I subscribe to this school of thought. We live in a day in age where there's so much information flying around, we make the mistake of taking it as truth.."..Just because you can find it on google". It is even worse when a famous person says or present it. Society makes quotes out of those and we don't "squeeze them".
The rules of the courtroom do not apply to day to day irl discourse so well. One would be better off using the laws of logic & knowledge of the logical fallacies. Lawyers lie for a living folks. Court is NOT about what is true, it is about what you can make people believe is true.
Thank you for sharing this; Information that you obtained at a high price that is college tuition and fees is reaching and helping many women who need help speaking up for themselves free of charge. Kudos kudos 😇
This was awsome!!! I've already been labelled as a CURMEDGEON 😂 The tools given to me in this wonderful presentation will help me to further reinforce my girlfriend's opinion of me 😂
How can you evaluate facts like a lawyer and distort them to suit your narrative? Truth is of no importance to a lawyer,the only important thing is his clients' case.
A client's case should be the truth. But everybody lies, and not always purposive or with the intent to lie. It's a sad fact that the truth is pretty difficult to establish. Our grip as a species on truth is somewhat idiosyncratic. The best example of this is Eyewitness Tesuimony. It has been well-established that you can have several people witness the same incident, and they will tend to each have a distinctly different memory of the incident. Moreover, their memories of the incident can be contaminated where they were relative to the incident, their on cognitive skills and capacity, and their own psychological status st the time. People are unreliable witnesses, by nature. So, the need to ensure that a clients case is plausible and backed up by credible evidence is critical. And as the amount of innocent people who get locked up in prison, it could be argued that the legal system is less concerned with truth than we would like to admit. And that's of the sometimes conflicting goals and directions. But 8ts for tthe people working as lawyers to strive to keep the process as honest as possible.
🫂🤝🏼Estamos te assistindo aqui da selva andina a 1600m de altitude onde só se chega a pé ou a cavalo, em um lugar cercado de natureza, águas termais e cachoeiras! A única maneira de nos comunicarmos é por uma antena de Internet por satélite e mesmo desta maneira acompanhamos sempre este canal maravilhoso !
Facts didn't seem to matter one bit when it came to the v*ccine, neither did the ethical and professional codes of conduct of so-called medical experts, or media, or neither did the standards and protocols of modern medicine. That the very day before the outbreak were the cardinal rule. But all an instant, all the advancements, achievements and excellence in the field of medical science went right out the window as though it was meaningless.
Her talk, AWESOME. BUT, lately I can't stand to watch Ted Talks any more because of the people that laugh at every single word. The way she talks sometimes is just meant to make the presentation more fun not only funny. It's like the come to a stand up comedy performance not to listen to what the person has to say. It's just cringe!
I love the accuracy.
This is what we do on a daily basis.
I subscribe to this school of thought. We live in a day in age where there's so much information flying around, we make the mistake of taking it as truth.."..Just because you can find it on google". It is even worse when a famous person says or present it. Society makes quotes out of those and we don't "squeeze them".
The rules of the courtroom do not apply to day to day irl discourse so well. One would be better off using the laws of logic & knowledge of the logical fallacies. Lawyers lie for a living folks. Court is NOT about what is true, it is about what you can make people believe is true.
YES YES YES!!!
I've met lawyers who scoff at using logic. They use the techniques of lying and gaslighting and the "gift of gab."
Totally agree with this 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Isn't that how world works?
What is she saying that suggests ignoring logic?
She should be on TV as a comedian. Her talent is beyond a lawyer. 😂
My first thought, too. I'd watch her presenting a documentary. I bet she is great in court.
Spot on re "legal rules can be applied in non-legal situations"... Good talk, thank you.
This is a perfect example of why this holy moment is not the best time to be alive.
Brilliant! Entertaining and I learnt some things, thanks!
@hopebeel8765 I have no idea what you are talking about.
They need to teach this stuff in school as critical thinking is at an all-time low at the moment.
Where is your evidence? :)
Omg, love the way she explained things… 🎉🎉🎉🎉
Asking for evidence should be a lawyer's first priority rather than anything👍
Wow! Great show! Keep up this great work!
Thank you for sharing this; Information that you obtained at a high price that is college tuition and fees is reaching and helping many women who need help speaking up for themselves free of charge. Kudos kudos 😇
How to evaluate facts like a lawyer: Lie and Gaslight.
Thank you so much! Super helpful
This was awsome!!! I've already been labelled as a CURMEDGEON 😂 The tools given to me in this wonderful presentation will help me to further reinforce my girlfriend's opinion of me 😂
This should be taught in every year of highschool.
What?
What is your problem?
What?
New everything
Who are you?
Love this!! 👏🏻
Thank so much
Thank you❤😍🌏❣️❣️❣️
Bravo!
Submit to the BAR
How can you evaluate facts like a lawyer and distort them to suit your narrative?
Truth is of no importance to a lawyer,the only important thing is his clients' case.
A client's case should be the truth. But everybody lies, and not always purposive or with the intent to lie. It's a sad fact that the truth is pretty difficult to establish. Our grip as a species on truth is somewhat idiosyncratic. The best example of this is Eyewitness Tesuimony. It has been well-established that you can have several people witness the same incident, and they will tend to each have a distinctly different memory of the incident. Moreover, their memories of the incident can be contaminated where they were relative to the incident, their on cognitive skills and capacity, and their own psychological status st the time. People are unreliable witnesses, by nature. So, the need to ensure that a clients case is plausible and backed up by credible evidence is critical. And as the amount of innocent people who get locked up in prison, it could be argued that the legal system is less concerned with truth than we would like to admit. And that's of the sometimes conflicting goals and directions. But 8ts for tthe people working as lawyers to strive to keep the process as honest as possible.
I'll allow it
🫂🤝🏼Estamos te assistindo aqui da selva andina a 1600m de altitude onde só se chega a pé ou a cavalo, em um lugar cercado de natureza, águas termais e cachoeiras! A única maneira de nos comunicarmos é por uma antena de Internet por satélite e mesmo desta maneira acompanhamos sempre este canal maravilhoso !
She sound like Michaela stone from manifest
Socratic method
❤❤❤❤❤
In my country there are ahh lot of want to be lawyer🤠🤐👍😎🤓🤓🤠
Haha wish this went for 90mins
👏
❤
Objectio!
The phrasetopic is wrong!
Corina Ijac
WOW
Ok
Canned laughter??
😂😂
Facts didn't seem to matter one bit when it came to the v*ccine, neither did the ethical and professional codes of conduct of so-called medical experts, or media, or neither did the standards and protocols of modern medicine. That the very day before the outbreak were the cardinal rule.
But all an instant, all the advancements, achievements and excellence in the field of medical science went right out the window as though it was meaningless.
She was actually great!
Is she a real lawyer ? If so what State? Lol
You don’t have any research skills, Lisa?
Her talk, AWESOME. BUT, lately I can't stand to watch Ted Talks any more because of the people that laugh at every single word. The way she talks sometimes is just meant to make the presentation more fun not only funny. It's like the come to a stand up comedy performance not to listen to what the person has to say. It's just cringe!
There are no facts in court ... you'd be better off evaluation like a scientist ..
Question I want to ask her, is 'What is a Woman?'
If she can answer that woth facts, she's a keeper
Bet she is all giddy about that.
Trust is Earned 🪇