Watch This Before You Buy the Nikon Coolpix P1000
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- Buy the P1000 here: amzn.to/2R9pB9I
Remote for the P1000: amzn.to/2Oh0x1T
TRIPOD I use fr the P1000- amzn.to/31YQgdT
Panasonic FZ80 (1200mm zoom): amzn.to/2Qh5ftF
Watch my review on the Panasonic FZ80: • ZOOM ZOOM Panasonic FZ...
Aperture range is f2.8-f8. ISO for video is 125-6400 and for photo is 100-6400. The camera CAN be used while the battery is charging!
Hands on review with the new Coolpix P1000 by Nikon. The P1000 has a 3000mm zoom!! You can literally see the rings on Saturn and zoom in on other stars and whatever else you can imagine.
![TOP 5 Best Superzoom Camera [ 2024 Buyer's Guide ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Vwvx53Hc_Wo/mqdefault.jpg)
Get the most powerful zoom on the market here - amzn.to/2Q6WHaa
no thanks. rather get a real telescope (oh wait, i already do!)
Hugh Mongus does it take cool pictures?
@@hedone13x the camera attached to it does.
@@hughmongus1233 what camera, and what telescope? Do these two cost less or higher than Nikon alone? Appreciate the answer!
@@JAVC1962 there are lots of combos
The P1000: for people who want to do macro Street photography, but don't want to leave the home!
You predicted the future
Me! Hahaha.
Haha! Lockdown heaven!
The ideal "corona camera"
@@jpsholland Corona camera !!!dead 💀 🤣 😂 😳
I am waiting for Nikon P5000 to see all planets and stars clearly.
Nikon P5100 exactly
@akhi Sinha
When the time come to see the mars clearly with your cam.. you'll heard "astronauts" say "oh we used to go mars in seconds but unfortunately we destroyed that technology and it's hard to build it again" loool
I heard rumors that the image of the black hole was captured on the Nikon p5000 concept.
@@SagaciousDjinn are you sure? loool
@@GabrieLight *Sarcastically replies* Oh yeah, definitely positive about that one. Oh boy, oh boy, I'm definitely not fibbing around.
I was given the P1000 as a christmas gift.
Its limitations are easy tondeal with as prior I was using my Nikon D3200 with a Tamron 150mm-600mm lens, a lot of weit to lug around all day, the P1000 is a joy!
The biggest issue I have is it needs a higher pixel count as 16mp is very restrictive.
16mp is fine for Facebook, Instagram and image prints up to a reasonable amount. I've seen some fabulous images from a few that own this camera, albeit the weight gives me hesitation on purchasing it.
With a camera like this, no UFO will pass unnoticed...
but youll still gonna Record them with your shaky 1990's camera
ufo does not exist... There is no clear video with ufo =)))
@@NucleaR_EFECT Depends on what you mean by ufo. There are a bunch of videos of ufo but that doesnt mean there are solid photographical evidence of aliens. I have seen ufo's two times myself only caught it on my iphone from about 1km away and that is the very reason i am looking at this camera. Google hessdalen lights thats where i saw it.
@@Martin-nv3qh where are you from ??
NucleaR_EFECT Norway not far from hessdalen
Telescope with a camera and with a really good zoom. Sounds like what I want.
I have the FZ80 and it's great that you showed the difference side by side. Great review ! You have got me thinking of the P1000 a lot, the next thing I need to do is to figure out how to steal my own money to buy it without being noticed by my wife.
me too
Same
I was able to shoot the highest quality at 2400mm, and if you turn on super zoom mode with 4 megapixels, you can get up to ~9300mm which is 489x optical+digital zoom. Not sure if the P1000 is able to do this, but FZ80's price point, battery life and light weight is a win for me with 1/3 of the price :D
WAS THAT SATURN? YOU TOOK A PHOTO OF SATURN? SOLD!
No... it was video 😀
I took video of Saturn with a p900, not as clear or as zoomed in, but yes, it's a thing I've personally experienced.
@@SmartGadgetShow Easy fix. Go thru the video frame by frame for the best one, crop it as a photo. It's a life hack I used with my p900 all the time with wildlife photography, more so with birds. They're so skiddish and hyper, and I few shots don't cut it in comparison to hundreds of potential "photos" that lie hidden in a video.
you can see jupiter and it's moons too
Why does Saturn look like a really obvious optical illusion?
I'm an amateur photographer and I was using my Sony xperia z1phone i dropped it. Hmm 😕
I was suggested I have a look at Nikon cool pix 1000 if I enjoy talking photographs. Wow! I'm impressed! Now my vision and this unit are ONE!
Thank you for the introduction. Love the camera.
Think seriously about it before spending all that money.. Do you really need a super zoom camera? What type of photography are you looking to do? There are some great cameras out there for nowhere near the price of this Nikon super zoom. Do you want to do street photography? Or do you wish to do, micro photography, or night shots? For example, I have the Fujifilm Finepix s99OOW with a 50x zoom.
I hardly ever use that zoom facility though, as I am more interested in taking shots of the subjects I have just mentioned. The s99OOW is nowhere near the price of the Nikon displayed, yet it takes stunning shots. I know what type of photography I want to do so that is half the battle won. So, as I said, before you spend all that money on a camera whose zoom facility you may not even use, think seriously about what type of photography you wish to produce.
I have one and love it. It is not superb in everything but ticks most of the boxes for what I need. Some suggestions...have a sturdy tripod and spend the money to get a lens support extension. The camera is nose heavy fully extended. Buy the remote control. In video mode it is slow to auto focus so pan slowly. As said here low light is a problem. Shooting wildlife at a distance is awesome ...suggestion have a sunny day to shoot. It has a preset mode for birds and works well for that purpose....suggestion make sure bird is not in an area with a lot of shade ISO 400 and below or you will get some noise. If you go to Flickr you can see my shots under Fred Fleming.
The record limit is because of Tax laws, in quit a few Countries... Over 30min is Considered a MOVIE Camera, so it's a Different Tax Base, More Taxes...
Really?
That's complete idiocy. I'm willing to bet it's the EU since all they do these days is pass ridiculous laws.
Yes, my iPhone is definitely a movie camera.
@Angelo Cella Back in 2006, the EU controversially decided to classify high-end digital cameras as video recorders, which attached a customs duty of 5-12% for digital cameras imported into Europe. The classification was decided not just based on digital cameras' improving abilities to record video through its lens and sensor, but their ability to record direct input from external sources like televisions. A home video recorder tax would theoretically offset money lost from users recording movies off broadcast television or cable onto digital devices, though the EU has never been very clear on the tax's intent. The tax's consequence, though, has been felt in every digital camera user looking to use a DSLR in place of a camcorder, as camera manufactures would rather limit recording capability in software than raise the price of its cameras (or lower their margins).
Where in the world would any cinema be recorded as one whole single movie file? Jeez
Great camera-still using the P900-would love the P1000📷
I'll purchase your P900
I'm serious!!!!
I’m liking the P950 lately
Love Nikon cameras, they have always been the best.
my *Panasonic* also does good with the *ZOOM*
ua-cam.com/video/rsv5Uy4c2Vc/v-deo.html
The Zoom isn't as far reaching as the P1000 but it's alot more *STEADY* a M̤̈Ä̤Ẍ̤ zoom
excellent review and great footage and photos- Saturn blew me away!- thanks for posting!
It’s a cool idea, and I think this will make a perfect casual camera for astronomers and earth scientists (saying this as a planetary science major). But everything other than the lens just isn’t good enough if you can only get one camera. I got a Sony RX10IV as my one-camera-for-all solution, and I still think it’s the best out there for anyone who just wants to carry one camera everywhere. The zoom on it is also pretty great and IMO more practical.
Thanks very useful info.... I'll look into that one too.....
The "perfect... For astronomers and earth scientist".. Says is perfectly 👌
RX10IV is double the price of this camera. lmao weird flex, dude.
If you get too much zoom, you will start to be able to see distortions caused by the air refraction. So although the P1000 has an incredible zoom, you’re very much gonna get the same stuff with the Panasonic FZ80 because the zooming is just enough before the distortion ruins your image.
Random RimRock that’s what these amateurs don’t get. Close is everything. You’d be much better off figuring how to get closer.
@@the_original_skytiger Right, you know the situation of everyone on the planet the best. Everyone else is stupid.
@@pekarna Just quit whining and get closer. You'll see I'm right.
I just got the P1000 in the mail yesterday. Planning on taking it out this afternoon. Thank you for sharing this video.
Great camera. How are you getting on with it?
@@UFO-Ark This is the 3rd time I have responded to your question. The reply button keeps disappearing. I am simply exhausted.
@@UFO-Ark I have been out in the countryside for several hours trying to get the P1000 to work. Simple things like ISO, Aperture, and Shutter speed could not be set without great difficultly.
@@UFO-Ark The P1000 is not functional. Too many error and software difficulties. A decent photographer should not have to put up with what I went through today. I took 60 pictures and they were absolutely lousy. Settings could not be adjusted. Settings would disappear.
Being able to see Saturn is just ridiculous. I had a Canon 600D the last time :D
Or just get a cheap dobson telescope for the 600D. Images will be immensely better.
@@KP3droflxp P1000 is the favorite camera of the flat earthers. They cannot focus it on any celestial object and use this as a "proof" that stars and planets are fake.
@@KP3droflxpmake sure you also get a camera adapter
Great review! I was really interested in getting one but out of curiosity I went and look around in the pre-owned market and see if there's any P900 for sale. I found myself a like-new condition P900 at less than half the price of a new P1000. Sure, it lacks the 3000mm zoom but 2000mm is also fantastic. Much smaller and lighter too.
Man that zoom is incredible
I was thinking of one of these, just for a toy really, but of all the things they improved over the P900, not putting in a bigger sensor was just daft, going to have to give it a miss. As the P900 is half the price, and the zoom is still 2000mm, i might pick up one of those, just for some zooooom fun :).
I have a P900 it does the job well. I don't consider the P100 worth double the cost. I bought a circular polarizer and a solar filter for it and I very pleased with what I can do with the P900
I had a p900 and now have a p1000, the sensor works fine.
All this P-1000 talk drew me to look into the P-900. I’m gonna pick one of those up too. :) $599 here where I live.
Bigger sensor would be impossible without massively increasing the weight, and price.
I use a lumix gf3 with a 100-300mm that's a 200mm-600mm equivalent, or I can use an adapter and use my sigma 150-600 That's 300-1200mm equivalent, but with that set up and weight, plus no image stabilisation it has to be used on a tripod.
Lumix gf 3 is a micro 4/3rds system.
I guess it could be done with a 1inch sensor but it'd be 4 times the weight and twice as long and cost a few thousand bucks.
It's made at a price point to sell, designing it isn't the main issue, it's trying to sell it, who would buy a 1 inch sensor camera with a 25-2000mm equivalent lens that weighs 4kg and cost 3-$4,000..
Even at this price they'd need to be able to sell a lot to be worth the cost of development and manufacturing of it.
The P900 is damn good for what it Is, the p1000 I don't think will sell that well, the kind of people who buy these types of bridge cameras aren't the type who want to pay that kind of money for it.
It needs to drop down to around $700 ... £600ish before it starts selling in any great numbers
I think it will drop to around 700 after 12 months, it's new so price is high, i was trying to find the launch price of the P900 so see how much it had come down by since launch (if any). The 1/2.3 sensor is about a crop factor of 6, which is as you have said why the zoom is so large, put in a bigger sensor and the zoom would have to be redesigned, maybe not much heavier, but larger yes.
As for price, yeah a £1000 (in the UK) is way to much for the performance of a mobile phone camera in terms of sensor.
Glad you mentioned so many details, particularly that the camera cannot be used while charging
The camera can be used while charging. That was a mistake.
Ah lol
I do bird photography as a hobby. Now I use a nikon d200 and a tamron lens 500mm. Quality is great but many times I wished I had more zoom. I think Ill get this
@_Addiction_ I fucked allah last night. It was a good time
At 0:55 I almost misheard when he said " its like double the size of my pen......asonic"
So I wasn’t the only one who heard this 😂
Same with me. I thought i heard it wrong 😆
The P stands for PERV 😂
P E R V O N E T H O U S A N D
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
😯 Hey, you might be right.
😂😂😂😂
Thats what we call " scumbag zoom "
aside from my current Nikon Coolpix B700 that's capable of zooming in to the moon clearly, i am more thrilled to have this P1000 or P5000!
The cons are not enough to dissuade me from getting one. Awesome camera. Thanks!
I looked at this and ended up getting the Lumix FZ-1000. The image quality is better, as is the weight. The only thing the Nikon gives you is the zoom, and the Lumix does just fine with its zoom. The Nikon zoomed in shows too much wobble. The 20.1 sensor is much nicer on the Lumix, as well. If you buy the monster, you'll be fighting the weight, the smaller sensor, the noise and other things. I don't think this will be on the market much longer.
hmm... 3000mm equiv. lens and it's still not enough to fill Saturn in the whole frame.
I would like to see a 10000-20000mm equiv. lens in the next model if that's possible :)
That's ridiculous and unrealistic
He might have been joking :)
i believe u can see american flag on the moon with "made in china" tag on it.. :)
The transparency of the air is the real limit for amateur astrophotography. Professionals have the Hubble for it.
You are NOT going to get Saturn to fill the frame with ANY Earth based camera or telescope. The aperture needed would be miles wide. You will need Voyager or Cassini.
Even with its cons its still impressive kit
You can buy external battery chargers and spare batteries. I’ve never used the wall charger.
I used to own FZ80. It's a very capable camera. I could shoot with one hand while drinking my coffee!
Anyone catching UFOs with this?
They only capture video of UFOs on a potato camera
Best travel camera, I borrowed one when I went on safari, it bought me face to face with lions with out being eaten.
Liked the Panasonic's footage better at full extension as it seemed more usable, when I was shopping for a super zoom, I decided on Canon's as it was light and the colors seemed more natural
Humans: We invented a new zoom cam!
Aliens: Holy shit! We really have to hide now!
1:31 you don't get the power of that extra 2K of glass, unlit you watch or miss that flying bird or biker on this scene.
Nice review and 2 TUs.
This is a proper digital binocular!
I use this to film planes spraying chemicals in the stratosphere
You can see them switch it off and on.. you can’t do that with normal “contrails” 😎
thank you so much for sharing this information sir,i was so empress of your vedeo.
anyways what i am dreaming to buy is the nikon coolpix b500 to use for vlogging.
i cannot afford this kind of nikon.
This thing is literally as big (zoomed out) like my RF 800 F11 FULL FRAME LENS.
And the "zoom" i can get is anywhere between 2000 and 2500mm (R7s 1,6x APS-C crop= 800*1,6= 1280mm, with digital stabilizer its about 1500-1600mm. Full nuts/zoom in about 4K crop mode is additional 1,9x crop, add digital stabilizing with 1,2x crop and im also at about 3000mm.
And if im desperate enough i can also hook up the R7 on my 1200mm 8" or fast, photographic 750mm 6" newton telescope (F4 aperture), go in 1080p24 or 30fps mode and enable digital zoom. Like this i can go at the pixel level (32MP APS-C, nice zoom) and record slightly upscaled 1080p with about 4500-5000mm on the 750mm newton and UNUSABLE (literally!) 7000-8000mm (since i dont have a tracked/guided mount for the big newton, just a dobson mount for visual planetary/moon observation
Effective 1200mm with 32MP are already a nightmare to track/guide with "only" (literally only, its entry level) 600$ mount and tripod and at best usable with video stacking, but 3000mm+ are reserved for BIG, super expensive telescopes/observatories (when it comes to imaging)
At all... this video stuff works well for planets and moon, but any faint object needs GOOD TRACKING/GUIDING and exposure times of 1 minute at least!
As long as they have a real viewfinder. I have a nikon coolpix s9900 that only has a screen. In bright light, you can't see what you are shooting.
Might not get an answer, but what is the slowest zoom speed possible on this camera?
Thanks for your honest opinion am thinking twice of buying this camera but would have been nice if this camera can take the full resolution for moving objects.
Magnum PI loves this
Been looking to get one from John Lewis. Great camera quality.
Thank you, I have an opportunity to get one of these for 450 dollars. I think that's a good deal.
I complained to the company about the distance and they said if the world wasn’t round I’d see a lot further then they told me point it at the moon and see if I could see that clear and far in line with land, they are right
Nice review - P1000 would be a good successor to the P900 - but I really miss the GPS, an important feature on travels!
Single biggest drawback to this is the aperture range, an F8 fixed aperture on a 3000mm lens is just not going to cut it. If your using it for snapshots it is no big deal, but for anything that you want to have a bit of depth of field to, F8 is not going to get you there. Too bad, they fixed most of the issues with the P900 except for the critical one.
why would you ever want that on a niche superzoom camera?
i get quite nice DoF with the P1000 at max zoom.. have you even owned this camera?
Albert Jackson ... You should research and learn about depth of field.
That's what I thought too.
Thanks for this demonstration .. you showed how to take pictures with Snapbridge but can we take videos?
Wow i never knew this camera existed. Its huge and looking like a pro dslr.
I have a P900 and a P1000. I carry my 900 every where I go. Haven't touched the 1000 in months... The 900 is a way better camera, just my opinion.
The P1000 is Crap Royal just like the P900 I can say that with 100% surety because I have them both. They are only fair at ranges from 1 to 60 FT after that you start getting that London Fog Image due to the cheap sensor so SAVE your money and wait to see if a better camera comes to the market
awesome work Jay!
M looking forward to own this however my only concern is the price why is it so cheap for such amazing performance? Does it come with the lens in $800 or just the body.
Its not f2.8 to f11. You have to multiply aperture by crop factor to get equivalent aperture in 35mm
Make a low light test (moon/stars/etc.). I know this camera has a small sensor
Excellent zoom, good analyses👌 nice your voice👌🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
wow thats amazing but for the price i'll stick with my FZ80 so far it has served me well and i am an amateur to say the least but i love that zoom
Which would be better for a college student on a budget first getting into photography? P900 or P1000?
Great video and comparison. Zooms over the horizon and brings boats right back into frame
I love my P900 . I am going to get this cam
imagine this with a teleconverter xd
You'd get f/16 at the maximum zoom though, barely workable in broad daylight, especially considering how bad the sensor is.
i have the p900. Some video show you can still capture Jupiter and Saturn. But what's the setting? All i see is just a blurry white dot that the camera.
One major downside of the Coolpix cameras is that you have to insert the battery into the camera to charge the battery.
Amazing zoom but such bad quality photos! I tend to avoid these as such and stick to more versatile and higher quality lenses, you may not get the impressive 125x zoom range but at least your photos would actually be good enough to work with
Good review, thanks.
Informative review but small revision needed. Review states "only way to charge camera is inside the camera" (using USB cable from wall charger or computer). Not so. From Amazon I bought a " Powerextra 2x EN-EL20a Battery & Car Charger" that charges the battery outside the camera.
3:50 is not strictly true. You can get an extra third-party charger (and batteries) for direct charging through AC.
www.amazon.com/Capacity-Batteries-COOLPIX-Travel-Charger/dp/B07HPZ63Y1/ref=sr_1_4?keywords=Nikon+P1000+batteries&qid=1556813510&s=gateway&sr=8-4
I have found these to be the best and fastest charging www.amazon.com/Wasabi-Power-Battery-EN-EL20a-Blackmagic/dp/B078TP1KLL/ref=sr_1_3?crid=2SU9HPM9DTDJY&keywords=en-el20a+battery+charger&qid=1556813620&s=gateway&sprefix=EN-EL20a%2Caps%2C224&sr=8-3
Pro-tip: to roughly 100% of us, an ultrazoom compact camera is all we ever need. This is damned cool, though.
ɪ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴀɴ inexpensive *PANANSONIC HC-180* with a great zoom❗ Here is a sample video
ua-cam.com/video/rsv5Uy4c2Vc/v-deo.html
Its has *ALL THE ZOOM I* need❗👍🏻
Good job, thanks for sharing.
Nice touch catching that chemtrailing plane at the end!
I cannot believe we have the same name, although my name is without H.
crguti We sure do have cool names 😎
Thanks for this comparison!
Was thinking of upgrading from my FZ80 to the P1000 just for contrail spotting. The P1000 seems also rather soft at max FL, was hopong for better IQ before seeing your review.
Would it be a big step up from FZ80 just for contrails?
Thanks.
One big difference that makes contrails and chemtrails easier to track is the flip out screen. I remember with the fz80 you have to have the camera high so you can view the back or be squatting down a bit (if on a tripod at least) Besides the flip out screen prolly not too much of a difference. I hope some company will come out with something like the p1000 with a much bigger sensor. They prolly won’t. We’ll be able to see too much. Peace.
@@JRESHOW Thanks!
@@JRESHOW What do you mean by "we will be able to see too much" if a bigger sensor is fitted ?
Sweet piece of kit
Can you please tell as to which tripod are you using?
i used to have the fz70 ( basically the same as 80 but no 4k) and then switched to a dslr , i wish the p1000 was my backup driver
Such a huge brick, and still a tiny sensor and bad picture quality (= sharpness, seen in many reviews).
In addition to that, the camera is super-slow (Zoom in and out, Autofocus etc.)
Can you please recommend a tripod for this camera... I have a P900 and i intend to use P1000 for wildlife photography
I’d recommend a heavy duty one. The one I use I linked in the description. It’s a manfrotto
Had this camera for a while. Very happy and useful in all event.
Cons: Zoom in and out not very smooth. And too heavy to carry it around.
Thank you for video and your time..
Is that a UFO you captured after your shot of Mars???
i just bought the super package from Amazon. 5 batteries, 1 year $1,500 warranty, 7 different filters, 2 128GB chips, big light, big microphone. i love it. it should come with 4 wheels and cruise control for what i have to pay for it, but i'm so incredibly happy with it. i have no idea what all the buttons and settings are for, but i'm certainly dedicated to learning. just let me see a UFO with this puppy.
How far do you think the moon really is??? Considering you can focus on it. 100 miles?
Amazing zoom they Best campera!!!
Look at the stars and planets!
Every flat earther dream...
I bought a Nikon P900 a few years back just to take a peep at what my crush is doing whom lives a few blocks away. Now that she's moved to another city, I have the reason to buy this Nikon P1000. 😊😊😊
I guess the lens will suck up dust when zooming in due to change of volume inside
What is the difference between international version to USA version?
Does the manual focus also work when recording videos?
Nice review, been thinking about getting one of these.
Yep, it does :)
@@JRESHOW Nice ! Thanks for the reply ;)
Price?
Camera simply TOO big. TOO bulky. Image quality is poor because of excess noise over ISO of 400. The zoom gets old after a brief break in period and in warm weather, heat waves make excessive image noise extremely aggravating. On cold crisp nights it's fun to take photos of the moon, but after a few nights that gets old.
A better buy would be a Lumix FZ-1000 or better. As someone who's used 1000mm in film days, I know what even mildly warm days do to zoomed in super-telephoto photos. And even the Lumix and Olympus cameras fall victim to this. As someone who uses wide angle lenses far more often than telephoto lenses, I value good quality wide angle and telephoto lenses that don't suffer from pincusion or barrel distortion, and all super-zooms suffer this to a degree. (That's one reason I like larger cameras than small pocket cameras, and the Lumix FZ-1000, Olympus and other good quality cameras.) If someone needs to use a good tripod-mounted camera for video or still photo archetectural use, the Nikon is a great camera. (I have a friend who shoots wedding and funerals, and she needs a good camera that is unobtrusive. But she always looks for signs of heat and other noise that might corrupt her results.)
The Nikon has a lot of glass in it and zooming causes a loud motorized noise that might corrupt ambient sound. Oh, and the Nikon would be much nicer if it had a tripod mount _on the lens_ than on the bottom of the camera. Nikon most likely did this because it felt the lack of camera vibration would allow it and I can see their logic, but for wind and other effects, a lens mount still is a better option.
--
Thx for the great review ! 2 Questions, I was considering the sony rx10 mark 5 for its touch screen to focus feature while recording. Dose the P1000 have this feature ? 2nd, is the image stabilization as good as the Sony? Thx, its cool if unsure.
No touch screen. Stabilization is good, but if you’re going to use the full zoom you’ll want a tripod either way.
Not really into these super zoom cameras. I just want to do photography. I am more interested in black and white street photography, night photography and micro photography too. The super zooms, I feel, are just a gimmick, and, in fact, that would not sell the camera to me. I have a Fujifilm S99OOW, which has a 50x zoom. I hardly use the zoom facility on it. Preferring instead, to concentrate on the pictures I want to take with it that I have mentioned. Ok, my Fujifilm has a small sensor, but, for me, it still produces great shots. Obviously because of the small sensor, the more I blow the picture up the more noise it will produce. That's just the way it is.
However, I stick to a standard size and it is just fine for me. Oh, one more thing, with these bridge cameras, such as the one on display here, if the camera develops a black spot on the sensor, how do you get rid of the spot? Obviously you cannot take off the lens, as it is a bridge camera? So, therefore, if you cannot get rid of the black spot, then the camera becomes a very expensive paperweight.
It’s def. not for everyone. I have Panasonic gx85, gh4, and GH5 and I wanted to get some really zoomed in video and photos of things so this was a really good option at a great price. It’s basically like a telescope but a lot smaller.
So I work at Best Buy and had a guy come in asking if we have this because it proves that the earth is flat
In the words of Jack Black: that’s like a 2000 mile zoom lens!
i need a good videocamera - and its a very very big problem to find good and that cost not many .....
What is the cheapest camcorder capable of high-quality video of the starry sky (the cheapest) ? - but so that was the quality video of stars in the night sky.... Help plz
@@vlad9vt I'm not sure as I stopped being into camcorders after I started using my DSLR for stills and videography years ago. But I can tell you this : it all depends on what you need from a camera. Is it extra zooming? then it's gonna be on the expense of the quality ( sensor ) coz these are the law of physics ( optics ).
Is it gonna be high functionality and lots of mechanical parts in action, then it's gonna be on the expense of battery life and probably camera getting hot to touch.
Also big players are : price , weight , low light shooting , noise , electronic and software compatibility , etc.
I think some hours spent researching and asking high-tech people would give you satisfying answers!
Good luck :)
Se ve espectacular
Excellent review !