The way the plaintiffs laughed while the defendant talked about how they left poo on her doorstep and slashed her Christmas decorations was all I needed to see. They are terrible.
Exactly. Instead of looking with raised brows that something like that had happened, she's laughing that it happened. That's indicative of guilt. The judge was right about the plaintiffs vet bill, not the triple, but the actual cost, she should pay that. Because they asked for triple tells everyone what they need to know about it. Sorry for her loss. She needs a few cameras to cover that area of her yard that she claims was trespassed on previously because it could happen again. Get the video proof if it happens again.
Honestly, the lady lies about the fact that she never said she will pay the vet proven by the text message ... Sadly, I don't believe her. Only God knows.
The defendant made a great point about the plaintiff walking the dog down a private road because she didn't want it to get hit by a car. If her dog was on a leash, why would she worry about something like that?
Totally agreed. A cheap amazon camera pointed in their front yard, especially knowing that the plaintiffs are nasty people, would have closed this case.
Defendant in a text offered to pay. She never disputed the text in the courtroom. She said her dog went into the plaintiff's yard and attacked. Her dog died from getting injured going through the fence that she should have fixed but wants the plaintiffs to pay the bill for the care of her dog. Her famous "if you know them" defense knowing fully well it's an empty statement. Accusing them of everything that happens on her property but has zero proof. Maybe she's the problem.
The defendant should’ve paid the $197.93 however I believe EVERYTHING she said. She needs to put cameras up. The plaintiffs daughter is just over there laughing, this isn’t a funny situation.
That was pretty low of the female plaintiff to stand there laughing. I think they are 100% harassing the defendant. I wish the defendant had more evidence against them because I believe her.
@@kennethbaker5223 100% true. I'm not so dumb that I think that would affect the outcome of the case. It was just rude and telling of the kind of person she is.
I hope the defendant gets cameras and catches him doing something on her property so she can sue him. He’s a smarmy sneaky snake and I absolutely believe her.
I have a feeling he is exactly like she says he is,not excusing her responsibility in the injury of other dog but have met a few people in my 65 yrs that are like him
The plaintiff says I’m a professional right at the end with Doug. He surely is a professional. He’s one of those ppl who intentionally goes out of their way to sue. The big daughter even said she knew about the fence being broken. Plus she said she took that back street so her dog would not get hit by cars on the main road. Ugh she walks her dog off lease. She didn’t let him go to run away. It’s a small dog, if u have him on a lease and u see trouble reel him in and pick him up. No way is she walking that dog. Look at her. She’s lying.
I saw your comment before this started playing, and then I watched it, I completely agree. I've watched hundreds of episodes of every flavor of court TV, I would not speak like an attorney.
I believe the defendant when she said all those things about the plaintiffs and what they (potentially) did to her house. Especially with the daughter laughing about the testimony of the poop on the lawn, and the defendant saying if her dog was on a leash why would she go to a private neighbor to ‘not get hit by cars’. They just seem fishy to me.
@@Kre410 ya that is a good point about offering to pay in the text. She does give off Karen vibes lol, but I just wouldn’t be surprised at all if the plaintiffs created this scenario at the same time. I could totally see them being scammers
The lady was spot on, why did the daughter have to take the dog where she did because "there's no cars there" is the dog wasn't off leash. This was both their responsibility. I also believe the defendant, the plaintiffs are vile.
He absolutely is a serial litigator and perpetual victim who definitely put the feces in her yard ..he knows the attorney jargon, and his daughter laughing pfffft
Anyone who sues for treble damages, answer a question “I have no recollection of that”, and the judge’s spidy scenes make her ask “are you an attorney? Are you a retired attorney”, they are not knew to the court process.
100% believe the defendant, and I know that plaintiff lied in the judge’s face when he said he’s not an attorney AND when he said he was never in her yard with an unleashed dog.
Disgusting. Won’t continue to watch this one. He is a stalker and goes around looking to sabotage people’s lives. I hope she reads this and gets camera’s put up For everyone’s safety.
I believe the defendant as well. They say you can't judge a book by its cover, but the plaintiffs are scummy. "I'm a professional" plantiff says. Yeah a professional scumbag.
I'm very upset w Judge Milan in this case..I also have a dog w spinal injury who often drags himself,,,he wouldn't EVER be able to defend himself. I whole heartedly believe this Defendant. It's a shame she has no evidence. The Plaintiff makes me feel some type of way.. The Defendant NEEDS TO PUT CAMERAS UP!! Hide them so the Plaintiff's can't see them,,catch them in the act and then turn them in..
If this was judge Mathis he would’ve made that man pay the defendant for calling her job and getting her fired. You don’t do that!!! She should sue them now!!
If guy said that it was not this lady that is in court. Other lady had “brown hair and taller”, could it be different time that his dog got “attacked”? 🧐
The whole time I was watching this I believe the defendant but then at the end when she said that she never had a discussion with him about payment there was proof of that so now I'm not too sure
How infuriating. The plaintiffs dog was off leash that’s how the defendants paralysed dog was able to catch up to it and scratch it. She should have NEVER had to pay them.
I wish they talked more about her walking the dog down a private road. I believe the defendant. Also, if her dog was LEASHED like it should have been, she could have picked the dog up & kept it away from the disabled dog!
If I were the defendant, and what she says is true I’d file on that man for harassment, get a restraining order, and most importantly get security cameras placed around her house to catch him, or the daughter in the act.
The plaintiff looks shady. Even the judge felt that and asked him if he’s an attorney twice. I believe the defendant. If he does that for living, she can collect some evidence and punish him back!
I really hate it when the litigants go in &, while waiting for the case to be examined, one or the other - or both, stand there & stare down the other(s). I really don't blame the defendant for being angry with the plaintiff. BUT... she's having a problem with keeping the main thing the main thing! She wants to add so much more in with this case!
I have a woman in my neighborhood that used to let her dog off leash and wander into everyone’s yard. It would shit all over peoples yards, run right up to kids, etc and finally she was fined and ordered to keep her dog on a lead at all times. She was notorious in my neighborhood, everyone knew her. I believe this woman when she says the plaintiffs are known for their loose dog.
@@kennethbaker5223 no I know and I understand why the judge did not find in her favor. I was just saying I know people that are notorious in their neighborhoods for their loose dogs
the large lady in the moo-moo, when she was laughing IN court, and laughing while talking to Doug.....she is despicable, and i believe the defendant in this case
I believe these people did everything the defendant said he did. For a guy like that, the judgment was permission to continue the harassment. Im worried for the defendant and her daughter
The way the plaintiffs laughed while the defendant talked about how they left poo on her doorstep and slashed her Christmas decorations was all I needed to see. They are terrible.
Exactly. Instead of looking with raised brows that something like that had happened, she's laughing that it happened. That's indicative of guilt. The judge was right about the plaintiffs vet bill, not the triple, but the actual cost, she should pay that. Because they asked for triple tells everyone what they need to know about it. Sorry for her loss. She needs a few cameras to cover that area of her yard that she claims was trespassed on previously because it could happen again. Get the video proof if it happens again.
They totally did that
The plaintiffs look like the type to watch their dog poo in your yard and leave it.
I got a lot of those types in my neighborhood
Probably in their house too.
@@deloresdavis9874same
They actually look like they themselves would do the pooing, not only their dog
Look like the type? Hmmm. Interesting.
I believe the lady. She needs to put cameras up.
I don't, not a word. I googled the plaintiff, nothing. I
Honestly, the lady lies about the fact that she never said she will pay the vet proven by the text message ... Sadly, I don't believe her. Only God knows.
@@JayseGreeneyes, the almighty google knows it all 🙄🙄
I kinda believed the Defendant’s stories until she lied to Doug about not offering to pay cuz it’s in her texts.
Well the woman is not a judge she is an idiot but not a judge he had proof that the judge seen about her
The defendant made a great point about the plaintiff walking the dog down a private road because she didn't want it to get hit by a car. If her dog was on a leash, why would she worry about something like that?
Yup. Case should have been over the moment the plaintiff said that.
This man is creepy and calculated. I believe the lady.
The way Plaintiff speaks and is not an attorney tells me he has experience suing people. Something is up with this guy. I believe the defendant.
She needs a restraining order against these people!!!
Based on what? She has no proof. She might get a 90-day, but she wouldn't get a longer one after a hearing. No proof.
Plaintiffs are nasty people. Defendant needs cameras.
They certainly are
Agree
🎯
Totally agreed. A cheap amazon camera pointed in their front yard, especially knowing that the plaintiffs are nasty people, would have closed this case.
Defendant in a text offered to pay. She never disputed the text in the courtroom. She said her dog went into the plaintiff's yard and attacked. Her dog died from getting injured going through the fence that she should have fixed but wants the plaintiffs to pay the bill for the care of her dog. Her famous "if you know them" defense knowing fully well it's an empty statement. Accusing them of everything that happens on her property but has zero proof. Maybe she's the problem.
i believe her that the plaintiffs are harassing her... they have that dead look in their eye
I agree
I believe her too. The plantiffs are very odd and give bad vibes.
Same. Judge lack a sense of common sense
She should definitely get a camera cause the man is a weirdo
Exactly and how the daughter laughed
she just ruled in favor of a couple of scam artist lol
Get the evidence
The lady texted she'd pay and her boyfriend claimed liability .... Judge go by the evidence I'm afraid even if the plaintiff not nice people ....
The defendant should’ve paid the $197.93 however I believe EVERYTHING she said. She needs to put cameras up. The plaintiffs daughter is just over there laughing, this isn’t a funny situation.
I agree. He did have the text to prove that she was going to pay it.
@@cMrob73She lied to Doug at the end and yelled that she NEVER offered to pay
@@bash547I think maybe she was playing semantics since technically her boyfriend offered. It was not a good look for her.
@@juliecranford534 her bf offered then she confirmed in her text. She lied.
@@juliecranford534 she said she never had a conversation about money when her text discussed payment and the vet bill. That’s not semantics.
That was pretty low of the female plaintiff to stand there laughing. I think they are 100% harassing the defendant. I wish the defendant had more evidence against them because I believe her.
None of it would matter. The facts of the case remain the same. Their dog got out, and attacked another dog.
@@kennethbaker5223 100% true. I'm not so dumb that I think that would affect the outcome of the case. It was just rude and telling of the kind of person she is.
I hope the defendant gets cameras and catches him doing something on her property so she can sue him. He’s a smarmy sneaky snake and I absolutely believe her.
She needs to put cameras up around her house ( hidden cameras for the first couple of months) that’s how ya catch him
I have a feeling he is exactly like she says he is,not excusing her responsibility in the injury of other dog but have met a few people in my 65 yrs that are like him
11:20 He's about to BURST OUT LAUGHING. He's laughing that she's crying her eyes out. What a creep.
The plaintiff says I’m a professional right at the end with Doug. He surely is a professional. He’s one of those ppl who intentionally goes out of their way to sue. The big daughter even said she knew about the fence being broken. Plus she said she took that back street so her dog would not get hit by cars on the main road. Ugh she walks her dog off lease. She didn’t let him go to run away. It’s a small dog, if u have him on a lease and u see trouble reel him in and pick him up. No way is she walking that dog. Look at her. She’s lying.
Big daughter 😂😂
Agree 100%
He's probably a sovcitard. Everything is ALWAYS someone else's fault. Those stupid fake Auditors that lie about the Constitution just for click baits
Are you willing to get this statement notarized for the court?
I didn't think about that. Most small dog owner would have pulled them in and picked them up.
The plantiff father is a wannabe lawyer and is a most likely a professional suer.
What an pos
I completely believe the defendant and it’s unfortunate she has no proof. Cameras. Cameras. Cameras.
The judge believes her too. But where is the proof?
He’s definitely a lawyer. The language and demeanor. He didn’t want to be held at a higher standard so he claimed he wasn’t.
I saw your comment before this started playing, and then I watched it, I completely agree. I've watched hundreds of episodes of every flavor of court TV, I would not speak like an attorney.
Or he's in court a lot for suing everyone
I believe the defendant when she said all those things about the plaintiffs and what they (potentially) did to her house. Especially with the daughter laughing about the testimony of the poop on the lawn, and the defendant saying if her dog was on a leash why would she go to a private neighbor to ‘not get hit by cars’. They just seem fishy to me.
YES When the plaintiff first said that where she walked I immediately understood it was because her dog must not have been on a leash
She lied. They did nothing but want their vet bill. Why not pay it? By the way the text proved she offered…yet she lied. She’s a Karen.
@@Kre410 ya that is a good point about offering to pay in the text. She does give off Karen vibes lol, but I just wouldn’t be surprised at all if the plaintiffs created this scenario at the same time. I could totally see them being scammers
Harvey would probably call this case "Fence her, her hardly knew her" even though it makes no sense. 😂
Harvey is the worst.
@@madalynnk4221he’s actually the best. Which is why he’s been narrator for the show from day one
No recolation IE; He's not denying it ever happened, just that he doesn't remember it happening.
*Recollection
Exactly! Lawyer speak for it happened, but I don't want to lie, so I don't recall. Lol
That's why she asked if he's a lawyer😅
The lady talking to Harvey, " .....Yeah cuz they're not really paralyzed" Harvey hurried up and corrected that lol
The people outside are almost always wild 😂
Her boyfriend had no legal right to speak on her behalf.
I believe the plaintiffs are doing EVERYTHING the defendants said. They look vindictive and crazy
Whenever someone says "I don't recall " they're lying and shouldn't be trusted
They are serial plaintiffs 😂😂 if what the defendant says is true. That’s why he knows so much court talk
8:35 He's a LAWYER. Nobody would call it a small claims MATTER except an attorney. That's how we speak.
Soon as the plaintiff laughed and couldn’t stop I believed she didn’t and the laugh was because they had no proof.
The lady was spot on, why did the daughter have to take the dog where she did because "there's no cars there" is the dog wasn't off leash. This was both their responsibility. I also believe the defendant, the plaintiffs are vile.
He absolutely is a serial litigator and perpetual victim who definitely put the feces in her yard ..he knows the attorney jargon, and his daughter laughing pfffft
plaintiff is a creep. weird daughter too.
The plaintiff was definitely at the Capitol on Jan 6.
I'd give him that $197 in dirty, unrolled pennies.
Dirty and STICKY.
Anyone who sues for treble damages, answer a question “I have no recollection of that”, and the judge’s spidy scenes make her ask “are you an attorney? Are you a retired attorney”, they are not knew to the court process.
The entitlement of the plaintiffs is disgusting. I believe the defendant.
Miss Piggy walks in laughing. What a disgrace.
I 1000% BELIEVE the defendant, and I think that she should place cameras all around her property, because he and his daughter don’t seem very stable.
100% believe the defendant, and I know that plaintiff lied in the judge’s face when he said he’s not an attorney AND when he said he was never in her yard with an unleashed dog.
Disgusting. Won’t continue to watch this one. He is a stalker and goes around looking to sabotage people’s lives. I hope she reads this and gets camera’s put up For everyone’s safety.
She needs to put up security cameras and catch him. He and his daughter look a little crazy to me. I would not want to live near either one of them.
But if she's not the person they saw, how can she be responsible legally?
What a mean jerk. And Jabba over there laughing. 🙄
He is a lawyer 😂😂😂
Cameras all over your house would get your proof of whomever is going in your yard.
I believe the defendant as well. They say you can't judge a book by its cover, but the plaintiffs are scummy. "I'm a professional" plantiff says. Yeah a professional scumbag.
The defendant is a fat Karen. Every time she spoke she lied. She even changed her hair color to try and set them up. You ppl are gullible. Lol
What did he do? 😀
That guy definitely put poo and slashed her Christmas decorations! Poor lady
She needs cameras and then take him back to court for harassment
I'm very upset w Judge Milan in this case..I also have a dog w spinal injury who often drags himself,,,he wouldn't EVER be able to defend himself. I whole heartedly believe this Defendant. It's a shame she has no evidence. The Plaintiff makes me feel some type of way.. The Defendant NEEDS TO PUT CAMERAS UP!! Hide them so the Plaintiff's can't see them,,catch them in the act and then turn them in..
If this was judge Mathis he would’ve made that man pay the defendant for calling her job and getting her fired. You don’t do that!!! She should sue them now!!
Judge Mathis is an idiot!
The fact that he wanted to triple the amount kind of makes me think the defendant was telling the truth about their behavior.
That guy was my lawyer 16 years ago!!!
I hope she put cameras up
I believe her 100%
If he's not a lawyer or ex lawyer, he's definitely close with one the way he was talking in the post trial interview
He just watches a lot of court shows and reads.🙄.
Right lol basic knowledge that's easily attained@@gaylewhauwhau3972
He is a salesman and a professional trainer, think of the worst car salesman and lawyers you can imagine, he probably trained them.
He said “I’m a professional“!!
Totally believe the defendant.
The plaintiffs give off crazy icky vibes. The plaintiff needs to get multiple cameras.
The plaintiff is C-R-E-E-P-Y...
The plaintiff's smirk tells me all I need to know about the truth of the defendant's allegations about harassment.
Do onto others as they do onto you! Paybacks are hell!
If guy said that it was not this lady that is in court. Other lady had “brown hair and taller”, could it be different time that his dog got “attacked”? 🧐
Amazing how her crying stopped abruptly when judgement was passed 😂
The whole time I was watching this I believe the defendant but then at the end when she said that she never had a discussion with him about payment there was proof of that so now I'm not too sure
That kid has such a smirk on his face.
that evil girl when she laughed, she showed her true black color RIGHT THEN
They should not have been allowed to harass her without penalty or repercussions. Too bad she didn’t have proof because I believe her
I’m sorry I had to laugh when the defendant said her dog drags himself like a MERMAID 😂😂😂😂😂😂
MERDOG. Yeah. Paralyzed in the back. Sad if true.
The crying stopped after the judgements.😂😂😂
I believe her for some reason ! She needs to get cameras all over her house on the kow n record him .. he know what he is doing !!
Perfect. Happy Thursday all. Hope everyone has a wonderful day. ❤
Happy Thursday! 🤍
Happy Thursday to all and God bless 🙏🏽
Thank you, happy Thursday to you as well. Have a great day my friend.
Thursday was good, now enjoying my Friday morning eating breakfast and watching The People's Court in sunny Australia. 😊😊
he’s no lawyer; he sounds like a professional plaintiff…
The guy used to be an attorney for sure ,and I believe her about what she says about them .
I believe the defendant the fact the girl was laughing
Dog owners like car owners, should have to get insurance
Time to get camera's ! that whole block needs to all keep an eye on the Plaintiff ! This one sucks!
Mixed feelings. The Defendant 14:11 is responsible for the injuries to both dogs. But I do think the Plaintiffs do stuff to harrass her.
Was it even HER dog?
She says she doesn't look the same.
How infuriating. The plaintiffs dog was off leash that’s how the defendants paralysed dog was able to catch up to it and scratch it. She should have NEVER had to pay them.
I wish they talked more about her walking the dog down a private road. I believe the defendant. Also, if her dog was LEASHED like it should have been, she could have picked the dog up & kept it away from the disabled dog!
He talks like a lawyer. And why would you walk your dog there just so he wouldn't get hit by a car. It makes no sense.
If I were the defendant, and what she says is true I’d file on that man for harassment, get a restraining order, and most importantly get security cameras placed around her house to catch him, or the daughter in the act.
I feel bad for the defendant, but the judge did have to go by laws regardless how fckedup the situation is
He looked to smug !
Yesssss
The smirk tells it all!!!
The plaintiff looks shady. Even the judge felt that and asked him if he’s an attorney twice. I believe the defendant. If he does that for living, she can collect some evidence and punish him back!
I think JM should have allowed the defendant to call the police department herself, as she has allowed others to do in the past.
It was a reason the judge asked him if he was an attorney or retired? Wished that she had divulged why she was inquiring.
For how often she says, "If not you, then who," you'd think she'd have given the defendant an inch of grace on this one.
That’s what I said! She didn’t even entertain the possibility.
13:38 Why is the daughter plaintiff while the defendant is talking about all the horrible things that happened to her, and her property.
I believe her, he seems like he's got a mean streak. Shame on him!!!!
She shot herself in the foot by texting that she'll pay
The son needs to sit down. He looks like he needs to go to the toilet.
I really hate it when the litigants go in &, while waiting for the case to be examined, one or the other - or both, stand there & stare down the other(s).
I really don't blame the defendant for being angry with the plaintiff. BUT... she's having a problem with keeping the main thing the main thing! She wants to add so much more in with this case!
plaintiffs seem like sociopaths…
I believe the defendant.
That father daughter are creeps!!!!!
They did it the daughter couldn't even hold her composure about the nasty stuff they were doing
I have a woman in my neighborhood that used to let her dog off leash and wander into everyone’s yard. It would shit all over peoples yards, run right up to kids, etc and finally she was fined and ordered to keep her dog on a lead at all times. She was notorious in my neighborhood, everyone knew her. I believe this woman when she says the plaintiffs are known for their loose dog.
Even if that is true, the defendant's dog got out, and attacked the plaintiff's dog.
@@kennethbaker5223 no I know and I understand why the judge did not find in her favor. I was just saying I know people that are notorious in their neighborhoods for their loose dogs
the large lady in the moo-moo, when she was laughing IN court, and laughing while talking to Doug.....she is despicable, and i believe the defendant in this case
The plaintiff said the lady had “light brown hair, and pigeon tails”. What the heck are “pigeon tails”?!😳🤔
I believe these people did everything the defendant said he did. For a guy like that, the judgment was permission to continue the harassment. Im worried for the defendant and her daughter