The OBSERVER EFFECT of QUANTUM PHYSICS says: "Your THOUGHTS affect REALITY"
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
- www.artofspirit... (source: "What the Bleep Do We Know") This is one of the key ideas from quantum physics that baffles most people. The philosopher in us screams that something is wrong with the way we understand reality. In fact, I would ask anyone viewing this to come to an honest conclusion: either a) our consciousness (mental activity, perception, observation) effects the behavior of reality (at least on the scale of the tiny), or b) a different conclusion. Personally, I can't come to any other conclusion - can you? Although this seems very bizarre from the view of classical physics, from the view of consciousness theory and spirituality it fits perfectly.
Goddamnit I love how easy this was to grasp in comparison to _any_ other video on the internet.
I know I’m like finally I can explain this to someone lol
It's great because they explained what we know and told us it made no sense instead of trying to explain what we don't know
it's a good way to show other people, that's for sure.
It's a clip from a doc called "What the Bleep do We Know?", which is very worth watching.
Literally my thoughts at the moment
If I was going to code a universe. This would be a very good way of reducing processing requirements.
+benbennit I know and that's what I really don't like.
I don't want to be a program bound by the extremes of the simulation.
I'd prefer to be an external agency having a *virtual* experience through an avatar in a simulation.
How to determine which is the case, though; if this Universe of ours is a simulation?
It'll be interesting when we have a better understanding of our own quantum world and how quantum computers function. Correlations between the two could point to this. Who knows?
My own area of interest is feedback patterns and morphogenesis (chaos). Another programming "shortcut" if you want to see it that way. There's a video about this on my channel.
I don't think it's a matter of wanting or not wanting to be bound by a simulation, that IS reality.
For all we know peering behind the curtain may reveal just another simulation, that's the power of multi dimensional fractals.
@@benbennit if we're simulated that means there is a universe that is actually real. In that case we at least resemble reality in some way. Otherwise we would be completely irrelevant and therefore useless.
@@lVlearchen The realm of God, outside of matter, space and time.
what does 'coding the universe' mean... dont think u can ever do that..
This video is underrated
Very
One of the best I have ever seen
Absolutely, the power behind this message is tremendous! 🙏
This rate is undervideoed
So underrated
I wonder what the universe is doing when I am not watching
Black holes do it for us , that is why photons are trapped. My theory is, it has nothing to do with mass. in fact, math as we know it cannot determine this. I don't know what can , I believe Nikola Tesla was close.
Probably nothing because you’re not there. You are something the entire universe is doing. Your consciousness is what creates reality.
@@SummerBaby728 If we were to be 100% accurate, it is our collective consciousness that creates reality.
@@reallybigguy3120 explain, what does black holes do for us?
partying
This is what my chemistry teacher showed us to explain wave particle duality and an introduction to quantum mechanics. It's really cool because he explained it by talking about how it goes against everything we know about physics and how it makes absolutely no sense and how nobody really gets it
They were all being observed before. It was only the meticulous observation of each one that triggered what seems to be that reaction.
Part of me wants to say it's like the Immaterium from WH40K.
@@Radrook353I always thought that it was simply that the electrons were interacting with particles in the air and producing a wave type motion, which explains the split pattern. Then when observed maybe they got more serious and removed all particles from the area. I'm uninformed and have done no research apart from this video so I doubt I'm right
@@datwolfe3512i don't think physicists would let air interfere. They'd most definitely do it in vaccum or take the air and every other known factors in consideration so as to exclude them one way or the other.
The wavefunction collapses because the measuring device interacts with the wave.
I’ve been showing this video to my students for years. How does this video not have millions of views?? Nice work! Keep it up!
Remember to add, that the wave collapses because the observer interacts with the wave. This video shows the observer-eye being passive observer, but as far as I'm aware, the wavefunction only collapses if there is an active, interacting observer. And that makes the status of "observing" redundant, since interaction is what it is about.
The universe is screwing with us.
Electrons suspended in space time act like a wave, existing as infinite possibilities and potentialities, up until the point when someone with sentience forces it to decide and conform from a wave of potentials to physical particle matter. Which makes sense. Energy has the potential to be anything or take any form as long as it is suspended in space time itself. But once we impose Reality (our reality) upon it, it can not longer exist in potentiality, so that potential becomes a decided particle. We make our realities.
That sounds...I don't know. Sounds crazy but also falls in line with the notion that our thoughts are real things, and that belief/affirmation can be a real force. This is all so mind boggling.
spot on
Really brilliantly stated. I know the theory and feel it to be true but have never heard it put that way. Like elegant and comprehensible.
@@SummerBaby728 So glad it helped! I had to write it down as soon as I could before I forgot entirely. This stuff is mind-blowingggggg!
God is the primary observer or collapses the wave function ..we only see what God shows us
Well, I was planning on sleeping
If I'm remembering correctly, the issue with observation (measurement) at this scale is that its an _active_ process, not a passive one. And so when you try to measure an electron, you end up interacting with it, thus changing the outcome of the experiment.
no way, obviously this video is confirmed proof of simulation theory. or at least that's how illiterates will see it.
Observing is interacting. So u said nothing. A basic single thought create more energy than a car crashing into a wall. Controlled thought. Creates. Instructs. So a thought can form a pattern of particles. Particles are what make up everything in life. The holy grail is how to do it and i figured this shit out.
@@bbkingme8831 🤣
@@Gairith he is 100% correct next time ask questions instead “🤣” to cope with your lack of understanding. A very foolish and arrogant thought pattern that separates the Tesla’s from the matter who didn’t matter.
@@ogunmontgomery103 🤣🤣
The world was not ready for this video , top level animation and great explanation at that time, pure gold
You know this might partially explain why people behave different when they are being watched, vs being “alone”
Compassion Force this may explain much more even in our psyche, if you hold you struggle if you drop it wanis
uhh... simply because the equipment interferes with the flow of electrons...
That has nothing to do with physics
anoynm anonymous They thought so too! So they did experiments with the measurement device there, but just turned off and the electrons went back to performing like waves! Pretty cool
maybe not the same but probably things aren't that diferent as we thought
Thanks, I'll never sleep again
Screaming
😂😂😂
Very fascinating. I wonder at what distance the observer has to be from the slits for the electrons to return to their 'unobserved behavior'. It also makes me wonder what other things in the universe behave this way, and how much it influences our understanding of anything. Why should this (or similar) behavior be limited just to electrons? Does everything that we view as inanimate actually have some level of awareness, or ability to respond to certain stimuli?
We didnot observe via our eyes but from other devices dude. Those devices interfered with the wave function. Not our eyes
@@TheSoultanidis So when devices are there, but shut down, does electrons detect them as a threat? I don't think camera can alter matter outcome, but consciousness might, if it is entangled with quantum dimension. Then on this level of testing consciousness makes an error in physics. Witch proves mind over matter theory.
@@TheSoultanidis if that was the case, then any object that has an electro-magnetic field or what have you would affect the interference...is that the case?
I'm actually going to use this information for a story. Pretty neat, actually.
Quantum eraser experiment, it doesn’t matter, they tried splitting the electron with a crystal to create two entangled electrons, cousins that are the same, and even if you set the observation distance where it takes the cousin entangled electron longer to be observed than the electron reaching the wall, it still behaves retroactive to the fact it will be observed, then if you go further and observe it but then erase the data of it being observed it will behave as if it was unobserved, it knows if you will ever look at any point in the future
Finally, after a few years. I get it. This is the only video that brings Quantum and Classical together
This kind of animation is adorable and I love every microsecond of it.
Such a great video! I didn't need to take notes in order to comprehend what it's trying to say. Very excellent! And it isn't boring.
This is what my grandma meant when she said my toys float and do stuff when I'm sleeping.
This is undoubtedly the best explanation video on this topic
It’s not that the particle is aware it’s being watched. It’s that our awareness bends reality.
How?
@greeksurferdude Awareness is electromagnetic. Changes in Consciousness is a change in charge. It's that simple.
@@genandnic so then, everything is connected, like in the movie avatar?
With any instrument that can observe or measure something it has to emit particles or waves and observe how they bounce back. Like a sonar. Isn't it possible that the instruments are somehow interfering with the particles? I'm sure there is an explanation for this, but I find it strange that this possibility isn't mentioned.
I was thinking that the cameras placement could even cause some type of interruption just by being there. A well placed rock in a small stream will change the way it flows.
Despite the "observer effect" in the double-slit experiment being caused by the presence of an electronic detector, the experiment's results have been misinterpreted by some to suggest that a conscious mind can directly affect reality.
people thought this, and created an experiment called the quantum erasure to test it. Essentially a machine observes data from the experiment, and then erases the record of the data before humans are able to read it. The effect is the same as if nothing ever observed it at all.
Cameron, people like you JUST DON'T WANT YOUR FRAGILE LOGICAL VIEW OF THE WORLD THREATENED. Guess what, the world has moved on, whether you believe it or not, the observer effect is real. Watch the news in less than a year.
@@mwamussa You can't just believe something because it sounds amazing. Think like a scientist. Be critical of everything because there is most likely a logical explanation
?!? This is insane. So the electrons change patterns only when the observation was recorded or something!?! So did it stay as a wave pattern right up to the point that they pressed the record button or what? Need more detail on the method of observation? How was it actually measured which slit the electron went through anyway.
Well. You see, in quantum mechanics interactions with particles are nessesairy if you want to gain knowledge about them. Such act is called the "quantum observation". And, of course, an interation changes the state of the studied Quantum system. Like in the experiment in this video, cancellation of wave properties (called "the collapse of the wave function). Unfortunately, we will have to judge only from the outcomes of the tests, if we do not wish to cause any changes to the studied system.
TL:DR - Consciousness doesn't affect the outcomes of the experiments, measuring devices do.
@@АлександрДадукевич how does one interpret the information from the measuring device without using ones consciousness perhaps the measuring device does not collapse the wave function only at the time that we step in to interpret the result does it actually collapse even if we were to wait a year before looking at the devices measurement????
@@AlgernonGeorgie There is special computer software that does it for us. And if we were to wait the year after the collapse, we will notice, that the wave function of the electron, or other particle that we appear to be studying, will start behaving like a wave again. Unfortunately, it has nothing to do with consciousness affecting the result of the test.
@@АлександрДадукевич can u explain how the special computer software tells us that bez as soon as we obserbe that still leaves the probability that it changed
@@arianagrandaremix8858 I do not understand what you are trying to say here, due to the amount of grammar mistakes. Could you please rewrite it, so i can do it?
This means being a conscious observer effects the universe. I dont know how to feel about this.
Your universe...
My universe ..
Their universe...
Is this why we can “feel” people looking at us even though we can’t see them?
@Meerkat1972 Yeah but even though we're not, we still get a feeling, I wonder why
i've been hunted by a cougar and this is what i think. the spot on my shoulder and neck, my skin was buzzing and prickling with electricity like static and i instantly knew i was being watched by something. the cougars hungry ass gaze absolutely disturbed my skin, i just knew something was narrowly focused on my shoulder from behind and above me on the trail and my brain instantly said "COUGAR!". didn't hear or see a thing coming, my skin saved my skin!
I never wanted this to end
In India , in our ancient scriptures, this phenomenon goes like : yatha drishti tatha srishti . Which means that world is the reflection of your vision.
The singularity had nothing to do with matter. The singularity was the energy of consciousness becomings aware. We are alive within a dispersed field of consciousness and matter is only an illusion.
Possible explanation (b), we are not measuring objective reality (if such a thing even exists) with this experiment, rather we are somehow measuring our own perception/cognition as projected onto the experiment.
Ben Garrido the change in behaviour is because of the photon interaction the measuring device uses to record the electron movement. it doesnt matter if we are watching or if we are in the room even.
Possibly. Possibly we are measuring our own perception instead of objective reality. Possibly objective reality doesn't exist.
notice how in video games the only thing that loads is what you can interact with and if you modify it to show everything, you'll see render errors? this is proof that it happens in real life too and that real life is a video game.
The universe keeps its secrets.
Clearly, there should be multiple answers that are all true at once but our physical world is limited to just one. We should be here and there and everywhere and nowhere all at once but instead we are locked into only one answer.
I was trying to understand this double slit experiment for 2 days but finally what happened in the experiment is crystal clear ........after watching this.....this video is so underrated man 😷
People are saying that the act of measuring a sub atomic particle will affect its behavior, which I agree with. But how can a measurement make a photon act like a particle instead of a wave ? Its like saying if I measure water it will become a solid.
perhaps the physical presence of the observer was messing with the waves, if i put a stick in the water it will destroy a wave pattern
That’s what I was thinking
They could redo this and make sure the wave pattern still occurs. Then add the camera/sensor to see if it then splits into only 2. Then turn the camera sensor off but don’t move it, to see if somehow the electron “sensed” that the camera no longer was watching it and it goes back to a wave pattern. If it doesn’t then it might actually be something to do with the camera lens reflecting something onto it(idk if they used a camera or a sensor I’m assuming a camera?). If it does go back to a wave pattern then that could mean it understood it no longer was being observed/measured, but it also could mean while the camera/sensor was on, that some particles from being electrically plugged in bounced off.
Otherwise, yea it knew it was being observed
I found a solution to the problem of the observer effect in quantum physics
I propose that those who want to install the observation mechanics be a completely separate team and that those who want to shoot the electrons in the two bars to which they will pass be a completely separate team that those who are going to keep the electrons be a team squarely apart also and that the team which is going to crown this whole system is also squarely apart now the team which is going to crown the system which is going to direct the system he tells each one his role.
no one is aware of the other person's role so they will say
- you keep the electrons you come you place that in the propulsion mechanism and you go away
- you arrived there you will draw the electrons
-the observation mechanism you will place the camera on such side of the plate which guards the two holes in which the electrons will pass you will place the camera at such level so that no one realizes what is happening pass
but everyone has in mind the role they have to do
if the electrons are aware that they are observed there they will no longer be aware that they are observed because the system which will take care of the observation will be a camouflaged system so only those who put them know where they are posed
and what are going to shoot also do not realize that there is the hidden camera
those who will be in charge of directing and the project will not be present either so only the one who will shoot will be present the camera is already on everything and everything so he comes he puts the electrons are already there he just comes to shoot
the electron is not aware that the camera is there the person who shot it is not aware that the camera is there none of that so by the way there is not a thought wave that would be in the area and who will perhaps influence the electron because this person who wants to shoot is not aware that there is a camera and that the electron also was not there when the camera was placed everything will happen normally they will shoot
I believe that the electron will be observed when it is forming waves
Thank you so much! I actually understood this experiment only after watching your video!
If you can grasp why the particles have that behaviour, you must be a genius because I sure can't 😅
@SaysRobert damn bro makes sense
You still don't understand it then, because this video is wrong!
@@Ungtartog why is it wrong?
@@Thezombiekiller06 in the last part, there is no collapse of the wave distribution pattern rather a collapse of the description of all possible states when its detected.
All is mental, all is mind.
Aren't we already "observing" when we look at the capture screen. It is a detector and I am observing the "wave" behavior there. No wave function collapse is happening when we detect it with the screen.
First we were just observing the end result or the outcome on the screen whereas in the second time we are also evaluating or watching the process and then the result
Yeah but the second observation is for the process, and not the result
I thought I had a good grasp of physics, but the observer effect makes absolutely no sense to me.
One thing I find incredible is that if you turn the measuring equipment on but turn off the data recording equipment (so you can’t actually observe those measurements) it “knows” what you’ve done and returns to a wave.
This is the best explanation ive heard, is there any more clips or full video of this?
No no no. This is a complete misinterpretation of the observer effect. And the simplistic and skewed explanation of how it was performed is misleading.
It is not about the human mind being the basis of reality, it is about whether the information about which slit the photon took exists in the universe, or not. If that information exists, then we find no interference pattern. If that information does not exist, we find an interference pattern. It doesn't matter whether a human mind is party to that information, or not. A human doesn't have to know the information of which path the photon passed through, for there to be no interference pattern. All that matters is if that "which path" information exists, or not. The experiment can be completely automatic, without any human intervention.
If the "which path" information is contained within the experimental apparatus by some method, there is no inteference pattern.
If there is no "which path" information contained with the system, there is an interference pattern.
Isn't the data uncovered that tells us the outcome "observation" enough? That's the part that confused me. How are we recording ANY data, and considered not observing it?
mossy1 but what does that say about the nature of the particles them self? why do they act differently when being measured?
***** If the case is that the device is interfering with the particles then why do they bothering using the device? And if it's that simple, why don't the physicist just say "we haven't managed to create a device that doesn't interfere with the particles yet"?
That would make more sense then telling the world that they've discovered matter that changes when it's being observed
***** Ok, take it easy, I'm just asking you what you know about it.
it still doesn't make sense. If the test was non-conclusive due to inappropriate tools, why did the test results even bother to get released to the public and further still, why do so many quantum physicists brag about these non-conclusive, failed test results?! it makes no sense. These guys are proud that their testing device is inappropriate?
I'm not buying it. Every time I hear a respectable scientist speak about it they sound fascinated by the situation. There's nothing fascinating about inadequate measuring devices
this is in laymens terms and a good introduction. dont forget where you started. Without a basic introductory, the potential for the best minds to understand is lost.
Its like toy story movie, the toys alive when nobody watching 💀
Agree with mossy1. Your "thoughts" have nothing to do with the observer effect, i.e. the sheer act of observing leads to physical interference with what is being studied. There is no "mind of matter" nonsense going on here.
This conversation never happened. Actually, it did. Because I just watched it. To everyone else that watched it before I did- you never saw it. Go back to sleep.
That children, is what happens when you watch too many r
Brainy-shit vids on the Internet you brain cannot handle.
Had this idea when learned that the human body in fact emits the visible light (albeit non detectable to our eyes), if a camera sensitive enough to detect it was set in a total darkness, and then the image recorded projected on a monitor/VR headset (backt to the person redorded, in a real time) - ta-da!, the observer and the observed are one, literally.
What are you on about.
I had a fuckin stroke trying to read this. This made no sense.
I suspect the people ridiculing other comments took one course on this subject and think they're experts. I imagine genuine physicists wouldn't be so dismissive and condescending. When you're an expert in any field it actually makes you realize you have so much more to learn rather than thinking you know it all.
It is amazing. If you yawn while looking inside a sealed bus with a dozen or so people encapsulated inside, unaware consciously of your presence or the fact that you are observing, roughly half of them will yawn, even if you yawned first and/or didn’t see someone yawn first. The person in the front didn’t see those behind them yawn either. Everything and everyone, matter and energy, has an unconscious collective consciousness, like the twisted pair. Same with the intuition of being watched or intuition in general. We are all part of the same oneness or whole or Spirit of God. Though removed from it, at least somewhere, time/space/spirit/consciousness are a singularity. At that point everything is omniscient and omnipresent. There/then everything is all the same thing, like the Trinity/Triune God, where we simultaneously exist as both ourselves spiritually and yet still everything, at least I think so. That’s one reason to do what you know what’s right, because everyone and everything, even your grandma, knows everything that you do that is right or wrong, including you, hence your conscience, which is what I believe is your one peek into the truth of what the greater Holy Spirit/God thinks. That’s why it’s important to always be truthful with regard to objective reality and faithful to one’s conscience. Realize that you too are being observed. At least in Heaven, everyone who hasn’t been cast into the lake of fire will know what the rest of us already do, that almost nobody voted for Joe Biden.
You talk about bigger things than politics and then you bring it up. Fuck politics, fuck biden, fuck trump, etc. Focus on the bigger things in life rather than the politicians trying to gain power.
You had me until Biden.. smh uou MAGA people are unwell
I have nothing against religious beliefs, but being objective here, the double slit experiment has absolutely nothing to do with the human mind or sight. The "observer" is more of a measurement. Whether you have your eyes closed or not, the results will be the same. So please don't think this is saying if you think hard enough you can fly or walk through walls.
Paul Jordan The particle is effected because it's getting measured. Therefore, from the particles perspective, it is being observed so it decides to act differently
+Troy not really, i was confused to. the observer effect take place because in quantum world even the tiny interaction makes a change and to measure the results the interaction has to be made .
+Paul Jordan THANK YOU
You I know right? They used a piece of technology, not the human eye. It could be that the piece of technology interfered with the experiment.
john doe post a source or get the fuck out. I don't want someone who can't even spell "specific" to lecture me on quantum physics. You wouldn't be here if you *actually* understood what you think you do.
+Your Friendly Neighborhood Psi-Ops Then why are you here?
It's not the act of conciously observing that causes this. It's the interaction on a quantum scale of the devices or rather the particles used to detect the electron that cause it to change. Light included.
It's the physical changes we inadvertently make while attempting to measure something. If you put a thermometer in some sort of matter, water works well, you change the temperature of the water just by making contact between the thermometer and the water. If you have a thimble full of hot water in a room cooler than the water and quickly use several thermometers, each one cooler than the water being tested, you will notice the water will get cooler with each attempt to measure it's temperature. And it will do it faster than if you had placed a single thermometer in the water and left it there for the water to be measured over the same amount of time.
There are countless ways an observer can inadvertently make changes to what they are observing based on what devices they are using to observe. Minimizing this effect will produce purer outcomes. And lastly there are ways to invoke the observer effect without physical interactions when it comes to psychological experiments amd even animal behavior. Those are cases that would resemble what's being told in this video. The subject being aware of the observation will most certainly skew the results. But an electron cannot be aware of the observer.
Thanks for this great elaboration. I just hope that these people will lighten up to reason.
So then the whole thing doesent make any sense.
its not that it doesnt make sense... its more so there isnt enough data to come to a complete and concrete answer because its just that damn bizarre... Ocular perception apparently influences particles/particle waves in a way that warrants more and more study....
it lends credence to the "This reality is a simulation" theory... which more and more.. as time goes on.. its lookin that way.
"It's the interaction on a quantum scale of the devices or rather the particles used to detect the electron that cause it to change" That's a bold claim to make, my friend. It's OK if you don't believe the observer effect, because intuitively makes no sense to you, but to boldly deny it because you assume there is an uncontrolled interaction, is foolish, close minded and against science.
+You Tube It's not that it "intuitively makes no sense," it's that, based on basic physical principles, if you throw photons at an with a mass anywhere from the size of a pin head to a planet, said photons will have no effect on the object since the mass of a photon is so minuscule that it has no effect on the object at which said photons are being projected. You never see anyone debating the results of an experiment saying that "our minds shaped the outcome" because everyone can clearly see that photons being projected at a non-quantum object has no effect on said object; you only see these quacks offering their "insight" where experiments involving the behavior of quantum objects is concerned because the average human being has no intellectual defense against such claims. No offense, but I know that you haven't invested the proper amount of time to be appropriately knowledgeable on this subject matter. By basic conservation of momentum it can be proven that light particles (photons) will have some effect on quantum particles by the formula m1v1i+m2v2i=m1v1f+m2v2f (where m is mass and v is velocity). While I agree that it's close-minded to say that there's no way that our sense of the universe has some effect on the universe, I feel like you're saying what it is that you're saying from a place of ignorance rather than having either studied the concept in an academic setting or done an extensive amount of personal research. From the proof that I previously supplied, we know for a fact that light particle at least change the final speed of the particles being studied, but thanks to quantum physics being a rather complicated field, the interaction between the two particles could go even more in depth (due to entanglement, magnetism, electrical charge, gravitational fields, etc.). It's not that you aren't welcome here, but you really should do some kind of cursory research before insulting someone else's thought process; being a mindless sheep is just as bad as being close minded.
This is just like almost any video game you play when you're not looking at something, it's not there until you look at it. It's a tactic the devs use to reduce lag
The concept of such a theory became apparent to me by means of computer games and the theory i put to practice when approaching stop signs and intersections; initially there is no traffic in sight due to loading time, seconds after traffic appears, I refer to this as traffic lag. Whenever approaching an intersection I just accelerate to beat the traffic lag, please take note this hack will work until the next universe processor upgrade so make the most of it while you can.
We are in a simulation confirmed
What has this to do with a simulation ?
@@johnghost9886 figure it out
Project gateway on cia.gov
@@dallaspatton1118if this was a simulation no Cia or NCIS or kgb would have anything to do with it.... We are too self centered to the point to even consider imagining such thing
@@ortopediasobrerodas9957 dmt trips lsd trips and shroom trips have shown me the fabric of reality and it is based off holographic technology. And they arent involved in it's making but the cia still studied it and released the documents on project gateway. If you read about dmt hyperspace it somewhat explains it also. I've seen it and its complex.
I think if that experiment would be replaced with a canon sand( not laser canon) would happen the same thing. It means : the experiment doesn't show anything because sand is particle, that( same thing ) would happen with all things as : water, sugar grain,salt grain, sand grain etc...( the photon doesn t interfere with itself but crashes with border of slit part (ricocheted the lips/borders of the slit )
Could it be the observing device is interfering with the way the electron is behaving?
This is the documentary Mark Vicente made. He later became the right hand man of Keith Raniere the founder of the cult NXIVM.
But the study is legit?
Can someone please send me a video of this experiment being performed in real life showing the observer effect and the wave function collapses, if not, why does this not exist?
Probably hard for your average joe to interpret all the data
It's because this is a thought experiment. Only in 1970s did we find a somewhat feasible way of actually doing the experiment by putting a film over a slit to detect the "particles" but doing so changes how they propagate so the observer effect experiment (which-way experiment on the double slit wiki page) is purely just a thoughy experiment and is not real
To my understanding the only reason why things work the way the work is because they are under constant observation and the only thing I can think of that can watch everyone all at once is god himself
until weve figured how our conscience and self-awareness can exist in the first place Id rather not worry why our conscience filters reality the way it does. egg before the chicken
Pybro He’s comparing our self awareness to the way electrons behave
we cant figure out what our consciousness is because its not a matter, thats why physicists believe that we alter reality
But like the egg and the chicken they are connected. We need both to understand.
@@spookysahara2458 No... Dont just say things when you dont know what you are talking about...
You would rather know how consciousness works before we know how consciousness works. That is basically what you said.
there's a slight problem with this video:
it's true that the electrons behave diffrently when we observe them but that's not because of our thoughts like the title of this video will suggest. the thing is, observation is not a passive action as it would seem for us since we can only observe a thing due to it reflecting photons to our eyes. on a subatomic scale, photon interactions become a n important interaction that might affect systems.
so no, our thoughts do not affect reality
I got goosebumps , perfectly illustrated, tx
What is the animation from? Is it a kids show i want to see more
It's from "what the bleep do we know?"
You think time might work like this? It’s kinda like in those movies where they ask a medium for the future. The future is limitless potential, but as soon as someone glimpses it, it becomes more of a solid inevitable.
Perhaps this suggests that our thoughts directly affect matter. Is it too far a stretch to suggest that conscious thought is a fundamental force of nature?
Yea that is a stretch too far. Where is the evidence that the measurement has to be consciously observed? At the LHC millions of observations are made and sorted through only by computers but i bet some of the data show quantum effects.
Where is the theory about how such an interaction could take place (keep in mind Quantum theories are equations)?
And what exactly is meant by "consciousness" anyway? How can it be reliably measured?
It is
An atom on a whole is relatively empty, this empty space is controlled by our energy ie consciousness. Also, we are basically made 99.99 percentage of our consciousness
No it's not too far a stretch, only problem is there would need to be proof. There could be other reasons this is happening. Perhaps there are invisible forces in physics we haven't discovered yet.
Go pray to your invisible god
0:15 hey hey he said balls he said balls haha
Bro I'm an Advaita Vedanta student and this has just blown my mind. The sages have always been said the truth!!
Hii, I want to learn about advait vedant.
Could you please explain advait vedant in simple language?
This is a great video, and I remember watching it a couple years back.
That being said, your title is very problematic. To say that the "consciousness somehow affected the motion of the electrons just doesn't make much sense. For one, the researcher performing the experiment would be expressing consciousness whether the electrons were acting as expected or acting as they do when observed on a quantum level. It's the photons used to observe the electrons' movements that change the way they act. It's just physics. Consciousness is a metaphysical concept. Metaphysics is inherently abstract from physical interactions.
I suppose all of this might ring differently if you happen to believe that consciousness exists corporeally, rather than as a concept. But even so, the point remains that the presence of a thinking mind doesn't act as the deciding factor in how the experiment proceeds.
I respect your point. My view is obviously tainted by my metaphysical background. As I've said before: I could understand photons "deflecting" things when measuring, but collapsing a wave to a particle ... I don't feel that argument is stronger than the observer collapsed it with his consciousness. I guess its a matter of opinion, logic and intuitive perception which way you interpret.
Its not because of observation, its from measurement. Very different things.
Dear people of UA-cam…. Please share this video everywhere. I heard it’s an underrated video. Don’t forget… making a highlights video might get you views as well as the original. You do make reality what you want it to be. Hustle. Get out of Wage Slavery. Hire others. Retire. Live life.
You cannot observe without interracting with the particles. Therefore observation might be the interraction that coused the electrons to act like particles.
This was such a great video, it shows how little we understand about our universe. Are particles conscious? What is consciousness? We think we know so much about the universe but we know so little. We have no explanation to what consciousness is
Consciousness is more energy than a particle.
God? Is that you?
King David yes
you are god you are the creator of this reality
Not god the Creator
It is the flying spaghetti monster
No, King David . I'm...
BATMAN
I am currently at 1:13, and have to say this is the best and most simplisticly and easily explained video on this topic. I dont know why so many teachers of physics in the world, either half understand it themselves and thus teach it wrongly too then, or dont know how to teach at all.
Ps: Currently at 3:57, and not the best and most easy 'and thus'///ie ideal explaination on this topic, one professor explained it very nicely in a video, but still a better video than 90% of the stuff explaining physics who are many a times wrongly explaining it (or else very badly explaining it), nonetheless.
Observation effect:
Have they used a living creature like a Quantum Robin wired with an electrograph to measure brainwave activity during the experiment? Did shielding or distance of observation equipment alter the results?
It would be interesting to add these elements during observation
I also wonder if it was a camera placed near the slit if the camera's own electromagnetic field affects the behaviour of the electron, cancelling out the wave before it heads through the slit so to speak, so would moving the position of the camera have an effect?
Did you ask chat gpt 4 or idk Google?
i think you're trolling but if not
this video is misleading. Observation of quantum particles is an active process. You can't just see an electron travel. If you want to measure an electron's position, you need to interact with it in some way. That physical interaction is what starts the change in behavior.
Still confusing and open to interpretation as to what's really going on, but it's not like electrons change their behavior depending on whether a conscious being is watching.
@@ts4gvi am not good at physics at all but i know that we can't see atoms yet, so i wondered how they even observed it so your explanation makes so much sense
@@zizojaezekeom3565What do you mean we can't see Atoms?
Some things are just better left unknown and undiscovered. Not only for our mental well-being, but for our sanity.
Lol. I know what you mean 👀💭
it's amazing, we create our reality. this is way beyond our five senses. I'm not a religious person, but I think JESUS knew this. that's why he said if we have faith the size of a mustard seed, we can create miracles. wow
fuck jesus
@@Coregame3 blessings 🙏
@@Coregame3 He's not here so I don't think he can
It's not the observation that gives the experiment false results.. the camera runs on electricity, so when aimed at light it charges them slightly enough to obscure the test💯
This video has an error on the observer part. It shows the observer as a passive observer that does not interact with the particles/waves. However, observing requires the interaction, so fair play would be to make the observer eye also shoot light or other radiation and that's what changes the outcome.
That's some BS...and it's a guess as to what is actually happening. A photon has zero rest mass, not zero mass. In effect, this means that a photon can only exist when moving at the speed of light (which varies depending on the material the photon is passing through). I believe a photon leaves the firing mechanism massless, and anything massless can only travel at the speed of light. Then it hits a field of quantum gravity that collapses the particle into a wave. Cern, showed conclusively that gravity pulls antihydrogen downwards and that, at least for antimatter, antigravity does not exist. I conclude that gravity exists in antigravity, meaning gravity is everywhere, especially in a Higgs Boson field, and it is this gravity that is creating the collapse in a double slit experiment...So, in a resting state the particle is in a superposition of non reality, and is not being observed,. As it leaves the firing mechanism it becomes real and immediately collapses into a photon particle by attaining some kind of mass through quantum gravity. A Planck length mass that cannot be measured. The observation, including your thoughts give it more quantum mass and it collapses into a wave. Now, the scientific community says that photons are massless and their light can be bent around planets creating gravitational lensing. If that were true, wouldn't the photons be going through whatever is in front of them and we would see the light from galaxies 13.8 billion years ago, directly, as opposed to gravitational lensing?...I know it sounds crazy and I apologize to the readers for sounding stupid...thx for reading:)
Who here from So?
W44VY me 😂
W44VY I’m sleep 😂
What's So?
What’s the channels name I remember they used this video in their video about simulated reality but I don’t remember the video name please help
I only WISH I had found this video when I did SO. Now I'm in college studying for a test
They did something wrong(at some stage of experiment) and jumped in to a conclusion at first thinking that particle interferes with itself when shoot it one at a time. Then they put an “observer” measuring tool and made sure that everything is according to what the experiment was aiming for and saw how things really are when you shoot an electron through two slips, so with an “observer” measuring tool they have just cancelled out their mistake they did at first(without it) and not changed/influenced the behaviour of an electron. So the statement that “physicists are clever” is just a trick of convincing.
Our thoughts have nothing to do with this. "Observed" means "measured," and you don't have to be around for the measurement... zero thought needed.
To anyone that comes across this. An observation in quantum mechanics isn't someone looking observing something. An observation is essentially a measurement or interaction. Two atoms exchanging electrons is an observation if a person is seeing it or not. Our thoughts have no bearing on reality outside of the ways we choose to interact with it.
This video is 100% woo
If a tree falls in the forest and no one's around to see it...
There's an alien civilization watching us struggle with this, while absolutely pissing their pants with laughter at the absurdity and stupidity of our scientific achievements and knowledge thus far.
Conclusion b) the way the researchers measured made the wave unstable and collapse into a particle.
That doesn't mean the same happens when you look at something.
I could understand photons "deflecting" things when measuring, but collapsing a wave to a particle ... I don't feel that argument is stronger than the observer collapsed it with his consciousness. I guess its a matter of opinion, logic and intuitive perception which way you interpret.
Thanks for all that - very enlightening : )
Late in the game here, but I was just curious...the video said they used a "measuring device" to see which slit it actually went through and then it acted like a particle. Are you suggesting the measuring device has a consciousness?
This is the best video I’ve found explaining the two slit experiment and why it is so baffling. It’s got to be consciousness, that’s what’s being left out in the theory of everything.
@SnivyLink It really is baffling, I’ve been infatuated with this stuff for years. I’m becoming more and more convinced that consciousness is more than just a byproduct of humanity. I’m leaning more towards it being a separate entity altogether that’s connected to everyone and everything. Like a symbiotic relationship between carbon based reality and something else.
This was a great watch. I have been researching this concept/theory for weeks each video was good however this just helped me grasp it much better!
Just like the ionic force, you can control the rhythm of water because you consist mostly of water. Have you not seen the experiment conducted by a Japanese scientist that shows that your molecules freeze differently under different music that means essentially that you can be changed by vibration and vibrational force and as 😢easily as Quantum string theory vibrational force, as it may be
Just goes to show there’s no limit to the truths of the universe.
Also that logic can sometimes be the ignorance that limits us, and that logic is only reliable when a scenario is within the boundaries of what we can fathom.
Either consciousness is in everything or the detector is emitting some kind of frequency that is interfering with the behavior of the particles. Those are really the only two explanations that sound reasonable....
So how do we manifest
😄
I tried watching other videos on how the double slit experiment works and was left like feeling like Patrick Star from SpongeBob. Who knew a random early 2000s looking cg model would vastly help me understand this concept. Thank you!
Hmm That mystical explanation didn't rule out a mere _physical_ affect the addition of that nearby observer apparatus may have had on the electron's behaviour.
Stop putting emphasis.
These spiritual woke wanna be just nitpicking bullshit science to live along their sad depressing lives
Maybe it started acting more like marbles again, because the instrument used to watch it, interfered with the interference.
You cannot observe without interracting with the particles. Therefore observation might be an interraction that coused the electrons to act like particles.
good point
I never realized John Astin did voice over work like this. Nice.
The understated power of the observer' will never be known but its influence will always be recorded.
Reffered by Shanu Arora (physics teacher, India)
What an amazing video it was....
Absolutely fantastic 😍
If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound, essentially
I watched this ages ago and came back to this because I was thinking about the fact that every spot on this planet is "observed" at any time. (Satellites etc.)
Idk if this has any impact or not, but if it does I would love to know the implications of this fact...
No, this is not how that works.
maybe at least explain what I am misunderstanding thanks.
@ShivaTrap Hi, sorry for my very silly comment.
I really can and should do better.
I was just shocked by all the scientific illiterate people interpreting all sorts of things into this.
Anyhow, would you be so kind as to explain me what you actually mean by observing?
The video did a bad job at showing what that means in the context of this scientific experiment.