Appearance and Reality: The One-Many Problem (65)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
  • This video is about Appearance and Reality: The One-Many Problem (65)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @2222cream
    @2222cream 2 роки тому +3

    This is a monumental presentation , so well explained

  • @ΚΡΑΤΥΛΟΣΕΡΜΟΓΕΝΗΣ

    Excellent lecture and lecturer. But would it be so difficult to tell the questioners to use a microphone? As my mother tongue is Greek and not English I don' t understand what they are asking for... and try to guess the questions or commentaries from the teacher's answeres....

  • @raycosmic9019
    @raycosmic9019 Рік тому +2

    The best or highest good is the all-inclusive One. The All in One in All.
    What appears as separate and opposite, is in Reality - Continuum.
    It is the nature of the all-inclusive One without a second to 'Serve' as the All in One in All Continuum of Being that functions as a diversified unity of Infinite potential (Creative Intelligence), Eternally actualizing as a unified diversity or Uni-verse of experience.
    Because the actualization of Infinite potential is Eternal, the conversion of potential into actual is indefinite, emergent.
    Integration = Integrity = Excellence
    Excellence = Goodness, Truth, Grace, Beauty, Creative Empowerment.
    The abstract called Love, can be expressed concretely as a hug, etc.
    Unity = All-inclusive Continuum

  • @chrisparker2118
    @chrisparker2118 2 роки тому

    Duality forms unity. It's the secret of creation itself.

    • @raycosmic9019
      @raycosmic9019 Рік тому

      What appears as duality is in Reality phases of unity.

  • @kevinkealy1576
    @kevinkealy1576 6 років тому

    imagine 1 in 11 dimentions explained on blackboard.

  • @waruiboya2575
    @waruiboya2575 5 років тому +1

    It ought to be : 0 and Many. 1 itself is part of Many. 1 cannot have a limit but can only proliferate. 0 is the only limit. It eternally exists (if that's even a word you can use for it) as a limitless limit. And a complex, seemingly limitless Many-ness can mathematically be made to lead to a remainder of 0.

    • @waruiboya2575
      @waruiboya2575 5 років тому

      And this 0 is what some call the Brahman, the Dao, etc.

    • @MysticFiddler1
      @MysticFiddler1 4 роки тому

      Heh. You sound like a fellow (sister) database designer. Database design parallels universal design, in which zero to many is well understood.

  • @theyoungmind9897
    @theyoungmind9897 6 років тому +1

    Good lecture bad lecturer. Smart Plotinus and proclus being presented, unsmart man giving only his answers and can't answer others sufficiently. But lecture itself was beautiful. And the knowledge therewith.

    • @wildeirishpoet
      @wildeirishpoet 6 років тому

      And I think Pierre charges for these lectures...

    • @vegasvibes5643
      @vegasvibes5643 5 років тому +5

      Your ignorance is astonishing

  • @yada3021
    @yada3021 Місяць тому

    Who is this professor?

  • @ashraf6435
    @ashraf6435 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent lecture!

  • @waruiboya2575
    @waruiboya2575 3 роки тому +1

    The Dao (0) produced One; One produced Two; Two produced Three;
    Three produced All things. (Dao De Jing, Chapter 42, James Legge translation)

    • @waruiboya2575
      @waruiboya2575 3 роки тому

      From 1 to many is still conceivable by the human mind. But this leap from 0 to 1, and to even try to conceive what 0 is or means, is the mystery of all mysteries.

    • @waruiboya2575
      @waruiboya2575 3 роки тому

      As the Nasadiya Sukta of the Rig Veda states, "Whence all creation had its origin.....He knows - or maybe even He does not know." Even God (1) has no idea how He/It came about from Dao/Brahman/Shunyata (0).

    • @waruiboya2575
      @waruiboya2575 3 роки тому

      In brief: 0 is inconceivable; 1, 2, 3...many = conceivable.

    • @simban00
      @simban00 3 роки тому

      @@waruiboya2575 0 means nothing. Nothing is nothing, does not produce, does not exist, unless you want it to.

    • @waruiboya2575
      @waruiboya2575 3 роки тому

      @@simban00 Nothing is still conceivable. Nothing basically means the absence of 1 or many. 0 cannot be conceivable, and so it is not merely "nothing".