Martin Wolf, Financial Times: Stop banks from creating money (Positive Money)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 жов 2024
  • www.positivemon...
    Martin Wolf, Chief Economics Commentator of Financial Times speaks at the event "Does Money Grow on Trees?" at the hall of the Institute for Chartered Accountants on 9th September 2014
    --------------------------
    SUBSCRIBE to Positive Money UK's videos:
    www.youtube.com...
    Like us on Facebook / positivemoney
    Follow us on Twitter / positivemoneyuk
    Follow us on Google+ www.positivemon...
    Positive Money is a not-for-profit research and campaign group. They work to raise awareness of the connections between our current monetary and banking system and the serious social, economic and ecological problems that face the UK and the world today. In particular they focus on the role of banks in creating the nation's money supply through the accounting process they use when they make loans - an aspect of banking which is poorly understood. Positive Money believe these fundamental flaws are at the root of - or a major contributor to - problems of poverty, excessive debt, growing inequality and environmental degradation. For more information, please visit: www.positivemon...
    Animation by Henry Edmonds
    Help us caption & translate this video!
    amara.org/v/FYAF/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 83

  • @david8157
    @david8157 9 років тому +22

    Many argue that if the power to create money for the public good was returned to government then politicians would abuse it. Perhaps there would be some abuses; after all politicians are human. No human system will ever be perfect.
    But one thing we know for absolute certain at this point is that if you leave the power to create money for private profit in private hands there will be disastrous criminal abuses which will devastate national and global economies on a regular basis which we will all have to pay for.
    What else is the current crisis other than a private banking created depression?
    Once the deregulation of the financial sector was basically completed by Clinton, it took them less than a decade to bankrupt the entire Western hemisphere.

    • @lunarmodule6419
      @lunarmodule6419 5 років тому

      Private or Gov - as long as there are rules that profit the vast majority of the population + real enforcement : fines and prison.

  • @david8157
    @david8157 9 років тому +17

    Banks should be regarded as production facilities; money factories; they produce money and sell it (loan) for profit (interest).
    Banks create money out of nothing, and sell it for profit.
    This should be illegal.

    • @cyrusol
      @cyrusol 3 роки тому

      Banks also destroy money into nothingness.

  • @RonasRoadshow
    @RonasRoadshow 8 років тому +6

    rather have mone creation in hands of govt than banks. anyday.

  • @Mitjitsu
    @Mitjitsu 10 років тому +1

    One downside commonly missed by critics is the crony capitalist element. Where a government of the day could refuse to give (or may undeservedly give) a person government created money for political reasons.

  • @cyrusol
    @cyrusol 3 роки тому

    The German Bundesbank fluently explained in the monthly report of April 2017 why Irving Fisher's idea of a 100% reserve actually doesn't bring us a more stable banking system, why it doesn't stop money being created ex nihilo and why it would actually be harmful since certain operations and function carried out by banks now wouldn't be possible anymore.

  • @triforcelink
    @triforcelink 10 років тому

    In a sense, we all can 'print' money as individuals. We may not be able to create the physical dollar bills, but any time we do some form of work there is the possibility for us to be compensated for that work, we go from noting to something using our own will. Just a random thought.

    • @JohnNewtoneu
      @JohnNewtoneu 10 років тому

      most of you money you are paid for your work come from debt, that is a big issue

    • @triforcelink
      @triforcelink 10 років тому

      I can always do more work to cover my debt.

    • @JohnNewtoneu
      @JohnNewtoneu 10 років тому

      the money you are paid is borrowed to pay you, it comes from debt

    • @JohnNewtoneu
      @JohnNewtoneu 10 років тому

      triforcelink Problem : money was borrowed to pay you in the 1st place

    • @triforcelink
      @triforcelink 10 років тому

      Why does that matter? If i borrow money, I can always do more work to pay it back. It's not like I have to borrow more money to be able to pay it back.

  • @lunarmodule6419
    @lunarmodule6419 5 років тому

    Wealth us really what makes lives better. But money is helps wealth be generated, exchanged and preserve it. The point here is the function of money is being shifted toward the rich interest not the majority of people. Banks make more money with shady manœuvers then supporting real wealth creation. Thx

  • @clintockmaconaghie3763
    @clintockmaconaghie3763 9 років тому

    Give the SNP Indy then close the border and charge Scots services and goods entering England even if they are on their way to Europe. The French charge 12% or 17% tax on Whisky imports to France right now.

  • @mulllhausen
    @mulllhausen 9 років тому

    why do we need more money to be created again? i know of no reason, yet it is assumed necessary throughout this video

    • @danthemansmail
      @danthemansmail 9 років тому

      Peter Miller your question gets right down to the crux of it. I could recommend many sources of information that could answer your question, but none so comprehensive as Zeitgeist The Addedum. You can find it on NetFlix and probably on You Tube if you go looking. Prepare yourself for what you will learn. Your very world view will be altered and you cannot unlearn what you find out. There is a price to be paid for knowledge......

    • @mulllhausen
      @mulllhausen 9 років тому

      Dan Harris i know about zeitgeist. i wasn't saying "we don't need money", i was saying "we don't need *more* money"

    • @danthemansmail
      @danthemansmail 9 років тому

      Actually Peter we do need more money...all of the time now. Since the crash so much debt has been taken on by all the sovereign countries of the western world, that they constantly need more free money to pay the interest on the debt already incurred. There is a reason that the Fed has not raised the interest rate in 6 years. They can't. If they do...the sovereign debt becomes unsustainable and the whole thing comes tumbling down. We are near the end of the ponzi scheme my friend....hope you find a chair when the music stops. Its going to stop soon I am afraid.....

    • @mulllhausen
      @mulllhausen 9 років тому +1

      Dan Harris i think you're right about being near the end of the ponzi scheme. but printing their way out of this crisis is not a necessity. default would be the better option imo

    • @danthemansmail
      @danthemansmail 9 років тому +3

      Peter Miller I hate capitalism and believe it to be evil. But it does have a self righting mechanism if you let it work. Yes all those banks should have gone to bankruptcy during the crash. The day they changed the rules and began propping up the banks instead of letting the market do its job...was the day they sealed their fate....and ours.