Object 195 - Secret T95 Russian Main Battle Tank Prototype
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 кві 2022
- The Daily Telegraph and Newsweek called it the Future Soviet Tank, and US Army General Donn A. Starry described it as an unprecedented weapon the likes of which hadn’t been seen since the appearance of nuclear weapons.
They were talking about the T95 tank, an ambitious, top-secret armored vehicle to outmatch every other. The project, codenamed Object 195, was planned to be as revolutionary as the German Panthers and Tigers of World War 2.
Still, the tank’s development eventually started to fall under the weight of its own ambition, with modern technology catching up to it and a series of delays preventing the unveiling of a prototype.
The Soviet Union would need to take harsher measures if they ever wanted the sheer power of their promised colossus to see the light of day…
MUBBIXZLKVGYTAOA
NGJLX7DQZFLFP3YK - Наука та технологія
All the technical specs they wanted in this tank seem to have gone into the T-14. Crew is located in a capsule essentially with a remote operated turret and auto loader. Main difference is the gun
The T-14 is the mature version of this without doubt.
Yes , now in development the t 14 with 152 mm gun in this revolutionary tank
The reason is that T-14 Armata's new 125mm gun is just as powerful as the Object 195's 152mm gun developed in the 90s, the new 125mm 2A82-1M gun has a muzzle energy of 24 megajoules
The SOVIET staff planed for the 2nd Chechen war in 2000? Wow they outlived the Soviet Union by almost a decade.😂
Pretty crazy, not only did they predict that the USSR would collapse, but that Chechnya would become it's own country that they'd have to invade. Soviets must have had a really good time travel program.
@@92HazelMocha actualy they copied the Time Tunnel programm of the amerikanskys.
@@comentedonakeyboard 🤣🤣🤣 fucking Time Tunnel!!
@@hooks4638 it vos of course invented in, well i think there was actualy a russian Time Tunnel in one Episode 🤔
Russian needs to keep “investing” in game changer military technologies like:
1) tanks
2) battleships
3) zeppelin airships
It's all fun and jokes untill you hear *Kirov reporting* 😅
4) new 4th generation fighter aircraft
Russia only plan on land wars with Nato or China. Things get to bad they will just nuke them and then a tank will be a pretty good weapon. See, if the west has nuclear war at #10 on the list of war things the Russians have it at #6
Zeppelins that can fly above 80000 feet and use laser weapons might actually be a thing soon.
And BFG’s.
@4:20 ..."Uses a highly advanced radar gun sight..." -- *shows old 4in. TV from 90's family van*
Wasn't this around the time their army got caught feeding soldiers literal dog food? That is the Soviet style
Then they ate dog food now they eat dogs it's no wonder they are a joke
Russia needs to invest in new and untested technologies like industrial farming, transformation industry, employment, education. If they don't do this they'll constantly need to invade other nations. Other than military and space technology, Russia is a 3rd world country.
@@danielt.8573 facts
Well military is close to 3rd worls
dog food is actually healthier than hamburgers
I built a scale model of a Leopard A2, which is from 1970, and I thought it was big at the time. I have now started building a King Tiger from WW2. The size difference is astonishing. Both are 1/35 scale. Yet the turret on the Leopard is as long as the entire hull of a Tiger 1. The whole Leopard tank, including the barrel, is nearly twice the length of the Tiger.
Hey thats not true, leopard 2a6 with gun foward is almost 10m (9.97m per wiki) the king tiger is 10.286 m with the gun foward.
@@edospijker9971 It's a Tiger 1 Ausf E. I did also say that they are both 1/35 scale models. They are very good. I'm sorry if you didn't like my OP, but it's a fact. As I sit here and look at both of them, the turret of the Leopard is as long as the entire hull of the Tiger. They are both 1/35. I am not mistaken, and I highly doubt anything has been altered for artistic license. These are high quality historically accurate model kits.
@@edospijker9971 oh and I don't have the gun attached to the Tiger yet, hence me not including it in my findings. That's why I only mentioned the Tigers hull.
@@superchickenlips1 Yea but in your OP you said king tiger. Normal tiger indeed is smaller.
@@edospijker9971 Yeah, that was my bad. It's the Tiki Tiger 1.
Why would a tank upgrading begun in 1995 be designated as a "Future SOVIET Tank" when the Soviet Union disappeared in 1991, four years earlier? Wouldn't they mean "Future RUSSIAN Tank"?
Just asking...
One thing that is also important to mention is the fact that much of the developement was done by ukraine's kharkiv plant. The kharkiv plant has build some to most of these prototypes and the T-14 Armata is thought to be the evolution of that project.
Maybe because there are people like Putin who are hell bent on reconstituting the USSR?
Project started in 1988. ...
@@fleekrushyt9410 also consider that the USSR mainly was ruled by Ukrainians and that Vladimir Lenin is Ukrainian
@@startingbark0356 Lenin was not ukrainian
Love your videos man thanks for always giving great videos for us to enjoy you and your team if there's a team thanks
No matter how effective it’s reactive armor is, it won’t be too difficult to develop a triple charge anti tank missile, or even a tandem (missile follows) missile. Just like guided groups of bunker busters, 2nd, 3rd, etc. all hitting the same spot.
Needs the Romulan cloaking device.
the American javelin is 2 stage to beat the armor... why its so devastating
such a system would be too heavy for infantry to carry.
Hasn't the javelin already claimed a few of these tanks in Ukraine recently?
@@pjmillah2172 The Javelin system is like Thor's hammer.
Funny how Russia still using old t72 tank models in 2022 who would’ve thought
Incompetency at the national level. Russia was always full of drunk wife beaters that treat their machines worse.
No money for newer tanks other than maybe a dozen to show off at parades. They're too busy losing the money between the budget office and the program manager's new hot tub
@@user-jt5sm9kp7j it's funny how they managed to not have so much corruption that they could keep basic maintenance never mind upgrades and improved models.
And the armor isn't stuffed with cardboard either!
In the US if you're caught embezzling or taking a bribe you go straight to prison. In Russia, you're just expected to give the guy who caught you half the money.
@@user-jt5sm9kp7j Well when you don't invade peaceful neighbors you don't need fancy new tanks.
@@92HazelMocha well if the nato keeps expanding to russia which russia and nato made a agreement on that russia shouldn’t expand west and nato expand east
Point of order on chronology. You were using the term 'Soviet' when referencing Russian involvement in Chechnya. Note that the first ops in Chechnya were in 1994, a good three years after the collapse of the USSR. So not Soviet but just Russian or Russian Federation from 91 onward.
exactly!!
I think he may have been reading the information from the initial plans, which was 1988….because he did refer to the Russian/Chechen war.
You would be surprised to hear that many Americans still call Russians "the Soviets".It's just a proof of poor education
Point made. But 'Russia' is back to the old Soviet ways. Russia erased the past 30 years by invading Ukraine. Russian should be used in the past tense this time forward. It is, The Soviet Union!
Looks like the KV-2 Is making a come back :D
The Javelin missile says “Hold my beer.”
Z
Armata joined the chat with it's point defense against such weapons
@@axis367 laser hummer 20 miles away sees you
@@axis367 lol joke tank - how many deployed already (I know none as still just frames) please confirm... Javelin take no prisoners lol.
@@axis367 How has that been working in Ukraine?
Congrats for ur channel !! Excellent
I’d rather be the guy with the Javelin
I bet you NEVER served. Other than on your keyboard.
@@just_one_opinion yep I'm sure
@@just_one_opinion Have fun striking ammo depots with hypersonic weapons when we already have radar and gear more than capable to disable everything. Russia would rather pick on the smaller dogs than the alphas out west 🤷♂️ Don’t have to serve to realize Putina is dying all he wants is to be Stalin and with how horribly the troops are treating civilians he’s achieving the massacres to rival Stalin. Putin will spend his final year or months waging a war to cement some spot in history before he is unable to function with the severity of his Parkinson’s advancing so rapidly he might have weeks before he’s unable to be serve as president. If Russia wants a multi front war they can fail as the last fascists to do so did pathetically ending with their leader killing himself.
@@just_one_opinion
Says the guy with all the cat videos 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Hard kill active protection system will intsept that my guy
"The death of one Russian soldier is a tragedy. The death of a hundred thousand is a statistic." Thanks, Stalin. I paraphrased the quote.
The original seems more fitting. Not like the death of civilians means anything either
its accurate in 2022.
Thanks German
It was about people in general not soldiers spesificly why are you deforming the quote to your liking
thanks Hitler
I believe that Russia now has room for more tanks in its fleet now.
Russia has too many old tanks. They dont even have enough troops to man them all. When a t72 gets disabled the crew (if they survive) are given a new one that was in reserve.
If they get hammered inn Ukraine, they might have some T-34's in reserve.
@@paulboger7377 I'm starting to believe it... some of them invading under the old soviet flag already. You thought the pandemic was bad? Boom 2022! the Soviet Union is back! Reincarnated Lenin walks the streets.
I understand there's no longer any shortage of tank parking even during rush hour at Costcoski. May they all rot in hell.
@@paulboger7377 t72s (t72b3) is mainly what was sent to Syria and Ukraine. Newer tanks like t90+ are kept for more importatnt roles, for example if a real war begun. T72s are not as capable in tank to tank combat due to their age but they can still provide decent protection.
T14 tanks are ofc not sent in Ukraine.
Great video...but you gotta provide a song list....I went back and replayed just for the music.
Just a amazing channel
Not as amazing as you would think they get a lot of s*** Wrong
like. idk why this was such a shock. the US was working on the M1 TTB at the same time, even started their project 2 or 3 months earlier
its not the remote turret (what it has in common with the M1 TTB), its its gun size and its FCS (and optics) that make it scary. it could reliably find and hit tank sized targets at 5km at a time when NATO tanks could only do the same at 2-3km, and it could penatrate the best NATO armour at that range at a time when even the best NATO weapons had a hard time dealing with T-72B and T-80U at 1km let alone further.
@@matthiuskoenig3378 i mean... the MBT-70s and KPz-70s were that as well. and theyre 60s tanks, the Obj.195 and M1 TTB are still 1980s projects. of course armor and FCS and stuff will be older in comparison, but this project really put the countries ahead of russia for atleast a decade. and there were 20 made.
Exept thqt there was simular concept in the 80s called the project 477
@@Silver_Prussian The Object 477's first prototype was in 1987
Thanks
This tanks blueprint shows the exact same munition storage carrousel with exposed munition to guarantee a turret pop when hit from above.
As long as the crew is not harmed (because of the 3 person 'capsule' ) that should not bet THE big problem.
I like how he refers to the Russian Federation as the Soviet Union, though not necessarily wrong, it's technically incorrect lol
He says "Soviets" or "Soviet" which just refers to the actual people of russia, they are soviets...he doesnt necessarily mean "Soviet Union" which was a ...Union of many soviet states... make sense??
@@Novagunner If they live in Russia they're Russian, not Soviet.
A word regarding the T-14 Armata.
As long as Russia isn’t able to actually build the tank in numbers to actually equip a battalion with it, it’s nothing more than a prototype!
Russia wanted to build around 2000 Armata, till this day they only got two dozens and they even reduced the order to somewhere between a 100-200 tanks!
Russia is capable enough to maintain and upgrade their old hardware, but everything more modern and complex/complicated like the Armata platform or the SU-57 and it gets painfully clear how bad the Russian economy is!
Anything that is not related to exporting resources out into the world in Russias industry is garbage and nothing works without machines and parts imported from other, more advanced countries!
Indeed
Totally, pretty ambitious to be calling it “the most revolutionary tank this decade” when it has thinner armour and no new technology other MBT’s have. They don’t even have an active protection system.
@@captaron indeed. It's just not really possible to make a well armored MBT weighing much less, being fast, and having a bigger gun. It just doesn't work that way. Thick armor has weight unless you have some major material technology breakthrough. And trying to make major breakthrough technologies ain't cheap.
Basically encountering all of the US problems with new technologies being expensive, except their economy is several times smaller.
Yet this is true for any military development in any country, when was the last time any project came in under budget and on time?
The Russia-loving chuds hate to hear it 😎🇺🇲
Very interesting. More info on the T-14???
They’re going to need more egg cartons for their reactive armor on these big boys. AA Jumbo egg cartons. 18 count even.
Revolutionary design: when the turret pops off due to javelin ammo cookoff, the crew survives!
There is no proof that javelins even work in ukraine, the best you get sre 30 second edited videos or photos of destroyed tanks wich were oviously destroyed by rpgs
They got radar for early missile detection and instant multispectral smoke screen that would make Javelin thermal guidance unable to lock on tank's top even without the need for using active hard kill protection that may not work against high flying Javelin anyway. Soviet/Russian answer to Javelin was available a long time before its introduction because Europeans fielded top attack guided infantry missiles in the mid-80ties, the US opposition just doesn't have money and often competent military leadership to push for upgrades of existing equipment that would make the most difference on the modern battlefield, mostly because they are not concentrating on most likely low-intensity conflict as happening in Ukraine but next Great Patriotic War where Russia will be on defense.
You do realize any tank that get hit in the ammo it’s gonna cook off
Even Abrams
@@mbtenjoyer9487 Cool trolling, like Abrams is some kind of hallmark of survivability on the modern battlefield or something.. Soviets deployed early active defense for tanks destroying incoming missiles and slow artillery rounds in the late 70ties (T-55AD with Drozd, check wiki for basic info) but this early hard-kill defense got limited protected area so it was not a very useful system when deployed in mountainous Afghanistan against mujahedin with RPGs, later Soviet active protection systems got wider protective angle, system used on T-14 and its derivates has apart from the ability to destabilize higher speed kinetic rounds also automatic turret traverse with multispectral smoke discharge to defeat missiles like Javelin attacking from a too high angle for fixed active protection to interfere by obscuring tank from the infrared seeker. In the case of active hard-kill systems like those deployed on Merkava 4B which can point anti-ballistic projectiles in whatever direction, attacking from above isn't enough and the system is capable counter any top attack missile in service, generally tanks developed after Javelin were designed to survive Javelin since they entered service or after planned upgrade..
What are the names of the tracks you used for this video? They sound awesome!
Better make that top armor a priority boys!
doesnt have to, if its hit crew survives.
you know the russians should really stop developing tanks if they cant afford the upkeep and the price to even make them
They can't even afford to pay their crews let alone maintain or build them lol.
The only thing that is revolutionary about this tank is that they started thinking that it would be good to protect the crew
Today's 90% anti-tank weapons are activated above the turret, which resulted in the firing of ammunition and a recognizable sight of the turret separated from the tank body. in the T-14 at least the crew had a better chance of surviving
if you knew what you was talking about you would of known this thing has APS
@@jammygamer8961 Would you sit in that tank that has a "Russian APS protection system" ???I wouldn't even in the Israeli merkava of the last generation
I have yet to see an attack with multiple missiles at once but these are always controlled test conditions we see in commercials
Not 90%. Not even close.
@@CharChar2121 yea this guy has no idea what he's on about
@vorda400 commercial? Lol you mean test. They aren’t selling cornflakes
Interesting video, just to mention though that Nizhniy Tagil is a place, not a person. It's a R&D and manufacturing plant used by Uralvagonzavod.
I do like the sharing of ammo with the 152mm howitzer. That would help logistics.
Tanks are direct fire weapons and howitzers are indirect fire weapons. There is no way they can share ammo. Tank rounds are metal shells with a projectile. Howitzer rounds are bags of cordite behind the projectile.
Actually it depends on the gun and the breach system you use.
@@richardcutts196 I think your saying what I was. They have different breech systems.
@@sssbob Russian tanks use 2 stage ammo same as Howtizers its plausable to make it work but is it worth is i dunno
i get that "oooh ahhhhh" we can fire more types of rounds from the cannon, but between the turret height(that'll look nice n juicy on thermal) and having to stay exposed to guid those guided anti tank munitions, i dont see the surivability in this one lol
its survivability came from increased range. the object 195 had thermals and radar detection systems and an advanced FCS combined with a big 152mm gun that could reliably hit and penetrate a western tank at over 5km, for reference it wasn't untill 2008 that a western tank could reliably do the same to a T-72 at 1km (the penetration part) or do the same to a T-55 at 3km (both pen and hit).
even if its opponents survived long enough to get into their own effective hit range they probably wouldn't survive getting into effective penetration range.
(also as for thermal signature, due to being an unmanned turret the turret would have no thermal signature to speak of, and its hull isn't any taller than other tanks, menaing it would have a similar or smaller thermal signature than the abrams)
They said don’t worry it’ll be the best tank you ever saw
There is a hinge on the turrent so when it blows off it can be flipped back and re crewed
uralvagonzavod Ural is the place, Vagon is carriage or equipment and Zavod is company
COOL TANK MAYBE WE SEE IT IN THE NEAR FUTURE
People here just love russian tanks like this T95 and the Amata.
But you have to wonder where these wonder weapons are?
Why hoard your best weapons?
Its been over 30 days
Should they not be used in Ukraine?
The only have like 2 dozen T-14 armada model tanks lol
@@didur62 exactly you hit your enemies with your best... the russians are not doing that throwing consctipts into the meat grinder than technolgy is much more cost effective.
You can build like six T72s for every T14 and the Russians have already found out in Syria the T14 is susceptible to anti-tank missiles despite its defences. They would probably prefer the West to wonder how effective it is than commit it to combat and remove all doubt, and in the process kill any potential for export sales.
They only made a single 195 prototype and got defunded lol. Russia is too broke to actually build any sizable number of modern tanks.
They need to keep something for the parade on 9/5. If they sent their best to Ukraine, they might end up parading on red square in T-34s.
Didn't the Soviet Union break up in 1991 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Funny none of their leaders seemed to leave power.
I thought that was the case... and then I saw a very old-school looking tank invading Ukraine with a Soviet Union flag on top.. O.o
@@Ocodo Guess we know Russia doesn't teach history in school lol
I like how he made a video on a tank that never actually existed, as stated by THE HEAD OF THE PROJECT, it was just a longer T-80 that was a completely different project that was also canned
And in today's new lexicon, "Drone Shot" takes on an entirely new meaning.
Funny how they wanted to make a new tank cause the T72 was “aging” 😂 wonder what they are using now…
Yeah, very very old junk is the answer, "the realm of flying turrets" and it shows in the losses.
@V .B Boy you are biased lol. American Abrams Tanks use APS on their Tanks and the German Leopards have too much armor than to get killed by an old RPG lol. Like in Syria, when sent without any Infranty Support + being controlled by Soldiers who aren't really capable of controlling them, ofc. they are gonna get destroyed. Tanks aren't undestructable, and without Infranty support an easy target. You can see how the Outdated T-72 and T-64 Tanks are doing in Ukraine rn lmao. (Not saying that the Leopards aren't destroyable via. ATGMS, just way harder to do so instead of Soviet Tanks
@V .B cope harder moskal, doesnt change the fact that russian tanks are old garbage. turret flies 100 feet away.
@V .B how many Abrams or Challenger tanks were lost to enemy fire in Iraq for example?
@V .B where are you getting your info on the 117 tanks lost?
Does the T number have anything to do with the year it was designed?
Strange that it shares a lot of technical inovations we see in the t14 armata. All soviet secrets are stil being developed to this day.
I see the tank like the battleship, dying under their own weight
All fluff no show as per Russia’s normal MO. Probably only that one prototype was ever made.
That's actually exactly correct. They only ever finished a single prototype.
that t14 must be this unique fourth generation tank
This man talks so fast it's like he's about to take off
It still go boom.
best way to defeat soviet tank is to retreat 90 miles and watch the soviet tank run out of gas due to poor supply lines. then soviet tank is stationary and easy target
Yes, keep running coward.
PLEASE🙏 do a Vid about The Thunderwell-- underground nuclear steam piston concept weapon!
There's NO Vid about this crazy and cool af idea on UA-cam, you'd be The First!
You can play this tank in armored warfare. Note it is a tier 10 premium so will be expensive.
A thing about the modernization of T-80s and T-72s. They are actually being modernized (or already have been) with the T-72B3 UBH being made in 2012, and the T-80BVM UBH being ordered in 2019-2020. We have seen that the large majority of the T-72B3's and T-80BVM's have been deployed, have engaged in combat, and have been destroyed during the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine.
The reason they're being wiped out is because of a design flaw. The Russians decided to upgrade the T-72s with autoloaders to drop the crew # from 4 to 3. But there is NO BARRIER between the ammo & the crew. Which means ANY missile, arty shell, or land mine which actually PENETRATES the tank will set off the ammo.
That's why US, Britain & many other countries have blast doors & barriers on their tanks. You might get an M-kill on an Abrams, but you'll hardly EVER get a K-kill, except with very specific weapons. 🤷🤷🤷
The Russians obviously thought they could just steamroll a country & didn't think things thru. Russian tank crews are paying the price for this oversight. Any country that fights back & knows where to aim will hurt them. And now the WHOLE world knows this tank's weakness... Putin must be having a stroke right now about the losses...
@@nunyadambusiness6902 I mean yeah, but that’s just a specific design, the Russians have been using the same carousel design ever since the T-64A in 1966, and with the T-72 Ural in 1979. With both of these tanks seeing combat and being decently effective, minus the weak points, with the ammo being one of them. At the end of the day, especially with the modernized variants of each tank, it comes down to crew skill, and also the environment there fighting in, the modernized tanks I stated in my other comment both have really nice Relikt ERA side skirts that covers 3 quarters the side of the tank where the carousel is, the Relikt can stop HEAT warheads from penning upwards of about 660mm of armor, but are very lacking when it comes to kinetic or general AP projectiles. There’s been several images of a T-72B3 UBH going around that shows it intact and abandoned by the crew, the weird thing is is that the ERA bags are actually missing the soft insert brick ERA, with the bags being intact and not blown out like it was shot at. Some people have been speculating that the Russian ground forces are not being supplied with basic equipment that would give there heavily modernized tanks a slight boost in survivability, which would show that the Russian government is being incredibly ignorant to there military, as they usually are.
@@lance_the_avocado9492 660 mm? Ffs 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️... from everything I've seen, the relikt is pretty effective with some things...
@@nunyadambusiness6902 Well ERA in general is very effective against HEAT, because it’s ERA, those are just estimated numbers, considering Relikt is meant to improve over Kontakt-5. The T-72B3 UBH only uses Relikt sideskirts and then the Sides of the turret uses Relikt, with the cheeks and the front using Kontakt-5. The T-80BVM uses Relikt all around, while using the less useful T-80B composite armor, I personally think if they used the T-80U chassis and replaced the Kontakt-5 with Relikt instead, the composite T-80U armor would be much nicer that the quartz core the T-80B uses.
@@lance_the_avocado9492 wow... well put... but if their ERA is that good, we might have a problem... 🤯🤦♂️😳...
Why is there an encryption key in this videos description?
Man i would love to see the T95.
It evolved into the T-14 armata / it is the T-14 Arnata prototyope.
Bet it's got some kind of 'factory-installed cage' on the top. Not because it protects anything, but to trap the crew inside while the tank's burning so they won't get out alive and tell everybody "the cage doesn't work!"
What is the Narrator's accent I have always felt he has some form of one and I don't think I have heard chassis pronounced like that before? Not to mention the speed in which he speaks he has a particular cadence that is unique but that may just be having to deliver a lot of information quickly at times.
This may be not even close but I’ve always thought he sounded like several native Americans I’ve known (in the American southwest)
Armata looks good. But can it fight? I'm guessing an M1A2 SEP v4 with its suite of new sensors and weps upgrades, including AMP rounds would kill it as soon as it sensed it. Which would be long before ARMATA's drunken crew knew what hit em'.....
the AMP round is not an anti-tank muntion, why mention it?
anyway the T-14 has more advanced sensors than the M1A2 SEP v4. both sides might be under or over selling their sensors, but according to available information the T-14 has the better sensors.
also assuming the Armata would have a drunken crew is both racist and a bad idea militarily (everytime people underestimate their enemies based on steriotypes they get a rude awakening, just look at ukraine, russia sent in mostly their older weapons and its unexperianced units, and they took heavy casualties and were forced to withdraw, only in the south with the professionals are they doing well, and even there they are taking casualties. because they underestimated the ukrainians as drunkards useing obsolete tech like you are doing to the russians now)
Like a great many other Soviet/Russian designs, it looks great on paper but would never live up to its hype.
A swimming pool in a submarine never looked like a good idea on paper though....
As they say "niet analogov v mire" or "there is nothing comparable in the world with it" which I agree with. You can't compare military equipment with overhyped trash.
what soviet designs never lived up to its hype? the T-72 smashed the contemporary M60 and chieftain tanks whenever and wherever they faught and according to both german and US tests in the 2000s the T-72B was almost invulnerable frontally to all contemporary (80s and 90s) NATO weapons. the T-72 certainly lived up to the hype.
@@matthiuskoenig3378 Exactly, people don't judge these projects in a time when they were put into service and or against rivals from that time, but they judge their performance in conflicts from almost 50 years later where their equally old western equipment would most likely fair the same as shown by Turkey's use of leo 2a4s.
Russia always has big ambitions but small returns. They did the same thing after WWII with a monster tank they couldn't afford to make but it would have rivalled Western tanks for decades. Now we see a repeat of this behavior in the UKE...
I think the person has been killed by russian spies before he could type ukraine...
Jk
Because the Ukriane was giving modern technology which the 80,90 and 72 weren't built for. They were built for the Middle East like western tanks.
Just wait till the turret becomes the object
so it was basically the prototype for the T-14 Armata we see today.
Why does it seem like the t-95 became the t-14 due to their similarities of being a breakthrough tank, a isolated crew capsule, a 152mm gun (Russia wants to put it on the t-14), brand new design
Will it have a cope cage on top?
5:45. That big flat top that tank bullets should skip right off turned into a big target for javelins… your strength becomes your weakness
And what if all the Javelins get blown up by a hypersonic cruise missle strike on the border? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Such better of t 84 oplot. This was a radical change of many parts of the tank .
Laughs in A-10 Warthog.
Chassis is said as Cha-See not Cha-sus
Wonder if it will come with reverse.
It's not ural-gavon-zavod but ural-vagon-zavod
tbh the t 95 black eagle(object 640) look formidable God I wish they had been cancelled and I would love to see one in action
Black eagle is Object 640, that is very different tank
the way he said "vagon zavod"(wagon factory) sounded like shit factory🤣🤣🤣which is figuratively speaking true
Yeah and all the "experts" said that the advanced and powerful Russian army would roll over the inferior Ukrainian army.
I think they would of rolled over them in a blitzkrieg style but strangely they decided to do what they did and it was shocking
To be fair, litteraly no one expected Russia's military to be so incredibly incompetent. Like I'm starting to wonder if even the Kremlin knew how absolutely garbage their armed forces are.
@@92HazelMocha They aren't garbage. 99% of stuff you see online about Russian army is pure propaganda. They are performing quite good, considering they are massively outnumbered and lots of it's armed forces are equipped with 80s tech that is expendable, while they keep the good stuff away in fear of losing it.
The stuff that isn't rusted garbage with missing parts is with our good soldiers that totally exist, just out of frame
@@slavicemperor8279 That makes no sense. The whole point of a fast attack is to use your best to establish victory as fast as possible. There is no reason to hold 'the best' in reserve. Also they are horribly floundering. Tried an attack on the capital and blatantly failed.
Does it have a deterrent for farmers and their tractors?
You can keep your turret popping auto loader junk, I’ll keep my human crew with the ammo bulkhead and blowout panels.
sound like a SPA with extra steps.
I think we all know very well now that anything that Russia says is to be taken with liberal amounts of salt.
New War Thunder tank on the road hopefully
The next premium tank in world of tanks.
8:12 Isn't this the parade where it broke down and had to be towed ?
I read about that apparently the driver had the parking break on could be Russia saying that tho . Who knows what’s true with them.
Don't think it had to be towed after all but it did break down.
So it's an MBT with an artillery gun? Intriguing..
its ok NLAW and Javelins will kill it.
Can somebody tell this guy that this tank exist and it is named T - 14 ?????
All of these specs sound impressive until a handheld javelin shows up and detonates all of the ammunition in the auto loader. 🇺🇸
Shit, that's new tech, an good old tow from a thirty year old Bradley will blow the turret off, I've personally busted a few of the Soviet Block armored assets. Not an Armada platform but I'm sure they'll do just fine on it...
@@kevinfreeman3098 this is assuming you were in the American military, but I thank you for your service. Glad to see you here.
Isnt that the case with bassically any tank lol
I'd hate to burst your bubble but the T14 has soft kill and hard kill active protection systems. That shiny 300,000 missile would be vaporized
@@Weakest_Bulgarian Not every piece of hardware works 100% as well as advertised, not even the "advanced" western ones
Its like describing a new type of Metal Gear 😂
it all look pretty silly now dont you think
Cool spec sheet. Is it the kind of tank that doesn't run out of fuel before getting captured ?
Only on CNN....the most TRUSTED name in news you gullible soddo. now put your mask on, it's election err flu season again. Enjoy the wealth transfer while loosing all your "rights".
Why is the speaker 'speeding'... I can't keep up and its gets stressfull after 1-2 min... (never good in a documentation) maybe a bit of edeting and you could tell the storry in normal tempo, and my settings are in normal... if i lower speed of play... well thats also souding odd.. ... sorry I'm out
Maybe the Russians could focus on chewing gum and walking at the same time, that seems to be their biggest challenge.
Chassis, is pronounced Chassy, rhymes with classy ;)
Not gonna modernize their T-72’s and T-80’s, didn’t even mention their T-55’s or T-64’s
You are referring to the post Chechen war period using "Soviet". That's incorrect, it should be "Russia"
The picture is probably from a self propelled gun.
It doesn’t really matter how capable, on paper, a piece of equipment is. If your personnel are poorly trained and your tactics are flawed then.
This is perfectly demonstrated by Russia’s lack of combat effectiveness during the current conflict in Ukraine.
How are you basing that on, CNN and MSM? Did they not take Donbas region? Did they not preform a diversionary attack on Uker capitol while enveloping and de-nazifiying the east?
@@just_one_opinion rubbish, no armed forces in their right minds, would attack towards a more valuable and therefore heavily defended objective i.e a capital city/seat of government and by doing so sacrifice countless lives and equipment to pull defenders away from a lesser objective.
this tanks i think was the inspiration for t14 armata
It is lol
Some of this tank development was re developed for T-14
0:06 turret toss ammo
Honestly i think it would have just caused another JS3 style panic amoung NATO.
Just placed one on pre-order so excited hahahaha left hand turners and red light runners watch put nevermind anyone stupid enough to try road rage on me.
Large tank forces filling the plains are a foolish waste of time and money.