I think it might be possible to have Stability almost 17 years, but some microscopic piece is missing that makes the recall impossible. You can patch it up in 2-3 repetitions and still get back to 17 years. As if fixing just one brick in a big building. Then 17 years later, you will surprise SuperMemo: "I still remember" :)
Occasionally do this myself and used to do it all the time but the longer I use incremental reading, the more I learn this is not worth it. If the priority is this low, keep it low or delete if not relevant/badly formulated (and the item shown in your video to me looks readily as delete candidate.)
I think it might be possible to have Stability almost 17 years, but some microscopic piece is missing that makes the recall impossible. You can patch it up in 2-3 repetitions and still get back to 17 years. As if fixing just one brick in a big building. Then 17 years later, you will surprise SuperMemo: "I still remember" :)
Occasionally do this myself and used to do it all the time but the longer I use incremental reading, the more I learn this is not worth it. If the priority is this low, keep it low or delete if not relevant/badly formulated (and the item shown in your video to me looks readily as delete candidate.)
I personally never do that. I rely on subsets in case I need to bypass the priority queue (filter browser by lapse, reps etc)