The Night of January 19, 1595The Bloodiest Night in the History of the Ottoman

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 56

  • @Geooo._.
    @Geooo._. 3 місяці тому +63

    Sultan Suleyman Magnificent was legally married to Hasëki Hurrëm Sultan, therefore she wasn't just a concubine, she was his WIFE 😅😅

    • @honeststraightforward1485
      @honeststraightforward1485 2 місяці тому

      Seure. By doing so, Sultan Suleyman broke all the Islam and the Palace laws

    • @knowledgepath7688
      @knowledgepath7688  2 дні тому +1

      Thank you for your comment. Your note is correct. But she was a concubine before that.

    • @honeststraightforward1485
      @honeststraightforward1485 2 дні тому

      @Geooo._. Technically, Suleiman wasn't allowed to marry just one woman as it was, and it still part of the Muslim religion, coulter and especially law. However, no matter what status Hurrem did hold in the harem, in the end, she was justca concubine of the highest status. Nothing more, nothing less

    • @knowledgepath7688
      @knowledgepath7688  2 дні тому

      In Islam, a man is allowed to have up to four wives at the same time, provided that he is capable of treating them justly in terms of treatment, dowry, and financial support. This is based on the Quranic verse:
      "And if you fear that you will not be just to the orphans, then marry those that please you of [other] women, two or three or four. But if you fear that you will not be just, then [marry only] one." (An-Nisa: 3)
      If a man fears he cannot be just among the wives, it is preferable for him to marry only one.
      Conditions for Marrying More Than One:
      Ability to be Just: The man must be capable of achieving justice among the wives.
      Financial Capability: He must have the financial means to provide dowries and support for each wife.
      Sincerity and Intention: The marriage should be based on good intentions and in accordance with Islamic law.
      These rules aim to protect the rights of the wives and ensure a dignified life for them.

    • @honeststraightforward1485
      @honeststraightforward1485 2 дні тому

      @knowledgepath7688 But is not allowed to have to only marry one legally.

  • @einezcrespo2107
    @einezcrespo2107 3 місяці тому +41

    It's Nurbanu who is allegedly Cecilia Venier-Baffo not Safiye.

    • @knowledgepath7688
      @knowledgepath7688  3 місяці тому +3

      Thank you for your comment. You are correct

    • @olegovchinsky6177
      @olegovchinsky6177 3 місяці тому +8

      Nurbanu was Jewish and she also was legal wife of Selim II. Kosem was legal wife of Ahmed I. Hurrem, Nurbanu, Kosem married their Sultans, while Safiye, Turhan did not.

    • @CindyCowan-w7z
      @CindyCowan-w7z 2 місяці тому +1

      Nirbanu claimed kinship with Sophia baffo( safiye) not that she was Sophia baffo

    • @hasnainsadiqbrohi2697
      @hasnainsadiqbrohi2697 Місяць тому

      ​@@olegovchinsky6177 haha read history clearly. Safiye was legally married to Sultan Murad 3 and the marriage took place in 1586 some days before her daughter Ayse sultan's marriage which took place in may 1586. Their are many letters which confirms their marriage such as from Venetian Senate who sent her many gifts and congrats her for their marriage .

    • @hasnainsadiqbrohi2697
      @hasnainsadiqbrohi2697 Місяць тому

      ​@@olegovchinsky6177Nurbanu was Venetian and her name was Cecilia vanier baffo according to Emilio spagni and Franz babinger. This theory is more reliable because of the fact the she prevented the war between ottoman and venice. She even had very close political diplomatic contacts with venetians. So these reports suggest that Nurbanu never forgot her origin .

  • @margarettdesilier8424
    @margarettdesilier8424 Місяць тому +8

    All this is because of Suleyman's jealous hold on power. Had he allowed his more deserving sons to succeed him instead of the skewed Selim, many grievances and crimes could have been avoided.

    • @knowledgepath7688
      @knowledgepath7688  Місяць тому +1

      Thank you for your comment. So many historians agree with you said. All the best

  • @MammaKush88
    @MammaKush88 2 дні тому +1

    You better put some respecton Hurrems name

  • @deborahschultz3498
    @deborahschultz3498 2 місяці тому +4

    I don’t understand them have all those sons knowing all but one will be murdered.

  • @fiddleferme
    @fiddleferme 2 місяці тому +7

    Informative content....but the computer voice is not only annoying, but makes it painful to listen. Nice try. Get a better comp generated voice.

    • @knowledgepath7688
      @knowledgepath7688  2 місяці тому +2

      Thank you for your comment. I will try to improve the computer generated sound.

  • @fatycamro7216
    @fatycamro7216 7 днів тому

    Corrijanme si estoy mal, lo que entiendo en el video es que mencionan que Murad III mandó a 18 sirvientes para matar a sus hermanos (que tengo entendido eran 19), pero según tengo entendido no fue Murad III, fue su hijo Mehmet III el que cometió esa masacre el 27 de enero de 1595.

  • @Nina-l2l1e
    @Nina-l2l1e 2 місяці тому +8

    Execution of young princes after death of the sultan was accepted procedure in Ottoman imperium.

  • @danielmathai4780
    @danielmathai4780 3 місяці тому +10

    Safiye Sultan did what she had to protect her children......she knew that if someone else other than her son became the Sultan, her sons would be killed....As per the Ottoman rules of succession, all male children had equal right to the throne, irrespective of their mother's status...so once a reigning sultan reached his deathbed, it was a race against time for the mother's of the princes, to make sure that their sons were protected at all costs....
    Also, the system of "Kafes" was not started by Safiye, but by Ahmed I

    • @knowledgepath7688
      @knowledgepath7688  3 місяці тому +2

      Thank you for your valuable comment. You are correct. This is according to the Ottoman rules. All the best

    • @olegovchinsky6177
      @olegovchinsky6177 3 місяці тому

      mostly by Kosem Sultana

    • @anaghasudheep3095
      @anaghasudheep3095 3 місяці тому

      But he killed her own grandson maummed

    • @danielmathai4780
      @danielmathai4780 3 місяці тому

      @@anaghasudheep3095 she did not

    • @olegovchinsky6177
      @olegovchinsky6177 3 місяці тому +1

      @@anaghasudheep3095 she never killed her grandson and in real history never wanted to do it. Possibly Turhan, but not Mehmed

  • @Dramawitsvu17
    @Dramawitsvu17 24 дні тому +1

    This is ALL wrong. Safiya was given to Murad by Mihrimah Sultana’s daughter Ayşe Hümaşah Sultan.

  • @renateserenay2032
    @renateserenay2032 Місяць тому

    This video is totally inaccurate 🥴🥴🥴 why don't u delete this video and upload one with the correct info?????😟😟😟

  • @souliotisnr1
    @souliotisnr1 2 місяці тому +7

    There was not a city with the name Istanbul 1595
    1930 was the name changed into Istanbul...

    • @knowledgepath7688
      @knowledgepath7688  2 місяці тому +1

      Thank you for your comment. To my knowledge, Istanbul was named at the year 1453

    • @souliotisnr1
      @souliotisnr1 2 місяці тому

      @@knowledgepath7688 your knowledge is wrong.

    • @knowledgepath7688
      @knowledgepath7688  2 місяці тому

      @@souliotisnr1 All the information are based on solid Turkish and European references

    • @knowledgepath7688
      @knowledgepath7688  2 місяці тому

      All the information are based on solid Turkish and European references

    • @souliotisnr1
      @souliotisnr1 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@knowledgepath7688
      1930
      It was only in 1930, after the formation of the Republic of Turkey that the city's name was officially changed to the Turkish name İstanbul. Tracing the country back to its Greek history, the word İstanbul originates in the Greek phrase “στην Πόλι” (stim poli) meaning “in the city”.28.03.2023
      I am correct. Don't spread fake data!

  • @darlenefutrell6339
    @darlenefutrell6339 2 місяці тому +7

    That's why the Ottoman fell women hungry for power and money!

    • @aha3652
      @aha3652 2 місяці тому

      Ottoman Empire fell because of other factors not just women classic 0 IQ monkey

  • @MRUMABDLEA
    @MRUMABDLEA 3 місяці тому +1

    ❤❤❤❤❤

  • @ashlyirvyn2917
    @ashlyirvyn2917 3 місяці тому +7

    Dukadjins were not of Shqiptarete, aka Albanian origin. Ducadjins were Serbs, not Shqiptarete, aka Albanian. People, please look for more facts and information, especially in genetics of the Balkan peoples. Ducadjins' tribe was located in Kosovo and Metohija, not in Albania. Ducadjins were not Shqiptarete, but Serbs. Alexsandar Ducadjin was Serb, not Shqiptar. It was the area where Serbs lived, not Shqiptarete. Shqiptaret, aka Albanians, belong to Byzantins implants of Greeks from South Italy and Sycily all over the Balkan, including today Albania. DNA lab. My Heritage Greeks by 89% and Shqiptarete aka Albanians 83% are grouped in Greek and South Italien ethnicity. Albanians are not Balkan natives. They are Greeks from South Italy. Serbs are grouped by genetic facts and autosomal DNA in Balkan ethnicity. Alexander Leka Dukadjin was Serbs' Noble man. He joined Serbs Christians' army in the Battle of Kosovo in 28.06.1389

    • @knowledgepath7688
      @knowledgepath7688  3 місяці тому +1

      Thank you for your comment. I will take into consideration all what brought your letter. All the best

    • @Dona17
      @Dona17 3 місяці тому +3

      Jesus Christ was also a serb, God is a Serb too
      😂😂 are you kidding us dude.

    • @olegovchinsky6177
      @olegovchinsky6177 3 місяці тому +2

      @@Dona17 Jesus was ours, Jewish. And G-d too.

    • @benetbani5594
      @benetbani5594 2 місяці тому

      ​@@knowledgepath7688totally wrong explanation, please check carefully. These internet lunatics are treating history like a hobby, questioning everything about a nation.

    • @benetbani5594
      @benetbani5594 2 місяці тому +1

      You are simply wrong on everything you say. They have tried to make albanians with caucasian origin, with north african origin and today I hear this idiotic thesis of yours. All of this while you do not see the only credible version which is widely accepted: the continuity between illyrian, Arberia, and Albania.