I have a feeling that this could be an allegory of some sort. Much like the Churning of the Milky Ocean may be an allegory for Precession. I can't wait for the next part. Thank you Mr Oak.
There are so many strange unexplained events in all the puranas , Ramayan and mahabharat also.we need more scholars for proper guidance. Thank you Nilesh ji.
Nilesh ji..first time i came accorose your talk on sattology...and my life takes a turn..questions of ramayan and mahabharat from my childhood apearing again and now i m in derection of that searching correct answers...thank you so much..dhanyawad...u made me learn sanskrut..and study our itihaas on our own..i m happy that i can pass correct knowledge to my chiled and hope fully she add more in it and so on..
🙏Namaskar dr Oak ji.....Thank you for the video....I really liked the presentation....Hope everyone has a blessed Diwali....Namaskar from South Africa 🇿🇦 🙏🙏
Nileshji, can the Kaam in Purushartha actually stand for Karma? It gives a different dimension to the meaning of Purushartha as Dharma-Artha-Karma-Moksha. Step1: Dharma is supreme. Step2: Understand the Artha (meaning) of Dharma Step3: Orient your Karma (actions) towards Dharma based on this understanding Step4: Once your Karma is oriented towards Dharma, it will lead you to Moksha. Isn't this also what Shri Krishna says to Arjun? Would love to hear your answer if you read this question. 🙏
Everyone should learn sanskrut...the word itself tells the mining..no further elaboration needed...dharma =duty, Arth= wealth, Kaam = desire, moksh= liberation. Even it's sequence is very important..it is again related with 4 aashram vyavastha.. Brahmachrya, gruhasth, vanprasth, sanyaas ..first gain gyaan (Brahma) do duty accordingly second gain welth according to dharma, now third loos all the desire of self according to dharma, and forth automatically u achive moksh...dhanyawad
@@amidave2153 Namaskar Amiji. Shubh Dipawali. I wish you all the best in your journey of learning Sanskrut, it is a wonderful quest. My connection with Saunskrut probably began in my previous human lives and in this life has continued for over 50 years now. One cannot grasp the depths of Saunskrut in one life time. Some minor comments to what you have written. There is no concept of a "word" in Saunskrut. Word is a modern English term. Saunskrut originated with "sound", AUM obviously being the Pranava or primal sound. This is also why for millennia it was transmitted orally and not written down. Only oral transmission captures the sound, written text does not. Even the pronunciation can alter the meaning. The first sounds emerged from the Damru of Mahadeva. These are called Maheshwara Sutrani. Maharishi Panini took the base of the Maheshwar Sutrani, and then arranged them in his Ashtadhyayi. This is what we today refer to as the Varnamala or Saunskrut grammar. The "sound" Purusha first appears in the Hrugveda Samhita in the Purushasuktam. In this suktam, Purusha is a reference to THE cosmic being. This is who we today devotedly personify and worship as Shiva. Hrugveda, as you may know, is "probably" the oldest of the Saunskrut texts. Chronologically Ramayan and Mahabharat happened later and this is where the "sound" Purushartha appears. The suktam is the baseline theory and artha is the meaning or explanation of that theory. Instead of interpreting it as man's quest for attaining material wealth and material desire, which has nothing to do with Shiva or Purusha, rather reorient your thoughts that it is finding the true meaning of the path that leads you to Shiva or Purusha, which is through Dharma. 🙏
You have explained so well and this will definitely change the outlook towards our Itihasa. I hope we will able to see truth though made up stories come forward. Thank you Nileshji!
There are metaphors and symbolism - ways to express the bad, worse, and the absolute worst happened. If we're sensitive to understand the layers of meaning, we're all set to understand and learn from the epics - because, there certainly are learning points - of how to be, how not to be..what to choose and what not to choose - in Dharma. Choosing dharma over adharma.
Sir the details mentioned in all these references are not all that has happened in those incidents in those days Unless the details mentioned in the references are considered as word to word Transcriptions I always wonder how can someone say so surely as if they stood right next to them while the incidents / conversations are happening.
@NileshOak ji, I would like to read and interpret the Ramayan & Mahabharat from original Sanskrit text. However I find myself lacking the required Sanskrit language skill. May I request you to guide me where do I start and what is the optimal path to that level of Sanskrit knowledge. This question may have been asked before, and you may have traversed this path, hence the question Thank you in advance.💐🙏
Many things mentioned in Mahabharat and Ramayan were literally figure of speech. Down the generations since this is thousands of years old, people have simply taken these figure of speech literally. For example- 1. Hanuman lifting mountain 2. Krishna lifting mountain 3. Hanuman gulping up sun in childhood.
That is your opinion not fact. fact is it's mentioned in the itihasa (this is how it happened) in history book Mahabharata 5000 years ago. our opinions if are against facts then those opinions and arguemtns are wasted. we will never know the truth as observable fact from the past. maybe there is god and he is omnipotent to incarnate and do all these. if he is not omnipotent then he is not god. according to these book there is god and he is omnipotent. logic only has 2 options in this situation either give up and accept the textual evidence as truth or skip these unsolvable questions as mysteries and move ahead.
Very nice case study...after this please make another case study on is draupadi wife of yudhisthir? Or of all five brother ?? Because with five brother this condition I m not digesting...so if possible please do...dhanyawad
In Pop culture, based on BR Chopra’s Mahabharata, we already know that the vastraharan did not happen - thanks to Krishna’s grace but only an attempt was made. What’s new?
Sir but the sloka धर्मार्थ-काम-मोक्षाणाम्, उपदेश-समन्वितम् पूर्व-वृत्त-कथा-युक्तम् इतिहासं प्रचक्षते , is from Brihad Bhagavatamitra which was written in 16th century
Both Kunti and Gandhari were very stron women, I don't think they would have allowed such humiliation of Draupadi, secondly the excuses given for inaction by Bhishma, Dronacharya, Vidur, etc are very feeble..
I remember it was something like it was her female nature protected her.. miracles can’t be taken seriously right.. like SriKrishna can’t lift the mountain, it must be like he became “protector of the area” by merging with Narayana consciousness(enlightened) on top of that mountain.. that too single pinky finger???… so what i read indicates something bloody floor from her PMS must have happened.. & no body can touch her in that state..
You need to cut the repetition of the point. Listeners who are plugged in, on such a subject are already of higher IQ, we don't need one idea to be presented in 3-4 angles . dissection of the scene is required but repetition of it 3-4 times gives it sense of soap opera scenes, where the story is stretched just to prolong it, suffice it into several episodes.
What is the point of all this? BR Chopra’s Mahabharata is for mass audience so many of the events were dramatized for entertainment purpose. Vastraharan did take place, but not as dramatic or sensational as we have seen on TV or film. That is all.
What do you think stopped Dusshasana and made him sit down? ↓ Bro, there is no response for what didn't happen. 🌝 I think this interpolation is made to justify the death of the character of Karna _also called Vhrisha.
I have C. Rajagopalachari's short english translated version of Mahabharat and it says "Prathikami" and he is also described as Duryodhana's charioteer, which can make sense because charioteers can always be present in the court where their masters are present so that they can be ready to obey their master's command at any time to set out to travel in the chariot.
Sir, u have immense knowledge, but here let us analyse the other way, yudishtar don't want war with anybody and he was ready to forego his kingdom, and here u pls note he is with tatva guna, and lord Krishna says when he comes for mediation that if yudishtara gets angry no fighting is necessary just his anger will kill anybody, and secondly yudishtar was not a gambler as said, he dont know how to play dice, several tv serials and pictures portrayed yudishtar like that. Further yudishtar was great of all others almost equal to bhishma or vidhur in knowledge.
Even if it did, what's the problem? There were bad people and mistakes made in all yugas. Why trying to rewrite everything to show some kind of perfection in ithihasa. After all it's a human story of human history. Why be bothered trying to revise itihhasa? People are denying Sita's agnipariksha too so that they can defend Ram as perfect. But why? Why should an avatar be perfect or why should these stories about their lives be perfect? Avatars after all have a human form which is an epitome of imperfection. Shri Ram came as a human being to experience the trials and tribulations of human life with its foibles. If he needed to be perfect, he neednt have had a human life and could have taken a disembodied Vishnu avatar.
It seems that to show the devinity of lord Krishna,this apisode might have been inserted later because King yudhisthir was not a foolish.When he himself was defeated in gambling and became das slave how he can wet draupadi? Any way every war on this earth was faught for woman booty or land.
परम आदरणीय आपकी किताब या इस प्रकार के प्रमुख विषय को मॉस में जाना आवश्यक है जैसे रामचरित मानस की मध्यकालीन काल में सनातन धर्म को बचाने में बड़ी भूमिका रही है । भजन मण्डलियो के द्वारा नायनार आतवार संत दाक्षिण भारत से उत्तर भारत में आम नागरिक भारत को उद्वेलित प्रेरित किया सो इस पर कुछ विचार करिए ।
@@NileshOak What do you think stopped Dusshasana and made him sit down? ↓ Bro, there is no response for what didn't happen. 🌝 I think this interpolation is made to justify the death of the character of Karna _also called Vhrisha.
Yes, Dussasana didn't succeed in disrobing Draupadi. But I understand that initially Draupadi tried to defend herself but couldn't and finally prayed to Lord Krishna. Though Lord Krishna is omnipresent, didn't save Draupadi till the moment she gave up completely and prayed for Him.
Maybe you're making up things to dissaprove the text which has been passed on for centuries, & according to the previous younger drayas event the ramayan date not match , and the most needed question how old are the yugas , you're just skipping this question , How old is kaliyug then and is kali yug again repeated continuously 2 times , since 12200- 5500 bce =6,700 dwapar yug age , and 5500 +2023= 7,523 kali yug age is greater than dwapar ?
Not sure what yuga theory has to do with the topic of this video? if you disagree with his thesis, then tell us with which points you disagree and why.
Most likely the first and foremost written copy of Mahabharat was written by Lord Ganesha with his tusk as a pen, while Maharishi Vyasa narrated the verses to him. And the script is obviously Devanagari since the language written was in Sanskrit. For the timeline, I don't think Nilesh says that it is 70000 years old. It might be 7000+ years old given that Nilesh provides the date of the first day of Kurukshetra war to be 16th October 5561 BCE based on the astronomical hints given in the Mahabharat when the war started. This date based on astronomical references is something he provides in another video.
@@amazingcalvin Namaskar and Thank you. BTW, the script won't be Devanagari (very likely) but that is irrelevant. Again, Ganesha writing could be a metaphor and hagiographic addition, again irrelvant.
Nilesh yes you have good knowledge But asking 20 times to go and read the original edition looks arrogant and redundant. It looks like you want tell people you don’t know this. Don’t insult your listeners boss
He is right to say that. . people ask question without reading Mahabharata themselves.. I don't feel it's wrong anyway... He is just very straight forward
What is the point of saying that *"Vastraharan"* did not happen after explaining whole incident yourself 😂 except to draw viewers 😂. Good idea to increase views. ❤😉😘
Sorry Nilesh, you are wrong. Please do not extend your logic to actual happenings. I follow your logic and do appreciate your work but not your intention. One question how often do the Astronomical events occur again and again. Say the planetary line up for Ram Janam. Does it happen every 65,000 years or longer.
She did married five of them and yudhishthir was the one to prove that it's a valid marriage. Why would she marry yudhishthir alone when Arjuna was the one to win the competition.
The Mahabharata was first composed as a 8000 slokas, then it was enlarged to 32000 (?) slokas and finally after the Kurukshetra war it was enlarged finally to 100,000 slokas, when lots of manipulations took place, insulting the imperial Yadava tribe, criticizing them for greed and lust for power etc. Draupadi's Vastraharan is just a part of the diminishing effect to which the Yadava were treated in addition to insulting Krishna and Arjun and replacing the Sanatan religion with Semitic Hinduism by the Kuru (Turks) led by the Babylonians. In short superior Indian theology was manipulated to break the Indian spine from which the Indians never recovered. That this Vastraharan didn't happen is part of the conspiracy by those who protect the Kuru/Hinduism against Sanatan by BJP/RSS promoting Hindutya.
New laws must be passed in India and across the globe that those who misuse the religious verses to spread their anti-dharmic opinions and political agendas/propagandas must be banned from the land to some island where all criminals will stay together in a prison in their stupid fantasy imaginary world for rest of their lifes.
Why are Indians scared to face the facts and reasonings of the Kuru destroying the Yadava and massacring woman and children fleeing after the Kurukshetra war, why does the Indians abandon superior theology of Krishna's Sanatan religion and replace it with Semitic Hinduism? Why manipulate Indian scriptures to distort reality?@@rakeshtiwari1857
![Ayodhya-Lanka-Ayodhya [14 years of Rama's travel during Vanavasa]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-_KKYut4Kd0/mqdefault.jpg)
I have a feeling that this could be an allegory of some sort. Much like the Churning of the Milky Ocean may be an allegory for Precession. I can't wait for the next part. Thank you Mr Oak.
@@bmjb1726 Thank you for the information.
provide verse no instead of making fun of your imaginary event@@bmjb1726
🤦🤦 why you want to take interpret stories of earth to cosmos?
Your pronounciation for Dyuta is not correct... correct is द्युत
It is very worthy of listening from spiritual genius oak sir..thanks sir
Yessir sir
There are so many strange unexplained events in all the puranas , Ramayan and mahabharat also.we need more scholars for proper guidance. Thank you Nilesh ji.
Thank you. Stay tuned as this series progresses.
Very great Guru ji 🙏
Nilesh ji..first time i came accorose your talk on sattology...and my life takes a turn..questions of ramayan and mahabharat from my childhood apearing again and now i m in derection of that searching correct answers...thank you so much..dhanyawad...u made me learn sanskrut..and study our itihaas on our own..i m happy that i can pass correct knowledge to my chiled and hope fully she add more in it and so on..
Thanks and welcome
🙏🙏
🙏Namaskar dr Oak ji.....Thank you for the video....I really liked the presentation....Hope everyone has a blessed Diwali....Namaskar from South Africa 🇿🇦 🙏🙏
🙏🙏
Nilesh ji when you get time can you make a series on manusmriti
Sir, very surprised with your prompt response. So nice of you.
Wish you too a happy and prosperous diwali🙏
❤️❤️❤️love from Toronto
🙏🙏
Nileshji, can the Kaam in Purushartha actually stand for Karma? It gives a different dimension to the meaning of Purushartha as Dharma-Artha-Karma-Moksha.
Step1: Dharma is supreme.
Step2: Understand the Artha (meaning) of Dharma
Step3: Orient your Karma (actions) towards Dharma based on this understanding
Step4: Once your Karma is oriented towards Dharma, it will lead you to Moksha.
Isn't this also what Shri Krishna says to Arjun?
Would love to hear your answer if you read this question. 🙏
Namaskar
You have given a beautiful and elegant interpretation of 4 purusharthas.
This is exactly what I understood from my childhood, is there any other meaning to it ?
Everyone should learn sanskrut...the word itself tells the mining..no further elaboration needed...dharma =duty, Arth= wealth, Kaam = desire, moksh= liberation. Even it's sequence is very important..it is again related with 4 aashram vyavastha.. Brahmachrya, gruhasth, vanprasth, sanyaas ..first gain gyaan (Brahma) do duty accordingly second gain welth according to dharma, now third loos all the desire of self according to dharma, and forth automatically u achive moksh...dhanyawad
@@amidave2153 Namaskar Amiji. Shubh Dipawali. I wish you all the best in your journey of learning Sanskrut, it is a wonderful quest. My connection with Saunskrut probably began in my previous human lives and in this life has continued for over 50 years now. One cannot grasp the depths of Saunskrut in one life time.
Some minor comments to what you have written. There is no concept of a "word" in Saunskrut. Word is a modern English term. Saunskrut originated with "sound", AUM obviously being the Pranava or primal sound. This is also why for millennia it was transmitted orally and not written down. Only oral transmission captures the sound, written text does not. Even the pronunciation can alter the meaning. The first sounds emerged from the Damru of Mahadeva. These are called Maheshwara Sutrani. Maharishi Panini took the base of the Maheshwar Sutrani, and then arranged them in his Ashtadhyayi. This is what we today refer to as the Varnamala or Saunskrut grammar.
The "sound" Purusha first appears in the Hrugveda Samhita in the Purushasuktam. In this suktam, Purusha is a reference to THE cosmic being. This is who we today devotedly personify and worship as Shiva. Hrugveda, as you may know, is "probably" the oldest of the Saunskrut texts. Chronologically Ramayan and Mahabharat happened later and this is where the "sound" Purushartha appears. The suktam is the baseline theory and artha is the meaning or explanation of that theory. Instead of interpreting it as man's quest for attaining material wealth and material desire, which has nothing to do with Shiva or Purusha, rather reorient your thoughts that it is finding the true meaning of the path that leads you to Shiva or Purusha, which is through Dharma. 🙏
So vastraharan happened, wrong title
You have explained so well and this will definitely change the outlook towards our Itihasa. I hope we will able to see truth though made up stories come forward. Thank you Nileshji!
What is Mr. Nilesh Oak's Take on Ashwatthama Episode ? What is his take on Chiranjeevi Hanuman and Ashwatthama ?
There are metaphors and symbolism - ways to express the bad, worse, and the absolute worst happened. If we're sensitive to understand the layers of meaning, we're all set to understand and learn from the epics - because, there certainly are learning points - of how to be, how not to be..what to choose and what not to choose - in Dharma. Choosing dharma over adharma.
Sir the details mentioned in all these references are not all that has happened in those incidents in those days
Unless the details mentioned in the references are considered as word to word Transcriptions
I always wonder how can someone say so surely as if they stood right next to them while the incidents / conversations are happening.
Happy and prosperous Deepawali Nileshji 🙏
🙏🙏
Are you from South
@NileshOak ji, I would like to read and interpret the Ramayan & Mahabharat from original Sanskrit text. However I find myself lacking the required Sanskrit language skill. May I request you to guide me where do I start and what is the optimal path to that level of Sanskrit knowledge. This question may have been asked before, and you may have traversed this path, hence the question Thank you in advance.💐🙏
Many things mentioned in Mahabharat and Ramayan were literally figure of speech. Down the generations since this is thousands of years old, people have simply taken these figure of speech literally.
For example-
1. Hanuman lifting mountain
2. Krishna lifting mountain
3. Hanuman gulping up sun in childhood.
That is your opinion not fact. fact is it's mentioned in the itihasa (this is how it happened) in history book Mahabharata 5000 years ago. our opinions if are against facts then those opinions and arguemtns are wasted. we will never know the truth as observable fact from the past. maybe there is god and he is omnipotent to incarnate and do all these. if he is not omnipotent then he is not god. according to these book there is god and he is omnipotent. logic only has 2 options in this situation either give up and accept the textual evidence as truth or skip these unsolvable questions as mysteries and move ahead.
Very nice case study...after this please make another case study on is draupadi wife of yudhisthir? Or of all five brother ?? Because with five brother this condition I m not digesting...so if possible please do...dhanyawad
Why are you all even bothered by it ?
If you have skipped telling to read repeatedly then the length of the video have been halved.
In Pop culture, based on BR Chopra’s Mahabharata, we already know that the vastraharan did not happen - thanks to Krishna’s grace but only an attempt was made. What’s new?
Sir but the sloka धर्मार्थ-काम-मोक्षाणाम्, उपदेश-समन्वितम् पूर्व-वृत्त-कथा-युक्तम् इतिहासं प्रचक्षते , is from Brihad Bhagavatamitra which was written in 16th century
Yes. And why is that a problem?
Please apki books Amazon me available abhi nahi hai kab Tak mil payegi।
If you are in India, you can order from Subbu publications. Com
one thing is for certain, the yadavas even after 12,209 years havent learnt to respect women😮
Both Kunti and Gandhari were very stron women, I don't think they would have allowed such humiliation of Draupadi, secondly the excuses given for inaction by Bhishma, Dronacharya, Vidur, etc are very feeble..
I remember it was something like it was her female nature protected her.. miracles can’t be taken seriously right.. like SriKrishna can’t lift the mountain, it must be like he became “protector of the area” by merging with Narayana consciousness(enlightened) on top of that mountain.. that too single pinky finger???… so what i read indicates something bloody floor from her PMS must have happened.. & no body can touch her in that state..
You need to cut the repetition of the point. Listeners who are plugged in, on such a subject are already of higher IQ, we don't need one idea to be presented in 3-4 angles . dissection of the scene is required but repetition of it 3-4 times gives it sense of soap opera scenes, where the story is stretched just to prolong it, suffice it into several episodes.
Well said
Best wishes for your views
Happy diwali 🪔
🙏🙏
Why did u mention a title such.. I don't understand.. U r justifying what we seen in t v serials.. 😊😅..anyways good.. Waiting for 2 nd part..
Apka bahut aabhar apne itna shram sadhy kary Kiya hai
Thank you.
What is the point of all this? BR Chopra’s Mahabharata is for mass audience so many of the events were dramatized for entertainment purpose. Vastraharan did take place, but not as dramatic or sensational as we have seen on TV or film. That is all.
Namaskar
Watch my other videos and/or read my books and blogs to see the point of all that I do.
What do you think stopped Dusshasana and made him sit down?
↓
Bro, there is no response for what didn't happen. 🌝 I think this interpolation is made to justify the death of the character of Karna _also called Vhrisha.
Is it pratikami or praptikami ?
I have C. Rajagopalachari's short english translated version of Mahabharat and it says "Prathikami" and he is also described as Duryodhana's charioteer, which can make sense because charioteers can always be present in the court where their masters are present so that they can be ready to obey their master's command at any time to set out to travel in the chariot.
Sir, u have immense knowledge, but here let us analyse the other way, yudishtar don't want war with anybody and he was ready to forego his kingdom, and here u pls note he is with tatva guna, and lord Krishna says when he comes for mediation that if yudishtara gets angry no fighting is necessary just his anger will kill anybody, and secondly yudishtar was not a gambler as said, he dont know how to play dice, several tv serials and pictures portrayed yudishtar like that. Further yudishtar was great of all others almost equal to bhishma or vidhur in knowledge.
Even if it did, what's the problem? There were bad people and mistakes made in all yugas. Why trying to rewrite everything to show some kind of perfection in ithihasa. After all it's a human story of human history. Why be bothered trying to revise itihhasa? People are denying Sita's agnipariksha too so that they can defend Ram as perfect. But why? Why should an avatar be perfect or why should these stories about their lives be perfect? Avatars after all have a human form which is an epitome of imperfection. Shri Ram came as a human being to experience the trials and tribulations of human life with its foibles. If he needed to be perfect, he neednt have had a human life and could have taken a disembodied Vishnu avatar.
🙏🏽🚩🪔🛕🪔🚩🙏🏽
It seems that to show the devinity of lord Krishna,this apisode might have been inserted later because King yudhisthir was not a foolish.When he himself was defeated in gambling and became das slave how he can wet draupadi? Any way every war on this earth was faught for woman booty or land.
परम आदरणीय आपकी किताब या इस प्रकार के प्रमुख विषय को मॉस में जाना आवश्यक है जैसे रामचरित मानस की मध्यकालीन काल में सनातन धर्म को बचाने में बड़ी भूमिका रही है । भजन मण्डलियो के द्वारा नायनार आतवार संत दाक्षिण भारत से उत्तर भारत में आम नागरिक भारत को उद्वेलित प्रेरित किया सो इस पर कुछ विचार करिए ।
My books are available on Subbu publications. Com, Amazon and also via bookganga.
So where did they get this story from?
Where did they get Bible and Quran story from?
Itihas
Yes. It did not happen..it was only attempted.
Correct.
And what do you think stopped Dusshasan and made him sit down?
@@NileshOak He was exhausted. Thats what I know. Bhagawan defeated his effort to disrobe Draupati.
@@NileshOak
What do you think stopped Dusshasana and made him sit down?
↓
Bro, there is no response for what didn't happen. 🌝 I think this interpolation is made to justify the death of the character of Karna _also called Vhrisha.
Yes, Dussasana didn't succeed in disrobing Draupadi. But I understand that initially Draupadi tried to defend herself but couldn't and finally prayed to Lord Krishna. Though Lord Krishna is omnipresent, didn't save Draupadi till the moment she gave up completely and prayed for Him.
Namaskar
Please watch all the episodes in this series.
Whatever has happened to Draupadi is wrong.
Maybe you're making up things to dissaprove the text which has been passed on for centuries, & according to the previous younger drayas event the ramayan date not match , and the most needed question how old are the yugas , you're just skipping this question , How old is kaliyug then and is kali yug again repeated continuously 2 times , since 12200- 5500 bce =6,700 dwapar yug age , and 5500 +2023= 7,523 kali yug age is greater than dwapar ?
this is the way of rss. they distort history not convey it.
Maybe you have been brainwashed for centuries don't learn from Congress dynasty family
@@PremSingh-ev4mo yea right as if your existence hold any value rss stooch. 5kg anaj aur 25paisa per comment ye teri kemat hai
Not sure what yuga theory has to do with the topic of this video? if you disagree with his thesis, then tell us with which points you disagree and why.
It is true. Look old sculptures
Who actually wrote Mahabharata and in which script. You say Mahabharata is 70000 years
Read my books for the answers and for correcting the misunderstanding.
Most likely the first and foremost written copy of Mahabharat was written by Lord Ganesha with his tusk as a pen, while Maharishi Vyasa narrated the verses to him. And the script is obviously Devanagari since the language written was in Sanskrit. For the timeline, I don't think Nilesh says that it is 70000 years old. It might be 7000+ years old given that Nilesh provides the date of the first day of Kurukshetra war to be 16th October 5561 BCE based on the astronomical hints given in the Mahabharat when the war started. This date based on astronomical references is something he provides in another video.
@@amazingcalvin Namaskar and Thank you.
BTW, the script won't be Devanagari (very likely) but that is irrelevant.
Again, Ganesha writing could be a metaphor and hagiographic addition, again irrelvant.
Nilesh yes you have good knowledge But asking 20 times to go and read the original edition looks arrogant and redundant. It looks like you want tell people you don’t know this. Don’t insult your listeners boss
I think you are a little arrogant that's the problem
He is right to say that. . people ask question without reading Mahabharata themselves.. I don't feel it's wrong anyway... He is just very straight forward
What is the point of saying that *"Vastraharan"* did not happen after explaining whole incident yourself 😂 except to draw viewers 😂. Good idea to increase views. ❤😉😘
Lost interest due to non interesting presentation.
Sorry Nilesh, you are wrong. Please do not extend your logic to actual happenings. I follow your logic and do appreciate your work but not your intention.
One question how often do the Astronomical events occur again and again. Say the planetary line up for Ram Janam. Does it happen every 65,000 years or longer.
Namaskar
What appears to be my intention as you understand it?
And another big misconception is that 5 husband's of Draupadi ji. Actually Draupadi ji's husband is one and only Dharmraj Yudhishthir.
provide verse number not opinion.
She did married five of them and yudhishthir was the one to prove that it's a valid marriage. Why would she marry yudhishthir alone when Arjuna was the one to win the competition.
The Mahabharata was first composed as a 8000 slokas, then it was enlarged to 32000 (?) slokas and finally after the Kurukshetra war it was enlarged finally to 100,000 slokas, when lots of manipulations took place, insulting the imperial Yadava tribe, criticizing them for greed and lust for power etc. Draupadi's Vastraharan is just a part of the diminishing effect to which the Yadava were treated in addition to insulting Krishna and Arjun and replacing the Sanatan religion with Semitic Hinduism by the Kuru (Turks) led by the Babylonians. In short superior Indian theology was manipulated to break the Indian spine from which the Indians never recovered.
That this Vastraharan didn't happen is part of the conspiracy by those who protect the Kuru/Hinduism against Sanatan by BJP/RSS promoting Hindutya.
Namaskar
Who is blurting out such stupid stuff?
Ask Mamta who defeated Modi/BJP/RSS and restored Puranic Goddess Durga and debunked Rama (Ramses II)@@NileshOak
New laws must be passed in India and across the globe that those who misuse the religious verses to spread their anti-dharmic opinions and political agendas/propagandas must be banned from the land to some island where all criminals will stay together in a prison in their stupid fantasy imaginary world for rest of their lifes.
@@sonarbangla8711pls keep politics away from scholerly work of Nilesh Ji. Arguments and counter arguments must happen with facts and reasoning only.
Why are Indians scared to face the facts and reasonings of the Kuru destroying the Yadava and massacring woman and children fleeing after the Kurukshetra war, why does the Indians abandon superior theology of Krishna's Sanatan religion and replace it with Semitic Hinduism? Why manipulate Indian scriptures to distort reality?@@rakeshtiwari1857
Mahabharat is a trash. I reject Mahabharat
I feel you..but I'm so sorry that u couldn't understand its essence... Try reading Bharathaparyadam by Kuttikrishna marar once,a study of Mahabharata
Ek tum log ho ki sab script chizo ko idhar udhar kar rahe ho ..