Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017) Movie Reaction [FIRST TIME WATCHING]
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
- this Spider Man took us by surprise! we had a lot of fun and we hope you will too!
For full-length or unedited reactions,
👉 / mjoy4fun
-----------------------------------------
➡ MJoy4Fun is an interracial couple from Romania and the Philippines. We mainly post reactions and vlogs on our channel! if you enjoyed this video, leave us a comment below! 😊
-----------------------------------------
Enjoyed this video? check our PLAYLISTS!!!
War Film Reactions: • War Film Drama Reactions
GOD OF WAR SAGA: • Playlist
League of Legends: • Playlist
Overwatch Animated Shorts: • Playlist
World of Warcraft: • Playlist
Tales of Runeterra: • Playlist
Diablo: • Playlist
Assassin's Creed: • Playlist
Apex Legends: • Playlist
Follow us on:
Facebook: mjoy4fun - Розваги
![Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) Reaction [MCU REACTIONS]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xOiA5oJiW90/mqdefault.jpg)
in the comics spiderman DOES NOT make the webs from his body through his hand. in the comics the webs come from a device he made. this is the normal way spiderman has webs. however in the Toby spiderman movies (2002), the director chose to make spiderman have the webs come out of his body not a device. this was not supposed to be how the webs work. they were supposed come from a device he made. that was always the correct way. that's why in this movie his webs doesn't come through his body. but I understand the confusion.
Yes but what a wonderful weight loss tactic being able to shoot web. ... and then there's the anatomical question. If he's really like a spider, the webs shouldn't come from his hands...
@MASTER GINGER - The Toby Maguire Spider-Man films are the ONLY Spider-Man movies with the ridiculous webbing being a part of his powers nonsense. In the COMIC BOOKS, the webs were always from web-shooters he built. In the Amazing Spider-Man films and MCU Spider-Man films, they followed THE COMIC BOOK FORMAT, that being the webs are from web-shooters that Peter BUILT. Not that Tobey Maguire nonsense. Got it? Good.
@@GavinBollard No ... not from his hands. Can we just admit, though, that both the Tobey Maguire Spider-Man's ability to shoot webs from his hands, and the regular Spider-Man's incredibly convenient invention of a super-strong, super versitile synthetic web that fits into tiny cartridges that hardly ever run out and seem to cost little or nothing to manufacture, and which he never even thinks about exploiting for monetary gain, on top of an already preposterous origin story about gaining super spider powers from the bite of a radioactive arachnid are utterly ridiculous? Spidey's a comic book superhero, and I love him, but let's not get up on our high unicorn about realism where he's concerned.
@@oliverbrownlow5615 Realism is the last thing on my mind. Comedy is great though. If we were being realistic, Spider-man would bend over and shoot web from behind him. He'd lose more than half of his body weight after a few webs. Best not to have a mental picture of that.
The webs are mechanical, not biological. This was so for the original spiderman in the comics. For a while this changed and it was biological in the Raimi version but MCU returened to traditional.
I think they just got confused and thought Tony made the webs
Sony did it first. The 2012 Andrew Garfield Spider-Man had mechanical web shooters.
In the comics, Vulture was one of Spider-Man's first big villains. He was an okay villain in the comic. However, Michael Keaton's performance as Vulture in the movie is a huge improvement! Enjoyed the reaction!!!!! 💪🙏🏽
Yes!!!!!!! Thank you!!!!!!!! His version of Vulture felt like Walter White from Breaking Bad!!!! Very underrated MCU villain 🙏🏽
One of this movie's most hilarious lines is "I'm pretty sure he's a War Criminal now but...".
Stan Lee's favorite superhero of all time is Spider-Man.
Peter makes his own webs. It was shown in a scene in science class when he was stirring a beaker. When he lifted the locker and grabbed a jar labeled "web fluid". Also in Civil War Tony made a comment about the webs and Peter also webbed Tony's hand.
lol yes, you are correct! The original Spiderman could climb walls like a spider, and was fast, strong, and agile, but he invented the web-shooters to wear on his wrists. In some of the movies they changed it, so they he naturally shot the webs as part of his power, but original Spiderman had to invent a device to do that.
Edit: Original Spiderman also had his "Spidey-Sense", so he could sense danger around him, like a spider sensing a fly in his web. That power was never clearly explained, but was the excuse why Spiderman could tell where crime was happening, and could go and stop it!
Edit #2: YOU ARE CORRECT AGAIN! That's Michael Keaton playing The Vulture in this movie, one of Spiderman's enemies, but in an old movie, he did play Batman once! Good eye, Marian!
When Pete said "The hell?? He's big now." a seriously under estimating line. His "Wholly shit!" line from CIVIL WAR was more adequate.
The guy at the end of the movie talking to Vulture is another classic Spider-Man villain, but you wouldn't know it unless you were a fan and knew everyone's names.
michael mando aka vaas from far cry 3
I just noticed it too, far cry 3 villain was awesome
He also had a part in Breaking Bad. He's done well.
Mostly all Spidermen use web shooters only Toby Maguire had organic webs and far cry 3 was so good and vass was like the best part of the game i hope you guys eventually react to the other spiderman movies
39:21 that guy is the voice an face of "Vaas Montenegro" in the videogame far cry 3 😨😨😨😨
Historically in the comics Peter made his web fluid. It was not organic until he wore the alien symbiote suit that organically created webs. That symbiote eventually became Venom when Peter rejected it for trying to permanently bond with him.
Peter makes his webs in a lab and uses web shooter and cartridges in the comics and in the Amazing SpiderMan movie.
But in the 2002Spiderman Movie,
Peter shoots the webs from his wrist without wed-shooters.
So you remember it correctly,
but the 2002 movie isn’t like the comic books,
having webshooters and running out of webbing is normally one of SpiderMan’s biggest limitations...
As much as I love this movie, they really dropped the ball with Shocker. He's always been one of my favorite Spider-Man villains, here they just made him look weak.
For those commentors saying that except for the Andrew Garfield movies, Peter always had mechanical web shooters, you're only mostly right. During the Evolve Or Die/ The Other storyline, one of the new abilities he gets after dying is the ability to produce organic webbing. He eventually looses that ability and returns to mechanical webbing but I can't think of exactly when at the moment.
I think I read somewhere that he had organic webs in the movies because someone thought him having powers and being a super-genius was too unbelievable... in a movie about a guy who sticks to walls.
It's always funny how easily movie viewers say someone deserved to die, lol.
Hmm, for some reason I never noticed that little line about the Washignton Monument.. Let's clear all that up shall we:
From Wikipedia
Construction of the monument finally began three years later in 1848 with the excavation of the site, the laying of the cornerstone on the prepared bed, and laying the original foundation around and on top of the cornerstone, before the construction of its massive walls began the next year. Regarding modern claims of slave labor being used in construction, Washington Monument Historian John Steele Gordon stated "I can't say for certain, but the stonemasonry was pretty highly skilled, so it's unlikely that slaves would've been doing it. The stones were cut by stonecutters, which is highly skilled work; and the stones were hoisted by means of steam engines, so you'd need a skilled engineer and foreman for stuff like that. Tending the steam engine, building the cast-iron staircase inside-that wasn't grunt work. ... The early quarries were in Maryland, so slave labor was undoubtedly used to quarry and haul the stone"[39] Abraham Riesman, who quoted Gordon, states "there were plenty of people who worked as skilled laborers while enslaved in antebellum America. Indeed, there were enslaved people who worked as stonemasons. So the possibility remains that there were slaves who performed some of the necessary skilled labor for the monument."[39] According to historian Jesse Holland, it is very likely that African-American slaves were among the construction workers, given that slavery prevailed in Washington and its surrounding states at that time, and slaves were commonly used in public and private construction.
Gordon's arguments are valid for the second phase (1879-1888) after slavery was abolished, when every stone laid required dressing and polishing by a skilled stonemason. ..."
Oh! If you start DC, the 2009 animated Wonder Woman is actually my favourite of the DC movies! Underappreciated, but a lot of fun!
I love the twist of Liz's dad so much.
Flight with Denzel Washington. This is the movie he should have won an oscar for not training day
The actress who voices Karen in Spider-Man's suit (Jennifer Connelly), is married to the actor who voiced Jarvis in Iron Man's suit and plays Vision (Paul Bettany).
The MCU went to a more original comic book Spiderman than the previous films. He's younger, much more of a techno-nerd, and creates his own web shooting devices. One of the funniest scenes you reacted to - when Tony goes to open the car door and Peter hugs him- was improvised and wasn't in the script. Good reactions, especially when you find out that the villian is Liz's Dad. 👍👍
Didn't both the Tobey and Andrew movies started of with Peter in High School?
I agree!!!! 💪🙏🏽
@@markcruz359 They did. However, Tobey's Spider-Man became a hero after he graduated from high school. Andrew's Spider-Man was in his Junior year in high school.
@@markcruz359 Tobey was 26(Peter 17), Andrew was 28(Peter 16), and Tom was 20(Peter 15). I think visually Tom looks closer to the age he was portraying.
@@tk72231968 oh you're talking about the actors. I was talking about the character. Its great that Hollywood is no longer shying away from casting actual teenagers to portray students
31:01 I understand the confusion lol. In the comics, Spider-Man always had webshooters. The reason Spider-Man had organic webs in the Sam Rami trilogy was because him and James Cameron wanted his webs to be part of his mutation for the movie. Which is fine, but it kind of destroys his intelligence in my opinion. The only times in the comic he had organic webs was when he gets the black symbiote suit, *Alien goo that shap shifts around his body*, when he turned into Man-Spider and Spider-Man 2099, *Forgot his name, but he's a Mexican Spider-Man.* However, Peter Parker/Spider-Man always used webshooters. Him inventing the technology shows that he has brains and brawn. Regardless, I love all versions of Spider-Man.
Spiderman in the comics always used mechanical webshooters. The Spiderman movies where it just came out of his wrist was a change made for the movies...honestly a change that should have never been made.
🕸️Peter Parker made the webs (via science) that you're seeing in this film.¹ Remember in _Captain America Civil War_ how Tony was amazed by the webbing Peter made.🕸️
Since his first comic in 1962, _Peter_ had always made the web fluid and web shooters that he wore on his wrists. As far as I know, only in the 2002 to 2007 _Sam Raimi_ Spider-Man films 🕷️ does the webbing come out of him organcally. But no other Spider-Man, _before or since,_ had organic web shooters. 🕸️
Wonderful reaction, _as always._
Be well! 🙋🏼♂️
··•🕷️•··
¹ ─ With the exception of the fancy techno webs from the suit Tony gave him. Otherwise, Pete always made the regular webbing.
Spider-Man in the comics has web shooters, he doesn't have organic webs
I absolutely adore the two of you. 💖 I just discovered your UA-cam a few months ago but I've watched every video since and have been going to older videos and watching them too 🙂 Thank you for adding so much laughter to my life. My wishes for much success 👍
39:05
Aunt May: What the fu…?!
Peter: 😳
Joy is right, originally Spider-Man cannot produce his own web, the only version who can do it is Tobey Maguire's, which is the one that makes the most sense, the spider changed his dna so it's actually dumb that he's always had to make his own webs separately
Peter was and always will be a smart ass. He became Spiderman at 14. With that power comes total attitude!
Okay, a little Spider-Man 101:
Since the comic books, Spider-Man has always had mechanical web-shooters he built himself using web fluid he created himself. It was the Sam Rami/Tobey Maguire Spider-Man films who came up with the ridiculous idea to have organic web-shooters. Because this was a lot of people's first exposure to Spider-Man, many assumed that the organic web-shooters were always there. They weren't.
Love your reactions and can't wait until you guys get to Black Panther and Avengers: Infinity War!!!!😁😁😁😁😁
No, Spider-Man webs come from his "web-shooters." Sam Raimi changed that in his 2002-2006 Spider-Man trilogy movies, so I can understand why some people would be confused about that... especially if that was your fist introduction to Spider-Man. but, every other version of Spider-Man since his creation in 1962 has always used "web-shooters." Peter creates the web fluid in a lab... then puts the fluid into these cartridge's which then go into his web-shooters.
Dear Joy: some Spidermen the web is biological; this Spider-Man the web is man made and from his outfit
That was fun!
I'm enjoying your reactions!
Fun fact (as others have said): Michael Keaton was Batman for two movies in the late 80s / early 90s. He's played other roles but many would say those were his biggest movies along with Beetlejuice and his career had slowed since then.
However in 2014 he was in Birdman, playing a washed up actor trying to revitalize his career with a stage play after being a star as the superhero Birdman years before. That was a massive hit with critics (really great movie) and reminded everyone how good Michael Keaton can be, putting him back in the public eye.
Now here he is in Spider-Man (2017) playing another "bird man" (The Vulture) to pretty much everyone's approval and he's back doing more big movies (like upcoming DC stuff again).
"It's just me and you." This got me a little
Peter inventing his own web fluid is what shows his high intelligence. He's more than just a spider bite.
the 8 years later part was an error from Sony, it's actually 4 years later
32:54 this comment is hilarious because he DID play Batman lol
I want to say this in a way to help the two of you understand. Many African-Americans, understandably, have complicated feelings about their ancestors place in American history, especially given that history's effect on how things are today. It isn't for someone that doesn't share that history or experience, to tell them their feelings are wrong about it.
Marvel's first movie hero a must to watch_Howard the Duck:movie before DC world. History!
All Tony had to do was contact Peter to let him know the FBI was now all over it - Thanks to Spiderman. But he kept that to himself and events played out. Instead of being there for Peter, given his abilities and association, the adults are quite disinterested in communicating.
Yeah in the comics Peter is a genius and creates his own web fluid.
27:31 IT HAS BEGAN!!!!!!
32:58 thats beacuse he played Batman
i was unsure at forst, but he was good as batman!
At the beginning the whole *8 YEARS LATER* thing is incorrect, it's supposed to read *4 YEARS LATER*
Batman dark knight trilogy is good
Actually Toby McGuire is the only “spider-man” ever to produce his own webs, every other Spider-Man the only abilities gained from the bite are wall crawling, super-strength, and spidey-sense
Of course, if you really want to go old school, you could watch the original *Batman* movie from 1966.
This one and the one in the Comic he makes these Web shooters that he puts these Capsules filled with Web fluid he makes to make the Webs, That old Spiderman did something Different from the comics by making it come out of him, that's not how it was suppose to be. The Web shooters are closer to the comics. Should watch the Amazing Spiderman Movies it shows him making the web shooters in the first movie. And he has the Web Shooters on both hands not just the one you saw.
27:38 🤣 awesome reaction!
Good to see you!!!
Hey, thanks!
Please you have to watch all the Spider-Man movies. It’s a requirement for the future of much movies
Definitely watch the old Spider-Man trilogy and The Amazing Spider-Man 1 and 2 before you watch "Spider-Man: No Way Home". You HAVE to watch them beforehand!
😄🇱🇰😃
can u guys continue with star wars pls
samok haha
vaas far cry 3
You should watch the OG Spider-Man movie from 1977. It was very ambitious for what it tried to do with practical effects.
Have you guys considered reacting to Wes Anderson films? Not always a ton of action, but very well made. And usually very funny. Was thinking about how Flash isn't a big muscle-bound bully in this film more of just a rich douche. Remembering that actor from "Grand Budapest Hotel" simply delightful.
I blame AVI ARAD for turning this Spider-Man into the Iron Man Jr.
I don't want to offend any woman but I gotta say that I will not see aunt May with the same eyes again. They always portrayed her as a little old lady but Marisa Tomei is hot and my age ❤️❤️💔🖤
Unsubscribed
???
Not a fan of this Spider-Man. The previous ones and in the comics didn’t have all that techie crap.
He’s Spider-Man, not Spider-Iron Man.
Plus, he’s annoying. Lol
When you're gonna react to Star Wars episodes 1, 2 and 3?
I'm just swinging by to leave this comment to help the algorithm for you. But I hate this movie, in fact... All Marvel and DC movies are absolute trash. Please please PLEASE don't succumb to pandering and start doing all the crap Marvel and DC movies - NONE of them are actually GOOD films, they are the lowest form of "brainless entertainment" duplicated over and over again... Scorsese's comment on them is 100% accurate:
He said:
"Many of the elements that define cinema as I know it are there in Marvel pictures. What’s not there is revelation, mystery or GENUINE emotional danger … They are sequels in name but they are REMAKES in spirit, and everything in them is OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED because it can’t really be any other way. That’s the nature of modern film franchises: market-researched, audience-tested, vetted, modified, re-vetted and remodified until they’re ready for consumption."
Cinema and franchise movies are not the same thing and I agree with him.
"Lighten up Francis"
@@richardrobbins8067 what? I was making a point, a VALID point thank you very much. No one asked you to mock me... Grow up.
@@DimensionDevices An opinion is not a valid point, it's not even an argument. They make fun movies and I agree with some of your points but it's overall an opinion concerning movies. I don't think you know how subjectivity works mate. "Good films" is subjective, now what it does to the industry and the influence they have on production is another thing. Remove the first first of your text and you are making arguments or points. You can like something without liking it's effect. Scorcese for instance has monopoly on gangster and mob movies, pushing out many other indie directors potential which is essentially the same. But I still like his movies. The thing here is that the only people at fault in any entertainemt is the consumers. Nobody makes things that nobody wants to pay for. Consumerism is very simple.
@@Gnossiene369 "they make fun movies" - That is YOUR opinion... Thus using YOUR OWN logic, it is invalid. Good job...
I'm not young anymore but have noticed many younger reactors seem to ask questions early on instead of 'noting it' for later and letting the movie unfold.