FP30X is more powerful than the Casio PX-S3100. The Casio has the slimmest surface for the speakers, which limits its lower range. Their insistence in having the slimmest design has its price, sound-wise. Everything comes into play, it is not just which keyboard has the biggest amplifier. Audiophile speaker company Oswalds Mill Audio uses very large baffles on their already huge speakers to be able to project the sound. Digital piano companies put a large cardboard wall behind their pianos, and it is not just for advertisement. It also plays an acoustic role, particularly if they are going to be in the middle of the room with no wall around that helps to reinforce the sound.
So did I hear correct that the px-s3100 does not have the ability to connect to DAW software through USB? I assume it could via line out to an interface though. Secondly if you had to recommend one of these for a “family piano” with a dad who may do some recording, a mom who just wants a piano and two young kids that will need to learn, which would you recommend and why?
Hi! Brent here! The PXS3100 does have a USB to Host connection, which will allow you to connect to a DAW via USB. It does not have onboard Bluetooth MIDI so-to-speak, but it does come with Casio's WUBT10 dongle, which allows for wireless MIDI connectivity. I would personally recommend the FP30X over the PXS3100 for its versatility. It has a heavier and more authentic touch in my opinion, which will be better for your children to learn on. Furthermore, I think it is a little more versatile in terms of connectivity, which should also satisfy your recording initiatives. Thanks and hope this helps! :)
Hello! I can't decide between the Casio PX S3100 and the Roland FP 30 X. I like the sound and keyboard better in the FP30X, but it is heavy and oversized, and I like the P XS 3100 for its portability, appearance and functionality (but there are many unflattering reviews about it). I'm an aspiring pianist, and I really like experimenting with timbres. Please help me decide on an option. P.s.: sorry for my English)
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! It comes down to a matter of personal preference in the end. With that said, I usually suggest to prioritize the musical experience. Given that you prefer the sound and action of the FP30X, I would recommend going in that direction personally. :)
I think Yamaha dropped USB audio from the P-125a. And the newest Kawai ES120 does not have it either. Sorry to dash your hope that this will become the industry standard.
Things certainly seem to be going that direction. In a similar fashion, 5-pin MIDI DIN connections are also becoming a little less common these days aside from stage piano and workstation models.
The Yamaha P-125a is not an upgrade to the P-125, it rather seems to be temporarily addressing an issue with connectivity that they reported in their website for some time. In fact, the P-125a is the same instrument as the P-125, minus the audio interface. But Yamaha continues to release their new products with a built-in audio interface. The P series will likely receive an update next year, and almost certainly will have an audio interface. Recent models, such as DGX-670, YDP series, etc., have it.
Hi there! Thanks for tuning in and writing in with your question. Like the vast majority of heavier digital piano actions, there is some key noise on the FP30X's PHA4 action. With that said, how significant that noise is perceived depends on the subjectivity of the player.
I played a factory reset Roland Fp-30x recently. used my good old AKG headphones. The piano sounds were so muffled. not like all demos on youtube using the same headphones... then played a roland in shop with pha4 and another bigher model with a pha50. all sounded so muffled. Can it be tha Roland headphone preamps suck so much :/ ?
To capture our audio, we are taking direct line out feeds from the headphone jacks. Furthermore, we don't do any post-processing on the piano sounds to ensure the sounds are as transparently represented as possible. With that said, tone is a highly subjective matter of course. It is important to make sure your headphones are impedance matched as closely as possible to ensure optimal fidelity.
@@MerriamPianos Thanks for the reply. So to clarify this, in order for every review sample to be be fair you always capture sound from the headphone's plugs even when the digital piano has Main Outs connections available?
Can someone please help me? I have the yamaha dgx670 but I'm not happy. I can only play loud or soft. There's not a lot of variety in how hard or soft you press the keys. What should I buy instead if you want more variety in how loud the sound is when playing classical piano?
I think I can help. I also have a Yamaha DGX-670. I visited your channel, listened to your playing, went to my DGX-670 and imitated your pieces playing by ear. I also used a decibel meter to see how much change I could create myself: 1) Your DGX-670 sounded super bright and harsh in some videos, which suggests to me that you might have some Touch settings very high (I will describe it below) 2) It takes some practice to develop enough control over the keys to create volume changes in the piano. In some of your pieces, I was able to achieve 15 decibels difference, which is a lot. I was playing your pieces in the range of 70-85 decibels depending on how soft or hard I played. I was also able to hit slightly over 100 decibels at 75% of the volume at times. 3) I saw you in Piano Room in some of your videos: you might want to try the "Hard 2" instead of "Medium", which will soften the sound and can create more dynamic changes when played hard 4) For much more control over the dynamic, I suggest you go to "Voice Set" and modify the "Touch Sense" parameters, which are two: "Depth" and "Offset" The default values are "64", but lowering the number independently will make the DGX-670 play with more dynamic control. I would like to see if you get better results with these suggestions.
@Instrumental Covers thanks a zillion. It's 3 am right now and I feel like trying to listen to what you said to see if I can improve my settings and play with a decibel meter. At my piano lessons I play an acoustic piano and it is way superior to create good dynamics. At home I've been playing with the settings already and it created more dynamics, but then indeed it sounds too harsh. Compared to the acoustic piano I don't like the feel of the touch and regret immensely getting rid of my own acoustic piano in exchange for this 'thing' and wish I had bought some clavinova kinda digital piano. In reality I never use any of the voices or styles although I thought I would when buying it. I want to thank you so much for your help and will let you know if things improve in the morning. Much love.
@@martinepeters9891 Thank you so much for your very nice comment. I am sorry to hear you got rid of your acoustic piano, in my opinion real pianos are much more enjoyable than digital pianos. If you later wish to share your own settings in the DGX-670, I might be able to provide some assistance in suggesting some specific settings. Looking forward to hearing from you. Warm regards.
@@martinepeters9891 Hello again. In my last reply to you I forgot to mention that using the "Soft 1" and "Soft 2" settings actually makes the sound harsher because the piano becomes too sensitive to your touch. If you want to play softer, then use "Hard 2". For more control, you can use the granular setting under Touch Sense Depth and Offset, as I mentioned before. The DGX-670 gives you a lot of control over the sound. Best wishes.
Hi! Thanks for tuning into the video and writing in with your question! I am sorry to hear that you are not fully-satisfied with the dynamic and expressive potential of your Yamaha DGX670. As Instrument Covers kindly laid out, it could be a matter of making some setting tweaks that would align better with what you're looking to get out of the instrument. Alternatively, there are of course a number of other options on the market, many of which are regarded by most players as providing superior responsiveness and musicality. It all comes down to price point as the quality of the action, piano sounds and speaker fidelity increases with the budget. In terms of portable digital controllers/pianos, the Kawai VPC1 and MP11SE both have wonderful 88 wooden key actions that many people find provide immense dynamic and expressive control. The Roland FP90X is another option worth exploring. With that said, it all comes down to the budget though. Thanks and hope this helps! :)
Ciao Stu, questi confronti sono molto interessanti così sono andato in negozio e li ho confrontati side by side. Queste sono le mie impressioni. Roland fp 30x: -------- Ha una dinamica impressionante che batte qualsiasi pianoforte anche di fascia più alta, davvero stupefacente! i pianissimi e i fortissimi vengono riprodotti in maniera eccellente. 5 stelle! . La tastiera è di ottimo livello in fatto di pesatura e suonabilità. Il pianoforte va però amplificato con monitors e impianto PA per poter sentire meglio le frequenze basse. Casio px s3100-------- suona davvero bene per le mie orecchie e forse anche un tantino meglio del fratello minore px s1100 (ma devo ripetere il confronto perchè mi ero concentrato sul suono del FP 30x) lo trovo equilibrato dal punto di vista tonale nell' intero spettro. La tastiera è rapida e suonabilissima, come per il Roland se vuoi i bassi devi collegarlo ad un impianto PA e monitors per ottenere il meglio. Questo comunque accade per qualsiasi pianoforte digitale portatile dove lo spazio per alloggiare gli speakers è limitato. Il confronto è avvenuta usando una cuffia dalla risposta piatta da 14 hz fino a 500 hz con un calo di due db intorno ai 550hz. La scelta fra questi due pianoforti è davvero difficile! un saluto dall'Italia.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for sharing your insights and findings! I definitely agree that it is a very tough choice between these two powerhouse portable digital pianos. The Roland FP30X is definitely a tough competitor with its amazing combination of tone via the SuperNATURAL Piano engine and touch via the PHA4 action. With that said, the PXS3100 has an excellent tone and, for those that prefer a lighter action, a very rewarding playing experience. From my own experimentation, I have found both the FP30X and PXS3100 to really shine when being connected to a high-quality keyboard amp. The extra warmth and power that is brought to the low end presents the samples in a really impressive way. Thanks again and happy playing! :)
I'm becoming quite knowledgeable in the matter of keyboards, can tell what to expect from Roland action and Casio portability, the only thing that can surprise me now is what Stu will arrange / improvise :-) --- Hi Stu & Crew. Acoustically this is the best spot and console in the background gives the feeling that i'm participating in some remote studio session (that serves me as a material for editing practice) ua-cam.com/video/8QrfQcUSoAI/v-deo.html Red & Blue effect lights on the speakers seems so obvious, so fitting :-) That's the playground for experiments. Soft boxes on Stu's face, and some play in the background. --- Now some grumbling. Meticulously centered frame, perfectly symmetrical, fueled by a little and well controlled obsession is the staple of the great cinema. If you watch carefully Mad Max Fury Road you will notice that every cut shows the action in the center of the screen, you never need to look for the most important piece of the frame. Wes Anderson prays to the gods of symmetry (watch The Grand Budapest Hotel) It is something, that when it's there, you don't see it, it's just right. If it's not there, often you can't tell what is wrong, but subconsciously it bothers you (it bothers me :-) Greatness lays in the last, most difficult 1% In the camera preview settings, there should be a "crosshair" in the center of the screen. Roland is slightly too high, Casio is to low, try to split screen in half with the bottom edge of the instrument, and try not to cut left or right side of the instrument. The same apply to the main frame, speakers on both sides should be visible symmetrically (cut from the frame identically). I know that it takes time, but details are of the great importance, especially if you want to present your work to the tens of thousands of viewers. If you want hundreds of thousands to watch your work work and applause, you need to be called Perfection ;-)
Even if Casio pxs 3100 has another price range much higher than Roland fp30x one, this last has a better acoustic piano voices, expecially the 1!!! For me Roland is winner in this comparison!!! 👍👍👏👏👏👏🥇🥇🥇🥇🥇🥇
Every player will have their personal preference. With that said, the Roland FP30X is a great blend of touch, tone, and speaker quality, so it is hard to argue against the notion that is a fantastic digital piano option for any player. :)
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! I'm not sure which piano you are referring to? The PXS3100 or the FP30X? The PXS pianos have shorter keys/pivot lengths compared to other actions. I'm guessing that might be what you're referring to. :)
@@MerriamPianos hy there , the pxs3100 , the casio ... they said the thumb kept getting stuck when playing .. just wandering if that is a posibility...
Hello Stu! Congrats for anotar gratuitamente and helpfull video!! Can it be possibilidade tô study classical piano on px s3100, for a beginer? Thank you! 😊
Any shiny black finish (including the ebony polish finishes featured on most acoustic pianos) will be more prone to showing fingerprints of course. For me, it not a big deal as it is a purely aesthetic consideration. Plus, finger prints are easy to wipe off. :)
![FE!N BEATBOX SPEEDRUN [WR + TUTORIAL]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_WGwcDAP4KI/mqdefault.jpg)
I have the PXS3100 and absolutely adore it! Has everything, does everything, sounds great
Congrats on your PXS3100! It is a wonderful instrument that is not only portable, but well-equipped with a broad range of features and sounds! Enjoy! :)
@@MerriamPianos maybe you can help me. I had a Privia PX-560 - loved it. I'm not a tech guy, and I'm an old guy, so the ease of the touch screen menu, ease to play splits/layers, was all I really needed. But when 3 keys got stuck an inch high, and could not be pushed down, I was told by the repair shop here in LI, NY that "if the key stop breaks, it's fixable; but when the retainer breaks - with Casios, not the other brands, it's all one piece. And the cost to fix that is more than buying new". They called Casios "disposables" and don't service them, told me to go with Yamaha, Korg, Roland, or Nord with next one. Any truth to this? For this reason alone I lean toward Roland. I am in need of a new keyboard and have no idea where to begin - so I appreciate your video. Thx
How are speakers ?
Can you use it as a midi controller with other keyboard?
I’m at the point that I don’t really care about the comparison, I just like to hear Stu play!
Haha you're not the first to say that! ;)
Stu is an amazing player and we are very fortunate to have his immense talent!
What is he playing? I can never find this music when I’m specifically looking for it. I watch UA-cam videos of hours of jazz that never hits the spot like what he is playing does.
@@branriv8417 Very true, he plays what I think of as a modern type of jazz. Always tasteful and melodic. 🤔
He has such a beautiful style .No doubt he could play any style .
How much do you pay him 🤔@@MerriamPianos
Excellent Stu, as per usual. Fun playing and mad skillz. Got me smiling when you went to town on the pianos on the Casio. :)
Thanks so much for tuning in! We're really happy to hear that you enjoyed the video! :)
The FP30X was/is such a great deal. High end PHA-4 action found on much more expensive Roland pianos with ''that Roland sound''. The speakers are not the best, but sufficient enough and when using the headphones you do get the full Roland sound quality right into your ears. The FP10X would be even better deal.
The Roland FP30X is wonderful musical offering with incredible value! It will be interesting to see if an FP10X makes its way onto the scene. I suppose we shall see! ;)
31:23 is when I knew that the roland is the one I wanted ! thanks
That's awesome! The FP30X is a killer instrument! You'll be very happy with it. :)
Absolutely outstanding comparison. It can hardly be done better. After this comparison there are enough arguments for anyone to prefer one of those great pianos. For me it was love on first playing when I had the opportunity to try out the px3100 in a store. Great piano. I didn't regret buying it.
Congrats on your PXS3100! It is a fantastic, fully-loaded piano! I know you will be thrilled with what it offers musically. Thanks so much for the kind words! :)
Thank you for your beautiful work on helping us.
Thank you so much for tuning in! We're glad you have been enjoying the video reviews/comparisons. :)
Thanks for your reviews (and performing!). They have been very valuable to me in learning about these models. There is no store in my area where I can try out keyboards personally. They keyboard action is one of the most important features. I purchased a Kawai ES110 last year and have been very pleased with it, especially the sound. One thing I'm not crazy about is how the key bounce after being released. This makes playing repeated notes a challenge, but I deal with it. When you review key action it would be great if you show key action after a key is released. Thanks!
You're very welcome! Thank you for tuning in! Congrats on your ES110. It is a fantastic instrument and am happy to hear that you're pleased with its performance! Thanks for the suggestion. We will do our best to show the key action movement, but, as you can imagine, it is something that is very difficult to capture visually. Ultimately, it is something that is felt when playing on the instrument. Thanks again and all the best! :)
USB AUDIOs main use is to allow you to play iPad or iPhone external sounds ie the Vb3 organ on iOS is cheap and amazing.
I believe you are referring to USB MIDI. :)
USB MIDI allows you to transmit MIDI data to access other sound libraries and VST plug ins.
Great comparison. Thank you!
You're welcome! Thanks for tuning in! :)
I just love your playing and concept. Very cool. You're a musical monster!
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for watching! I'll be happy to pass on your kind words to Stu. :)
I'm sure this video will help lots of people 🙂Great job guys!
Thank you kindly! We sincerely appreciate that. :)
@Merriam Music that's great! I'll wate for the reviews🎹🎶
Sounds good! Thanks for tuning in! :)
Good Lord... This man is a monster pianist. Thank you for the info. Greetings from Mexico ❤.
Thanks for tuning in! I'll be happy to pass along your kind words to Stu! :)
Dude. You are such an amazing player! 😎❤🎹
Thanks for tuning in! I'll be happy to send along your kind words to Stu! :)
Thanks this was an excellent comparison. Definitely some things for me to re-think.
You're very welcome! We're happy to hear that you found the video helpful and compelling. :)
I uploaded 3 videos in my channel specifically designed to show the most unexpected results regarding amplifiers, watts, and speakers:
1) Video 1: Shows a 10" subwoofer being powered by as little power as a coin battery! It also shows the subwoofer playing a fairly deep 60 Hz tone with only 0.3 watts.
2) Video 2: Shows the Yamaha PSS-F30 battery-operated toy keyboard powering the subwoofer all by itself! The PSS-F30 making a powerful bass with its tiny 1.4-watt amplifier.
3) Video 3: Shows the subwoofer being moved fairly strong with a WATCH BATTERY! It also shows the smallest Bluetooth speaker I could find on Amazon driving the large subwoofer and making it shake! Yes, the smallest Bluetooth speaker on Amazon can rock your home with bass, all by itself, with just the tiniest amplifier.
My goal is to show the reality when it comes to amplifiers, bass, watts, and speakers.
Digital pianos use less than 1 watt per amplifier channel when playing anything. More like 0.5 watts per channel. Even less. It is very easy to prove this claim using actual tests.
Even professional loudspeaker companies like QSC, Yamaha, JBL, etc., have to use the available tricks in the audio industry to rate their amplifiers and speakers, because people make decisions on what they believe, not the truth. For example, they advertise "Peak Power" and "Program Power" in big numbers in their products, even on the specs... the continuous power is typically shown in professional products, but in parenthesis after the "wow" numbers. Example: a QSC K.12.2 is advertised to have "class-leading 2000W amplifier"... but the fuses show it can only consume 200 watts... the 2000 watts is what the amp can do in milliseconds, not real power. And this is from one of the most prestigious speaker companies... what can you expect from other companies?
Regarding the FP30X vs PX-S3100: neither one has a "speaker box" in the sense of a dedicated speaker enclosure. The speakers on the FP30X are mounted on the bottom and all the sound leaks through the keys! This is an excellent design for piano tones actually. Don't believe it? Then cover your FP30X keys with a thick blanket and play a built-in song: the sound will be quiet and muted, as the separation between the keys allows sound to reach your ears - an important source of indirect sound. Same with the Casio, but the Roland has a better speaker design: larger baffle area (the whole bottom) and more volume inside the case, hence the better bass. In addition, Roland uses paper-cone drivers, which have higher sensitivity than the polypropylene/mica cones on the Casio. By the way, paper cones can be very expensive and found in audiophile speakers costing several thousand dollars.
Mentioning the "Roland 11 watts vs Casio 8 watts" amplifier rated output is completely useless. Those numbers mean nothing in practice: neither piano ever produces more than 1-2 watts going to the speakers. Music is not very demanding. Amplifiers are rated based on a different type of test:
- Basically, you take a purely resistive load and play a pure sine wave of a certain frequency, then quote a number. Unless the amplifier is quoted with continuous power, range of frequencies tested, and total harmonic distortion, the number means nothing. It could be cited with 10% THD, or being Program Power or Peak, or PMPO, or any of the other types of power that a manufacturer can decide to cite.
- Music does not tax an amplifier much. Playing piano is a picnic for an amplifier. Even bass-heavy music can be produced with just a couple of watts.
The "11 watts" or "8 watts" means this:
a) Take the amplifier, feed it a 1 kHz (or some other frequency) using a pure sine wave.
b) Apply a purely resistive load of a specified fixed impedance (let's say, a 4-ohm or 8-ohm load).
c) Drive it to an "acceptable" distortion level. The human ear cannot detect less than 2% THD. Hope for the best from the manufacturer, as they can decide to test their amp at 10% THD.
d) Give people a number of watts, preferably "Peak Power" or "Program Power" measurements, which are typically 2 times (Program), 4 times (Peak), or even more times the continuous power. Just make the number inflated, big, unrealistic, but legal.
Speakers are not purely resistive loads due to the inductance generated when moving, therefore their impedance can change dramatically. The speaker box also changes the impedance. This means less current flowing from the amplifier if the impedance rises dramatically (which it does in real life when playing music). Meaning, music is not that demanding of a load, compared to a low-impedance resistive load --which is what is used to measure amps.
The issue with "headroom" watts for "dynamic power" needs its own discussion, and it can be shown that it has also its deceptive side.
I hope this comment puts this "amplifier/watts/speaker" issue in perspective.
In the end, the best we can do is go to a piano store and test the digital piano in person. If it sounds good for you, then that's all you need to know.
Wow, such an extensive post! Kudos mate!
@@unotoli Thanks! :)
I certainly concur with the final point. With that said, the science behind sound, speakers, amplifiers, wattage and power ratings is quite fascinating to the more techy musicians out there!
Stu I purchased the Roland RD88 partially based on your review of the playability, and you were dead on in your review, I REALLY enjoy playing this keyboard and enjoy the sounds as well and it makes a good controller and live keyboard for gigging. As for the FP30X, the lack of sounds and capabilities and way you access things with no real menu turned me against it. Thank you for what you do. PS, I'm a naturalized expat from Montreal. PS PS, my dad's favorite newspaper headline in Canada. Page 1, "Canadien's Win World Cup". Page 2 "World Ends"
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Congrats on your Roland RD88! They are amazing stage pianos and, if the budget allows, they are definitely worth considering for anyone that is in the market for an FP30X. Personally, I am quite saddened by Canada's loss at the World Cup today, but a first goal in the World Cup is something I never dreamed of happening in my lifetime, so it is an exciting time to say the least! :)
Love the overhead view! 😀
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it!
Exelent video. Thanks a lot!!
Just one question important for acoustic players. Is there any difference between the pedals?
Thank you kindly! We appreciate you tuning in! I am not sure if I understand the question fully. Do you mean are there differences between acoustic and digital piano pedals? Generally speaking, digital piano triple pedal systems are set up and designed to mirror a grand piano pedal array, which features an una corda (soft), sostenuto and damper (sustain) pedal.
Alternatively, you may be referring to the difference in feel between the Casio and Roland pedals. From my experiences, they are both excellent and provide wonderful sensitivity. :)
I think Roland fp60x vs Px-s6000 could be a great video comparison.
Thank you kindly for the suggestion! We just received our first shipment of PXS6000s, so that may very well be in the cards. ;)
Very helpful
We're so glad you found the video comparison helpful! :)
It is my impression that Casio is never intended for classical pianists or to learn classical repertoire. The short pivot point and the uneven weight between black and white keys are the reasons. On the other hand, the Roland action is better for classical pianists IMO. To me, the key and action resemble the ones found in Steinway & Sons pianos.
Every player will have different thoughts and feelings when it comes to the feeling of a given action. We have many classical players that use models like the PXS1100 and PXS3100 for live performance situations (weddings, corporate events, etc.). The portability can be a very appealing factor for some. We also have some players that favour the touch of the Casio instruments over the comparable Kawai and Roland models. It is all a matter of taste and subjectivity at the end of the day. :)
@@MerriamPianos Couldn't agree more. But saying from my experience, playing classical repertoire that requires significant technical skills is difficult to be performed on my Casio, although it is an older model, which is the PX-160. I couldn't imagine the difficulty playing it on keyboards with a shorter pivot point on the newer Casio model. Right now I have the Roland FP-30X and my initial impression is that it is a bit easier to play on.
I'll pass on both these models. Personaly I don't like the dynamic responce on the PHA4, and after trying a model from the CDP-S series which also has short keys I desided to stic with Kawai and Yamaha🎹🎶
Great! @@MerriamPianos
Great Review as ever :)
Thanks so much! We appreciate you tuning in! :)
Is the Casio px-s3100 in the League as the Yamaha DGX 670 and Roland FP - E 50 ?if so, can you do a review on all three of them. Thanks
Hi! Brent here! The PXS3100 is an excellent instrument, but it is a different musical proposition than the DGX670 and FP-E50, which are arranger style pianos. I would say they are in a different category. We will do our best to tackle that comparison, but we have quite a few videos in the queue currently. Thanks for the suggestion! :)
Hi Merriam music, i'm just confuse about what piano will i buy this month. If you can give me a suggestion betweet Casio privia Px s3100 or Roland FP30x, or Yamaha CK 88 *sorry for out of topic*, which one you'll choose for music gigs? thanks!
Hi! Brent here! It really depends on your musical preferences and the context of use. If you're looking for a gigging instrument, the PXS3100 is very attractive. It is super lightweight and very rich in features and onboard sounds. :)
There is a complaint that the Black Keys on the S3100 is 10 grams lighter than the white keys that is WAY TOO LIGHT , the Roland does not have such a pronounced difference of 10 grams probably almost the same as white keys?
can you comment.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Some people find the key weight difference of the Casio PXS models distracting, but, personally, I find the actions quite rewarding to play, especially for certain styles of music and when using non-piano sounds. For me, it is a worthwhile trade-off for the portability and functionality of the instruments. With that said, for high-level classical playing, the PHA-4 and PHA-50 actions from Roland would be my preference. I would say that it comes down to different tools for different jobs. :)
Which piano sounds louder: the Roland FP90X with 60 watts amplifier power or the Kawai KDP75 with 18 watts? 😃I have played both in person and I would say they are approximately the same loudness in real life. But what I think it is interesting is the rationale of why. By the way, this is also similar if you replace the KDP75 with a similarly "underpowered" model. This is what happens:
1) First, the FP90X has 30 watts per channel, but 25 watts go to the 12 cm x 8 cm woofer and 5 watts to the tweeter. This means you can't just add 25 + 5 = 30 watts. You basically have 25 watts. The tweeter will be producing the high frequencies, which gives you the upper harmonics. But the meat of the sound is the 25 watt amplifier/woofer. The sensitivity of the speaker will be measured by the woofer's output at 1 kHz, which is powered by the 25 watt amplifier. So, you have 25 watts amplifier. The other 5 watts are to "embellish" the sound and give its proper sonic character, but not relevant for the calculation of volume to a reasonable degree.
2) Both the FP90X and the KDP75 have similar woofers: 12 cm x 8 cm. That doesn't mean they have the same electromechanical parameters, but let's assume that's the case, to make a calculation.
3) Let's assume the 12 cm x 8 cm speakers are identical in both instruments, and let's also assume a possible sensitivity value of 90 dB per speaker (1 watt)
4) Doubling the power increases the volume by 3 dB
Then you get, per speaker channel:
1 watt = 90 dB
2 watts = 93 dB
4 watts = 96 dB
8 watts = 99 dB
This is it for the Kawai KDP75 since it has only 9 watts per channel. But since there are two speakers, the volume is increased by 3 dB, so the final number is: 102 dB. That is VERY LOUD.
Let's keep going:
16 watts = 102 db
The Roland FP90X doesn't get to the next level of 32 watts per channel. The 25 watts would give it about 1.5 dB more, so you get about 103.5 dB. For both speakers, you get 106.5 dB.
So, you get about 4.5 dB more on the Roland, which is not a lot more. In fact, 3 dB is considered to be very little increase in volume.
The thing is that you have, for the amplifier power, a geometric sequence with first term 1 and common ratio 2:
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512...
In other words, you get very little improvement (3 dB) with each doubling of the power, and there is no relevant difference between close numbers after the first few.
For example, a 512-watt amplifier would sound almost as loud as a 256-watt amplifier (only 3 dB louder).
If 1000 watts are producing, let's say, 120 dB, then 2000 watts would only get you to 123 dB.
This is why speaker sensitivity and size are more relevant.
The Kawai KDP75 also has a very large MDF board on the bottom (where the speakers are located, facing down). This means the speaker is also the "wall of sound" that the Kawai makes with that board, not just the tiny oval speakers. The FP90X also has its share of surface size for the speakers, which is carried out by the upper case.
That also explains why the Roland FP30X is more powerful than the Casio PX-S3100. The Casio has the slimmest surface for the speakers, which limits its lower range. Their insistence in having the slimmest design has its price, sound-wise. Everything comes into play, it is not just which keyboard has the biggest amplifier.
Audiophile speaker company Oswalds Mill Audio uses very large baffles on their already huge speakers to be able to project the sound.
Digital piano companies put a large cardboard wall behind their pianos, and it is not just for advertisement. It also plays an acoustic role, particularly if they are going to be in the middle of the room with no wall around that helps to reinforce the sound.
Thanks for sharing! For those seeking a thorough lesson in amplification, speaker volume, and acoustics, please see above. ^ ^ ^ :)
@@MerriamPianos Ha ha! Thanks a lot Brent 😄
So did I hear correct that the px-s3100 does not have the ability to connect to DAW software through USB? I assume it could via line out to an interface though.
Secondly if you had to recommend one of these for a “family piano” with a dad who may do some recording, a mom who just wants a piano and two young kids that will need to learn, which would you recommend and why?
Hi! Brent here! The PXS3100 does have a USB to Host connection, which will allow you to connect to a DAW via USB. It does not have onboard Bluetooth MIDI so-to-speak, but it does come with Casio's WUBT10 dongle, which allows for wireless MIDI connectivity.
I would personally recommend the FP30X over the PXS3100 for its versatility. It has a heavier and more authentic touch in my opinion, which will be better for your children to learn on. Furthermore, I think it is a little more versatile in terms of connectivity, which should also satisfy your recording initiatives. Thanks and hope this helps! :)
Excellent pianiste !
Stu is a fantastic player and we are lucky to have him! :)
Hello! I can't decide between the Casio PX S3100 and the Roland FP 30 X. I like the sound and keyboard better in the FP30X, but it is heavy and oversized, and I like the P XS 3100 for its portability, appearance and functionality (but there are many unflattering reviews about it). I'm an aspiring pianist, and I really like experimenting with timbres. Please help me decide on an option.
P.s.: sorry for my English)
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! It comes down to a matter of personal preference in the end. With that said, I usually suggest to prioritize the musical experience. Given that you prefer the sound and action of the FP30X, I would recommend going in that direction personally. :)
@@MerriamPianos Thanks, Brent!)
I am hoping the PX-S3100 will drop price for the Christmas. All the other competing models have lowered prices but not the PX-S3100 😑
I suppose only time will tell! We have not received any information from Casio yet regarding Canadian holiday sales campaigns.
@@MerriamPianos 😂 I am replying from Singapore.
Earthquake at 25:38? 😄
Thankfully, it was only a 2.5 magnitude quake!
I think Yamaha dropped USB audio from the P-125a. And the newest Kawai ES120 does not have it either. Sorry to dash your hope that this will become the industry standard.
Things certainly seem to be going that direction. In a similar fashion, 5-pin MIDI DIN connections are also becoming a little less common these days aside from stage piano and workstation models.
The Yamaha P-125a is not an upgrade to the P-125, it rather seems to be temporarily addressing an issue with connectivity that they reported in their website for some time. In fact, the P-125a is the same instrument as the P-125, minus the audio interface. But Yamaha continues to release their new products with a built-in audio interface. The P series will likely receive an update next year, and almost certainly will have an audio interface. Recent models, such as DGX-670, YDP series, etc., have it.
Is it true that the FP-30X has clunky keys sounds when you press them when the piano is turned off? Is it a noisy keyboard?
Hi there! Thanks for tuning in and writing in with your question. Like the vast majority of heavier digital piano actions, there is some key noise on the FP30X's PHA4 action. With that said, how significant that noise is perceived depends on the subjectivity of the player.
@@MerriamPianos Thanks for the answer! Could you recommend me a digital piano in the same budget with silent keys?
I played a factory reset Roland Fp-30x recently. used my good old AKG headphones. The piano sounds were so muffled. not like all demos on youtube using the same headphones... then played a roland in shop with pha4 and another bigher model with a pha50. all sounded so muffled. Can it be tha Roland headphone preamps suck so much :/ ?
To capture our audio, we are taking direct line out feeds from the headphone jacks. Furthermore, we don't do any post-processing on the piano sounds to ensure the sounds are as transparently represented as possible. With that said, tone is a highly subjective matter of course. It is important to make sure your headphones are impedance matched as closely as possible to ensure optimal fidelity.
@@MerriamPianos Thanks for the reply. So to clarify this, in order for every review sample to be be fair you always capture sound from the headphone's plugs even when the digital piano has Main Outs connections available?
Was hoping for an ES120 review haha! They must be really hard to get a hold of right now🎹🎶
That's what I thought too!🎵🎵
We just received our first shipment of ES120 pianos. Sit tight as reviews and comparisons will be coming your way soon! ;)
@@Instrumental-Covers hahaha🎹🎶
What External speakers are used?
We did not use external speakers to capture the audio here. We use line out signals directly from the pianos unless otherwise stated.
Thanks for the review from Ukraine
Thank you so much for watching! We appreciate it. :)
Thq bro 💗💢👍
You're welcome! :)
Can someone please help me? I have the yamaha dgx670 but I'm not happy. I can only play loud or soft. There's not a lot of variety in how hard or soft you press the keys. What should I buy instead if you want more variety in how loud the sound is when playing classical piano?
I think I can help. I also have a Yamaha DGX-670. I visited your channel, listened to your playing, went to my DGX-670 and imitated your pieces playing by ear. I also used a decibel meter to see how much change I could create myself:
1) Your DGX-670 sounded super bright and harsh in some videos, which suggests to me that you might have some Touch settings very high (I will describe it below)
2) It takes some practice to develop enough control over the keys to create volume changes in the piano. In some of your pieces, I was able to achieve 15 decibels difference, which is a lot. I was playing your pieces in the range of 70-85 decibels depending on how soft or hard I played. I was also able to hit slightly over 100 decibels at 75% of the volume at times.
3) I saw you in Piano Room in some of your videos: you might want to try the "Hard 2" instead of "Medium", which will soften the sound and can create more dynamic changes when played hard
4) For much more control over the dynamic, I suggest you go to "Voice Set" and modify the "Touch Sense" parameters, which are two: "Depth" and "Offset"
The default values are "64", but lowering the number independently will make the DGX-670 play with more dynamic control.
I would like to see if you get better results with these suggestions.
@Instrumental Covers thanks a zillion. It's 3 am right now and I feel like trying to listen to what you said to see if I can improve my settings and play with a decibel meter. At my piano lessons I play an acoustic piano and it is way superior to create good dynamics. At home I've been playing with the settings already and it created more dynamics, but then indeed it sounds too harsh. Compared to the acoustic piano I don't like the feel of the touch and regret immensely getting rid of my own acoustic piano in exchange for this 'thing' and wish I had bought some clavinova kinda digital piano. In reality I never use any of the voices or styles although I thought I would when buying it.
I want to thank you so much for your help and will let you know if things improve in the morning. Much love.
@@martinepeters9891 Thank you so much for your very nice comment. I am sorry to hear you got rid of your acoustic piano, in my opinion real pianos are much more enjoyable than digital pianos. If you later wish to share your own settings in the DGX-670, I might be able to provide some assistance in suggesting some specific settings. Looking forward to hearing from you. Warm regards.
@@martinepeters9891 Hello again. In my last reply to you I forgot to mention that using the "Soft 1" and "Soft 2" settings actually makes the sound harsher because the piano becomes too sensitive to your touch. If you want to play softer, then use "Hard 2". For more control, you can use the granular setting under Touch Sense Depth and Offset, as I mentioned before. The DGX-670 gives you a lot of control over the sound. Best wishes.
Hi! Thanks for tuning into the video and writing in with your question! I am sorry to hear that you are not fully-satisfied with the dynamic and expressive potential of your Yamaha DGX670. As Instrument Covers kindly laid out, it could be a matter of making some setting tweaks that would align better with what you're looking to get out of the instrument.
Alternatively, there are of course a number of other options on the market, many of which are regarded by most players as providing superior responsiveness and musicality. It all comes down to price point as the quality of the action, piano sounds and speaker fidelity increases with the budget. In terms of portable digital controllers/pianos, the Kawai VPC1 and MP11SE both have wonderful 88 wooden key actions that many people find provide immense dynamic and expressive control. The Roland FP90X is another option worth exploring. With that said, it all comes down to the budget though. Thanks and hope this helps! :)
So what the keys is better of roland or casio?
It really comes down to what your preferences are. The FP30X has a heavier touch, whereas the PXS3100 has a much lighter touch overall.
@@MerriamPianos I had earlier Casio CDP S-100, They both have similar keys? Or Privia have better and heavier keys?
Supr info 💗💢👍
Many thanks! We appreciate that! :)
Does the Casio 3100 have any rotary effects for organ ? Like similar to a Leslie amp
Yup! The PXS3100 does have a rotary effect. Even better yet, you can actually adjust the rate of the effect. :)
Ciao Stu, questi confronti sono molto interessanti così sono andato in negozio e li ho confrontati side by side. Queste sono le mie impressioni. Roland fp 30x: -------- Ha una dinamica impressionante che batte qualsiasi pianoforte anche di fascia più alta, davvero stupefacente! i pianissimi e i fortissimi vengono riprodotti in maniera eccellente. 5 stelle! . La tastiera è di ottimo livello in fatto di pesatura e suonabilità. Il pianoforte va però amplificato con monitors e impianto PA per poter sentire meglio le frequenze basse. Casio px s3100-------- suona davvero bene per le mie orecchie e forse anche un tantino meglio del fratello minore px s1100 (ma devo ripetere il confronto perchè mi ero concentrato sul suono del FP 30x) lo trovo equilibrato dal punto di vista tonale nell' intero spettro. La tastiera è rapida e suonabilissima, come per il Roland se vuoi i bassi devi collegarlo ad un impianto PA e monitors per ottenere il meglio. Questo comunque accade per qualsiasi pianoforte digitale portatile dove lo spazio per alloggiare gli speakers è limitato. Il confronto è avvenuta usando una cuffia dalla risposta piatta da 14 hz fino a 500 hz con un calo di due db intorno ai 550hz. La scelta fra questi due pianoforti è davvero difficile! un saluto dall'Italia.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for sharing your insights and findings! I definitely agree that it is a very tough choice between these two powerhouse portable digital pianos. The Roland FP30X is definitely a tough competitor with its amazing combination of tone via the SuperNATURAL Piano engine and touch via the PHA4 action. With that said, the PXS3100 has an excellent tone and, for those that prefer a lighter action, a very rewarding playing experience. From my own experimentation, I have found both the FP30X and PXS3100 to really shine when being connected to a high-quality keyboard amp. The extra warmth and power that is brought to the low end presents the samples in a really impressive way. Thanks again and happy playing! :)
CDPS360 vs XE20?
Thanks so much for the suggestion! We will do our best to tackle that comparison for you. :)
I dont know what you use to compress sound but it sounds terrible...please do raw test
Are you watching the video at the highest available quality?
I'm becoming quite knowledgeable in the matter of keyboards, can tell what to expect from Roland action and Casio portability,
the only thing that can surprise me now is what Stu will arrange / improvise :-)
---
Hi Stu & Crew.
Acoustically this is the best spot and console in the background gives the feeling that i'm participating in some remote studio session (that serves me as a material for editing practice) ua-cam.com/video/8QrfQcUSoAI/v-deo.html
Red & Blue effect lights on the speakers seems so obvious, so fitting :-)
That's the playground for experiments. Soft boxes on Stu's face, and some play in the background.
---
Now some grumbling.
Meticulously centered frame, perfectly symmetrical, fueled by a little and well controlled obsession is the staple of the great cinema.
If you watch carefully Mad Max Fury Road you will notice that every cut shows the action in the center of the screen, you never need to look for the most important piece of the frame. Wes Anderson prays to the gods of symmetry (watch The Grand Budapest Hotel)
It is something, that when it's there, you don't see it, it's just right. If it's not there, often you can't tell what is wrong, but subconsciously it bothers you (it bothers me :-) Greatness lays in the last, most difficult 1%
In the camera preview settings, there should be a "crosshair" in the center of the screen. Roland is slightly too high, Casio is to low, try to split screen in half with the bottom edge of the instrument, and try not to cut left or right side of the instrument.
The same apply to the main frame, speakers on both sides should be visible symmetrically (cut from the frame identically).
I know that it takes time, but details are of the great importance, especially if you want to present your work to the tens of thousands of viewers. If you want hundreds of thousands to watch your work work and applause, you need to be called Perfection ;-)
Stu always does a great job at keeping the musical demonstrations fresh with his playing and arrangements! Thanks for taking the time to tune in!
Even if Casio pxs 3100 has another price range much higher than Roland fp30x one, this last has a better acoustic piano voices, expecially the 1!!! For me Roland is winner in this comparison!!! 👍👍👏👏👏👏🥇🥇🥇🥇🥇🥇
Every player will have their personal preference. With that said, the Roland FP30X is a great blend of touch, tone, and speaker quality, so it is hard to argue against the notion that is a fantastic digital piano option for any player. :)
@@MerriamPianos Thank you for your answer, Stud!
someone said that the keys might be thinner ... either that ... or stickier...
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! I'm not sure which piano you are referring to? The PXS3100 or the FP30X? The PXS pianos have shorter keys/pivot lengths compared to other actions. I'm guessing that might be what you're referring to. :)
@@MerriamPianos hy there , the pxs3100 , the casio ... they said the thumb kept getting stuck when playing .. just wandering if that is a posibility...
Hello Stu!
Congrats for anotar gratuitamente and helpfull video!!
Can it be possibilidade tô study classical piano on px s3100, for a beginer?
Thank you! 😊
Dolphin Dance 4:18
Thanks for tuning in! :)
Nice hair Stu
:)
The PX S3100 seems to attract fingerprints easily. What does everyone think about this?
Any shiny black finish (including the ebony polish finishes featured on most acoustic pianos) will be more prone to showing fingerprints of course. For me, it not a big deal as it is a purely aesthetic consideration. Plus, finger prints are easy to wipe off. :)
Купил Roland FP-30X. Начинаю с нуля осваивать фортепиано.
Congrats on your FP30X and beginning your piano journey! :)
@@MerriamPianos,
thank you very much
Disrecpectful playing! Do it more, please🙏
I am not entirely sure what you mean by "disrespectful", but we're glad that you enjoyed Stu's comparison and demos. :)
@@MerriamPianos it's a expression tha we use in Brazil. It like a hyperbole😅 when musicians are so great! Anyway, congretulations Stu!