The Untold History of the Notorious V-22 Osprey

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 вер 2024
  • The V-22 Osprey is the US military’s first tiltrotor aircraft. Its distinctive capabilities include taking off vertically and hovering like a helicopter as well as flying forward at high speeds after turning its nacelles. The V-22 Osprey is primarily used as amphibious assault to transports soldiers, equipment, and supplies from assault ships and land bases. As a multi-engine, dual-piloted, self-deployable, medium lift, vertical take-off and landing tilt-rotor aircraft, it is deployed for combat support, combat service support, and Special Operations missions all over the world.
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40

  • @oyvind-b
    @oyvind-b Рік тому +2

    You forgot the aircraft that did a emergency landing in a protected nature area on the island Senja in Norway. That I think may caused the grounding? They couldn't fly it out of there, no roads nearby but the Norwegian defence with US experts and a skilled crew with a big crane and a barge manage to remove it in summer of 22. Good effort from everyone!

  • @BattleHawksNewsNetwork
    @BattleHawksNewsNetwork 3 дні тому

    Crazy how only 1 year later and this video is already outdated

  • @hypercomms2001
    @hypercomms2001 Рік тому +2

    Well actually the XV-15 existed before Operation Desert-claw, but that failure showed the limitations of the aircraft at the time...

    • @mmmmburgerz9442
      @mmmmburgerz9442 5 місяців тому

      Those limitations still exist. When they bought them up 2001 in mass at $40 mill a pop, they had faulty de-icing systems and couldn’t lift Humvees. That faulty part that killed the crew of Gundam22 last year? Yep. Still unresolved after 35 years of flying. It’s a expensive mistake they refuse to can for good.

  • @robertjohnson9884
    @robertjohnson9884 3 місяці тому +1

    How many Marines has this aircraft killed?

    • @johnadams8445
      @johnadams8445 3 місяці тому

      How many soldiers from black hawks? Or 53s? Go find out I'll wait.

  • @cgmax7
    @cgmax7 Рік тому +7

    Meanwhile Bell V-280 Valor on the way

    • @steeldriver1776
      @steeldriver1776 Рік тому +1

      Bell's new Valor, Invictus and Venom platforms are sick! I'd kill to be on those projects.

    • @christhornton1603
      @christhornton1603 Рік тому

      That's what brought us here.

    • @juanmcm
      @juanmcm 8 місяців тому

      They are for different purposes.

  • @carmelpule8493
    @carmelpule8493 22 дні тому

    Those dimensions are very wrong. The folded height is certainly not 8 feet 3 inches.

  • @paulwagner7305
    @paulwagner7305 19 днів тому

    From January 2000 to August 2024, 52 ch-53 helicopters have crash and unfortunately has taken 100 lives. Maybe make a video about that helicopter. Then this error filled video

  • @kenrobertson1463
    @kenrobertson1463 8 місяців тому +1

    Having a lot of experience in military aircraft helos and fixed wing in all levels of maintenance on engines, props and rotors. I could be helpful in the current issues with the osprey. As all of you know, the military doesn't turn to experience for assistant. I have one more year until retiring, let see if they give me a call. Probably won't.

  • @charlesmaurer6214
    @charlesmaurer6214 10 місяців тому +9

    Earlier this year were 9 crashes in 2 months causing a grounding, worse safety record in US military aircraft. The Navy wants to replace the greyhound with this plane/copter that has some great abilities but lack the safety record for general transport. Even the POTUS is barred from the ones in the Presidential fleet. If it is unsafe for comand it is unsafe for the men. Never ask the troups to do what you are unwilling to do.

  • @nedmorris9794
    @nedmorris9794 8 місяців тому

    Is the x2 raider better, faster, stronger?

  • @Move-n-Mountains
    @Move-n-Mountains 4 місяці тому +3

    The reasoning why the osprey was built is ridiculous and misguided to explain a failed rescue mission!!! People in high places, deflect the blame.

    • @badlandskid
      @badlandskid 3 місяці тому

      Yeah, blaming a helicopter is pretty lame. Poor planing from rear echelon bureaucrats was the culprit.

  • @myizukai8478
    @myizukai8478 16 днів тому

    And yet the government went with another version of this aircraft instead of the S97 raider which was indeed a better aircraft by design and performance

  • @JayJay-de5jv
    @JayJay-de5jv 8 місяців тому +1

    Those planes are crap look at how many deaths have happened with those things complete waste of money I wish the family could sue

  • @rickebell3867
    @rickebell3867 4 місяці тому +2

    Sad that the V-22 has killed 62 people in 16 crashes! The V-22 is an engineering disaster and needs a complete re-design.

  • @user-qj3du7gy8p
    @user-qj3du7gy8p Рік тому

    エンジン大きいな

  • @infiniteandunlimitedabundance
    @infiniteandunlimitedabundance 6 місяців тому +1

    The entire concept of having 2 separate highly fuel inefficiency turboshaft engine and tilting is wrong.
    This design is too complicated. Too heavy that won't allow it to generate instant lift with synchronization during emergency.
    All electric drones are very stable to fly because the rotors are fixed with maximum attack angles. By controlling the current will instantaneously create lift on any particularly rotor as well as synchroning all of them together. It allows the drone to perform incredibly jaw dropping aircrobats. But due to the poor energy density of batteries, it's not possible to deploy electric motors on V22.
    In short, V22 needs an ICE VTOL systems that is as simple as electric drones. Otherwise it will never be safe to fly.

  • @jamesshaughnessy1
    @jamesshaughnessy1 6 місяців тому +1

    I'm so frustrated with our military and government over this issue. Our technology isn't advanced enough to support this airframe, its just to complex.

    • @charlesmaurer6214
      @charlesmaurer6214 3 місяці тому

      The killer of the Osprey can’t be fixed at this time, the main killer is any significant difference in lift due to ground effect lift on just one side. Half the crashes are landing on the corner of a deck with 50 feet more from one side than the other giving ground effect lift on just one side. The two propeller design is not fit for vertical landings on a carrier deck edge.

  • @craig4867
    @craig4867 Рік тому +4

    V-22 top speed is not 565 mph!

    • @Military-TV
      @Military-TV  Рік тому +3

      We mean 565km/h

    • @craig4867
      @craig4867 Рік тому +2

      @@Military-TV well you should correct it but that's not what it says and you should know better if you're doing military stuff! Always be accurate and it will put you ahead of the game!

  • @user-sy5ff5jz3d
    @user-sy5ff5jz3d Рік тому

    А давай f-16 попробуем? Мне c-400 нравитца

  • @gairybadresingh925
    @gairybadresingh925 Рік тому

    Why not use jet engines instead of props

    • @AA-xo9uw
      @AA-xo9uw Рік тому +3

      The same reason why the Harrier and Harrier II didn't takeoff vertically with a full payload.

  • @Iamxavierjohnson
    @Iamxavierjohnson Рік тому +6

    Females lower a militarys capabilities

  • @jaimeg9700
    @jaimeg9700 Рік тому

    a drone with a sniper rifle the drone can get close to the enemy the drone will land it can stabilize its self on the ground it can also raise up to hit its targets it will be camouflage so the enemy wont be able to see it the dr can fly in quiet with no sound the military have a set VR head set he or she can control the drone and it will have nite vision the drone will have a laser pointer to hit the target the person controlling the drone can see all around them Jaime G ✌👍🌟

  • @faker213
    @faker213 Рік тому +5

    US junk

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 Рік тому +6

      how so? who's got a better tilt-rotor aircraft?

    • @AA-xo9uw
      @AA-xo9uw Рік тому

      pogue