КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @dom_the3166
    @dom_the3166 Рік тому +36

    No matter how many times I learn this I always seem to forget it

    • @pratheesh2105
      @pratheesh2105 Рік тому +5

      Same! I keep coming back to this video

  • @BibtheChib
    @BibtheChib 5 років тому +18

    Legend! Excellent video, explained very simply but gets the point across perfectly!
    You must be a very good teacher/lecturer :)

  • @MrBossoTrosso
    @MrBossoTrosso 7 років тому +9

    Fantastic video!

  • @racingredchief
    @racingredchief 6 років тому +6

    very clear , thanks Jack

  • @Theobbr20
    @Theobbr20 3 роки тому +2

    What if there is a composite function for example ln(1+x) + cosx, would the range be -1

  • @vaneezaahmad9731
    @vaneezaahmad9731 4 роки тому +3

    Woah..This video was really helpful.
    Thanks a lot.

  • @kalvinjaved3120
    @kalvinjaved3120 5 місяців тому

    Very well explained. Thanks

  • @adolfkittler117
    @adolfkittler117 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks a bunch! You rock!

  • @edwarda.710
    @edwarda.710 6 років тому +1

    I understand the method of finding the range of validity however I am confused on what its significance is, I don't understand what it means, and why is there a modulus? can you explain it to me please?

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 6 років тому +4

      the range of validity tells you the values of x for which the expansion is valid. For infinite series expansions, they don't work for all values of x. So for example, (1-x)^(-1) = 1 + x + x^2 + x^3 + ... for |x| < 1. This means the expansion only works for -1 < x < 1.
      So if we sub in 2:
      LHS: (1-2)^(-1) = -1
      RHS: 1 + 2 + 2^2 + 2^3 + ... which is definitely not equal to -1
      If we sub in 0.5
      LHS: (1-0.5)^(-1) = 2
      RHS: 1 + 0.5^2 + 0.5^3 + ... which is equal to 2.
      So the expansion worked for a number between -1 and 1, but not for one outside this range of validity. These are just two examples, which certainly isn't a proof, but it shows what we're talking about.
      The modulus version of the range of validity |x| < a means exactly the same thing as -a < x < a

    • @edwarda.710
      @edwarda.710 6 років тому

      Jack Brown thank you so much!

  • @chemical_x5350
    @chemical_x5350 4 роки тому

    Why is there not a negative sign when shifting the fraction to the right side during finding validity?

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 4 роки тому

      The minus sign is "absorbed" by the modulus in the way that |-3| = |3|

  • @peanutsee
    @peanutsee 4 роки тому

    I don't know if this is a correct question to ask but, why is it that for the (1 + x) ^ n expansion, the range of validity if |X| < 1? Why the modulus?

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 4 роки тому +1

      |x|

    • @peanutsee
      @peanutsee 4 роки тому

      TLMaths Am I wrong to say this is similar to Sum to Infinity in a Geometric Progression?

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 4 роки тому +1

      You're not wrong

  • @vic8166
    @vic8166 3 роки тому

    Hi. How do we find valid value of x for
    | 1/(3x) | < 1 ? It's confusing because x is apart of the denominator.... So how do I write it in -1< x < 1 form ?

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 3 роки тому +1

      First sketch y = |1/(3x)|.
      Draw a horizontal line at y = 1.
      www.desmos.com/calculator/z7wwmcqxpe
      Then solve |1/(3x)| = 1:
      1/(3x) = 1 ⇒ 3x = 1 ⇒ x = 1/3
      -1/(3x) = 1 ⇒ 3x = -1 ⇒ x = -1/3
      Then answer the question "Where is the graph of y= |1/(3x)| BELOW y = 1?". The answer is (∞,-1/3)∪(1/3,∞)

  • @ritesha8050
    @ritesha8050 5 років тому

    what if im given a question involving both binomial and partial fraction. I have to expand 2 times and then add. but now its asking me how to write down the set of values for which expression is valid.
    in this case it was ((1-x)^-1) + ((1+x/2)^-1) - ((1+x/2)^-2) after expressing in partial fractions.
    how to do it???? help plz

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 5 років тому

      Well the first expansion is valid for |x|

    • @ritesha8050
      @ritesha8050 5 років тому +1

      Thanks a lot sir. I'm having a test tomorrow

  • @Alec09039
    @Alec09039 8 років тому +2

    How do you know whether to use the ≤ or < symbol?, in a question I did (4+2x)^1/2 the answer in the book stated lxl ≤ 2

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 8 років тому +2

      +Alec09039 It must be a typo, it should always be

    • @Alec09039
      @Alec09039 8 років тому +1

      Jack Brown Thanks

  • @yogendragupta8091
    @yogendragupta8091 3 роки тому

    Nice explanation

  • @georgedanilenko1435
    @georgedanilenko1435 3 роки тому

    Absolute legend

  • @mohammadriyaz1217
    @mohammadriyaz1217 5 років тому

    In the last question if you take (1+(1-7x))^ now apply the condition on mod |1-7x|

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 5 років тому +1

      I think this is a bit beyond what I know as really we're asking that if (1+x)^n is valid for |x|

    • @sofishso-fish-alchannel335
      @sofishso-fish-alchannel335 2 роки тому

      well, I think first you would expand the brackets to get (2-7x)^n, then factorising 2 out to get 2^n(1-7x/2) and repeat the process shown in the video: |-7x|

  • @tshovujosaphatkalanja5024
    @tshovujosaphatkalanja5024 4 роки тому

    what if you have a quadratic function let say power half maybe, how will you find the range..or how will you be able to 1 plus or minus something..

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 4 роки тому

      Can you give me an actual example of what you mean?

    • @tshovujosaphatkalanja5024
      @tshovujosaphatkalanja5024 4 роки тому

      @@TLMaths square root of (x^2-2+x)^7

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 4 роки тому

      So with this particular example you've chosen, you really start to open up a can of worms. Firstly, x^2 + x - 2 is negative for -2

    • @tshovujosaphatkalanja5024
      @tshovujosaphatkalanja5024 4 роки тому +1

      @@TLMaths thank you sir

  • @thomaskhiu5955
    @thomaskhiu5955 5 років тому +1

    What if the questions ask you to expand sin^-1x and state the range of values of x for which the expansion is valid

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 5 років тому +1

      It won't, it'll only ask for a binomial expansion.

  • @GiuseppePolitoSPQR
    @GiuseppePolitoSPQR 4 місяці тому

    Good video

  • @finlaymartins272
    @finlaymartins272 3 роки тому

    life saver, thanks for this!

  • @talvinjacobs6178
    @talvinjacobs6178 6 років тому +3

    Simple, easy, perfect. Thanks ^_^

  • @AceOfHearts001
    @AceOfHearts001 Рік тому

    Bravo! thanks.

  • @Tom-lq8wc
    @Tom-lq8wc 2 роки тому

    God amongst men 🙏

  • @Elliot733
    @Elliot733 9 років тому

    Instead of bringing the 2^1/3 outside of the brackets (which is slightly more complicated), couldn't you just do |-7x| < 2 and then divide through by 7 (mod takes care of the neg.) giving you |x| < 2/7

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 9 років тому +1

      Elliot 73 This is true. However, in general, if you were required to expand (2-7x)^(1/3), you will need to factor out the 2^(1/3) in order to use the formula (1+x)^n as seen in the formula booklet. The likelihood would be that a question would ask you to expand first and then ask about which values it would be valid for afterwards, so the factoring out would already have occurred.

    • @Elliot733
      @Elliot733 9 років тому

      Jack Brown Ah, yeah, that makes sense. Thanks for the reply!

  • @farzanask03
    @farzanask03 Рік тому

    Thanks a lot!

  • @sayaistheweather4517
    @sayaistheweather4517 2 роки тому

    Thankss!!!

  • @cottoncandy4429
    @cottoncandy4429 2 роки тому

    What if it was (1+x^2)^2?

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 2 роки тому

      Do you mean if it was (1+x^2)^(-2) ?

    • @cottoncandy4429
      @cottoncandy4429 2 роки тому

      @@TLMaths yes

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 2 роки тому +1

      Then replace x with x^2 in the range of validity:
      |x^2| < 1
      so -1 < x < 1

    • @cottoncandy4429
      @cottoncandy4429 2 роки тому

      @@TLMaths thanks!!

  • @becoached8592
    @becoached8592 3 роки тому

    bruh amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @poddyruddy9221
    @poddyruddy9221 5 місяців тому

    🐐

  • @jz3837
    @jz3837 2 роки тому

    thanks

  • @chemical_x5350
    @chemical_x5350 4 роки тому

    My teacher literally copied his entire lecture from this video with every SAME example and explained it in the class. 😑

    • @TLMaths
      @TLMaths 4 роки тому +2

      If it helps, that can only be a good thing. Remember, your teacher is learning too as it may be their first time teaching this topic.

  • @Harikrishnan-mo7tm
    @Harikrishnan-mo7tm 6 років тому

    thankyou.