Orthogonal design using SPSS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @thamesk3523
    @thamesk3523 10 років тому +3

    Thanks for the video. Can you also make a video about testing for the design correlation??

  • @devendralodha4766
    @devendralodha4766 9 років тому

    Thats Great Video showing the Conjoint Analysis in SPPS

  • @tuneit3683
    @tuneit3683 10 років тому +2

    Great video

  • @troumizuki8431
    @troumizuki8431 4 роки тому +1

    how can all the total cards 18 be divided into several group of cards? just like you did in Microsoft Word above? Card ID 5 in the different table? is it need to be classified using SPSS or we can do it manually?

  • @meryavus
    @meryavus 10 років тому +1

    HI thank you for then video but why do you join the cards and put ranks ?

  • @tavarez5426
    @tavarez5426 10 років тому

    Thank you for the video!

  • @ellywin1372
    @ellywin1372 10 років тому +2

    Thank you so much.

  • @Josefk40
    @Josefk40 6 років тому

    Thanks my friend.

  • @bangidikece6785
    @bangidikece6785 6 років тому

    Thank you so much mr.Bikram

  • @javiercruzrodriguez8358
    @javiercruzrodriguez8358 7 років тому

    well done, thanks

  • @orowaleoluwatosin2603
    @orowaleoluwatosin2603 5 років тому

    Hello, I couldn't give my data file a name when I got to the point, it was saying the number of cases generated cannot exceed 0 for this type of design. Please what can I do?

  • @olivianewton4264
    @olivianewton4264 7 років тому

    great video! Thank you, but I don't understand why you added rank in the table in word. What does it mean?

    • @bikramac
      @bikramac  7 років тому +1

      In conjoint survey you can get responses in variety of way, for instance best preferred or get ranked profile. if you get rank data then you have more information than getting best option, if you like best option then you can ignore other ranked data and mark first preferred as the best option

  • @cheyrrss56
    @cheyrrss56 8 років тому

    Dear Bikram, does using this orthogonal desing you show in this video also assures the choice sets are level-balanced, utility-balanced and that Independence From irrelevant Alternatives (no alternative is strictly dominated by another) is accomplished?
    The other question is where to download SPSS for free?
    Thnak you.

  • @vivienlunla
    @vivienlunla 10 років тому

    Thank you very much.

  • @saeidehkhosroshahi826
    @saeidehkhosroshahi826 7 років тому

    Thanks for the video, but what if one of the attributes only have one level.

    • @bikramac
      @bikramac  7 років тому

      If the attributes are not specifically mentioned then it may have either only one level( that means all alternatives have same features it means it doesnt have any contribute on utility structure and trade off between the alternatives) or decision makers doesnt care about that attribute. so we assume that, the decision maker only considers the attribute having higher significance and compares the features (attribute having multiple level) to compare his/her utility of all available alternatives.

    • @saeidehkhosroshahi826
      @saeidehkhosroshahi826 7 років тому

      Thanks Bikram

  • @HarmanSingh-ue8is
    @HarmanSingh-ue8is 8 років тому

    i think rank is itself being generated by spss that should be done but you added it in ms word by yourself, rest the video is self explanatory, thanks