Men in Black’s Noisy Cricket is CRAZY
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
- Defending the planet isn't easy, but with the help of some advanced alien technology, the Men in Black have managed to keep the Earth safe from a variety of intergalactic threats. One of the most famous weapons in their arsenal happens to also be one of the smallest. As seen throughout the films, the Noisy Cricket packs a serious punch, but can science tell us just how powerful this tiny weapon is? Agent K suits up as he breaks it all down in this week's Because Science!
More science: nerdist.com/top...
Watch more Because Science: nerdi.st/BecSci
Follow Kyle Hill: / sci_phile
Follow us on FB: / becausescience
Follow us on Twitter: / becausescience
Follow us on Instagram: / becausescience
Follow Nerdist: / nerdist
Because Science every Thursday.
Learn More:
HYPERVELOCITY IMPACT EXPERIMENT: • Hypervelocity impact e...
NASA IMPACT STUDIES: www.nasa.gov/m...
Thanks for watching Super Nerds! For all the corrections about the kind of projectile the NC is firing, I'll see you in Footnotes. Also, the blue whale engine is now the Hill Engine (TM). -- kH
I need you to make the Hill Engine (TM) in real life Kyle. :)
I think I watched this episode but I can't seem to remember most of it.
Maybe I'm getting old, wait how old am I? What is this show anyway and what are you talking about?
WHO ARE YOU PEOPLE?!
kH? kiloHill?
So, OK, the projectile will vaporize in atmosphere. But what about the massive shockwave produced by the projectile before disintegration? You know, the same kind of shockwave that happened last time when one of the meteors vaporized itself into atmosphere before landing, partially or not. The same would happen, sure, we're talking about huge differences of mass, but the same differences of speed can be applied. And we all know that the kinetic energy produced is half of mass times velocity squared (1/2*m*V^2), so.... At least some glass and ears will be broken forever?
What is it launched lead or gold so that it would have more Mass so less speed
I always thought the noisy cricket was firing a wave of compression, like an amped up sound wave. Hence the name, 'noisy cricket'.
That is actually a good thinking
Honestly I thought it was like a photon blaster but the photons had mass that could cause an impact depending on objects in its path of travel (I know photons don’t actually have mass but this is movie science fiction we’re talking about crazier things have happened)
@@biggycheese5764 Photons have 0 REST MASS. They can still carry momentum. Hence the concept of light sails for space travel and the like.
@@kevspeedruns9947normally yes, but there was some research that managed to couple photons to form pairs and triples as a sort of photon ‘molecule’ and they behave like they have mass. I think the first research was done with ultra-cold rubidium atoms and a weak laser
Yeah i thought the name was a giveaway. If you could cause something to vibrate with enough intensity to generate and channel the pressure wave without feeling reverb or somethin. Like the frame was made outta "nth metal" maybe.
We need to measure more things in Whale.
It’s clearly the most accurate and scientific unit
zaczane no. toyota corolla is better
zaczane how about bald eagles per second
that scene gave me flashbacks to the Orion program style propulsion- NUKES.
It's a scientific unit Japan would be proud of.
Technically its the worst accurate unit as blue whales can be from 2.5ton when born to 150ton for adult males and 180tons for adult females so your unit of measurement has a possible range of 177.5tons
"Faster than ANYTHING ever fired on Earth!"
Nuh-uh! Watch this! *turns on flashlight*
Light isn't a projectile.
Or a physical projectile if you're getting technical.
@@firepower7017 Correct! Photons do not have mass, however we do see the result and source of turning on a light, and while the light from a torch (aka flashlight) may not be able to do much damage to a physical object, a laser can. So keeping in mind that photons do not have mass, would you consider a laser as a projectile? Also, all light has radiation.
@@ThePhoenix696 Lasers are considered as lasers, they don't fit the category of a projectile weapon if it only emits photons, not only that but it only causes burning if given the right intensity. Also flashlights usually involve a closed circuit of electrical current to emit light, so it doesn't radiate photons like of that of lasers. This can be easily observable to the range both a laser pointer and just a regular flashlight has.
Another problem is that you have to expose your target to a laser for a while because of heat transfer to the entirety of the body, not to mention we are made up of water making the burn feel like a intense pinch.
@@ThePhoenix696 Also projectiles by definition is usually referring the act of propelling a solid or liquid(You can kind of count gas as a projectile?) object towards something or somebody. So by definition and modern day usage. It definitely ain't a projectile.
So in conclusion, you cannot call lights or lasers other than "lights or lasers." Because they don't classify as a projectile weapon of any sort. And I do know all light has radiation.
"Humans are what we call...SquishyBendy."
So...Squendy? Or maybe, Bushy? Oh! I know!
Bishi.
(That time you make a bishonen joke no one will get.)
@@Deity1 i get it!
@@Deity1 I didn't get it.
I'm surprised he didn't go further into how the recoil would work, I'm sure firing anything with mass at 20% the speed of light, there would be no recoil forced into you at all, just a tiny gun sized hole running the length of your arm and out your back
@@Deity1 i got it it was okay
If I remember correctly, in one of the movies (and the TV show) they explain that the Noisy Cricket is actually a sonic projection weapon, that uses a narrow sonic radio wave to disrupt particles in a being or material and cause it to essentially shake apart violently and explode. So...technically, it shouldn't have any recoil at all because it's not firing a projectile or accelerating anything. It's an instant transmission of focused sonic waves. Still a great video though...
Yeah maybe it creates a big shockwave or sonic boom type thing as the energy leaves the barrel and that is what pushes Will back and not the actual recoil of the gun firing a physical projectile? Just thoughts
Energy still has recoil
dude you had me at "WHALE"
Whale
I have to pause it for my laughing fit. Lol.
Mach 1.2
1.7 actually
@@Goldmasterflex Super sonic attack whales.
I could be wrong, but I thought the Noisy Cricket was an energy weapon, not a projectile weapon. Would that change the outcome?
*Everything is energy?*
Yea same
it would have no recoil in that case.
Whatever it is firing must have SOME mass, otherwise the total momentum would be 0 or near 0 even if you shot it at light speed
Well they did a similar calculation for the deathstar having insane recoil despite being an energy weapon not firing matter, so even lasers carry momentum creating recoil
that depends on what you are referring to energy. if its charged particles then they do have mass. if its light, well, light don't have mass but it still have momentum, you actually can move in space with a flashlight as a thruster. the formula to calculate the momentum of a photon is p = h/λ (where p is momentum, h is plank's constant and λ [lambda] is the wavelenght).
2:14 "basically controlled explosions" is also how a car works.
I think its a gravity gun, it could magnify gravitational waves the same way we amplify sound. And with a proper shooting technique its effects could be counteracted by forcing the recoil into the ground similar to how boxers land blows. In short agent j had bad training
@@leonjohnson88 I think you mean no training.
How fast would that car go? Changing pistons for noisy crickets?
Because science: 'Physics is the same anywhere in the universe'
Singularity: I'm about to end this man's whole career
Singularity: I'm Going To Flip This Man's Space And Time To Make Sure That The Future Of His Career Is Guaranteed To End In My Core.
You don't really need Singularities for that. There are theories that postulate the laws of physics vary throughout the universe. After all, they're not really LAWS, so much as descriptions of what we can observe. Even then we're having trouble, marrying classical macro-scale physics with the weirdness of the quantum realm - and that's in our own cosmic backyard.
Still works the same way in/near black holes, we're just not sure exactly what hidden features the laws of physics contain that aren't noticeable except in such extreme conditions. Of course, physics in a black hole and physics in the rest of the universe would tend to bear little resemblance to each other, but they are still the same laws. Though, some of the more extreme ideas about what exactly happens beyond an event horizon (such as the possible existence of new universes inside of them) may change that, at least partially.
If the laws of physics don't seem to apply the same way to something, you just have the wrong or insufficiently general laws of physics.
@@sofieselene You realize you've contradicted yourself, right? First you said Physics "still works the same way in black holes", then later you said "physics in a black hole and physics in the rest of the universe would bear little resemblance to each other". So which one is it? Hint: it's the latter.
As to the last point, you're right. Our laws of physics are insufficiently general. Mostly because they aren't intrinsic properties of reality, so much as descriptions of what we can observe or calculate (limited as that is on a cosmic scale), and those same laws put a cap on how much we (as a species) will ever be able to learn - effectively barring us from knowing all, and thus creating a sufficiently general theory of everything.
Perhaps it would be better to say there are certain physical constants that current physics assume are immutable throughout the Universe. Constants - which certain, more fringe, theories assert - might not be as universal as we believe (speed of light included)
@@eviljesus84 It's not a contradiction to say that the laws of physics would bear little apparent resemblance. The same laws of physics can look very different depending on their context, but that doesn't change the fact that they are the same governing principles. Black holes, in particular, are rather extreme examples and are largely unknown, but they do indeed obey the same laws of physics as everything else. We simply don't yet understand *what* those laws of physics are yet, due to the fact that the laws of physics we've discovered so far are not directly applicable to extreme environments.
And yes, it is indeed assumed that various physical constants are, indeed, constant and universal. They most likely are, though, as no measurement of either those constants in a lab or in two causally separated regions of space have yielded a different result. If the constants are changing, it's at an absolutely glacial pace, and they've likely changed only a tiny amount since the dawn of the universe.
Reminds me of the weapons in Mass Effect. They use element zero to accelerate a small chunk of inert mass to hyper velocities instead of traditional gunpowder/bullets. Since they're useing only a small mass but extremely high velocities, they have devastating effects at impact. The ONLY part missing is the effect these hyper velocity rounds have on the atmosphere around the projectile when fired. You can see from the US Navy rail gun experiment, that firing a bullet at such speeds nearly creats a fusion reaction of the air molecules as they can't get out of the way and the bullet creates a stream of plasma in its wake
It sheers off a piece of metal and fires it at hypersonic speeds. The lore in Mass Effect was very interesting to me.
So that’s why it’s called Mass Effect
I can't wait for the whale engine mod for Kerbal Space Program to come out of this.
Well we already have the Farscape 1/ hetch drive and GN drive mods on KSP.
it happened everytime free willie got released in the 90's
"Whale! Whale! Whale! Whale!"
*Looks down*
*Shocked Pikachu face*
xD
I was scrolling through the comments section specifically to find this...you have made my day! I freaking lost it at that part, lol! 😂🤣🤣
Yes! I was hoping I wasn't the only one to love that part! I lost it when Kyle said that, coupled with the animation and whale sounds!!😂😂🤣🤣
Why it feels like i've seen this episode like 20 times before?
only 20?
-Beeeep *flash*
@@cristhianmlr Oh look, a new Because Science video!
He should totally reupload a slightly edited version of this tomorrow and every day until the joke stops being funny.
*B E C A U S E S C I E N C E*
"But of course, we know humans are not perfect spheres"
Are we certain of this?
Tess Holiday says hello.
Nikokado avocado is the prime example of us being spheres
I consider kirby a pink, tiny human.
@@user-ud4jv bruuuhhhhhh best comment i've seen all week lmaooooo
I mean, my mom was close but she still had arms and legs.
4:02 There, a replay button for one of those... golden moments :D
4:14
Kyle: 0.20 c is faster than anything ever fired on earth.
LHC: Am I a joke to you?
Nice 👍🏻
*anything except sub-atomic particles
earth Prime maybe...lots of others across the multiverse
LHC is not "on" Earth :)
I smell some footnotes
The MiB cartoon from the 90's shows that their suits contain technology which absorbs most of the abuse they encounter. In fact they can even survive falling into lava.
Why would you assume it fired a projectile when all the other weapons fired energy bolts? I figured it to be a force projecting weapon.
Pretty sure it's a sonic cannon. The name gives it away 'Noisy Cricket'. Crickets make noise by scraping their legs together, which you can hear for quite a distance. Whatever is 'scraping' inside the Cricket when the trigger is pulled is a highly focused, but INTENSE source based on how much noise it makes. Enough that, when directed like a vortex cannon, can blow stuff up or shred it.
@@Kalebfenoir that would explain the massive hole in the truck, the shockwave would expand outwards as it moves.
@@aidenaune7008 it depends on how tightly focused it is. Theres vids of regular vortex cannons that have ends about the size and shape of a 5 gallon jug sending whats basically a ball of condensed air into a brick wall and blowing it out in a roughly circular pattern.
The cricket is much smaller with a pinpoint end, but whatever it generates inside creates enough distortion to blow out the side of that truck on impact, but not sweep the street clean of cars like a Shockwave blast might. Its a shaped-charge blast of concussion force that probably loses strength and cohesion the further it goes...and it only lasts a second or two. So it dissipates quickly.
Energy firing weapons do not have recoil. They do not fire projectiles with any mass, so the quantum of movement does not change. If there is recoil, you can assume a projectile with some mass was fired
@@Pedro38906 actually energy weapons probably would, there's even a video about it. One other Death star flaw. It's just minimal.
The editing and delivery is incredibly hilarious 11/10
I could've sworn, mostly based on the name, that it was a sound-based weapon. Wouldn't that be an entirely different equation?
I thought it was called noise cricket cause it makes a annoying sound like crickets and its small but I could be wrong
You are partially correct. We know it's not purely based on nothing but sound because when J first shot it, there was a path of fire leading from the store to the truck. The second time he shot it, there was a small explosion (we didn't see any fireballs but that's because he just hit the thin cable that was holding the van). The third time he shot it, he hit the trailer of a semi and there was a huge fireball explosion. A sound-based weapon wouldn't leave trails of fire or cause fireball explosions. It's possible that it uses soundwaves to fire the weapon itself. The chirping sound we hear are soundwaves building up in pressure and then when that pressure is released, it fires out some sort of projectile. That would be a perfect example of why the gun has such a huge kick to it. All that pressure building up and then finally releasing.
So I guess, in a way, it's a combination of a sonic and projectile weapon. But Kyle would then need to figure out how much pressure would be needed to throw J backward so far.
could be alled that because it breaks the sound barrier.
I'm no physicist but here's my theory. The weapon is neither sonic or a physical projectile in the traditional sense, look at the almost needle like tip of the weapon. The "projectile" is quantum mechanical probably just one intensely charged muon or quark.
Fergil The Fox I always thought it was laser/energy based.
I always assumed the noisy cricket was firing some kind of concentrated sound way
Makes sence with the name. But at the same time it looks more like plasma or some type of physical energy in the movie.
I always thought it was some classic sci-fi energy ray-gun.
"fresh prince of bel-airtime" is the best pun you ever made
I suspect he started with this pun, and worked the entire video around it :-)
Ladies and Gentlemen, that's a wrap. We're done here. Humanity has peaked; for nothing else can possibly top this.
The book M.I.B.: Green Saliva Blues contained 2 paragraphs talking about the Noisy Cricket and, more importantly, how to hold it. Extend your arm to it's normal, relaxed length, bend your wrist at a 90° angle, extend your pinkie and fire at will. Firing it like this seems to indicate that it fires not with a recoil but a backblast that can be avoided by simply sidestepping it.
I have personally always assumed the noisy cricket was some sort of sonic weapon where it affects the air not firing a projectile
that is what I thought, the "recoil" is actually just air expanding in front of you
@@danilooliveira6580 perhaps caused by gravity wave...??
@@sleepingbackbone7581 there is no reason to go that far, gravity wave that can push you back like that would probably rip you apart. it can be just air pressure or thermal expansion.
Kyle: "Physics is the same everywhere in the universe"
Me: Even in a black hole?
Kyle: ".... Not fair"
Black holes don't break physics, we just don't fully understand the interactions because of the gravity.
Ban is my personal favorite. At first for me it was King but after watching his backstory I really felt for the guy. I know this is no where near relevant for the topic that is being discussed but whatever.
How do we know that the interior of a black hole is in the same universe as the exterior?
@@henrynorcrossii3363 Occam's razor I guess.
Henry Norcross II
This sounds like a reference to cosmic evolution theory...which is where black holes form and create new universes on the other side with altered/evolved physical laws. Honestly this theory is entirely a way to get rid of the problem of the singularity (the beginning of the universe). It makes more sense to explain the singularity with some intelligent force outside our universe I.e. God, aliens, a computer program etc... But atheists have chosen a philosophy where this is impossible. The truth is and will likely remain, we don't know. As for physics with black holes, they don't break laws. Things like time and space, physical dimensions, may not be comprehensible in such a place but energy is still conserved. We don't even know if black holes have an inside or go somewhere. The problem is with observing them and since our ability to observe things is greatly related to radiation bouncing around, black holes become problematic with the radiation trapped by the gravity.
Correction: I think the name is telling and it fires powerful sonic waves not projectiles
I remember in the series that it fired some kind of energy.
I'd agree, but can sonic or even super sonic waves cause the kind of damage it does in the first movie? Where are those small explosions coming from?
ua-cam.com/video/fTqxFIpc1j4/v-deo.html
I always thought it fired like an energy/plasma and not an actual projectile...
raygun
It's a sonic gun, the name gives it away, "noisy cricket". Crickets make noise by rubbing their legs together, so the noisy cricket probably makes an intense scrape inside of it that is very focused
Yeah I don't that spike is a barrel
Same
I always thought that the noisy cricket was a gravity gun. It creates a super dense gravitational spot (possibly similar to a mini black hole), then releases it in a singular direction. All the gathered matter in that instant would than follow normal physics meaning it creates the backwards force (recoil). Would also explain the lack of a means to reload and the tiny extended tip of the weapon. I wonder if there would be any negative effects to generating a temporary microscopic black hole 2' from your body?
Maybe the projectile created a sonic boom that knocked Smith back. Also never stop asking awesome questions.
So, you could in theory make a rocket jump in tf2 style with the noisy cricket?
You could actualy go to the international space station with this methode
@@fixo5132 you can achieve the same by finding a giant in the wild.
I was thinking about how if the projectile was made out of steel or really anything earthly it would basically instantly vaporize. Then you said that at the end. Keep up the great work!
and for this reason he got a silencer in the MIB animated show
word?
5:04 if the diameter is 2mm, the volume of a spherical projectile would be (4pi*0.001^3)/3=roughly 4*10^-9 m^3.
With a volume like this, the density that would result in a mass of 4mg would be (4*10^-6)/(4*10^-9)=10^3kg/m^3, which is the density of water. Thus, your estimation of 4mg is correct only when assuming that the projectile has a diameter of 1mm, because the volume would be 1/8 of the volume that you get with a diameter of 2mm, and the density of steel is roughly 8 times the density of water. So the mass of the projectile would be, according to your assumption of a 1-2mm diameter, somewhere between 4mg and 32mg (actually a bit more than these values since I rounded pi/3 down to 1)
I found a simplified formula for Ballistic gelatin penetration not accounting for deformation of the projectile based on the velocity, diameter of the projectile and density. I couldn't find official dimensions for the noisy cricket, but compared to a similar sized pocket pistol, I'm estimating that the average diameter of the noisy cricket to be 80mm with a density of 1.54 g/cm^3. Based on your assumption of recoil momentum at 240 KG m/s. It would recoil out of Will Smith's hands at a velocity of 500 m/s. Launched at this speed, the ballistic gelatin penetration would be 154.56 inches. Not accounting for the Noisy Cricket deforming and breaking on impact with his chest. That's enough to rip out of his hands and blow through his chest. And if after deformation and breaking transferring energy into his body, it maintained only 10% of it's speed on exiting Will Smith, pieces of the noisy cricket would be found about a foot to two feet behind him.
Now that I’m thinking about it… the distance is under the assumption of the ballistic gel penetration.
Maintaining 10% of it’s speed it would still be traveling at 50 m/s and travel a lot further than just a foot.
Kyle looks really similar to Agent H but with long hair
He is discount Thor.
I swear I see u everywhere
hmmmmm -- kH
Because Agent H is Thor from another universe, and I always say Kyle looks like Thor
Would relativistic speed leave a hypersonic boom in the projectiles path?
Drkwll Yes.
Since it has to accelerate through the speed of sound first, you'd have a sonic boom. Also any object that travels above the speed of sound in the medium leaves trail of sound (usually very loud) if it's aerodynamic coefficient isn't 0 - which means it would be totally silent, since it doesn't lose energy to the air, which is what makes sound. But since such objects (materials) don't exist - and somehow I don't think they can exist (the closest thing that comes to mind is Bose-Einstein condensate, which supposedly has viscosity of 0 - though I might have screwed up something given that I learned it in another language, also super-conductors have minimal or 0 resistance, so these are analogous situations, but not the same).
@@jannegrey593 How about supersolids?
It would probably rip his thumb right off, I mean the digit that goes all the way to the wrist.
I wonder if it would also ionize the air making absence of flashy effects unrealistic
I always theorized that that "noisy cricket" was originally a vehicle-mounted weapon for really small aliens (Arquillian, perhaps), refurbished into a handgun.
You're concerned about what the impact and reaction damage would be, I'm concerned about what damages that projectile would have just in the general area when it's going that fast.
I'm still thinking that the Noisy Cricket's "barrel" is really just an ionization antenna, super-heating then directing the local atmosphere.
The force applied is not only from directing the super-heated plasma, but also from the expanding atmosphere caused by the suddenly heated air. See also: Thunderclaps.
(The *really* noisy cricket...)
I honestly have always wondered about how powerful the Noisy Cricket is in the first movie. It was also the first VHS I ever bought for myself and I still have it.
So, I was thinking on this.. When the recoil hits, it impacts all of J, rather than just his hand. In theory, if the recoil acted as you'd imagine, his arm would jerk back and he'd either break his own nose, or be thrown back by that point.
So what if doesn't discharge like that? I'm BS'ing around with alien tech, but I'm going to assume it's a liquid or energy that reacts on oxygen. So when it leaves the barrel the reaction happens and that's the take off point, which creates a small boom and flings him back. That's kind of the only logical answer I can think of to have the backlash act like it does.
because science
That also could explain why in the animated series when he adds the silencer the knock back gets controlled ( the silencer was a large barrel)
The explosion would probably shatter nearby glass and definitely rupture his lungs and other organs. But a fun thing to think about
7:00 fastest thing fired is a manhole cover afaik
I have a question:
Do you draw everything backwards or is it all done with the Mafia of editing?
Editing, he said that on one of BS Live
Turn your self phone camera to selfie mode and point it at someone writing on glass to see how it’s done.
They just mirror the image. I noticed in one of the older episodes he was wearing a shirt with a pocket on it and when there was writing on the screen the pocket reversed the side of the shirt it was on
Wouldn't a weapon like that have so much recoil that it would just slip out of your hands and go through your chest.
Probably, but I'm thinking it would more likely slip through your hand and into/through your chest. So, good job MIB. You made a weapon that vaporizes it's projectile before hitting the target along with snapping off your agent's thumb before embedding itself in his chest. At least he's already dressed for the funeral.
that's why you need a good tailor beforehand
kyle : ah finally the research the things i need
and then his memories just got deleted
Hi Kyle, love this show
One small correction: the conservation of momentum happens in every collision, and most of the time some energy becomes heat. When you also have conservation of energy, this is a "completely elastic collision" and there is another formula to describe that (this formula comes from the conservation of energy and conservation of momentum).
"Our Values are Under Attack!!!"
is probably one of the most conspiracy-like Things one can say,
and yet, for Science, it's literally true.
As Professor Dave in his epic video about the Discovery Institute
and it's members showed: Yes, a lot of people are just being salty about not having had the Best Grades once... but some are doing Science-Denial delibaretely.
Many Science- and Atheist-Channel talk
about Science-Denial.
Ok, a few thoughts I had from this episode:
1) The noisy cricket would be in interesting propellent for someone traveling in space.
2) Bit of a nitpick here: Proper weapon handling stance is important when firing high recoil weapons. The shooter braces their joints and musculature to absorb and redistrubte recoil through the body and into the ground. If a proper stance is not used the weapon will either knock the person down, or fly out of their hands. There are videos online of this.
3) Good video, keep it up!
I always assumed it was an energy weapon, not a projectile one. Looked like it had a power gauge or battery on it.
Somehow I think photons still have momentum
@@insylem yes, but only in very large quantity and in extremely concentrated beam (death star anyone?)
I always imagined the Noisy Cricket was some kind of sonic weapon that create a huge pulse when fired and that's why Ajent J is thrown back
Have fun blasting out your ear drums shooting it then lol. Sperm whale clicks can pretty much cook you alive because they are so loud
@@dudemanbroguy3464 sperm whales are that loud ?
My theory is that it's some kind of hyper-advanced gravitic or plasma weapon. Either firing a 'sphere' of distorted gravity which threw you backwards as normal gravitic fields reasserted themselves in its wake, or firing highly compressed, highly energized plasma enclosed in a rapidly dissipating EM shell that caused a shockwave that caught you and hurled you backwards as all the air that made contact with the contained plasma through the EM field basically...detonated. The plasma being too small to roast everything in it wake, but once it hit something and the EM shell dispersed, absurd damage being done.
Both techs would require grotesquely more potent energy storage than we've got, but hey, the noisy cricket apparently comes from a species that's got FTL travel and communications developed. So they could very well have discovered some outlier in physics that let them contain the equivalent of a year's output of a nuclear reactor in something the size of a watch battery (that you would never want to break open).
1. what exactly is a "sphere of distorted gravity" supposed to be? And why would gravity "reasserting itself" throw you backwards, when Earth's centre of gravity is "below"?
2. why would anyone build a weapon, the projectile of which starts exploding the moment it leaves the barrel, potentially hurting the operator in the process?
3. if the plasma projectile was "too small to roast everyone", then why would it losing containment on impact suddenly make it so destructive? Hot or not, it's still a tiny ball of ionised particles in Earth's atmosphere, and so should dissipate almost immediately.
All in all, your explanations sound quite scientific, but mostly in the way a Star Trek episode does.
P.S. saying "highly compressed and energized plasma" is basically a tautology, since it's an ionised fluid that requires high pressure and temperature to create. So it's "compressed and energized" by it's very nature.
If memory serves me right, it does actually show the damage the noisy cricket had done in that same scene where we see the fresh prince get sent flying backwards.
Hey Kyle, great episode as always. One thought on the whole recoil thing, there are videos out on YT that show people firing large caliber, high powered guns getting knocked back or knocked down by the recoil. So it may be possible for the Noisy Cricket to do the same thing.
Super condensed sound waves, pretty sure that is covered in MIB lore.
I don't think its sound waves, we never hear the sound of the noisy cricket firing and only hear the explosion of what it hits. It probably fires a laser of something and we just don't see it.
@@psychetitan3529 not all sound is audible to the human ear.
Dang it! I was typing the vaporization of the projectile as you mentioned it. Ill never make it on foot notes. Next Time Because science!! *voice of Doctor Claw*
Inspector Gadget! Ooo ooo ooo ooo!
I always assumed that the cricket was some kind of concussion/ shock wave device, that's why it was called noisy cricket. Kind of like a compressed air blast seeing how it quickly spread out from the end of the gun making it a great short range weapon but a lousy long range as the shock wave would weaken as it got further away.
So Kyle. I think we are not dealing with recoil here. What I theorize is that what many assume to be recoil is in fact a pressure wave caused by the propellant of the "projectile". I think that the noise of it charging up is the charging of particles near the "Barrel" and that when it fires it causes a small but powerful implosion outside the gun followed by a focused explosion that fires a charged particle cloud in the direction away from the shooter. However the implosion and then explosion becomes a wave of pressure in a spherical area that knocks the shooter off their feet. In essence the noisy cricket is a particle projection canon. There is a "Silencer" for it that removes the "Recoil" but reduces it's power. The loss of "Recoil" is because it contains the implosive/explosive force and channels it forward, but provides a smaller area for it to gather particles, so reduces it's power.
I always assumed that the cricket was a sonic weapon
Noisy cricket was a weapon that fired concussive blasts.
A magnum revolver can be painful to fire (from what i have seen, never fired a gun) and this is smaller, and more powerful, now that would be painful
Could the noisy cricket be a rail gun if so it could explain the pinpoint accuracy and immense amount of recoil?
Yes it could look for my comment for a deeper thought of how it might could work
What if it's actually just an LTD for some kind of orbital weapons system?
Since the noisy cricket is alien technology and it's obviously not designed for human hands, would the aliens who created it be small enough to hold it normally? It's mind blowing thinking how this gun is a feasible technology developed by such a small species.
Or mabey it was just designed to be compact but deadly.
@@matthewdavis363 and barely functional in human hands...
I think you've started with the wrong assumption. The Noisy Cricket (tm) is not a projectile weapon. Both from the name and the sound effect in the film, my friends and I have always assumed it was a sonic weapon. Sound can produce thrust. Just put a lit candle in front of a large speaker and you can see there is an air flow away from the speaker. Also propagating waves in water create a small flow. NASA is currently doing research on creating thrust using acoustic waves in the plasma environment of the solar system, see "The Potential for Ambient Plasma Wave Propulsion."(www.nasa.gov/offices/oct/early_stage_innovation/niac/gilland_potential_ambient.html) It should work even better in an atmosphere. Really large amplitude sounds can do serious damage, hence the sound suppression used in rocket launches.
The thrust doesn't have to be instantaneous because there is an amount of time between when Agent J pulls the trigger and when he lets go; almost 2 seconds from the beginning to end of the sound-effect in the film and he is airborn about half of that. It's not much, but it should reduce both the power requirement and the acceleration force on J's body.
But, From my back-of-the-envelope calculation given 3mm flow area and exhaust velocity equal to the speed of sound at sea level; to move 87 kilograms 5 meters in 1 second would require an air flow of around 41,000 psi coming out of the Noisy Cricket; i.e. 2,800 atmospheres. In order to push Agent J like it did, it would do more blow a hole through both sides of an exterminator truck. The expanding shock wave cone would flatten buildings.
Assumptions:
Effective velocity 5 m/s
Flow area at nozzle 3 mm²
Mass loss rate 0 lb/s (no fuel mass consumed)
Ambient pressure 101.33 Pa
Pressure at nozzle 41,248 psi
Thrust to move 87 Kilos .8531829 kN
....(looks at a bottle of alcohol that is within arm's reach for a few seconds) oh dear my god need to flash the dam hell out of me twice over for this info
The Noisy Cricket™ is one hell of a gun
If this comment doesn't get the SUPERNERD award in the Shownotes I'll be very surprised.
I've seen MIB, but a long time ago, but if you remember, he gave his brand new partner a weapon that was non lethal, but still really powerful. He wasn't ready. So he didn't know how to adjust his stance. He had never fired one before. So naturally he got blown backwards.
I know you've already done the follow-up, the projectile vaporizing itself upon firing would actually fit within the design/canon; the noisy cricket doesn't seem to have a projectile, instead appearing to disintegrate objects with a super-heated shockwave. They might need to add a handwavey 'inertia focuser' to make it not obliterate everything in front of him, but it does make movie-logical sense.
Your shirt was blue in the immortality videoooooo
Your brand is strong -- kH
@@becausescience Must never forget!
A great example of the squishy bendy aspect is shooting a shotgun from the shoulder vs the hip. From the shoulder you just kinda bend back a bit but from the hip (the butt not supported on your body) it feels like it's trying to rip itself out of your hands as if someone whacked it with a sledge hammer
One thing not mentioned in this video. if you ignored the fact that it would likely vaporize and just think about a small piece of metal moving that fast it would just go through whatever it hit without doing hardly any damage to it. It would just poke a hole in it the exact size or very close to the same size as the object.
Kyle :'because physics works everywhere'
Quantum mechanics : 'hold my atoms'
Ps i could be wrong but that's wat first got in my mind. But hey if i am wrong then i learned somthing new n.n
Sorry if i spelled somthing wrong. English is not my first language.
Btw love the show
*Hold my Subatomic particles?
You didn’t really spell anything wrong as far as I can tell but I might have missed something also yea physics work no where
Quantum mechanics is weird, and doesn't seem to gel with classical mechanics terribly well, but they are both part of modern physics. So as long, as they remain constant throughout the universe your argument is invalid. That being said, there's actually no proof that they do. In fact, there are certain theories that state laws of physics and so-called "physical constants" may actually vary, depending on where you are. So while your example isn't exactly right, neither is Kyle necessarily.
Here's a deep cut: in one of the tie-in novels, it's explained that the noisy cricket is actually designed to be "recoilless" similarly to a real-world recoilless rifle; the proper shooting posture is to hold it sideways away from your body - perhaps for the alien it was originally made by, this is comfortable and sensible. This implies that there is some kind of backdraft or shockwave projected backwards from the gun, which hits J in his center mass. Why this reaction doesn't tear his arms off is not explained. It also sucks all the fun out of a great physical comedy gag, and it's a good example of how badly that novel whiffed on the tone of MIB.
Also gotta keep in mind, modern weapons have pretty advanced recoil compensation systems to spread out recoil and reduce it's effect. So, for an extremely advanced weapon even that small, it's entirely possible that similar systems are in place to spread out the recoil that is felt by the firer, reducing it's overall effect as our natural balance compensation (and any trained compensation the firer may have) helps to deal with it.
All of this is to say, it's entirely likely that the force of the projectile being fired is many, many times higher, and that it's recoil is being spread out over the course of a second or so (which would explain the floaty effect you can notice whenever J is thrown back by it, even though we all know that's just cuz it's hollywood movie magic using cables and such, it's a neat idea if it could be canonized as what's actually happening!)
Whale, whale, whale.
that really got me like wow that was good.
I always figured that that needle at the end was more of a tethering mechanism for the energy that is fired from its base. A lot of sci-fi energy weapons have this same aesthetic where it's a "laser" weapon but it has a needle where the muzzle would be.
Something moving that fast would cause a nuclear detonation with the atmosphere.
Not enough mass. Entropy would take over too quickly and even that amount of energy would dissipate rapidly.
The noisy cricket would probably go right through a person like a bullet with that much recoil, I think.
But when the noisy cricket is fired it blows up whatever it hits, meaning that it probably doesn't fire a physical projectile but instead is an energy weapon that fires either plasma or some soft of laser. Just a thought?
How would you make a neuralyzer with current technology. Asking for a friend......
Frypans seem to work. I mean, they got results for me.
There are drugs that cause memory impairment. Maybe weaponizing those chemicals?
The frequency or speed of flashing light that is most likely to cause seizures varies from person to person. Generally, flashing lights most likely to trigger seizures are between the frequency of 5 to 30 flashes per second (Hertz). The likelihood of such conditions combining to trigger a seizure is small. however that is based on current technology and known light frequencies within the visual spectrum...so technically it might be possible but at the moment such a device would be bulky and very obvious...don't ask me how i know that one
@@scottmantooth8785 It would have to be small enough and unobtrusive enough to get into a court room. Oh well, I guess he's screwed. Maybe something infrasonic might be more useful...... lol
@@Nhawk316 I've experimented heavily with those already and they're not so reliable about which memories are impaired. At least I think I have. I don't remember.....
We love dr moo, she's literally a female version of you. I have nothing to say about this ep, great video, nice editing, and delivery🤷🏻♂️
Deja vu
I've just been in this place before.
I used to always think the Noisy Cricket to be like the starter weapon lol like if you wanted to be able to handle the bigger guns, you had to at least deal with the basics 😂
Tbh i kinda felt the opposite - that fucking thing was way too strong for a noob.
I assumed he got that mostly because it's less obvious than giant energy blasts.
Insane... Watched MIB on DVD today, and now I got this recommended..
HI you're assuming it's firing a projectile? Couldn't the Noisy Cricket be an energy weapon? If there's enough of it energy has momentum too. PS Love the show.
Even energy has recoil.
I always assumed the same as well when I was younger. As an older person looking back on the clips with the weapon now, you don't really see a magazine, certainly don't ever see it reload, and it has glowy bits. meninblack.fandom.com/wiki/Noisy_Cricket The MIB wiki also says that it launches a "large orb of energy", so I think we should be looking at Death Star style calculations for this thing instead of bullet calculations.
Also amusingly enough, according to that same wiki link in the animated series they put a silencer on it which... somehow nullifies the recoil? My head hurts trying to figure out that one.
@@the1niddoIf you direct some of the energy in the opposite direction that would "muffle" the recoil
@@helmet098 Sure, but the wiki makes it sound like the silencer completely removes the recoil. Recoil that well, has some serious numbers behind it as we just saw. Just how strong is that silencer, lol?
Energy to momentum for electromagnetic waves is very inefficient. p=E/c so in order to get 240 kgm/s you need 72 GJ. That's about 17.2 tons of TNT. The resulting explosion would be much more impressive compared to the movie.
At 8:43-8:44, the 2 in 240 Kgm/s gets longer. (Inbetween the breaks)
indeed. good eye
Wonder why that is -- kH
HEAD CANON: (because they never technobabble at us about their stuff in the MiB films)
The Suit has some kind of recoil-/protection/inertial-dampeners built in.
The Cricket's round, once the projectile vaporizes as you suggest, is (more or less) held together by some kind of magnetic field, until it hits a solid object.
If you just say that the body and ground can absorb most of the recoil, it just mean that the gun actually impart way more momentum than what you just calculated to REALLY throw him a few feet backward after some of those energy being absorbed.
And in regard to the material of the bullet (and not vaporizing while traveling in the air), the gun itself need to be made with way better material with better molecular bond to not explode from the pressure that pushes the projectile forward at that enormous speed. If such material exists, then the bullet itself can be made with similar or slightly weaker material.
Kyle: Of course we know that humans are not perfect spheres.
Me: Hey! Talk about yourself, why don't you?
Feel free to insert fat joke here.
I'm a twig, so I'll just wait around for the not-so-twiggy comments.
body type an shape are such superficial concepts of judging ones character and overall mass and kinetic impact ratios
@@scottmantooth8785 It's true, unfortunately.
No one here is going that route. I genuinely have nothing to say about others, but I'd love to see humor from those who are comfortable with themselves, in a world where petty shaming takes place.
Andew, Seventh Sun of Edwad I'm comfortable having the same physical build of a stop sign
@@dejbranch8917 I'm like a small, branchless tree, with uneven canopy. It's very unsightful. But my face and shoulders are okay, I suppose.
I don't think, nor did I ever think, the cricket was a projectile weapon. I think its an energy weapon, which changes some things significantly.
For one, if it were a projectile weapon, the velocity alone would vaporize any material currently known to man, like Kyle said... but even if the projectile were made of another otherworldly material, i don't think you'd get the kind of impact you see in the movie... or you would, but to a much more devastating degree.
If the material that projectile is made of can withstand 20% of the speed of light, it certainly won't break up on impact, which means, just like a bullet will go through a concrete wall, it will continue to travel... indefinitely. The projectile would go through your target, through the building behind it, and then the building behind that one, and probably half the city, an airliner, and a satellite before it leaves earth's orbit and probably our solar system. If that's how that thing works, you could probably kill someone by standing on the exact opposite spot on the earth and making a pea shaped hole through our entire planet. I doubt this is how the cricket functions.
I imagine the cricket is more like a gravity gun or something of that nature... an energy, not a projectile, that sends a shot or perhaps a cone of energy hurling at the target, and its the force (perhaps even gravitational force) of the energy being fired that literally picks Agent J off his feet and sends him flying.
Most all guns in MiB fire energy blasts, not physical projectiles.... Cricket implies sound anyway
They all seem to generate recoil, and in order for that to happen you kind of need to "throw" something that has a none zero rest mass in the opposite direction from the recoil.
We never hear a boom or sound from the noisy cricket, only what it hits. So that means its probably an energy weapon firing a laser or a form of plasma.
@@psychetitan3529 Then where does the recoil come from?
@@buttsufancypantsu1644 Possibly force from the energy leaving the gun.
@@psychetitan3529 You don't get that kind of force from massless things without also vaporizing whatever that force happens to be acting upon.
3:35 the best thing about the Noisy Cricket is that it actually does both :
- The first projectile is very light and shot at an insane velocity.
- And the heavier projectile thrown at a relatively low speed is the shooter.
if you stuff the Blue Whales with explosives before launching them out the back of the rocket, you can then use the explosion to further push the rocket forward. This is called an Orion Drive and it's really efficient, but it also tends to scatter things you don't want (like whale guts) everywhere.
0:49
"Physics work the same everywhere in thr universe "
Me: "What about blackholes?"
The inside of black holes is mathematically not part of this universe anymore
What if the projectile was made of concentrated neutrons? Like a 1-2 mm neutron star?
Then it would weigh millions of tons.
Pulling the trigger on that bad boi would probably cause the weapon to lodge itself in your skull, no way you will have enough grip on something so small to to keep hold of it firing at that speed.
And that reason alone should tell you that whatever caused the recoil-like effect, wasn't recoil. By the simple logic that if you make a weapon, you make it usefull in some way. So, the original recipients of the NC had a way to handle it safely.
My private theory is that the noisy cricket is a weapon that creates a tiny packet of superhot plasma (a few fractions of a gram) and accelerates it to near relativistic velocities
I always thought the noisy cricket was a sonic weapon.
The other impressive thing about the Noisy Cricket is that it can accelerate its projectile to that speed. Its energy storage system is clearly much more efficient than anything that we can create.
I was thinking instead of the projectile having to go at Super speeds what if the projectile was very dense, what kind of force would need to be imparted on it to move it out of the weapon at the speed shown in the movie. Would love to see another look at this topic looking at it this way.
what is the maximum amount of time it could take before kyle says my name as the random supporter that he thanks?
i must know... for science!! 😁👍
I don't remember liking this video
Edit: I don't remember leaving this comment
Edit: I don't remember being here
Barry Sonnenfeld, Walter F. Parkes and Laurie MacDonald, Ed Solomon. (Director, producers, and writer, respectively) [DPW]: “let’s have a gag where a gun has so much recoil, it literally throws people across the room”
Also DPW: “if we’re gonna do that, we need to have it be tiny. Like, not even the size of a PSM pistol (similar to the Makarov line, but smaller.)
Kyle: allow me to introduce myself.”