Vozio sam A4 3.0 i trebao sam da ga kupim prosle godine ali omaklo se Inace bi dobio isti auto,sa istom opremom i sve a zelio sam nesto drugacije,smorilo me jer sam u jednom enterijeru presap 80 000 km....plus a4 3.0 nece niko da kupi dok a6 ide lagano
Audi A6 4F 2.0 TDi PD 103 KW, motor kao motor izvrstan, no medjutim sve okolo motora je za onu stvar... mana uljna pumpa koju sam dva puta mjenjao skupa sa pogonskon osovinom pumpe u razmaku od godine dana i 23 000 km prijedjenih, turbine su jako osjetljive na pad pritiska ulja u slucaju kvara pumpe ulja, klapne od motorica grijanja takodjer gdje auto u srednjoj zoni hladi cak i kada je grijanje do kraja pojacano, ovjes ne moram ni spominat, limarija jako nekvalitetna, problemi sa zadnjim stopovima prilikom ulaska vode u vrata od bunkera, ukratko 2 godine voznje i prijedjenih 43 000 km , ulozeno ravno 5000€ u auto. Auto sada ima trenutno 257 000 originalnih kilometara i sve je promjenjeno osim motora i rucnog mjenjaca, te je razmisljanje o prodaji 🙄
@aluminijska ramena na ovjesu komplet 700€, uljna pumpa 140€ , ulje i filter ulja 70€, motorici od el rucne 80€ , celjusti kocnica 140€ , set zupcastog 180€ set kvacila 300€ do 400€ , turbina nova 850€ , senzor temperature na dpfu 130€ , dpf filter 400€ , senzori esp 46€ sva 4 , adaptivni ksenon koji odlazi zbog kratkog spoja zica farovi po komadu od 200€ do 300€ , i sigurno jos po nesto sam izostavio ali ovo je u globalu sve bio moj slucaj a majstoru ruke nisam uracuno koje su od 100€ pa sve do 900€ ovisno o kvaru ili koliko se stvari nakupi odjednom
Da jesam Pa iskreno ima,kao prvo izolacija je bolja,prostora ima masu vise a takodje sa nekim sitnicama su ostvarili da bude idealan za put ( lufteri za vazduh na studovima,na centralnom tunelu,naslon za ruku sa 2 drzaca za case,dzepove u vratima i sjedistima,pepeljare u vratima....)
Veoma smo slicni. Ja takodje nedavno prodah passata 6icu 2.0tdi sa zeljom za vise snage iako me passat odlicno sluzio i bio je sasvim dovoljan. Passat otisao za 4.800€ i kupih upravo a6 c6 3.0tdi 176kw Tiptronic 2010. Morao sam izdvojiti punih 9.000€. Prvo sto sam napravio je servis mjenjaca i motora, nova kociona tecnost, ulje u oba diferencijala, svi filteri. Auto vuce ko lud. Ima dosta prostora za modifikacije od skidanja dpfa, egra, klapni, cipovanja, izduv. Pa zivo me zanima sta ti planiras da mu "napakujes"? Pozdrav
Uuh,tvoj je Facelift,prava prica...ja bih tog 3.0 jos chip na 280-290ks i imas raketu Bice na kanalu sve sto budem radio tako da cu izbaciti a mozes mi se javiti i na Instagram,balkan__auto Pozz
"razocaran u 2.0 TDI"- je neadekvatan naslov Ja ne razumem kupovinu 2.7 tdi ( narocito u B7 recimo), jedva jaci od 2.0 tdi a servisi kostaju kao 3.0 tdi, Vecina dolaze sa FWD i multitronix menjac koji je CVT. Sa 3.0 tdi dobjes quattro, pouzdani automatik,, snaga za malo vece potrosnje ~0.5L. Najbolji su one iz 2015 godine kada su otklonute neke vece probleme. 3 generacija 3.0 tdi ne valja (nakon 2017). differentcarreview ima dobar i detaljan post oko sve probleme. Timing chains-vibracije pocinju oko 200k km, kada pocnu-zemjenis ili vozis jos 50k km ali reskiras da ostetis motor. Posao je skup 1200-3000 eura. Kupovinom 2.0 tdi Common rail koji je bio odrzavan i naravno nastavis tako dobijas najbolje iz oba svjeta. Snaga dovoljna, servisi jeftini, potrosnja zanemarljiva. Imam krug ljudi oko sebi koji imaju 2.0 tdi i zlostavljaju ga svaki dan, motor pouzdan, prosto ide. Smatram da NIJE zasluzio takav naslov.
Za 6-7k ne mozes da kupiš cr motor i to je to...Naslov je da privuce paznju,vozio sam B7 2.5 godine i presao 80 000km i pritom prodao ga sa 400 000km na satu i sluzio me SAVRSENO ! Ako me A6 bude 50% sluzio kao B7,bicu prezadovoljan Zelio sam promjenu i ispao mi je provjeren A6 i to je to,znam da ne ide wow ali ide sasvim okej...220 ks za ovu karoseriju nije top ali nije ni lose
@@johngotti7429uopce i ne gubi vremena, evo ti sta ti je chatgpt plus rekao, uklapa mi se sa satima provedenih po foruma, sajtova koji rade review i iskustva koje smo imali. Ne interesuju me izolirane pojedine slucaje. Chatgpt plus o komentara: This comment makes valid points, but the accuracy depends on the specific circumstances and priorities of the buyer. Here’s a breakdown of the main claims in the comment: 1. 2.7 TDI vs. 2.0 TDI Performance: The 2.7 TDI offers slightly more power and torque than the 2.0 TDI, but not significantly enough to justify the added complexity and costs for some users. It’s considered a "middle-ground" engine between the 2.0 TDI and 3.0 TDI but often doesn’t shine in either performance or cost-effectiveness. Maintenance Costs: The 2.7 TDI's servicing costs are indeed closer to the 3.0 TDI because of its V6 configuration, which involves more expensive components and maintenance than the simpler inline-4 of the 2.0 TDI. Timing chain issues and other maintenance concerns make the 2.7 TDI less attractive for those prioritizing low running costs. 2. 3.0 TDI Advantages The commenter highlights that the 3.0 TDI generally comes with quattro and a reliable automatic gearbox (like the ZF 8-speed in later models), which makes it a more robust and versatile choice. The fuel consumption difference between the 2.7 and 3.0 TDI is negligible (~0.5L/100km in real-world conditions), which makes the 3.0 a better choice for many. The note about 2015 models is accurate. Post-2015, many issues with the 3.0 TDI (e.g., timing chain vibrations) were resolved. 3. 2.0 TDI Common Rail (CR) The commenter prefers the 2.0 TDI CR because it strikes a balance between cost, reliability, and performance. Compared to the 2.7 TDI, it’s simpler, cheaper to maintain, and still powerful enough for daily use. The reliability of the 2.0 TDI CR engines (e.g., CFFB, CGLC) is well-documented if they are properly maintained. They’re less complex than the V6s and have fewer issues like timing chain wear or gearbox failures. 4. Multitronic CVT in 2.7 TDI The Multitronic CVT gearbox, often paired with front-wheel-drive 2.7 TDIs, is notorious for being less reliable and expensive to repair. This is a genuine concern for buyers and one reason to avoid this configuration. Summary The commenter’s argument is valid for someone prioritizing reliability and cost-effectiveness. For most practical buyers: A well-maintained 2.0 TDI CR is a great choice for its balance of economy and reliability. If quattro and more power are desired, the 3.0 TDI is generally a better choice than the 2.7 TDI, especially if you can find a post-2015 model. The 2.7 TDI, while a reasonable engine, doesn't provide a significant enough advantage in performance to outweigh its higher maintenance costs and the potential drawbacks of the CVT gearbox. The comment’s criticism of the video title seems fair if the seller had issues with the older 2.0 TDI (likely a PD engine), as this doesn't apply to the newer common-rail variants. Pozdrav i tebi
@@johngotti7429 Pozdrav brate ali me ne interesiraju izolirana pojedina iskustva. Statistika je statistika, jedna i univerzalna. Evo sta ti je ChatGPT Plus rekao o komentaru, sasvim se uklapa sa iskustvom koje smo imali i sate provedene po forumima i sajtove koje rade review. Chatgpt: This comment makes valid points, but the accuracy depends on the specific circumstances and priorities of the buyer. Here’s a breakdown of the main claims in the comment: 1. 2.7 TDI vs. 2.0 TDI Performance: The 2.7 TDI offers slightly more power and torque than the 2.0 TDI, but not significantly enough to justify the added complexity and costs for some users. It’s considered a "middle-ground" engine between the 2.0 TDI and 3.0 TDI but often doesn’t shine in either performance or cost-effectiveness. Maintenance Costs: The 2.7 TDI's servicing costs are indeed closer to the 3.0 TDI because of its V6 configuration, which involves more expensive components and maintenance than the simpler inline-4 of the 2.0 TDI. Timing chain issues and other maintenance concerns make the 2.7 TDI less attractive for those prioritizing low running costs. 2. 3.0 TDI Advantages The commenter highlights that the 3.0 TDI generally comes with quattro and a reliable automatic gearbox (like the ZF 8-speed in later models), which makes it a more robust and versatile choice. The fuel consumption difference between the 2.7 and 3.0 TDI is negligible (~0.5L/100km in real-world conditions), which makes the 3.0 a better choice for many. The note about 2015 models is accurate. Post-2015, many issues with the 3.0 TDI (e.g., timing chain vibrations) were resolved. 3. 2.0 TDI Common Rail (CR) The commenter prefers the 2.0 TDI CR because it strikes a balance between cost, reliability, and performance. Compared to the 2.7 TDI, it’s simpler, cheaper to maintain, and still powerful enough for daily use. The reliability of the 2.0 TDI CR engines (e.g., CFFB, CGLC) is well-documented if they are properly maintained. They’re less complex than the V6s and have fewer issues like timing chain wear or gearbox failures. 4. Multitronic CVT in 2.7 TDI The Multitronic CVT gearbox, often paired with front-wheel-drive 2.7 TDIs, is notorious for being less reliable and expensive to repair. This is a genuine concern for buyers and one reason to avoid this configuration. Summary The commenter’s argument is valid for someone prioritizing reliability and cost-effectiveness. For most practical buyers: A well-maintained 2.0 TDI CR is a great choice for its balance of economy and reliability. If quattro and more power are desired, the 3.0 TDI is generally a better choice than the 2.7 TDI, especially if you can find a post-2015 model. The 2.7 TDI, while a reasonable engine, doesn't provide a significant enough advantage in performance to outweigh its higher maintenance costs and the potential drawbacks of the CVT gearbox. The comment’s criticism of the video title seems fair if the seller had issues with the older 2.0 TDI (likely a PD engine), as this doesn't apply to the newer common-rail variants.
Cuo sam brate da 2.7 motor nije najbolji. Moj rođak ima audija a6 2.0 tdi 140 hp i kad ga je kupovo vecina majstora mu je govorila da je 2.7 los motor ,pa sad neznam kakav je taj.
Pretplatite se na kanal ! Idemo do 13 000 subscribera
Nek ti srecan bude
Hvalaa Matej
Bravo Nidzo,jel si video A4 B9 2.0 150KS,bas je mocan auto unutra ali gledaj 2017 godiste !
Cestitam Nikola!
Hvala Lazare
Nikola giganteee
😆
Ovo je ipak klasa za A4
Veca klasa ali je A4 sa istim motorom mnogo brzi i zabavniji za voznju.
Vozio sam A4 3.0 i trebao sam da ga kupim prosle godine ali omaklo se
Inace bi dobio isti auto,sa istom opremom i sve a zelio sam nesto drugacije,smorilo me jer sam u jednom enterijeru presap 80 000 km....plus a4 3.0 nece niko da kupi dok a6 ide lagano
@@Balkanautoo2014 a4 3.0 kod mene bruka auto, može se prodati isto kao a6
Klasa iznad
Tacno 😊
Audi A6 4F 2.0 TDi PD 103 KW, motor kao motor izvrstan, no medjutim sve okolo motora je za onu stvar... mana uljna pumpa koju sam dva puta mjenjao skupa sa pogonskon osovinom pumpe u razmaku od godine dana i 23 000 km prijedjenih, turbine su jako osjetljive na pad pritiska ulja u slucaju kvara pumpe ulja, klapne od motorica grijanja takodjer gdje auto u srednjoj zoni hladi cak i kada je grijanje do kraja pojacano, ovjes ne moram ni spominat, limarija jako nekvalitetna, problemi sa zadnjim stopovima prilikom ulaska vode u vrata od bunkera, ukratko 2 godine voznje i prijedjenih 43 000 km , ulozeno ravno 5000€ u auto. Auto sada ima trenutno 257 000 originalnih kilometara i sve je promjenjeno osim motora i rucnog mjenjaca, te je razmisljanje o prodaji 🙄
Koliko koštaju delovi pojedinačno?
@aluminijska ramena na ovjesu komplet 700€, uljna pumpa 140€ , ulje i filter ulja 70€, motorici od el rucne 80€ , celjusti kocnica 140€ , set zupcastog 180€ set kvacila 300€ do 400€ , turbina nova 850€ , senzor temperature na dpfu 130€ , dpf filter 400€ , senzori esp 46€ sva 4 , adaptivni ksenon koji odlazi zbog kratkog spoja zica farovi po komadu od 200€ do 300€ , i sigurno jos po nesto sam izostavio ali ovo je u globalu sve bio moj slucaj a majstoru ruke nisam uracuno koje su od 100€ pa sve do 900€ ovisno o kvaru ili koliko se stvari nakupi odjednom
Nije djabe rekao borko najbolje auto je za kupovinu od 400000km jer tu je sve menjano na vreme ovi od 200000 su sumljivi uvek.
😂😂😂
800k jos bolje 😂
Sumnjivi*
Dobar autoo ali ja sma fan mercedesa sta kazes brate na w211 4matic 320cdi
Hvala puno,W211 top auto,samo ganjati Avantgarde i to je to
Da li si išao sa A6 na neka duža putovanja (npr. 3-4h)? Da li ima neke veće razlike u komforu od A4 B7?
Da jesam
Pa iskreno ima,kao prvo izolacija je bolja,prostora ima masu vise a takodje sa nekim sitnicama su ostvarili da bude idealan za put ( lufteri za vazduh na studovima,na centralnom tunelu,naslon za ruku sa 2 drzaca za case,dzepove u vratima i sjedistima,pepeljare u vratima....)
Veoma smo slicni. Ja takodje nedavno prodah passata 6icu 2.0tdi sa zeljom za vise snage iako me passat odlicno sluzio i bio je sasvim dovoljan. Passat otisao za 4.800€ i kupih upravo a6 c6 3.0tdi 176kw Tiptronic 2010. Morao sam izdvojiti punih 9.000€. Prvo sto sam napravio je servis mjenjaca i motora, nova kociona tecnost, ulje u oba diferencijala, svi filteri. Auto vuce ko lud. Ima dosta prostora za modifikacije od skidanja dpfa, egra, klapni, cipovanja, izduv. Pa zivo me zanima sta ti planiras da mu "napakujes"? Pozdrav
Uuh,tvoj je Facelift,prava prica...ja bih tog 3.0 jos chip na 280-290ks i imas raketu
Bice na kanalu sve sto budem radio tako da cu izbaciti a mozes mi se javiti i na Instagram,balkan__auto
Pozz
Rispekt
🫡
Inace, ovaj 2.7 tdi ne moze vise od 238 prednji pogon, dok chipovan ide 265. 3.0 tdi je mnogo zesci pa iako je tezak ide bolje nego E60 530d.
za njega 3.0 i bog da te vidi
Mogao si da nadjes neku A4 05-06 3.0tdi ako si hteo zestinu
I dobijam isti auto sa istom opremom koje cu posle duplo teze da prodam nego A6
"razocaran u 2.0 TDI"- je neadekvatan naslov
Ja ne razumem kupovinu 2.7 tdi ( narocito u B7 recimo), jedva jaci od 2.0 tdi a servisi kostaju kao 3.0 tdi, Vecina dolaze sa FWD i multitronix menjac koji je CVT.
Sa 3.0 tdi dobjes quattro, pouzdani automatik,, snaga za malo vece potrosnje ~0.5L. Najbolji su one iz 2015 godine kada su otklonute neke vece probleme. 3 generacija 3.0 tdi ne valja (nakon 2017). differentcarreview ima dobar i detaljan post oko sve probleme. Timing chains-vibracije pocinju oko 200k km, kada pocnu-zemjenis ili vozis jos 50k km ali reskiras da ostetis motor. Posao je skup 1200-3000 eura.
Kupovinom 2.0 tdi Common rail koji je bio odrzavan i naravno nastavis tako dobijas najbolje iz oba svjeta. Snaga dovoljna, servisi jeftini, potrosnja zanemarljiva. Imam krug ljudi oko sebi koji imaju 2.0 tdi i zlostavljaju ga svaki dan, motor pouzdan, prosto ide. Smatram da NIJE zasluzio takav naslov.
Pola od toga nije tacno sto si rekao i nisi u pravu. A mogao bi do sutra pisat zbog cega. Lijep pozdrav
Za 6-7k ne mozes da kupiš cr motor i to je to...Naslov je da privuce paznju,vozio sam B7 2.5 godine i presao 80 000km i pritom prodao ga sa 400 000km na satu i sluzio me SAVRSENO !
Ako me A6 bude 50% sluzio kao B7,bicu prezadovoljan
Zelio sam promjenu i ispao mi je provjeren A6 i to je to,znam da ne ide wow ali ide sasvim okej...220 ks za ovu karoseriju nije top ali nije ni lose
@@johngotti7429uopce i ne gubi vremena, evo ti sta ti je chatgpt plus rekao, uklapa mi se sa satima provedenih po foruma, sajtova koji rade review i iskustva koje smo imali. Ne interesuju me izolirane pojedine slucaje. Chatgpt plus o komentara: This comment makes valid points, but the accuracy depends on the specific circumstances and priorities of the buyer. Here’s a breakdown of the main claims in the comment:
1. 2.7 TDI vs. 2.0 TDI
Performance:
The 2.7 TDI offers slightly more power and torque than the 2.0 TDI, but not significantly enough to justify the added complexity and costs for some users. It’s considered a "middle-ground" engine between the 2.0 TDI and 3.0 TDI but often doesn’t shine in either performance or cost-effectiveness.
Maintenance Costs:
The 2.7 TDI's servicing costs are indeed closer to the 3.0 TDI because of its V6 configuration, which involves more expensive components and maintenance than the simpler inline-4 of the 2.0 TDI. Timing chain issues and other maintenance concerns make the 2.7 TDI less attractive for those prioritizing low running costs.
2. 3.0 TDI Advantages
The commenter highlights that the 3.0 TDI generally comes with quattro and a reliable automatic gearbox (like the ZF 8-speed in later models), which makes it a more robust and versatile choice.
The fuel consumption difference between the 2.7 and 3.0 TDI is negligible (~0.5L/100km in real-world conditions), which makes the 3.0 a better choice for many.
The note about 2015 models is accurate. Post-2015, many issues with the 3.0 TDI (e.g., timing chain vibrations) were resolved.
3. 2.0 TDI Common Rail (CR)
The commenter prefers the 2.0 TDI CR because it strikes a balance between cost, reliability, and performance. Compared to the 2.7 TDI, it’s simpler, cheaper to maintain, and still powerful enough for daily use.
The reliability of the 2.0 TDI CR engines (e.g., CFFB, CGLC) is well-documented if they are properly maintained. They’re less complex than the V6s and have fewer issues like timing chain wear or gearbox failures.
4. Multitronic CVT in 2.7 TDI
The Multitronic CVT gearbox, often paired with front-wheel-drive 2.7 TDIs, is notorious for being less reliable and expensive to repair. This is a genuine concern for buyers and one reason to avoid this configuration.
Summary
The commenter’s argument is valid for someone prioritizing reliability and cost-effectiveness. For most practical buyers:
A well-maintained 2.0 TDI CR is a great choice for its balance of economy and reliability.
If quattro and more power are desired, the 3.0 TDI is generally a better choice than the 2.7 TDI, especially if you can find a post-2015 model.
The 2.7 TDI, while a reasonable engine, doesn't provide a significant enough advantage in performance to outweigh its higher maintenance costs and the potential drawbacks of the CVT gearbox.
The comment’s criticism of the video title seems fair if the seller had issues with the older 2.0 TDI (likely a PD engine), as this doesn't apply to the newer common-rail variants.
Pozdrav i tebi
@@johngotti7429 Pozdrav brate ali me ne interesiraju izolirana pojedina iskustva. Statistika je statistika, jedna i univerzalna. Evo sta ti je ChatGPT Plus rekao o komentaru, sasvim se uklapa sa iskustvom koje smo imali i sate provedene po forumima i sajtove koje rade review.
Chatgpt: This comment makes valid points, but the accuracy depends on the specific circumstances and priorities of the buyer. Here’s a breakdown of the main claims in the comment:
1. 2.7 TDI vs. 2.0 TDI
Performance:
The 2.7 TDI offers slightly more power and torque than the 2.0 TDI, but not significantly enough to justify the added complexity and costs for some users. It’s considered a "middle-ground" engine between the 2.0 TDI and 3.0 TDI but often doesn’t shine in either performance or cost-effectiveness.
Maintenance Costs:
The 2.7 TDI's servicing costs are indeed closer to the 3.0 TDI because of its V6 configuration, which involves more expensive components and maintenance than the simpler inline-4 of the 2.0 TDI. Timing chain issues and other maintenance concerns make the 2.7 TDI less attractive for those prioritizing low running costs.
2. 3.0 TDI Advantages
The commenter highlights that the 3.0 TDI generally comes with quattro and a reliable automatic gearbox (like the ZF 8-speed in later models), which makes it a more robust and versatile choice.
The fuel consumption difference between the 2.7 and 3.0 TDI is negligible (~0.5L/100km in real-world conditions), which makes the 3.0 a better choice for many.
The note about 2015 models is accurate. Post-2015, many issues with the 3.0 TDI (e.g., timing chain vibrations) were resolved.
3. 2.0 TDI Common Rail (CR)
The commenter prefers the 2.0 TDI CR because it strikes a balance between cost, reliability, and performance. Compared to the 2.7 TDI, it’s simpler, cheaper to maintain, and still powerful enough for daily use.
The reliability of the 2.0 TDI CR engines (e.g., CFFB, CGLC) is well-documented if they are properly maintained. They’re less complex than the V6s and have fewer issues like timing chain wear or gearbox failures.
4. Multitronic CVT in 2.7 TDI
The Multitronic CVT gearbox, often paired with front-wheel-drive 2.7 TDIs, is notorious for being less reliable and expensive to repair. This is a genuine concern for buyers and one reason to avoid this configuration.
Summary
The commenter’s argument is valid for someone prioritizing reliability and cost-effectiveness. For most practical buyers:
A well-maintained 2.0 TDI CR is a great choice for its balance of economy and reliability.
If quattro and more power are desired, the 3.0 TDI is generally a better choice than the 2.7 TDI, especially if you can find a post-2015 model.
The 2.7 TDI, while a reasonable engine, doesn't provide a significant enough advantage in performance to outweigh its higher maintenance costs and the potential drawbacks of the CVT gearbox.
The comment’s criticism of the video title seems fair if the seller had issues with the older 2.0 TDI (likely a PD engine), as this doesn't apply to the newer common-rail variants.
@@Balkanautoo Ma nek ti je sa srecom brate, apsolutno je dovoljan, nek te dobro sluzi i zelim ti puno lepih momenata provedenih snjim :)
Ne zivim u Crnoj Gori vec 3-4 godine ali jel realno da auto staro 18 godina i 400h km (a moguce i vise) neko plati 6000 eura?
Cuo sam brate da 2.7 motor nije najbolji. Moj rođak ima audija a6 2.0 tdi 140 hp i kad ga je kupovo vecina majstora mu je govorila da je 2.7 los motor ,pa sad neznam kakav je taj.
Zašto je 2.7 loš? Sličan je kao i 3.0 koji je odličan motor. Ima klip na yt A6 sa 2.7 motorom prešao preko milion km
Ako si hteo brz auto samo si trebao da kupis A4 ili A5 sa 3.0 tdi i manual. Pa da vidis ubrzanja i ludila.
Samo servis macak i dje oces sa njim…
Tacno tako bratee