The amount that a system self organizes R = (Ea-Ed)/ Δt Ea = Energy absorbed Ed = Energy dissipated Postulate 1. The amount of self re-organisation of a physical storage system can be measured as a change in energy in that system over a change in time. R = (Ea-Ed)/Δt Ea = Energy absorbed Ed = Energy dissipated t = time Postulate 2. The change in energy of a storage system, is the product of a re-organisation of the storage and a change in time. ΔE = R.Δt Postulate 3. Change in time is the change in energy over the reorganization of a storage system. Δt = ΔE / R Using R/m, (J/s)/m we can calculate the reorganization of a system over the storage medium (measured in mass).
Kindly explain why a particular spin is favored by the decrease in temperature. The narrator failed to establish the link between the cooling and the "preference" for the spin adopted. Why is that particular spin favored over other spins which can also cause a positive feedback among its neighboring spins.
Very important to remember! Thermodynamic entropy is not needed to identify the direction of natural processes G.P. Gladyshev N. N. Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics of RAS endeav.net/news/112-termodinamicheskaya-entropiya-ne-nuzhna-dlya-vyyavleniya-napravleniya-prirodnykh-protsessov.html Abstract New results confirm the assertion that thermodynamic entropy, as a separate function, is not needed to identify spontaneous processes that occur according to the second law of thermodynamics in natural systems. Key words: thermodynamics, entropy, second principle, hierarchies, stability, evolution. More than 20 years have passed since the creation of the journal Entropy. In my opinion, the appearance of the journal is quite justified, if only because many problems of science are now identified that are associated with modern concepts of diverse ideas about entropy. In addition, misunderstandings related to the fact that science has become a mass phenomenon and many non-professional researchers, amateurs, and visionaries appear among scientists have been identified. This is especially manifested in thermodynamics - area of knowledge that require profound professionalism. "Entropy" journal was founded by Dr. Shu-Kun Lin, who decided to publish all the works concerning all the various ideas about entropy, often related only to the term itself, but not its physical meaning. So, it was supposed to publish the ideas of I. R. Prigogine on the production of entropy in systems far from equilibrium, when “entropy” is a kinetic function, since it does not have a full differential. Dr. After 20 years of hard work, Shu-Kun concluded that Prigogine’s theory of said entropy “does not conform with the second law of thermodynamics”. At that time, I often spoke with the Editor-in-Chief of the new journal and shared his point of view in publishing in the journal research using various ideas about entropy. Although I relied in my publications only on the concepts of classical thermodynamic entropy in accordance with the works of Rudolf Clausius, J. W. Gibbs K. Denbigh, F. Daniels, R. Alberty and other classics. The purpose of this brief note is to once again draw the attention of researchers to the inappropriateness of using the concept of thermodynamic entropy to identify the direction of spontaneous processes in natural systems that proceed in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics and can be a subject of experimental researches. Currently, new publications have appeared that draw attention to the fact that a change in the thermodynamic entropy does not determine the direction of spontaneous processes in real natural biological systems, which are close to equilibrium quasi-equilibrium systems. All equilibrium and close to equilibrium systems can be characterized by state functions, including entropy. At the same time, these systems are not simple isolated systems. The ideas about the production of entropy by L. Boltzmann, E. Schrödinger, I. Prigogine allow us only to assert an increase in the entropy of the Universe and cannot be experimentally verified. In these cases, entropy cannot determine the direction of spontaneous processes in real systems. The increase in the entropy of L. Boltzmann is applicable to identify the direction of spontaneous processes only to simple isolated systems, the internal energy of which is constant and in which no work is performed, other than the work of expansion. The direction of spontaneous natural processes close to equilibrium is determined by the Gibbs free energy, which tends to a minimum. Hierarchical thermodynamics, created on the basis of the extended Gibbs theory, is the physical foundation of extended Darwinism, applicable to the evolution of all hierarchies of the universe. The evolutionary thermodynamic theory of “hierarchically multidirectional forces” is based on the principle of substance stability and does not need to be understood about entropy as a function that reveals the direction of spontaneous processes in nature. Conclusion The concept of the entropy of natural systems far from equilibrium, as well as the concept of the production of entropy of natural systems close to equilibrium, as a separate parameter striving for an extreme value, should not be used to identify the direction of spontaneous processes in the study of natural phenomena. References 1. Shu-Kun Lin. Molecular Diversity Preservation International Entropy 1999, 1(1), 1. 2. Gladyshev G.P. On General Physical Principles of Biological Evolution, International Journal of Research Studies in Biosciences. 2017, Volume 5, Issue 3, Page No: 5-10. www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijrsb/v5-i3/2.pdf 3. Georgi Gladyshev, Hierarchical Thermodynamics: Foundation of Extended Darwinism. "Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), 2017 4. Hierarchical thermodynamics en.everybodywiki.com/Hierarchical_thermodynamics 5. Gladyshev G.P. The time has come to revive and develop the classics: hierarchical thermodynamics and life, Norwegian Journal of development of the International Science, №26/2019, Vol. 2, pp. 15-20. ISSN 3453-9875 6. Spyros G Tzafestas. Energy, Information, Feedback, Adaptation, and Self-organization: The Fundamental Elements of Life and Society. Springer International Publishing, Jan 29, 2019 -Technology & Engineering
Your use of synergy is used in a benign or positive sense but certainly systems can self organize or something trigger them to emerge into very harmful dangerous dynamics that may be impossible to stop if not recognized and counteractions taken early .
What are the differences between swarm intelligence and self organization? I read this research journal suggesting that brood sorting in ants is not a result of swarm intelligence but self organization. I’m trying to figure out what they mean by that but it just looks like self organization is a subset of swarm intelligence
The amount that a system self organizes R = (Ea-Ed)/ Δt
Ea = Energy absorbed
Ed = Energy dissipated
Postulate 1.
The amount of self re-organisation of a physical storage system can be measured as a change in energy in that system over a change in time.
R = (Ea-Ed)/Δt
Ea = Energy absorbed
Ed = Energy dissipated
t = time
Postulate 2.
The change in energy of a storage system, is the product of a re-organisation of the storage and a change in time.
ΔE = R.Δt
Postulate 3.
Change in time is the change in energy over the reorganization of a storage system.
Δt = ΔE / R
Using R/m, (J/s)/m we can calculate the reorganization of a system over the storage medium (measured in mass).
this video is amazing
Good short video introducing the basic ideas and definitions.
Good example with the magnetic spin. I also thought about the phase transitions, as when water turns into ice.
That is not self-organization.
crystal growth, or any form of phase transition from a liquid to a crystaline solid is a traditional example of self-organization in physics.
Kindly explain why a particular spin is favored by the decrease in temperature. The narrator failed to establish the link between the cooling and the "preference" for the spin adopted. Why is that particular spin favored over other spins which can also cause a positive feedback among its neighboring spins.
Mad Respect my friend. God bless you
Ironically, the understanding of self-organization made gods and their blesses obsolete concepts.
The video content is so excellent, congratulations
Very important to remember!
Thermodynamic entropy is not needed to identify the direction of natural processes
G.P. Gladyshev
N. N. Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics of RAS
endeav.net/news/112-termodinamicheskaya-entropiya-ne-nuzhna-dlya-vyyavleniya-napravleniya-prirodnykh-protsessov.html
Abstract
New results confirm the assertion that thermodynamic entropy, as a separate function, is not needed to identify spontaneous processes that occur according to the second law of thermodynamics in natural systems.
Key words: thermodynamics, entropy, second principle, hierarchies, stability, evolution.
More than 20 years have passed since the creation of the journal Entropy. In my opinion, the appearance of the journal is quite justified, if only because many problems of science are now identified that are associated with modern concepts of diverse ideas about entropy. In addition, misunderstandings related to the fact that science has become a mass phenomenon and many non-professional researchers, amateurs, and visionaries appear among scientists have been identified. This is especially manifested in thermodynamics - area of knowledge that require profound professionalism.
"Entropy" journal was founded by Dr. Shu-Kun Lin, who decided to publish all the works concerning all the various ideas about entropy, often related only to the term itself, but not its physical meaning. So, it was supposed to publish the ideas of I. R. Prigogine on the production of entropy in systems far from equilibrium, when “entropy” is a kinetic function, since it does not have a full differential. Dr. After 20 years of hard work, Shu-Kun concluded that Prigogine’s theory of said entropy “does not conform with the second law of thermodynamics”.
At that time, I often spoke with the Editor-in-Chief of the new journal and shared his point of view in publishing in the journal research using various ideas about entropy. Although I relied in my publications only on the concepts of classical thermodynamic entropy in accordance with the works of Rudolf Clausius, J. W. Gibbs K. Denbigh, F. Daniels, R. Alberty and other classics.
The purpose of this brief note is to once again draw the attention of researchers to the inappropriateness of using the concept of thermodynamic entropy to identify the direction of spontaneous processes in natural systems that proceed in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics and can be a subject of experimental researches.
Currently, new publications have appeared that draw attention to the fact that a change in the thermodynamic entropy does not determine the direction of spontaneous processes in real natural biological systems, which are close to equilibrium quasi-equilibrium systems.
All equilibrium and close to equilibrium systems can be characterized by state functions, including entropy. At the same time, these systems are not simple isolated systems. The ideas about the production of entropy by L. Boltzmann, E. Schrödinger, I. Prigogine allow us only to assert an increase in the entropy of the Universe and cannot be experimentally verified. In these cases, entropy cannot determine the direction of spontaneous processes in real systems. The increase in the entropy of L. Boltzmann is applicable to identify the direction of spontaneous processes only to simple isolated systems, the internal energy of which is constant and in which no work is performed, other than the work of expansion.
The direction of spontaneous natural processes close to equilibrium is determined by the Gibbs free energy, which tends to a minimum. Hierarchical thermodynamics, created on the basis of the extended Gibbs theory, is the physical foundation of extended Darwinism, applicable to the evolution of all hierarchies of the universe. The evolutionary thermodynamic theory of “hierarchically multidirectional forces” is based on the principle of substance stability and does not need to be understood about entropy as a function that reveals the direction of spontaneous processes in nature.
Conclusion
The concept of the entropy of natural systems far from equilibrium, as well as the concept of the production of entropy of natural systems close to equilibrium, as a separate parameter striving for an extreme value, should not be used to identify the direction of spontaneous processes in the study of natural phenomena.
References
1. Shu-Kun Lin. Molecular Diversity Preservation International Entropy 1999, 1(1), 1.
2. Gladyshev G.P. On General Physical Principles of Biological Evolution, International Journal of Research Studies in Biosciences. 2017, Volume 5, Issue 3, Page No: 5-10.
www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijrsb/v5-i3/2.pdf
3. Georgi Gladyshev, Hierarchical Thermodynamics: Foundation of Extended Darwinism. "Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), 2017
4. Hierarchical thermodynamics
en.everybodywiki.com/Hierarchical_thermodynamics
5. Gladyshev G.P. The time has come to revive and develop the classics: hierarchical thermodynamics and life, Norwegian Journal of development of the International Science, №26/2019, Vol. 2, pp. 15-20. ISSN 3453-9875
6. Spyros G Tzafestas. Energy, Information, Feedback, Adaptation, and Self-organization: The Fundamental Elements of Life and Society. Springer International Publishing, Jan 29, 2019 -Technology & Engineering
Your use of synergy is used in a benign or positive sense but certainly systems can self organize or something trigger them to emerge into very harmful dangerous dynamics that may be impossible to stop if not recognized and counteractions taken early .
very good explanation, thank you
What are the differences between swarm intelligence and self organization? I read this research journal suggesting that brood sorting in ants is not a result of swarm intelligence but self organization. I’m trying to figure out what they mean by that but it just looks like self organization is a subset of swarm intelligence
They are the same, ‘swarm intelligence’ is an abstracted explanation of self organisation
Excellent Video!
fantastic video
Preach...
yes another aidiot atheist idea to deny the grand designer