If our eyes detected different wavelengths, we'd still think it was pretty. Those colours don't exist anywhere else except for your consciousness. They're merely electromagnetic vibrations in space-time. They don't have a colour.
How vast those orbs (stars) must be And how inconsiderable this earth, the theatre upon which all our mighty designs, all our navigations, and all our wars are transacted, is in comparison to them. A very fit consideration and matter of reflection for all the Kings and princes who sacrificed the lives of so many people only to flatter their ambition of being masters of some pitiful corner on this small spot. Christiaan Huygens Best quotation ever.
And remember, if you beleive in god and the bible, god got mad because the tower of babel, when men try to make it to heaven, and he created the different language as a barrier for humans, now science broke all those barriers, #WheresYourgodNow
@@HoudiniGTP the original quip remains. why fish eye? Why would a "satellite" manufacture use a "go pro"? Everyone with a capacity for critical thought and reasoning knows why. Its laughable. Maybe in 2015, but 2022. [\derp]
@@einienj3281 it should look like the fastest thing you’ve ever seen in your life. A bullet travels avg 1,700 mph vs earth traveling 1,300,000 mph. Clearly, they are lying 🤥
@@str8legit713 So how is that supposed to work? When you fly in a plane, the earth doesn't escape from under it... Same with rockets, satellites.. and the moon is moving with us.. We move with the sun and it with our galaxy and it with other galaxies and so on.. Everything moves in relation to each other.. it's called gravity.. you should check it out..
@@einienj3281 gravity has nothing to do with being able to SEE 👀 something moving. Earth does not move unless an EARTHQUAKE. That can be seen, felt, and measured. Earth is stationary. That’s why it’s never been observed moving by anyone or any camera.
@@str8legit713 Dear doG.. if you don't understand what I said earlier, then there's nothing else I can say, that would make more sense to you.. there's videos about it, they might be able to explain it to you, in a way that I can't.. I don't have the energy for it..
I cannot vouch for the provenance of any shots of the Earth from space. But I can vouch that you can see the satellites at night from the ground. I can also vouch: You can do a really simple triangulation experiment, with the help of a friend living a hundred km away or more, to measure their altitudes and groundspeeds - and they always come out as over 200km up and speeds of km/sec. You can get larger, lower satellites in an entry-level telescope and make out their shapes, and with a simple ham radio set and a directional antenna you can track the signals they produce, confirming that these are signal producing machines. That doesn't slam-dunk make the world round, but it does mean these machines must have a powerful and unknown form of propulsion, and are working at altitudes only rockets are known to reach as delivery systems. I can vouch that, at over a dozen locations I've checked, large distant objects disappear bottom-first behind the horizon, and the hidden sections cannot be recovered with high magnification, but can be recovered by increasing viewer height, as if the surface is humped, or continuously curved. I can vouch that this is the normal effect to see, and is present on dozens of repeated viewings at the same location, over several years. I can vouch that the constellations visible nearly over head in the northern hemisphere are right down on the northern horizon when seen near the equator, and are behind the horizon from the southern hemisphere. Completely different constellations, that rotate nightly around a different point than the northern constellations, are visible over head in the southern hemisphere - as expected from the 'globe model'. I can vouch that the Sun and Moon move the same way in the northern hemisphere as they do in the southern. I'll vouch that at high northern and southern lattitudes (such as northern scotland and southern Australia) they describe a nearly complete circle around the sky, dropping below the horizon only for a few hours, as predicted by the 'globe model'. I can vouch that the Sun does not change apparent size or shape in any significant way between 6am, 12 noon, and 6pm (I've used a solar filter to photograph it and measure the apparent size to within 1%), as predicted by the model of the Sun's distance being very very large compared to the size of the world, and it's dropping behind the horizon being genuine, and it's shape not being significantly distorted by any refractive effects. I could go on and on, but most importantly I can vouch that all of the above is checkable and verifiable by any independent investigator, because I've done these things myself, often many times - actually doing my own research in the real world, not watching videos on youtube or accepting claims on blogs or websites. Don't take my word for it, if anyone wants to verify my observations I'm very very happy to supply locations, methods and equipment used etc etc.. So I feel confident in saying that, if the world is flat, it is absolutely filled with very finely tuned, very consistent natural illusions that make it seem and behave as though it's curved in all directions - so you will need to apply the curved model regardless to get anything done (like navigation, communications ect) over long distances.
@@stormhound1973 It's cool, I have a standard reply to these guys on a word doc, I just adjust it. And I do quite like the real flat earthers in a round-about way: If not for them I would never have thought to do all those experiments myself, or gotten back into satellite spotting and astronomy as a hobby :)
@@jagheterbanan No, it's just on a flash drive- but it's pretty much the reply I gave above. I usually take out any bits that aren't relevant to what the FE proponent is claiming, but today, for some reason, I'm feeling very forthright so i just dropped the whole thing with some tweaking to make sure it wasn't too hard to follow. It's very long now I see it on an actual comment, I'll probably go back to just selecting parts in future. But, like I said, it's been very interesting getting to the point where I can say I've done all that :)
Gosh we have a pretty planet! And so handy that our vision receptors are tuned to these wavelengths!
That's Evolution, buddy.
@@raykewin3608 Evolution sounds about r... ong
Well said !!
@@lookingfortruth1930 ?
If our eyes detected different wavelengths, we'd still think it was pretty.
Those colours don't exist anywhere else except for your consciousness. They're merely electromagnetic vibrations in space-time. They don't have a colour.
Never ceases to amaze me.
Wow.. Just Wow!!!!
Wow the fish eye really makes the earth look round
First AGAIN, W video like always and amazing photo, really shows how far we’ve gotten. We can see half the world with one photo!
And every single human in the universe is down there.. (well astronauts aren't, but still..)
@@einienj3281 exactly
@@warhero2468 Makes You think we should try harder to get along, doesn't it?
@@einienj3281 yes I agree, everything would be a lot easier and much simpler than the way we live now
@@warhero2468 That blue pearl is literally all we have.. and in the scale of the universe, it's not a lot..
Beautiful view from space
Beautiful, truly beautiful.
I concur
BELLISIMO!! 🌍❤️
Great view..but I see something white thingy floating at 0:20 on upper right? Moon? ISS? What is it?
No idea, but deffo not moon and i don't think it's ISS.
Stunning beauty! ♥️🌍
Now....you see, flat-earthers??? The Earth isn't flat...it's a football. 🏈
😆😆
Fish eye lenses obviously
@@lookingfortruth1930 what a view!
Amazing view! What’s the satellite orbital altitude?
About 500 km.
Specifically, it's in a 491 x 507 km x 97.4 deg inclination orbit, COSPAR ID 2022-033N .
@@turkosicsaba
Great, thanks! 👍
ISS in background??
@@midixiewrecked7011
It's the Moon.
@@Trex531 it's moving though .
Fantastic ...
Woow! Beautiful!
Amazing !
So sad this is not live camera, this will be great idea
That would have been an awesome idea!
Just WOW!
What a wonderful earth.
I..is that cloud why it rained today? Fff... Wow
wow that is nice video.
Why am I seeing a sad bearded guy with a soothing music playing?.
How high?
It is indeed beautiful and looks so peaceful, but the fact that theres a barbaric war going on down there truly breaks my heart.
We are a short sighted species. I hope one day we grow out of our infancy.
Ah look - far north Queensland & the GBR. I've swum there.
Epic.
Can somebody do a 1 hour edit of this and send the link to me? Beautiful
waiting for all the flat Earther comments 🤣
Gorgeous view
😀😀😀👍
Gopro wide angle settings make even the flat earth look round! Lol
That's the only reason I came to the comments 😄
Yes check the first few seconds as the fish eye lens adjusts, even the surface of the earth morphs 🤔
😎
How high is this??
About 500km
To bad it won’t be that beautiful for long at the pace and direction humanity is heading
That is 1 round world
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟💙🤗
How vast those orbs (stars) must be
And how inconsiderable this earth, the theatre upon which all our mighty designs, all our navigations, and all our wars are transacted, is in comparison to them.
A very fit consideration and matter of reflection for all the Kings and princes who sacrificed the lives of so many people only to flatter their ambition of being masters of some pitiful corner on this small spot.
Christiaan Huygens
Best quotation ever.
Happy Wednesday 🌟🌍🌏🌎
dont let the Flerfs fool you this , is not cgi
🥰
This footage is bad news for flat earthers
PRIMEIRO 😇😇🙏🙏❤❤
CHICLAYO PERU 🇩🇪
Nice but why?
😭😭😭♥️🌏🌎🌍♥️♥️♥️♥️
Where the flat earthers at
See I told you it was flat!
And remember, if you beleive in god and the bible, god got mad because the tower of babel, when men try to make it to heaven, and he created the different language as a barrier for humans, now science broke all those barriers, #WheresYourgodNow
why fish eye?
Because that's what GoPro uses in their cameras. Go cry to them.
@@HoudiniGTP great logic. The company that uses fish eye lenses uses fish eye lenses. That's why we use fish eye lenses. [/derp]
@@useyournous Cute little embellishment you made there but that's not what I said. I said that's what GoPro uses in their cameras. Was I wrong?
@@HoudiniGTP the original quip remains. why fish eye? Why would a "satellite" manufacture use a "go pro"? Everyone with a capacity for critical thought and reasoning knows why. Its laughable. Maybe in 2015, but 2022. [\derp]
@@useyournous Oh I got it! Don't tell me, they're trying to show "fake curvature" on a "flat earth". Now THAT'S laughable! 😅 [\derp]
fish eye camera... not real
I’m pretty sure GoPros are real.
Earth doesn’t look like it’s traveling 1.3 MILLION MPH 🤡😂
What should it look like then? The satellite is moving around the earth and with the earth...
@@einienj3281 it should look like the fastest thing you’ve ever seen in your life. A bullet travels avg 1,700 mph vs earth traveling 1,300,000 mph. Clearly, they are lying 🤥
@@str8legit713 So how is that supposed to work? When you fly in a plane, the earth doesn't escape from under it... Same with rockets, satellites.. and the moon is moving with us.. We move with the sun and it with our galaxy and it with other galaxies and so on.. Everything moves in relation to each other.. it's called gravity.. you should check it out..
@@einienj3281 gravity has nothing to do with being able to SEE 👀 something moving. Earth does not move unless an EARTHQUAKE. That can be seen, felt, and measured. Earth is stationary. That’s why it’s never been observed moving by anyone or any camera.
@@str8legit713 Dear doG.. if you don't understand what I said earlier, then there's nothing else I can say, that would make more sense to you.. there's videos about it, they might be able to explain it to you, in a way that I can't.. I don't have the energy for it..
Haha 😂 - Freeze it during that wobble at the start and the Earth is completely flat ….. More fish eye lens crap!
Doesn't make it flat you bozo
My kid does better cgi
I cannot vouch for the provenance of any shots of the Earth from space. But I can vouch that you can see the satellites at night from the ground. I can also vouch: You can do a really simple triangulation experiment, with the help of a friend living a hundred km away or more, to measure their altitudes and groundspeeds - and they always come out as over 200km up and speeds of km/sec. You can get larger, lower satellites in an entry-level telescope and make out their shapes, and with a simple ham radio set and a directional antenna you can track the signals they produce, confirming that these are signal producing machines.
That doesn't slam-dunk make the world round, but it does mean these machines must have a powerful and unknown form of propulsion, and are working at altitudes only rockets are known to reach as delivery systems.
I can vouch that, at over a dozen locations I've checked, large distant objects disappear bottom-first behind the horizon, and the hidden sections cannot be recovered with high magnification, but can be recovered by increasing viewer height, as if the surface is humped, or continuously curved. I can vouch that this is the normal effect to see, and is present on dozens of repeated viewings at the same location, over several years.
I can vouch that the constellations visible nearly over head in the northern hemisphere are right down on the northern horizon when seen near the equator, and are behind the horizon from the southern hemisphere. Completely different constellations, that rotate nightly around a different point than the northern constellations, are visible over head in the southern hemisphere - as expected from the 'globe model'.
I can vouch that the Sun and Moon move the same way in the northern hemisphere as they do in the southern. I'll vouch that at high northern and southern lattitudes (such as northern scotland and southern Australia) they describe a nearly complete circle around the sky, dropping below the horizon only for a few hours, as predicted by the 'globe model'.
I can vouch that the Sun does not change apparent size or shape in any significant way between 6am, 12 noon, and 6pm (I've used a solar filter to photograph it and measure the apparent size to within 1%), as predicted by the model of the Sun's distance being very very large compared to the size of the world, and it's dropping behind the horizon being genuine, and it's shape not being significantly distorted by any refractive effects.
I could go on and on, but most importantly I can vouch that all of the above is checkable and verifiable by any independent investigator, because I've done these things myself, often many times - actually doing my own research in the real world, not watching videos on youtube or accepting claims on blogs or websites. Don't take my word for it, if anyone wants to verify my observations I'm very very happy to supply locations, methods and equipment used etc etc..
So I feel confident in saying that, if the world is flat, it is absolutely filled with very finely tuned, very consistent natural illusions that make it seem and behave as though it's curved in all directions - so you will need to apply the curved model regardless to get anything done (like navigation, communications ect) over long distances.
@@studentjohn Don't worry, that guy is just a troll
@@stormhound1973 It's cool, I have a standard reply to these guys on a word doc, I just adjust it. And I do quite like the real flat earthers in a round-about way: If not for them I would never have thought to do all those experiments myself, or gotten back into satellite spotting and astronomy as a hobby :)
Would love to see that, you have a link?
@@jagheterbanan No, it's just on a flash drive- but it's pretty much the reply I gave above. I usually take out any bits that aren't relevant to what the FE proponent is claiming, but today, for some reason, I'm feeling very forthright so i just dropped the whole thing with some tweaking to make sure it wasn't too hard to follow.
It's very long now I see it on an actual comment, I'll probably go back to just selecting parts in future. But, like I said, it's been very interesting getting to the point where I can say I've done all that :)