You are misinformed. You think they want to end the world right now? No. They're just letting us know. When you get to the other side of that is too late. We can do it too is no consolation. You will win what when your cities are rubble.
I live in New York, I am not worried at all about you MAGA lunatics, as an English Professor I can say confidently that Putin is just bluffing. Plus if he is not we have a massive civil defense infrastructure here and I am confident that I can survive said events should they unfold. We have to do the right thing and support Ukraine, we need to send them more money and push things further, we should probably draft the population into it as well. This mad man has to be stopped, I believe in democracy, it's wrong that a bigger country attacked a littler country.
Do you remember Charlie dagata? LoL the dude said Ukraine is in war in disbelief not too long ago, white people dont go to war, comparing it to Africa.
lol. you'll eat these words one day, maga. trump is not a dove. it's just a lie of his to get your vote. you still don't realize that everything trump says is a lie, yet, do you? and yeah, i'm not a biden supporter, and i didn't vote for harris, or trump, mark my words, loser. i bet you're one of those naive dorks who thinks there were NO wars during trumps first term. i know 335000 dead yemeni who would disagree with you. you maga are so sad and deluded and know nothing about politics or how the world works. i look forward to you regretting your vote...
"we" voted for what to be done with? Ukraine? You need to spell out your complicit undermining of the democracy being attacked by our biggest enemy mmkay? Cuz "WE" didn't vote for it: PUTIN did.
@Terryglendening7166 border states were always and will always be a red line for Russia. The US and allies know this. Furthermore, they will never allow themselves to be cut off fro their naval fleet in the Black Sea. If your are still of a hypocritical mindset, read about the Monroe doctrine and the Cuban missile crisis. Educate yourself instead of repeating pure ignorance that you overhear.
@GerardoALLO Who's his Russia to decide what a "red line" is in another sovereign state? F Thier red line... BTW, Cuba is still communist because we allowed them to remain so.
@@terryglendening7166Crimea was taken from Turkey decades ago and when Turkey asked Russia or take back or do your obligation to give back our territory what should Russia have to do? And Ukraine leaders pushed Russia until they got this type of war.
@@Birddawg45-46-4 If you don't understand how it directly affects the US, you are not informed on the issue. If Russia is allowed to take Ukraine, do you honestly think it ends there?
The long range weapons used on behalf of Ukraine will not win the war for Ukraine. It escalates the conflict unnecessary. There needs to be a peace agreement. The USA will not send our troops to fight and die in or behalf of Ukraine. The more Zelenskyy tries to drag us into his war, the less support I have for him.
US/ Nato troops not needed but more weapons. How do you know what escalations are unnecessary? How many of Putin's red lines have been crossed while you all are crying? So the more help President Zelensky asks for...the less help you want us to give? They are fighting for their freedom and their lives!
The US is trying to escalate as much as possible before 47 comes in. Is disgusting to watch. There is no justification for this front the biden administration. They just decided to escalate as an FU to Russia
@@brianpeck4035 Do you seriously believe that Russia will keep sitting back while the US provide weapons and intelligence to Ukraine to hit targets in Russia itself? How long before Russia tries to do the same to the US by providing weapons to countries and organizations that will use them against the United States? There are serious consequences to providing weapons to Ukraine that you might not have considered.
@@brianpeck4035 , we have given trillions to help him win the war or put him on better footing for negotiations. He refused a peace agreement and only esculates the war. I’m in the USA, it is not our war. We can’t stop nuclear weapons into Ukraine so he is only hurting his people on a war he can’t win. His escalation threatens to draw us into his conflict. Ukraine is not in NATO and doesn’t qualify for NATO. It’s time to stop the bloodshed.
I was surprised by the type of comments on a CBS post, it is obvious the true nature of the US proxy war with Russia. I feel bad that the actual Ukrainians and their country are being destroyed because their corrupt leaders have sold out to the USA.
Russia has *no right* to defend itself! It forfeited that right the moment its invasion of Ukraine was declared illegal by the UN. Moreover, under Article 1 of the UN charter, *every other* nation in the UN not only has the *right* to do whatever is necessary to stop Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but the *obligation* to do everything in its power to assist in the process of stopping Russia.
You probably don't know but nobody attacked Russia. Russia attacked Ukraine in 2022 and took 20% of Ukraine’s territory. If we follow your logic, do I have the right to hit you because I thought you could harm me?
They didn't say the main thing. The strike on Russian territory was carried out by British and US military personnel. The Ukrainian military was unable to use these missiles, since they do not have satellite tracking. This is direct aggression by the US and UK against Russia. Russia fired a warning shot. "Oreshnik", filled with nuclear warheads, can cause damage equal to two hundred "Hiroshimas" "The missile is quite modernized, good, with a range of about 6,000 km, with a separating warhead - 6 or 8, while each is capable of carrying a charge of hundreds of kilotons, which exceeds the total charge dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by 100-200 times. This was a demonstration of a blank that can be in a nuclear warhead. "Oreshnik" is already on combat duty.
@@lc285 It doesn't matter where Ukraine got them from last last year because this conversation is about who is launching the missiles. ALL countries involved recognize that that is an important distinction. But to answer your irrelevant question, the the storm shadows came from Britain and the atcams came from the US. Both are launched from Ukrainian platforms.
The US is never going to learn until a hard lesson is driven home. Why does the US give other nations a constant barrage of provocative actions? That is the most worrying thing.
Because the US was the one who led the negotiations to force Ukraine to get rid of its nuclear weapons. The main condition was that if Ukraine was ever attacked the US and other countries would come to their assistance. The Budapest Memorandum.
Russia invaded Ukraine first dum dum. Someone doesn't have a clue how the Soviet Union treated its countries poorly and how Russia constantly controls nearby countries in the hopes to expand today - no USA required.
@@ilttpvvm Be honest about reality and deal with it. Russia has the full spectrum from bullets to nukes. What can Ukraine be gifted that Russia can't respond to? Ukraine needs to stop pretending it can win while constantly whining and begging for support.
@@thejanssen6030 Pretending it can win? If a country had overwhelming force and was invading the USA would you "stop pretending it can win"? Would you give up Texas for peace? what other choice does an invaded nation have but to fight? They will have a bigger struggle, but no matter what Trump wants, Ukraine will not give up. They've been fighting Russia since 2014. Trump didn't end the war in 24 hours when he had a chance back then. Good thing he is surrounded by yes men so he won't get mad.
Could these "free news media" explain, how come Israil "not targeting civilians" end of life 20-100 civilians each attack and Russia "deliverately targeting civilians" end of life of 0-5 each attack???
Because US, Israel, UK and Ukraine are always mirroring the blame and crime. They always attribute their crimes to their opponents. And claim their opponent virtues for themselves.
The missile used was an Oreshnik (Hazel) experimental hypersonic intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) that strikes at Mach 10 speeds, making it impossible to shoot down. The IRBM used normal explosive munitions this time (bombarding a State Space Agency of Ukraine aerospace manufacturer called PA Pivdenmash in Dniper with deadly accuracy) but it could just as easily use nuclear munitions next time. This was a warning by Russia to the West that it's not bluffing. Sadly, DC loonies won't stop with this crazy escalation spiral until they see a mushroom cloud. They still think that they can stop this madness at the last moment.
Not really. This isn't very different from family members bickering with one another before and during the big style American Thanksgiving holiday. Then, most people make up and go to the big box the following morning for the discounted China style goodies. No NATO=No discounted items after Thanksgiving holiday! Many people like to make up and shop on this day and it is unfortunate that people in much of the world don't know that this is a big holiday. Without the day after Thanksgiving sales, then people wouldn't be motivated to be their true selves. Also, it is very unfortunate that Canadian people don't celebrate this holiday after their Thanksgiving, especially when they pay for NATO. I guess most don't really care to go shopping in the month of October.
Trump's idea of peacemaking is to hand Ukraine to Putin and Putin will annihilate them. And then we'll wait to see which country Putin invades next. Trump is Putin's stupid scared fat orange puppet 🤦🏻♀️
Russia didn't escalate. Russia responded to NATO and Ukraines escalation. Many people believe that the last week of NATO escalation may mean NATO and Russia are at war now. The issue is the new weapons Ukraine is using are largely directed by NATO. Ukraine just pushes the button, but the NATO countries that provide them put in the coordinates and guide them.
Mostly true, but the weapons aren't new for Ukraine. They got them last year. What's new is NATO authorizing their use into Russia instead of just within Ukraine. It's changed from defense to offense for Ukraine because NATO approved it
Know your history. People of Massachusetts are well known for fighting for freedom and sacrifice. People have lived on Martha's Vineyard since the Pilgrim days. Sorry if your understanding of History only goes back to Rupert Murdoch, or sadly, Joe Rogen. BTW. Boycott Thanksgiving next week. It's a Massachusetts tradition copied by the rest of the country.
... 😢 The USA, America calls it "Liberation" instead of "Invasion". That was what US call it in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and the list goes on... Why the double standard? Confused... Please enlighten. Genuine question... Instances of the United States "liberated" or overthrowing, or attempting to overthrow, a foreign government since the Second World War. (* indicates successful ouster of a government) China 1949 to early 1960s Albania 1949-53 East Germany 1950s Iran 1953 * Guatemala 1954 * Costa Rica mid-1950s Syria 1956-7 Egypt 1957 Indonesia 1957-8 British Guiana 1953-64 * Iraq 1963 * North Vietnam 1945-73 Cambodia 1955-70 * Laos 1958 *, 1959 *, 1960 * Ecuador 1960-63 * Congo 1960 * France 1965 Brazil 1962-64 * Dominican Republic 1963 * Cuba 1959 to present Bolivia 1964 * Indonesia 1965 * Ghana 1966 * Chile 1964-73 * Greece 1967 * Costa Rica 1970-71 Bolivia 1971 * Australia 1973-75 * Angola 1975, 1980s Zaire 1975 Portugal 1974-76 * Jamaica 1976-80 * Seychelles 1979-81 Chad 1981-82 * Grenada 1983 * South Yemen 1982-84 Suriname 1982-84 Fiji 1987 * Libya 1980s Nicaragua 1981-90 * Panama 1989 * Bulgaria 1990 * Albania 1991 * Iraq 1991 Afghanistan 1980s * Somalia 1993 Yugoslavia 1999-2000 * Ecuador 2000 * Afghanistan 2001 * Venezuela 2002 * Iraq 2003 * Haiti 2004 * Somalia 2007 to present Honduras 2009 * Libya 2011 * Syria 2012 Ukraine 2014 * 2014 - 2022 - 6 countries yet to verify. Pakistan 2022 * Haiti 2022 *
@@heatherhall7899he shouldn't have, and without even any official statement from the Whitehouse, whatsoever. It's insane what the people of this country allow.
Британия хоть куда лезет ???одна российская ракета может отправить под воду пол Британии неужели они думают что могут победить государство самым сильным ядерным арсеналом!Если бы Россия воевала так же жестоко как израильтяне убивая детей и женщин Украина давно была бы в руинах!Но Россия не еврейское государство тут ценят жизнь мирных жителей
The correct title is Russia tests a new medium range nuvlear capable hypersonic ballistic missile in Ukraine after U.S. and it's NATO allies fired missiles into Russian territory.
Notice the speed of these hypersonic missiles. Notice there was NO defensive missiles that responded. Russia sent a message that it can do the same with nuclear weapons if NATO countries continue giving and operating weapons that are aimed to strike inside Russia.
Russia is just a bully trying to take other people's stuff. They've been using the "crossing a red line" bit since the day they invaded. Russia can end all of this any second: get their armies back into Russia and out of another sovereign nation.
"But we have to remember, despite all the weapons, the artillery, Bradley's, tanks, F-16s; Ukraine is just outdone. The Russians haven't even called in its Air Force in any meaningful way..." Quite an admission he slipped in there. Knowing this, why do we make zero effort to communicate to prevent this from spiraling further? There aren't many wonder weapons left...
We should be very worried. Times have changed and eventually, no one is going to lend us money for wars. Our time as war mongers and genocide accomplices are over. Thank God for that.
Конфликт начатый разжигателями войны с запада и НАТО "принял глобальный характер". Полетные задания вводили в ракеты и на кнопки нажимали американские и британские военные.
@@Magmanic Да не надо повторять Путина, смотрите оригинал его выступления. Там станет многое ясно и про то что новая примененная ракета "Орешник" не сбиваемы так как их скорость сверхзвуковой. И это ответ на то что США вышли в 2019 году из договора по ракетам средней дальности. И конфликт начатый разжигателями войны с запада и НАТО "принял глобальный характер"(!) так как полетные задания вводили в ракеты и на кнопки нажимали 19 и 21 ноября американские и британские военные.
What part of inter-continental people do not get. Ukraine and Russia share the same border. It was a ballistic missile. You do not have to send a missile to space before it hits Ukraine.
I hope Russia leave ukraine glowing. Obama started the whole thing 8 years ago and Russia only answered the call for help from the Russian speaking parts of ukraine who have been shelled for many years by the ukraine government because they wanted to become their own country rather than joining the EU with the new government that obama put in place. Russia is the good guy in this conflict that obama started.
Funny how that works: when Albanians in Kosovo wanted to separate from Serbia, US, Germany rush to help them. They have a right to be independent, etc. It's democracy, they said. When Russians living in Ukraine wanted to separate from Ukraine and save themselves from harassment and daily bombing, US and Germany - you can't do that, you are part of Ukraine. You have no right to leave and be independent.
@@VadimH.-ms7dx I don't actually know. Oreshnik IRBM, the way they talk it seems it was only one missile, 6 warheads with 6 smaller in each warhead. It's a completely new system and I don't think anyone really understands how it works. Everything I've read seems singular, one missile....but yes there were clearly 36 flashes of light that hit the ground. Whether each one of those is considered a warhead, idk.
There were 6 explosions. Either there was one missile with a MIRVd warhead, or it was a salvo of 6 separate missiles. Please explain which scenario. 0:02
Tell the people the truth. The attacks were from NATO. The missiles used have to have data formulated, transmitted and loaded into the missiles by the US Defense Grid, which must be done by US personnel with the proper security clearances. That is why the Russians consider the attacks to be directly from NATO, and are responding according to their defense protocols. This Oreshnik strike was a warning shot to NATO to stop the escalation before it is too late.
That isn't explosion light. That's the glow from hot plasma around the warheads that just reentered Earth atmosphere and traveled to target at Mach10 speed. Warheads were blanks, no explosives at all, there's no smoke cloud from them. They destruction they created was due to sheer kinetic punch. The point from which this was filmed is pretty far away. The distance you see warheads travel in that split second is 1.9miles which is Mach10.
Charlie D'agata, remember in 2022 "relatively civilized, relatively European"; you lost your humanity when you dealt with the suffering of the people with your double standards.
Idiots, there's no North Korean troops in Ukraine or Kursk and it's not the Russian's losing 1200 soldiers a day it Ukraine! And today's missile from Russia was one of their responses for the recent attacks they have sustain.
NATO told Zelenski it was ICBM. Zrlenski has no clue. Shortly after nato changed its mind. Then. Zaharova anounced the same news, but received a phone call to change it to CBM. Hot line obviously worked.
"take the ukranians on face value" that us the word of a man who holds a position that gets paid over 1000 dollars PER MINUTE and we are expected to take some people we cant even see "on face value" a figure of speech that has no set definition but implies giving a person the benefit of the doubt..... Unbelievable.
What I’m failing to understand here is why does the type of missile actually matter? ICBM or not, why is this the talking point? Am I missing something? Can someone fill me in? I’m feeling a little stupid right now. Is it because ICBMs would be a step closer to a nuclear attack than a ballistic missile?
As far back as roughly 50 years several of Kissinger's books addressed ICBMs. Very simply, when such a missile is launched the opposing nation has little confidence of the target and no confidence as to its destructive power. Kissenger therein advocated immediate nuclear retaliation. Putin cannot be allowed to recklessly launch such missiles. Putin must be dealt with immediately and decisively.
It’s all fun and games until it gets bright at night…
It shows how US nuclear deterrence works. You can only fire missiles without warheads.
You are misinformed. You think they want to end the world right now? No. They're just letting us know. When you get to the other side of that is too late. We can do it too is no consolation. You will win what when your cities are rubble.
You mean for now @@ppen8359
okay Boris tell us more
maybe even very bright in the daytime too.
Thanks for the propaganda update CBS
Propaganda. Translation: News we don't like. ROFL.
@@FadeintotheShadowsWOW 😂 I remember them saying by the sharper than ever 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The truth only resurrects later on in war
Everything is propaganda as long as it doesn't agree with your propaganda.
@@Mr7c2ll No I disagree.I have observed what truth in journalism looks like in the past.. however few n far in-between moments
Straight from the mouth of a military industrial tool
Ending the era of western satanic rule
I live in New York, I am not worried at all about you MAGA lunatics, as an English Professor I can say confidently that Putin is just bluffing. Plus if he is not we have a massive civil defense infrastructure here and I am confident that I can survive said events should they unfold. We have to do the right thing and support Ukraine, we need to send them more money and push things further, we should probably draft the population into it as well. This mad man has to be stopped, I believe in democracy, it's wrong that a bigger country attacked a littler country.
Do you remember Charlie dagata? LoL the dude said Ukraine is in war in disbelief not too long ago, white people dont go to war, comparing it to Africa.
What did you expect nothing will happen?
Play stupid games ,get stupid prizes .
😂😂😂
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
Oh is it worrying? That’s a little bit of an understatement. We didn’t want this. We voted for this to be done with.
You voted for appeasement when it has been historically proven that appeasement doesn't work. Trump is a Russian asset.
lol. you'll eat these words one day, maga. trump is not a dove. it's just a lie of his to get your vote. you still don't realize that everything trump says is a lie, yet, do you? and yeah, i'm not a biden supporter, and i didn't vote for harris, or trump, mark my words, loser. i bet you're one of those naive dorks who thinks there were NO wars during trumps first term. i know 335000 dead yemeni who would disagree with you. you maga are so sad and deluded and know nothing about politics or how the world works. i look forward to you regretting your vote...
"we" voted for what to be done with? Ukraine? You need to spell out your complicit undermining of the democracy being attacked by our biggest enemy mmkay? Cuz "WE" didn't vote for it: PUTIN did.
That's why dude with the war stocks and bonds pulled this stunt
Trump did say that the was going to stop it before he's in office.🤣🍻🍿👈🏿💪🏿
Oh, you thought they were just going to take it without a response? Ok.
Russia attacked Ukraine. Was Ukraine supposed to take it without a response?
@Terryglendening7166 border states were always and will always be a red line for Russia. The US and allies know this. Furthermore, they will never allow themselves to be cut off fro their naval fleet in the Black Sea. If your are still of a hypocritical mindset, read about the Monroe doctrine and the Cuban missile crisis. Educate yourself instead of repeating pure ignorance that you overhear.
@GerardoALLO Who's his Russia to decide what a "red line" is in another sovereign state? F Thier red line... BTW, Cuba is still communist because we allowed them to remain so.
@@terryglendening7166 nato was cornering russia, did you expect them to take it without a response?
@@terryglendening7166Crimea was taken from Turkey decades ago and when Turkey asked Russia or take back or do your obligation to give back our territory what should Russia have to do? And Ukraine leaders pushed Russia until they got this type of war.
Like zelensky predicted. Missiles are now speaking for themselves.
We should make that slogan a T-Shirt.
I don't care about Russia or UKRAINE I care about our territory which is under attack🙄🇺🇸
Красавчик..
Genius 🎉
@@Birddawg45-46-4 If you don't understand how it directly affects the US, you are not informed on the issue. If Russia is allowed to take Ukraine, do you honestly think it ends there?
The long range weapons used on behalf of Ukraine will not win the war for Ukraine. It escalates the conflict unnecessary. There needs to be a peace agreement. The USA will not send our troops to fight and die in or behalf of Ukraine. The more Zelenskyy tries to drag us into his war, the less support I have for him.
US/ Nato troops not needed but more weapons. How do you know what escalations are unnecessary? How many of Putin's red lines have been crossed while you all are crying? So the more help President Zelensky asks for...the less help you want us to give? They are fighting for their freedom and their lives!
Так любой корабль с военными из сша буде потоплен.
The US is trying to escalate as much as possible before 47 comes in. Is disgusting to watch. There is no justification for this front the biden administration. They just decided to escalate as an FU to Russia
@@brianpeck4035 Do you seriously believe that Russia will keep sitting back while the US provide weapons and intelligence to Ukraine to hit targets in Russia itself? How long before Russia tries to do the same to the US by providing weapons to countries and organizations that will use them against the United States? There are serious consequences to providing weapons to Ukraine that you might not have considered.
@@brianpeck4035 , we have given trillions to help him win the war or put him on better footing for negotiations. He refused a peace agreement and only esculates the war. I’m in the USA, it is not our war. We can’t stop nuclear weapons into Ukraine so he is only hurting his people on a war he can’t win. His escalation threatens to draw us into his conflict. Ukraine is not in NATO and doesn’t qualify for NATO. It’s time to stop the bloodshed.
Как много адекватных и умных людей в комментариях, которые не хотят войны и понимают степень участия США в этом конфликте. У этого мира есть шанс!💙
When Trump gets in
I was surprised by the type of comments on a CBS post, it is obvious the true nature of the US proxy war with Russia. I feel bad that the actual Ukrainians and their country are being destroyed because their corrupt leaders have sold out to the USA.
Why is it a worrying response, what do people think the response was going to be ?
Vodka shots
Russia has the right to defend itself.
There was no tactical reason to fire on Russian territory.
🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
Russia has *no right* to defend itself! It forfeited that right the moment its invasion of Ukraine was declared illegal by the UN. Moreover, under Article 1 of the UN charter, *every other* nation in the UN not only has the *right* to do whatever is necessary to stop Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but the *obligation* to do everything in its power to assist in the process of stopping Russia.
You probably don't know but nobody attacked Russia. Russia attacked Ukraine in 2022 and took 20% of Ukraine’s territory. If we follow your logic, do I have the right to hit you because I thought you could harm me?
Russia started this and aimed at the innocents
They didn't say the main thing. The strike on Russian territory was carried out by British and US military personnel. The Ukrainian military was unable to use these missiles, since they do not have satellite tracking. This is direct aggression by the US and UK against Russia. Russia fired a warning shot. "Oreshnik", filled with nuclear warheads, can cause damage equal to two hundred "Hiroshimas"
"The missile is quite modernized, good, with a range of about 6,000 km, with a separating warhead - 6 or 8, while each is capable of carrying a charge of hundreds of kilotons, which exceeds the total charge dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by 100-200 times. This was a demonstration of a blank that can be in a nuclear warhead. "Oreshnik" is already on combat duty.
We have them to im America but we dont need to get to that point that’s irresponsible
💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
🤡@@kalebtyndell
@@kalebtyndell We have them in Hollywood you mean not we do not have them in IRL your dreaming wake up.
They have inertial guidance, they do not require gps sats ..
Everybody gangsta until Russia launches their RS-28 Superheavy ICBM.
Ukraine didn't launch missiles, but the british did.
What is that based on?
wtf
Who gave Ukraine the technology to fire the missiles?
bot
@@lc285 It doesn't matter where Ukraine got them from last last year because this conversation is about who is launching the missiles. ALL countries involved recognize that that is an important distinction.
But to answer your irrelevant question, the the storm shadows came from Britain and the atcams came from the US. Both are launched from Ukrainian platforms.
The US is never going to learn until a hard lesson is driven home. Why does the US give other nations a constant barrage of provocative actions? That is the most worrying thing.
Because the US was the one who led the negotiations to force Ukraine to get rid of its nuclear weapons. The main condition was that if Ukraine was ever attacked the US and other countries would come to their assistance. The Budapest Memorandum.
Is it because we're tired of idiots voting for trump and ruining the country?
@@jerlewis4291100% facts
Russia invaded Ukraine first dum dum. Someone doesn't have a clue how the Soviet Union treated its countries poorly and how Russia constantly controls nearby countries in the hopes to expand today - no USA required.
This is what they want to do before they get out of office
Maybe if Joe Biden had not escalated the conflict we wouldn't have to worry about Russia matching the escalation
JB is comatose. Question is, who escalated the conflict.........
Putin is the only person who has escalated. Putin invaded Ukraine in 2014 when Ukraine shifted out of the Kremlin's orbit.
Be quiet,you don't know what you are talking about.
@@johannesswillery7855Obama's in his Muslim bosses
@@markdegloria4038 so you vote for a guy who sucks off Vlad but Obama is somehow to blame? GOT IT
Why people are talking about north Korean troops. They are on Russian territory not Ukraine
Why are people talking.....etc.
Good luck to you.
No evidence has been shown that they are there. More propaganda. Check out interviews with Colonel McGregor and Scott Ritter.
What difference does it make HOW people are being killed? What do you really expect Russia to do?
What do you expect Ukraine to do?
@@ilttpvvm Be honest about reality and deal with it. Russia has the full spectrum from bullets to nukes. What can Ukraine be gifted that Russia can't respond to? Ukraine needs to stop pretending it can win while constantly whining and begging for support.
@@thejanssen6030 Pretending it can win? If a country had overwhelming force and was invading the USA would you "stop pretending it can win"? Would you give up Texas for peace? what other choice does an invaded nation have but to fight? They will have a bigger struggle, but no matter what Trump wants, Ukraine will not give up. They've been fighting Russia since 2014. Trump didn't end the war in 24 hours when he had a chance back then. Good thing he is surrounded by yes men so he won't get mad.
@@ilttpvvm Take the L for the good of the rest of the world.
@@thejanssen6030 🤣😂😂👎👎
Could these "free news media" explain, how come Israil "not targeting civilians" end of life 20-100 civilians each attack and Russia "deliverately targeting civilians" end of life of 0-5 each attack???
Because US, Israel, UK and Ukraine are always mirroring the blame and crime. They always attribute their crimes to their opponents. And claim their opponent virtues for themselves.
The Uncle Biden team pushes all buttons and the media says that russian leaders didn't have guts
Who knows maybe this is an imaginary world.
How many of you agree that ‘This is NOT a bluff’ of Putin.
The missile used was an Oreshnik (Hazel) experimental hypersonic intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) that strikes at Mach 10 speeds, making it impossible to shoot down. The IRBM used normal explosive munitions this time (bombarding a State Space Agency of Ukraine aerospace manufacturer called PA Pivdenmash in Dniper with deadly accuracy) but it could just as easily use nuclear munitions next time. This was a warning by Russia to the West that it's not bluffing. Sadly, DC loonies won't stop with this crazy escalation spiral until they see a mushroom cloud. They still think that they can stop this madness at the last moment.
You are typing the same message all over UA-cam videos Ivan
He is bluffing. He's desperate, needs help from North Korea 😂
@@solathelatestajalatravel6122 Good, sounds like you educated yourself already.
@@RG_SRQdo you think that only NK is helping Russia? They have a similar coalition to ours
💯
Wow this is pretty terrifying
It was terrifying when Russia invaded Ukraine.
I know. Did you see the damage to that sheds roof? WOW. Going to take days to repair
It is..though it’s seems to me most Americans are sleeping on this
I recommend watching cat videos in between stories like this
Not really. This isn't very different from family members bickering with one another before and during the big style American Thanksgiving holiday. Then, most people make up and go to the big box the following morning for the discounted China style goodies. No NATO=No discounted items after Thanksgiving holiday! Many people like to make up and shop on this day and it is unfortunate that people in much of the world don't know that this is a big holiday. Without the day after Thanksgiving sales, then people wouldn't be motivated to be their true selves. Also, it is very unfortunate that Canadian people don't celebrate this holiday after their Thanksgiving, especially when they pay for NATO. I guess most don't really care to go shopping in the month of October.
Keep poking the bear begging for a response.
Can we put Trump in now to put an end to this before it gets out of hand.
Trump's idea of peacemaking is to hand Ukraine to Putin and Putin will annihilate them. And then we'll wait to see which country Putin invades next. Trump is Putin's stupid scared fat orange puppet 🤦🏻♀️
Warmongering democrats acting surprised when Biden escalates. 😂🤣
Shouldn't have provoked Putin
Why so alarmed? Putin is bluffing, no??
Russia didn't escalate.
Russia responded to NATO and Ukraines escalation. Many people believe that the last week of NATO escalation may mean NATO and Russia are at war now. The issue is the new weapons Ukraine is using are largely directed by NATO. Ukraine just pushes the button, but the NATO countries that provide them put in the coordinates and guide them.
Mostly true, but the weapons aren't new for Ukraine. They got them last year. What's new is NATO authorizing their use into Russia instead of just within Ukraine. It's changed from defense to offense for Ukraine because NATO approved it
I didn't vote for any of this.
If you're gonna raise, don't be surprised when the other guy calls you.
It's a concept that didn't occur to them.
I hope the people of Martha's Vineyard are watching this... you'll see a Peace Proposal in no time if they know they're a target!
Know your history. People of Massachusetts are well known for fighting for freedom and sacrifice. People have lived on Martha's Vineyard since the Pilgrim days. Sorry if your understanding of History only goes back to Rupert Murdoch, or sadly, Joe Rogen.
BTW. Boycott Thanksgiving next week. It's a Massachusetts tradition copied by the rest of the country.
@@teleguy5699 "People of Massachusetts are well known for fighting for freedom and sacrifice"???
Who’s going to admonish the US state dpt for playing chicken with the worlds children
Trump
Bwhahahahahaha oh oh Bwahahahahahaha!!!!
There will be no one left to be admonished, or to do the admonishing.
Where is Biden? Where? How about Harris? What a joke.
... 😢 The USA, America calls it "Liberation" instead of "Invasion". That was what US call it in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and the list goes on... Why the double standard? Confused... Please enlighten. Genuine question...
Instances of the United States "liberated" or overthrowing, or attempting to overthrow, a foreign government since the Second World War. (* indicates successful ouster of a government)
China 1949 to early 1960s
Albania 1949-53
East Germany 1950s
Iran 1953 *
Guatemala 1954 *
Costa Rica mid-1950s
Syria 1956-7
Egypt 1957
Indonesia 1957-8
British Guiana 1953-64 *
Iraq 1963 *
North Vietnam 1945-73
Cambodia 1955-70 *
Laos 1958 *, 1959 *, 1960 *
Ecuador 1960-63 *
Congo 1960 *
France 1965
Brazil 1962-64 *
Dominican Republic 1963 *
Cuba 1959 to present
Bolivia 1964 *
Indonesia 1965 *
Ghana 1966 *
Chile 1964-73 *
Greece 1967 *
Costa Rica 1970-71
Bolivia 1971 *
Australia 1973-75 *
Angola 1975, 1980s
Zaire 1975
Portugal 1974-76 *
Jamaica 1976-80 *
Seychelles 1979-81
Chad 1981-82 *
Grenada 1983 *
South Yemen 1982-84
Suriname 1982-84
Fiji 1987 *
Libya 1980s
Nicaragua 1981-90 *
Panama 1989 *
Bulgaria 1990 *
Albania 1991 *
Iraq 1991
Afghanistan 1980s *
Somalia 1993
Yugoslavia 1999-2000 *
Ecuador 2000 *
Afghanistan 2001 *
Venezuela 2002 *
Iraq 2003 *
Haiti 2004 *
Somalia 2007 to present
Honduras 2009 *
Libya 2011 *
Syria 2012
Ukraine 2014 *
2014 - 2022 - 6 countries yet to verify.
Pakistan 2022 *
Haiti 2022 *
Who else loathes Obama, Kamala Harris, Walz, Biden, Jack Smith, Mayorkas, Schumer, Newsom, Schiff, Hochul, Willis, Fauci, Pelosi, Cheney, Hillary, AOC, Woke Hollywood, CNN, ABC, CBS, MSDNC, Facebook, google and UA-cam censorship:?
Waltz is cool tho
Its sad and truth that I do to now 😭
there is truth social, no one is making you use those platforms
Maybe Musk can build a special rocket and launch them deep into space. One way of course.
@@lorenzomena8613 Like Megatron tried to do to the Autobots
Ukraine is not the one who fired the missiles. ATACMS/Storm Shadow missile firing at extended ranges are operated by US/UK technicians.
Yes. And Russia knows that. Very upsetting. Why did Biden do this?
Yup. NATO is directly attacking Russia and the average American wears a Ukraine pin to support more death as they are so ignorant of the facts.
🤖
🤣😂😂👎👎
@@heatherhall7899he shouldn't have, and without even any official statement from the Whitehouse, whatsoever. It's insane what the people of this country allow.
Британия хоть куда лезет ???одна российская ракета может отправить под воду пол Британии неужели они думают что могут победить государство самым сильным ядерным арсеналом!Если бы Россия воевала так же жестоко как израильтяне убивая детей и женщин Украина давно была бы в руинах!Но Россия не еврейское государство тут ценят жизнь мирных жителей
BS
Solovyov is that you?
The correct title is Russia tests a new medium range nuvlear capable hypersonic ballistic missile in Ukraine after U.S. and it's NATO allies fired missiles into Russian territory.
Notice the speed of these hypersonic missiles. Notice there was NO defensive missiles that responded. Russia sent a message that it can do the same with nuclear weapons if NATO countries continue giving and operating weapons that are aimed to strike inside Russia.
So we should keep funding and helping this war until a nuke is in our back yard?
Maybe the US and NATO should stop crossing red lines and putting everyone at risk.
They've be doing that with Russia since 1989.
@@jaobidan2358 and they are tired of it.
Russia is just a bully trying to take other people's stuff. They've been using the "crossing a red line" bit since the day they invaded. Russia can end all of this any second: get their armies back into Russia and out of another sovereign nation.
Shovel's no worries
was burisma n money laundering worth it?
oh i forgot that russia subs are sleeping near the coast of US.. 😊
Sub are every where lol
"But we have to remember, despite all the weapons, the artillery, Bradley's, tanks, F-16s; Ukraine is just outdone. The Russians haven't even called in its Air Force in any meaningful way..."
Quite an admission he slipped in there. Knowing this, why do we make zero effort to communicate to prevent this from spiraling further? There aren't many wonder weapons left...
These were IRBM's designed for nuclear warheads. Warheads were removed. A "blank" nuclear strike... so to say....
Apart from that, it was programmed to hit a specific target.
They weren't long ranged ICBMS, they were newly developed hypersonic missiles.
Zelinski best not retaliate again.
Wy?
We should be very worried. Times have changed and eventually, no one is going to lend us money for wars. Our time as war mongers and genocide accomplices are over. Thank God for that.
Cry baby-west cryyyyyy
Lies Lies LIES
Конфликт начатый разжигателями войны с запада и НАТО "принял глобальный характер".
Полетные задания вводили в ракеты и на кнопки нажимали американские и британские военные.
Keep telling yourself that.
@Magmanic while you believe USA is the best military in the world 😂
@@Magmanic Да не надо повторять Путина, смотрите оригинал его выступления. Там станет многое ясно и про то что новая примененная ракета "Орешник" не сбиваемы так как их скорость сверхзвуковой. И это ответ на то что США вышли в 2019 году из договора по ракетам средней дальности. И конфликт начатый разжигателями войны с запада и НАТО "принял глобальный характер"(!) так как полетные задания вводили в ракеты и на кнопки нажимали 19 и 21 ноября американские и британские военные.
The war started by Russia, and Russians killed many woman and men and kids. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just stupid.
@@dragan3290 The war started by Russia, and Russians killed many woman and men and kids. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just stupid.
One air patriot defense system ask another next to it . What was that!
What part of inter-continental people do not get. Ukraine and Russia share the same border. It was a ballistic missile. You do not have to send a missile to space before it hits Ukraine.
I don't agree that it was an ICBM but yes, one can be used on the same continent. It just comes down much faster than ballistic
it looked like missiles taking off but played backwards
its an icbm but loaded an expiremwntal hypersonic missiles.. they just want to test their new tech shovel in ukraine
@@david020218 You are probably correct. Why would an incoming missile glow otherwise?
@@sgtsan6976 ICBMs go to space and US would notice that and confirm it immediately. This was fast but it was not 30 Machs like an ICBM.
No one explains and clarify us and uk personal strike, Ukraine is not able to find target, calibrate and shoot, please explain who understands
I hope Russia leave ukraine glowing. Obama started the whole thing 8 years ago and Russia only answered the call for help from the Russian speaking parts of ukraine who have been shelled for many years by the ukraine government because they wanted to become their own country rather than joining the EU with the new government that obama put in place. Russia is the good guy in this conflict that obama started.
Amen .....
Funny how that works: when Albanians in Kosovo wanted to separate from Serbia, US, Germany rush to help them. They have a right to be independent, etc. It's democracy, they said.
When Russians living in Ukraine wanted to separate from Ukraine and save themselves from harassment and daily bombing, US and Germany - you can't do that, you are part of Ukraine. You have no right to leave and be independent.
Saving lives is much more than you commenting weaponry. Preach peace
I don't find this any more worrying than them using any other weapon.
А что так ? Моя хата с краю - не чего не знаю . Когда на голову упадёт такая болванка , тогда задумаешься.
@YAMAHAF9.9JMH sorry I don't speak Russian. Perhaps you could try again using the universal language?
Love your propaganda. You guys are the best at deep state crap.
Could you elaborate on your statement?
They work for the military industrial complex @@alvieroach1368
@@alvieroach1368 you wouldnt understand the big words.
"Long-range" (Medium-range) - The Sensationalists.
Cbs has terrible reporting on this. I’m going back to twitter/x.
Biden, karma will get you
He can't EAR you. His toothy smile at their meeting was AWESOME. " Well hello Mr. gonna be neutralized. How you like me now?"
Biden ? Communism will get you .
Okay, buy bitcoin. You fight. I win.
That looked like rockets being launched in reverse
The target was the Yuzhmash aerospace facility. IRBM with 6 conventional warheads.
Since 36 warheads were clearly seen hitting it, I assume 6 missiles were used. Or maybe in non-nuclear variant there's 36 warheads?
@@VadimH.-ms7dx I don't actually know. Oreshnik IRBM, the way they talk it seems it was only one missile, 6 warheads with 6 smaller in each warhead. It's a completely new system and I don't think anyone really understands how it works. Everything I've read seems singular, one missile....but yes there were clearly 36 flashes of light that hit the ground. Whether each one of those is considered a warhead, idk.
Every news station shows the same footage its like standard background imagery when talking about this war
Wtf do you expect? Our weapons,our Intel and most likely our military helped in this offensive attack.
That be what escalation looks like
We need peace! This is crazy!
Nuclear war before gta6💀💀💀💀☠️☠️☠️☠️
There were 6 explosions. Either there was one missile with a MIRVd warhead, or it was a salvo of 6 separate missiles. Please explain which scenario. 0:02
its like lightning come from sky,, its terrible😱😱😱
Tell the people the truth. The attacks were from NATO. The missiles used have to have data formulated, transmitted and loaded into the missiles by the US Defense Grid, which must be done by US personnel with the proper security clearances. That is why the Russians consider the attacks to be directly from NATO, and are responding according to their defense protocols. This Oreshnik strike was a warning shot to NATO to stop the escalation before it is too late.
Kiev os about to get glassed.
I never thought same thing that fast powerful ever existed! Da heeell was thaaat bro ?!!! Just flushed out no f-king no where ?
Not month years they've asked for same peer to peer matching ammunition as Russia
Goodbye yellow brick road .
Non of them look like supersonic from explosion light
That isn't explosion light. That's the glow from hot plasma around the warheads that just reentered Earth atmosphere and traveled to target at Mach10 speed. Warheads were blanks, no explosives at all, there's no smoke cloud from them. They destruction they created was due to sheer kinetic punch. The point from which this was filmed is pretty far away. The distance you see warheads travel in that split second is 1.9miles which is Mach10.
Ukraine denying peace talks TWICE years ago is crazy. Rushing into Russia couple of months ago was wild. *Shake my head*
Nobody should be shocked by any amount of "escalation " at this point
what kind of ballistic missles carry mutiple warhead ,,,unless its an ICBM
The initial missile footage, looks like launching missiles in rewind at x2 speed .
This is a threat to the US
Try harder
Not even close, this is the type of information we are actually paying for with our support of Ukraine, unfortunately.
The US is a threat to the US.
Exactly!
It's only a threat if Joe Biden starts doing more stupid stuff..
Medium range
ICBM fired only one missiles with 8 multi warheads
FJB
thanks Biden and left media.
Charlie D'agata, remember in 2022 "relatively civilized, relatively European"; you lost your humanity when you dealt with the suffering of the people with your double standards.
Idiots, there's no North Korean troops in Ukraine or Kursk and it's not the Russian's losing 1200 soldiers a day it Ukraine! And today's missile from Russia was one of their responses for the recent attacks they have sustain.
NATO told Zelenski it was ICBM. Zrlenski has no clue. Shortly after nato changed its mind. Then. Zaharova anounced the same news, but received a phone call to change it to CBM. Hot line obviously worked.
"take the ukranians on face value" that us the word of a man who holds a position that gets paid over 1000 dollars PER MINUTE and we are expected to take some people we cant even see "on face value" a figure of speech that has no set definition but implies giving a person the benefit of the doubt..... Unbelievable.
So why are they worry? Ukraine began sending missiles sooo wth they expected to happen?
What I’m failing to understand here is why does the type of missile actually matter? ICBM or not, why is this the talking point? Am I missing something? Can someone fill me in? I’m feeling a little stupid right now. Is it because ICBMs would be a step closer to a nuclear attack than a ballistic missile?
Oh NO! Why did they do that???😧
It really doesn't matter. It's just a delivery system. Otherwise it doesn't matter.
Volatility in the frontlines? Rephrase that again, please.
As far back as roughly 50 years several of Kissinger's books addressed ICBMs. Very simply, when such a missile is launched the opposing nation has little confidence of the target and no confidence as to its destructive power. Kissenger therein advocated immediate nuclear retaliation. Putin cannot be allowed to recklessly launch such missiles. Putin must be dealt with immediately and decisively.
Zelensky is expert. How can you question him ? !!!!!
These are NOT long range missiles. 🙄
Liar!!!!