Nissan X-Trail 1.3 160HP - Too Small An Engine?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @philiparmitage4756
    @philiparmitage4756 8 днів тому

    We bought this 1.3 petrol X trail , we had the 1.6 diesel before. Yes it's a little less economical but not by much.... much much smoother and nicer to drive, quieter, cheaper fuel, cheaper to service. And definitely better if you're doing shorter journeys .

  • @keithwitts2177
    @keithwitts2177 3 роки тому +3

    Very well presented review,followed your advice.
    Had a test drive then bought one.

  • @AngryBritain
    @AngryBritain 4 роки тому +3

    What a great video. Everything you need to know. Cheers. Was thinking about the 1.7, now probably not.

  • @allanburgess4577
    @allanburgess4577 4 роки тому +4

    Excellent review just ordered one in the same colour. Thank you.

  • @Vaderdk
    @Vaderdk 5 років тому +2

    Vaderdk
    I have got the same engine in the Kadjar, it is a gem of a engine. Drives perfekt. I average around 6,2 liter of fuel pr. 100 km great. 😀

  •  4 роки тому +4

    Odličan engleski!

  • @zvonimirgasparovski2435
    @zvonimirgasparovski2435 5 років тому +2

    Hi, excellent review!!! I bought same car one month ago in Rijeka, trim N-Connecta. Smoth ride, average consumption 7-7.5 L per 100 km. Engine is violin!

    • @ivicaorlovic8358
      @ivicaorlovic8358 5 років тому

      Pozdrav, kakav vam se DCT pokazao?

    • @zvonimirgasparovski2435
      @zvonimirgasparovski2435 5 років тому

      Ivica Orlovic Zivili Ivica, DCT je fantastican. Lijepo mijenja brzine, brzo i bez trzaja. Ne bi se vise vracao na rucni mjenjac.

    • @ivicaorlovic8358
      @ivicaorlovic8358 5 років тому

      @@zvonimirgasparovski2435 hvala na odgovoru, koliko vidim hvale ovaj spoj motor+DCT uz minimalnu potrošnju za ovakav auto, jedino pitanje koje se postavlja je trajnost motora obzirom na mali obujam, a veliku kompresiju? Pretpostavljam da je isti napravljen kako bi se zadovoljile strože ekološke norme 6d

    • @zvonimirgasparovski2435
      @zvonimirgasparovski2435 5 років тому

      Ivica Orlovic , 1.3 L na ovom autu uistinu izgleda malo plasljivo, bar ispocetka... Na internetu pisu svasta, vrijeme ce pokazati. Garancija je 160 000 km, pa mi se cini da Nissan zna sa cim raspolaze🤗

    • @ivicaorlovic8358
      @ivicaorlovic8358 5 років тому

      Da istina,uostalo Mercedes je imao lošu prošlu B klasu, a sad u novu ugrađuju ovaj motor, valjda je to neka garancija 🙂

  • @zurabshaverdashvili9010
    @zurabshaverdashvili9010 4 роки тому +3

    Hi, thanks for interesting Review. Does the car accelerate good enough with 1,3 Engine wenn it is overloaded? Does anyone have an experience with that? Thanks.

  • @davidaubeeluck3284
    @davidaubeeluck3284 5 років тому +1

    This car is a very powerful and amazing car a like it😀

  • @NameNaameNameeNaamee
    @NameNaameNameeNaamee 4 роки тому

    It has to be said that the 1.3 fit's the qashqai a lot better than the X-Trail. In the X-Trail, it is significantly louder, both concerning the motor itself and the transmission noises. And the car itself is a lot louder as well. Nissan seems to have stripped away a lot of the dampening of the xtrail to provide adequate fuel consumption for the 1.3. Road noise is super high with this motor. Not so with the Diesels.

  • @ivebx
    @ivebx 4 роки тому +2

    I had this as a courtesy car 🚗 when my Mercedes E350d went into the garage for a suspension maintenance issue. The 1.3 litre engine is harsh, doesn't work well with the jerky gearbox, 160bhp struggles to deliver a time of 12 seconds to get to 60 miles.
    The handling is poor and body roll quite bad. Rattles are also noticeable, this, in a brand new vehicle.
    The trim is nice, with panoramic roof, cooled centre console and electronic automatic breaking system.
    Surprisingly I found it more thirsty (poorer mpg figures) compared to the 3 litre diesel Mercedes E350d Tourer.
    Sadly, this vehicle just isn't my cup of tea.
    The front-wheel drive is also a massive let down, this car needs 4 wheel drive for traction. Sadly, it struggles without it. Try accelerating and it will not only struggle for traction, it will pull marginally to the side. Awful.
    Out of 10? It get's a maximum points tally of 3.
    Poor.

    • @rc29
      @rc29 3 роки тому

      I had nissan quasqui 1.3 petrol turbo. it was faster than my merc 3.2cdi cls. is quick for 1.3. I literally beat anyone on traffic lights.

    • @rc29
      @rc29 3 роки тому

      mpg is about 48mpg mix urban

    • @julianhawkins9423
      @julianhawkins9423 Рік тому

      Yes but you drive a 350 d merc hardly a comparison

  • @hasibkhan2299
    @hasibkhan2299 2 роки тому +1

    Its not true about the Fuel consumption... I get only 5-6 km/L ...
    Which it just Worst for a 1.3L engine ..

  • @manuoro9859
    @manuoro9859 5 років тому

    Thanks for your video. I have the same car but 1.6 lt. I want to change for this one. Regard!

  • @mahmudurrahman4494
    @mahmudurrahman4494 2 роки тому

    how many liter mobil in this engine when i change the mobil

  • @obasaran35
    @obasaran35 4 роки тому

    I can guess what will happen when you try to climb with 5 people and full trunk. It can be ok if you drive alone with an empty trunk. Future is high torque electric enines'.

  • @leukaemiawarrior
    @leukaemiawarrior 4 роки тому

    Great review. Just otderes one 👍

  • @pkineu2503
    @pkineu2503 2 роки тому

    I bouth same car but in city 12Liter 100km

  • @soultanasmaga9661
    @soultanasmaga9661 Рік тому +1

    Tnnrnr

  • @vladmarius9181
    @vladmarius9181 5 років тому +2

    I wouldn't buy this , definitely.