Why Israel has a terrible geography

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 лис 2023
  • Go to ground.news/caspian to stay fully informed. Get 40% off unlimited access during their biggest sale of the year. Sale ends November 30.
    For over 75 years, #Israel has existed in a state of perpetual #conflict, each time facing battles that could have been its last. This stalemate, as disagreeable as it may be, is unlikely to improve anytime soon.
    Support CaspianReport
    ✔ UA-cam membership ► / @caspianreport
    ✔ Patreon ► / caspianreport
    ✔ PayPal ► www.paypal.me/caspianreport
    ✔ Merchandise ►teespring.com/stores/caspianr...
    Crypto endorsement
    ✔ Bitcoin ► 1MwRNXWWqzbmsHova7FMW11zPftVZVUfbU
    ✔ Ether ► 0xfE4c310ccb6f52f9D220F25Ce76Dec0493dF9aA0
    ✔ Bitcoin Cash ► 1BKLti4Wq4EK9fsBnYWC91caK7NZfUhNw9
    Join us on Facebook or Twitter
    ✔ Twitter ► / caspianreport
    ✔ Facebook ► / caspianreport
    ✔ My equipment and editing software ► www.amazon.com/shop/caspianre...
    Watch CaspianReport in other languages
    ✔ Spanish ► / historiageopol%c3%adtica
    ✔ Russian ► / thecuriouscat
    #ad #sponsored

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,5 тис.

  • @CaspianReport
    @CaspianReport  6 місяців тому +106

    Go to ground.news/caspian to stay fully informed. Get 40% off unlimited access during their biggest sale of the year. Sale ends November 30.

    • @Zeyede_Siyum
      @Zeyede_Siyum 6 місяців тому +5

      No

    • @winstonmaraj8029
      @winstonmaraj8029 6 місяців тому +1

      ​@@Zeyede_SiyumYESSSSSSSSSS!!! ❤❤❤❤

    • @montypythonator
      @montypythonator 6 місяців тому +2

      A fantastic analysis of the real politik of the situation.

    • @user-op8fg3ny3j
      @user-op8fg3ny3j 6 місяців тому +12

      0:39 "Hostile neighbours" yet you left out the fact they have peace treaties with their neighbouring Arab countries.

    • @hornerfarah2282
      @hornerfarah2282 6 місяців тому +7

      1:31 in this map you depicts Jerusalem and especially the east Jerusalem to be part of Israel when in reality it's not Israel it's occupied territory that occupied by Israel under international law. So why you put it in your videos?

  • @tomislav5689
    @tomislav5689 6 місяців тому +293

    I really appreciate topographical map you used 4:05, use it regularly, we can understand maps much better like that.

    • @arthogof
      @arthogof 6 місяців тому +5

      agreed, that is an excellent map

    • @dildou8856
      @dildou8856 6 місяців тому +4

      yes agreed, thanks for highlighting this

  • @user-sn1lu5yi6r
    @user-sn1lu5yi6r 6 місяців тому +339

    One point this video fails to mention is the value of the Negev Desert in terms of flat land mass and width. This southern desert not only hosts Israel's only advanced nuclear facility producing vast quantities of nuclear fuel for it's weapons programmes as well as two of the Jewish States largest and most advanced military air ports hosting their most advanced F35I stealth 4th generation fighters.

    • @healord51
      @healord51 6 місяців тому +12

      So they are basically hiding their big toys.

    • @Ryan-uk6zq
      @Ryan-uk6zq 6 місяців тому +27

      5th gen

    • @user-sn1lu5yi6r
      @user-sn1lu5yi6r 6 місяців тому +23

      @@healord51 In an open desert. But sure......

    • @adamk4775
      @adamk4775 6 місяців тому +24

      The Negev desert also serves as a huge training ground for the IDF. A lot of the IDF's training bases are located there.

    • @user-sn1lu5yi6r
      @user-sn1lu5yi6r 6 місяців тому

      Yep. For sure. Inlcuding a huge / live ammo outdoor facility used for urban warfare training jointly used by both the IDF and US Army / Marines. @@adamk4775

  • @navetal
    @navetal 6 місяців тому +343

    A small mistake I noticed in the video: You've marked the Golan Heights in green with the rest of Israel in 1948 and pre-war 1967 when it was still in Syrian hands, only to later switch it to blue in the aftermath of the six day war.
    Edit: another mistake: at 16:03, you put Hezbollah flags in the West Bank, though as far as I know they only operate in Lebanon and Syria.

    • @lordlorian81
      @lordlorian81 6 місяців тому +24

      Its a probability of what can happen if west bank not controlled

    • @stnln2180
      @stnln2180 6 місяців тому

      Good point. Those who are against Israel conveniently forget that those land that Israel is supposedly occupied was "occupied" as the result of Muslim attacks. If Muslims haven't tried to invade Israel those lands would continue to be under Muslims control.
      Another important correction, Gaza is poor not because it has "no strategic values" whatever it supposed to mean but because it is under control of Hamas Jihadists (hopefully not for long).
      It's literally Islamic Halifax with Sharia laws as the laws of the land.

    • @henk7591
      @henk7591 6 місяців тому +29

      There's more. He also makes it look like the Arab states were the ones to attack in 1967, while Israël started the war by attacking Egyptian airfields. See 13:29. Israëli officials later stated that there was no sign Arab nations were planning an attack so this is quite a miss to be honest.

    • @stnln2180
      @stnln2180 6 місяців тому

      @@henk7591
      You conveniently forgot that Egypt expelled UN peacekeepers who had been stationed in the Sinai Peninsula since the Suez conflict, and announced a blockade of Israel's access to the Red Sea (international waters) via the Straits of Tiran, which was an act of war against Israel.

    • @razahassan8755
      @razahassan8755 6 місяців тому +7

      I was confused too, Hezbollah acting in the West Bank would be a nightmare for Israel. Also, he forgot Lebanon when talking about the 1947-1949 war.

  • @Tygrus758
    @Tygrus758 6 місяців тому +153

    Thank you for providing this context for this ongoing conflict in that region. It cannot be overstated how much we need more coverage that educates rather than propagates.

    • @leandersearle5094
      @leandersearle5094 6 місяців тому +3

      Did you mean propagandizes?

    • @Tygrus758
      @Tygrus758 6 місяців тому

      @@leandersearle5094 no because the spreading of ideas simply for the sake of spreading them is more dangerous to ignorant people in the world than only having to deal with biased information propagating.
      An educated person knows that nuclear physics isn't biased information, but that doesn't stop an educated person from knowing that we should be careful how we propagate that knowledge and who we propagate it to responsibly.
      Jane Elliott jas a white that I must paraphrase, but it is something to the effect of "the job of education is to lead the student away from ignorance."
      Education provides awareness and context that a flood of propagated yet useless information cannot replace.

    • @leandersearle5094
      @leandersearle5094 6 місяців тому

      @@Tygrus758 I'm afraid I don't understand your point from the perspective of it. I understand sorting out chaff/noise from useful information, but you seem to be advocating for the removal of useful information simply because there is too much of it (and that's as much charity as I can give you). I agree that having information collated for you is handy, but I can't agree to the statement that there must be a filter between people and information.

    • @Tygrus758
      @Tygrus758 6 місяців тому +1

      @@leandersearle5094 so you believe that a person that learned a new lesson yesterday should begin teaching, as an expert, the very next day? That wouldn't be very educated. It's acheivable with propaganda and propagated media though.
      We moderate information daily because people are overwhelmed by too much information. Propagating information for the sake of propagation is damaging. Just look at the world we live in today.
      Educational media and Propagandized media are separated by their motivation towards the ignorant people learning the information. Education encourages critical thinking and further education while propaganda needs the opposite. Propagated media only needs to be spread because there is no consideration for whether the information helps or hurts.

    • @leandersearle5094
      @leandersearle5094 6 місяців тому

      @@Tygrus758 To answer your one question: in a sense, yes. People learning should be sharing their knowledge with other students and with those who haven't learned yet (I did catch that you said "as an expert," but that would be impossible, and I chose to extend the grace of ignoring a dishonest phrase).
      As for propagation, most people already filter the information given to them, through ignoring it, and it's only when *forced* to engage (such as being pressured to take a side in a conflict) that they will imbibe chaff as useful information and discard useful information as chaff.
      The is no limiting principal on requiring "experts" for roles. It must be opposed externally, or it will push inexorably toward any and all ad rediculum arguments that can be made. THAT is what we observe today.
      A responsible citizen in a republic NEEDS access to as much information as possible to make an informed decision. The erosion of this principal is currently leading to tyranny in *every* Western nation, and infantilizing the populace can and will only make the problems worse.

  • @Stafford674
    @Stafford674 6 місяців тому +702

    In your map of the 1967 war you show the West Bank as Israeli. The truth is that it was part of Jordan, who annexed it themselves in 1949. This is one subject in which it is essential to stick to objective truth as far as possible. You have also missed out the 1956 War. In general I like and value your videos.

    • @noamtashma617
      @noamtashma617 6 місяців тому +133

      And also, the gaza strip was occupied by egypt at the same time

    • @sambenjamin7515
      @sambenjamin7515 6 місяців тому +33

      And yom kipur war

    • @leme5639
      @leme5639 6 місяців тому

      also, arabs started those wars, and Israel is more an European state than an Asian.

    • @AndyFromBeaverton
      @AndyFromBeaverton 6 місяців тому +104

      Jordan renounced its claim to the territory in 1988. Jordan didn’t want a Palestinian state next to them that would have sovereignty, borders, and a military that could work to take over the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, which the Palestinians did try to do in September 1970.

    • @jtgd
      @jtgd 6 місяців тому +110

      @@AndyFromBeavertonfor some reason, lots ignore the actions of Arab countries regarding Palestine, and the lack of a Palestinian state can be blamed not just on Israel, but Palestinian extremists and even several Arab states.
      This conflict is legitimately complex and genuinely complicated. I don’t get why people suggest it isn’t

  • @joelcohenx
    @joelcohenx 6 місяців тому +1375

    Finally someone that explains the complexity of the issue. Regardless of which political side you identify with, any claim for a simple "just do this" solution is completely ignorant of the complexity.

    • @zgoodt
      @zgoodt 6 місяців тому +203

      It is not complex and never were, just piss off from the land you stole, and let the Palestinians live in peace.

    • @j.k.6865
      @j.k.6865 6 місяців тому +14

      You see, same with Europe during WW2, there was no simple solution, seeing the complexity of the situation there.

    • @PristianoPenaldoSUIIII
      @PristianoPenaldoSUIIII 6 місяців тому +100

      There is a simple solution. We saw it in South Africa a couple of decades ago.

    • @Rampart.X
      @Rampart.X 6 місяців тому +44

      Any claim that there is a solution, is ignorant of the moral consequences of this intractable quagmire.

    • @j.k.6865
      @j.k.6865 6 місяців тому

      @@Rampart.X There is only one solution to fascism. Same treatment they got in Europe during ww2.

  • @noamhochhauser2516
    @noamhochhauser2516 6 місяців тому +30

    Just to correct, HAMAS rule of Gaza wasn't as a consequence of the siege of Gaza (or more accurately the current harsher siege), but rather the opposite it started only in 2007, after in 2006 HAMAS won the elections and in 2007 when HAMAS completely took over executed FATAH officilas.
    It seems more plausible that didn't HAMAS take over because of the siege on Gaza and poverty in the area but rather because of the rise of radical islam all across the middle easy.

    • @inammir1979
      @inammir1979 6 місяців тому

      And also it was funded by Israeli criminal regime dude u cannot just cherry pick that is cheating

    • @dollynina8992
      @dollynina8992 5 місяців тому

      And also because Mossad funded HAMAS

    • @amirgeffen
      @amirgeffen 5 місяців тому

      and funded the isalem to@@dollynina8992​

    • @softdrink-0
      @softdrink-0 14 днів тому

      @@dollynina8992 🐑

    • @dollynina8992
      @dollynina8992 10 днів тому

      @@softdrink-0 It's true. One quick Google search would confirm that. 👍

  • @theawesomeman9821
    @theawesomeman9821 6 місяців тому +369

    It never ceases to amaze me that Israel has survived this long.

    • @farzana6676
      @farzana6676 6 місяців тому +132

      When Uncle Sam is backing you up, you can achieve amazing things. 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸🦅

    • @lightfeather9953
      @lightfeather9953 6 місяців тому

      ​​@@farzana6676that's partially a myth. The USA had little to to do with the 1948 victory for example.
      If USA aid was so magical to victory, govts with much more help like Afghanistan, south Vietnam, etc would have won.
      It's just an intellectually lazy excuse for anything pro USA that happens in the world, basically an anti US propaganda point to blame the USA for affecting everything as if a country with millions of people has no agency, ideals, or abilities of its own.

    • @mitchbaker6300
      @mitchbaker6300 6 місяців тому

      Uncle Sam wasn't there in 48 or 67 though@@farzana6676

    • @MrX-lk3ij
      @MrX-lk3ij 6 місяців тому +142

      ​@@farzana6676Not true. Do you want me to list down a large list of proxy wars where the US was directly or indirectly involved and they lost? Israel stands strong mostly because of the people who live there who know that their existence as a community depends upon the existence of Israel.

    • @farzana6676
      @farzana6676 6 місяців тому +77

      @MrX-lk3ij If America was not giving F35's or F16's to those proxies, then America wasn't really backing them, atleast not comprehensively.
      Like Japan and Korea, Israel is another example of success when America fully commits to a nation's success.

  • @EyobFitwi
    @EyobFitwi 6 місяців тому +706

    And hence, now lays bare the paradoxical dilemma of the country.
    This was an excellent video. I'm really impressed. The maps particularly were of very high quality and greatly helped to visualize and conceptualize the situation.
    Subscribed.

    • @mussajavdan8203
      @mussajavdan8203 6 місяців тому

      Israel will destroy it self with in . They can not go for one state solution without a masscre of 6 miljon people or stablishing an undemocratic faschist Apartheid state like south Africa . Or on the other hand facing war with its neighbour as allways .What a bad place to live . Well its says in the Torat its self ,the jews will be spell and punished for their ungodly actions. Is it not what is going on today or what is you opinion

    • @AlejandroDominguez-jk7cq
      @AlejandroDominguez-jk7cq 6 місяців тому +7

      This channel is absolutely elite. welcome

    • @User-jr7vf
      @User-jr7vf 6 місяців тому +20

      I see a lot of BIAS towards Israel, but for you fans of the channel, everything is fine and aligned.

    • @mussajavdan8203
      @mussajavdan8203 6 місяців тому +27

      @@User-jr7vf This video has some fact issues and is incorrect . The Arab did not start the six day war the Israelis did . There is no mention of Israeli massacre of Palestinian in different stage of war like today

    • @mussajavdan8203
      @mussajavdan8203 6 місяців тому

      @@User-jr7vf Israel will destroy it self with in . They can not go for one state solution without a masscre of 6 miljon people or stablishing an undemocratic faschist Apartheid state like south Africa . Or on the other hand facing war with its neighbour as allways .What a bad place to live . Well its says in the Torat its self ,the jews will be spell and punished for their ungodly actions. Is it not what is going on today or what is you opinion

  • @TheSwedishHistorian
    @TheSwedishHistorian 6 місяців тому +615

    its crazy because it felt like Israel was getting one geopolitical win after another until the bombings from Gaza happened. They were getting official recogniction from more and more countries and notwithstanding some domestic issues they were doing great diplomatically

    • @ffffdddddbb
      @ffffdddddbb 6 місяців тому

      Israel is morally and fiscally complited. To stopping israelis occupation and racism is enough to triggering financial crises in USA and EU. If this countries have finance crise, they can't help israel. Finance situation USA and EU is depending from Saudi Arabien. If tomorrow Saudi stopped oil, israel is not existing. That is why USA(Biden, Blinken) threaten Saudi whit nuclear weapon. But Iran jumps to Saudi side an he threatens USA. Pakistan is also joined to Iran and Saudi.😂😂😂. If tomorrow Nord Korea and Russia joined to the Arab, than....... RIP racist democracy!

    • @williamfarquharson1102
      @williamfarquharson1102 6 місяців тому +213

      It was disintegrating internally due to Netanyahu trying to put an end to an independent judiciary

    • @DarthVantos
      @DarthVantos 6 місяців тому +102

      Israel was doing better, but Netanyahu was not. Iron dome not working properly that oct.7, turret weren't working that day oct.7 and the military consolidated away from the border instead of instantly going to counter the attack. They only sent helicopters to deal with them oct.7-8. Then they went to the border towns.
      This was a perfect storm for Israel to become Fascist dictatorship under Netanyahu that will rule for life.

    • @lilnoir4213
      @lilnoir4213 6 місяців тому

      Those diplomatic achievments were a danger to the goals of Hamas and Iran, thats why they attacked. suffering Palenstinians have always be the justification to kill jews, thats why their arab "brothers" never allowed them to have peace.

    • @BeEmoBro
      @BeEmoBro 6 місяців тому +267

      That's exactly why hamas attacked. to stop the saudi israel peace deal.

  • @evilnet1
    @evilnet1 5 місяців тому +10

    Shirvan’s Analyses are easily some of the most informative and unbiased. Really helped me understand Israel’s motivation and actions. In turn, this has made me appreciate its existence even more.

  • @TRYCLOPS1
    @TRYCLOPS1 6 місяців тому +194

    Also forgot to mention that Israel managed to control the entirety of the Sinai up to the Suez Canal after the 6 day war. But was forced to give it back due to international pressure, mostly from Saudi Arabia which threatened an oil embargo on the US. Huge amount of land they were forced to give back tho they gained Egypt to recognize Israel as a sovereign state.

    • @addounsamiyoucef1999
      @addounsamiyoucef1999 6 місяців тому +30

      They didnt gain shit lol Egypt signed a treaty with usa promising not to invade them 😂

    • @TRYCLOPS1
      @TRYCLOPS1 6 місяців тому +17

      @@addounsamiyoucef1999 and a promise they didn’t even keep 🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️

    • @addounsamiyoucef1999
      @addounsamiyoucef1999 6 місяців тому +27

      @@TRYCLOPS1 they did keep
      them and jordan how do you think Israel is still standing ? The usa is paying them money to protect it

    • @addounsamiyoucef1999
      @addounsamiyoucef1999 6 місяців тому +5

      @@TRYCLOPS1 iran and hamas are the only governments that want that state gone although that might change soon

    • @TRYCLOPS1
      @TRYCLOPS1 6 місяців тому +12

      @@addounsamiyoucef1999 they didn’t. They invaded again in 78, Egypt and Syria.

  • @aashaikh8532
    @aashaikh8532 6 місяців тому +7

    Don't you think it was worth mentioning that in 67 it was israel who attacked egypt and jordan first, and annexed west Bank... ?

    • @jonathanpriel5013
      @jonathanpriel5013 6 місяців тому +8

      Egypt blocked the straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping in 1967 and forced the UN peacekeeping force in Sinai to leave. That was effectively a declaration of war, so Israel preemptively attacked.

    • @aashaikh8532
      @aashaikh8532 6 місяців тому

      @@jonathanpriel5013 ohhh pre emptive strike !
      So if arabs attack it's for no reason... You just ignore the fact of expulsion of Palestinians, blockade and colonisation of their land, and Settler terrorist, and treat it like Arabs attacked for no reason....
      On the contrary if israel attacks, it's justfied preemptive strike and Arabs are to be blamed for this.. this is the level of hypocrisy... 😂 Israel will pay and her demon supporters will cry out of frustration, doesn't matter how long does it take...
      We have the faith, pateint and most importantly the ability to withstand 1000 defeat...

  • @neelarnav7954
    @neelarnav7954 6 місяців тому +36

    This channel is absolutely elite-level. For Geopolitics enthusiasts like me, you are a great dude. PLEASE KEEP GOING AND AS I HAVE ALREADY SUBSCRIBED YOUR CHANNEL ABOUT AN YEAR AGO, I suggest that you post a bit more stuff CaspianReport. It takes time for you to post a video and it is super difficult but still. Great channel no doubt.

  • @larsekman8244
    @larsekman8244 6 місяців тому +166

    Great video. I would just like to add that this conflict punches waaaay above its weight class in terms of the exposure it gets. Many other conflicts, even of religious/ethnic character, are bloodier and have been going on for longer, but gets nowhere near the attention this conflict gets. That has reasons of course, but it's important to remember that it's not materially the most important conflict in the world even though it seems so at times. South Sudan, Yemen/Saudi and Ngorno Karabakh barely gets any airtime compared to when something happens in Israel/Palestine.

    • @laurasecord6586
      @laurasecord6586 6 місяців тому

      Israel is viewed by many in the global south and east (not just Muslims) as West's biggest colonization project. It is a symbol of slavery that many feel they still fight against. For many, it will never compare to any other conflict, and without empathy you will never understand it... so don't try. Many who are dissatisfied with their governments will wrongly or correctly blame American Imperialists for their woes and Israel is a big symbol of that oppression for them. It is a simple story of westerners taking land, but not just any land... A piece of land in the old world (not the Americas, not Australia). It is funny that the land that has caused the almost religious like awakening against western imperialism (aka liberal democratic policies aligned with American interests, I know some of you are allergic to the world imperialism) happens to be the "holy land".

    • @ahmedkamal1240
      @ahmedkamal1240 6 місяців тому +4

      The only reason for that is, unlike other conflicts this conflict is the only one that can lead to a nuclear war or a world war

    • @shamicentertainment1262
      @shamicentertainment1262 6 місяців тому

      @@ahmedkamal1240 the reason for it is because muslims hate israel. no muslims protest the hundreds of thousands dead in syria or yemen. but when 1400 jews are massecred they all come out protesting/celebrating. Maybe you're right about the nuclear thing in regards to other countries, but the muslim world definitely push it into the spotlight because of their hatred of israel

    • @reg-pi1sr
      @reg-pi1sr 6 місяців тому +19

      ​@@ahmedkamal1240
      Lol Nobody expects this would be a nuclear war. Hamas didn't even last a week against Israeli conventional army in that Oct 7 invasion.

    • @jishnujishnu1467
      @jishnujishnu1467 6 місяців тому

      Palestine gets the attention because of how much power and influence Jews have in the US and the west. All those other conflicts involve demographics that, to put it bluntly, no one in the west cares about.

  • @nefaristo
    @nefaristo 6 місяців тому +176

    After this video you really have the sense of "what an unparalleled mess, there's no clear way out or of this", which I think it's quite accurate but very counterintuitive, since we tend to have fast answers and solutions if what's to do especially in politics.

    • @nApucco
      @nApucco 6 місяців тому +28

      In 100 years we will still have this conflict. It is a total mess with no way out.

    • @Razzy_D9111
      @Razzy_D9111 6 місяців тому +13

      I think its quite easy to understand.
      This is geopolitics, what's happening in the practical - material world, is that a humanitarian crisis caused by an unmeasured attack from Israel is occurring in Gaza, whatever comes moving forward is to attend to that and for Israel to face the consequence of their actions, the existence of a state based in such occupation and mistreatment through violence is not progress and should never be seen as a complex issue.

    • @nefaristo
      @nefaristo 6 місяців тому +20

      @@Razzy_D9111 sure then, it's a very simple black and white problem with a straight forward solution🙄
      (The solution is probably 42)

    • @mussajavdan8203
      @mussajavdan8203 6 місяців тому

      Israel will destroy it self with in . They can not go for one state solution without a masscre of 6 miljon people or stablishing an undemocratic faschist Apartheid state like south Africa . Or on the other hand facing war with its neighbour as allways .What a bad place to live . Well its says in the Torat its self ,the jews will be spell and punished for their ungodly actions. Is it not what is going on today or what is you opinion

    • @lif6737
      @lif6737 6 місяців тому +10

      @@Razzy_D9111 Okay, what's your solution to address that?

  • @ekgrulez1
    @ekgrulez1 6 місяців тому +536

    Excellent video explaining Israel's geographical conundrum. Provides a lot more objectivity and unbiased explaining of the situation than any social media or MSM outlet. All I'm seeing on social media is "pro-Palestine" this or "pro-Israel" that. There's no middle ground or objectivity at all on the complex situation.

    • @mussajavdan8203
      @mussajavdan8203 6 місяців тому

      Israel will destroy it self with in . They can not go for one state solution without a masscre of 6 miljon people or stablishing an undemocratic faschist Apartheid state like south Africa . Or on the other hand facing war with its neighbour as allways .What a bad place to live . Well its says in the Torat its self ,the jews will be spell and punished for their ungodly actions. Is it not what is going on today or what is you opinion

    • @mussajavdan8203
      @mussajavdan8203 6 місяців тому

      Israel will destroy it self with in . They can not go for one state solution without a masscre of 6 miljon people or stablishing an undemocratic faschist Apartheid state like south Africa . Or on the other hand facing war with its neighbour as allways .What a bad place to live . Well its says in the Torat its self ,the jews will be spell and punished for their ungodly actions. Is it not what is going on today or what is you opinion

    • @ChineseKiwi
      @ChineseKiwi 6 місяців тому +11

      This and Warographics’ 2 hour video are two of the more objective videos on this complex issue.

    • @Crashed131963
      @Crashed131963 6 місяців тому +36

      Britain should have given the Jewish People "Madagascar" instead .
      Nothing but calm fish as neighbours .

    • @djwestbrook36
      @djwestbrook36 6 місяців тому +125

      This video has a pro-Israeli bent.
      The video acts like Israel got its independence from Britain when it was facilitated by Britain. It doesn't mention the displacement but mentions the Arab nations attacking. In 1967, it makes it seem as the Arabs got together and attacked Israel and it doesn't mention that Israel was the original surprise attacker. This video is certainly biased.

  • @CR-pr4sd
    @CR-pr4sd 6 місяців тому +3

    There is a lot of "If you dont agree with me then you are the bad guy" comments. 😅

  • @LaifuLama
    @LaifuLama 6 місяців тому +36

    So basically this video is saying that for its security, Israel can't give up the lands and territories it occupied from other countries.

    • @Crimea_River
      @Crimea_River 6 місяців тому +30

      *conquered from

    • @Breath.E
      @Breath.E 6 місяців тому +41

      Another false claim. Israel did not occupy land from any "country". In 47 the land (which was British at the time) was divided by the UN between Arabs and Jews. The Jews accepted and the Arabs started a war in which Jordan occupied the west bank (which wasn't given to them by the UN) and Egypt occupied Gaza. Later in 67 Israel took the west bank and Gaza which Jordan and Egypt didn't claim was theirs since. No one claimed that the west bank is "occupied" when the Jordanians occupied it after the 48 war. No "country" ruled the west bank and Gaza accept for the British who left in 47 and Egypt and Jordan which occupied it and gave up on any connection to the land.

    • @Website9
      @Website9 6 місяців тому

      @@Breath.E I can't believe you just stated that Britain owned the Palestinian land in 1947 invaders cannot own land so to then sell it to the highest bidder, like they did with slaves. You people are the reason why the world is in chaos. Very sick people!

    • @Snagprophet
      @Snagprophet 6 місяців тому +1

      It's funny when Arabs start a war against the Jews, lose, and then cries about being oppressed.

    • @KelticStingray
      @KelticStingray 6 місяців тому +23

      Conquered just like peaceful Muslims conquered and displaced before them. Hypocrites all.

  • @Channelterror117
    @Channelterror117 6 місяців тому +189

    Love the poetry you always sprinkle through the script, adds lots of value.

    • @wendten2
      @wendten2 6 місяців тому +9

      agree.. especially since shirwan isnt a native english speaker

    • @phlezktravels
      @phlezktravels 6 місяців тому +4

      It helps the propaganda

    • @ArawnOfAnnwn
      @ArawnOfAnnwn 6 місяців тому +1

      @@wendten2 A lot of those quotable quotes aren't his. They're sayings of other people that he fails to give attribution for.

    • @wendten2
      @wendten2 6 місяців тому +1

      @@ArawnOfAnnwn Non of them are his, but the way he know when and where to use them surely is poetic craftmanship. And no you dont have to give attribution to long dead people...

    • @ArawnOfAnnwn
      @ArawnOfAnnwn 6 місяців тому +2

      @@wendten2 "you don't have to give attribution to long dead people" - I disagree. Not giving attribution allows others to just pass off their wit or wisdom as their own. This misleads people about the intellect they think they're listening to. Every video of his has people praising him for his one-liners as if he came up with them. Some of those people won't know he didn't, and mistakenly think he's cleverer than he is.

  • @historyking9984
    @historyking9984 6 місяців тому +141

    Thank you. So many people just ignore the geopolitical situation and just see the Palestinian Israel conflict without the surrounding geopolitical issues and factors involved

    • @ekgrulez1
      @ekgrulez1 6 місяців тому +19

      There’s so many comments online that will say that it’s the Israelis who are the aggressor and Palestinians who are the suffering victims. I’m not taking sides of that discussion; this video is simply explaining Israel’s geopolitical issues that it’s facing while at the same time not defending the actions of both the Israelis or Hamas.

    • @himanshugurjar9002
      @himanshugurjar9002 6 місяців тому +5

      ​@@ekgrulez1All critical race theory stuff is useless

    • @kingace6186
      @kingace6186 6 місяців тому +10

      He ignored a lot of the other surrounding issues and factors for the sake of his analysis...

    • @Silent_Steel
      @Silent_Steel 6 місяців тому +8

      ​@@kingace6186he just simplified it the best he could... and did a damn good job... if he covered every little detail the video would've been way too long and no one would watch it...

    • @sammalama
      @sammalama 6 місяців тому

      @@ekgrulez1 Oh I wonder why Israel is so hated and has so many enemies in their "own neighborhood".

  • @BonkoTheFat
    @BonkoTheFat 6 місяців тому +32

    What a fantastic video Shirvan. I came away from this with a much better understanding of what is going into Israel's decision making.

    • @knowledgeringsstalkers1795
      @knowledgeringsstalkers1795 6 місяців тому

      15:12 😂😂 LOL Palestinians loyal to the ISREALI State what useless research you have done. No one in theory and practicality believe that Palestinians to be loyal to isreal. Your views are totally biased and absolutely supporting to Palestine nevertheless you stating to use ground report.
      You are a Muslim radical supporter your solidarity is with Muslim and Islam only this have been shown in many videos of your supporting Palestine being Muslim majority against isreali. Same you had done with supporting Islamic republic of Pakistan over India.
      Why don't you have guts to criticize china.
      16-11-2023

  • @billc.4584
    @billc.4584 6 місяців тому +19

    As always, an amazingly comprehensive and neutral toned overview. Thanks.

    • @mohamadjouzou4995
      @mohamadjouzou4995 6 місяців тому +2

      Neutral?😂😂😂

    • @Rubicon1
      @Rubicon1 6 місяців тому

      Its not really neutral.... its sneakily pro Israel as Azerbaijan, the channels origin, is pro Israel with a large number Jews living there. Israel uses Azerbaijan to threaten Iran Militarily and undermine Iranian trading routes . Iran threatens Israel militarily using the Hezbollah in Lebanon.

  • @buster349100
    @buster349100 6 місяців тому +4

    Thank you! This has made the current situation somewhat more understandable.

  • @johngeren1053
    @johngeren1053 6 місяців тому +35

    If we are comparing Israel's geography to simple mechanical devices, then it resembles a wedge rather than a linchpin. Strategically it is also a wedge that divides the Arab world. Given rhat Winston Churchill - the main architect of the post-Ottoman Middle East - said that he wanted it to become " an empire on the cheap" governed by the principle of "divide and rule", the wedge comparison sewms apt. Linchpins unite. Wedges break apart

    • @whartanto2
      @whartanto2 6 місяців тому

      Israel is America's unsinkable aircraft carrier in the Middle East, just like Taiwan is against China.
      But with the Muslim population in America growing faster than ever (1% for Muslims vs 2% for Jews), you will start seeing a generational shift from the traditional unconditional support for Israel to a more balanced split.
      A little bit simplistic hyperbole here but the Democrats will always pretend to support the underdogs while promoting the interests of the elites; while the Republicans will always pretend to support Israel, mostly because they love the Jewish space lasers that cause the Californian wildfire... It's funny that the biggest zionist supporters on the far right are also anti-semitic, probably they think that if Israel does not exist, there will be 9 million more Jews in America.

    • @Praisethesunson
      @Praisethesunson 6 місяців тому +9

      The Brits are the best at using arbitrary differences as pretense for land seizure.

    • @johngeren1053
      @johngeren1053 6 місяців тому +8

      The French helped out on this one. My country - US - has managed to combine all of the worst strategies of both Britain and France during this century.in the ME.

    • @kingace6186
      @kingace6186 6 місяців тому

      True.

  • @shlomomarkman6374
    @shlomomarkman6374 6 місяців тому +166

    Israeli policy wasn't a two state nor a one state solution but a 1.5 state solution, at least until October the 7th.
    The strategic thought about that was that if the Gaza strip becomes a separate entity, it's population wouldn't count in any settlement. The birth rate in the west bank is on the decline for two decades (unlike Gaza) so it's deemed manageable and can be accommodated by some autonomous entity as was described in the Trump plan.
    The demographic difference between Gaza and the west bank stems from their different economics. The west bank needs to take care for itself as relatively few are eligible for UN aid. The trend of urbanisation caused a decrease in fertility as is the rule everywhere in the world (children in urban environment are a drain instead of an asset and even in the villages, mechanisation cause children to be less of an asset). In Gaza, most of the population are eligible for food aid so somebody else takes care of their children. This enables them to have more despite half of them not working.

    • @vaclavdockal6272
      @vaclavdockal6272 6 місяців тому

      Essentialy it is UN do-gooders and their welfare in Gaza perpetuating the problem by allowing governing power in Gaza(Hamas) to not take care about the statehood and its people and focus on ideology and destruction. Also why not have 8 kids when UN will feed them anyway.

    • @googane7755
      @googane7755 6 місяців тому +46

      Or like all throughout history, people tend to have more kids the poorer they are especially when an apartheid state is actively trying to ethnically cleanse them.

    • @vaclavdockal6272
      @vaclavdockal6272 6 місяців тому +71

      @@googane7755 thing is Gaza wasn't occupied since 2005, so you can't claim it's the "apartheid state" there. That logic would be applicable to West Bank, but it doesn't seem to play out there either.

    • @grandayatollah5655
      @grandayatollah5655 6 місяців тому +38

      ​@@vaclavdockal6272just an open air prison

    • @miltonmiles6324
      @miltonmiles6324 6 місяців тому

      @@vaclavdockal6272what a fucking load of hasbara bollocks. israel controls gaza’s borders, sea and air. water and electricity is controlled by israel. and you don’t call it an occupation?

  • @obakengafrica2919
    @obakengafrica2919 6 місяців тому +4

    Your channel is the best geopolitics outlet on this platform. You do really good work.

  • @citezensane4413
    @citezensane4413 6 місяців тому +22

    One of your best. Super informative. Learned nuances of the situation I never heard before. The maps helped a ton

  • @Mercier1979Velo
    @Mercier1979Velo 6 місяців тому +36

    A few remarks clarifying how the Arab nations use/abuse Palestinians to ram Israel while playing it pure and just and superficially backing them:
    1. The neighboring Arab countries never viewed the Palestinians as sovereign people. Egypt and Syria conspired to unite into one Sunni state that would spread across Israel as well as Lebanon and Jordan without the consent of the Palestinians or the latter two.
    2. The 1948 independence war that was forced upon Israel drove the Palestinians from their lands rather than Israel which is always blamed for it. Arabs who stayed in Israel are equal Israeli citizens (2 million out of total of 9.5million citizens in Israel).
    3. Egypt never agreed to take Gaza along with Sinai when Israel returned it to them for the peace agreements, as they knew the kind of population it had and its affinity to extremist Islam like the 'Islamic brothers' of Egypt.
    4. Jordan which annexed the West Bank finally butchered the Palestinians and drove them to refugee camps in Lebanon in 1970-1 'Black September' since they were afraid of the strength the terror organizations gained with the backing of Syria.

    • @dnyalslg
      @dnyalslg 6 місяців тому +1

      The Israeli definition of “equal citizens” is basically “equal but separate.” A justification along the lines of “look, not even your own brothers respect you, so I don’t have to” is quite telling of the Zionist mindset. No wonder the country imposes apartheid on Palestinians.

    • @Mercier1979Velo
      @Mercier1979Velo 6 місяців тому

      @@dnyalslg Normally I wouldn't dignify your lies with an answer but for the edification of other viewers:
      1. The Israeli Arab citizens are fully EQUAL in their rights. I, as a Jew, can be prosecuted by an Arab attorney, Judged by an Arab Judge, or alternatively taken care of medically by an Arab Doctor or Nurse. Some of my teachers and many coworkers in hi-tech companies were Arab citizens.
      2. Palestinians are living on their own land, governed by their own government. There is no apartheid since THEY ARE NOT CITIZENS of Israel and do not live inside Israel. There is a big difference between Israeli Arabs and Palestinians. The latter are not Israeli citizens or residents.
      Keep lying. That's what makes your soul so pretty!!

    • @harpagornis
      @harpagornis 6 місяців тому +1

      I had to look this up. Egypt and Syria did attempt to become one state in 1958. The union was called the United Arab Republic (UAR) and it was led by Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser. Thanks for the information!

    • @Mercier1979Velo
      @Mercier1979Velo 6 місяців тому

      Glad to be of service :) @harpagornis

    • @kingace6186
      @kingace6186 6 місяців тому

      Straight propaganda and misinformation.
      1. The Arab Nations might have had ulterior motives but they were the only allies that Palestinians could count on. A stark reality that the Jewish & British colonials forced upon them.
      2. Israel provoked the 1948 war by committing the Nakba/the Palestinian Holocaust. Palestinians were betrayed and ethnically cleansed by Jewish neighbors. Arabs only invaded to stop the Nakba and saw Israel as more European colonization.
      3. Egypt didn't take Gaza back because it wanted Gaza to belong to Palestine. Egypt was in no shape to annex new lands.
      4. Jordan lost the West Bank before the war. The Jordanian-PLO war is always used by Israel to defame Palestinians everywhere. But they never mention that the Palestinians fled to Jordan and were radicalized *because of the colonization of Israel*. If you can someone's family and steal their home and make them homeless, of course, you would expect that person to be radicalized.

  • @ahmadumeta4
    @ahmadumeta4 6 місяців тому +182

    This issue gets more complex the more I delve into it

    • @ronnynoneofyourbusinessgoo7892
      @ronnynoneofyourbusinessgoo7892 6 місяців тому +55

      Mate, this is clearly Israeli-sponsored PR here.

    • @ntluck1592
      @ntluck1592 6 місяців тому +61

      @@ronnynoneofyourbusinessgoo7892 Yeah, I have never seen such blatant hypocrisy before. Caspian has always been biased towards Israel, and considering how Israel has been caught soliciting many youtubers for shit like that, it has seriously made me lose my trust in him

    • @utuberme1
      @utuberme1 6 місяців тому +86

      @@ntluck1592 Can you expound a little more; As in what specific hypocrisies were presented in this video?

    • @carlosandleon
      @carlosandleon 6 місяців тому

      @@utuberme1there is no hypocrisy in geopolitics. Deception is a tool of leverage and warfare. The Arabs and the Israelis use it freely.

    • @user-tz4nm4qd7g
      @user-tz4nm4qd7g 6 місяців тому +19

      ​@@ntluck1592you are so Spam.
      U can come any time to Israel. When u want to the reality conflict in first view. We welcome you at Ben gurion airport 😊

  • @curtishoke
    @curtishoke 6 місяців тому +19

    I learned so much from this video. It's crazy that we never really learn about both sides in the US and are left to wonder "why no two-state solution yet?"

    • @puraLusa
      @puraLusa 6 місяців тому

      Maybe the problem is lack of homework 😂

  • @ryankwan1934
    @ryankwan1934 4 місяці тому +2

    "Punches above its weight in Statescraft". Largest recipient of US aid and has unconditional support from the world's empire. Yeah....

  • @JIMA-Club
    @JIMA-Club 6 місяців тому +97

    Best presentation I've seen, because it explains a point that should be better understood by many discussing Israeli conflicts: Israeli foreign policy is just a continuation of military tactics.

    • @Ilamarea
      @Ilamarea 6 місяців тому +8

      You mean Israel is a Nation State? xD

    • @guidobolke5618
      @guidobolke5618 6 місяців тому +26

      You mean politics is war by other means ? :-)

    • @JIMA-Club
      @JIMA-Club 6 місяців тому +3

      @@guidobolke5618 Exactly lol

    • @mohammedkassim7658
      @mohammedkassim7658 6 місяців тому

      Exactly 💯

    • @HailStonE999
      @HailStonE999 6 місяців тому

      But it's expensive & cannot go on forever... It's a bad military strategy to keep occupation forever... Right now Uncle Sam, Evangelicals & Zionists are picking the bill. If the economy which is fragile right now is affected & that money stream dries off then it will be very expensive for Israel to continue it's occupation....

  • @yosefshechter6322
    @yosefshechter6322 6 місяців тому +87

    You forgot to mention that Israel left Gaza in 2005, you forgot to mention that Israel really wanted to give Gaza to Egypt in the peace agreement But Egypt flatly refused

    • @Dsaes
      @Dsaes 6 місяців тому +2

      All Arab country refuse that . are you going to create new crisis Nakba !!

    • @umaryusuf537
      @umaryusuf537 6 місяців тому

      No they didn’t Gaza was entirely controlled by Israel acess into and outside, Gazas airspace, water acess, food electricity water everything Gaza was never given freedom it was just walled up and turned into a ghetto

    • @HailStonE999
      @HailStonE999 6 місяців тому

      Giving Gaza back was a strategic Israeli ploy to freeze the peace process & tell the world they tried negotiating with Palestinians... This was a show of their intention to a solution but in reality they wanted to block Gaza completely like a prison that it really is right now.... This confining a large chunk of Palestinian population in a locked area was easier for them to control....

  • @TheSpiritof76
    @TheSpiritof76 6 місяців тому +13

    So many mad Muslims and tankies in the comments 😂
    Thank you for the wonderful video as always Shirvan!

  • @mr555harv
    @mr555harv 6 місяців тому +5

    An excellent summary, and I have seen many. Keep up the good work.

  • @saslav1980
    @saslav1980 6 місяців тому +16

    12:12 You said Gaza holds little strategic value so it server as a place Of poverty and neglect, There leaders could have turned Gaza into top destination Mediterranean resort in Middle East. Instead their leaders live in 5 star resort out side Gaza and the people suffering.

    • @alraziosmany
      @alraziosmany 6 місяців тому

      sirvan is just whitewashing Israels warcrimes

    • @aq4356
      @aq4356 6 місяців тому +3

      Gaza literally has a gas field off its coast, it most certainly has value. CaspianReport is clueless.

    • @talknight2
      @talknight2 6 місяців тому

      @@aq4356They're accessible from Israeli ports just north of Gaza

  • @death2cake
    @death2cake 6 місяців тому +8

    this is the best video ive seen on this topic and ive been following it for 25+ years.

  • @untouchable360x
    @untouchable360x 6 місяців тому +1

    "Keep your enemies close." Whoever said this didn't have many enemies.

  • @Alhamdlh
    @Alhamdlh 4 місяці тому +3

    For those calling Hamas a terrorist group! How can you justify Israel to occupy all this land due to the threat of attack they face! What about the Palestinians denied rights to their land and Israel continues to expand and annex more land!
    Well, Two State isn’t possible according to Israel, it’s sad this conflict is trapped and May the rightful owners win.

  • @nabeehalharbi
    @nabeehalharbi 6 місяців тому +4

    If the surrounding is hostile that is mean you dont beloing to that area

    • @holyX
      @holyX 6 місяців тому +1

      ​@@Icarus7c04 Arabs are cowardly losers and we shall prevail. We are smarter and kinder 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱

  • @ChickenVeggi
    @ChickenVeggi 6 місяців тому +19

    There is a problem with settlements argument. While from the Israeli perspective building settlements for security may have made sense pre Oslo accords because they were being threatened existentially from all sides. They didn’t make sense after that. Arab by the late 90s recognised they are not capable of wiping out the Israeli state and have to coexist. So building settlements actually made security situation worse because it increased grievance and resistance among Palestinians. This resulted in 2nd intifada and increased support for extremists like the Hamas. Even Israel recognised that. That’s why they exited Gaza and broke the settlements in there. But because they did it without negotiation, the PLO lost legitimacy and instead Hamas instead was able make the case that only violence can save the Palestinians. If the problem for Israel was that Palestinians hate them, they made the situation worse by building more settlements as now Palestinians hate them even more. Most Palestinians don’t have intrinsic hatred towards Jews. Even in mid 2000s during the 2nd intifada most supported negotiation. In your videos you make it seem like peace between Israel and its neighbours is not possible and thus they have to conquer territories to secure themself. But even Israel knows that is not true. You pointed out how the Sinai desert can be used to threaten Israel but you failed to mention they once conquered the territories during the Yom Kappur War. Under this videos logic keeping the territory would have been great for strategic depth and security. But they knew if they kept the territory Egypt would have grievance and try to attack them again. That’s why they negotiated and gave the territory back in return for recognition and security. Even other Arab wants to cooperate and thus the Abram’s accord went through. They did by trying to ignore the Palestinian question and settlements. But now with the hamas the Palestinian problem has come to everyone’s attention. Saudi Arabia which tried to normalise relations cannot do it until the settlements problem has been solved.
    Speaking about Hamas attack, even Israelis recognise settlements are a security threat to them. Netenyahu is unpopular despite being a wartime leader because he focused so much on the settlements, Hamas was able to invade southern Israel and kill and kidnap Israelis. IDF was late in responding. Even if you talk about Iran funding terror organisation, they wouldn’t have the support required, if the Palestinians didn’t have grievances against Israelis for building settlements.

    • @sriig
      @sriig 6 місяців тому +1

      My hot take is that…if the choice between peace with the Saudis and Emiratis, or defending the illegal settlements…Washington will pressure Israel to throw the settlers overboard.
      And not only that. An end to the settlements might even bring the Qatari’s to the table. In which case it’s curtains for the settlements. Tel Aviv will take that deal because Washington will make them

    • @user-bz6ov5nx5v
      @user-bz6ov5nx5v 6 місяців тому +6

      Well, quite the opposite. The Oslo accords brought Yasser Arafat from exile to rule over the Palestinians in exchange for peace.
      Yasser Arafat didn't hold the Oslo agreement one bit. He smuggled weapons in his car on his very arrival to the west bank. He did not mean peace, only Taki'a, which means to fool your enemy with a feigned peace agreement when you're weak only to attack him by surprise when you're strong enough.
      The situation for Israelis deteriorated drastically after the Oslo accords because of the terror that Arafat brought with him, not the settlements. This is just an illusion.
      The failure of Oslo is a stark reminder for all Israelis why they should never trust the nice words of the Arabs, ond only negitiate from a position of power.

    • @talknight2
      @talknight2 6 місяців тому

      The problem with the settlements nowadays is... you're talking about evicting almost 10% of the Jewish population of the country out of their homes. Complete abandonment of the settlements could actually start a civil war. The numbers here are approaching those of the Palestinian refugees back in 1948.

    • @archyarchfiendx2938
      @archyarchfiendx2938 6 місяців тому

      Any war with Israel is purely from Islamic inspired antisemitism nothing more nothing less. The Palestinians say it themselves. Iran says the same thing they don’t care for peace they only want the obliteration of the Jewish people.

    • @ibtissempharm8800
      @ibtissempharm8800 6 місяців тому

      ​@@user-bz6ov5nx5vwhat a beautiful life and bright future await the people who share your opinion and vision. The probability of isreal being completely wiped out is higher if things continue like this and escalate, suit yourself.

  • @DoodiePunk
    @DoodiePunk 6 місяців тому +2

    It was a mistake leaving Sinai.

  • @YujiroHanmaaaa
    @YujiroHanmaaaa 6 місяців тому +11

    BIggest mistake Israel did, was to let go Egypt's Sinai Desert territory

    • @qwerty-vp1sb
      @qwerty-vp1sb 6 місяців тому

      yeah, its a big advantage for them having that big buffer zone between egypt a country of 100+ million.. i wonder why they give that up but only keep golan heights

    • @livemealone4247
      @livemealone4247 6 місяців тому +1

      ​@@qwerty-vp1sb american pressures

    • @yakov95000
      @yakov95000 6 місяців тому +4

      People don't talk about it but very very big reason for this peace was actually international pressure,Israel after 67 was boycotted massively,kicked out from many Asian organizations,suffered total oil Embargo and economic stagnation,Suez was entirely closed until 73 and there was IMMENSE pressure from the world to Israel to retreat,Sadat really did a checkmate where he expressed his willingness publicly and came to Israel while demanding ALL of Sinai,Israel in that couldn't even keep Yamit or Taba which considered "part of Israel" in that time.

    • @livemealone4247
      @livemealone4247 6 місяців тому +1

      @@yakov95000 it's was because the Americans the only 1 country who israel can trust her

  • @buzzyinurface
    @buzzyinurface 6 місяців тому +22

    The level of education I receive from these extremely high quality videos is simply astonishing. I love it!

    • @abody499
      @abody499 6 місяців тому

      how do you know?

    • @ibtissempharm8800
      @ibtissempharm8800 6 місяців тому

      I wouldn't say this is an objective analysis of the situation but more like a justification for all the out of law, immoral deeds of isreal by portraying it as this victim nation just trying to survive in this 'hostile for no reason' neighborhood. I advice you look at other more unbiased balanced sources, if you don't at least listen to both sides and make your own conclusions.

    • @demianperez1182
      @demianperez1182 6 місяців тому +1

      @@abody499 can people like u just accept that some just wanna be neutral

    • @abody499
      @abody499 6 місяців тому

      ​ @demianperez1182 wat

  • @acephalica
    @acephalica 6 місяців тому +30

    Great explanation about the strategic security from the point of view of Israel...

    • @Alex_Gabuya
      @Alex_Gabuya 6 місяців тому +13

      I can't believe some are calling this 'unbiased'

    • @mussajavdan8203
      @mussajavdan8203 6 місяців тому

      Israel will destroy it self with in . They can not go for one state solution without a masscre of 6 miljon people or stablishing an undemocratic faschist Apartheid state like south Africa . Or on the other hand facing war with its neighbour as allways .What a bad place to live . Well its says in the Torat its self ,the jews will be spell and punished for their ungodly actions. Is it not what is going on today or what is you opinion

    • @XSuperRedBullX
      @XSuperRedBullX 6 місяців тому +4

      @@Alex_Gabuyabots

    • @aq4356
      @aq4356 6 місяців тому +5

      ​@@XSuperRedBullX you can tell theyre bots or people acting like bots when they all keep repeating the same word: "complex"

    • @vulpo
      @vulpo 6 місяців тому +4

      @@Alex_Gabuya Shirvan knows on which side his bread is buttered.

  • @robobrain10000
    @robobrain10000 6 місяців тому +1

    Genuine question, why is the Israeli occupation of those strategic spots internationally illegal? They were invaded and then pushed the invaders back and won the strategic territory in the process. How is that illegal?

  • @b3nisrael
    @b3nisrael 6 місяців тому +4

    Wonderful analysis! Caspian never disappoints.

  • @jayre2089
    @jayre2089 6 місяців тому +9

    Nice work. His videos are always informative and explanatory.

  • @justalonesoul5825
    @justalonesoul5825 6 місяців тому +5

    I had never ssen the situation from this precise point of view and that was simply interesting AF. TYVM and very well done. There is no bias, it's just presenting a particular point of view, very important to understand better the depth of the whole imbroglio...

  • @reallyhappenings5597
    @reallyhappenings5597 6 місяців тому +1

    They made a deal with the devil in 1948, and he does not forgive his contracts. The price? Eternal fear and alienation.

  • @Bay0Wulf
    @Bay0Wulf 6 місяців тому +5

    Well, I appreciate that you make distinctions between the various “Arab Nations” and try to treat each as a separate entity.
    However, that rhetoric “From the River to the Sea” IS NOT an Arab “Nation” idea … it is an Islamic/Muslim Theocratic POLICY (Mandate) … in fact, it is a Tiny Step toward Their Mandate to Force the Entire World to Submit to Islam … by ANY MEANS Necessary but especially through Violence and Intimidation (Jihad) …
    Israel simply happens to be seen as the Smallest, Nearest, Most Vulnerable Target and … according to Islam … the Most Persistent Enemy to Tgeir Cause.

  • @oe5580
    @oe5580 6 місяців тому +44

    The biggest problem is if territories of states are not connected and split by another state’s territory. Similar to the Armenia and Azerbaijan conflict.
    In the Gaza situation it’s even worse because of the tremendous high population. It’s not like it would be possible to re locate the people… in the Armenian Azerbaijani conflict it would be theoretically possible to get clear separated borders…. Not saying what Azerbaijan did is justifiable…
    Just wanted to point out the geographical aspects that are often factors or reasons in such wars/conflicts. I know that to the Israeli Palestinian conflict way more factors need to be considered but for a long term peace agreement between both parties and a 2 state solution Gaza being cut off to the rest of the world would lead again to another conflict sooner or later regardless of whatever Israel does now militarily.

    • @mussajavdan8203
      @mussajavdan8203 6 місяців тому

      Israel will destroy it self with in . They can not go for one state solution without a masscre of 6 miljon people or stablishing an undemocratic faschist Apartheid state like south Africa . Or on the other hand facing war with its neighbour as allways .What a bad place to live . Well its says in the Torat its self ,the jews will be spell and punished for their ungodly actions. Is it not what is going on today or what is you opinion

    • @vulpo
      @vulpo 6 місяців тому +20

      A one-state solution, "from the river to the sea," would be ideal - think of a secular Republic of the Levant. However, racial hatred, religious agendas, and deep-rooted distrust on both sides make that impossible. Too bad they can't all just get along, live and let live. It could be a beautiful, happy, and prosperous nation for all, but instead it is eternally cursed with violence, enmity, and death.

    • @mussajavdan8203
      @mussajavdan8203 6 місяців тому +1

      @@vulpo yes it could really

    • @donaldseigel4101
      @donaldseigel4101 6 місяців тому +4

      Gaza has the sea, and a border with Egypt, so it is not necessarily cut off from the rest of the world (or wasnt until Hamas took over).

    • @kingace6186
      @kingace6186 6 місяців тому +1

      Half of all Palestinians in Palestine live in the Gaza Strip alone.

  • @najaziz08
    @najaziz08 6 місяців тому +4

    Excellent presentation as always - learnt a lot. Thank you

  • @Thenoobestgirl
    @Thenoobestgirl 5 місяців тому +4

    Fantastic breakdown!

  • @rigelbound6749
    @rigelbound6749 6 місяців тому +4

    Excellent analysis. Subscribed

  • @maxidaho
    @maxidaho 6 місяців тому +9

    I'm impressed by your ability to navigate around the political land mines inherent in this story and conflict.

    • @sambingham1196
      @sambingham1196 6 місяців тому +6

      Haha, if you pay attention, this video definitely has a pro-Israel tint.

    • @ybh8inify
      @ybh8inify 6 місяців тому +5

      @@sambingham1196 it's not even subtle tbh

    • @halinaqi2194
      @halinaqi2194 6 місяців тому +5

      @@ybh8inify "Guys as you can see, Israel has no choice but to occupy the golan heights! They have no choice but siege gaza and maintain military occupation of the west bank! its all for their safety because the arab nations are looking for any chance to wipe them off the map..." It is so pro Israel that it had to, no MUST, ignore all historical context as to why the arab nations didnt like Israel back then and why they couldnt accept a nation on their doorstep.

    • @N0xiety
      @N0xiety 6 місяців тому

      @@halinaqi2194 So are you saying all that said is wrong? Does Israel have a choice, do tell? Would arab nations not take any chance to wipe them off the map if they smelled weakness? Whatever the historical context may be, are you saying all that is incorrect at the end of the day?
      Oh wait right, Israel does have choices from your point of view. Like so many other commenters of your sort seem to love to demand, just vacate the land, basically millions of people fck off to wherever, who cares ey? Or just stop fighting at all and willingly take steps to getting eradicated as they have 'no rights' anyways, that seems to be the reasonable and realistic 'choices' Israel has for you people.

    • @circuitbreaker8314
      @circuitbreaker8314 6 місяців тому

      He probably got paid by israel

  • @bez1196
    @bez1196 6 місяців тому +21

    Above its weight? With full US support.

    • @user-gr9fq9gt9w
      @user-gr9fq9gt9w 6 місяців тому +2

      The US supports way more than their other allies. Not a single US soldier ever stationed in Israel, for instance. (Well, there is only that new American radar, mainly for American use).
      Not to mention that until 1973, it had barely any support at all, from all over the globe. Maybe except Czechoslovakia and a little from France.

    • @user-op8fg3ny3j
      @user-op8fg3ny3j 6 місяців тому

      @@Icarus7c04 yes, before the US, the UK was the world superpower

    • @sergeedelstein3463
      @sergeedelstein3463 6 місяців тому

      @@user-gr9fq9gt9w what are you talking about?
      I personally trained with us marines at IDF(we riped them apart by the way). USA pilots are here all the time.

    • @user-gr9fq9gt9w
      @user-gr9fq9gt9w 6 місяців тому

      @@sergeedelstein3463
      Not defending Israel. Unlike others. There's no American base.

  • @iEatCheese33
    @iEatCheese33 6 місяців тому +32

    This was so informal it should be showed to everyone interested in the topic.

    • @AdmiralHipper15
      @AdmiralHipper15 6 місяців тому +11

      I think you mean informational?

    • @ibtissempharm8800
      @ibtissempharm8800 6 місяців тому

      I wouldn't say this is an objective analysis of the situation but more like a justification for all the out of law, immoral deeds of isreal by portraying it as this victim nation just trying to survive in this 'hostile for no reason' neighborhood. I advice you look at other more unbiased balanced sources, if you don't at least listen to both sides and make your own conclusions.

  • @ThereIsOnlyWar40k
    @ThereIsOnlyWar40k 6 місяців тому +1

    Good man Caspian. The best summary of the conflict there is.

  • @ImperiousLeader71
    @ImperiousLeader71 6 місяців тому +44

    my favorite Caspian video to date. well done!

    • @ahmvedakeel
      @ahmvedakeel 6 місяців тому +7

      yeah super biased in favor of israel

    • @demianperez1182
      @demianperez1182 6 місяців тому +1

      @@ahmvedakeel bro u people just don't wanna accept that some people wanna be neutral🤣🤣🤣

  • @Urliamo
    @Urliamo 6 місяців тому +4

    @16:08
    this is probably the most important factor people need to learn about this conflict.
    it's actually fueled by fuel - not hate. hate is just a tool.

  • @joeyfitz9
    @joeyfitz9 5 місяців тому +2

    @ 4:04 "The lay of the land shapes the hand that rules."
    Brilliant!

  • @ashishsachdeva432
    @ashishsachdeva432 6 місяців тому +1

    Wonderful video. Explains the nuances clearly.

  • @gpsfeir
    @gpsfeir 6 місяців тому +25

    'the Israelis have nowhere to go do they might as well put up a fight'... Isn't that ironic huh?

    • @arnonshelant6247
      @arnonshelant6247 6 місяців тому +19

      1 Jewish state vs 49 Muslim states. Who has alternatives? The Israelis or the Palestinians?

    • @saffsuff
      @saffsuff 6 місяців тому +13

      Hahah exactly...the same thing could be said about a piece of land with 2.5 million people in an open air prison for 17 years aka Gaza

    • @TheRealBigPlayas
      @TheRealBigPlayas 6 місяців тому

      @@saffsuff Then ya shouldnt vote for terrorists to be in power ;)

    • @TheIspretzZz
      @TheIspretzZz 6 місяців тому +9

      And if it’s Palestinians they will be called anti-semites or terrors.

    • @mussajavdan8203
      @mussajavdan8203 6 місяців тому

      Israel will destroy it self with in . They can not go for one state solution without a masscre of 6 miljon people or stablishing an undemocratic faschist Apartheid state like south Africa . Or on the other hand facing war with its neighbour as allways .What a bad place to live . Well its says in the Torat its self ,the jews will be spell and punished for their ungodly actions. Is it not what is going on today or what is you opinion

  • @nyekorare
    @nyekorare 6 місяців тому +3

    This is what Baldwin II of Jerusalem feels

  • @Landserfaust1
    @Landserfaust1 6 місяців тому +13

    In 1967 it was Israel that surprised attacked the arab countries pre emptively the Egyptian and Syrians were in no posture to initiate an attack as the Egyptian airforce was wiped out in the beginning of the war. As for the rest, I liked the analysis, it reflects the thoughts of Tim Marshall in Prisoners of geography.

    • @starstencahl8985
      @starstencahl8985 6 місяців тому +16

      Yes, because they blocked the Straits of Tiran for Israeli ships multiple times, blocking Israels natural access to Red Sea and even after being warned to do so again would result in a war, blocked the Straits of Tiran for Israeli ships yet again. Obviously, this resulted in said war. It's honestly almost comedic how these countries LOVE to play the victim role

    • @Landserfaust1
      @Landserfaust1 6 місяців тому +2

      In the video if you notice it says that the arab armies attacked I was merely pointing that out. There was no attack from the arab armies. Also blocking the straits of Tiran is not an invitation to invade 3 separate countries. Diplomacy should have been used and abused, war is not the solution that is why Israel is still sitting on the same problem so many years after said conflicts

    • @BenyKarachun
      @BenyKarachun 6 місяців тому +2

      @@Landserfaust1 Israel attacked only Egypt initially, Syria, Jordan and the rest attacked Israel as a result.

    • @ken25prp06
      @ken25prp06 6 місяців тому

      You should also mention that egypt, syria and jordan have been doing millitary excercises on the israeli border for weeks before the war. And that the israeli military also got information for an imminant attack

    • @mabhodlelajj1195
      @mabhodlelajj1195 5 місяців тому +1

      Imagin you mobilise your armies and march to another country's borders threatening to invade, then claim you were caught by surprise when the country you mobilised armies against strike🙄

  • @garyandrews5104
    @garyandrews5104 6 місяців тому +31

    Excellent explanation of what Israel is facing. So many people do not understand the full story, but more worrying, they do not wish to understand. Video’s like these could go a long way if people wish to understand.

    • @ekgrulez1
      @ekgrulez1 6 місяців тому +2

      I'm getting a lot of folks replying to my comment post, saying how biased this video is. They only think of Israel as an aggressor, which in many ways I can't disagree with them. But they don't understand the complexities of what Israel faces. They only think in a one sided perspective.

    • @ivessandiego1545
      @ivessandiego1545 6 місяців тому +1

      Understand what? They chose to create a country within another and are victims of their surroundings?

    • @NaCk210
      @NaCk210 6 місяців тому +3

      Just because the situation they got themselves in is complicated doesn't mean their actions are morally good.

    • @garyandrews5104
      @garyandrews5104 6 місяців тому +2

      @@NaCk210 they are not perfect… nobody is… however, they are far superior to those wanting their total destruction….

    • @alexamorris8411
      @alexamorris8411 6 місяців тому

      ​@@NaCk210I wouldn't call a fight for survival as morally good, but I wouldn't consider it morally reprehensible either.

  • @Curtisgoesplaces
    @Curtisgoesplaces 6 місяців тому +32

    Great stuff as always my guy! I’m a high school history teacher and I learn a lot from your videos that I pepper-in throughout my lessons. 🤘

    • @EarthAngel504
      @EarthAngel504 6 місяців тому +1

      A history teacher Great. here's something you can look up. A quote from Gamal Abdel Nasser, the President of Egypt in 1956 in regards to the Newly created state of Israel;
      -“You will never be able to live here in peace, because you left here black and came back white”
      Why do you think a President would say such a thing to a newly created State, and say it before the whole world?

    • @ayaobaid4402
      @ayaobaid4402 6 місяців тому

      As a teacher, you should probably study the sources directly.

  • @patrickcloutier6801
    @patrickcloutier6801 6 місяців тому +34

    A very sobering analysis of the Israeli view of its local world.

    • @saffsuff
      @saffsuff 6 місяців тому +16

      Exactly...comments say it's unbiased 😂

    • @dammikasenarath1514
      @dammikasenarath1514 6 місяців тому +10

      Exactly it spelled out Israeli point of view.
      I'm looking forward to hearing point of view of other paries of this conflict in another video

    • @ahmadanbar4473
      @ahmadanbar4473 6 місяців тому

      Exactly, he started with the sponsor who helps him get unbiased information then makes the most biased video.
      I kept going until he said Israel independence from Britain, this is the most biased sentence I've ever heard.
      Britain created Israel on the Palestinian land through war crimes, rape, and ethnic cleansing

    • @VVayVVard
      @VVayVVard 6 місяців тому +3

      @@saffsuff It _is_ unbiased. Look at the title: the video is about the geopolitics of Israel. Individual-level conflicts have zero effect on geopolitical realities.

    • @msdfsdfe2533
      @msdfsdfe2533 6 місяців тому +4

      😂😂 tell me you hate israel without saying it.

  • @rajeev4243
    @rajeev4243 6 місяців тому +1

    One of the best analysis and explanationnof the issues and problems in implementimg the 1993 Oslo Peace accords and the 2 state solution. Well done mate and thank you for this incisive explanation

  • @ericvulgate7091
    @ericvulgate7091 6 місяців тому +6

    I get called a rassist if I point out that isreal cannot afford to give up the heights if they want to survive as a country.
    It's not a moral judgement it's just a fact.

  • @manythanks6476
    @manythanks6476 6 місяців тому +7

    Almost had us in the first half

  • @Praisethesunson
    @Praisethesunson 6 місяців тому +16

    As long as Israel maintains the backing of the global superpower. They will always have a foothold in the middle east.
    Failing that. The Israeli state will not collapse without resorting to a nuclear response.

    • @jaimintrivedi2207
      @jaimintrivedi2207 6 місяців тому +3

      this is just plain wrong

    • @samnamas3490
      @samnamas3490 6 місяців тому +1

      Breaking news: US is no longer the global superpower.

    • @Praisethesunson
      @Praisethesunson 6 місяців тому +5

      @@samnamas3490 Now that's wrong. Number 1 economy. Number 1 military power. Number 1 in total nuclear weapons power.
      The U.S is still the global superpower.

    • @Praisethesunson
      @Praisethesunson 6 місяців тому

      @@jaimintrivedi2207 It is correct. It just isn't morally right.

    • @samnamas3490
      @samnamas3490 6 місяців тому +1

      @@Praisethesunson being a superpower isn’t about being ranked number one. It’s about being the world hegemon.

  • @pebos1234567890
    @pebos1234567890 6 місяців тому +3

    this is an extremely well researched and balanced report thank you my friend

    • @knowledgeringsstalkers1795
      @knowledgeringsstalkers1795 6 місяців тому

      15:12 😂😂 LOL Palestinians loyal to the ISREALI State what useless research you have done. No one in theory and practicality believe that Palestinians to be loyal to isreal. Your views are totally biased and absolutely supporting to Palestine nevertheless you stating to use ground report.
      You are a Muslim radical supporter your solidarity is with Muslim and Islam only this have been shown in many videos of your supporting Palestine being Muslim majority against isreali. Same you had done with supporting Islamic republic of Pakistan over India.
      Why don't you have guts to criticize china.
      16-11-2023

  • @Miamcoline
    @Miamcoline 4 місяці тому

    THANK YOU! Simple as for such a complex topic. Anyone not engaging with these facts when discussing the topic is not discussing it realistically or in good faith. And you managed to do it in just 21 minutes somehow. Very well done.
    (Graphics could have been a tiny bit stronger but I understand the time and cost thinking.)

  • @pablowasserman
    @pablowasserman 6 місяців тому +51

    Never stop doing what you do. Great video as always. From Argentina, with love.

    • @ahmadanbar4473
      @ahmadanbar4473 6 місяців тому

      This was very biased. Like when he said Israel's independence from Britain, well Israel was made by Britain and it got established through ethnic cleansing, genocide, rape, and many war crimes.
      There was no Israel before 1948, it was Palestine documented in VISAs that Jews got when they came from Europe

    • @muhammedhisham8957
      @muhammedhisham8957 6 місяців тому

      Zionists were planning a Israel in your country first. May be the Jewish population reason. Any way later they Understood kicking out Arabs under British empire was easier. So here we are.

  • @Crashed131963
    @Crashed131963 6 місяців тому +16

    Those counties jumped Israel in 5 wars.
    After the Six Day war Egypt was lucky Israel gave them their Eastern lands back .
    Egypt is not trying their luck again .

    • @lexprontera8325
      @lexprontera8325 6 місяців тому

      Egypt is just like Pakistan in 1 way: having a military whose concern is winning elections not wars, a military which exists to hoard money and oppress civilians, not fight foreign enemies.

  • @kylejenkins907
    @kylejenkins907 6 місяців тому +2

    Another incredible breakdown, thank you!

  • @davidjay4373
    @davidjay4373 6 місяців тому +2

    Incredible analysis

  • @nattoralikk
    @nattoralikk 6 місяців тому +174

    Good video as usual! I really respect your ability to create unbiased content about such a heated and controversial conflict

    • @carlosfrancisco9645
      @carlosfrancisco9645 6 місяців тому +17

      comment is 2 minutes old and has 16 likes. definitely not a bot.

    • @butter_nut1817
      @butter_nut1817 6 місяців тому +7

      @@carlosfrancisco9645 its a valid point

    • @ntluck1592
      @ntluck1592 6 місяців тому +12

      @@carlosfrancisco9645 Of course its a bot. Hasbara strikes again

    • @yamoyum
      @yamoyum 6 місяців тому +1

      @@carlosfrancisco964516 minutes old. So you are wrong. U posted 3 mins ago. So the comment should be 5 min old by your logic

    • @nattoralikk
      @nattoralikk 6 місяців тому +1

      @@carlosfrancisco9645 The comment was 14 minutes old when you posted lmao, maybe you should learn to read mate

  • @nebraskarooster9244
    @nebraskarooster9244 6 місяців тому +30

    Fantastic content as usual. Thank you for putting these videos together.

  • @lotusbb6922
    @lotusbb6922 6 місяців тому +2

    Azerbaijan is great friends with Israel - that explains a lot about the misinformation in this report

  • @KevvDogg
    @KevvDogg 6 місяців тому +7

    Could you imagine how prosperous the area would have been if the Arabs would have just accepted the original land borders in 1947, they would had the Singapore of the Mediterranean. Jewish technology and innovation combined with nearby oil money and human capital of the Palestinians. People really have no care for their future generations when their perceived pride gets in the way. Ironically Israel would have been just 20% of the size it is now.😅

  • @hassanmohamed836
    @hassanmohamed836 6 місяців тому +6

    from the river to the sea palestine will be free

    • @Crysalis-bd9so
      @Crysalis-bd9so 6 місяців тому +2

      In your dreams maybe. Keep dreaming!

  • @alfredoblinder2306
    @alfredoblinder2306 6 місяців тому +8

    "their secret weapon: they have no place to go" that phrase is really what describe why Israel fights

    • @matej2733
      @matej2733 6 місяців тому

      well, their enemy put totall war ideology in, so thats it

    • @soleman7216
      @soleman7216 6 місяців тому

      22% are dual citizens? the leader of the country is some guy from Philadelphia? they've plenty of places, more than the Palestinians that's for sure. And before any "they(Palestinians) have the whole Arab world to take them in!" Why didn't the whole "free" world take in jews before the start of the holocaust? and why didn't some jews choose to leave even after violence rapidly escalated against Jewish communities' during and after Kristallnacht?

    • @aq4356
      @aq4356 6 місяців тому

      There were many proposed places for a Jewish state. Palestine was not the primary proposal. You had south America, Russia, Madagascar etc.
      "The Jewish question" was a purely European problem, Europeans are the actual anti Semites, they don't want Jews, it's why they kicked them out and let the Arabs/Muslims deal with them.

    • @muhammadkhan2007
      @muhammadkhan2007 6 місяців тому +1

      So do the palestinians...

  • @hrvojesvetec3058
    @hrvojesvetec3058 6 місяців тому +2

    And people asking what threat Isrsel facing today,in the past??..they only been attacked by a bunch of arab countries again and again,to totaly destroy Israel..what is Israelis thinking???how they dare to defend them self!!?😂😂😂

  • @shengwho8430
    @shengwho8430 6 місяців тому +29

    Shirvan thank you for again masterfully explaining the situation from your unique point of view to give everyone a birds-eye view. Your a gem and a true asset to humanity as strategist and analyst.

    • @gags730
      @gags730 6 місяців тому

      How did he suddenly lose his accent... If you watch the channel check an old video from a couple months ago. WTH?

  • @CrispySlap
    @CrispySlap 6 місяців тому +242

    As an Israeli, that’s the most unbiased informative video I’ve ever seen on Israel’s history. No narratives. just pure strategic and geopolitical point of view. Well done

    • @artenwarsame6991
      @artenwarsame6991 6 місяців тому +66

      Free Palestine 🇵🇸

    • @caven7056
      @caven7056 6 місяців тому +25

      So you admit her your country is wrong. Good

    • @mihovilraboteg6160
      @mihovilraboteg6160 6 місяців тому +66

      ​@@artenwarsame6991Nah, we dont need another terrorist state

    • @gauravshah89
      @gauravshah89 6 місяців тому

      @@artenwarsame6991 from Islam

    • @joemoody7440
      @joemoody7440 6 місяців тому

      No mention of the massacres of indigenous Palestinian population and ethnic cleansing of the Nakba!
      By foreign zionist settlers from all across the globe who decended on Palestine to create a sectarian settler state. Its quite a big portion of the history to leave out don't you think?

  • @AlbertBormant
    @AlbertBormant 6 місяців тому +4

    Great analysis as always!

  • @user-de5uz1hm4s
    @user-de5uz1hm4s 5 місяців тому +3

    There are mistakes in history regarding the State of Israel
    The Jewish people had the state of the Hebrews who, in those times in the biblical days, for those who were not Jews, called the land the land of Canaan.
    After that the nation of Israel was made up of 12 tribes
    That the two strongest tribes were Judah + Jerusalem and the surrounding area, and Israel north of it, the Kingdom of Dan = Tel Aviv and the surrounding area, etc.
    At that time in the Gaza area, for example, there was a non-Jewish tribe called the Philistines who had no connection to the Muslims or the Palestine.
    When the Romans and Greeks were an empire they ruled this area and therefore wanted to keep the Jews away from Jewish studies and connection to Judaism for loyalty to the religion and culture of the empires, the empires called this territory Palestine which continued until the Ottoman period and until the days of the British mandate that ruled Israel afterwards.
    At the time of the British Mandate there were Arabs in the Land of Israel and because some of the Arabs wanted to keep the Jews away from certain areas in the Land of Israel Israel and even the British fought them and some left for Arab countries, the majority of Arabs in Israel was under a million people in those times.
    When Jordan conquered Jerusalem, many Arabs returned to settle in Judea and Samaria in Israel
    When Egypt ruled Gaza, Muslims came to settle in Gaza.
    The State of Israel was Palestine because of the empires that changed its name
    Jews were called by the empires residents of Palestine including Arabs who lived there
    That is why there is no such thing as a Palestinian people, there is such a thing as Arab Muslim residents, some of whom were confused in Israel and are called Israeli Arabs, the Palestine of "today" is an invention for the connection of the Philistines or for the name of Israel in the past as Palestine - there is no connection even though they connect it in order to get land and occupy plots of land from Israel , the 1948 and 1967 map, these are maps that the Jews agreed with in their thinking, perhaps giving the Arabs territories and losing territories in Israel for peace - the one who started a war is the Arabs against the Jews, not the other way around, even though according to the Jewish religion and the biblical map, this land is the land of the Jews, the land of the Hebrew people, who are actually the Jews.
    This is the true story, it's a shame that it was the reality.
    Today it is Israel and Israel does not want to bring another 5 million Arabs into it
    Therefore, it is ready to lose territory and establish an Arab state that will be called Palestine or whatever they want.
    The big problem is that more than 50 percent of this population continues to stir up wars and terrorism and build resistance and do not want peace, therefore Israel has the right to defend itself and not support the establishment of a contiguous state that will be built on terrorist infrastructures, and therefore Israel wants security control.
    The Arabs of Israel, for example, are proud of their state, even though in their hearts they would like an Arab state, but they know and respect the Jews and know that this is their land and the state of the Jewish people.
    By the way, this part of Jordan was also the kingdom of one of the 12 tribes of Israel
    And the Jews do not demand this land from Jordan for peace
    Because what is important to the Jewish people above all is the city of Jerusalem.
    It's a shame that history is being distorted
    And in practice today, in order to establish the state of Palestine, it is necessary to exchange territories so that Israel does not lose 40 percent of its lands, and that any Arab leader who rules Palestine will make sure that terrorist organizations do not rule - the problem is that it is not guaranteed, and therefore peace is very far away even when trying to maintain peace.
    incidentally
    The Gaza strip was smaller than in the past, the village of Gaza, Khan Yunis, these are the main villages and cities in the area, Rafah belonged to Egypt.
    When we gave them a contiguous area called the Gaza Strip, we saw what happened?
    Most of the residents of Gaza chose resistance and Hamas, only half of them do not want them.
    A complex story, so in wars will you make peace? A problematic issue.
    Therefore, it requires the intervention of all countries in the world to solve this issue once and for all, and there are many options for both the Jews to be satisfied and the Arabs of the villages (the Palestinians in the new Jordan)
    And it's a shame that the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians want the entire territory of the State of Israel and declare war on the Jews. Is this a religious war?

  • @JorgeLimaJPL
    @JorgeLimaJPL 6 місяців тому +1

    Men! Your maps, animations, diagrams, storytelling are AMAZING! Very Inspiring. Do you have any course to teach us?

  • @cgrovespsyd
    @cgrovespsyd 6 місяців тому +7

    Best explanation about this complex issue I have seen/heard yet. A comprehensive understanding of the current situation as well as historical background and underpinnings is important if not crucial.

  • @stephenbrown937
    @stephenbrown937 6 місяців тому +70

    I’m a US citizen and Resident of the state of Wisconsin. I have not watched mainstream news since Obama was in office. Many Americans don’t watch mainstream news anymore we don’t trust our media or our government. Many of us use alternative sources. You are one of my favorite for geopolitical issue explanation giving me a non American perspective on many issues.

    • @joemosely9383
      @joemosely9383 6 місяців тому +29

      If you're only watching "alternative sources", you're still at a disadvantage Information wise.
      You need to watch it all so you can compare and analyze all the info and weed out the b.s on both sides.

    • @sata1938
      @sata1938 6 місяців тому

      The alternative sources are controlled by the mainstream

    • @the-quintessenz
      @the-quintessenz 6 місяців тому

      Dito!

    • @olliefoxx7165
      @olliefoxx7165 6 місяців тому

      ​@@joemosely9383I agree you need to cast a wide net however the corporate news is complete propaganda. It's a waste of time. Our best bet is to cast a wide net among various sources.

    • @dw7647
      @dw7647 6 місяців тому

      If you’re not watching editorialized news and you are getting your news from UA-cam and Facebook, you’re definitely eyeballs deep in conspiracy theories

  • @Kuiriel
    @Kuiriel 6 місяців тому +2

    I thought the Six-Day War began with a preemptive Strike by Israel rather than by strikes from other countries as described here?

    • @spicyonion736
      @spicyonion736 6 місяців тому

      Yeah, Caspian was a bit biased in this one

    • @ecksdee1637
      @ecksdee1637 6 місяців тому +1

      Its best to look at the context before rather than just who struck first.
      Egypt blocked Israels right to international waters by blockading the straits of Tiran a month before the war
      Also, Arab and Israeli armies both began to mobilize, with Syria concentrating its forces heavily in the north.
      From Israel's perspective, betting on peace didn't seem smart and they decided to begin the inevitable war on their own terms.

    • @ghosthunter0950
      @ghosthunter0950 5 місяців тому

      @@ecksdee1637 blocking of the straights is pretty much an act of war by itself.

  • @BMC2
    @BMC2 6 місяців тому +1

    It is worth nothing that in all the arab wars against Israel, not a single arab country sent their best armies nor huge numbers. The arabs were more afraid of each other or from an internal revolution with the army occupied than of Israel, hence why Israel got to beat them so easily.
    Add to it that certain countries like Morocco provided crucial intelligence on the attack which allowed Israel to position itself strategically and even carry out pre emptive attacks that cripled the Egyptian air force completely.

  • @aDeprivedSeal
    @aDeprivedSeal 6 місяців тому +11

    The thing that is weird to me is calling israels occupation of territory "illegal" the way humans have always worked is we fight over territory, the winner gets the territory. In 1967 multiple countries attacked israel, fighting a defensive war israel took over that land. Its israeli land now until someone else comes and takes it.

    • @marcomarin1196
      @marcomarin1196 6 місяців тому

      Do you agree with it just because it was done so often in the past?

    • @aDeprivedSeal
      @aDeprivedSeal 6 місяців тому

      @@marcomarin1196 yes, it is human nature. We are the most violent and territorial species on the planet.

    • @NWbeats
      @NWbeats 6 місяців тому +2

      The problem is that Israel doesn't want to be responsible for the people that it conquered. This is also why they never officially annexed the West Bank, just as they never will give citizenship to Palestinians who live in area A & B. Which is why it just keeps on occupying the territory, it is a never ending siege.

    • @aDeprivedSeal
      @aDeprivedSeal 6 місяців тому

      @@NWbeatsI never said they were doing good things. The last 70 years has shown that israel and everyone who perpetuates it are bad people. But unfortunately its their land to do with what they want.

    • @rizkyadiyanto7922
      @rizkyadiyanto7922 6 місяців тому

      you support russia then?

  • @UchihaNoble
    @UchihaNoble 6 місяців тому +7

    In 1967 the attack started from Israel's Side not from Arabs, I am Egyptian and I am telling you this is the real story

    • @UchihaNoble
      @UchihaNoble 6 місяців тому

      @@zjeee that era was a tention time, war and diplomatic tension, soldiers were inside their country no crossing, you are the silly here stupid punk

  • @joeyfitz9
    @joeyfitz9 5 місяців тому +4

    Truly outstanding documentary! Thank you!