This is perfect, thank you so much. I got into TCG again in March, after mild interest as a kid. I played Zard until Twilight Masquerade came out, and now I've been searching for my next deck archetypes. I've been examining and trying control on TCG Live, so I've really really enjoyed watching your posts recently, especially this one!
While you have made some excellent points, you missed one thing: At certain points in the control v x matchup, it does become advantageous to take prizes and win that way. Hence the inclusions of Ursaluna and Radiant Charizard in many a Pigeot list. While the "focus" is indeed not to take prizes, discouraging their use whole sale only paints half the picture.
This is perfect, thank you so much. I got into TCG again in March, after mild interest as a kid. I played Zard until Twilight Masquerade came out, and now I've been searching for my next deck archetypes. I've been examining and trying control on TCG Live, so I've really really enjoyed watching your posts recently, especially this one!
Thank you so much, Hand Pancake Man!
Exceptional as always, I hope I will become able to talk like you soon, your videos are a source of inspiration to me
While you have made some excellent points, you missed one thing:
At certain points in the control v x matchup, it does become advantageous to take prizes and win that way. Hence the inclusions of Ursaluna and Radiant Charizard in many a Pigeot list.
While the "focus" is indeed not to take prizes, discouraging their use whole sale only paints half the picture.
Control is the pacifist deck lol
It is! Compared to aggro.
I wouldn't really call slowly constricting an opponent like a giant snake a 'pacifist' approach. ;P
@@altioramaar3264 where not constricting them like snakes where just hugging them
Like a wrestler in a submission hold, after the German suplex.
Wall is neutral. Mess with the opponent + optional violence