The Unfair Psychology Behind Police Interrogations
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 гру 2020
- Get your first audiobook and full access to the Plus Catalog for free when you try Audible for 30 days. Visit www.audible.com/charisma or text to “charisma” 500 500!
Subscribe to Charisma On Command’s UA-cam Account:
bit.ly/COC-Subscribe
Why does anyone confess to the police? While a plea bargain in court might lower your punishment, confessing to police can only hurt you. Yet people do it all the time.
⏰TIMESTAMPS⏰
0:15 - #1: They pretend that they're your ally.
1:00 - #2: The positive confrontation.
3:44 - #3: Interrogators shut down denials immediately.
4:36 - #4: They give you a way out with minimization.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#PoliceInterrogations #CharismaOnCommand
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out JCS - Criminal Psychology:
/ @jcs
Join our 5000+ members over at Charisma University !
bit.ly/2IKTspl
Connect with us further:
Website: www.charismaoncommand.com
Facebook: / charismaoncommand
Instagram: @CharismaOnCommand
Or if you want to see our personal stuff:
Instagram: @CharlieHoupert
Instagram: @IamBenAltman - Навчання та стиль
1. Remain silent.
2. Request a lawyer.
3. If in doubt, see 1.
I like the 3rd point
Actually, that's not right. It should be:
1. Request a lawyer
2. Do not answer any questions
3. If in doubt, see 1
How am I supposed to request a lawyer while remaining silent?
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 pass them a card with your lawyers details on
@@RossTheNinja You carry a card with your lawyer's details on it? When you travel out of state, where your lawyer probably can't practice law, the first thing you do is get an attorney's card with his information in case you need it? I guess you have already done that, so you carry around a big stack of lawyer's business cards, so this information clearly is not for you.
@@freeottis What could an attorney possibly say that would get you in trouble?
What if a meteor crashed through the roof and hit you in the head?
Reminder: do NOT talk to police. Ask for a lawyer, and shut up.
Thank you, sir.
most of the time there isn't a choice. Either talk or get shot
why ask just say nothing
If a person with a gun wants to murder you, we're talking about a totally different situation than a recorded conversation in a police station.
@IAm Moana *sigh*
When I was 12 I was home alone and someone tried to break into my house. It was a fairly passive attempt (whoever it was ran off after seeing me inside), but I was scared enough to call the police.
They showed up and went looking around my neighborhood. The neighbors two doors down were not completely clean so the father took off into the back woods leaving his son behind in the house. The officers went into that house (notably without a warrant or good cause) and found the boy hiding in a closet. They called me in to identify him.
That teenage boy was crying and terrified. The police told me that he had confessed to trying to break in to my home. That kid was obviously scared enough to confess to the Lincoln and JFK assassinations. He didn't match the description I had given them, and I told them that. They acted like I was suddenly lying to them. Fortunately, I held my ground and told them firmly this kid was innocent.
Glad I wasn't used to wrongfully imprison a teenager.
Okay this is pretty good
Wow thats actually crazy Im proud of you for standing your ground and telling them the truth.
Wow, is police like that all over the world? I had a somewhat similar experience when I was called to the police station to identify my robber. Considering that I saw the guy's face several inches from mine and he was young and very blond, they were showing me a much older guy with dark hair. And gosh they tried to make me say that it was him.
It was scary. It's like I was guilty of something when in reality they just didn't want to do their job.
Lol @ Lincoln and JFK confessions
Shame on you for letting JFK's killer walk.
I never understood why a suspect never decides to just end the interrogation by getting up and leaving the building, the agents literally tell them they’re free to leave anytime.
Because that's not completely true. They make you feel like you cant go anywhere
They're aftaid that leaving makes them look guilty.
Maybe that is just another lie they legally can tell
My best guess is to make you feel comfortable ny giving you an easy-out, and the masochistic epistemology inside you says "It can't be that easy".
You can leave but they’ll immediately go to the judge for a warrant for arrest.
My dad was a cop for 25 years, and he told me if I’m ever in trouble with the police, don’t talk to them.
Same with my sister who is a police officer! Police officers of integrity usually advise their loved ones not to deal with police because many are scummy as hell.
Wow. That’s pretty revealing isn’t it. Your dad seems to know he worked with some bad dudes. It takes a bad dude to put a guy in prison who’s not guilty.
@JTC no, you shouldn't go to the officers home to confront or discuss because then it is a threat to the family
@JTC there is no similarity to the bully. And usually bullying victims go to the school, etc, not to the bully 's parents! And your anecdotal experience with law enforcement pales in comparison to those of us who lived it for our career. It's like me having a bad experience with a black mugger, and condeming all black people as being criminal and alike. Duh. Also, a criminal accomplishes nothing good coming to my home to confront my family. My wife doesn't control me. Dept regulations, the law, and the courts do. Bullying cops get found out and fired or harassed by their dept. Criminal cops get prosecuted. That's not to say that innocent cops don't get tarred with a false Reputation by a zealous news media. I've seen that numerous times. It's the damned of you do, damned if you don't, scenario. Judging any human activity by the exception rather than the rule cheats them and you.
My uncle was a criminal defense attorney and a law school professor. When I was a freshman and decided to go to the same college that he taught at he basically told me the same thing but he added call him first.
Remember: the safe word is "lawyer"
Better still, bring your lawyer along.....
Its interesting, because lawyer is a double edged sword. If you ask for a lawyer people may think you're hiding something💁♂️ still asking for a lawyer is the best thing for you if you're guilty or innocent.
Cop: So are you single or...
Me: * outside of Starbucks * Lawyer
@@KingSlayer_. It doesn't matter what people think, it only matters what they can prove.
@@letterl1840 😜👌
Four words to say to a cop: *"I want my lawyer."*
Exactly then your attorney does the talking
nah just one
"lawyer"
Or better yet "I demand a lawyer and invoke my fifth amendment right"
Just remember: if you’re in the interrogation room, they don’t have enough evidence. If they can prove you committed a crime, you would be in the holding cell waiting to see the judge
That’s not true at all. I’ve been instructed from my supervisors to get a video statement from any and every felony arrest where the defendant does not lawyer up. It can help a strong and a weak case. Just because you’re being interrogated does not necessarily mean it’s a weak case. Trust me. This is how it’s done in NYC.
Additionally, here is why what you said is untrue. I’ve had cases where there was multiple witnesses who knew the guy (a confirmatory ID, which is much much stronger than a stranger ID, where there’s always the possibility of a mis-ID), caught on surveillance camera, caught on NYPD body camera, with the guy arrested holding the gun in his hand.. as close to a slam dunk as possible.. and I was still instructed to get a video statement from him every single time (so long as he didn’t lawyer up).
This is because even if he denies everything, their statement can still put themselves at the scene, or eliminate the possibility of an alibi defense. Also, no offense, but criminals aren’t the most intelligent people. They think they can talk their way out of things. And they wind up sinking their own ship.
And additionally, most importantly, it pidgeon holes them into a version of the events that they cannot deviate from at trial. So there are many benefits to getting a statement on camera, for a strong or weak case. Once you have his version recorded, he cannot change it at a later time at trial. Because any changed version will make their testimony inconsistent which opens them up to an “impeachment by inconsistent statement”.
Also, getting a video statement from them 9 times out of 10 allows you to discover what defense they will be using at trial. And once it’s put on camera he does not have time to change or alter his version of the events.
So there are many many many reasons to get a video statement from a perp. Both in strong and weak evidentiary cases.
Not true cause they can have video evidence of you doing the crime and interview you to understand why you did it
@@aurartx8354 in that sense they don’t really care why you did it. They would be looking to obtain a confession from you. A confession plus video is a slam dunk trial. Not for nothing, we don’t really care “why” you did it. That’s subjective and hardly relevant.
Just like how an undercover cop has to tell you he’s a cop
@@stuffenjoyer2223 wait this is a joke right lol
"youre obviously not under arrest today. Anytime you feel like you want to leave here, feel free to do so.."
"Ok Bye"
Yeah, they won't like that.
@@locutusdborg126 good
Seriously, I would have left right then.
@@DevinFlake and that would have also been the right thing to do, honestly
I mean, if you could leave at any time you wanted, how did you even get there in the first place? Do not go to the police station unless they arrest you.
Wrongful incarceration is honestly my worst fear.
Just plead the 5th. And realize this, if police had concrete evidence against you, you'd most likely already be in handcuffs. The fact that they're so hell bent on a person confessing means they don't have anything and the only way you get trapped is if you confess. Just lawyer up
No kidding! Remember that YOU HAVE RIGHTS! Stay silent 😶
@@MandeepSingh-ki6ve what if the evidence is planted by the police or someone else? Saying Lawyer 50 times won’t help you then.
@@Dasanie then you'd be in handcuffs already. The fact that they're interrogating you for hours day in and day out most likely means they're only relying on your confession to put you in jail.
@@MandeepSingh-ki6ve or if they get a confession, their chances of getting you locked up his higher then fighting you in court and potentially having the falsified evidence discovered
Remember my first encounter with these dirty tricks was getting into big trouble at school and the teachers would say ‘all your friends have already told us what happened’ even though they hadn’t, worked an absolute treat
I had no friends at school, so it wouldn't work on me.
your parents already told us what happened
the janitor told US what happened
My "favorite" thing about all of this is when you lie to the police it's a crime, but when they lie to you they're just doing what they were trained to do.
It’s not illegal to lie to police it’s illegal to lie under oath
Bruh
Not really. If you confess to a crime because they lied to you about details, then that will be used against you in court. If I lie to a cop and it’s found that what I said wasent true, that will be used against me in court. It’s one sided
They’re literally trying to do the right thing lmao it’s not like a criminal is going to confess by saying pls, idk why you have a problem with investigators doing their job
@@giselefierros3522 You think it's their job to convince innocent people to confess to crimes they didn't commit?
innocent confessed due to lying of police and spent 17 years in prison .. What a disaster and shame for police.
Haven’t you heard? It’s just a few bad apples! Nothing to worry about
Shame on the judge.
Black people: "First time?"
That’s why you never speak to the police
@@operationlull3742 You just want anarchy, so it wouldn't matter anymore that you can't write.
From a police officer:
"Never talk to the police even if you're innocent because anything you say can be used as evidence against you. Invoke your right to the 5th amendment (this is not an admittance of guilt) and request a lawyer.
I keep that advice to heart
@JJM thanks didn't catch that, I was typing in a hurry for some reason
Absolutely, I need a lawyer, mouthed closed!!
@Chris King Further, "the right to remain silent" isn't nearly as absolute as many people think.
@@user-do2ev2hr7h When you're being questioned by police, it absolutely is absolute.
Me, someone with potential ASPD: Interesting, good to know :)
Having Chris Watts face in this “unfair interrogation” video is maybe not the best choice. He’s a monster
Agree
Put your sensitivity aside and understand that this is about interrogation techniques and how they are used by law enforcement personnel. This is clearly stated and the video used from his interrogation displayed this..it isn’t about Watts.
He is misunderstood
@@johnrick3508 No he is not.
The video wasn't focusing on Chris Watts. It was used as an example of interrogation.
Everyone should always remember that it’s their job to prove that you’re guilty not prove your innocence
What happened to innocent until proven guilty?
@@Orangecataura that’s a lie your guilty until proven innocent
@@Orangecataura Thats the job of the court, not the police.
it goes against constitution; so they can be demanded in the exact time they say that.
Do. Not. Talk. To. The. Police.
Guilty OR innocent. You need a lawyer.
Even when you get pulled over for speeding?
@@marcialoseslobo5029 Many youtube videos on that.
@@marcialoseslobo5029 give them license and rego. Don’t small talk, ask if you’re detained when he starts talking about other subjects
What if im a lawyer in the first place?
@@sometimesyougottagoforward3671 I like you.
If the cops really have enough evidence, they wouldn't need your confession!
Sometimes they do it for added evidence: see Dalia Dippolito
A confession can make the sentence heavier.
Good point King
Not really, sometimes they want to know where the bodies are like with Christopher
True
As a lawyer, the only four words you should say to the cops is: I WANT MY LAWYER.
The case of the police lying during interrogation is special to the USA. I haven't looked into for other countries but in Sweden the police cannot lie during the interrogation (ie make up evidence, witnesses etc). And I would be very surprised if you could do it in the other Nordic countries or Northern Europe (Germany etc).
**Moves to Sweden**
Imagine lying to a 17yo kid who just lost his mother that his own father identified him as the killer. It's no wonder the police are so rarely viewed kindly in the community. They just want to send someone to prison. It's a bonus if they're actually guilty.
You're assumption about the police and there ultimate goal seems a bit misguided. There are those police officers who will lock anyone up as long as it benefits them in a personal sense but to define all police officers under the same umbrella is not only dangerous but ignorant.
@@whome6415 Well when you figure out a way to tell the good from the bad let me know because they've all got the same uniform. Until then, I'm going to smile and nod and not trust a word they say.
@@hooliganbubsy7298 Have you been a "victim" of law enforcement?
@@whome6415 No I've just had bad experiences.
Clearly you watch too much TV. Or listen to advicates. I've talked to defense attorneys who feel the DAs take every case that gets near them. But... 100% of defense atty clients in court are charged. Their perception is wrong when you look at all suspects in all cases. When a DA says "i know he probably did it, but I can't likely prove it in court, so I refuse the case" no defense attorney is bemoaning his innocent client being charged. Their perception is innaccurate. You might get rousted by cops 100 times. But you can't say that cops roust every one. Your experience is only you. Yet you blame the cop who reacts impoperly because all his minority contacts were negative against him, so he judges all minority contacts with caution or apprehension. If you do it, why be surprised when cops do it?
None of these taped conversations should have ever happened because the only thing you should ever say when questioned by the police is, "I want an attorney."
I'm useless right now at law terminologies and would like something cleared up. What's the difference between a lawyer and an attorney?
@@steviebro0538 No difference, it's the same thing.
@@steviebro0538 they are spelled and pronounced differently
Any more tips?
And they will say "only someone guilty would say that". But that should leave you unphased because unless they can prove something that statement doesn't mean anything.
My Dad's a retired sheriff here in Texas. Even he says, do NOT talk to police other than to ask for your attorney to be present for any questioning.
1 pretend to be your ally, to make you feel comfortable (e.g. Bring coffee etc.)
2 positive confrontation: they let you know you are guilty and ask why (false proofs: witnesses, video, dna, prints)
3 shut down denials immediately to break your confidence, create feeling that you can't modify the idea of you being guilty
4 minimization of crime to let you confess (e. G. everybody would have done the same in that situation etc ) plus alternative questions (e.g. Is this how you Want to be remembered by your kids? Or: did your father done it? Or: it could have been an accident..)
My lawyer is a humble guy. He told me if I ever talk to police about anything, without him present, he will kick my teeth out. I think it might be pretty serious advise to not talk to police even when you're innocent.
😂
Lmao
Beaing a policeman is like being a criminal "for the greater good"...but you're also a criminal, in the end.
@@drjp4212 If lying is legal to trigger a confession than how does it make them criminal?
@@danielarthur2915 because even an innocent person can end up confessing and going to jail.
It breaks my heart when I think about how many innocent people are sitting in prison after being tricked into confessing to crimes they didn't commit.
Ya, unfortunately investigators often want an arrest more than the truth
Yeah they did it to me 2 years ago, still awaiting a trial but I got lucky they didn’t arrest me…
@@nicholasdoyle5350 really omg I hope things go well for you you have my prayers
I makes me very, very angry
That’s the issue with interrogation. You have no idea why you are there and being told, not asked, told that you murdered someone is a shock. And most people brains just kinda misfire and they will do whatever the police want for it to be over.
even if you know you're innocent and you just want to provide helpful information, NEVER talk with them. they're never on your side. their ultimate goal is ALWAYS to get a confession
This is seriously effed up. Thanks for spreading awareness.
When they said to that man "We are 100% sure ur guilty". He could just reply "Then why am i still sitting here? " Checkmate
That's savage bro though i think it can possibly be perceived as a confession.
checkmate is not saying anything
Man: Would a lawyer think so?
Police: Yes
Man: Then I want one before I continue.
1:50 thats basically what he meant by "so if im on the video camera...?"
@@seriousclown4139 no it cannot lmfao. A confession has to be a confession. Words can’t be twisted around and used as a confession, that defeats the whole purpose.
What OP is saying that if they actually have you on video, they wouldn’t waste their time trying to get a confession because a video is open and shut evidence
The Police: "Can we talk?"
Me: "Lawyer."
The police: Ca...
Me:Lawyer.
The Police: "Can we talk?"
Me:
🤐
Police: can we talk?
Me: to my lawyer. Blank stares
@@liquidsleepgames3661 The police : you want some soda?
@@michaelpetrovich5353 i'll take a liter of lawyer.
just burn the word “lawyer” into your brain and you’ll never be wrongly convicted of a crime. Even if you did do the crime.
If I did do the crime, how can I be wrongly convicted?!
@@uku5252 some lawyers are great and juries are convinced
@@uku5252 Because according to the law, a correct conviction is only the one that can be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
@@uku5252 😂😂👌
dont commit crimes though
1:53 is the perfect example why you NEVER talk to the cops and ALWAYS should ask for a lawyer, innocent or otherwise.
Remember.. You have the right to remain silent. When they tell you that you are allowed to leave whenever you want to leave... LEAVE QUIETLY AND QUICKLY.
True
Are you really allowed to leave? How does that work?
@@camello321 When someone says that you have the right to remain silent... take that advice.... when they say that you are allowed to leave because you are not under arrest.... you most certainly are allowed to leave so the only thing to do is.... leave. They are skilled at trapping people into saying and doing things that help them out with their investigation and that’s not your responsibility... translation is: shut your mouth and kindly leave because it’s your right. Never let go of your rights because that’ll mean you’re losing your freedom.
@@JH-bf7be thanks for explaining man apreciate it👍
@@JH-bf7be This needs to be on a billboard somewhere.
As George Washington said
― “It's better to offer no excuse than a bad one.”
Let’s get Presidential
@@fuccboisanchez6506 lol
Perfect quote!
HOW TRUE.
It's even better to say, I need my lawyer
Never EVER consent to a police interrogation. Also when a suspect refuses to do so, and lawyers up instead, do not automatically consider him suspicious or guilty. He might just be smart. 🤷♀️
They interrogated my innocent cousin for abusing his son when it was really his ex girlfriend. She actually got her children taken away while he was in prison, but she didn't get locked up. The video file of the interrogation was said to be corrupted. My cousin said they kept trying to force him to admit his guilt and wouldn't listen to him. They said he did but he says they lied. Also he's illiterate, I bet they took advantage of that. Sounds fishy to me.
Haha I like the guy at 1:27 reacting to their lies. "We got witnesses" "Great!" "We got video camera." "Perfect!!"
Check out JCS channel that hes given a link for. That really was an innocent guy. The other examples are of actual murderers. JCS really shows it well. But videos are longer.
yet he still rotted in prison for over 2 years of his life for something he had no part of.
No he didnt
@@JudahMaccabee_ Three days, if I remember correctly, and the investigator was suspended without pay for that stunt.
@@JudahMaccabee_
He didn’t. He was in prison for 2-3 days and he won a lawsuit.
why do cops win?
they've done this before and this is your first time.
Rookie.
Unless you are Jeff
@@theother2166 that was his zeroeth time.
he wasn't guilty - so that's different.
but I hear you
Jeff is a legend.
@@theother2166 Jeff who?
@@kianhughes6309 Look up "The Legend of Jeff" on the channel "JCS - Criminal Psychology". It's a great watch.
@@kianhughes6309 Lmao that "Jeff who?" reminded me of Elon Musk
There's a scene in The Wire where police interrogate a teen by telling him that this (copy machine) is a new lie detector which feels your heartbeat and prints out a "True or False" paper after he answers each question.. "The machine tells the truth son".
He fell for it, confessed as the cops walk away, head high and say "the bigger the lie the more they believe".
I was actually in this situation recently. Thankfully it was a pre-employment polygraph exam and not a criminal interrogation, but it was still one of the worst experiences of my entire life. I ended up "failing," despite the fact that I was completely truthful throughout the exam. The techniques they use make you doubt things that you were previously 100% certain about, and they raise the tension in the room so high that you fee like your only way out is to admit to something, even if it isn't true.
Here's a much more detailed account of my experience if anybody is interested in reading, which I'll have to break down into several comments:
The exam was conducted by a company called Northland Investigations, and by the owner of this company, Dan Caputo. I name him because I think it is important that these individuals stand by their behavior, and not be shielded by anonymity.
Anyhow, the experience was extremely bizarre from the moment I step into the exam room. When I first walk into the exam room, I'm holding a cup of coffee, of which I've drunken about a half of. Upon seeing this, Caputo basically jumps out of his seat and goes "Oh, let me take that from you, we don't like when people drink coffee, it changes your physiology." Mind you, along with the pre-exam questionnaire I was sent a list of instructions for the exam, which included things like not drinking alcohol 24 hours before the test, trying to get adequate sleep, not being sick, etc. Nowhere on this form did it say anything about not drinking coffee. So, Caputo was essentially playing mind games from the minute I walk into the exam room. What was also strange (and I promise I'm not saying this to sound petty) was that it appeared Caputo was wearing a shirt that seemed too small for him in an attempt to try and accentuate his biceps. In the first few minutes of the pre-test phase, he proceeds with the typical good cop routine. He thanks me for applying at DPS, because "we need good people like you." He assures me that everybody's violated at least some of the requirements, but in his experience, most people who fail do so because they lie about the frequency of their transgressions. He even tells me that he used to work as a game warden, and even he broke some of the rules. The rest of the introduction was basically right out of TLBTLD, which unfortunately I hadn't read up to this point. He gives me the whole spiel about how the machine detects homeostasis based on your fight or flight response, and how you couldn't control it even if you wanted to, blah blah blah. (I was shocked when I read TLBTLD, because he was basically quoting it verbatim.)
As we moved into the pre-test interview portion of the exam, it became obvious that this would be a harsh interrogation, not an opportunity to "clarify your answers" as is so often (and misleadingly) described in polygraph jargon. As Caputo was looking over the question sheet, he, seemingly off the top of his head, goes "Have you ever like, fondled a girl while she was sleeping?" In hindsight, I'm confident that this was asked to make me uncomfortable and provide him an opportunity to observe my body language, because after asking a few more questions, he, much more seriously this time, goes "Have you ever fondled a girl while she was sleeping?" While I'm sure there's reasons relating to polygraphy that he continued to ask me this, I think the main reason was that he observed my level of discomfort at being asked this question and enjoyed watching me become angry and upset. As someone who has never and would never do something like this, being asked this question multiple times definitely succeeded in making me upset and extremely uncomfortable. Caputo's creepy physical appearance and demeanor certainly did nothing to assuage my feelings of discomfort (I would encourage you to Google this individual for a better idea of what I mean by this.)
The first time I went to answer a question, I responded by verbally stating "no," and Caputo goes "so this happens with about 40% of people who take polygraphs, it looks like you're talking with your gut…" and stated that he was going to administer the silent answer test. Following this, the first time I went to answer a question I did so by nodding my head, and Caputo angrily yells at me "HALF OF THAT MOVEMENT." So, when answering his questions, you could literally nod your head about three inches down for no, and about three inches to the right for yes. I'm 99% sure that this was an orchestrated tactic that he was going to use from the beginning, because a.) I've taken a polygraph before, and never was I told that I "talk with my gut," and needed to respond in this manner b.) I have a naturally low voice, and nobody who knows me would ever say that I "talk with my gut," c.) he orchestrated the silent answer test after asking me one question, so it's doubtful he expected CM's d.) I was able to get in touch with another gentleman who was administered a polygraph by Northland Investigations, and he told me that he was instructed to do the same exact thing. In the words of this gentlemen: "I'm at a loss how anyone can consider that stress position to not return negative physiological reactions." Obviously, this was exactly the point, as Caputo loved seeing the disconcerted state I was in.
So now, we're in the in-test phase of the examination, and Caputo starts with his round of questions. During this first round of questions, I'm unable to remember which questions I'm supposed to lie on, and accidentally answer one his questions wrong. When I do this, he again angrily yells at me "YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO ANSWER NO TO THAT QUESTION." I remember wondering why he yelled at me when it was his fault for not explaining the directions clearly, and now I realize that it was all a part of his plan. After re-explaining the directions in a very annoyed manner, Caputo re-starts the exam, and I try my best to recall which questions I'm supposed to lie on, and which questions I'm supposed to tell the truth on. In addition to this, I'm trying to make sure that I don’t move my head more than a few inches to the side, or too quickly. Apparently, I did this a couple of times, and Caputo proceeds to bitterly remind me "HALF OF THAT MOVEMENT." So, I'm sitting there trying to focus on answering his questions correctly, as well as trying my best to refrain from making too large of a movement, when Caputo suddenly yells in my ear "STOP TRYING TO THROW OFF THE MACHINE." He did not provide me with any specifics as to what I was allegedly doing to try to "throw off the machine," and I am highly confident that this was done to make me even more uncomfortable and increase his chances of eliciting a confession. In addition, Caputo reveled in my discomfort, and thoroughly enjoyed the pain he was inflicting onto me.
At this point, I am extremely annoyed, frustrated, and exhausted, and Caputo realizes this and launches into full on interrogation mode. He tells me that something is "on my mind" and proceeds to angrily shove his papers in my face and yell "WELL LOOK AT THIS," "HOW ABOUT THIS," "YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER SOMETHING," "LOOK AT THIS ONE AGAIN." I continue to look at his papers and deny his accusations while he continues to badger me, and I believe he said something like "well let's try this one more time," and hooks me back up to the recording instruments. After asking me I think two questions, he gets up out of his chair, storms over to me, unhooks me from the tubes, and angrily storms out of the room. The manner in which he concluded the exam is without a doubt the most unprofessional and immature action that I have ever witnessed in my entire life, and I want to make it crystal clear that that is not an exaggeration of any kind. I sat there shocked and bewildered at the fact that any adult, or individual associated with law enforcement, would behave in such a manner. Even for the standards of polygraph examiners, this was shameless and unprofessional.
As he is leaving the room, he makes sure to make an extremely petty comment about not forgetting the cup of coffee I mentioned earlier, and sarcastically says "sorry that it cooled." I'm sure he was building up to making that comment the second he saw me walk in with a cup of coffee.
After he storms out of the room, I'm escorted back to the lobby by an HR associate, who can tell that I'm visibly upset. At this point, I know I'm out of the job, but am still stunned by what I had just witnessed.
In the words of Ugadda B "Everyday sadism is the most apt description I can provide of the experience." What I saw in the exam room that day was nothing short of cold-hearted evil. My experience that day made it clear that polygraphy is the instrument used by this individual to inflict pain onto others. The way he enjoyed my discomfort and reveled in my pain traumatizes me to this day, nearly five months after my exam. Since this examination, I've been offered two jobs that would have required polygraphs but have turned them down because of the lingering effects of this experience. Looking back on this day, there are about ten different times that I should have gotten up and walked out the exam room but didn’t because of how much I wanted the job. Of course, I now realize that even if I had been offered the job, it would not have been worth subjecting myself to this kind of mistreatment. What I also realize is that polygraph examiners routinely take advantage of people while they're in a vulnerable state, allowing them to act in a way that no other circumstance would allow them to. If you are in the midst of a polygraph examination and your examiner begins to act this way, allow them to take your job opportunity, but do not allow them to take your dignity and peace of mind.
Last of all, shame on the police departments and government agencies that employ these individuals, and the polygraph organizations that enable this type of behavior. In this specific instance, shame on the Arizona Department of Public Safety, and shame on the American Polygraph Association. I know that having no shame is a prerequisite to being a polygraph examiner, but this is just embarrassing, and cruel.
There's something seriously messed up when you have to tell a person that's 100% innocent that they have to stay quiet when the police try to talk to them or else they could end up going to prison. Instead of making a confession the goal, how about priortizing getting the truth?
Exactly
In my country there is a talk but you will write down your officiql account, manipulation isn't part of the story.
It wouldn't be efficient. Even if only 90%, of all accused people are actually guilty, this method is way faster than only looking after objective truth. Their goal is to build a solid enough case to determine the most likely scenario.
@@Bladings False positives diminish efficiency too. Not to mention the fact that speed is NOT of the essence. The suspect is caught. The time spent in court is because of procedure, not how hard it is to find the truth. These things are more complicated than that.
@@Bladings It sounds like a question then of do you want to get this done as quickly and conveniently as possible, or do you want it done right. Keep in mind how many innocent people have gone to prison over the years because of this "efficient" method.
My father is a retired police offer and taught me you never ever talk to the police if you are arrested and immediately ask for a lawyer. Even if they tell you oh you are staying here over night until we get you one. Nope that’s fine I’ll wait for my lawyer.
What's the first thing an LEO will do if suspected of wrong doing or violating policy? He gets his union lawyer! Cops are the biggest hypocrites, next to politicians.
What do you do if your innocent and stay a night in jail anyways? What do you do?
@@yayger825 bruh even if yu have to stay weeks never confess or talk to them yu could spend 50 years in jail just saying 1 sentence.
I wish I had a father or relative who told me this.
@@jackma3730 Except while in jail, just to keep yourself alive you may THEN end up having to do something that will give them a legitimate reason to now keep you there. That's the trick and the danger.
JCS criminal psychology is an awesome channel. I really hope they start uploading content again. Thanks for the shout out to them!
This video is one of the best videos I’ve watched on UA-cam
"You're not under arrest, you can walk out any time."
"Aight duces..."
i wonder what they would have done had he took the guy seriously
@@TheGeckoNinja Nothing, legally. There's video saying he's free to go.
Lol. I kept wondering why that guy didn't leave.
@@Carmi766 People think they are smart
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 Exactly, and police purposely prey on that by inflating their ego with flattery.
Never trust anyone who’s comfortable lying to your face and when accused tells you it’s just their job oh, I see. You were just following orders
“I’ve been at the mercy of men just following orders. Never again.” -Magneto
We were told in the academy we could lie to suspects, bluff them, use scare tactics to intimidate them.
Law enforcement in the USA today isn't about seeking justice. Its about controlling the population. Not doing the right thing.
@@weasel9062 I'm happy to say that this is not how police work everywhere!
Here, the police are NOT allowed to lie to you about evidence - or at all!
Besides, although the confession can help the investigation, it will never be proof!.
A false confession can turn the investigation in the wrong direction if the police believe it.
A confession or a witness statement can never stand alone! Back it up with real technical evidence.
@@michaelbarletta1024 You beat me to it.
Is this supposed to be an anti-cop comment? If so...it's pretty daft. There is a major difference between getting a confession, and a false confession. When only 1% of confessions end up being false confessions...that's a pretty good 'win' rate. And with criminal science getting better and better every day...many people can be proven innocent with evidence if they give a false confession.
But I guess we can start forgetting about criminal science since all of these dummies want to defund the police. So now we'll just start seeing people locked up for no reason more often.
Perhaps once you have a major crime done to you or your family...you'll magically 'get' why detectives and interrogations exist.
Equally so, instead of doing what we do and the rest of the civilized world does...we could just start doing what 70% of the other chunk of the world does within their interrogations...physical and mental torture. But hey, Americas cops are so big bad and evil...am I right?!
JCS is one of the best channels on UA-cam on interrogation techniques.
Feel like this channel to a huge twist and I love it
I've seen it in movies and assumed it's true. If they had all the evidence they needed for a conviction, they wouldn't be interrogating you, they'd simply arrest you.
Depends which country you are in.
They might be trying to get a confession just so you can't do anything in court to lessen your sentence
APOLOGIZE, NO TV FOR ME. BOOKS AND RESEARCH. CLIPS FROM INTERNET.
@@krajic582 No TV. Clips from internet.
I'm typing this on the internet from my TV.
Not exactly true, I have watched a lot of detective shows like the first 48 and even when they have their killer and evidence they usually try to get a confession to make the case even more solid.
How do you know you have a good lawyer? On the way to the interview, she hands you a tube of super glue and says "here, have some lip gloss"
Well . . it took me about four or five re- readings, and then it finally sunk in...good one .
@Luvjeet SINGH mouth, shut.
That's a good one
Wow what’s hard to get about that joke lol seriously 😂
@@jessicastern8597 some people think faster, some slower. Some use logic thinking, some imaginative or “feeling”. Hence, some jokes are obvious to you right away, some are not, to other people with the other type of thinking it is the other way around. Read “thinking fast and slow” about neuroscience, amazing book, then you will have more compassion towards people that have a different brain and won’t be as judgmental that they don’t understand the jokes you do :) It helped me at least cause I used to judge and get annoyed at slower people than me, but then I understood that I have an extremely fast scanning brain, which has its upsides and downsides (for instance I get bored easily if not properly engaged and it’s harder for me to stay on the same task for too long.) while people with slower brain are amazing divers and they can sit and do the same thing and enjoy it without much engagement, which is very useful in our world. I hope this makes it clearer for you
my main problem with any kind of interrogation at-least with me is the fact when someone says im lying and i tell them truthfully and honestly i did not i just smile and break out laughing instinctively to relive stress makes me look more guilty but i just find it hilarious that im being accused of something i did not do even if the evidence points in my direction
This is a simplistic explanation. Interrogators often use a variety of techniques in various order. Or of the interrogator is a seasoned vet they've more than likely created their own routine
When they say you're free to go:
"Awesome, thanks. I'll be leaving now."
I’d stay for a bit to build a bit of trust with the cops then I would say thanks for the talk I’m leaving now
@@captainahab5522 I think that’s why a lot of suspects being interrogated stay. They think they are smarter then the detectives and want the police to think they are helping with the investigation. From what I see in these videos is during interrogation of someone, the guilty will usually talk about everything that doesn’t really matter in the investigation. I see it a lot they will have the suspect taking about how they were doing a week before the murder and they get long detailed answers but once you get to the actual crime, the suspect won’t give any information on what happened that day. He somehow forgot.
The likes where at 420 but I had to... I’ll rip one for you guys 🤧
Notice the subtle psychological things they do. Put you in a small room, in the corner, table pushed against you, interrogator on each side. You’re boxes in. Wall behind you, to your left, interrogator, and table on your right, another one in front. And they always have more than one, to make you feel ganged up on.
actually most of the time what you're supposed to do is make them feel relaxed so instead you're supposed to seat them near the door (my source is the former spy-catcher/body language analyst that was on Wired)
That's when I tell them I'm claustrophobic and can they please give me my space, followed by. I have nothing to say, am I free to go now?
@@polyky Joe Navarro? Yeah, you’re right. When someone is relaxed, he/she has a better recall of what happened (whether he/she is guilty or innocent).
That room separates boys from men
@@casuallyplaying2553 yes! I'm bad with names
"I'm going to remain silent. I want a lawyer." Repeat that until they get it.
Chris Watts "I did not hurt THESE girls" He's totally detached himself. A loving father would say "I did not hurt MY girls"
JCS taught you well young padawan
Props to JCS - Criminal Psychology for shining light on these intriguing stories!
YES!
One of the best UA-cam’s!
They basically stole his content lol
@@dominikovesny907 They linked Criminal Psychology in their description ~
@@dominikovesny907 Yeah but this is a different topic and those interrogation videos are open for public
All these tactics are easily defeated by shutting your mouth completely.
No, they are defeated by asking for an attorney.
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 and the lawyer will tell you to: Shut your mouth. Tell the police nothing. the lawyer speaks to the police never yourself.
@@TheBelrick That is absolutely true. It is, however, extremely difficult to ask for an attorney by shutting your mouth completely. If you don't ask for an attorney, they'll just keep you in interrogation, asking you questions, indefinitely. If you aren't under arrest, you shouldn't be there anyway. If you are under arrest, you should request an attorney and THEN remain silent.
@Sounds Nice Yeah, you're going to jail
@Sounds Nice You mean like the kid in the video?
If I’m ever in this situation I’m going to cut him off in the most disrespectful and passive aggressive way while saying “I want a lawyer”
JCS - Criminal Psychology, one of my favorite channels!
It’s simple. Whether guilty or not. “I WANT MY LAWYER”
Especially if someone murders your wife, kidnaps your child, steals your gold coin collection or burns your house down, never talk to police investigators, lawyer or no lawyer. Miranda set the standard for you, so take advantage of it by keeping your mouth shut. Winning his case before the Supreme Court kept him out of jail and on the streets where he got knifed to death.
This x1000. Don't be rude about it but don't let the cops bully you or tell you anything else.
@@Reach41 he got knifed to death? For sure a sanctioned hitjob by the cartel of mobsters who hide in public offices.
@@jayyv5059 Either that or one of the street thugs who have so benefited from his Supreme Court case.
@@Kagemusha08 Is it OK for an eye witness or a victim to talk to police? If not, is that to protect them from the cops, or the other people in their neighborhood?
1. Request a lawyer
2. Do not answer any questions
3. If in doubt, see 1
Seems familiar...🤔
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 the more the merrier.
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 its all good man
We value the tips from each and every felon. Thanks necrosis.
People are just saying this without even knowing why cause other people are lol
The guy in your first clip just got out out the Mirana Warning.
I love this video it's very helpful (I'm writing a confession to the police scene and this is one of my main sources of information) thanks!
P.s. I highly recommened researching the Miranda Warning.
_Wiki search:_
In the United States, the Miranda warning is a type of notification customarily given by police to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) advising them of their right to silence; that is, their right to refuse to answer questions or provide information to law enforcement or other officials. These rights are often referred to as Miranda rights. The purpose of such notification is to preserve the admissibility of their statements made during custodial interrogation in later criminal proceedings.
Never let anyone know your vulnerable it’s key
Oh, so that's why in the movies they always ask for a lawyer
And i thought the characters were just being arrogant
feels, I always was like thats an admission of guilt but now il do it in a heartbeat
Lmao
I don't know if I would survive 17 years in prison for a crime I did not commit... 😭😭😭
i definitely wouldn't
@@lyndsay369 cry little baby
Chump.
@@tallsz559 you think you could survive 17 years in prison ? Lmao heres a hint , you wouldn't .
@@tallsz559 You would be what's colloquially known as a "prison wife".
Why on Earth is that man, "Chris", who killed his entire family, being defended here?
Not being defended he is just being used as an example.
@@mikeoxsor6183 definitely defended, no one is using it as example, on the video it barely sounds like an example but more like a victim of police "mind tricks"
@@AnonymousMachine no it is example
@Shuan Doyle oh looks like that’s settled then
I think when you get pushed that hard you either collapse or stick up for yourself. It's sad for the main under distress I can kind of understand that.
If you put enough pressure on someone they will say anything to get themselves out of a situation. People get flustered when being kidnapped and held by a large gang.
If that ever is your situation just remember when you get falsely locked up, there's going to be way worse people and you aren't getting out of that situation.
@@GTSN38 exactly. Either put up with verbal abuse from interrogators or put up with physical or even sexual abuse later from inmates
People have been trained to believe that if you’re innocent, you don’t need a lawyer. You MUST be hiding something….you should be doing everything in your power to help law enforcement, if you didn’t do anything wrong 🥴 Absolute malarkey! Law enforcement cares about closing cases, not so much whether they have the right person.
In some countries, they can beat you up for false confessions.
@@isitoveryet9525 Yea you want me behind bars you have to take me to court I’m not going to fall for this garbage I would call my lawyer
This legal lying is evil. Not everyone can afford a lawyer. How often do these lies “accidentally” find their way into the courtroom?
How often?
When ever the accused replies
It's not rocket science people:
Identify yourself , yes
Invoke your right to remain silent .
Maybe say 'lawyer'
That's it,
If you cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed to you.
@@antonyka-pra-ra just saying "lawyer" does not actually invoke your legal right to a lawyer. If you ask incorrectly, or in a way that can be twisted, then your request can be ignored.
Phrase the request instead as "I invoke my legal right to a lawyer, and am demanding a lawyer." Or something equally clear and un-twistable.
@@AllisonGhost I invoke my 5th amendment right
@@samanthamorgan8117 most of those are hired by the state and are against you
Videos like these are very interesting, do more!
Watched most of these cases on JCS channel, definitely worth watching the entire thing. Good rundown though.
if a cop told me i was free to go at anytime, i would just leave lol
For real my friend
right?? i dont understand why they stay
it is at that point theyll place you under arrest
@@MM-rr1kp bingooooo. Technically they ain’t lying. You can get up and walk out the door, but they don’t mention the consequences of doing it.
@@therealrickytan rather sit in jail for a few months and go to trial to beat the case with a lawyer rather than say the wrong thing and go to prison for my whole life
Once they have their suspect, interrogators will do anything to get 'the win'.
I read something about Prosecutors who do the same and even when there's clear evidence that the person is innocent they'll still push to get them in trouble because they want 'the win'
All you have to do is say you want an attorney, then they will stop questioning you until your attorney is present.
If attorneys refuse to turn over any exculpatory evidence, they can be disbarred and go to jail.
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 #1. A recent Supreme Court ruling made it more complicated. Look it up. #2. Sure, they CAN get in trouble, but outside of a few high profile cases where the prosecutor got caught and was nationally shamed, nothing happens. It gets worse: I went to a jury selection 2 years ago. The prosecutor straight up asked the prospective jurors if they would be willing to convict with no witnesses and no evidence, because she didn't have any witnesses or evidence. She admitted that the only thing she had was the testimony of a cop who was taking the side of the so-called injured party. Everyone she asked said yes, they would be willing to convict only on the say-so of a cop who didn't witness anything. My first thought was how many blow jobs he got for it, and second, wtf? No witnesses, no evidence, but these yahoos are willing to send some poor sod to prison for years, just because. You think YOU'RE a nihilist? Hold my beer.
@@edennis8578 You expect me to believe that during voir dire a prosecuting attorney said that and the defense attorney said nothing? The judge said nothing? How did they even get an indictment with no evidence and no witnesses? What country was this in, because it certainly wasn't in the United States. What you are describing is it no way based in reality. If an attorney said that in court, the case would be summarily dismissed.
They prefer 'the win' to the right guy or the truth.
What a crazy feeling it must be to be sitting in that interrogation room, and be guilty. And then you confess, and then realize, I'm never going to be free again. Talk about a bad day.
If every one was smart enough to shut up and get a lawyer, we wouldn't have all these great videos.
When someone says "I'm not lying to you", it triggers an alarm. 🚨
Same with 'To be honest...' I once heard a judge freak out when someone said that. He said: 'I hate when people say that. Why do you have to say you are going to be honest if you are? It makes me question you.'
@@tarawalsh-arpaia3928 If the following sentence is an uncommon opinion or an embarrassing fact for the speaker, it might be true. "To be honest, I had drunk too much. I'm ashamed."
It can also be a way to hide something even worse, but we should not see evil everywhere.
I was thinking the same thing, that would’ve been the giveaway for me.
This jerk was a customer of mine, if you want to call it that. During breakfast all he did was tear my company apart and say, he wouldn't be able to keep his branch open with our products and prices.
later that year, I was with another customer at a Sushi restaurant and this guy walked in and we both knew him. The guy I was with said oh, there is Mister X, he is a real nice guy. Then as we left and walked by him and said our hello's, the guy with me said he is a nice guy again as we left.
"I swear to God," is another one.
I been in this situation and I never folded
Watching every JCS video got me being a pro in these videos
The four magic steps to not spend the night in jail:
1. Do not talk to the police
2. Do not talk to the police
3. DO NOT TALK TO THE POLICE
4. DO ask for a lawyer and to be immediately dismissed
So, there's really only one step. Tell them you want an attorney. Telling the police that you want an attorney is very difficult to do if you don't talk to the police.
and may I add: do not talk to the fcking police.
@@jobob47 Good luck.
5: Defund them out of existence and replace them with publically elected accountable officials like the Sheriff's department.
@@russianbot4418 🙄
I’ll always remember what my lawyer professor said to me in class: Most police don’t care if they convict the person who committed the crime, they just want a conviction for the crime. That’s why you shut up and ask for your lawyer.
Disgusting
Nice people with badges who originally are supposed to serve the average person, to fight and protect us
It's literally their job. Just like the attorney's job is to get you out, regardless of whether you're guilty or not. Very few people understand this, but there are incentives at play that have nothing to do with justice. And that's ok! Having both sides represented fairly gives us a better chance of reaching the correct verdict.
@@Cowtymsmiesznego If the cops only care about getting a conviction and your level of defense largely depends on whether or not you can afford a good lawyer, how do poor people get fairly represented?
@@potatoking2217 Arguably, there's no guarantee that the cops or the prosecutor are any good either. For a lot of cases, there is a state prosecutor and a state attorney, which you could say is "fair". But of course it's not always the case - I'd say that absolutely if the state really wants a conviction, or they are up against rich people who can afford expensive lawyers, poor people are at a disadvantage.
Needless to say, this is still much better than not having attorneys at all and having to "trust" one side of the proceeding.
that video duane did with that other detective was very insightful
Ryan waller comes to mind when I think about assumptions gone wrong.
RIP
I feel like I'm cheating on JCS by being here right now. I'ma see myself out.
i felt the same haha
Ahahahaha so true
haha
😂😂😂
JCS doesn't put out enough. A man has needs.
The innocent guy’s interrogator actually got demoted for his actions during that interrogation.
Really
@@homerogarzajr1787 jcs criminal psychology good channel been hooked on it for days
@@rangeman209 Thx for LMK
Demoted? Shouldn't he be fired? Wtf
@@uhhhhname9414 i don't think he should be fired, the guy didn't go to jail. But the demotion was rightly deserved for faking information when he didn't really know the guy was the actual suspect
Great work on this video. The amount of research sounds like sleepless nights lol
"You should be aware whenever you feel that your interrogator is your ally"
Never go to the station for "questioning." If they want you to go, ask: "Am I under arrest?" If not don't go. Don't end up in that little room.
Well if you actually did it that’s a good idea
@@lachlanchester8142 It’s a good idea if you didn’t do it, too. Did you even watch the video and see how cops can use psychological manipulation to get a false confession out of an innocent person?
Nothing boils my blood more than the idea of being falsely convicted. In my humble opinion, 100 true convictions are not worth one false conviction.
I agree
It's a tough situation, and I agree about false convictions, but leaving all the criminals go to prevent one false conviction is clearly a losing viewpoint. You end up with 99 victims without justice, and most likely dozens of new victims from the freed criminals recidivism. I don't know how one would justify more victims rather than less.
Ben Franklin's quote "That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer.."
@@imnotabotrlyimnot I agree with you. I get the point the comment is trying to make but objectively it’s better that 99 criminals are behind bars than 99 criminals getting to be free just so that 1 instance doesn’t happen. Also, there are other ways innocent people can be convicted. They can be framed or set up by the true perpetrator, doing so in a way that tampers with physical evidence (which is supposed to be a super reliable form of evidence). So like, as sad as it is, I believe it’s almost impossible for innocent people to never be falsely charged. If the hypothetical 99 people are murderous criminals, it’s just safer for society that they aren’t free at the cost of one innocent person being in jail
You are completely correct.
This is a biblical notion.
That it is better for a man to be potentially released that is guilty of a crime than an innocent man convicted falsely of a crime.
A lot of the world has forgotten this, and also that while we must strive for justice in this world, those who are guilty of evil will still face judgement of that evil when they die and will reap the due consequence.
Great video that again underscores why you should never talk to police. Even things that seem innocent or helpful to say will be twisted and used against you. Innocent or guilty, shut your yap, and keep it shut, and don't succumb to the manipulative tactics used by cops to get you to start talking.
That’s so insane.. they literally trick you into admitting wether you did or didn’t
If I got wrongfully convicted of murdering my parents and subsequently spent 17 years in prison, I'd be going back 6 months later for murdering the detective who coersed the false confession out of me
YOU opened your mouth. You are responsible for convicting you.
6 months? Dude i will ask my inmate to save me my cell cuz i will be back in 3 hours.
@@yoyo762 An average person does not have the ability to endure a professionally trained psychological abuser. Don't blame the victim.
@@novacorponline If you do not educate yourself , your children or family, I WILL blame you for your willful ignorance of your rights.
Its sad that homegrown citizens CHOOSE to be so ignorant of their rights while immigrants to this country study, embrace and exercise their new found rights.
If you don't want to exercise your rights, don't try to play the victim card with me.
Trained interrogators have NO power when you say " I don't answer questions. I want a lawyer".
Clarification: by "you", I mean you personally, not the general "you" used to generalize. I do not approve of victim blaming, victim blaming is bad.
"I'm not lying to you" - totally not a liar
I’ve interrogated many criminals. I know I may be biased. But I’ll never understand how or why an innocent person would confess to something they didn’t do. It doesn’t matter what I’m being told I would not confess to something I didn’t do. Period.
Some people may be mentally weak or just strained after hours of interrogation. They forget that every word they say can be used against them. Like that guy who quickly recounted his story of how he accidentally killed his parents
Thanks I'll ise this for future references
When talking to police, all you should say is "I want an attorney"
Police: hey how are you doing?
Suspect: I want an attorney
Police: We just want to talk to you
Suspect: I want to talk to my attorney
Police: Can I get you a cup of coffee?
Suspect: You can get me my attorney
Or a phone call to get an attorney
Perfect 👌
I completely agree. Perhaps we can add a qualifier?:
Except maybe during a minor traffic stop when you’re just going to pay the ticket and get on with life anyway. No need to put them on edge. Lawyer up fast if the conversation goes anywhere other than the reason they give first for having pulled you over. ESPECIALLY if it goes toward looking in your car for any reason at all. They should carry their own tissues, they have no right to look, and you have no obligation to consent, so that’s when OP’s wisdom comes into play. The attorney will explain to them why you’re not giving them the opportunity to plant anything, which the good apples will actually understand. Only the bad cops will be pissed at being denied that opportunity, right?
Get me my attorney holding me a cup of coffee :D
@@goldeneagle3678 Perfect!
As someone who has suffered emotional abuse, watching this was so terrifying. The tricks and process is basically the same and I'm many ways, identical
The reason is because in both cases manipulation is used. However, in an emergency or crisis situation, things that would normally be considered unacceptable are permitted to save lives and mitigate damage.
Gaslighting vs professional gaslighting
But why would you admit to something you know you didnt do ? That doesn't make any sense.
@@Optim40 Because when psychological torture is used, it can trick the brain into believing things that aren't true. It is how psychological abusers trick their victims into thinking they deserve the abuse.
With police interrogations, these tactics are necessary most often, because it gets the guilty to confess. But, I'm just saying that it can unintentionally obtain false confessions as well.
@@keithmayhewhammond5357 Nah I don't buy that. I think if you do that then you should go to prison.
Yup for sure right when they get you into a interview room .. ask for a lawyer.!!!!
Thats why you always refuse to speak to them unless you have a solicitor/lawyer present
Here's what you need to do: ask "Am i being detained?" if they say no walk away. If they say yes respond to everything they say with "Give me a lawyer". Say nothing else. Do not 'ask' for a lawyer. Do not ask if they think you need a lawyer. Do not listen to them tell you what demanding a lawyer means for you. Speak with confidence and DEMAND a lawyer without a single doubt in their mind that you will bend on the subject. NEVER confess to anything. It doesn't matter if you're standing there holding onto a knife that is still sticking out of someones chest and they are playing HD video of you stabbing the guy who banged your wife. There's no need to rush.
why are you saying this with such passion?
@@iamURHO Why are you asking that question? Are you a cop?
@@iamURHO because I'm passionate.
@@iamURHO Because of the number of innocent people who have been tricked, coerced, bullied into a confession. For each person who it made to confess when they are innocent, not only is their life ruined but it can also mean murders are out there walking around free.
lmfaoooo