Touchchat wordpower 60 basic is much better to compare to LAMP than the one shown here. Thank you for all these comparisons! Each person is different and has different needs. Schools need to do a better job at offering options.
You watched one of two. There is also a two of two. However, I suggest watching this webinar I put together instead.: ua-cam.com/video/TVJncuNJGeY/v-deo.html
Like autistic scripting - using the whole phrase instead of self generating phrases. So do you feel like the touch chat lead to more scripting over self generating language?
It is best practice to choose a page set with the smallest symbols an individual can both SEE and touch. That being said, there are blind individuals who can utilize programs such as lamp words for life with a keyguard because they have learned vocabulary due to the consistent motor planning. You never know so it’s always better to aim high and move backwards than aim low and never get anywhere.
![[UA] NAVI vs MOUZ | BO5 | IEM Rio 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CMBYk0cbGoA/mqdefault.jpg)
Touchchat wordpower 60 basic is much better to compare to LAMP than the one shown here. Thank you for all these comparisons! Each person is different and has different needs. Schools need to do a better job at offering options.
I prefer 108 to 60. It’s more robust without as many predictive links which is why I chose that one instead.
Thank you! I’m writing a report trying to justify choosing touch chat vs proloquo, I was getting writers block and this helped!
I'm looking at getting a chat app for my 2 year old who has a severe speech delay. Thanks for this comparison. I am sold on TouchChat
I am confused between lamp and touch chat , is motor memory better in lamp and scripting becomes common in word power
Please see the following webinar which better describes both: presenters.aacconference.com/videos/UXpNelFURTQ=
7:47
Let's find sentences "I like sleep late" and “You push new car"
I wish you had finished the Speak for Yourself part. That was the one I was interested in comparing to Proloquo2Go
There is a Second video
The review for Talk for yourself was cut off.
You watched one of two. There is also a two of two. However, I suggest watching this webinar I put together instead.: ua-cam.com/video/TVJncuNJGeY/v-deo.html
Do you feel touch chat 108 lead to scripting and LAMp better
I’m not sure I understand your question. What do you mean by scripting?
Like autistic scripting - using the whole phrase instead of self generating phrases. So do you feel like the touch chat lead to more scripting over self generating language?
Can I ask where you got the iPad cover? I use proloquo4text.
This is an old cover for the iPad Air 2. Unfortunately, it’s no longer available and isn’t made for other model iPads. It’s a Trident case.
The busier it is is definitely not better for Someone struggling with visuals
It is best practice to choose a page set with the smallest symbols an individual can both SEE and touch. That being said, there are blind individuals who can utilize programs such as lamp words for life with a keyguard because they have learned vocabulary due to the consistent motor planning. You never know so it’s always better to aim high and move backwards than aim low and never get anywhere.
10:00
Is touchchat same as novachat?
Yes - the WordPower files are the same.
@@stineaac1 thank you. Now we have two devices, Novachat for my son and touchchat for my daughter. We are still learning about it.
9:54
7:46
7:34
5:25
7:25
6:40
9:58