How Do We Annihilate A-B-O-R-T-I-O-N Arguments?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 чер 2024
- ✅ Discover the answers to some of the biggest questions about the Bible and Christian faith with The Complete Bible Answer Book. This comprehensive guide by Hank Hanegraaff, aka the Bible Answer Man, tackles more than 210 questions that have puzzled believers for decades. Get your copy here: amzn.to/4auSg0T
Hank Hanegraaff, the host of the 𝘉𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘈𝘯𝘴𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘔𝘢𝘯 broadcast and the 𝘏𝘢𝘯𝘬 𝘜𝘯𝘱𝘭𝘶𝘨𝘨𝘦𝘥 podcast, talks about how we annihilate A-B-O-R-T-I-O-N arguments?
Abortion is the painful killing of an innocent human being. Painful for the child because the methods employed involve burning, smothering, dismembering, and crushing. Killing in that, from the beginning, that which is terminated fulfills the criteria necessary for establishing the existence of biological life, including metabolism, development, the ability to react to stimuli, and cell reproduction. Innocent in that a preborn child deserves protection rather than capital punishment. A human being in that the child who is killed is the offspring of human parents and has a totally distinct genetic code. Since abortion is nothing short of terminating the life of a person created in the image of God, I’ve developed the acronym A-B-O-R-T-I-O-N as a memorable tool by which to annihilate pro-abortion arguments.
-------------------------------------------------
Connect with the Christian Research Institute (CRI):
🔴 Subscribe to our channel: ua-cam.com/users/CRInstit...
🔴 Subscribe to the Bible Answer Man on Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
✔️ Subscribe to “Hank Unplugged” on Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
✔️ Subscribe to our magazine the Cʜʀɪsᴛɪᴀɴ Rᴇsᴇᴀʀᴄʜ Jᴏᴜʀɴᴀʟ's weekly podcast www.spreaker.com/show/postmod...
📒 Visit CRI’s website: www.equip.org/
✅ Listen to the Bible Answer Man broadcast live streaming Monday through Friday from 6-6:30 PM ET online at www.equip.org/
#bibleanswerman #prolife #christianity
Agree Hank . The argument needs two answers . How do we first change Christians mind about voting for abortion even when they say they don’t personally support it . I’m talking about Christian democrats. Then the argument to the non believers
@dallasbrat81 Thanks for sharing. 👍
Whenever UA-cam puts an abortion sticker on a video, you can rest assured the content ( if it's from a Christian) is absolutely 💯 True...
@oreally8605 Keen observation.
Define a human.
Is a person considered a person because of the sum of all there parts?
How many parts are necessary for a person to be or not be human?
What stage of life determines whether a person is a human?
Conception=person
46 chromosomes(potential)=person(actual)
Potential=Actual
Define an apple tree
Is an apple tree a non-apple tree when it does not have apples?
When is an apple tree an apple tree?
What stage?
Fertilized Seed(potential)=Apple Tree(Actual)
There is more to it than the parts. Even people who are missing parts (either from birth or tragedy) they still have intrinsic worth by virtue of being bearers of the imago Dei. See www.equip.org/articles/the-human-embryo-potential-person-or-person-with-great-potential/
@@BibleAnswerMan I agree but I am approaching it from a naturalistic perspective. Those who believe in abortion predicate their belief in abortion based on stages of growth or how many parts a thing has. What I am trying to demonstrate is you can't do that. We as humans go through stages of growth up into the point of death and actually, even after death. Choosing whether something is or not based on stages of growth or parts is arbitrary. Why? Because out of the womb or in the womb a human is in constant change. Humans dehumanize humans because of parts and stages of growth. I'm trying to demonstrate the (potential=actual) are the same. Just because a pear tree doesn't have pears until its adulthood does not mean it's not a pear tree. Does a tree stop being a tree when it loses its leaves? What constitutes a tree? A pear tree is a pear tree at conception as humans are human at conception. You can't define a human based on stages and parts because humans change. Parts and being cognitive can be lost before birth and after birth. They are one and the same. Stages of growth are before birth and after birth. Because of time, we think things are less than what it is supposed to be because of the stage in which the thing is. I'm arguing that a thing is the same from the beginning to the end. After an egg is fertilized, 46 chromosomes appear in which the human has the potential to have the actual. The human at conception has all the code necessary to produce the parts it needs in the womb and out of the womb.
(((Time does not exist))) Time is the stumbling block. We were timeless before birth. Because we constitute a body, we see things in stages. Christ was crucified from the foundation of the world. The beginning is the end and end is the beginning. That which was, is that which will be.
@@BibleAnswerMan I agree
@@BibleAnswerMan
Potential=Actual
Potential-is a fertilized egg with 46 chromosome
Actual-is a human with some of its parts or all of its parts. Cognitive or non-cognitive.
A human is not the sum of all its parts. A fertilized egg with 46 chromosomes has the potential to actualize.
46 Chromosomes=human
The process after the fertilized egg and before the point of birth is what abortionist quarrel over.
Those who believe in abortion don't realize stages in a process does not determine whether a human is human. A person is in constant change whether in the womb or out of the womb. A person can be cognitive in the womb or out of the womb. A person can be missing parts in the womb and out of the womb. The DNA code is one and the same with the actualized person. When persons observe the process of growth from one stage to another, they by nature create a hierarchy, not realizing growth is continuous up into the point of death and even after. At conception, a fertilized egg has all the necessary code to produce the necessary parts.
The beginning is the end and end is the beginning. They are one in the same. Christ, our Savior died from the foundation of the world though it had not be actualized until 30AD.
Don't agree with abortion, don't have one. Simple as that. Leave everyone else to make their own decisions.
@mikebufalry8824 Well that's flawed as ever. Don't agree with pedophile priest, don't become a pedophile priest. Leave every other pedophile priest to make his own decisions.
No.
"Don't approve of slavery, dont own a slave. To each, their own..."
Don't forget a 1000 years comes first before the new heavens and new earth
@Marsman-zh1hr That's one way of looking at things. See www.equip.org/bible_answers/what-about-the-millennium/
In Numbers 5, if a husband suspects that his wife may have had relations with another man (verses 12-13), the husband can bring the wife to the priest to undergo a ritual. If she is found innocent, she will continue to be able to give birth (verse 28) with the implication that if she were guilty she would not be able to give birth. Verse 27 tells us the way she is made unable to give birth: by way of bodily changes. Now, if she had had relations with another man and she had become pregnant by this other man, then does the existing baby survive the bodily changes in verse 27 intended to make the woman unable to give birth? The NIV doesn't think so. Christians are hypocrites.
@ConservativeMirror You are missing the point of Numbers 5. The test for adultery was to shame a jealous husband for false accusing his wife of an indiscretion.
@@BibleAnswerMan What? You are twisting the scripture here. If she was guilty, she'd lose the child (God would be the one performing the abortion) and she'd be sterile the rest of her life.
Have you even read these scriptures?
And, more, it's a magical spell, the priest puts dirt from the floor and then scraps the ink of the curse/blessing into the bowl, so she drinks this potion to determine her guilt or innocence.
Another thing you Christians ignore: Where is the test for an unfaithful husband? lol