19:52 - Minor nit, Adam Neely is wrong. A second isn't defined as a division of a day or hour or minute, rather those are considered multiples of a second. The second is precisely measure defined by the International System of Units (SI) since 1967: "The second is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the caesium frequency, ΔνCs, the unperturbed ground-state hyperfine transition frequency of the caesium 133 atom, to be 9192631770 when expressed in the unit Hz, which is equal to s−1."
I see the main difference in human creativity and audio production mouse and keyboard clicks versus AI production is micro-intentions with each thought and move made. I’m Team Human obviously 😌
Profoundly philosophical and really fun interview. There's a new zeitgeist forming around using noise and randomness within constrained parameters and i love working this way. It's very validating to hear them talking about these subjects with sincerity and excitement. I love this podcast. Now I have to go listen to supertask and I'm almost certain I'll like his music.
@@analogueak Supertask is the shit. His live shows go so hard. obviously extremely bass heavy. Also check out his side projects Lab Group and Corporeal
The resolution question is super interesting. Sesnsitivity to input change based on our perception mechanism would be something intesting. But you have to consider that a 50hz change at 10khz is a much smaller percentage change or relative change vs 2hz change at 50hz. If you normalized the amount of changed so that a % change at given frequency ranges was tested you could probably fogire it out. I know the human eye is more sensitive to green hues.
Something i think is lost in modern production that could possibly be accomplished in a DAW is the happy little accidents that would happen during the analog mixing process that introduced new elements. Thinking like the old uk dub days, the dusty old orb releases that were almost smashed together to create these unique undertones and rhythms that aren't really a part of any one element but rather the output of mushing elements together. I think there's too much clarity and separation in modern production to recreate those more "natural" elements of old electronic production
I never clicked on a video so fast
The best 2 to ever do it. Both have changed the way i view music and production
currently my favorite producer. This is sick
19:52 - Minor nit, Adam Neely is wrong. A second isn't defined as a division of a day or hour or minute, rather those are considered multiples of a second. The second is precisely measure defined by the International System of Units (SI) since 1967: "The second is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the caesium frequency, ΔνCs, the unperturbed ground-state hyperfine transition frequency of the caesium 133 atom, to be 9192631770 when expressed in the unit Hz, which is equal to s−1."
great video here. Diving deep on this one.
Love Supertask, watching them produce on twitch is mesmerizing. One hell of a dj set to experience as well
When does he stream? (:
I see the main difference in human creativity and audio production mouse and keyboard clicks versus AI production is micro-intentions with each thought and move made. I’m Team Human obviously 😌
Profoundly philosophical and really fun interview. There's a new zeitgeist forming around using noise and randomness within constrained parameters and i love working this way. It's very validating to hear them talking about these subjects with sincerity and excitement. I love this podcast. Now I have to go listen to supertask and I'm almost certain I'll like his music.
Update. I love supertask. 🤷♂️
@@analogueak Supertask is the shit. His live shows go so hard. obviously extremely bass heavy. Also check out his side projects Lab Group and Corporeal
@@David-gp3fd i will definitely listen to those projects, thank you! His stuff scratches an itch for me
this scripted looping is literally a supertask at play - well played
Never seen or heard supertask talk ever 😂
lol the sublety of - "do you believe in simulation theory?" 🙃
The resolution question is super interesting. Sesnsitivity to input change based on our perception mechanism would be something intesting. But you have to consider that a 50hz change at 10khz is a much smaller percentage change or relative change vs 2hz change at 50hz. If you normalized the amount of changed so that a % change at given frequency ranges was tested you could probably fogire it out. I know the human eye is more sensitive to green hues.
great talks! You should try and get daverat on the podcast! that would be insane
Something i think is lost in modern production that could possibly be accomplished in a DAW is the happy little accidents that would happen during the analog mixing process that introduced new elements. Thinking like the old uk dub days, the dusty old orb releases that were almost smashed together to create these unique undertones and rhythms that aren't really a part of any one element but rather the output of mushing elements together. I think there's too much clarity and separation in modern production to recreate those more "natural" elements of old electronic production
Great dialogue.
So bummed he left Lab Group. Their last album was not the same after he left. And Charles 😔
He was being held back by a lot tbh.
gg
And reacting
The frist coment😊