The French Defense According to the Dojo | GM Jesse Kraai

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 чер 2024
  • Want to learn how to play the French Defense? ChessDojo has developed a new way to learn openings! At the 1200-1800 level we focus not on memorization but concepts, sparring and opening specific tactics. Want to learn more? Welcome to the Dojo! A structured plan to hold yourself accountable to and a group to do it with. www.chessdojo.club/training
    Chess is more than a game, it's a lifestyle. Live it with ChessDojo gear: www.chessdojo.club/shop
    0:00 Intro
    2:12 The French/Caro Connection
    3:00 Key Structure of the French
    3:47 Sparring Position 1
    4:37 Ways to Play the French Defense
    6:58 Position 2
    8:06 There's No Such Thing As Bad Bishops...
    9:04 Position 3
    13:19 Position 4
    16:45 Conclusion
    #chess #chessopenings #frenchdefense
    Want to support the channel? Donate here - streamlabs.com/chessdojolive
    Follow ChessDojo here:
    Website: chessdojo.club
    Twitch: / chessdojolive
    Discord: / discord
    Twitter: / chess_dojo
    Patreon: / chessdojo
    Instagram: / chess_dojo
    Podcast: chessdojotalks.podbean.com/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 36

  • @natekidwell
    @natekidwell 11 місяців тому +16

    This is a tremendous series. Just feels like the best way to teach openings.

  • @Evilanious
    @Evilanious 11 місяців тому +13

    My "daauug"? 🤣

  • @Leonjrxx
    @Leonjrxx 27 днів тому +1

    Then you have Tyler 1 who just hit 1900 playing the cow as black and white... no opening theory, constantly in trouble according to the engine before move 10, and doing pretty well just by playing decent moves. Jesse speaks wisdom!

  • @sirenbrian
    @sirenbrian 11 місяців тому +5

    This a great idea, thank you for making these potted summaries of openings. Will you continue and cover a lot of common openings? I vote for one on the Scotch and the QGD, if you're asking :)

  • @bradleyreese5156
    @bradleyreese5156 11 місяців тому +5

    Loving this series focusing on ideas! Awesome

  • @siempresepuede
    @siempresepuede 7 місяців тому +1

    Excellent video. Makes me remember why I chose the French opening...long time ago!!

  • @antonnovo695
    @antonnovo695 11 місяців тому +3

    This is Gold! Thank you

  • @joeleke64
    @joeleke64 11 місяців тому +2

    This is great!!

  • @gossedejong9248
    @gossedejong9248 11 місяців тому +2

    Fantastic!!!

  • @hannahbrown2728
    @hannahbrown2728 9 місяців тому +1

    Adding this to my playlist and commenting for engagements sake. Ill be back when Im 1200

  • @Socrates...
    @Socrates... 11 місяців тому +1

    Thanks Jesse

  • @bluefin.64
    @bluefin.64 11 місяців тому +1

    Looks good. I've always thought the French is an opening every player should learn if they want to really understand chess. I never have, so this makes the Dojo training program even more inviting.

  • @georgepurvis5874
    @georgepurvis5874 8 місяців тому

    Good job! I used to play the French, and now I am returning to it.

  • @davidbourgie2843
    @davidbourgie2843 11 місяців тому +2

    This is another dimension for busy players.

  • @fess04
    @fess04 9 місяців тому +1

    that was awesome Jesse! The French . i am beginning not to have fear :)

  • @firasmoien1923
    @firasmoien1923 9 місяців тому +1

    As a 2000 elo chess player, i admire your style sir.

  • @jackn5
    @jackn5 11 місяців тому +1

    Could you recommend certain principles in exchange variation? i hate it so much because sometikes i dont coordinate correctly in it

    • @davidblue819
      @davidblue819 11 місяців тому +3

      I can recommend certain principles in the exchange variation, though I don't know if Jesse will approve. I recommend two principles.
      First, try to answer each move that White plays with a different move that's just as good. For example if White plays 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. Nf3 you can play 4... Bd6 because that's different from bringing your king's knight out but just as good.
      Second, you try to use the advantage of going second by playing a move that your opponent, going first and committing himself without knowledge of what you would play, has just promised not to punish in the best way. For example if White goes 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. Bd3, you can play 4... c5, bearing in mind that d3 is not the most threatening position for the bishop against an isolated d-pawn, or you can play 4... Nc6, bearing in mind that White promised not to pin your knight at c6 in one move. (He can only play Bb5 in two moves.) Again, you don't want to play a bad move or a weird move, just the normal move that might make the player of White feel that if he had known you wanted to play that he might have picked something different on his previous move.
      These two principles might not work for you but they work for me. If you try them and like them, you might find that French Defense Exchange Variation games don't stay "drawish" for long.

    • @dkpandey1996
      @dkpandey1996 11 місяців тому +1

      The best piece of advice I have received from a UA-cam comment in a long time. Thanks a lot, can't wait to try out your method!

    • @dsrguru
      @dsrguru Місяць тому

      You can always castle long if you're afraid of a boring position.

  • @kiroshakir7935
    @kiroshakir7935 6 місяців тому

    7:33 it isn't a bad move it's just extremely sharp and complicated

  • @user-mathale
    @user-mathale 4 місяці тому

    Amazing voice

  • @GeneralBlorp
    @GeneralBlorp 11 місяців тому +2

    There’s Nothing quite like seeing a grown man in a beret to angry up the chess blood 😅

  • @billagap3213
    @billagap3213 11 місяців тому

    You mentioned that in every opening (either with white or black) one of the minor pices will be bad. How about the queen's gambit with white? I find that all my pieces are happy 😊

    • @wreynolds1995
      @wreynolds1995 9 місяців тому +1

      Usually Black plays ...c7-c6 and your Knight on c3 is just in the way of your Rooks (minority attack); eventually you'll have to move it. Or you might play the exchange variation and go for Ne2 followed by f2-f3 and either a central push e3-e4 or a Kingside push g2-g4 - in this case you're giving up your King Knight's happiness, because it's not doing anything on e2.

    • @billagap3213
      @billagap3213 9 місяців тому

      @@wreynolds1995 in the first example i maneuver my knight from c3. In the second example i maneuver my knight from e2 to g3 where it controls the e4 break.

    • @wreynolds1995
      @wreynolds1995 9 місяців тому +2

      @@billagap3213 The fact that you know what to do doesn't mean your Knights are good. It means you know how to fix them. The fact that they need to be fixed implies that there's something sub-par to begin with!

    • @billagap3213
      @billagap3213 9 місяців тому +1

      @@wreynolds1995 yeah you're right. But i mean in queen's gambit the pieces are generally more mobile than in other openings.

    • @wreynolds1995
      @wreynolds1995 9 місяців тому +1

      @@billagap3213 I must admit I do agree, though I still play 1.e4 myself.

  • @howardberger3676
    @howardberger3676 9 місяців тому

    I'm 1850 and
    too many variations to understand proper piece sequence....

  • @d33763
    @d33763 8 місяців тому +1

    I played the French defense, my pawns abandoned their positions, the knights fled the board and the king was negotiating a surrender.

  • @Darren_S
    @Darren_S 11 місяців тому +1

    I'm a French player. So I guess you don't like playing the Winawer.

    • @daeuri
      @daeuri 11 місяців тому +2

      The French is an opening where there is a major divide between Winawer and Classical players because you rarely see French players play both options. The more strategically minded players do not want to deal with the fireworks that can arise from the Poison Pawn variations, and they may find it off-putting to give up the Bf8 bishop leaving themselves with the problem cleric on c8.

    • @billagap3213
      @billagap3213 11 місяців тому +2

      You can't possibly study all the fireworks that come out of the winawer variation. I have never ever seen identical winawer games. Most games end up with no player castling 😅😅complete madness. Also i don't like giving up the dark square bishop.

  • @bandyta460
    @bandyta460 9 місяців тому

    basically winawer is more challenging option for the opponent
    you must understand ideas which are harder than in the classical variation
    also i dont wanna see all these burn variations, when i look at them they seem to be better for white in my opinion
    in winawer my opponents never play queen g4 and all these critical lines
    I win like 60% of times because I know the ideas and my opponents usually have doubled pawns and I almost every time get a better position out of the opening

  • @benh.7942
    @benh.7942 4 місяці тому

    Bishop B4 players are heretics. That's me, i'm a heretic, lol. That being said I spent a year not playing it before I started doing so.