I had audi 2.7tdi with cvt(multitronic) and it drives perfectly, mostly under 1500 rpm and it is using torque power, very interesting in combination with diesel. Also i tested toyota, smaller benzin engine with cvt, that was terrible, always on high rpm.
I have 2 2003 Saturn ions with VTi (CVT) and at 45 MPH the engine is just barely over 1,300 RPM. It’s the same power train that the Opel Vectra C has when equipped with the CVTronic transmission
Not sure what happened there, but you can drive that combo at 7 Liters without any trouble, including city driving. On rural roads you can get well under 6 liters. For a car that big and heavy and with AWD, that's quite good actually. Was you unit new? Ours was cleaning the particle filter almost every 100 kilometers when it was new. That settled after about 1000Km...
@@Pit-Stop Under six on average for a 150ps 4 wheeler automatic with over 1800Kg? Those are not realistic expectations. Between six and seven with moderate driving, yes. And that is totally possible.
Sorry man, I don't want to piss on your parade, I watched a lot of your videos and found them awsome. But on this one you are just way off. You are calling something a major issue that you could not have evaluated in a serious way. Ever. You are saying yourself, you drove the car 200Km. How on earth will you make an educated judgement over fuel consumption after 200Km? With a Diesel with SRC even. One regeneration process and your fuel consumption average will jump up over a liter per 100Km. Even worse, you are relying on the trip computer readings. How do you know those are accurate? Because they are not. On the 1.7 dci X-Trail they are actually significantly too high. Also, I did my best to reproduce that CVT effect you are talking about and it was just impossible. The only way to get it to rev at 2000 rpms constantly was to drive 130Kph or faster - or uphill of course. It seems to work perfectly. Maybe you got a faulty unit, I don't know. In any case, I just wished you had asked Nissan to give you the car a while longer or another one to investigate that issue before doing a video like this. Would have been the better choice.
the engine is not powerful enough, this is the euro norm, which are castrating the diesels...i have an outlander 2016 and it is making 7.8 to 8.0 per 100 km and i measure it at the gas station, by the fuel i put in...next generations will be even worse, the cars are getting more expensive and the users are screwed anytime around...
![Моторы-дизеля 1.6 dCi [R9M] и 1.7 [R9N] от Рено. ОБЗОР](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JiAwUHRAscY/mqdefault.jpg)
I had audi 2.7tdi with cvt(multitronic) and it drives perfectly, mostly under 1500 rpm and it is using torque power, very interesting in combination with diesel. Also i tested toyota, smaller benzin engine with cvt, that was terrible, always on high rpm.
I have 2 2003 Saturn ions with VTi (CVT) and at 45 MPH the engine is just barely over 1,300 RPM. It’s the same power train that the Opel Vectra C has when equipped with the CVTronic transmission
Not sure what happened there, but you can drive that combo at 7 Liters without any trouble, including city driving. On rural roads you can get well under 6 liters. For a car that big and heavy and with AWD, that's quite good actually. Was you unit new? Ours was cleaning the particle filter almost every 100 kilometers when it was new. That settled after about 1000Km...
Under 6 would be fairly decent, yes. Most of the cars we test on the channel have over 1000km, though.
@@Pit-Stop Under six on average for a 150ps 4 wheeler automatic with over 1800Kg? Those are not realistic expectations. Between six and seven with moderate driving, yes. And that is totally possible.
Sorry man, I don't want to piss on your parade, I watched a lot of your videos and found them awsome. But on this one you are just way off. You are calling something a major issue that you could not have evaluated in a serious way. Ever. You are saying yourself, you drove the car 200Km. How on earth will you make an educated judgement over fuel consumption after 200Km? With a Diesel with SRC even. One regeneration process and your fuel consumption average will jump up over a liter per 100Km. Even worse, you are relying on the trip computer readings. How do you know those are accurate? Because they are not. On the 1.7 dci X-Trail they are actually significantly too high. Also, I did my best to reproduce that CVT effect you are talking about and it was just impossible. The only way to get it to rev at 2000 rpms constantly was to drive 130Kph or faster - or uphill of course. It seems to work perfectly. Maybe you got a faulty unit, I don't know. In any case, I just wished you had asked Nissan to give you the car a while longer or another one to investigate that issue before doing a video like this. Would have been the better choice.
Very good video
So, what's the fuel consumption if you drive on a highway with 120km/h
They don't offer the 2.0 Diesel anymore in Europe? So only Australia offers 2.0 Diesel CVT?
No, it didn't match the emission standards, it was super thirsty and loud as fuck. Unsellable.
@@NameNaameNameeNaamee 2.0 diesel was discontinued in favor of 1.7 dci with adblue.
@@toxiclovept That's what I said :)
the engine is not powerful enough, this is the euro norm, which are castrating the diesels...i have an outlander 2016 and it is making 7.8 to 8.0 per 100 km and i measure it at the gas station, by the fuel i put in...next generations will be even worse, the cars are getting more expensive and the users are screwed anytime around...