One thing is to improve lab tests, another thing is to really improve longevity. If you change your way of life a lot of parameters are going to change in a short period of time so you LR quality of life is going to improve , you can even feel younger , but that has nothing to do with rejuvenation or even reducing the pace you are getting older . There are just a few real ways to really increase lifespan , neither of them are doing anything of that because it really required to suffer from time to time . Bio hacking is just a ridiculous business with ridiculous glasses and faked routines. In 3 months I will go to the test to the Olympics , then you can interview me . I will have better results than all of them , I had done some test before . But I know for sure I am not yet in the perfect path to rejuvenation... Just getting started
I think you've hit the nail on the head with the topic, however it seems to me the conclusion is a false dichotomy. It's not that lab results trying to measure biological age are either perfect or useless, but it's a scale in between useless and perfect, and as technology progresses we're getting better and better measurements. Interestingly my entire involvement in this started out by a philosophical investigation of "THE NUMBER": nopara73.medium.com/longevity-game-9a79a8645bd9 Regarding suffering... it's liberating to realize that "the obstacle is the way" :) I'll be happy to interview you if you achieve a good standing. In fact let me share you a little cheatcode. I'll launch a new competition based on PhenoAge (which can be get from traditional lab tests) and in that competition getting to the top if you enroll early will be a relatively easy due to less competition, which will win an interview with me haha
Another panel of young people talking about longevity. It would have made sense if they are 80 or 90 yrs old. How would they know that they will reach, say my age I am now 86 yrs old male. I started my own exercise more than 40yrs ago and still doing it 4 to 5 times a week , enabled me to reach 86 yrs of age. That is a fact not fiction. ,
I tend to agree, FTR I'm planning to launch a competition where "age reversal" counts in absolute number of years (based on PhenoAge for the first year,) which will yield us people to interview who are older.
This is the greatest panel ever! Thank you for this!!
This is one heck of a trio here. Well done getting these three superstars together for this collaboration!
thank you it was great
One thing is to improve lab tests, another thing is to really improve longevity.
If you change your way of life a lot of parameters are going to change in a short period of time so you LR quality of life is going to improve , you can even feel younger , but that has nothing to do with rejuvenation or even reducing the pace you are getting older .
There are just a few real ways to really increase lifespan , neither of them are doing anything of that because it really required to suffer from time to time .
Bio hacking is just a ridiculous business with ridiculous glasses and faked routines.
In 3 months I will go to the test to the Olympics , then you can interview me . I will have better results than all of them , I had done some test before . But I know for sure I am not yet in the perfect path to rejuvenation... Just getting started
I think you've hit the nail on the head with the topic, however it seems to me the conclusion is a false dichotomy. It's not that lab results trying to measure biological age are either perfect or useless, but it's a scale in between useless and perfect, and as technology progresses we're getting better and better measurements. Interestingly my entire involvement in this started out by a philosophical investigation of "THE NUMBER": nopara73.medium.com/longevity-game-9a79a8645bd9
Regarding suffering... it's liberating to realize that "the obstacle is the way" :)
I'll be happy to interview you if you achieve a good standing. In fact let me share you a little cheatcode. I'll launch a new competition based on PhenoAge (which can be get from traditional lab tests) and in that competition getting to the top if you enroll early will be a relatively easy due to less competition, which will win an interview with me haha
Another panel of young people talking about longevity. It would have made sense if they are 80 or 90 yrs old. How would they know that they will reach, say my age I am now 86 yrs old male. I started my own exercise more than 40yrs ago and still doing it 4 to 5 times a week , enabled me to reach 86 yrs of age. That is a fact not fiction.
,
I tend to agree, FTR I'm planning to launch a competition where "age reversal" counts in absolute number of years (based on PhenoAge for the first year,) which will yield us people to interview who are older.