It's the Dunning-Kruger Effect. After a single undergraduate course on a subject you are at "Mt. Stupid". You self rate your knowledge as expert without insight about how much you actually don't know while sounding like a moron to actual experts. A college degree pretty much puts you on Mt Stupid across many subjects, LOL.
Exactly. If only people put as much effort and passion towards being kind to others, self accountable for one's actions/decisions and discovering what talents each has that can contribute to making the world a little better each day.
Associating light with good and dark work bad has more to do with our evolutionary induced fear of darkness; after all, in humanity’s hunter gatherer days, that’s where the wolves were. If you want to associate that with the different populations of people treat each other, you’ve got your work cut out for you. Good luck.
I'd disagree, while that is a good example, our natural intuition to associate light/dark and good/bad is divinely given. That is to say, God created this intuition in us to help us stay alive not just physically like in your example but also spiritually.
Seriously. Gonna have a hard time arguing that darkness/blackness is associated with evil because of racism when countries across the entire world have the same concept in their mythologies, including Japan where, until the 20th century, they had at most a handful of black people on the island, ever.
Agree. Nearly all our predators could operate perfectly well in the dark eg. The big cats, snakes. We had little to no defence until we mastered fire. Ps. Which also heightens the light-safer/dark-fear dichotomy?
Both these girls (in the full video) are disturbing, the way they both seem PROUD of having the most shallow, unquestioning grasp of the """"moral truths"""" they're regurgitating, which they were obviously taught in uni. Neither of them present these ideas as "I was taught x,y and z", or "I believe x, y and z...". They both state their claims, as if they're objective, unquestionable TRUTHS, which everyone else MUST be made to submit to. I'm black, with parents who lived under apartheid, in South Africa; Opppsition to racism has always been a very close to home topic, for me... ...but with people like this, I think it's best to start at the foundation; Ask them "WHY is racism bad and immoral and unacceptable?" (Something many young people like this have never even questioned), and don't let them wriggle out of it, till they can give a coherent, rational answer. I'd rather deal with a racist who DOES question their own beliefs, and acknowledges that his beliefs are no more/less valid than anyone else's, than deal with people like this, who may superficially share my opposition to racism... but just act like unthinking authoritarians, unable to separate [what I was TOLD by my lecturer] vs [what MY OWN belief is] vs [what the objective truth is].... Critical thought, and acknowledging your own fallibility, is more important than ANY one specific belief. The tendency today to ONLY care about the specific beliefs, and often, to actively REJECT critical thought, and the possibility of your own fallability, is getting to pretty scary extremes... Dogmatism, even if it's dogmatic belief in a GOOD moral principle, is still harmful and dangerous, and is easily perverted, to do real damage- Even damage, in direct opposition to the dogmatically-held principle (see "opposing racial discrimination requires that we MUST always discriminate, depending on the races involved in a given incident...", or "protecting women's rights, requires that we MUST let men identify as women, and invade EVERY space/group for women and girls"...)
To your point about dogmatisms easy perversion, I have noticed how entertainment streaming services have established specific racial categories for films and television. If I want to watch Inside Man, a heist film starting Denzel Washington, I will not find it under categories such as Crime, Suspense, or Thriller, but under the category Black Voices, right next to Don't be a Menace to South Central while drinking your juice in the hood, which should be under Comedy.
Racism is a fictional problem, artificially induced by those who oppose it, in order to signal their "virtues" to those who "create" it. It does not exist. What exists are preferences from which all discriminations arise, followed by segregation based on those preferences.
She was right, though. She was talking about the movie. She might have been dead wrong about everything else, but she was referring to Get Out when she said that.
@@echodeltatango8030The film is not about slavery. Lmao if you really think it is. The film is satire, pointing out the hypocrisy of the "enlightened" people who think skin color determines innate or natural characteristics, i.e. critical race theory. You can watch interviews with the creator, Jordan Peele, for further understanding... but it's not a metaphor of slavery. Have you ever watched Key & Peele? They make fun of idiotic people like the girl in this clip & the stereotypes of white, black, Asian, Mexican, middle eastern, etc. people as a way to point out hypocrisy.
@@S_raB Thanks for the analysis. The film was about a lot of things. It had drama, science fiction, political commentary, comedy, etc. You might not remember the part in the movie where old, wealthy white people were actually bidding at an auction for which one would get to have Chris's body. Maybe you thought it just referred to an auction at Sotheby's
@echodeltatango8030 I suggest you watch Peele discussing the film. His thoughts on what it represents are much deeper than one scene and "slavery." That scene & the film altogether is not some neo-slavery commentary, but ruminating on the dehuminization of people due to their innate characteristics - white guy wants to be an artist, another wants to be an athlete, another wants [fill in the blank] but they all look at black people as less than human while simultaneously worshiping black people. That's the point - hypocrisy so deep, just like a lot of this woke vs anti-woke nonsense coloring America recently, that truth is lost in the shuffle, bled dry by those screaming tolerance while shooting at Trump; stained by those preaching genocide in response to war; etc.
I don't know how Peter has the patience to stand there and listen to so many blithering idiots on college campi. Must be worth it, but CRIMINY, what a way to make a living! Phew! I couldn't get through this short!
If you pick apart the word-salad of academic jargon, I think the point she’s trying to make is not unreasonable… When she says _“fetishization”_ she doesn’t mean _“sexual preferences”._ She means _“treating someone like an object”._ So that might appear appreciative at first, but actually be demeaning and hurtful.
Agree. The American Race Hate Industry has no problem with discrimination they like ie. They benefit from or it makes them (in their judgement) look better.
If you pick apart the word-salad, it’s not entirely unreasonable. Basically: Be careful if you have a strong sexual preference for people of a specific race, because you might end up treating them like objects in a way that is demeaning and hurtful.
She’s saying that racial preferences are still rooted in racism and most people don’t notice there racial preferences may originate from stereotypes… she could’ve said that a lot more concisely
So if I like strawberry milkshakes instead of vanilla does that mean I am ‘flavourizing’ my outlook. No, it doesn’t. Preferences have no necessary connection to value judgements. Preferences often - but not exclusively - exist at a level below the intellect; they can be purely aesthetic, instinctive or driven by one’s physiology. The irony here is that the desire to frame preference as a racial issue is in fact ‘racializing’ a domain that is no such thing. So she is enacting the very behaviour she is claiming to critique.
I love how you claim religious people never would sexually abuse someone. I mean if the activities of Catholic priests proves your point, then what does?
I like how Get Out is about people like her but she doesn’t realize it.
Get away!
How so? Please explain
This is what "highly educated" looks and sounds like.
God help us!!
It's the Dunning-Kruger Effect. After a single undergraduate course on a subject you are at "Mt. Stupid". You self rate your knowledge as expert without insight about how much you actually don't know while sounding like a moron to actual experts. A college degree pretty much puts you on Mt Stupid across many subjects, LOL.
This chick has deep thoughts about nonsense
You just gave me an extremely accurate and self-deprecating way to summarize my own intellectual life xD! Thanks, I guess...
100%
@@VestinVestin Do you believe the hyperbolic things coming out of this ladies mouth ?
Exactly. If only people put as much effort and passion towards being kind to others, self accountable for one's actions/decisions and discovering what talents each has that can contribute to making the world a little better each day.
i can envision her with 7 of her friends getting high and talking about whatever she is talking about reinforcing her position on nothingness.
I like chocolate more than vanilla. I must be racist.
Can you be a lot more specific?
@noone8418
The logic is exactly backwards.
That's prob enough internet for today.
It's 8am btw.
Excellent!
Good choice!
This is what brain washing looks like.
A redirtied mind?
This presumes she has a brain….
She doesn't have a brain to wash.
She sounds like her professor lets students smoke weed in class.
Associating light with good and dark work bad has more to do with our evolutionary induced fear of darkness; after all, in humanity’s hunter gatherer days, that’s where the wolves were.
If you want to associate that with the different populations of people treat each other, you’ve got your work cut out for you. Good luck.
I'd disagree, while that is a good example, our natural intuition to associate light/dark and good/bad is divinely given.
That is to say, God created this intuition in us to help us stay alive not just physically like in your example but also spiritually.
It's all in 'Iron John'
Seriously. Gonna have a hard time arguing that darkness/blackness is associated with evil because of racism when countries across the entire world have the same concept in their mythologies, including Japan where, until the 20th century, they had at most a handful of black people on the island, ever.
Agree. Nearly all our predators could operate perfectly well in the dark eg. The big cats, snakes.
We had little to no defence until we mastered fire.
Ps. Which also heightens the light-safer/dark-fear dichotomy?
Both these girls (in the full video) are disturbing, the way they both seem PROUD of having the most shallow, unquestioning grasp of the """"moral truths"""" they're regurgitating, which they were obviously taught in uni.
Neither of them present these ideas as "I was taught x,y and z", or "I believe x, y and z...". They both state their claims, as if they're objective, unquestionable TRUTHS, which everyone else MUST be made to submit to.
I'm black, with parents who lived under apartheid, in South Africa; Opppsition to racism has always been a very close to home topic, for me...
...but with people like this, I think it's best to start at the foundation; Ask them "WHY is racism bad and immoral and unacceptable?" (Something many young people like this have never even questioned), and don't let them wriggle out of it, till they can give a coherent, rational answer.
I'd rather deal with a racist who DOES question their own beliefs, and acknowledges that his beliefs are no more/less valid than anyone else's, than deal with people like this, who may superficially share my opposition to racism... but just act like unthinking authoritarians, unable to separate [what I was TOLD by my lecturer] vs [what MY OWN belief is] vs [what the objective truth is]....
Critical thought, and acknowledging your own fallibility, is more important than ANY one specific belief. The tendency today to ONLY care about the specific beliefs, and often, to actively REJECT critical thought, and the possibility of your own fallability, is getting to pretty scary extremes...
Dogmatism, even if it's dogmatic belief in a GOOD moral principle, is still harmful and dangerous, and is easily perverted, to do real damage- Even damage, in direct opposition to the dogmatically-held principle (see "opposing racial discrimination requires that we MUST always discriminate, depending on the races involved in a given incident...", or "protecting women's rights, requires that we MUST let men identify as women, and invade EVERY space/group for women and girls"...)
Very well put. The lack of critical thinking and, more dangerous, the growing attempts to prevent it are alarming.
To your point about dogmatisms easy perversion, I have noticed how entertainment streaming services have established specific racial categories for films and television. If I want to watch Inside Man, a heist film starting Denzel Washington, I will not find it under categories such as Crime, Suspense, or Thriller, but under the category Black Voices, right next to Don't be a Menace to South Central while drinking your juice in the hood, which should be under Comedy.
Racism is a fictional problem, artificially induced by those who oppose it, in order to signal their "virtues" to those who "create" it.
It does not exist.
What exists are preferences from which all discriminations arise, followed by segregation based on those preferences.
She needs to spend more time out in the world.
Shes in W Sq Park....THATS the problem!
When youve taken too many college courses and your brain falls out
Talking nonsense with such conviction.
She said, "It's like the modern day slave trade...." Really? The bar to call something slavery has gotten out of all proportion.
She was right, though. She was talking about the movie. She might have been dead wrong about everything else, but she was referring to Get Out when she said that.
@@echodeltatango8030The film is not about slavery. Lmao if you really think it is.
The film is satire, pointing out the hypocrisy of the "enlightened" people who think skin color determines innate or natural characteristics, i.e. critical race theory. You can watch interviews with the creator, Jordan Peele, for further understanding... but it's not a metaphor of slavery.
Have you ever watched Key & Peele? They make fun of idiotic people like the girl in this clip & the stereotypes of white, black, Asian, Mexican, middle eastern, etc. people as a way to point out hypocrisy.
@@S_raB Thanks for the analysis. The film was about a lot of things. It had drama, science fiction, political commentary, comedy, etc. You might not remember the part in the movie where old, wealthy white people were actually bidding at an auction for which one would get to have Chris's body. Maybe you thought it just referred to an auction at Sotheby's
@echodeltatango8030 I suggest you watch Peele discussing the film. His thoughts on what it represents are much deeper than one scene and "slavery." That scene & the film altogether is not some neo-slavery commentary, but ruminating on the dehuminization of people due to their innate characteristics - white guy wants to be an artist, another wants to be an athlete, another wants [fill in the blank] but they all look at black people as less than human while simultaneously worshiping black people. That's the point - hypocrisy so deep, just like a lot of this woke vs anti-woke nonsense coloring America recently, that truth is lost in the shuffle, bled dry by those screaming tolerance while shooting at Trump; stained by those preaching genocide in response to war; etc.
She definitely does slam poetry
Like?
I honestly don’t know if she said anything at all 😮
I don't know how Peter has the patience to stand there and listen to so many blithering idiots on college campi. Must be worth it, but CRIMINY, what a way to make a living! Phew! I couldn't get through this short!
Perfectly Rationalized Nonsense.
So as a black man im fetishizing my white wife? Wow..
If you pick apart the word-salad of academic jargon, I think the point she’s trying to make is not unreasonable…
When she says _“fetishization”_ she doesn’t mean _“sexual preferences”._ She means _“treating someone like an object”._
So that might appear appreciative at first, but actually be demeaning and hurtful.
Agree. The American Race Hate Industry has no problem with discrimination they like ie. They benefit from or it makes them (in their judgement) look better.
What the hell did she just say
If you pick apart the word-salad, it’s not entirely unreasonable.
Basically: Be careful if you have a strong sexual preference for people of a specific race, because you might end up treating them like objects in a way that is demeaning and hurtful.
She’s saying that racial preferences are still rooted in racism and most people don’t notice there racial preferences may originate from stereotypes… she could’ve said that a lot more concisely
She has what's called a grandiose ego.
So if I like strawberry milkshakes instead of vanilla does that mean I am ‘flavourizing’ my outlook.
No, it doesn’t. Preferences have no necessary connection to value judgements. Preferences often - but not exclusively - exist at a level below the intellect; they can be purely aesthetic, instinctive or driven by one’s physiology. The irony here is that the desire to frame preference as a racial issue is in fact ‘racializing’ a domain that is no such thing. So she is enacting the very behaviour she is claiming to critique.
I'm feeling a dizziness coming up when I hear her speaking.
Example of double speak right there
What the F___ is she talking about?????
Like?
No, black men are not good at basketball or sprinting and they are excellent swimmers. There see, I’m not racist.
Los ponjas son buenos para hacer poesía con pocas palabras, y los argentinos jugamos bien al fútbol
She thinks she's highly intelligent
"It's like in get out" 😂 yes life is like a Jordan peele movie.
The other woman dressed like the matrix and shit
Anyone else suddenly craving pretzels?
She seems smart. But also young. She will grow out of what she is saying right now one day
She broke down some concept is a very simple way ie building blocks and all the comment here are critiques without constructive rejoinders
These things are correlated. Look up the political compass fetish chart.
These ppl dont realize theyre the problem
Omg, you haven't seen get out???
What a waste of university education time/expense. You could get this off a short video like this one. 😂
I love how you claim religious people never would sexually abuse someone. I mean if the activities of Catholic priests proves your point, then what does?
She looks like she's reading something
Self flagellation
is she having a stroke?
Gobbledygook
A lot of projection, damn
Aww bless...
The has a lot of likes so she must be.....
You take forever to say nothing!