Elastic Collisions In One Dimension Physics Problems - Conservation of Momentum & Kinetic Energy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 412

  • @TheOrganicChemistryTutor
    @TheOrganicChemistryTutor  2 роки тому +21

    Momentum - Free Formula Sheet: bit.ly/4fg6IvJ
    Momentum - Test - 47 Problems: bit.ly/3Qj9FjO
    Physics 1 Final Exam Review: ua-cam.com/video/CwkhvFlNFp0/v-deo.html
    Physics PDF Worksheets: www.video-tutor.net/physics-basic-introduction.html
    Next Video: ua-cam.com/video/9YRgHikdcqs/v-deo.html

  • @jacobwansleeben3364
    @jacobwansleeben3364 3 роки тому +990

    For anyone wondering where the formula v1 + v1' = v2 + v2' comes from, this is it:
    In a collision between two objects, net momentum is conserved, therefore:
    p1 + p2 = p1' + p2'
    This can be expanded to:
    (m1 x v1) + (m2 x v2) = (m1 x v1') + (m2 x v2')
    Next, we subtract (m1 x v1') from both sides of the equation:
    (m1 x v1) + (m2 x v2) - (m1 x v1') = (m2 x v2')
    Then, we subtract (m2 x v2) from both sides of the equation:
    (m1 x v1) - (m1 x v1') = (m2 x v2') - (m2 x v2)
    Next, we group similar terms:
    m1(v1 - v1') = m2(v2' - v2)
    Finally, we can make m1 the subject of the equation by dividing both sides by (v1 - v1'):
    m1 = m2(v2' - v2) / (v1 - v1')
    Put a mental pin on this equation, we'll come back to it later.
    An elastic collision is defined as a collision where net kinetic energy is conserved, therefore:
    Ek1 + Ek2 = Ek1' + Ek2'.
    This can be expanded to:
    (1/2 x m1 x v1^2) + (1/2 x m2 x v2^2) = (1/2 x m1 x v1'^2) + (1/2 x m2 x v2'^2)
    Next, we multiply both sides of the equation by two to get:
    (m1 x v1^2) + (m2 x v2^2) = (m1 x v1'^2) + (m2 x v2'^2).
    Then, we subtract (m1 x v1'^2) from both sides of the equation to get:
    (m1 x v1^2) + (m2 x v2^2) - (m1 x v1'^2) = (m2 x v2'^2)
    Then, we subtract (m2 x v2^2) from both sides to get:
    (m1 x v1^2) - (m1 x v1'^2) = (m2 x v2'^2) - (m2 x v2^2)
    Next, we group similar terms:
    m1(v1^2 - v1'^2) = m2(v2'^2 - v2^2)
    We can now go back to the pinned equation and, using substitution, replace m1 with (m2(v2' - v2) / (v1 - v1')):
    (m2(v2' - v2) / (v1 - v1')) x (v1^2 - v1'^2) = m2(v2'^2 - v2^2)
    Now get rid of the extra brackets:
    m2(v2' - v2) / (v1 - v1') x (v1^2 - v1'^2) = m2(v2'^2 - v2^2)
    Now divide both sides by m2:
    (v2' - v2) / (v1 - v1') x (v1^2 - v1'^2) = (v2'^2 - v2^2)
    Now divide both sides by (v1^2 - v1'^2):
    (v2' - v2) / (v1 - v1') = (v2'^2 - v2^2) / (v1^2 - v1'^2)
    Now expand the squares:
    (v2' - v2) / (v1 - v1') = (v2' - v2)(v2' + v2) / (v1 - v1')(v1 + v1')
    Now multiply both sides by (v1 - v1'):
    (v2' - v2) = (v2' - v2)(v2' + v2) / (v1 + v1')
    Now divide both sides by (v2' - v2):
    1 = (v2' + v2) / (v1 + v1')
    Finally, multiply both sides by (v1 + v1'):
    (v1 + v1') = (v2' + v2)
    Get rid of the brackets:
    v1 + v1' = v2' + v2
    This can be rearranged to:
    v1 + v1' = v2 + v2'
    Thx for listening to my TED Talk

    • @zyn11_
      @zyn11_ 3 роки тому +56

      😳

    • @aleenaaleyammasabu6030
      @aleenaaleyammasabu6030 3 роки тому +43

      😵😵

    • @murraykey5531
      @murraykey5531 3 роки тому +25

      yo, thanks bro

    • @jacobwansleeben3364
      @jacobwansleeben3364 3 роки тому +81

      In summary, the formula comes from using substitution to combine the formulas for conservation of momentum and conservation of kinetic energy, followed by simplification. It's therefore important to note that the formula v1 + v1' = v2 + v2' only applies to elastic collisions because this is the only kind of collision in which kinetic energy is conserved; it does NOT apply to inelastic collisions.

    • @youcannotspeaktomeanyhow
      @youcannotspeaktomeanyhow 3 роки тому +17

      I applaud your dedication. Thankyou!

  • @patpat1982
    @patpat1982 5 років тому +933

    We should really not skip ads as payback for the goodness this man has given.

  • @shayshay1061
    @shayshay1061 5 років тому +62

    Thank you so much for your videos! I take college physics and my professor is not good at all. I spend an hour in his class and learn way more watching your 15 minutes videos. You're awesome!!

  • @catmanjones1124
    @catmanjones1124 5 років тому +139

    your videos are getting me through my degree lol ur a better teacher than many of my professors

  • @jazfacts
    @jazfacts 6 років тому +33

    This explanation saved my life and my career as a physics student. you wouldn't believe how confusing my textbook is at explaining this. thank you so much!

    • @celeryystick
      @celeryystick 6 років тому

      Jasmine Young fr I’m so happy

    • @jananpatel9030
      @jananpatel9030 2 роки тому

      Textbooks have to make everything more complicated than it should be. I don't care about the specifics, I just want to finish this course lol

  • @zianrussellnarvaez3793
    @zianrussellnarvaez3793 Рік тому +7

    I am a college student and last week, we just solved a collision problem that can't be solve with just one equation like your example. The solution our teacher taught us takes about 10 mins to use and we find it so difficult. After watching this video now, I am so amazed that those 10 mins can be shortened into 2 mins by this method that you taught (use velocities instead of KE). Thank you so much man.

  • @jazfacts
    @jazfacts 6 років тому +208

    Thank you Jesus! Finally, something that makes sense. I prayed over this and I was brought to this video. God is so good

  • @justpeachy7331
    @justpeachy7331 4 роки тому +820

    yea failing my test tomorrow

  • @chrismbangweta721
    @chrismbangweta721 2 роки тому +3

    You the only UA-camr that makes me understand physics
    Watching from Zambia 🇿🇲

  • @zannatulferdous9087
    @zannatulferdous9087 6 років тому +16

    The textbook does no justice, thank you soooo much!!!

  • @ghis8482
    @ghis8482 4 роки тому +7

    I hope people never stop making this kind of videos

  • @mrtomatoking8562
    @mrtomatoking8562 Рік тому +3

    this man is saving my semester, thanks

  • @ellaboehme6748
    @ellaboehme6748 Місяць тому

    this is SO much easier than the method my professor is having us do. like the algebra is so much easier and it's way less time-consuming. thank you!!!!

  • @tianyuema4797
    @tianyuema4797 Рік тому

    Thank you! I could not find a video about this topic no matter how hard I searched, but it seems like you have come to my rescue once again. Thank you so much!

  • @Watermeba
    @Watermeba 6 років тому +46

    Can you explain how you got the v1 + v1' = v2 + v2' from the kinetic conservation equation? I started from them all being 1/2mv^2 and I can't get rid of the m. Its really confusing how you could just simplify it that way.

    • @zannatulferdous9087
      @zannatulferdous9087 6 років тому +5

      If they all have an m , then the m's cancel out.

    • @rishuraviraj8850
      @rishuraviraj8850 6 років тому +1

      But KE is proportional to v^2

    • @FrederikFalk21
      @FrederikFalk21 6 років тому +20

      Take the kinetic energy equation and divide by the linear momentum equation. Only V's will remain.

    • @AshleyashAshey
      @AshleyashAshey 6 років тому

      thank you!!

    • @TheGopukumar
      @TheGopukumar 5 років тому +1

      @Nedgy Thank you so much. You have added the real value to this stream of discussion.

  • @OtakunoShojo
    @OtakunoShojo 5 років тому +15

    thank you for explaining all this clearly- it helped me a lot

  • @burfrob
    @burfrob 5 років тому +7

    I love you, it's 1 in the morning and i'm better now

  • @Jannat-dq7gh
    @Jannat-dq7gh 4 роки тому +5

    Simple formulas of velocities of balls after collision are V1'=(m1-m2/m1+m2)/v1..And for velocity of 2nd ball after collision is v2'=(2m1v1)/m1+m2..

    • @Jannat-dq7gh
      @Jannat-dq7gh 4 роки тому

      Easiest way for finding velocities after collision...

  • @DJVN-fs1cr
    @DJVN-fs1cr 5 місяців тому

    You are the Best of all at explaining concepts for one to understand. May God Bless in abundance

  • @ab00d13
    @ab00d13 Рік тому +4

    For an easy short cut use this method:
    Vf1=(m1-m2/m1+m2)*V1
    Vf2=(2m1/m1+m2)*V1

  • @dappercoat249
    @dappercoat249 2 роки тому +1

    I’m currently in an 1 & 2 AP physics class for the fact that I won’t have to take a science next year if I pass. Thanks for helping me get through the struggle!

  • @Sergio-ik9co
    @Sergio-ik9co 6 років тому +344

    I should just take the L

    • @nordindelosreyes3473
      @nordindelosreyes3473 6 років тому +19

      same here. im failing science 20 sitting at 23%.

    • @SlowKlone
      @SlowKlone 5 років тому +3

      I'll join you as well

    • @tenkshadw7370
      @tenkshadw7370 5 років тому +11

      i wouldn't give up so soon, college is 1 million times worse... :(

    • @SlowKlone
      @SlowKlone 5 років тому +10

      @@tenkshadw7370 I am in college, I ended up getting an 80 on it so I'm happy

    • @rickyg.3111
      @rickyg.3111 5 років тому +6

      LMAO exactly once I said after he started doing the elimination part I was like tf is this shit I-

  • @solomonnawa7922
    @solomonnawa7922 3 роки тому +2

    honestly i think i love this man 😊😯

  • @mahdichowdhury4959
    @mahdichowdhury4959 2 роки тому +2

    Dude your a frckin life saver

  • @elijah1110
    @elijah1110 5 років тому +19

    I thought elastic collisions need to use the vf= (m1-2)/(m1+m2)*vo Formulas?

    • @calvin9388
      @calvin9388 3 роки тому

      that's also applicable

  • @legend7890
    @legend7890 5 років тому +2

    my professor did the same problem in very difficult way which I couldn't understand. But, after watching your video it feels like a piece of cake. Thank you very much

  • @s4k072
    @s4k072 Рік тому +1

    Will the eq 2 be the same if the equation
    e=-(Vaf-Vbf)/Vai-Vbi is used?

  • @roderickmcleod4864
    @roderickmcleod4864 Рік тому

    My prof would absolutely kill me if I used this method, but this is awesome, thank you.

  • @cindychilufya9220
    @cindychilufya9220 2 роки тому +1

    Thankyou 😭❤️, I used to get so puzzled by having two unknown velocities

  • @slopcrusher3482
    @slopcrusher3482 3 роки тому +2

    I wish I would have found you while I was doing my high school physics. I used Khan Academy, but I find how you teach better.

  • @shubhamdeshpande244
    @shubhamdeshpande244 4 роки тому +10

    I think that your channel name must be 'The Organic Science Tutor'

  • @kazuha.gnshnmpct
    @kazuha.gnshnmpct 10 місяців тому

    tq so much!! I've always stuck at the perfectly elastic collision parts

  • @shaheerhami1403
    @shaheerhami1403 4 роки тому +1

    Bro this is the only video that helped me thanks alot

  • @djinnzagan
    @djinnzagan 2 роки тому +1

    You really a big help. Sending you a lot of thanks 😘

  • @BaronLemon
    @BaronLemon 3 роки тому +1

    Hi. How would save in similar problem in which the first ball was accelerating (or decelerating)?

  • @oyayinkaferanmi2502
    @oyayinkaferanmi2502 3 роки тому +1

    Your a star teacher...💖

  • @skytowergnome4664
    @skytowergnome4664 3 роки тому +1

    By the time he got to the end I almost forgot the question! Many thanks though, my text book never covered what to do if one of the v's was missing.

  • @MasterMoonClap
    @MasterMoonClap Місяць тому

    This is a great use of algebra, and I will definitely be using this from now on. However, it doesn't seem to account for the units kg and p, which seem to be used as multipliers and place holders. Dividing kgms^-1 by ms^-1 wouldn't produce a velocity, it would produce a mass. Is there any way to use this method while also accounting for those units? Or am I making an error?

  • @aminahchimpinde9256
    @aminahchimpinde9256 6 років тому +3

    My tutor love from Zambia

  • @zouraizkhan2467
    @zouraizkhan2467 4 роки тому

    i didnt not know about the equation u1+v1=u2+v2 i think my teacher forgot to explain it or i wasnt focusing either way thank you. you learn a new thing every day

  • @AndrewWhise
    @AndrewWhise Рік тому +1

    So if I'm doing this in two dimensions, where the velocities are vectors, would I just do this twice? Once for the x velocities and once for the y velocities?

  • @epikk9
    @epikk9 2 роки тому +1

    I just started watching your videos recently and I really like how you explain stuff. Keep up the good work 🔥

  • @waheedshersher8217
    @waheedshersher8217 4 роки тому +2

    Thanks a lot for such an amazing video and examples. God bless you, after hours of searching this video made my assignment questions really easy.

  • @Bubblezzzzzzzz
    @Bubblezzzzzzzz 3 роки тому +1

    You, my good sir, are a gift from god

  • @user-ur9km8cc9d
    @user-ur9km8cc9d 4 роки тому +2

    thank you so much you put the avengers to shame bc its actually you saving the world !

  • @lolonimasibulele5437
    @lolonimasibulele5437 2 місяці тому +1

    You're the better 🎉🎉

  • @cinta5076
    @cinta5076 5 років тому +2

    thank you so much for this video🌸🌸

  • @chiragshah1488
    @chiragshah1488 Рік тому

    Correct me if I am wrong, but this equation v1f = v2i + v2f - v1i; only holds true when the mass of moving object is bigger than the object which is at rest.
    The generic one that works in all situations is
    v1'= [ (m1-m2) / (m1+m2)*v1 ] + [ 2*m2 / (m1+m2)*v2 ]
    v2'= [ 2*m2 / m1+m2*v1 ] + [ (m2-m1) / (m1+m2)*v2 ]

  • @xandersproduction5598
    @xandersproduction5598 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks so much. I have finally conquered this question 🥰

  • @reddylikhith1814
    @reddylikhith1814 3 роки тому

    A "thank you" is not at all enough for your help.....u really helped me

  • @tomato-sama3073
    @tomato-sama3073 4 роки тому

    5:08 can I use the substitution method?

  • @annabanda2049
    @annabanda2049 3 роки тому

    Thanks for making my studies easy😘God bless you

  • @GymCritical
    @GymCritical 4 роки тому +27

    You know what’s crazy, I really had a 100% in the class before this unit 😂😢😭

  • @ronywangira7174
    @ronywangira7174 6 років тому +3

    Thanks a lot for your videos they have been of help to me

  • @reggiecarolino1502
    @reggiecarolino1502 7 місяців тому

    Where does the "4" multiplier in (v1'+v2'=5 )(4) comes from?

  • @mchanc
    @mchanc 3 місяці тому

    thanks man🙏, really appreciate this

  • @fabricebache7956
    @fabricebache7956 2 роки тому

    Am impressed with your solving

  • @ivanhdz503
    @ivanhdz503 2 роки тому +1

    what a guy!! Thank you

  • @cain372
    @cain372 2 роки тому

    Awesome!
    6:01 Like Newton Law Gravitation.
    G= 6.67 * 10^-11

  • @LL-kn1de
    @LL-kn1de 6 років тому +5

    Thank you so much for these videos, they have been helped me a lot!

  • @TharukSeneviratne
    @TharukSeneviratne Рік тому

    do u have a video where u have done with the kinetic energy formula?

  • @JeSuisMrCraft
    @JeSuisMrCraft 2 роки тому

    Thanks mate. May God bless you.

  • @Sid_R
    @Sid_R 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks a lot! This has been beautifully helpful.

  • @amaretesfaw64
    @amaretesfaw64 2 роки тому

    I watch all ur videos and i like them all

  • @sydneyneidigh9381
    @sydneyneidigh9381 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much! I'm failing my college physics class and this is a huge help since I'm afraid to talk to people lol

    • @Manu-sk7qx
      @Manu-sk7qx 2 роки тому +2

      This is taught in college?!?!? I'm in 10th grade

    • @chrischin555
      @chrischin555 2 роки тому

      @@Manu-sk7qx if you're in college physics is more application based and explains concepts using
      if you take general physics (which is what is usually offered in high school if you don't take ap physics) it won't explain concepts w/ calculus since that's more geared towards engineers and physicists; it will be more concept-based

  • @olmusic7856
    @olmusic7856 Рік тому +1

    or u can find the 2 final velocities directly by this formulas:
    v1'= [ (m1-m2) / (m1+m2)*v1 ] + [ 2*m2 / (m1+m2)*v2 ]
    v2'= [ 2*m2 / m1+m2*v1 ] + [ (m2-m1) / (m1+m2)*v2 ]

  • @nicholasgalliano8541
    @nicholasgalliano8541 Рік тому

    Thanks for the explanation. You made the explanation easy to follow. I just have a question - if the initial angles of trajectory of the balls are different (i.e. the paths of travel converge to the point of impact) and they are both in motion, traveling at different velocities towards each other, how would this be calculated. I would imagine that you would calculate the x and y components separately. But I'm really not sure of the process...

  • @juniorwalker1989
    @juniorwalker1989 3 роки тому

    Please how do I become a member of this channel to get access to the membership videos. I can't find the join button. Please help me I need to access a video in the membership section. Thank you.

  • @chroma9848
    @chroma9848 6 років тому +1

    6:07 How do u know which equation u will substitute V2 into?

  • @py5522
    @py5522 3 роки тому

    sir you are a great teacher i want to meet you one day when iam a great student in physics

  • @johannesjohannes1842
    @johannesjohannes1842 2 роки тому

    Thanks so much these videos have helped me so much

  • @youtubewipes3397
    @youtubewipes3397 2 роки тому

    Brother you are god of physics even I learner many maths terms from your channel , i hate the books write the content

  • @chris132boss
    @chris132boss 5 років тому +1

    if anyone is interested, you should end up with these 2 equations:
    v2f = ((m1*v1i) - (m1*v2i) + P) / (m1 + m2);
    v1f = v2i + v2f - v1i;
    where P=total momentum before/after as it is assumed to be conserved.

  • @henewaaFelitia
    @henewaaFelitia Рік тому

    I really enjoyed the lesson

  • @AmeerulIslam
    @AmeerulIslam 5 років тому +3

    I have a concern, the first equation had a momentum which means it's Kgm/s and the second one was velocity m/s , how can you add/subtract the two. they are not simple constants right?

  • @enzolong9085
    @enzolong9085 6 років тому +2

    You really help me thank u

  • @rganaiktasl9482
    @rganaiktasl9482 3 роки тому

    Really helpful ❣💪

  • @johnnyboy6338
    @johnnyboy6338 3 роки тому

    2:03 “now you don’t want to use the equations for *kinetic energy* , it’d be a lot of *work* ”... I see what you did there

  • @nwachukwuanayofrancis9009
    @nwachukwuanayofrancis9009 3 роки тому +1

    please more complex examples. your examples are often too easy compare to my physics course. thanks,

    • @ablene_teklie
      @ablene_teklie 3 роки тому +3

      Same for me, but he is just giving a base for people who don't even know the simple ones (it includes me btw).

  • @tastypie2276
    @tastypie2276 3 роки тому +1

    I don't get one moment in collisions. Let's take the example from the video. 4kg ball moves towards the 2kg ball and touches it. 4kg ball exerts force on the second ball for some amount of time and the second also exerts force on the first (Newton's third law). During this, second ball will accelerate while the first is deaccelerating. At some moment they both will reach equal velocity. If they have equal velocities, they no longer exert force on each other. So, they will continue their motion with equal velocities.
    I would really appreciate if some kind person could help me to understand this or maybe could give me a link to a page where it is explained well.

  • @zenxyyy5209
    @zenxyyy5209 2 роки тому

    can someone explain to me in what class/grade do u learn these in the US?

  • @delciopereira9153
    @delciopereira9153 4 роки тому

    Good explanation teacher😉

  • @navarrojohnny4547
    @navarrojohnny4547 4 роки тому

    in the first example
    specifically the algebra part the constant in the first equation is MV
    while on the second equation is just V
    why did you use systems?

  • @jesusmrosario-claudio4104
    @jesusmrosario-claudio4104 4 роки тому

    Thank you once again.

  • @ruthmaquinto1102
    @ruthmaquinto1102 4 роки тому +1

    you're better than my physics teacher

  • @alifardanqureshi2969
    @alifardanqureshi2969 2 роки тому

    Can someone help me how to find one missing variable using the
    m1v1' + m2v2' equation
    Question: a 3kg object is moving at east direction at 5.0m/s. It strikes a 6.0 kg object moving at east 2.0m/s.Objects have one dimensional collision in the east-west direction. The velocity of the 3.0kg object after collision is?

  • @beverlyfrancis7692
    @beverlyfrancis7692 3 роки тому

    Thank you 😍

  • @seoulpeach5548
    @seoulpeach5548 4 роки тому +1

    thank you !!!

  • @josephmagaba378
    @josephmagaba378 3 роки тому

    I love you man!

  • @MohamedBuazza
    @MohamedBuazza Рік тому

    man thank you so much

  • @sashaspotato6167
    @sashaspotato6167 3 роки тому

    My teacher discussing this topic*
    My braincells: sleeps*/
    This dude in UA-cam
    My braincells: my time has come~

  • @kshitishp3662
    @kshitishp3662 4 роки тому

    You are my god sir 😭😭😭 I invented a new formula because of you sir thanks a lot ....we are proud to have you ..thank you for explaining everything with proofs very nicely ! U are Einstein and I'm minkowski..sir thanks again

  • @idowusamuelabel
    @idowusamuelabel 3 роки тому +1

    Nice 👌

  • @ravioli8520
    @ravioli8520 Рік тому

    what do i do when the moving ball at the beginning is lighter than the ball at rest?

  • @alexandersmerage4931
    @alexandersmerage4931 4 роки тому

    dear God this guy is fantastic

  • @ivanamoako-andoh8624
    @ivanamoako-andoh8624 5 років тому

    My textbook list a different equation, v1+v2=v1'+v2'. Do you know why that is? Please help.

    • @Jannat-dq7gh
      @Jannat-dq7gh 4 роки тому

      This velocities of ball before collision and velocities of balls after collision and formula is v1+v2=-v1'+v2'..

  • @FrankBreen
    @FrankBreen 3 роки тому

    Has anyone come up with equations for V1' = and v2' =?

  • @inshainsha3830
    @inshainsha3830 6 років тому +1

    Thank you!!

  • @rahulkumarkp503
    @rahulkumarkp503 2 роки тому

    Thank you tutor