100% yes to reading your gear's manual. I've missed features and ways of using plugins because I didn't read the manual first. Also, how do you feel about using parallel compression as well to bring out detail and add power?
I will soon buy Boost from UrsaDSP (which i have seen in some of your recent videos too). Therefore i would be happy if you could cover in depth that maximizer in one of your next videos.
What are you trying to tell us with the 4th point? The -7 LUFS version is LOUDER than the -12 LUFS one, which contradicts what you said, i.e., there is no point of mastering louder if a platform normalizes the audio. Confusing.
Yeah, I do see your point as I was expecting that both would sound at a relatively similar volume with the -12 LUFS possibly a little more dynamic but the -7 LUFS version sounded so much louder as if it hadn't been pulled down to -13 LUFS (UA-cam Normalization) and level matched to the -12 LUFS version which I thought was going to be the illustration.
I'm pretty sure that UA-cam normalization just affects the ENTIRE track's AVERAGE level... so the -7 was bound to be louder than the -12 version... but, at the same exact normalized volume, the more dynamic -12 version will ALWAYS sound better, because it "breathes" a bit more...
Thanks for the idea about using soft-clippers for loudness.
Thanks for watching! Hope it helps!
SageAudio.com
I love this channel!
Hey Wagner! I'm glad to hear it! As always thanks for watching!
SageAudio.com
AWESOME SAGEAUDIO TANKS FOR SHARING
Hey Rafa! Thanks for watching and leaving a comment!
SageAudio.com
I really like this channel. There's so much to learn when working with audio. Keep up the good work. Thumbs UP for all the explicit material.
Hey Dani! Thanks for watching! Great to hear that you're enjoying the channel!
SageAudio.com
Why are you so wise? Btw loved your work! ❤️ Keep going 👍
Hey Jaysum! Thanks for watching! Great to hear you're enjoying the channel!
SageAudio.com
What a great video again! Thanks so much, please make video about soft clipping and low-level compression
Thanks for watching! That's a great suggestion! We'll make that at some point in the future!
SageAudio.com
100% yes to reading your gear's manual. I've missed features and ways of using plugins because I didn't read the manual first. Also, how do you feel about using parallel compression as well to bring out detail and add power?
Forget my question about parallel compression as you addressed it a couple of weeks ago.
Hey Luke! Absolutely - reading the manual saves so much time in the long run. Also sounds good about your question! Thanks for watching!
SageAudio.com
If you have, or ever get a uad audio interface it would be very nice to see some videos about uad plugins. Some of the best stuff I’ve ever used!
Hey David! If we do we'll make videos about them for sure! Thanks for watching!
SageAudio.com
I will soon buy Boost from UrsaDSP (which i have seen in some of your recent videos too).
Therefore i would be happy if you could cover in depth that maximizer in one of your next videos.
Hey Ricochet! Sounds good! We'll discuss maximization in a future video!
SageAudio.com
@@sageaudio Looking forward to it! Thanks a lot.
What song is this?
It's called 'Cost of Living' by Brent Wood. Thanks for watching!
SageAudio.com
U send full song on sample or short???
Thanks for watching! We send a mastered sample of your song - roughly 1 minute.
SageAudio.com
How have I never heard of upward compression? Gonna look into that - if anyone knows any decent affordable plugins to start with, please let me know!
Boost (UrsaDSP)
MV2 (Waves)
@@rivella99 thx!
Hey Tom! It's great! Ricochet has some good suggestions!
SageAudio.com
What are you trying to tell us with the 4th point? The -7 LUFS version is LOUDER than the -12 LUFS one, which contradicts what you said, i.e., there is no point of mastering louder if a platform normalizes the audio. Confusing.
nah bro, most professional audios are mastered at -8LUFS, it's just an in deep industry standard for color + overall punchiness of the song
@@sick3drako I don't disagree, what I was saying is the 4th point and its example is confusing.
Yeah, I do see your point as I was expecting that both would sound at a relatively similar volume with the -12 LUFS possibly a little more dynamic but the -7 LUFS version sounded so much louder as if it hadn't been pulled down to -13 LUFS (UA-cam Normalization) and level matched to the -12 LUFS version which I thought was going to be the illustration.
@@HandHeldHalo -13lufs be sounding waacck, weeaker, fuck that listen to my mixtape 😈😈
I'm pretty sure that UA-cam normalization just affects the ENTIRE track's AVERAGE level... so the -7 was bound to be louder than the -12 version... but, at the same exact normalized volume, the more dynamic -12 version will ALWAYS sound better, because it "breathes" a bit more...