Sarah Boone Argues Jorge's Family Emotional Outburst gets her a New Trial! BC Breaks it Down!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 лис 2024
- Trial Lawyer Martin E. Radner breaks down Sarah Boone's Argument that Jorge's Family's Emotional Outburst gets her a new trial.
For donations PayPal brothercounsel99@gmail.com
Click on the link below to check out the sponsor in today's video store and remember to use the coupon code I mentioned!
thesuitdepot.c...
Follow me on
X
x.com/brotherC...
Get your brother counsel swag!
www.etsy.com/s...
Please subscribe! / @brothercounsel ?sub_confirmation=1
#brothercounsel
For inquiries, please email brothercounsel99@gmail.com
I rewatched the closing arguments multiple times and it was actually Owens that brought attention to the Torres family. Mr Jay was running the video, Mr Cacciatore was up in the well watching the video. It was Owens who turned in his chair and pointed to Jorge's family to get out. Neither Mr Jay or Mr Cacciatore would've seen or heard anything on their own and the video would've continued to play, uninterrupted, while Jorge's mother left the courtroom. This is entirely of Owens making and it's disgusting the way he went about dealing with it in the moment and now.
Exactly. This is the kind of dirty Shenanigans I don't like to see in a courtroom.
Owens is such a scumbag.
@@windywednesday4166 he didn't say anything about it untik the jury left. He's still a horrible person tho.
Streisand effect!! You are so right!!! He did !!
@bethanychatman9531 but he pointed them out when Jorge's mom started crying...he was the one who told them to leave while the video was playing. All that poor woman did was cry at a video of her son and this ass pointed it out and told her to leave loud enough for the cameras to pick it up...if the DAs didn't notice it the jury may not have either. Technically he's the one who had the outburst in court!
Owens made the emotional outburst!!
Her certainly brought more attention to it.
Well said! He certainly did.
Yes indeed - we would never have know there was an outburst if Owens hadn't spoken. HE'S the one who made the outburst, IMO. At the time, I wasn't surprised he tried to use it for a mistrial, and after that was denied, I figured he would try again as grounds for appeal.
@@Vanisle-cat the pos just trying to find any excuse to draw attention to the jury. I don't think the jury even noticed it the family quiet and respectful the room was dark and they were focused on watching the video. No one their right mind will hire the sexist arrogant pos only losers like looney boone will hire him. I trust Judge Kraynick that he will deny all his frivolous bs filings! Sob!🤬
@@kekei2259 If Owen’s lived close by, you have to grant him he’s rights, followed by close lefts 🤣🤣
It's weird to pretend that the jury won't know that photos of a dead child or a video of a man dying is sad if no one in the room acts sad.
I don't know if Sarah is pretending. Since her very first interview with police at the crime scene, she has demonstrated countless that she doesn't understand how normal people think, feel, or behave.
Thank you BC for explaining this in such a professional, compassionate manner. Watching Owens’ petty, callous display about Jorge’s mother’s reaction was appalling. Judge Kraynick will surely shut this down.
Yes, thank you indeed. And it wasn't just Owens' display (which I thought was meant to bring attention to the family's grief), but Sarah's cold hearted nonreaction to it all. The family's quiet crying was similar to that of the family in the trial of Lori Vallow Daybell and there were no motions raised on the basis there.
@Vanisle-cat Exactly! If we were talking about James Owens' "emotional outburst" being prejudicial to the jury, I might agree... but it isn't the state bringing this up. 😮
@@windywednesday4166 never mind he did say something gross, while the jury was there.
@@bethanychatman9531 ❤️
@@bethanychatman9531what did he say in the presence of the jury? Owens yelling was when the jury was out
The judge asked if they wanted a curative instruction and they said no
Exactly!!
Exactly!!
😅❤ Yes, he did.
"Alleged Victim"??? UMMMM???? There was a victim and he is DEAD! How is that Alleged?
Right?! Owens has been using 'that term' to refer to Jorge throughout the whole case. It's truly disgusting and unnecessary. Especially now that Sarah has been convicted. ❤
They're still pretending that she didn't do anything wrong. And Owens argued in court that men can't be victims of women.
I thought that Owens shot himself in the foot by actually calling attention to the mother’s very understandable reaction to that video.
He did that on purpose looking for any reason to get another trial for his extremely guilty client
That inconvenience to Sarah is called emotions, something she lacks off. She and Owens are horrible people.
Hope Owens likes working for people as gross and insufferable as he and Sarah are. That's his clientele now if he wants to continue this line of work.
Oh, she has emotions. Just not the good ones.
Please stop vilifying the pro bono attorney. Owens is doing what he is supposed to do--provide a robust defense for his client. If he did not raise the issue, he would be negligent.
@@SmilingSynic It was the WAY he raised the issue. He didn't have to do it in the callous, evil, heartless manner he did, where he POINTED at the family and accused the state and police detectives of a conspiracy against his client. That the video had been out for four and a half years, as if that means a family member finding it distressing and having to leave the courtroom was unnatural. He crossed so many lines. He could have made the motion for mistrial without trying to blame and shame both the victim's family, and accuse the state of ethical violations. The way he did it, and the accusations within, were not necessary at all, and not a part of defending his client or making the motion.
Owens was more of an interruption then the family. I can't believe he said anything in front of jury to the family.
It just makes him look bad and reflects on SB too.
Owens did not need to be so cruel to get his point across.
And heartless Boone wrote the entire time. Wow. She has no soul.
When you take a child to the doctor you give her something to keep her occupied to prevent her from acting out. Same concept here.
Besides that, the most generous interpretation of her videos is that she laughed as a person with whom she shared one soul (as she claims) was running out of oxygen.
The jury saw it all.
Johnny Depp did art and such most of the time. Nothing wrong with it. In fact, it is encouraged for the defendant to leave the work to the attorney's and keep yourself occupied and distracted and calm.
What emotional outburst? I only heard James Owens creating a scene where there was probably only Mrs.Torres beginning to cry over seeing THE suitcase video. Owens completely blew it out of proportion! That poor woman was upset, naturally. Even if it had never happened those videos alone convicted Sarah Boone! And honestly, Owens didn't do Sarah any favors with his questioning of her!!
Exactly. I went back and listened very closely to a video that had enhanced audio. I heard what sounded like a muffled cough just before Owen's spoke. In Owens' attempt to blow this up bigger than it was, he admitted that the person bent over so the jury couldn't even see her face. 🙄
Heaven forbid a mother watching and listening to her son being murdered by an unhinged maniac woman, and NOT have an emotional reaction!! 😡
Owens is not just doing his job. He's as evil as Sarah!
Jorge's Mom was upset at seeing a snuff film of her son's murder
@XiaoFury If the jury saw him do that, which how could they not, it almost has to have hindered his case.
OMG.... She's going to Prison, she killed her BF...GEEZ...THEY NEED TO STOP IT ALREADY!!!
If anyone made a scene it was the defense counsel when during closing he turned around and spoke angrily towards the gallery. Last I heard, you can’t cause your own miss trial.
Jorge's mother quietly left the room. That's nowhere close to an outburst. The only emotional outburst was from Owens.
I get it. Owens was throwing crap at the wall in his attempts to avoid the inevitable verdict, but he didn't request any curative instructions.
He’s a sore loser with anger issues imo.
If Mr Owen’s did not draw attention to the moment, would anyone have even noticed a family member crying (lights off in courtroom, focus was on a video in the opposite area of the courtroom)
Exactly. I suspect that was the point.
I didn’t know he said “I’m asking you to leave the room”. Real class there Owens. Could have shown some compassion.
Yes, I did a rewind when I saw this the first time. I thought he said, "Get those people out of the room." I was stunned. 😮
@@windywednesday4166He did! It was unnecessary and rude
I think I despise Owen’s almost as much as I do Sara!! Owen’s is a terrible lawyer. These cases have nothing to do with Sarah’s case. Not even close!! Denied!!!
Owens was unnecessarily cruel and that is unforgivable. A mother is watching her baby die which is likely the most pain anyone can go through and instead of compassion, he admonished her for having normal human emotion. Frankly, no one would even have noticed had Owens not made a spectacle of it to suit his own devious ends. He is truly despicable.
Sarah and Owens are both horrible people. For shame. objecting to a family member's grief after Sarah killed George and they both know it.
Yes, strike three!! We did not hear any outburst, it was not until the cameras turned to the gallery that we even noticed something had happened! I actually thought there was a problem with the stream because the suitcase video seemed to have frozen as it went quite for a couple of seconds. The cameras would have picked up the audio of this "outburst" and we would have heard it. It seems all Mrs Torres wanted to do was leave the courtroom but had to go past of the people to the exit the room. It was probably Mr Owens or someone else who brought it to the court's attention, otherwise I doubt it anyone would have noticed.
To be fair, “we” weren’t there and Boone /lawyer were.
Exactly. The first time I saw this I went back and listened very carefully. I heard something that sounded like a muffled cough just before Owen's spoke. In Owens tirade later he even admitted that the person head bent over double... that means the jury would not have been aware or influenced by their facial features. It's also not the first time Sarah has prodded Owens into having a go at people she didn't want in the gallery. 😮
@ True not in person, but it was televised and streamed live. We were even aware of someone’s phone going off at some point during the trial when the judge ordered them out! There were reporters inside the courtroom including Joel from Surviving The Survivor who didn’t initially notice anything and said someone was sobbing in the arms of a friend or family member leaning into them for support (it was confirmed later it was Mrs Torres) hardly the outburst described by Mr Owens. But I get your point .
I was just reading the comments here and generally, they indicate that you just have an exceptional ability to connect with people, even through a computer screen. Who knew that there are scores of people that want to know the deep details of judicial opinions? You, Brother Counsel, figured it out and have carved out this corner of the world that brings so much to your viewers.
There was a comment on a different Brother Counsel video where the person wrote that they weren't very highly educated, hadn't gone to high school, but they understood Brother Counsel's presentations. I got a little choked up reading that. Connections, and more connections!
Thanks! Looking forward to many more. 😊
Thank you Brother Counsel for doing superb research! Owens throwing spaghetti at the wall again
Not to mention the lights in the courtroom were out and there was a video being played in the front of the courtroom. It is very likely that the jury didnt even notice any disturbance until Owens made his own outburst to acknowledge there were people leaving the room
Exactly. My understanding is that Detective Chelsea was sitting with the family and I suspect it was really bugging Sarah! She's so petty and spiteful.
@windywednesday4166 I just hope the judge absolutely throws the book at her and locks her up for life....I doubt it but hey at least she didn't take the plea deal that would have had her out in approx 8 years
@@PH13PH I think the judge will be very fair and considered, as he has been throughout, and will, with great elegance and class, read her for the filth she is, and sentence her to something like 30 years to life, or 40 years to life. One less reason to appeal, and absolutely fair. Means she MAY stand a chance at parole... one day. When she's a very elderly woman. But, and this is crucial, she'd never, ever qualify for parole, even as a woman in her 70s, since she'd never accept responsibility or show remorse. So it will be effectively be a life sentence, without being classed as over sentencing her, since a minimum of 30 years is more than fair, and gives her the very faint hope of freedom one day. Something her victim certainly never had. I won't complain if he gives her life either!
He has been very systematic, thoughtful and intelligent at every stage, making sure to close every avenue of objection or potential appeal issues, pushing this through to trial to stop the mockery of justice she was attempting, and being very careful and deliberate in the way he did so. So I have every faith that he's going to make sure that not only does she not get away with her nonsense, but also not set up precedents where future criminals can play with the court system the way she has been, and so she stands almost zero chances of an appeal being successful.
@@scarletamazon3455 honestly this whole time I have just been feeling like it is going to be a 30 year sentence. One thing to note though. Sarah is currently 47 years old. 30 years would make her 77. I do not believe she will make it to that age. Life expectancy in prison is quite a bit lower than out in the real world. Not to mention her past history of heavy drinking. So yes effectively a life sentence. I agree she wouldn't be a great candidate for people because of the factors you mentioned. I just want to hear what kraynick has to say. After watching this trial I think he is one of the best judges I have seen lately. Very fair and intelligent.
@@PH13PH I agree with you on all points! Although I don't think it'll be as clear cut as "just" 30 years. I think it'll be a minimum of '30 years to life', so she know very clearly that it'll be at least 30 years, and her reaching 77 years old, before she could even apply for parole, that she would never get, even if she did manage to live that long (and I agree, her chances of making it to that age given her lifestyle factors, both current and previous, & family history are also incredibly slim!
So I'm bracing for a minimum of '30 years to life', knowing I'll still be pleased with and see the justice in that, and have every confidence he'll have carefully considered every factor before he hands down the sentence. I'm thinking he may actually go with a minimum of 40 years to life. The "to life" part will allow him to hammer on the fact she has shown absolutely zero empathy or remorse, poses a danger to the public, still, as a result, and stands no chance of freedom unless and until she takes accountability and shows remorse. We all know, judge Kraynick especially, that she never will, and she will be tormented by that years away tiny flicker of hope of MAYBE getting out. One day. When very elderly, if she makes it that long, and ONLY if, she does the thing she's been so set against doing all these years, and demonstrate some accountability and remorse.
It'll be yet another thing where she'll only have herself to blame, when she is never fit for release, and won't even adapt to accepting she'll be in there until the day she expires. That tiny, vanishingly small chance of a potential release, but only under those circumstances, and so far into the future, will torment her even more than a flat out life sentence will. ;-)
The man was asked at every point in the whole process for legal argument and he failed at every single point.
I appreciate he's following procedures but he could at least have put a bit more effort into it and not treated the Court with such disrespect
The issue with the emotional outburst argument is while there was some outburst and the family then left the courtroom the record really does not reflect that this issue was so bad as to prejudice the defendant Sarah Boone. While James Owens ask for them to leave the courtroom, he did not immediately ask for a sidebar to develop the record or ask for an immediate curative statement. Rather he asked them to leave and they left thus he got the remedy he asked for. Thus his own cure happened
Imo "outburst" is much too strong a word... but point well taken! Not only did that 'cure' the emotions issue that Owens had a problem with, iirc the judge asked him if he wanted a Curative statement given to the jury and he declined it.
For Pete sake, it was Owens, who caused the big commotion, not George’s relative. I was disgusted by his reaction.
Even when Owens cites case law, he fails spectacularly. What an ineffective lawyer he is. Owens must've got his law degree from a box of cereal.
sounded like Owens said "I'm going to ask you to get out" maybe I'm wrong but I listened twice
Yes, that's what I hear. ❤
He did say that and they were already leaving. Just being the horrid man he is
The outburst was not all that loud, and the woman was helped out of the courtroom by a family member. James Owen jumped up and was, as we say in the south, very ugly. I was shocked at his outburst, which was considerably louder than Georgia’s relatives outburst.
Enjoying your analytical and educational videos!
Glad to hear it!
That clown Owens threw the mother of all hissy fits when Jorge’s poor, heartbroken Mother sobbed when she heard her son’s voice call for help.
He is a very certain kind of low life imo snd Karma will get him good.
My heart breaks for the family
Mr owens rant was unhinged and all that angry pointing incredibly rude. Sarah has not displayed any particular emotions throughout the trial. She just wrote notes and did constant lip compressions. However after years of heavy drinking, smoking and a poor diet, she is probably not fully compos mentis. There was no excuse for what Owens did to the Torres family. Also of note is calling Jorge an alledged victim. Disgusting.
Agreed. Owens was all too happy to further victimize the Torres family. Jorge's poor mother. I cannot imagine what that moment was like for her to watch her baby die and then to be treated so cruelly by Owens. He's just deplorable.
Those cases are not similar to the Boone case in any way, imo.
Jay put on record that mom was crying and did the right thing and left.
I hope Kraynick gets offended and puts her away for life.
I often remind myself that Owens is just doing his job. However, I really dislike that he called Jorge the “alleged” victim. He is dead, he is a victim. No matter who they believe is at fault or why, Jorge is a victim.
I am almost as fascinated by Owen's thought process as Sarah's. What kind of logic is he using with these examples? Is Sarah providing the cases to him?
It's Margaret. Darn that Margaret.
@doom4067 dammit Margaret!!!!
I suspect that Sarah is driving this bus and Owens is scrambling to find the laws to back it up.
Wonder how Owens would feel if it was his child ! That is not an outburst….. he s so disgusting, he s a sexist, and rude, ffs people are human you may think you cam cope with something then you cant she got up and left, she didnt scream out, he s just as vile as his client
exactly! Both Looney's Boone and Owens expect them to sit there frozen. Boone too if it were Lukas that was murdered she wouldn't be able to handle it. The family did nothing wrong like you they didnt scream out or curse at her which they have every right to but they still respected the court proceedings. I hope Judge Kraynick gives her extra years in prison for every bogus filing! Even his family didnt react and walked the verdict would had been the same! she's so freakin annoying I'm tired of her! GO AWAY chuntara!
Completely agree 💯
She is unbelievably delusional
No, for sure not delusions. They are illusions. The difference is that the illusion is actively constructed by the narcissist whereas the delusion happens to an ill person. Narcissists are responsible.
Yes, but that doesn't bother me as much as how petty and spiteful she is.
Remember Travis Alexanders family ran out of the room crying.when autopsy photos were shown? Everyone understood and NO ONE took issue with it. I imagine its very common, this sort of thing. Can you imagine if her motion were granted, what a terrible precedant that would set...?
Thanks for reviewing the cited cases! Very interesting to see the cases used to back up the motions.
I remember Cherish’s case but never watched the trial. Heartbreaking. Oh Lord
Tell her to take responsibility for what she did. She will use any ploy to stay in the limelight. The family have a right to be upset. She needs a hefty sentence and locked away forever.
Thanks BC!
Seems to me the only ones to ask people to leave the courtroom should be the judge and the deputies.
It is so great to get your commentary and analysis on these legal issues-you are unique among the utube lawyers, thank you so much
Thanks!!
I'm more and more relieved after your breakdowns of this motion for mistral. First I was angry. Then slightly anxious because judge kraynick has not swiftly responded ( I'm not critiquing the judge) but I hate to think that owens has any leverage at all
The judge isn't going to reverse his own decisions. This is all to set up her unsuccessful appeal.
I didnt know Owen's asked them to leave the room. Does he even have that right??? 😳 Every motion he makes isnt even well thought out.
100%
I don't know if it's misconduct as a counselor, but definitely misconduct as a human freaking being. You could see the rage in his eyes. It was disgusting.
How hard is it for a jury to understand that the family of a victim is likely to be extremely upset by the fact, but this does not by itself mean that the defendant caused the harm?
This is ridiculous.
What is mind boggling is that S. truly believed the jury would acquit her once SHE told her version of the story. So convinced that she rejected the plea deal. I think they really did believe his death was unintentional...that both were battered partners What a gift!!!! But no, S. is incapable of accountability
.. long story short, S., theres your jail cell to the right..dont wear it out!!!!!😮
😂😂😂
Love your channel, Brother Counsel and all the detailed explanations you gave on the other cases, (especially) last one. Owens asked Nick’s family to leave the court room cause of his mother’s outburst. What outburst? We could hardly hear her but Judge K. did. No mistrial!!!
Jorge Torres' mother was in court for the first time. She had been warned that the "suitcase" video would be played. His mom had not seen or listened to the video, so it was the first time she saw this. She had stated she believed she could handle it, but hearing her son begging for his life, proved to much. She cried out and almost collaped on the floor. Her family helped her up and she immediately left the courtroom.
BS his family is so normal. If his mother needed to leave the courtroom it is her right. I am outraged that with all the 100"s of thousands of dollars spent on this narcissist is shameful.
I can NOT fathom Owens objecting + now trying to get a new trial bc of pure raw, MOMMA emotion! Mom Torres was viewing her baby BEG for his life….1st time she saw it! 💔💔
Sounded like Owens said “ I’m gonna ask the jury leaves the room”
Owen’s is throwing the kitchen sink, at this case, to impress Suitcase Sarah.
Idk if it's too impress her or just to pacify her and get her to the end of the case. Sentencing December 2nd. ❤
@@windywednesday4166 She has been at the end of the case🤣Suitcase
Loving your in-depth coverage on this case, Brother. I've watched every video by dreading on Sarah Boone and your vids feel like the perfect case law supplement.
Thanks!
I can listen to you break down all these motions all day. Thanks for clarifying everything to us lay people.
Why thank you!
The only thing that prejudiced the jury was Sarah Boone herself with her testimony
And her videos. Lets face it, all the "evidence" she collected on her phone hoping to prove she was Jorge's victim, only highlighted that the abuser in that relationship was always her. Everything on her phone, plus the police bodycams for arrest and interviews, was more than enough evidence for an M2 conviction, even if she never took the stand. But she certainly helped to demonstrate precisely how evil, remorseless and utterly lacking in any human empathy she is.
Dang it. I miss the live stream again. Thank you BC for taking the time to research and explain the ongoing saga with suffering Saint Sarah of Samsonite and her side kick.
I just started watching your channel! Thank you for your work you do, you do the homework instead of just talking to talk about the case, you contribute and dig into the fact and case law!
Thanks!
If this is the best Owens can do, then he is very bad at his job.
he did well with the bad facts he had.
Owens is pretty experienced, and it sounds like he should know better than to file these with weak or poor case support. Why is he doing this or approaching this this way?
My guess is that the only sure way to get Sarah through the trial is with a lawyer, and that lawyer has to do whatever she wants. Imo, Sarah just wants to be petty and spiteful and pull power trips, and that leaves Owens scrambling to come up with the legal premise to back it up. Much like he used his motion on Miranda rights to get detective Chelsea on the stand to try to dress her down.
He's a small town plea negotiator. He's demonstrating how well that translates to medium city trial lawyer.
Part of me wonders if he is trolling Sarah and she is not intelligent enough to notice.
@@PrometheanRising Yes, I'm of the same mind. Also, you see it in the comments over and over again about how his arguments backfire.
It's procedural. He is required as he is representing her and more likely she demanded it.
Great to see your numbers increasing. Such great analysis.
your right, that was rough, but i enjoyed this series dealing with boone case law !!!
I appreciate you providing interpretations of laws ive learned a lot thank you
Boone is such a dope😂
Ther is one issue that did not get addressed in this video that i am curious about.
When the incident happened Owens did not address his concern to the court. Owens turned around to the gallery and took control of the perceived situation by asking them to leave.
Wouldn't that be a concern of the court that Owens took control of the situation and implemented a resolution without consulting the court first??
What kind of implications does that have on a trial or a lawyer?
❤ Thank you. Again, I'm really glad you broke this into small parts. It's much easier to digest that way. ❤ That case law was brutal. Was there no other case law that Owens could have sighted?! 😮
Oh my Sarah is truly delusional.
At no point does or has she taken any responsibility for your crime.
The mearer fact she is concerned about an emotional outburst from family is unhinged.
Sarah time to take responsibility
IMO Owens made a stink because SB made sure he did. She wouldn’t tolerate Jorge’s family expressing any human emotion that solidified Jorge’s pain and suffering as her victim in his last moments, Owens and SB were made for each other.
The story about Cherish really upset me.
So basically every case they cited doesn’t apply ?
Sarah needs to go away.
He's just like her. I see why he wanted to defend her.
I have to say though why on earth would you get a mother to identify photos like that, thats so unnecessary she will never get those images out of her head, totally different to the Looney Booney case
I thought the same! It can only have been a calculated move by the prosecution to elicit that reaction from the mother to affect the jury! I suspect there would have been a guilty verdict without this tactic, it was cruel and unnecessary!
Yes, I wondered the same thing. It was completely unnecessary. I'm also wondering why all of Owens case law are so gruesome and undefensible.
@ yeah i thought the same
At first I side eyed the case law all being about girls being SA’d but thought, “well it’s all they could find for their lame motion”, but then to mention the second one and say it doesn’t relate to us anyway makes me mad. Especially knowing about Owens’ co-counsel.
Owens is doing the best he can for his client. That's it. He's doing his job by zealously advocating for his client. I have the utmost respect for the guy..
He's a typical defence attorney clutching at straws because his client is clearly delusional.
I wonder if Henderson’s daughter wrote some or all of the motions. She passed the bar prior to trial.
If she's smart she's staying as far away from Owens as possible.
I think she did. We know Owens can’t site case law. At least she tried
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the jury listening to a man begging his girlfriend for his life while he suffocates is already aware of how horrific it must be for the family whether they say something or not. Even if his mother had thrown herself to the floor weeping, I don't think it's going to change anything for the jury. They're listening to a woman castigate a man who is in the process of a slow and terrible death. I wouldn't be surprised if Owens was trying to set up a reason to ask for a mistrial. If it really was one, he should have asked for it right then.
The outburst was not. Sarah just doesn't know them.
Of the five motions, this is the most desperate. There was no emotional outburst. Jorge's mother broke down watching her son dying a brutal and tortuous death. She quietly left with dignity speaking not a word. Owens made no request to address the jury who was already instructed that sympathy for either party has no merit in their decision making. This is a heartless motion that will only bring more pain and anguish to Jorge's family. Absolutely despicable!
Owens is a scumbag and a two-bit lawyer from a one horse town. I really wish someone would do a video on his and Henderson's SA allegations by multiple victims which forced them out of the PD's office. It is truly gross and disturbing preying on their vulnerable clients and one of them almost got disbarred as a result. Owens is not in the same league as Jay and Cacciatore, or on the same planet as Kraynick and it astounds me how disrespectful he was. A lizard and his client got their just desserts.
I suspect that there are a lot of lawyers who watch Brother Counsel. We appreciate that you actually look at the case law. I've been disappointed that Owens' motions are so weak and so poorly supported. He was a PD for many years and you would think that he would be better versed in the case law and would not cite cases that are not on point. (Not because I think that Boone should get a new trial or should have been acquitted. The case against her was overwhelming.)
17:14 I followed the Perrywinkle case and what that doctor had to view/testify to, Im surprised all she needed was a small break and Ill just leave it at that. 20:18 JFC. Is everyone just supposed to be emotionless when viewing horrific things. Isn't the jury going to view these images. 21:21 I was watching it on EDB and we couldn't even hear the outburst at all. It was Owens who called attention to it and they were already leaving the courtroom. I think this made the defense and Owens in particular look very cruel, not just to us but to the jury. A mother was watching her son, someone she gave birth to not only take his final breaths, but begging/pleading for help with Sarah mocking and laughing at him. Not to mention he didn't even ask for any jury instructions. The judge can't rule on something that he didnt make a motion on. He asked for a mistrial and thats it.
Owens made more of it than needed ,it was a intake of breath and she dropped her head , owens screamed at them to get out , if anything he made it worse than it was ,on video you could hardly hear it .
I cannot believe he used the Periwinkle murder case. Sorry, but I think he intentionally used that case due to the national outrage over it. I didn't dislike this defense attorney until now.
You mispronounce "erred". It's e not i. As in "her".
This flimsy mistrial motion is just yet more of Sarah Boone's delusional ranting. I really don't think it merits this much attention.
Brother Counsel the only thing the poor mother did was start quietly sobbing while watching the video of her son taking his last breaths and asking for help. The family immediately got up to escort her from the courtroom. It wouldn’t have swayed the jury at all in my opinion because by that point they already knew she was guilty of murder. Owens is the one in the wrong here. He likes to point and talk loudly and cause issues that aren’t even issues.
Owens would defend D.Brooks, Schabusiness, Lori Vallow and Co. Hitler even. The ONLY redemptive value would be if he, like Nurmi, threw the fight. Its possible...do a terrible job on purpose...reacting to the moms reaction would make everyone LESS likely to be pro S.B
Reword your headline 👎
You talk too fast!
There are a number of options at your disposal:
1. Change the playback speed to a pace that suits you
2. Follow along with the transcript provided in the description box
3. Turn on captions
Any of those or in combination might be useful. Cheers! Have a good day!
Owens did not need to be so cruel to get his point across.
And heartless Boone wrote the entire time. Wow. She has no soul.