The 2021 Nissan Rogue Stands Out from the Crowd | MotorWeek Road Test

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 215

  • @tomdrummy4984
    @tomdrummy4984 3 роки тому +8

    Have the platinum and love the heads up display. Comfort, quiet ride, handles well, great mpg.......not worried about cvt.......bought from a dealer with lifetime warranty ( not transferable) on power train. Simple.
    No, it’s not a race car.

    • @onenikkione
      @onenikkione 3 роки тому +4

      did you read the entire warranty? those have to be followed to the "T"

  • @7g6_66
    @7g6_66 3 роки тому +14

    Love this rogue, have one in the family and it’s defiantly better than the 2017 we had... feels way better in terms of how the transmission operates

    • @digitaldoc100
      @digitaldoc100 3 роки тому +3

      How defiant can a CVT be?

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 3 роки тому +3

      @@digitaldoc100 very different. Most of the time the engine is never really heard now because the way the engine and cvt operates. The way the tq converter locks and unlocks feels different and more connected and while rolling if the tq converter is unlocked and you put your foot on the pedal the old rogue would rev to atleast 2500rpm before initiating the tq converter to start locking making the engine revs higher with higher sound but the new 1 can almost instantaneously lock at a much lower grab point of say 2k rpm. There's qlot it does different that the common person wouldn't understand especially if they don't own 1.

    • @7g6_66
      @7g6_66 3 роки тому +2

      @@occckid123 couldn’t agree more

    • @foxtrot685
      @foxtrot685 3 роки тому +1

      @@occckid123 it’s way smoother too and the d step logic programming is way more natural. Everything just feels more direct and natural with it.

  • @josephbartolome9920
    @josephbartolome9920 3 роки тому +22

    At least the CVT has been replaced by the nine-speed in the new upcoming Pathfinder. So cross fingers when the next upcoming models arrive it'll will continue without it too.

  • @emeyer6963
    @emeyer6963 3 роки тому +17

    Scotty Kilmer enters chat when the Jatco CVT is mentioned.He can be heard yelling "Money Pit"

    • @sleeksilver
      @sleeksilver 3 роки тому +6

      Scotty Kilmer is a hack.

    • @emeyer6963
      @emeyer6963 3 роки тому +1

      @@sleeksilver And a rich one

    • @rafaelg9016
      @rafaelg9016 3 роки тому +1

      He’s a hater

    • @billyshannon6454
      @billyshannon6454 3 роки тому

      @@rafaelg9016 you don't know any mechanics, do you?

    • @sleeksilver
      @sleeksilver 3 роки тому +4

      @Steve Guard Boomers and the uneducated love him.

  • @dcjohnson2490
    @dcjohnson2490 3 роки тому +2

    It's a 2021 vehicle but this still manages to look like a retro review. I love it.

  • @DeanApril14
    @DeanApril14 3 роки тому +18

    I have the same one you tested. I love it just wish it had a bit more power.

    • @scott8238
      @scott8238 3 роки тому +6

      seems to be the case in most of this segment. Co worker has a new toyota rav-4 and it's very sluggish.

    • @scott8238
      @scott8238 3 роки тому +4

      @Jonathan A I drove the Rav4 and its very disappointing. They both share the same 0-60 mph so no it's not "way" faster.

    • @rafaelg9016
      @rafaelg9016 3 роки тому

      They are going to reveal a 3 cylinder with 221 lb-ft and 201 hp

    • @automotivetv9861
      @automotivetv9861 3 роки тому +5

      Don't we all wish our cars had more power...

    • @automotivetv9861
      @automotivetv9861 3 роки тому

      @@rafaelg9016 my 05 V6 camry makes about the same power haha

  • @gabrielgonzalez9547
    @gabrielgonzalez9547 3 роки тому +14

    As soon as I heard “CVT” it was a deal-breaker for me.

    • @zionakinjide650
      @zionakinjide650 3 роки тому +1

      Is the CVT that bad?...I own an 08 rogue and the gear drives good.

    • @ajf5745
      @ajf5745 3 роки тому +2

      @@zionakinjide650 it just has too many problems. Jatco transmissions rarely hit high mileage

    • @trent7080
      @trent7080 3 роки тому +6

      @@zionakinjide650 People don't maintain their CVT then complain when they break. Most of the people commenting on the CVT have never owned a Nissan. Over 1/4 of all vehicles on the road are Nissan a good amount are high mileage.

    • @misteralvinstone
      @misteralvinstone 3 роки тому +1

      @@trent7080 as much as I agree with you, I did take care of my CVT transmission. Went DOA on me at 144,000 miles. I have heard similar stories about CVTs in other Nissan products.

    • @kickwagon
      @kickwagon 3 роки тому +2

      Just traded our 2018 Murano in with 16k miles. That CVT was trash. It was like an anchor just holding that fantastic V6 back. You’ll always have apologists for certain brands but the numbers don’t lie; Nissan’s CVT’s fail prematurely quite often. Ask the attorneys heading the numerous class action lawsuits.
      That said we have the new Rogue and the 2.5/CVT combo is far better by an inconceivable amount vs our Murano. It feels like the Rogue’s engine and trans work together to deliver power when needed where the Murano felt it was constantly battling its transmission, as if it was lugging it along because it would rather stay home.
      And all that said my 2018 Ram 1500 V8 4x4 was better than both and was going for (brand new) $7k less than the Murano and only $2k more than the Rogue. Had it not been for the financial strain I endured after the lockdown, I would have bought the Ram at the end of the lease and never needed another vehicle.

  • @scott8238
    @scott8238 3 роки тому +12

    CVT's work well on smaller cars and SUV's for gas mileage you just have to maintain them.

    • @CherrySquishee
      @CherrySquishee 3 роки тому +3

      Yep. Most people don't maintain those as needed. They ain't like maintaining a traditional slushbox. The cvt in my 08 Lancer passed 255,xxx this year. (Knock on wood)

    • @donaldwilson2620
      @donaldwilson2620 3 роки тому +1

      As a Honda technician, I can tell you that the CVT's on a majority of Honda vehicles have been proven to be very reliable. It's all about maintenance.

    • @zionakinjide650
      @zionakinjide650 3 роки тому

      @@donaldwilson2620 Maintenance like regular gear oil check and change?

    • @donaldwilson2620
      @donaldwilson2620 3 роки тому

      @@zionakinjide650 More like mileage because the Honda CVT's don't have dipsticks. Every 30K miles is usually the regular interval for changing the transmission fluid on a Honda.

  • @snakebite6511
    @snakebite6511 3 роки тому +3

    we test rode one of these late last year when my wife was looking, she had a 2017 Rogue and while it was an extremely reliable vehicle, it was basically gutless and not much changed in the way of power for 2021; however, the interior of the Platinum is quite nice. She end up going with the new Chevy Equinox Premium, she seems happy with it and it has far more get up and go than the Rogue.
    Toyota and Honda was not even in the running as they both have that plastic feel.
    I picked up a new truck a month ago and looked at the Tundra, what a hunk of Junk, so plastic inside the cabin

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 3 роки тому

      She has the 1.5? The 1.5 is slower than this rogue and gets slower as the tq is erased as the speed increases.

    • @knurlgnar24
      @knurlgnar24 3 роки тому

      I agree about the cheapness of the Toyota and Honda in terms of 'feel'. Their interiors are so 1990's in terms of assembly quality and I'm not sure how they get a pass on that.

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 3 роки тому

      @@knurlgnar24 the interior on a 90's accord is much better than the new accord. Idk what you're talking about! Old camry much better also!!!

  • @pdlynch4330
    @pdlynch4330 3 роки тому +5

    Love that quality transmission ...built to last

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 3 роки тому

      Yes it is

    • @1vw4me
      @1vw4me 3 роки тому +2

      LOL!!!!!!!!

    • @N2LADIES55
      @N2LADIES55 3 роки тому

      NO, it's not! You'll be bitching and whining when it breaks down when it reaches 50,000 miles!

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 3 роки тому +3

      @@N2LADIES55 so why do I have almost 350k on mine?

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 3 роки тому +4

      @@N2LADIES55 I believe he was being sarcastic lol.

  • @frankoh3193
    @frankoh3193 3 роки тому +8

    JATCO CVT? wow.... that needs to go!

  • @wallybeegone
    @wallybeegone 3 роки тому +14

    CVT, slow engine, heavy body, what could go wrong? 🙄

    • @jakp8777
      @jakp8777 3 роки тому

      Nissan dealers finance anyone

    • @scott8238
      @scott8238 3 роки тому +1

      This is the case in the whole cuv segment. My co worker has a new toyota rav 4 and hates it already for these reasons.

    • @rafaelg9016
      @rafaelg9016 3 роки тому +2

      This generation is lighter, the torque number is very good and the horsepower is adequate, also the newest CVTs have a better response and reliability.

    • @Chris-v4z
      @Chris-v4z 14 днів тому

      Nissan: Hold my beer, we have a 3 cylinder turbo for 2022 lol.

  • @connerchampion5656
    @connerchampion5656 3 роки тому

    The Jatco conventional automatics are reliable but there cvt models are not.

  • @billyshannon6454
    @billyshannon6454 3 роки тому

    Have they made the cvt anymore reliable? No probably not.

  • @steveespinola7652
    @steveespinola7652 3 роки тому

    If that CVT is so bad then why doesn't Nissan get rid of it?? 🤔

  • @fastdogcobra
    @fastdogcobra 3 роки тому +13

    Still has that junk Jatco CVT. My dad transports cars from auctions for dealers and he's always talking about how many Nissans that he drives with bad CVT's.

    • @fastdogcobra
      @fastdogcobra 3 роки тому +1

      @Jonathan A nope. He drives all kinds of Versas, Rogues, Altimas 2 or 3 yrs old with less than 100000 miles that the CVT's are bad

    • @sleeksilver
      @sleeksilver 3 роки тому +3

      JATCO CVTs aren't what they used to be. Reliability went wayyyy up in the new CVT8s that have been installed in vehicles 2016-2017 and newer.

    • @Mabeylater293
      @Mabeylater293 3 роки тому +1

      @Jonathan A they all have been breaking down. The “all new” mantra is just a joke to fool buyers.

    • @Mabeylater293
      @Mabeylater293 3 роки тому +1

      @Jonathan A I checked consumer reports and the cvt is already showing signs of trouble. Not only that but more problems are showing up in other categories besides the transmission. Proof that Carlos Ghosn ( which is the era when even the “newer” cars were built ) was steadily producing more and more junk. He and Renault have ruined Nissan reliability. The Nissan Pathfinder 2013+ is an absolute disaster. Red circles everywhere.

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 3 роки тому

      @@Mabeylater293 went all the way back to 2013 lol which was the 1st year. How have they been in the last few years? I'm guessing pretty good without looking.

  • @Kyzzle112718
    @Kyzzle112718 3 роки тому +2

    To those who make a CVT comment, answer one simple question, How often are you to change your CVT fluid??

    • @elthansilvestre1568
      @elthansilvestre1568 3 роки тому

      9 speed automatic

    • @foxtrot685
      @foxtrot685 3 роки тому +4

      Most of them have never owned a vehicle with a CVT much less a Nissan, yet complain about them. And their crazy stories “my cousins had a rogue; 30 miles in the odometer and it blew up!! Traded it in for a Porsche Macan GTS... never again Nissan!!!” Yeah, okay 😂

    • @elthansilvestre1568
      @elthansilvestre1568 3 роки тому

      It is a 9 speed automatic

    • @onenikkione
      @onenikkione 3 роки тому +1

      every 30,000 miles and only use Nissan cvt fluid

    • @Kyzzle112718
      @Kyzzle112718 3 роки тому +2

      @@foxtrot685 People clout chase on Nissan UA-cam videos just to feel validated about their liked comments on bashing the CVT, and yes, they’ve NEVER owned one. I don’t expect much from folks who don’t even know the trim level of their vehicle, so I damn sure don’t expect the general public to know what the maintenance intervals are with their Nissans

  • @razvandobos9759
    @razvandobos9759 3 роки тому

    Really called the X-Trail

  • @demonsaint1296
    @demonsaint1296 3 роки тому +2

    Wish I had known about these Nissan cvt transmissions...... after putting 200k on one and up to 160k on another. Yes I have maintained them every 70k.

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 3 роки тому +2

      I put over 300k on my cvt and would def buy another cvt

  • @SoSorry4UrLoss
    @SoSorry4UrLoss 3 роки тому +4

    I wouldn't consider buying another Nissan again until they come up with a better CVT transmission. I had an Altima with one and it went up at 37K. Nissan wouldn't do anything about it except tell me it would cost about $6K to replace it.

    • @rafaelg9016
      @rafaelg9016 3 роки тому

      Newest CVTs are reliable and more responsive.

    • @Mabeylater293
      @Mabeylater293 3 роки тому

      @@rafaelg9016 more of the “new and improved” lie to lure in buyers/suckers.

    • @rafaelg9016
      @rafaelg9016 3 роки тому

      @@Mabeylater293 I’m not lying, yo can check reviews, ratings and data from owners.

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 3 роки тому

      What year altima and when did it go out?

    • @SoSorry4UrLoss
      @SoSorry4UrLoss 3 роки тому +1

      @@occckid123 it was a 2013. It crapped out at 37K miles. The funny thing is I took it back to the Nissan dealership 4 times with the same problem and was told "it's supposed to do that". I don't know about you but I don't think your car is supposed to shudder and slam into gear when you shift from park.

  • @nanachnanach7643
    @nanachnanach7643 3 роки тому +1

    Stop the cvt

  • @ramoncarter6585
    @ramoncarter6585 3 роки тому +3

    Good looking Rogue. I have a 2015 a car person but if looking buy a new SUV going be a Rogue.

  • @elthansilvestre1568
    @elthansilvestre1568 3 роки тому +1

    9 speed automatic

  • @cnfusd
    @cnfusd 3 роки тому +1

    Hyundai and Kia are making all the offerings from their Japanese counterparts (Honda, Toyota, Nissan) seem so boring..

  • @chadharmon5716
    @chadharmon5716 3 роки тому

    New Mitsubishi Outlander platform

  • @Mike-lj4ue
    @Mike-lj4ue 3 роки тому

    I’m waiting on the new frontier.

    • @onenikkione
      @onenikkione 3 роки тому

      and then wait for the new model to be out for at least 4 years to see if problems arise unless you are going to lease

    • @Mike-lj4ue
      @Mike-lj4ue 3 роки тому

      @@onenikkione I’m married to my vehicles. I guess I’ll have to wait 4 more years. My ram will be about 12 by then. It’ll be time.

  • @TheOfficialKeon
    @TheOfficialKeon 2 роки тому

    I’m not paying 40k for a CVT.

  • @jakp8777
    @jakp8777 3 роки тому +5

    People don’t buy Nissan because of the car. People buy Nissan because Nissan dealers finance anyone; repo ok, no job or social security number needed, bankruptcy ok, etc. Thats what I’ve seen local Nissan dealers advertise.

    • @scott8238
      @scott8238 3 роки тому

      I think that is a case by case stealership issue. I have bought two Nissans I haven't noticed that issue while financing.

    • @varunrajmit
      @varunrajmit 3 роки тому +3

      After test driving both new Nissan and new Rav4 I chose Nissan rouge Platinum ... its interior, exterior and especially features are much much better than rav4...rav4 looks old school for boring people... I didn't notice any difference in engine performance... new CVT is much better ... rav4 is overrated and overpriced!!! In case you don't trust Nissan the go with Honda ... Toyota lost its game in front of both Honda and Nissan for me att least

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 3 роки тому

      I purchased all my nissans with good credit when I could've purchased anything.

    • @jakp8777
      @jakp8777 3 роки тому +1

      @@occckid123 well then I guess all those ads I see don’t exist. Nissans have horrible resale because they are rental car queens and have tons of repos. You should have got something else.

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 3 роки тому

      @@jakp8777 I didn't want something else. This is what I wanted. With 346k miles on my car I don't regret ever buying my car at all.

  • @Bum_Hip
    @Bum_Hip 3 роки тому +1

    CVT, and no power. No thanks.

  • @nintendoatarikiller
    @nintendoatarikiller 3 роки тому +5

    The Outlander looks better, is made in Japan, and has a decade-long warranty.

  • @dang6684
    @dang6684 3 роки тому +1

    JATCO stay away

  • @87camro
    @87camro 3 роки тому

    The Mitsubishi version of this car (outlander) is the better choice same car with 10/yr 100k mile warranty

  • @SoCalBIGmike
    @SoCalBIGmike 3 роки тому +1

    Why would anyone pay this much for a Nissan vs. a Honda or Toyota? Nope.

  • @VietnamEli
    @VietnamEli 3 роки тому +10

    Stopped watching at "CVT". Sorry, Nissan, you need to ditch this.

    • @exquisiteart6478
      @exquisiteart6478 3 роки тому +6

      They moved to a ZF 9-speed unit in the new Pathfinder

    • @Seasonal50
      @Seasonal50 3 роки тому +3

      I’m glad the pathfinder finally ditched it

    • @digitaldoc100
      @digitaldoc100 3 роки тому +1

      @@exquisiteart6478 Need to lose the CVT across the line. Even tougher to justify in the Infiniti's.

    • @exquisiteart6478
      @exquisiteart6478 3 роки тому +1

      @@digitaldoc100 yeah, honestly 😅 Maybe on their base model cars like a Versa its okay but once you start going up, like a sentra, altima, maxima, and up to the Infiniti brand, a CVT is just out of pocket.

    • @moejr1974
      @moejr1974 3 роки тому +2

      @@digitaldoc100 CVT isn't going anywhere. The Gov't keeps raising the MPG requirements and CVT's are superior to regular transmissions in efficiency

  • @RoadCone411
    @RoadCone411 3 роки тому

    Am I the only one that finds the front to be ugly? I know Nissan wanted something distinctive, and I see where they were going, but I don't like the end product. Maybe it grows on you?
    The rest of the vehicle isn't too bad, honestly, and they finally nailed the cabin and dashboard, especially that gorgeous quilted trim on the top line. Even without it, I still like the Rogue's crisp new cabin. Now...about that CVT...it's not an automatic deal breaker for me but certainly a large demerit especially when there are good non-CVT alternatives out there in this market. I'll take my CX-5 in blue please.

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 3 роки тому

      So you get a cx-5 so you can be claustrophobic in? If you carry a family a 4 regularly and deal with strollers or lots of cargo I can guarantee you the rogue is the 1 u want 2 b in or you're family.

  • @grunkohlaktionar7474
    @grunkohlaktionar7474 3 роки тому +3

    I’d take the Outlander over this

  • @nickpatterson492
    @nickpatterson492 3 роки тому

    I WOULD CONSIDER THIS FOR FIRST CAR

  • @CherrySquishee
    @CherrySquishee 3 роки тому +3

    Waiting for that v6 option.

    • @digitaldoc100
      @digitaldoc100 3 роки тому +5

      Keep waiting. I was hoping for the 2.0T VCT from the Altima that the Rogue is based on. No sign of any optional engine. Good luck Nissan.

    • @digitaldoc100
      @digitaldoc100 3 роки тому +1

      @Jonathan A But some of the competition has a turbo. Guess Nissan does not want to stand out from the competition.

    • @CherrySquishee
      @CherrySquishee 3 роки тому

      I'm more of a Mitsu guy, which the Outlander had one from 2007 to 2020. The 6b series is a stout engine, the only downfall is the rubber timing belt. Since this is a new platform, I'm just hoping for the best.
      Still hoping for a nice sedan as well.

    • @Farman9
      @Farman9 3 роки тому +2

      That will be called "The Pathfinder" Will look similar with no CVT. CVT's just need to be maintained properly and you'll have no problem.

    • @digitaldoc100
      @digitaldoc100 3 роки тому

      @Jonathan A I think they don't want to compete with the Infiniti Q50. Bit a Rogue for 36k with a 4 cyl NA and a cvt is not gonna work either.

  • @FranBushardt
    @FranBushardt 6 місяців тому

    Compared to My Ford Escape, I got into a Rogue and Absolutely Hated the THING🤮 Nothing was Logically paced.. What a STUPID CONVOLUTED SHIFTER ITS GOT💩

  • @Joeromano95
    @Joeromano95 3 роки тому

    The Nissan rogue. Built for those who like to have their vehicles get lost in a crowd.

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 3 роки тому +2

      So then what's a crv and rav 4?

    • @knurlgnar24
      @knurlgnar24 3 роки тому +1

      Toyota. Built for those who want to drive something that looks like a hooker who got punched in the jaw. To each their own. I want to blend in. I don't want to stick out by being especially hideous.

  • @aaronkoch3273
    @aaronkoch3273 3 роки тому

    I'm having a really hard time believing anything you say after calling a Nissan SUV with a CVT worthy of anything other than a dumpster. Have any of you driven one for more than a week?

  • @gumbie007
    @gumbie007 3 роки тому +3

    Lost me at "CVT"....🤨😒😏

  • @BabyShark-cg3sz
    @BabyShark-cg3sz 3 роки тому

    Still would rather have my Mazda CX5....

  • @MartinGalway
    @MartinGalway 3 роки тому

    If it's so nice... if it really stands out from the crowd... why is Nissan struggling? Why aren't people buiying them?

    • @EnriqueGonzalez-qo5hn
      @EnriqueGonzalez-qo5hn 3 роки тому +1

      Yes exactly. Nissan is a zombie that's about to meet its maker. They're doing the bare minimum to even look like they're surviving, but they still have the same styling language and quality issues.

    • @sleeksilver
      @sleeksilver 3 роки тому +3

      What???
      TONS of people are buying them, they've sold a million of these since 2018. It's Nissan's best selling model.

    • @shawnpettis4118
      @shawnpettis4118 3 роки тому +1

      @@sleeksilver lol that’s what I was about to say idk what he is talking about all I see is Nissan cars and suv here in ny

  • @eyalschnider
    @eyalschnider 3 роки тому

    test vs forster

  • @320ifly
    @320ifly 3 роки тому

    Those headlights are hideous

  • @digitaldoc100
    @digitaldoc100 3 роки тому

    Terrible umdersteer in the slalom demonstrated. In the acceleration, note the back wheels not moving while the fronts brake traction, so where is the AWD? Less power than the RAV4 and CRV.

    • @digitaldoc100
      @digitaldoc100 3 роки тому

      @Jonathan A The CRV does have more power, as does most of the competition. Nissan should be more competitive.

    • @digitaldoc100
      @digitaldoc100 3 роки тому

      @Jonathan A Not sure why anyone wants to buy the car with the least power. Also, the CRV has a turbo, with a lower torque peak, which improves the driveability. I have driven it, and it felt more powerful than it was.

    • @moejr1974
      @moejr1974 3 роки тому

      He said the tester was FWD

    • @digitaldoc100
      @digitaldoc100 3 роки тому +1

      @@moejr1974 Missed that part. No point in a FWD SUV in the half of the country that gets snow.

    • @aaryeshg.6526
      @aaryeshg.6526 3 роки тому +1

      @@digitaldoc100 makes sense in other parts of the world. Where I live fwd crossovers are common.

  • @dang6684
    @dang6684 3 роки тому

    Nissan and outlander are both garbage buy toyota period

  • @LrulestheworldM8
    @LrulestheworldM8 3 роки тому

    Just awful. Nissan doesn't get what its customers want, and they don't care to figure it out either.

  • @rovert94
    @rovert94 3 роки тому

    This might be the most bland car on sale today.

  • @ajl9491
    @ajl9491 3 роки тому

    CVT goes BOOM, bye bye Nissan/Renault crap...

  • @basshead.
    @basshead. 3 роки тому

    1st